TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Stee_Jans Archive

View 1 post and 31 comments by Stee_Jans on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's fantastic!!
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:35 AM
0

I really try to keep a cool head about this stuff, but I just want to face-desk myself with this. Sometimes I hate Social Media. Don't even really upvote this cause its more venting than a discussion topic. GAH!!!!
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:25 PM
1

Brian Banks
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:15 AM
3

Like deluks917 says http://marriedmansexlife.com/books/primer/ Read this book as a starting point. You have nothing to be ashamed about as a man. 50 years of feminism have taught little boys to be ashamed of themselves, and taught little girls that it is okay to shame boys. The repercussions of that are these deep seated feelings of shame and guilt surrounding our natural desires for sex. Its a false hood where your higher cognitive functions and trained behaviour are combating millions of years…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:51 AM
2

Wouldn't this be a violation of a persons constitutional rights if the one asking the questions was a police officer, without probable cause of suspicious behavior. So instead, feminist agenda pushers, move the responsibility to physicians who can, without breach of the US constitution ask these questions with out probable cause. This seems very disturbing to me. Very glad I am not a US citizen.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:14 AM
1

In the US, at least, when a woman makes an allegation of rape against a man. She, as the "victim", legally has her name protected from any and all media publications. While the man as the "perpetrator" does not have the same consideration. This leads to slanderous reports then associated with that persons name, regardless of innocence. This has, in numerous occasions been used as a means of ending careers, bullying, and blackmail against men, by women. It tends to become a case of guilty u til p…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:34 PM
2

How do you control for altruism...
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:31 PM
6

I think this is hilarious. It seems to be something thought up by a young child that has never been in a sexual relationship. That's not quite how sex works at all. It seems, to me at least, that this is just more shaming tactics to make men feel inadequate. I've been married a good, long, while now and could count on one hand the number of times that my wife and I have had simultaneous orgasms. Tl;dr children should be seen and not heard
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:25 AM
6

Man assaults woman, he's a piece of shit. Woman attacks man, he must be guilty of something. Fucking horse shit.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:12 PM
1

This seems messed up. "Exploited". Are you fucking kidding me, seems like pimped out, molested, and destroyed her childhood.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:53 PM
18

Note to self: If I don't want to be recorded in public, looking like a mental patient, don't act like a mental patient in public.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:45 AM
2

And here, boys and girls, we have the perfect example of shaming tactics. "What the fuck is wrong with you". This,fellow MRA's, is the weapon of feminists trying to shut us up. They can't actually come up with a cogent argument, so the alternative, is to shame you into silence.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:28 AM
0

Fair enough, I just wouldn't be all that surprised when she becomes flaky and falls back into old RadFem belief structures. I.E. Eugenics, murder, and infanticide. Ninja Edit: I hope you're right though.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 03:45 AM
26

Its great that you're out there engaging in discourse with, what sounds like a RadFem, but if you managed to change a persons belief system in an hour be prepared for her to be swayed back too. Again, kudos to you for engaging in dialogue. Keep up the fight.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:59 AM
2

But false statistics is not a difference of opinion. Its wrong information. As for the two post thing. That was a screw up on my reddit app.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:39 AM
8

I'm sure its a good article, but I stopped reading sat 77cents on the dollar.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:22 AM
18

I'm sure its a good article, but I stopped reading sat 77cents on the dollar.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:22 AM
4

Really? Because there are many adults who have things like their appendix and tonsils removed. Parts of the body that serve no function other than getting infected. In the case of Tonsils and Appendix it is only done under emergency conditions. When there is a quantifiable and serious medical need. Tonsilitis is now treated with antibiotics rather than straight removal like it used to and Appendectomies are only done if the appendix become infected. I was under the impression that the Appendix w…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:40 AM
5

No I think you're right. I don't believe that there is an anti-man conspiracy over circumcision. I do believe that it is a holdover from a more religious heritage in western society. Something that is slowly being weeded out. Which is good.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:24 AM
2

As it relates to MR it's more of a "if it's good for the Goose, it's good for the Gander" situation. FGM is just straight up illegal in most parts of the world (As I think it should be). Even just the pin prick to achieve a drop of blood. However, other than Germany, Circumcision is not. It's funny though. Even the language that we use to describe it is contrite. Female Genital Mutilation versus Circumcision. When, I believe, that it is just genital mutilation as a whole. but regardless of what …
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:21 AM
3

Don't get me wrong. I don't think you've been wronged. And depending on your age the 'best' medical advice at the time would have been to get snipped. Myself I'm 30 and all the advice at that time was to get cut. My folks just decided that they didn't want me to be. Yeah sorry, I probably should have not ended my post with " I hope that helps" but rather I hope this helps you understand my position a bit better. Also, I'm upvoting your posts cause I think they are valid questions for a discussio…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:19 AM
8

There are something along the lines of 20,000-70,000 erogenous nerve endings in the foreskin. So it would be a fair bit of diminishment in sensation as opposed to having an intact foreskin. A quick Google search brought up a few things, linked to here: Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis The Sexual Effects of Circumcision This one is a blog, but links to the study, and sums up the important parts, I thought. I know that when I spoke to the Doctors about it when my son was born he d…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:55 AM
9

perhaps because the majority of circumcised men are happy they received it, Has anyone ever met a man that was happy to have part of his dick cut off? I haven't, but I cant speak for all men like you can. So I guess I better get myself to the doctors and ask for a non-beneficial cosmetic surgery that diminishes sensation and sexual satisfaction.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:15 AM
2

I was under the impression that the equivalent would be removing some of the clitoral hood. Not the clitorus itself. Either way cutting on babies for NO medical benefits is wrong.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:23 AM
1

Hands down, dumbest statement I have ever read.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 06:22 AM
1

I can see your logic in that. However, the rhyme is little boys and little girls. There are also, according to the linked page, verses on men, women, soldiers, nurses, sailors, etc etc. Some of which are not flattering to any gender. Young men are made of leers and crocodile tears. While nurses are made of thorns and cows horns. Like i said, I can see your logic, but still don't think its worth the time of MRAs. I think, and this is just my belief, thatwe should focus on current issues rather th…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:30 AM
3

I don't think this is really something that concerns men's rights. Its a nursery rhyme that is purportedly 200+ years old. This kinda feels, to me, like grasping at straws for something to be upset about.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:25 PM
3

As piss-poor as this book is. It was written in 1994, according to Amazon anyway, which would account for the multi-font cluster-fuck on the cover. The book, more than likely, reflects the views of a misandric mind-set and poor judgement. According to her website, not posting it; doesn't deserve the traffic, she writes self help books. But if the genders where reversed it would be called hate speech. Fuck trash like this. Until we start to call this shit out in a big way, as it happens, then peo…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 02:55 PM
6

I truly don't think that you represent MRAs. Please do not identify yourself as one. You just make it harder for the rest of us...
/r/MensRights13/10/12 10:37 AM
6

So does self control.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:17 PM
3

Long time Lurker here, and no PUA by any sense of the term. However, as someone that has suffered from confidence issues in the past, my advice would be to find something that you are good at. And when I say good I mean the best. It could be anything, literally anything. When your feeling insecure about something just remember what it feels like doing what your the best at and use that as your confidence builder. When I was younger I was one of the very best wooden truss manufacturers in my area…
/r/seduction24/05/12 01:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter