TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Steelsword06 Archive

View 0 posts and 113 comments by Steelsword06 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Wheres your proof I'm a troll?
/r/MensRights06/12/23 09:14 AM
1

why?
/r/MensRights06/12/23 09:02 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights06/12/23 08:18 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 08:16 AM
1

Because they are not.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 08:10 AM
-9

You guys are so dumb.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 07:12 AM
1

I'm not.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 06:37 AM
1

I dont have one.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 09:13 PM
1

Get over yourself.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 06:00 PM
-1

Guess I'll see you tonight in my Chinese order.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 05:58 PM
1

Iq talk only comes from dummies
/r/MensRights05/12/23 11:55 AM
1

I'm right.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 09:31 AM
1

Never did any of that dude but have fun with your delusions.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 09:31 AM
0

I never said that. Bigot against who? hypocrite how? ridiculous you people are as unhinged as the crazy feminists you talk about.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 09:08 AM
-1

They have a lot of lead in the water in Romania?
/r/MensRights05/12/23 08:22 AM
2

Female circumcision is not the same thing is not even comparable to male circumcision.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 08:22 AM
-1

Women don't have penises so they are not "exempt" from anything they just simply do not have the equipment that it applies to.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 07:47 AM
0

You could have said the lecture for someone who was interested. I'm sure your country has tons of sayings you can misapply to people in an internet debate.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 07:45 AM
0

Never have, never will be a hypocrite. I said clearly true things and you are mad about it.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 07:12 AM
-1

No they made claims so they should be supporting them.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 05:12 AM
1

I don't really believe this tbh. I'm not sure if any sort of chivalrous beliefs would have been appealed to if it was on the basis of discrimination and law, it was more likely an appeal to a marginalized status or certain precedent that existed for other minorities prior to the passing of these laws. If not that then it would probably be some sort of religious appeal to the sanctity and grace of women being respected. The idea that men in power chivalrously gave "misogyny" a certain status to b…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 04:45 AM
1

You don't have to give a fuck. You really made a good argument for once and thought you got me???? You didn't even make an equal assesment to what I said because I'm talking about the fact that these ideas exist for women because people went out of their way to make those things happen. They saw the status of women and females across the world and organized to make sure that a political body out there recognized those things as misogyny. If you felt the merit of their claims weren't valid that w…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 04:40 AM
1

I only said it didn't exist one time and then you provided four examples, one of which was the time i was talking about, and the other three were times where i did not say anything like that. If misandry is real then you should be able to provide proof of it being real. Misandry should be the deepseated hatred of men in society. None of the examples given are misandry.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 03:43 AM
-2

Ofc you have to prove your point you're the one saying its discrimination. I'm not. If you give bad examples and I say thats not discrimination or misandry then that doesn't mean you just stop trying to prove it.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 03:34 AM
1

No I should not. Its not inconsistent with anything. The law exists because movements like feminism and womens rights movements got it to do those things not because some inherent bias against men or whatever.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 02:45 AM
1

ok why would i give a fuck about the Istanbul Convention? Thats just feminism and women's rights being applied by some sort of body, that doesn't mean misandry is real.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 01:08 AM
-1

facts just are. I don't need to prove anything about them.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:55 AM
1

wing you examples of what they believe counts as misandry which is way more effort than you did to prove that it doesn't e Ok well it still didn't prove anything.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:54 AM
-2

They are asking why we focus on one thing "Misogyny" and ignore "Misandry" That is making a claim. I know my own emotions, you guys are the ones angrily replying to me calling me a troll.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:54 AM
1

Theres nothing to prove. Its not discrimination. You're the one making the claim its discrimination so you have to prove it.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:52 AM
0

Because it's not.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:39 AM
1

They have not done that.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:26 AM
1

Not at all.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:22 AM
1

Amazing because by your own logic it would.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:11 AM
1

No I did not.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:11 AM
1

I did not do that but ok.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:55 PM
1

What does that make you?
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:55 PM
-2

Ofc not, its simply my way of relaying a fact to you.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:50 PM
1

There is no concept that I didn't understand. Apparently you all failed to understand whatever concept you kept trying to shove down my throat.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:49 PM
-1

Do you think saying "Yes it is" is going to make it true.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:48 PM
-2

No its not.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:26 PM
1

You're apparently around some really smart kids then. If i wanted to act obtuse there are actual ways of doing that. Simply saying that "youre wrong" is not being obtuse. It is obtuse to tell someone making a comment on a post that they have to prove their point or whatever. I wouldn't be surprised that you believe that because you're not very smart to begin with so you would get the wrong impression from my comment.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:26 PM
-2

No its not.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:12 PM
1

I want to argue by being short and curt with people being rude to me??? interesting.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:11 PM
-2

Ok? how is this misandry?
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:10 PM
1

No not at all, but if you need to make up stuff because what i said hits too close to home for you then I can't stop you.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 10:59 PM
1

