TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Stickley1 Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by Stickley1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Not bragging. Reality bites.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 04:36 PM
2

Most straight men with options might indeed get off sexually by fucking a passing, feminine, objectively hot trans girl, but most wouldn’t engage one in a *relationship.* It’s about scratching an itch, fulfilling a porn induced fetish, checking off a box on the bucket list…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 04:17 PM
9

I dunno man. I feel validated by what you’ve screenshotted. Thank you! Why might that be? First of all, of the data referring to women only, none of it hits the 50% mark. You’re quoting 43% and 23%. (Ok, but you’re saying one study at least lands in the vague ballpark of 50%. And you’ll discard the lower number! Hah!) And, next, this is the “have you ever?(even once!)” question, and not the “do you routinely?” question, which I think is more applicable to your original assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 11:56 PM
26

Your data set is biased and shouldn’t be considered representative of the population cohort. So I’ll accept at face value that you have a high lay count and your friends do too. Ok. But the girls you and your friends choose to open are not random. You select them. And you select them from a certain pool. Perhaps it’s an accurate statement that over 50% of girls you meet in bars, on Tinder, etc will fuck on the first date. But that doesn’t mean it’s an accurate statement overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 11:05 PM
2

I’m not saying that most women aren’t into men. But there’s a large enough subset of women who are quite lukewarm about them (unless a man offers her a significant boost up in social or economic status) such that it makes it very hard for the average man to pair up today. Both things can be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 01:45 PM
7

I’m not saying that most women aren’t into men. But there’s a large enough subset of women who are quite lukewarm about them (unless a man offers her a significant boost up in social or economic status) such that it makes it very hard for the average man to pair up today. Both things can be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 12:14 PM
107

A significant fraction of women just aren’t that into men. I’m not even talking about lesbians. There are just a lot of ostensibly heterosexual women, who think most men are “gross,” and who have a low sex drive. They’ll pair up with a man if he offers a significant boost in social status or economic status, but otherwise are quite happy to remain single. They just don’t need a man. And societal structures no longer force her to pair up with a man. So she doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 12:36 AM
2

Conquering the male sex drive is impossible. It’s not a choice. It’s hardwired. And evolution is always going to favor a strong male sex drive. It won’t matter in our lifetimes, but going forward, evolution will strongly select for women with sex drive. While it never mattered so much in history and prehistory, today the female sex drive is a critical trait because women have the option not to have sex. Horny women will see their genes survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 04:03 PM

Many women just aren’t as motivated to pair up. This never mattered historically because they would be forced to participate by their circumstances and their community. In the sociobiological and evolutionary sense this drive to pair up and mate and reproduce isn’t as firmly hardwired in them as it is in men. Because it wasn’t historically necessary for the survival of the organism, it often isn’t there. Men have the drive because in many/most situations in history and prehistory, not having a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:32 PM
1

There are plenty of women for whom sex and men are just meh or, worse gross. They can take it or leave it. It’s why it’s so tough for the average guy nowadays. A significant fraction of women aren’t motivated to pair up with a man unless there’s a substantial boost in status to be derived from that. Back in the day her culture and society essentially required her to pair up, and she couldn’t make a comfortable living on her own. Nowadays she can take care of herself, so why bother unless he’s a …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 03:12 PM
0

It’s biologically determined. Can’t fight Darwin. Among hominids, it never much mattered whether females wanted sex. Sex would find them. So while a female sex drive doesn’t hurt, it’s not critical to the survival of her genes. But male hominids without a sex drive simply won’t reproduce, and their genetic signal would tend to die out. So evolution supported a strong sex drive in male hominids. So today in modern humans we found ourselves in a pickle because for many women (not all) sex is a so …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 04:41 PM
3

We shouldn’t overlook the fact that there is a significant fraction of women who simply don’t have much sex drive. They may be heterosexual in orientation, but they’re not strongly motivated to have casual sex. They’re just not wired that way and they believe casual sex is “gross.”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 06:32 PM
1

Men are hardwired to want sex. In an evolutionary sense, a man who doesn’t pursue sex aggressively will lose out and his genes will disappear. In the past it never much mattered whether women wanted sex. A woman motivated to have sex could certainly find it, but even women who hated sex and hated men might find themselves reproducing despite their preferences. So there wasn’t this harsh evolutionary selection against women who didn’t have a sex drive. As a consequence, today, in general, women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 04:01 PM
2

There’s something else going on here which is driving women raising their standards. In the past, a woman needed a man. Socioeconomic forces meant that, even if she didn’t really like men, or was indifferent to them, or lesbian, or asexual, she needed a husband. Today she doesn’t. So if you remove all the women who don’t like men, are indifferent towards men, or lesbian or asexual (and this really does happen to represent a significantly larger fraction of women than the corresponding same categ…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 01:52 PM
6

Once you get to 8, and above, it really boils down to individual preferences. The level of consensus at 7 for example is going to be much much higher than agreement on 9 or 10. Your 10 is not my 10 but we probably both agree that they’re both 8’s or better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 12:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter