TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StigmaofWind Archive

View 2 posts and 31 comments by StigmaofWind on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Just post to r/anime_titties
/r/PussyPass01/08/20 05:07 AM
3

You are correct that the body has its own response, so if a man orgasms during rape his penis may be aroused but his mind and spirit are not. Therefore, no, of course it is still rape if it's against his will. Your argument,but in the case of men. Nothing changes except the person in the situation. Rape is rape, whether it's female on male or male on female.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/20 07:39 PM
6

So that girl got wet and orgasmed during rape,huh? Well, I think not, since she obviously was excited and enjoyed it if she orgasmed. Not rape in that case, is it? /s This is how your argument sounds.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 06:17 AM
1

Have you been 13 years old? At that age all it takes to get rock hard is a passing thought or a doodle you drew on your book. And 13 isn't exactly a time when you know how to control your mini-me. So a full grown woman with breasts and ass coming at you can involuntarily make you hard, even if you don't want to. It doesn't have anything to do with enjoyment, it's a reaction of the hormones running wild in your teenage body.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 06:15 AM
1

When the violator is a woman, there are going to be female police officers to take them down physically. Female on female molestation doesn't fly like a male on female. If a female police officer comes up against a male troublemaker, then they have a gun to deter him rrom atacking or to incapacitate him if he attacks. I'm arguing that having female officers isn't just for social justuce reasons. And yes, if the woman attacks an officer and can't be contained or reasoned with, then I'd rather the…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 02:17 PM
1

When it's a situation where either you kill or get killed, you choose to kill, every damn time. Also, there are non-lethal ways to use a gun. Like shooting out the other guys kneecaps or atleast at his legs. Pretty sure they won't attack anyone in that state.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 01:16 PM
1

Sure, but what happens when the troublemaker is a woman? The woman can claim that a male officer tried to molest her during the arrest, opening an innocent officer to persecution, even if the allegation doesn't stick for long.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 01:15 PM
1

Doesn't mean they won't die when shot, does it?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 12:56 PM
1

Thereby choking them?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 12:55 PM
-4

I think guns are the great equalizer for police work. Even if an assailant is bigger than you, they'll hesitate if you have a gun. But you can't exactly scare fire with a bullet, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 10:27 AM
3

Not just carpet burns though. The person who's being dragged will have his head smash onto multiple steps untill they reach the ground floor. And you can't slowly ease him down while a building is burning down around you, so if he wasn't dead by smoke inhalation, he'll be dead by blunt force trauma, by the time someone drags him out.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 10:22 AM
4

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.townsvillebulletin.com.au/news/national/girlfriend-bailed-as-mother-of-deceased-escorted-from-court/news-story/d6aa67a8da64d132a691d6dd301ddcd4
/r/MensRights01/03/20 09:02 AM
34

That's a great family custom. My family has a few trials we have to pass before we're even taught how to drive. 1.We have to learn how to properly wash a car by hand, no automatic car washes. 2.We have to learn how to change a tire by ourselves without assistance, both during the day and at night. 3.Simple things like checking the brake fluid, oil levels, wiper fluid, filling air in the tires and also how to jump start a car.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:49 AM
1

I'm against people who try to use falsehoods like the wage gap to try and discredit the hard work and sacrifice people put in to get to where they are. I'm against people who try to shit on companies for looking out for thenselves, juat because they're rich and nobody likes anything that is more successful than themselves and all money should belong to the workers. If people want to make better wages, then they should put in more work and if that means sacrificing having children, that's what yo…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 08:14 PM
2

No because you're a random fucktard on the internet. And in the eyes of the company a pregnant woman is taking time off just because some guy came inside her. Their productivity shouldn't have to suffer for some persons life choices and they shouldn't have to bend over backwards for that person.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 07:52 PM
3

Skill level should be proven with performance after coming back from leave. She should start out at the position she held before going on leave and should not be given allowances. She can't just come back and demand the same pay as her continuously working colleagues. Even when the skill levels are similar, peiority is given to those with higher work experience. That is, active work experience, not counting long leaves of abscence. Ofcourse the person with a continuous work history is going to h…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 07:50 PM
3

Well, then I guess you have no problem sending me a 1000$ every month, then.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 07:45 PM
3

Source? Also, even if that were true, which I doubt, then the fact that the man is earning money( especially if he was earning more money than the woman from the start) should exepmt him from doing the other 20%. Still waiting for a source on those statistics from a reliable forum.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 05:51 PM
2

No they shouldn't. Companies run for making profit, not to facilitate the family fantasies of their employees. Especially not at the cost of other people losing their raises just because a woman decided to have a baby and traipse off for months on end. And definitely not at the cost of that person getting preferential treatment and raises that they did not work hard on. 2 months of paternity leave versus atleast 15 months of dedicated child care. Yeah,seems like equality.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 04:52 PM
3

You're assuming that men aren't contributing anything in the form of domestic responsibilities while in most cases, men cook, clean and take care of the children for a good long amount of time. If you want an exact split of every responsibility then: The woman should be bringing in just as much money as the man,which is quite possible nowadays because of better qualifications and work ethics. They should also perform intensive labor around the house. A woman is just as capable of cutting down a …
/r/MensRights26/02/20 04:48 PM
3

women are unfairly penalized for being their gender and fulfilling their necessary reproductive function Are you saying that a company should pay someone to do something that benefits them in no way, shape or form for atleast 15 months and then let that someone return to their job with seniority similar to people who kept working during those 15 months when the woman was busy taking care of her own business? Also, the human population is 7 billion, going on 8, strong. It's pretty safe to say tha…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 04:31 PM
10

Are you saying that a person who took atleast around 15 months off for a personall reason should have the same seniority and pay as someone,male or female, who worked for the company full-time during that same period in the same position as the woman on pregnancy leave?
/r/MensRights26/02/20 04:23 PM
7

So men should get paid for things they do around their own houses, like cleaning, cooking, repairs, maintenance, gardening, plumbing etc. Right?
/r/MensRights26/02/20 04:20 PM
8

It isn't really possible to remove Mera from Aquaman, atleast not if they're going with an extended timeline that resembles the comic source. Best they can do is recast Mera. Or not involve Atlantis at all in future movies and just have Aquaman say that Mera is ruling the Kingdom for him during his adventures.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 08:05 AM
4

Not an American. Still think it's fair that she suffer for almost destroying a persons life. minor misconduct. It wouldn't have been so minor if her threats had gone through. Assault charges are no joke. He would've been listed as a predator for the rest of his life. He would've lost his job, his home, his relationships, his life..... everything. He would never find honest work again. No one would trust him. Even if he's found innocent, he'd still be stigmatized and ostracized. Because no one wa…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/20 11:07 AM
17

How long would the man have paid the price if he didn't have that recording? He would've been convicted of assault and still be in jail and have his life ruined forever. In comparison, she's getting off easy right now.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/20 10:21 AM
5

It wasn't just an argument though. She was threatening to report him and use her status and position to ruin that guys life. "Who do you think they'll believe,you or me? I work at the DAs office." If threatening to misuse your position and authority, which are supposed to be used to protect the common folk, don't make you eligible to get fired, then what does?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/20 10:16 AM
6

I think what they meant is the double standards. Some women who want 6+ foot guys with 6 figure salaries and super model features don't seem to be able to understand that such men might also have preferences. Most insanely sucessful men just aren't going to want an average Jane who works evening shifts at the local supermarket and never went to college. They want women on their own levels of ambition and success. And these women get offended by that. Also, these women with unusually high standar…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/19 07:39 PM
2

Who cares what anyone says? People don't have to explain their sex life to strangers on the internet. If calling out something that shows a blatant discrimination between men and women is going to get me called an incel, I sure as hell don't care. Feminazis are the worst when you cone down to it. These idiots think every guy who doesn't agree with them is an incel because they're projecting the fact that they haven't gotten any in years.
/r/PussyPass19/12/19 06:55 PM
5

What else would you call it? If it were a man instead of a woman, no matter the mental issue, he would be titled as a rapist, predator and charged for murder. But because she's a woman, she gets manslaughter, even though she said she enjoyed killing.
/r/PussyPass19/12/19 06:49 PM
91

Yeah. If you're a male, unless your partner cheated on you, don't expect any mercy on that sub, at all. Yesterday a guy pointed out how it works by showing previous posts and responses to them. Scenario 1: OP gets an inheritance or bonus. Spouse has debt. Spouse wants OP to give them money to pay off the debt. Will OP be an asshole if they don't give their money to Spouse to pay off the debt? If OP is male and Spouse is female. Judgement: You are The Asshole Comments: If you love your wife, why …
/r/MGTOW20/11/19 12:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter