SterlingGrey Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	/r/Mensrights is once again being equated with hard core white supremacy, by reddit. Radicalized by kotaku in action??? Have you been there lately? It's not what it used to be, to say the least. "This is how you get hit with a car. Eventually people get fed up and snap."	/r/MensRights	13/08/17 03:20 PM
1	Germany rape law: 'No means No' law passed Another on is that women can change there consent at any moment before, during or after the sex. Where does it say that? And what would be the issue with being able to revoke consent before or during sex?	/r/MensRights	07/07/16 10:24 PM
4	Big argument with my sister about male reproductive rights The plural of anecdote is not data. If you believe that all accidental pregnancies were actually traps, your posts would be better suited for /r/conspiracy than here. You're making us look hysterically irrational.	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 03:13 PM
–	Big argument with my sister about male reproductive rights I never declared my stance on financial abortion, I simply took issue with your misguided belief that there's no such thing as an accidental pregnancy, that they were all secretly traps.	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 03:05 PM
–	Big argument with my sister about male reproductive rights Your arguments infantilize men, as if we do not have a personal responsibility for our own actions. Are you sure that's the stance you want to take?	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 02:51 PM
–	Big argument with my sister about male reproductive rights I responded to that by saying that women need to realize the consequences of there sexual actions Outside of cases of rape or reproductive coercion, it takes two to tango. Or are you suggesting that your partner had a personal responsibility not only for her actions, but yours as well?	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 02:42 PM
–	Big argument with my sister about male reproductive rights Most women who get pregnant made the conscious choice to let the man inside her while she was ovulating. She is the decider on whether or not she gets pregnant. (1) The reason the rhythm method is so notoriously unreliable is because ovulation is actually semi-random. (2) How is this argument in any way different than saying the man made the conscious choice to have sex without a condom? (3) Exactly what part of this argument was supposed to be logical?	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 02:38 PM
3	All 213 rape charges false: Motihari hosp - The Times of India Whatever happens to him, the authorities are likely to look the other way, the same way they would to a woman or a child of a lower caste who has clearly been raped or murdered. Let's just say it's considered newsworthy when a member of a lower caste actually gets justice.	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 02:05 AM
–	All 213 rape charges false: Motihari hosp - The Times of India Depends on what caste he's from. If he's not from a lower caste, usually nothing, as now there likely isn't a witness to his alleged crime. Honor killings are typically reserved for women and homosexual men.	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 01:54 AM
–	All 213 rape charges false: Motihari hosp - The Times of India Something tells me that their standard of proof for a false accusation wouldn't be able to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt in our courts. Many rapes are he said/she said, where not only is it very difficult, if not impossible, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a rape occured-- but also very difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a rape did not occur. This makes me question if they're classifying unfounded accusations that merely don't have the evidence to convict as fal…	/r/MensRights	27/06/16 11:09 PM