Proof that something doesn't exist? Actually the OP made the initial claim if you want to start yelling about burden of proof or whatever dumb shit you're mad about. You also made claims in your post and you haven't given any proof or whatever that its true. I haven't "shifted" burden of proof on anyone. You just want to get into a pissing contest because I said something you're mad about.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 10:33 PM
0

I'm not shifting any burden of proof. You said those things are misandry. Where's your proof? The only troll here is you.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 09:31 PM
0

No you are the one saying those things are misandry. You have to prove that.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 09:06 PM
1

its not an argument.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 09:05 PM
1

Ok? Your point?
/r/MensRights04/12/23 09:02 PM
0

No, it doesn't. I don't have anything to prove, you do.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 09:01 PM
-1

Well, no one doing circumcision would call it mutilation, so clearly that's not what they are doing. You haven't explained how is misandry at all. You just compared men to women and claimed it was because of misandry.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 09:01 PM
1

It's not discrimination. It's religious tradition.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 08:55 PM
-5

You're the one that should be explaining how they are?
/r/MensRights04/12/23 08:54 PM
-6

It's not.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 08:49 PM
-16

Because it's made up nonsense. Circumcision isn't misandry. Corny feminist isn't misandry. None of those are misandry.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 08:45 PM
-27

Misandry isn't real. You shouldn't be teaching your sons "the dangers of misogyny" either, though.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 07:43 PM
12

Its always been like this. Women with women has always been considered hot at best and bad but not a big deal at worst. Men are considered disgusting for engaging with any of it. It's been something that calls his manhood/masculinity into question.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 03:15 AM
-14

Uh oh its time for the pocket watching losers to come in and vouch for a random male celebrity before they know anything about the case or his own opinion about what happened because they are a bunch of dead beat fathers who think people's kids should only be entitled to whatever they deem the bare minimum. I'm pretty sure this place is just a psyop for feminism by yelling about equality but trying to make it appeal to broke dudes.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 12:27 AM
8

Who would want her for anything but money.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:34 PM
1

And?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 03:32 PM
1

re are both male and female victims, but the female victims get faaaar more support. Focusing on supporting female victims and completely ignoring male victims shows an anti-male bias because No it doesn't. The people just support the women or care about the women so they support them.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 12:06 PM
0

What does any of that have to do with only focusing on women? Tearing down men's facilities is not focusing on women.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 11:47 AM
-1

Only focusing on women is not an anti-male bias. I'd imagine I'd know enough about this person to know if they were on to some funny stuff or not. This was not a good comparison since I know the person or have followed them long enough to get an impression about them. If they are some random nobody then I would not attack them for feeling sad that bad things happen to a group of people. When talking about what other side?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 11:03 AM
-2

Well, why bring up those statistics if they are talking about women?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 02:33 AM
-8

Did you have a stroke typing this?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:06 PM
-21

What are you crying about? Who the hell is thinking about POWs and torture victims? Listen to yourself!!!
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:02 PM
-15

I mean, is that what you're doing?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 01:05 PM
5

What did she say?
/r/MensRights24/11/23 03:40 PM
4

I just don't think there should be paranoia around porn or making it out to be bad. The real issues should be talked about.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 12:34 PM
5

The problem isn't porn and you'd be crazy to think porn is stopping people from getting dates or girlfriends. You'd think you'd be able to see feminism as an easier target, or at least the volatile gender was bs people are engaged with now a days.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 12:06 PM
4

Male porn use shouldn't be demonized.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 12:01 PM
1

How does male biology hurt men?
/r/MensRights23/11/23 12:45 PM
1

Yeah, he does. You dont owe your kids that because you can't afford it, nor are your kids the children of a list wealthy celebrities.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 04:14 AM
1

"literally more than 6x the annual salary for the average american every MONTH" why do you guys keep bringing up stuff like this as if it matters? So the average american has lower living standards than a rich person so the celebrity's kids don't deserve to be adequately supported? No one is determining how much a celebrity's child support should be based off what other poorer kids can get. Sorry you're poor or whatever but thats your problem not something that their kids should have to deal wit…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 09:49 PM
0

You clearly don't know what these kids needs are so maybe you should bow out of the conversation. No amount of money would be enough to have a man with clear mental illnesses and public outburst be fit for sole custody of his children when the completely sane mother is right there.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 08:42 PM
1

m to the Bahamas that's supposed to be her dime, not his. ..I'm also not saying Kim should have to pay it all out of pocket. I'm saying she should at least pay for half shelter (in a mansion), food, clothing. I must have misunderstood what you were What point are you making? He isn't living with the kids and she is so, the financial contribution will reflect that. There are plenty of ways to wrack up that much money a month with four kids that don't even include partial rent coverage let alone t…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:14 PM
0

The other kim provides is irrelevant. That's just being a parent. If you want your kids around you need to do those things. It's not an inconvenience and it's not soemthing any decent parent would expect to be paid for. This entire paragraph say everything about your world view. Kanye should only have to give the bare minimum, which apparently should be the same as some kid who has broke parents, and anything else is for his discretion. However, Kim's providing is irrelevant because she should j…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 04:34 PM
-2

It is not. Its not a luxury tax either. Also no one is talking about vacations or gifts. Kanye still does and I'm sure still will do all those things for his kid. Why do you think she doesn't contribute? You keep making weird assumptions that all come back to you not being able to understand what it means to actually provide for a child outside of doing some standard bare minimum that you seem to think thats all his kids should be obligated to get. I'm sure Kim provides financially and frankly i…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 04:03 PM
-18

Yeah I actually can imagine how someone as wealthy as they are are spending that much per month plus some. I'm not sure why you guys are even pocket watching Kanye because he isn't complaining about this. I also don't know why you want him to contribute less to his kid's lives financially. I doubt she's using the money to pay off her mansion or whatever, I'm sure she has more than enough to provide for herself and does exactly that. I think you guys are just kind of broke and trying too hard to …
/r/MensRights22/11/23 03:55 PM
-18

I can't find anything about that but it still seems appropriate. its like 50 k per kid and they are famous celebrities so I don't see the issue.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 03:42 PM
-35

I'm pretty sure Kim spends most of the time with the kids and who knows how much he makes in reality. So, it makes sense that he has to pay this much for child support since I'm sure Kim is managing most of the financial decisions that comes with being their mother. They also have four kids so that really isn't that much for their celebrity status. I mean this could cover their school fees alone when they are all of an appropriate age.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 03:27 PM
8

Why is she always in the spotlight for someone who didn't want the royal life? Sad that feminism is getting tied to climate change...
/r/MensRights22/11/23 11:43 AM
6

It's crazy because people will really act like murderers and torturers have some moral standing that they dont.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 10:38 AM
30

Feminist basically think any sex that a woman didn't find enjoyable and wasn't something she thought to have herself with no influence from anything or anyone else is rape. It's clearly a power play to have full control by only allowing sex that would give feminists themselves power. Which is why they try to control the narrative over everything gender related. They definitely abuse the heterosexual relationship power which is why they can go into even gay or lesbian spaces and still play the vi…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 10:31 AM
2

Because they don't like it.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 03:12 PM
-16

Please stop trying to make a male community or whatever. It's corny, and we don't want a male version of feminism or whatever.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:54 PM
-10

What show would this apply to?
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:25 PM
-6

She never said that men can't have body dysmorphia.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 01:59 PM
12

Why would boys want to look up to female athletes anyway?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:09 PM
-2

Quite offended that you'd think this of all things would be me trolling, im a much better troll than that.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 07:30 AM
-2

ofc youd think that
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:10 AM
-3

What the name implies.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 05:42 AM
-2

Nothing is enough because its never existed before.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:55 AM
-7

I am not.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:42 AM
-3

First of all that is not even true, but even then women holding power is not the same thing as women holding THE power.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:42 AM
-24

Thats not a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:41 AM
-23

Austronesian societies thats not a matriarchy
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:26 AM
-4

The article even starts off questioning if matriarchy ever actually existed. Then proceeds to tell 7 situations where there were societies in which women held power. None of these are matriarchal.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:24 AM
-8

There were never any matriarchies. You may not be making this up but the people you got that from did because that's not a thing that has ever existed.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 02:21 AM
-9

You can but none of them will be matriarchies just like none of the ones you listed were.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 01:58 AM
-32

p with a fair way to establish which sex has it worse in a general sense because men and women are different. You can be more specific and make comparisons. For example, if you limit it to discriminatory laws you can make a see who has it wo There has never been a matriarchal society.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 12:10 AM
1

No I wouldn't.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 04:56 PM
1

I dont think these bodies have any authority to tell people what to do.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:31 PM
2

Who exactly are these organizations to tell countries that are probably run by religious laws how they should operate?
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:21 AM
-1

not enough
/r/MensRights13/11/23 09:20 AM
1

I'm a feminist because I actually know what feminist say and think calling someone a sexist pig for it is dumb?
/r/MensRights12/11/23 08:34 PM
0

You can feel however you want about it. "Sexist pigs" is kinda dumb though since sexism is a word feminist made up to talk about wh what? "sexist pig?" what's sexist about anything I said? i just told you the reason feminist react that way or say the things that they do.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 11:41 PM
-11

Well that's why they say it. You can feel however you want about it. "Sexist pigs" is kinda dumb though since sexism is a word feminist made up to talk about whatever they believe.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 04:17 AM
-15

The point in saying "a man committed the crime" is to point out an issue with men and male socialization to be violent and controlling. It's not a gotcha, so they don't have to care about your feelings or whatever.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 01:40 AM
0

Why would feminist fight fie men to talk about having erections?
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:01 PM
4

I do not support it. I guess if you want to argue that women working and voting is feminism then that's different but everything else about it I am not a fan of .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 01:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter