TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StockholmMeatball Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by StockholmMeatball on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

One for your penis, and one for each ear. Then you'll look like an elephant! Fun!
/r/askTRP18/03/14 11:49 PM
2

She gets work release.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 06:06 PM
14

I have an adult male friend who recently lost his father. He of course had to tell his work that he had to to take some time off for the funeral, travel, and arrangements. His work very thoughtfully gave him a card expressing their sympathy for his loss. Another friend, an adult female, recently got a DUI. It was not her first offense, and she is going to have to spend a few weeks in jail, being let out during the day for work release. She of course also had to tell her work of the situation. Sh…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:32 AM
1

20 years ago kids played all the time without supervision. It's creepy how parents think kids need to have an ever watching eye these days. It hinders there development.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:47 PM
1

To charge someone with manslaughter there has to be some kind of negligence or fault.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:45 PM
18

If the man stick figure is 6 ft tall, the small one has to be about 3.5 ft. Clearly it's not a child, it's a midget lover.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 09:57 PM
3

There's nothing wrong with her being taller, or wearing heals and it happens to make her taller. There is a problem if she does it to manipulate and shit test. We all want to find out if our potential mates are good people, with a lack of shortcomings. However, that doesn't entitle us to manipulate and scheme. A responsible healthy person will find these things out organically and naturally, not by manipulation and control. Note the end result is to find out if he has any "macho insecurities". I…
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:45 AM
5

I don't quite understand this one. The author explicitly says the couple has just started dating. She goes on to talk about things to do before the first time they have sex, etc. So if they just started dating, are clearly not monogamous, why on earth would either of them not still be playing the field? They just started dating. They aren't in a committed monogamous relationship. Why would it be evidence that he is a bad person if he hasn't already committed himself to a woman he doesn't really …
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:37 AM
2

Becoming? That ship sailed long ago my friend.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:44 AM
1

I agree it isn't fair, but what he's saying is it's a pragmatic decision, the motivations probably aren't out of a desire simply to harm some people due to their sex. The end result is some people will be in greater harm because of their sex, but he's just saying that probably isn't the primary motivation.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:48 PM
1

Misandry don't real. /s
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:03 PM
17

Because anyone who posts in here is a legitimate MRA and not a troll.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 09:20 AM
2

Still, to casually threaten aborting her exs unborn child out of spite, I think it's safe to say, bullet dodged.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 09:43 PM
3

Wow. Imagine being the kid and finding that out when it gets older. "Mommy would have killed me if I had had a different Daddy." What a lovely woman. I'm glad you aren't with her anymore.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:08 PM
1

This isn't about sex or gender. This is about one parent being active in a child's life, and the other not. Just testify honestly, it isn't your fault if courts are biased, and in this case, the end result of that bias will probably be in the best interests of the child anyway. I'm not saying bias is ok, I'm just saying there probably will be no real victim of it in this case.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:21 PM
2

That's horrible, but now I'm curious. Did she determine it was yours and get it aborted, or did she determine it wasn't and have it?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:12 PM
-1

That's better trolling. Good job.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:58 PM
2

Isn't that what got him into this mess?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:34 PM
13

It's classic dehumanization of one group to enable another group to have fewer moral qualms about abusing them.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:22 AM
18

The mental gymnastics required for that argument is astounding. Wouldn't just be easier for them to argue women should have a license to kill?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:20 AM
22

It's perfectly ok to defend yourself with deadly force if you legitimately fear for your life or serious harm. But cold blooded vengeful murder? Uh, there is a difference. How she can try to substitute one for the other is beyond me.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:19 AM
1

To be honest, if she doesn't reciprocate his first advance or two, that's message enough. It isn't a person's responsibility to have a chat diagramming how they aren't interested in someone else every time someone throws themselves at them. Why should she be obligated? If she doesn't reciprocate advances, is painfully obvious she isn't interested. Continuing under the guise of "well she didn't say she was uninterested" is just an excuse for harassment. And that's pretty much why it's an example …
/r/MensRights01/12/13 04:35 PM
1

I have masculine features. Some women love it. Others are attracted to pretty boys, which I am not. Not knowing a stranger's preference off the bat, I'll interact with both. If they're attracted to me, they love my behavior. If not, I'm a creep just for talking to them. Behavior is identical in both cases. It really does come down to whether or not you're attractive to them.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 04:27 PM
1

The only partner this kind of attitude gets is one who will accept being treated like a show pony. If that's what you really want, have at it, but the average person typically wants a partner with a little spine and character. But by all means, filter those people out; frankly, we appreciate it.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:56 PM
5

Oh boy! Oral sex from a 51 year old child molester. Yippee!
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:38 AM
5

How about her admission of guilt, and the photos of her genitals she texted him? Is that enough evidence of sexual abuse?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:37 AM
4

She sent him photos of her genitals too. It's extremely likely she performed oral sex on him as well like he claims.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:36 AM
2

Men have different physiology than women. We need more protein, even if not exercising a lot. If exercising a lot we need way, way more. Complaining that a product being advertised as high in protein and pitched to men is like complaining that tampon commercials are pitched to women. The only people who care if Greek yogurt has higher protein than regular are people who need more protein in their diet. Typically men. Big whoop.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:41 PM
1

TIL feminists don't know the difference between vaginas and vulvas.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:35 PM
16

Well you wouldn't want to hurt her feelings would you?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:24 AM
2

Explaining why weekend sentences exist doesn't mean he supports what's happened in this instance. Can't someone inform other people of the world without being accused of advocating for it?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:22 AM
2

I don't really agree with how the impeachment of President Clinton for perjury came about, however, I do think perjury alone is reasonable for impeachment. That holds for George W., Cheney, and the new cronies in office now. They're all crooks.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:20 AM
1

She isn't going to prison, she is going to jail. And it is fairly common for judges to allow jail sentences of less than a year to be served on weekends. I don't agree with it in this case, but it isn't abnormal.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:18 AM
3

I don't see what you guys are mad about. This going to totally but a damper on her weekend social life.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:18 AM
0

When did I ever say anything about upvoting, downvoting, and moving on? Point it out.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:53 AM
1

You should put that on your resume.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:46 AM
7

Hey everyone, it's really important we draw the line where catsnstuff97 says so. Because.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:07 AM
2

How? By making a dumb thread like this? Newsflash: This isn't the first time someone's had your brilliant idea. Guess what? It doesn't do shit. Except annoy everyone with the same demands that people self censor and talk about whatever it is you think they should talk about.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:06 AM
14

I like how it's his fault she threw a tantrum.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 11:10 AM
6

Not only is she potentially ruining your life for a "joke", but she is using what's happened to rape victims as the ammunition. What a lovely person.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 06:34 AM
3

Get out.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:28 AM
16

Hey man, I understand your anger. But leave the horse out of it.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:44 PM
2

Exactly. Why on earth would she want to "take it slow"? She already said she wants to jump to it, but doesn't know how to execute.
/r/seduction28/04/13 08:13 PM
1

Oh whatever. Live a little.
/r/seduction28/04/13 08:12 PM
2

See ya.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:41 AM
47

Feminism in a nut ovaryshell. PIG
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:30 PM
8

I guessed correctly too. The bombings were not carried out by NRA members. I guess all non-NRA members should be vilified Michael?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:53 PM
0

Whoosh
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:15 AM
-1

Only an animal would say that.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:07 AM
3

Good for you for breaking up with her man. Men out there that take abuse just enables it and entrenches the behavior in the culture. Kudos.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:06 AM
25

"Whoa whoa whoa whoa! You conned this woman into ending a pregnancy who conned you into impregnating her? You beast!"
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:48 PM
9

Uh yeah, actually it is.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 12:19 PM
-1

Don't draw attention to haters, it only empowers them.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:56 AM
1

It's always the ones who have never been in a fight, or never shot a gun, or never had someone trying to kill them.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:55 AM
5

You are victimized as a woman, at some point, in some way. For instance some schmuck at an auto repair place may assume you don't know what they're talking about because you're a "little lady". Or maybe someone won't take you seriously for some other random topic that is supposed to be male dominated. In fact you are being victimized as a woman for being told you are just to "young and pretty" to understand what's wrong with you supporting equality for men as well as women. Ironic, isn't it? Sup…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:12 AM
7

The upside is there are a lot of women out there who believe in equality, with whom you can have a relationship and will treat you fairly. Because the system is unfair, you have to be extra careful about who you wind up with, and who you risk trying to make a family with and start a life. But just because the system is biased, it doesn't mean every woman out there will try to take advantage of unfairness.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:02 AM
0

Why exactly do we care what a misandric beast thinks?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:07 AM
1

Every week one of you guys comes out of the woodwork demanding people in this subforum only talk about what you think we should talk about. It's getting old.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:42 AM
12

Man, they can't even troll well. Weak.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:01 PM
3

At least once a month someone makes a post about how they think the subreddit should talk about what they think is important. There are lots of threads that are doing what you think this subreddit should be doing. If there is a thread that isn't doing what you think we should be doing, suck it up. We aren't a collective with one opinion, and when an opinion contrary to yours shows up, it doesn't mean there is something wrong.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:43 AM
2

You were struck in the face and you're saying "it was a one time thing"...
/r/MensRights28/12/12 11:57 PM
5

My mother was extremely abusive, my father was not. That's what turned me on to mens rights. Often times people who criticize the mens rights movement do so thinking if you support it, you've had problems in romantic relationships with women. My experience was being a powerless child abused by an adult, and blamed for the abuse anytime I reached out for help because the adult was a woman. If they can blame a child for an adult womans abuse, how can they possibly treat an adult man fairly? That's…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 11:56 PM
0

Electromagnetic radiation covers the entire frequency spectrum, so that includes harmless long wavelengths, and dangerous high energy short wavelengths, like ultraviolet light, x-rays, and gamma rays. Communication and radar use microwaves, they do not use high energy wavelengths. Microwaves are non-ionizing, so they are safe, with an exception. Microwaves can cause heating, so while you can happy absorb them all day at a reasonably low enough power, with no accumulating effect, if you absorbed …
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:51 PM
3

Your average woman would never dream of doing such a thing, but there are occasional nutjubs from both sexes. Based on what the OP described of his former lover, I think her actually capable of doing that. She sounds crazy.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:10 PM
6

He wasn't trying to make a photo copy of the original picture. He used it as a basis to create another work, another work which draws attention to something he felt important. It doesn't mean he necessarily supports it.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 05:43 PM
2

Placing your genitals on a piece of bread doesn't mean it grew testicles.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:11 PM
61

I don't necessarily think he was trying to say its ok. In fact I see something that is complained a lot in here being represented in the painting. A man assaulted by a woman, and her feeling nothing except slight bemusement over it. Just because he painted it, doesn't mean he supports it, and in fact he may have been trying to shine light on the problem and double standard.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:23 PM
1

I hear ya. I think it's because "radiation" is such a broad term, and people generally only hear it in a dangerous context, and they grow to think it always means something dangerous.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:17 PM
8

It is bullshit. The argument is probably that airline pilots are exposed to more radiation than the average person, which is actually true, but they are certainly not sterilized from it.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:28 AM
14

It is very, very unlikely this child is yours. Do not sign anything, fight any child support attempts, and demand a paternity test. To help you understand your situation, condoms are 85% effective with typical use, that is to say if a typical couple uses them for birth control, they have a 15% chance of pregnancy after a year. Pulling out has a typical effectiveness of 73%. So 15% x 27% = 4%. But you only had sex with her 3 times. Couples in their 20s, on average, have sex 112 times per year. Th…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:25 AM
3

Even if you accept her made up statistics, she is using them to try to claim that if there are a greater percentage of women who suffer due to their sex, none of the men who suffer due to theirs matters. There is something inherently wrong with any argument that tries to claim victims of injustice don't matter because there is another group that are victims too. It's like saying racism against hispanics is ok because blacks were slaves. It just doesn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:23 AM
1

If said private documents show she is a threat to herself or others then the threat outweighs the privacy. Like I said, if someone is a threat to themself or others, health care professionals are required to report them, and they have a legal responsibility to follow rigorous privacy guidelines otherwise. This man has no such responsibility, and I am suggesting he only follow the much more rigorous expectations of a health care professional (or at least getting them to weigh in on the matter), a…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:53 AM
2

The woman wrote a suicide note saying goodbye to her children. Often times when women decide to commit suicide, they think the children are better off coming with them. What exactly is reprehensible about making the courts aware of a potentially hazardous situation? Even mental health care professionals are required by law to notify law enforcement if they think a patient is a danger to others. This gentleman is certainly in no position of expertise to be deciding what is a genuine threat and wh…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:35 AM
2

If he did cheat, I don't understand why. Her being such a warm, caring woman. How could he ever be tempted into another's arms? Impossible.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:36 PM
1

Did you see how she stopped attacking him, then heard the police were coming, then went all out attacking him again and trying to get a response out of him? She wanted him to respond to try to get the altercation blamed on him. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:33 PM
12

I get what you're saying, but he's just giving advice for the next time you run into an unfair situation. We know what happened wasn't fair, but there was something you could have done that would have worked out best for you, and possibly may have had ramifications for this woman targeting you. Instead, your actions wound up getting you fired, and her behavior rewarded, despite the fact that it was unfair to you.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:16 PM
7

QED
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:30 PM
12

And if you try showing how the result was reached and why it is misleading, you're sexist! Who knew math had a gender bias.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:37 AM
1

It's a mole and it's his one redeeming character in my opinion. He could have it removed if he was vain, but obviously he sees it as a part of his face so he just leaves it. The only part of him I've seen so far that deserves respect.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:32 PM
1

If the property is used as a wild park, there isn't much maintenance required.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:30 PM
4

RIP
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:59 PM
2

If you ever find the what happened is effecting your life, and you discover that there may not be a support system for you to turn to, come back here and ask what to do.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:19 PM
1

Anecdotally I have seen that it is much more acceptable by society for a woman to be violent towards a man than the other way around. I personally have been attacked by women much more often than men, and also for more trivial reasons.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:46 AM
3

This literally may be the biggest opportunity you will ever have in your life to oppose a truly evil person to the best of your ability. I think you will deeply regret letting this drop instead of going after her. Please, please, make this psychopath pay for trying to ruin your life.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:36 PM
2

Same rule in my elementary school. Boys can't wear hats because we're all violent and might be in a gang, girls can because they like fashion more and it might complete their outfit. Wut?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:51 AM
-3

An inkling of intelligence.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:14 AM
-4

If you can't identify the difference between humor and blatant attempts at control veiled as humor, you shouldn't be attempting relationships.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:18 AM
5

Kind of like when a man tongue-in-cheek controls every action of his wife. It's funny!
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:58 AM
3

Typically proving someone attacked someone else with a deadly weapon is enough. You know, shooting at them, stabbing them, hitting them with a car...
/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:24 PM
1

Yeah, skirts are for girls! Wear a kilt like a man god damn it!
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:48 PM
0

Good for you man. You being 17, I would recommend you start thinking of yourself as a young man, and not a boy. It's a healthy mindset you can draw strength from when criticized for doing what you think is best for you.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:47 PM
-1

I don't defend what he said, however he isn't attacking her because she's a woman, he's attacking her because she ruined someone's life. It's sexist to think a man is misogynistic simply for saying how much they hate a woman.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:39 AM
1

Yeah totally. Future employers or colleges totally won't care if someone can't manage getting better than a C in a high school class.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter