TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StillNoFriendss Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by StillNoFriendss on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

LMAO First of all "mate" is not a scientific term you dolt, and I don't know how I can describe how awkward it is that you think that it is. It's just a word, and within this context in English it is nearly universally used to describe an animal with another animal. No one has ever said "I am looking to find a mate" unless they are really really socially akward. Yes in very particular circumstances it is used in a scientific paper, but the majority of scientists would use the word "partner" inst…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 06:17 PM
0

God there is nothing more cringey than someone who refers to a person looking for a relationship as looking for a "mate." Humans look for partners/relationships/spouses. Animals look for mates. I don't know how you don't know that at your age... but here we are.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:48 PM
1

Only if they're being deliberately dishonest. Appearance is an innate characteristic I'm speechless LOL Ok one more time all you have to do is say yes or no. You think that it is LESS shallow for a man to only date women who please their eyes. As in they don't care about anything else including what their hobbies are, what their interests are, what their goals/dreams are, what they are looking for in a family, nothing. Than a woman to only date men with a good job. As in they don't care about an…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:30 PM
0

Men may aspire to attracting the attention of beautiful women, but it cannot be “shallow” for the same reason my desire to impoverish everyone just to go into space cannot be “greedy”. It may be a ridiculous and immature desire, but that lack of power in being able to achieve that goal is what invalidates it from having the same charge as the obverse. LOOOOL Jesus christ man I haven't laughed this hard in a while. Keep doing what you do bro.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:36 PM
1

LOL Someone can easily turn that around and say that men aren't attracted to the person (I.E their personality, their beliefs, etc), they are attracted to how their looks fulfill their sexual desires. It's so incredibly telling that you have no issue with the ways men are typically portrayed as shallow, but have every issue with the way women are.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:42 PM
7

Ok... but im using actual logic to support my position. All OP has is "woman bad, so my theory is this." OP clearly had no idea who his wife was, and made this post without knowing she is by far the more financially successful partner.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:15 PM
4

Brady is getting offered 375 million for a 10 year contract. Which comes out to 37.5 million a year. His wife makes 40 million a year. Lol.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:13 PM
5

Uh... wouldn't it make more sense for her to divorce him after that money comes in if that's the case?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:07 PM
2

Lmao you literally can't even admit that they are the same exact level of shallow. Yikes.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:56 PM
1

Uh... alright. Thank you for that random tidbit of information that has nothing to do with what I asked. Ill rephrase my question. Why is it more shallow for a woman to be in a relationship with someone solely for their status, than it is for a man to be in a relationship with a woman solely for her looks.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:37 PM
-3

You find gold diggers to be less shallow than the men who marry them just for their looks? That's weird.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:29 PM
13

His wife is one of the most successful models on the planet lol. She is worth over 100 million more than Brady.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:22 PM
12

She would need to prove her need for spousal support to the courts. I'm not entirely sure how a woman worth 400 millon dollars (over 100 million more than Brady), who makes 40 million a year (2.5 million more than Brady), is going to prove to a judge that she is in need of spousal support.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:19 PM
2

Lmao you're the one bitching about an inoffensive phrase from a show. Im guessing you were from an Airforce family, seems anout your kinda speed.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 10:05 PM
2

I mean I'm an ex-Marine and was fighting in Iraq before I was 19. What were you doing at 19? Bitching about feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 09:53 PM
2

I know your kids are growing up with an ignorance glorifying parent, and that blows.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 09:23 PM
1

Lmao way to double down on being a fucking idiot. Congrats hopefully your kids don't emulate your ignorance.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 09:12 PM
1

Not the point dumbass, people who don't watch that shit and only see what's been sold in that shop see something else,double entendre get it? Then they can fucking educate themselves genius LOL imagine glorifying being ignorant, what a tool. With everything going on today you can't say this,you can't say that but that's ok? Equality my ass I have to know what a shitty program has it in context to make it ok! Fuck outta here Yes you fucking idiot, because its not fucking offensive LMAO. You are d…
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 09:04 PM
1

OP ten bucks says you complain about woke people being too sensitive all the time.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 08:48 PM
1

God this is so fucking stupid lmao. By men it's refering to humanity. All men must die as in everyone has to die some day.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 08:46 PM
1

LOL no it doesn't, and no you don't.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 10:08 PM
1

Nah its just making fun of people who arent being persecuted but still pretend to be. You know the type. Like the conservatives who were acting persecuted when gay marriage was legalized. I'm sure you weren't one of them though. wink
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 02:45 PM
1

Yeah that's your persecution fetish for ya. Nobody said you weren't allowed to be passionate about men's problems lmao. No one said anything about rules either. Again I was just pointing out how funny it was that the mere mention of a problem women have faced, made you go on a rant about how awful it is to be a man. This is not complicated.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 02:42 PM
1

Yeah... not surprised you are incapable of understanding my comment. My point was to make fun of you for going on a whataboutmen rant, in response to someone who just said a single sentence about a problem women have faced. They didn't even mention men lmao. And the end was just super cringey, and /r/persecutionfetish material.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 02:07 PM
0

Hears a random fact about women Proceeds to go on a really akward and unasked for rant about the struggles of men
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 12:27 PM
1

God what a fucking idiot lmao. Shes a tradcon wife, not a feminist 🤦
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 12:16 PM
1

Lol why did you include two random pictures in that?
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 12:13 PM
1

I scrolled through it, I'm not really seeing a lot of misandry lol. But you agree with what I said right? All anti feminists are women hating incels right?
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:20 PM
1

The only sub you mentioned that is filled with sexism is fourthwavefemenism. If you want to judge all feminists by their most extreme forms, then that means I can claim that all anti feminists are hateful incels right? Afterall the incel community is filled with anti feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 02:14 AM
1

Actually I think you managed to make progress when you admitted I was right about it being a right only women have. Im looking high and low through my comment and I can't seem to find where I said that. Are you blind as well as stupid? Or maybe you have the ability to see invisible words? The right to a fair trial is not a reproductive right. The ability to establish a defense for yourself is not a reproductive right. You sound like a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:54 PM
1

Ahhh the "LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU LALALA" type of argument. That was really popular when I was in elementary school.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:38 PM
1

is your brain not well enough developed to understand what I'm saying? Yeah what you said really looks fucking dumb after its pointed out to you doesn't it? The ability to use the temporary insanity a woman experiences after birth as a defense for infanticide isn't a fucking reproductive right. It's not considered a reproductive right by definition, and its not considered a reproductive right anywhere. Well except here of course, but most of the people on this sub are pretty stupid so that's not…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:33 PM
1

... But it's not a fucking right LOL You go to prison. It's illegal. You don't have the right to kill your kid. It's literally the same thing as an insanity plea, only it involves insanity caused by child birth. Jesus Christ you people are really fucking dumb.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:05 PM
1

The commenter stated it like it's just another option. Like "whoopsies I forgot to abort my baby guess ill just kill it." It is still a felony and carrys a prison sentence and all the other fun things that being a felon brings. Do you have a problem with insanity pleas in general, or is it only when women use it?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:27 PM
1

Yeah that didn't do much to refute my transphobia accusation lol. No surprise transphobes are usually extremely dumb.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:25 PM
-1

Doesn’t that seem homophobic? They are invalidating gay men’s sexuality by saying it’s disgusting to be attracted to men. Idk. This is such a massive stretch LOL Why not pick a real example of homophobia said by a feminist. “Men make up the majority of rape/violent criminals” This isn't racist. This is the same argument racists make against black people. And it is insane to me that they don’t think of this considering how common this argument is made against black people. You know, the “despite …
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:20 PM
1

women have additional rights post-birth such as infanticide law You aren't suggesting that women are allowed to legally kill their babies right?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:13 PM
1

Where? Show me an example where the father isnt able to take legal action. he couldn't
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:11 PM
1

The punchline is he's transphobic lol.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:09 PM
1

/r/onejoke
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:08 PM
1

Obviously
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:06 PM
2

Nice creative story bro. Jk this was really poorly written, you should pay more attention in school.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:04 PM
-29

What.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:24 PM
-49

Man how will they cope knowing this guy who would never have supported women before, will not support them?!?!
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:04 PM
-2

Something like 80% of all violent crime is committed by men lol.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 01:02 PM
-2

Im confused what the issue with that article is exactly.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 12:55 PM
-5

Where is the "men bad" part of that? What's your issue with the article?
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 12:53 PM
-1

Individual feminists & feminist organisations constantly lobby for ever-more privileges, advantages, special treatment and benefits for women. Like what.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 12:34 PM
-2

Reread your feminist propaganda: switch the word men to jew and place in 1938. Gonna be a great laugh. Lmao this really doesn't work when you realize that that "feminist propaganda" doesn't include lines like "all men are bad" or whatever the fuck you think it does.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 12:32 PM
-2

They aren't killing a child either, so doesn't seem like there is any difference.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 03:07 PM
1

If you constantly spout common incel talking points, usually you are an incel. Here is the comment I originally made. Now there is an interesting word I used there. Its called usually which is a way of saying "often, but not always". Are there any other words in that sentence you don't understand? I'm all for helping people out with English. I can break down the sentence a bit more for you if you need.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 10:08 PM
0

Jessie... What the fuck are you talking about? If you are a fuckboy, who says thinks things like "I am a virgin because women are all x who only have sex with chads and also I'm a perma virgin because my wrists are small" than you probably aren't a fuckboy, you are an incel. Whats going on man? Are you feeling alright?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 09:49 PM
-1

What? Those are all other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 09:23 PM
-5

If you constantly spout common incel talking points, usually you are an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:52 PM
5

I'm the kind of person that would ask a gay guy why he is gay. Is that bad or something? No. Its just really fucking stupid lol. Why are you straight? I don't think there's any trauma so bad that you can't work through it in a few weeks Ah you are trolling I see. Well done.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 03:04 PM
13

Okay, but why are they asexual? This guy had no idea that was a sexual orientation. A reasonable amount of time is like.. a few weeks maybe? Wow a few weeks? You are all heart. I don't know, are all of her holes out of commission or what? I'm assuming this is talking about pussy problems, and in that case, I think we could find something that works Prince charming over here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 02:49 PM
-2

I can promise you that there will more men who will be gangraped Oh boy. The fact that you are so clueless about war Oh boy. Look an armchair soldier is telling me he understands war more than someone who has been in a war. But lets ignore that. How am I clueless exactly? I did not say that I think women are the primary victims of war, I did not say that men are not murdered, I did not say that men are not tortured, I did not say that men are not raped. Your ridiculous victim complex that you ha…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:45 PM
0

You are talking as if sexual abuse doesn't happen to men in wars. No I'm not. high time you do some reading I am already well aware of it. Is there anyone else here who is going to try and tell me what I said based off of purposly misinterpreting what I said? Im sure at this point someone will throw in how I think only women fight wars, and men have never died in a war. This is the problem with this subreddit, so much of the content is just people willingly misinterpreting what others say, so th…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:33 PM
1

was talking about there being more male victims overall, especially with regards to torture and deaths. You originally said that literally women are not gang raped to death in occupations. Complete, and total nonsense as everyone without an agenda to push would point out. When I gave you examples that completey disprove that statement, you say "what about the men." I didn't say there were no male victims in Nanjing, I brought it up to call you on your bullshit. Pretending that there are no femal…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:54 PM
-6

As opposed to many more men who were raped, YOU THINK MORE MEN WERE RAPED THAN WOMEN IN NANJING?!?!?!? Ok I think I am done here, thats all I needed to see lmao.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:32 PM
-12

You're insisting on the moot point that because a handful of women has it worse than thousands of men, "women have it worse than men" Stop putting words in my mouth, I was explaining where people who argue that are coming from. I never insisted on anything lol. I am not saying that more women are raped than men are killed. When women are victimized in war they are usually raped, or enslaved (usually sexual slavery). When men are victimized in war they are usually killed, or enslaved (usually phy…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:30 PM
-7

Literally doesn't happen to females in war. Only gangraped? Maybe. .... Are you being serious lol? It is theorized that nearly every woman in Berlin, and Nanjing was raped. Girls as young as 7 and women as old as 80. And that is just 2 cities in 1 war And many were killed, especially in Nanjing because rape was "illegal" in the Japanese army, and dead people tell no tales. I thought this was a legitimate subreddit? Did I accidentally make my way into /r/conspiracy? Denying facts only serve to hu…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:58 PM
-16

Yes I agree. I figured the article was talking about wars in general and not just the Ukraine conflict. I would rather be killed (the traditional way men are treated by invaders), than to become a sex slave to the people who murdered your family (the traditional way women are treated). If you claim to disagree with that statement, you are a liar.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:52 PM
-26

I think its considered better to die in a war, than to be gangraped to death in front of your family. Thats probably where people are coming from when they say women exoerience the worst of war. Being a former Marine, I can whole heartly agree with that thought process.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:15 PM
1

Eh I thought it was just used to mean something like hateful virgin?
/r/MensRights17/04/22 09:29 PM
1

What are you advocating for here exactly? Should men be issued a companion or something?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:52 PM
18

Holy fuck somebody said something reasonable.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter