~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is there such a thing as Liberal red pillers?Easily the most annoying thing about TRP was its obsession with Donald Trump at some point. Despite the fact that his wife openly flirted with other world leaders in front of him and rejected his advances in public regularly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/21 01:58 PM |
| 1 | Why do men act like women wanting serious relationships in their 20s are crazy and too young to want marriage but shame women in their 30s for being old and “ran through”?Because men aren't a monolith | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/11/21 09:30 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedThis is you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/11/21 09:11 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedThis is true | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 03:16 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedAlso I'm not equating anything, say they're just sparring. No winners or losers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 12:45 PM |
| -1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedNot necessarily no. I'd argue typically. But I agree it's not necessary | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 12:43 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedI would be surprised and feel different too, it’s uncommon/taboo for men who aren’t gay to talk about anal/pegging. So it is different to you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 12:14 PM |
| 7 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedYou gonna lie or just tell him it's none of his business | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 12:13 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedOkay in your earlier comment you said that the act is just as risky, but really only one sex is risking their body or internal organs. The chances of infertility for women with HPV is astronomical in men it's practically zero. Pregnancy might have an emotional toll on a man, but it won't affect any of my organs at all. Practically every single organ in the body of a women is severely changed during pregnancy. Even hormonally post sex, men decrease in oxytocin while women increase in it. No matte… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 12:12 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedBack to the earlier example, is the guy who gets beaten in 150 rounds of boxing the same as the guy who beats up boxers in 150 rounds. Are they doing the same thing? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 11:59 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedYeah that's one of the differences. I'm not gonna see a town that submissively opened its gates for conquering warlords the same way I'll see the conquering armies. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 11:53 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedIsn't that just kinda a form of narcissicm? It's extremely important to me therefore it must be extremely important to others. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 11:51 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedIt is an organised fight | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 11:33 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedTechnically it’s not the same, because it is physically different. You can’t penetrate something, without the other thing existing. Therefore, both rely on each other, and in principle, makes it the same thing to me. This example just sprung to mind and it's different in many ways but just hit me. But a fight is technically not the same, because it's physically different. You can't beat someone without someone existing. Therefore, both rely on each other, and in principle, makes it the same thin… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 11:16 AM |
| -1 | CMV: Sex is sex but Penetrating someone is not the same as being penetratedI do concur that anal and vaginal penetration also aren't the same thing but do think that they have more similarities than do Putting a dick in a vagina and receiving a dick. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 10:19 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Since women are attracted to “bad boys” during their 20s and then settle down with the “nice guy” by the time they reach 30, that just means that pursuing healthy relationships with women is pointless.I'm not reading that wall of text. Use paragraphs. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/21 08:43 AM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Lol okay then | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 10:30 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Do you actually have any proof of this? I dont see how evolution has any basis in the low n count preference. It was in response to this assertion | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 03:00 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?As a side dish yeah | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 11:56 AM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Lmao okay unbiased observer | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 11:53 AM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Those links don't have to do with monogamy | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 11:34 AM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Anecdotal evidence is quite heavily biased by its very nature you know | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 11:30 AM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?No | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 10:06 AM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Monogamy has existed for 12,000 years, since we invented agriculture. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_jealousy#Male https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Buss https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_son_hypothesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Selfish_Gene https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Queen:_Sex_and_the_Evolution_of_Human_Nature I've linked the various wikipedia pages for the books and studies I've read that all say that sex, surprise surprise, is shaped by evolution. (Of course it is… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 08:20 AM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?You can't. There isn't a single emotion on earth that can ensure absolute certainty of the future | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/21 08:06 AM |
| 2 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?And because this kind of dogmatic garbage pretends everyone is the same. And that is a major part of why it's so incorrect and ignorant. You have a problem with the fact that no one includes polyamory when saying that women that have had lots of previous partners won't be satisfied with one man forever??? Are you delusional? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 10:56 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Slut shaming is because women are disrespected when they sleep with multiple guys.. it’s that simple. That's how it happens yes. Why though, evolutionary psychology. Since I’m older but still in good shape.. I have no need for the same things a younger woman with small children might have, I look for different types of qualities that younger women might not want. I don’t think it’s so black and white.. that all woman want one particular thing. I had younger guys want me that I rejected bc they d… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 10:26 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?I've just seen that you're 16 and thus I assume that you just don't yet know anything about evolutionary biology so I'll give you a pass. But look into the sexy son hypothesis and Evolutionary Stable Strategies for a primer on how evolution shapes sexual strategies in humans. I was about your age when I first started looking into this stuff deeply. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 08:43 PM |
| 0 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Yes. As you get older the subset of younger women interested in dating you is increasingly small. But (a) a lot of them will secretly fuck you and tbh that's great and (b) the ones that prefer older men, will fucking love you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 08:28 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Also, I am not sure evolution can think this far ahead. What the fuck are you talking about | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 08:18 PM |
| 3 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?You don't understand evolutionary psychology https://areomagazine.com/2019/08/20/seven-key-misconceptions-about-evolutionary-psychology/ Read this article. The basis for disgust for women who have higher n counts is something that can be more easily triggered in men due to evolution, but is likely to shift based on other factors. You should definitely read the entire article but points 1 and 4 are particularly relevant to your misconceptions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 08:10 PM |
| 6 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?and I would never cheat Truly believed by every cheater ever before they cheated. And if women with my partner counselor a higher cheating risk, does that mean men with my partner count are also a bigger cheating risk? Yes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 07:46 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Are you not? Learn something new everyday | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 06:38 PM |
| 11 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Then why the hell would your relationship and sexual history have any bearing on a discussion about sexual promiscuity and sexual exclusivity? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 06:36 PM |
| 3 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?u/SaBahRub what are you talking about | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:57 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Are the men seeing other people as well? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:56 PM |
| 2 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?I understand where the double standard comes from I just see it more as men’s problem than* women’s. That's fair | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:53 PM |
| -1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Not where I'm from | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:51 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?I have three long term committed relationships. ??? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:49 PM |
| 3 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Do they? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:49 PM |
| 3 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Have you ever had a guy tell you how much money he makes, and how he's so awesome because of it. Did that experience endear him to you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:48 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Why | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:47 PM |
| 1 | Do you think high n count women shouldn't be shamed and looked down on by men, and if so, why?Like my thread's still active | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:40 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Then onto the next one | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:38 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Could you define insecurity | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:31 PM |
| 2 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?That isn't true. We have heterosexual sex for biological reasons, but there are plenty of us that reject that. Evolutionarily the most common phobias are snakes (ophidiophobia) and spiders (arachnophobia) because we evolved a predisposition towards avoiding them. But not eveyrone on earth is afraid of these things. There is severe human variability on every single feature expressed by DNA. The low count preference yes can be heavily influenced by environmental factors but its basis is evolutiona… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:30 PM |
| 2 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?I have a high n count it's something they desperately want to be true 👀 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:19 PM |
| 2 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Why do women like famous people? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 05:04 PM |
| -3 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Nope. I'm an appreciating asset | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:59 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?19 year olds are a renewable resource | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:46 PM |
| 0 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?I honestly think that it's not in women's best interests to date high n count men, but it is to bang them. So basically Alpha Fux Beta Bucs. I don't like it, but I do think removing my own bias it is in their best interest. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:43 PM |
| 0 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?So can I assume that your definition of sexism closely adheres to any negative views arising due to a persons sex? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:41 PM |
| 2 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Having experience with women and showing it through energy is attractive, telling people how experienced you are is not attractive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:39 PM |
| 4 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?I don't think it's morally wrong, just as I doubt women think men shorter than them are evil. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:37 PM |
| 0 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Eh, a lot of 19 year olds have one or less partners. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:36 PM |
| 6 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Horrible idea, you don't argue with women you want to sleep with. Just withdraw your attention. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:35 PM |
| 6 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?The sexy son hypothesis posits the former rather than the latter when it comes to attraction. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:21 PM |
| 1 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Okay according to your definition is it sexist for a bisexual woman to not want to date men shorter than them but have no such qualms with women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:16 PM |
| 8 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Honestly any number higher than 1 is too high for a long term romantic partner for me | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 04:14 PM |
| 3 | If high n count women weren't shamed but also generally weren't taken seriously as long term partners would you still find that unfair?Can I ask you what's your definition of sexist? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/21 03:35 PM |
| -2 | Men who care about their partners having lower n counts, does sexual assault factor into your thinking?For me it might possibly be even more of an issue, as they're likely to hold issues about their past that will inevitably adversely affect me as well. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/21 11:08 AM |
| 4 | What's your shallowest turnoff ?This one is terrible and I expect (and probably deserve) to be downvoted for this one but a girl that's been severely sexually assaulted, so not just had a guy grab her ass in a club, but rape or something slightly less severe. Unfortunately for these women they develop certain mechanisms to defend themselves that will detriment me if I were to engage with them in a relationship. So that. Also any girl that lost her virginity before 17 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/21 12:41 AM |
| -1 | What would you do in the following hypothetical sci fi scenario?They can but would the guy agree to that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/10/21 04:39 PM |
| 1 | What would you do in the following hypothetical sci fi scenario?it's only available to engaged couples | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/10/21 04:19 PM |
| -1 | What would you do in the following hypothetical sci fi scenario?it's only available to engaged couples | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/10/21 04:18 PM |
| 1 | I don't think dating AI or sex robots can change the dating market as we know it today and will not help lonely sexless men.I want OP to think about 2 things. Video games, and Super Heroes. Watch any 80s movie these things were lame, terrible, etc, "Yeah. You are cringing now, aren't you. And that's the point." is exactly what the "jocks(chads)" and "cheerleaders(Staceys)" and "normal people( normies)" thought about guys who played video games and liked Super heroes. In the 2010s the revenue related to those things is almost x100 sports revenue. The reason? technology. There were popular superhero movies for a while … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/21 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Chris Chan is proof that fathers don't save their sons from being kissless virgin weirdos.Who's they? Point out one person in the comments that suggested this | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/10/21 02:40 PM |
| 1 | Chris Chan is proof that fathers don't save their sons from being kissless virgin weirdos.So I've seen your replies and you don't seem to be interested in a perspective that disagrees with your own. Like you're arguing with some imaginary guy who said correlation is causation and pinning this spectre of your imagination onto all of us who disagree with you. It isn't hyperbole to say your comments in this post might be the greatest example of strawmanning I can think of. No one's saying "causation = correlation" and it doesn't even seem to have anything to do with the post but you kee… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/10/21 11:20 AM |
| 1 | Chris Chan is proof that fathers don't save their sons from being kissless virgin weirdos.u/LillthOfBabylon do you really think this 1 piece of anecdotal evidence. 1. Demonstrates anything except your own strange biases | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/10/21 06:48 AM |
| 1 | Why do men take such interest in avoiding child support, but so little interest in avoiding pregnancy?This is a slightly interesting statement. I've seen it proposed that the right of abortion doesn't entail termination of the child, but that it's just a consequence of today's abortion. That if a fetus transfer into a surrogate or an artifical womb becomes possible then that will result in the mother paying child support in case she opts to abort, but the father doesn't. Any time I've seen that idea aired I've seen women suggest this is somehow wrong and that in that case it wouldn't be right th… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/09/21 12:33 PM |
| 1 | What do you mean when you say men who consume porn but wont wife pornstars are hypocrites?Sorry could you expand on the viewing of the focus part? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/08/21 05:03 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter