TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StrangeDimension2 Archive

View 0 posts and 91 comments by StrangeDimension2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I hope you never get chosen for a jury, man. Considering i live in a civilised country where our justice system isn't dependent on emotion, I won't. But I appreciate your concern
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/26 11:18 AM
1

Yeah that's what i thought
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 06:23 PM
1

Is it really obtuse We can also call it uneducated. I dont mind. Because I've been very clearly about what i mean. Also, I’m talking about the hypocrisy of “not all women.” What hypocrisy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 05:40 PM
1

EVERYONE has technically So you're being obtuse right now. And what's worse: US-centric don’t try to pretend you don’t know what I mean in the last sentence. I have no idea. I'm sure in your head it made a lot of sense though
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 05:04 PM
1

Dude... the growing divide between men and women in terms of political affiliation has been talked about for years now. Try to keep up Funny how saying “not all women” is perfectly fine for some people. I feel like you're trying to make a point
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 04:59 PM
1

I said there's a shift. As in change. As in the behaviour of one subset of women isn't the behaviour of all women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 04:53 PM
1

Are you able to read?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 04:48 PM
1

Still not a source
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 02:59 PM
-2

That's not a source. That's a sound
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 02:53 PM
1

This person literally made a connection between misandry and the metoo movement which invalidates the experiences and bravery of the people who came forward and still come forward to this day. This is why we made this subreddit You made this subreddit to have place where you can roleplay as the victim
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 02:10 PM
1

It's not nitpicking to be against the way someone frames their claim
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 01:45 PM
1

It's intentionally vague which i dont like but generally true
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 01:38 PM
1

minimize the existence of female perpetrators which they certainly did The claim wasnt "minimize" the claim was "dont recognise" there's a difference
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 01:17 PM
1

If that makes you feel better about yourself
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 12:38 PM
1

Didnt realise human beings are dictionaries who can always at the drop of a hat reproduce definitions perfectly (and in a non-native language too). The meaning was still clear. When you don't have anything factual to say, you have to resort to being pedantic. That's just sad
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 12:31 PM
1

Yeah because "oneself" and "one's own group" is such a fundamental difference 🙄
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 12:24 PM
1

If you support someone's claim, it's also your claim The claim was that women's groups deny the existence of male victims and female perpetrators. The sources you gave very clearly point out that the groups in questions had other concerns. You may not share those concerns (i certainly don't) but please dont lie
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 12:24 PM
1

internalized (not comparable) Of discriminatory views: held against one's own group, as a result of internalizing them https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/internalized Try again babycakes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 12:20 PM
1

You don't even know what internalized misandry means. You're below the knowledge level required to speak to me. Misandry =dislike, hatred, prejudice regarding men. Internalised= Focused on oneself Your arrogance is really undeserving
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 08:36 AM
1

Then you should know that they don't support your claim
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 06:18 AM
1

Have you read thise articles?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 05:53 AM
1

I haven't needed my own sources every time. Of course you dont need sources when most things you say are bs The ability to laugh at yourself is a good character trait It absolutely is. But in this case i was laughing at the very predictable and very pathetic move to tell me i must hate myself because i dont believe your self-victimisation. Especially since the opposite is true and i am incredibly happy about being a man
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 05:35 AM
1

taken as a feminist win, Which is also a win for feminists my take is still i dont owe anything to women in the same way they dont owe me anyhting No your take is that men should reflect their own behaviours and change for the better. Which is just sad a movement that endangers me Literally no man is in active danger because of feminism. And the fact that you are so threatened by it makes me think you've got skeletons to hide
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 05:32 AM
1

I've replied every time. You just don't care. You haven't replied with sources though I get it, your internalized misandry blinds you. I was waiting for that. Thanks for the laugh but we have nothing to do with other groups that feminists like to tar us with, like "incel" groups or pick-up artist groups. So you can confidently say there's zero overlap?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 10:07 PM
1

Yeah all you had to do was ask Funny. I have been asking you multiple times to back your claims up. Most of the time you ignored it Ah, so people who care about real issues affecting men Like I said: people who care more about patting themselves on the back than the people they claim to advocate for I'm in other groups that aren't necessarily related to this. So when people who are active in this group are also active in classic manosphere groups thats unrelated?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 09:58 PM
1

Lack of resource ‘equality’ means research of the deadliest cancers is often underfunded https://share.google/5jkISUCWmmOVVAPFl There you go. Wasnt hard, was it? Now we need you to work on actually reading and understanding the things you use as sources. You don't even know who people like me are. Let me specify what i mean by that: People who are active in this subreddit because they believe the crap thats said here Feminists lump together like twelve different kinds of people into the "manosph…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 09:48 PM
1

It's a characterization of what feminists absolutely engage in to distract from the very real issue of suicide It's a lie Do you agree that prostate cancer should be funded to similar levels as breast and ovarian cancer? I thought testicular cancer research is underfunded? (For which you still haven't provided a source btw) pick a narrative please There isn't much difference between all you feminists when you parrot basically the same hateful fountain of lies. Funny. I could say the same thing a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 09:30 PM
1

Something I haven't done Claiming that feminists (and I) look at suicide attempts to frame male suicides as "not that bad" isnt putting words in someone's mouth? Give me a source on yours first. Funny how i have backed up most of what i said with sources while you simply talk out of your ass. But here you go: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44294-024-00048-6 See, there you go lying again. Just following your example that even feminists acknowledge is true. See this is the problem with people li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 09:17 PM
1

what does that tell you? It tells me that you dont think things through Arguing in good faith doesn't preclude pointing out lies. It requires it. Putting words in someone's mouth however is a part of arguing in bad faith. Like testicular cancer, which gets half the funding per death from it as ovarian and breast cancers. Source? Male expendability is a common concept in egalitarian circles. Educate yourself, to use a phrase feminists love. To use your own words: That "theory" is not based in rea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 08:58 PM
1

it was all about the sexual abuse of women, That's funny because i distinctly remember multiple predators that were "cancelled" for abusing boys/men. expect average or below average men (and sometimes boys or teens) to cater to their fears and validate them or expect men to be fine with being treated like rabid dogs or potential predators, the hate towards men happened because lots of women wanted all the men to take responsability for the actions of some men who had nothing to to with them Care…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 08:40 PM
1

People that are stressed and overworked are more likely to engage in these activities and thus die earlier. Funny how even you say people and not men. feminist lie of women attempting suicide more to pretend as though men actually completing suicide isn't so bad You really can't argue in good faith can you? Diseases specific to women get more funding for research You mean like endometriosis for which research has been underfunded for decades? Men are just used as guinea pigs for testing because …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 08:37 PM
1

Part Two When we look at mental health, we unfortunately see that 73% of suicides are committed by men. Paradoxically, women are far more likely to attempt suicides which according to experts is a result of the strategies used in a suicide attempt. Because of that large difference, there are multiple suicide prevention programs and research coorperations that specifically address men, like Männer-stärken (which translates to empowering men). If you look at preventative health care, you'll see th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 08:05 PM
1

Part One You used a study done in Germany as your "source" so let's look at life expectancy in Germany. I'm German, so I have most of the relevant data ready anyway. General Stats: As of the 31st of December 2024, Germany has a population of about 83.5 million people. Women have a slight majority (50,6% vs. 49.4%) As is often the case, women have a higher life expectancy than men with 78,2 years vs. 83,0 years. In 2023 (which is the earliest official data I could find), the top 5 causes of death…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 08:05 PM
1

I'd feel sorry for you for being wrong but i get the feeling that's a common thing for you
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 08:04 PM
1

Which is factually incorrect
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 06:08 PM
1

Yeah that's what I thought
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 06:05 PM
1

Okay I'll bite: How did metoo lead to "misandry" online?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 06:02 PM
1

Source?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 02:52 PM
1

No offense but I'm not gonna discuss the merits of psychotherapy with you when that's not the topic at hand
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 02:37 PM
1

Considering the amount of therapy I have needed so far, I'm pretty sure
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 02:20 PM
1

I based my "conclusion" on my observation that no one in this subreddit posseses an ounce of self-reflection
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 02:13 PM
1

At least I am not using slurs and insults to cover for a lack of arguments
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 10:20 AM
1

Spoken like a true mra
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 10:09 AM
1

I'm gonna pretend you asked nicely, so sure. You got it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 06:07 AM
1

Your unearned arrogance is exactly why I don't jump at the opportunity to write a long comment about it. Do you really think your demeanor screams "open to change my mind"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 06:02 AM
1

Why would this gap be present, killing men 5 years early, if not for misandry at a societal level? I could tell you but i don't fancy wasting time on someone who's not interested in challenging their own views
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:58 AM
1

Which your source also doesn't back up
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:51 AM
1

Men are pushed to ignore their health more and work more physically demanding jobs, which results in earlier death. This was your claim. Which isnt supported by that study
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:48 AM
1

It's one study with questionable methodology that doesn't prove your claim
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:46 AM
1

Source?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:45 AM
-2

You don't know what conjecture means, do you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:43 AM
-2

This is exactly why I cannot take people like you seriously. Victims of sexual abuse openly talk about their experiences and you frame it as "misandry"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:42 AM
2

How convenient
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 05:39 AM
1

That's it? I'm disappointed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 11:01 PM
1

Well I was hoping for a quote directly from Dworkin and not from a Wikipedia article. But what was i expecting Okay, pick anything on the list The "life gap". Which i assume is referring to differences in life expectancy? I'm incredibly curious how you want to break down such a complex topic into "women bad, men victims"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 10:51 PM
1

Yeah, the same who remains cited in feminist works to this day Then please provide me with the source of her statement that a penis is defiling Defend the fact that men and boys get longer prison sentences for the same crime than women do. What reason is there for that? There you go cherrypicking again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 10:43 PM
2

Are you familiar with Popper's Paradox of tolerance?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 10:36 PM
1

The us still shows a widening gap between men and women. Obviously it's younger generations driving that. I dont think men should be less susceptible than women. I think men should be less susceptible than they are now. Which means we need to understand the reasons behind it. And "feminism bad" or "wokeism bad" is a harmful oversimplification
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 10:25 PM
1

Andrea Dworkin? As in the Andrea Dworkin that has been 1) dead for like 20 years and 2) whose main works were dealing with criticisms towards pornography? That Andrea Dworkin? No what's dogmatic is taking every difference between men and women without understanding why that difference exists and twisting it to fit your own narrative
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 10:22 PM
1

I'm all for body positivity (even though most of the other things you said is just bs) but considering there is absolutely no evidence that a penis is seen by a relevant portion of the society as defiling this has nothing to do with body positivity. It's just the same old, tired narrative again. Which is why people don't take you so called "male advocates" serious
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 10:13 PM
1

Considering I've criticised that vile things are being said here, one might infer that I am referring to a post that minimised sexual violence
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 10:11 PM
1

Saying that a penis is seen as defiling is advocacy now?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 10:05 PM
1

So minimising sexual violence is an acceptable topic to talk about now?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 09:55 PM
1

Some things need to be shunned
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 09:54 PM
1

Is playing the victim all you're good for?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 09:49 PM
1

Because you don't sound dogmatic at all... Anyway, I don't want to disturb your self-victimisation any longer so... you know... have a nice life
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 09:20 PM
1

So you've spoken to many feminists and all of them were the problem but you as the common denominator aren't? At least you're confident...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 09:12 PM
1

Tell me you've never spoken to a feminist irl without telling me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:52 PM
1

If you had an actual reason to disagree I'd be happy to hear it. But your misinformation is hardly a legitimate reason. But people like you can't see their own hypocrisy anyway
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:47 PM
1

Ah I see. You don't understand it. So it's scary
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:43 PM
-1

If you would like to close your eyes and disagree with the fact that most societies are patriarchal, be my guest. But please, for the love of god, research what a conspiracy theory actually is
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:40 PM
-1

You seem to be very focused on scientific rigour. So it's baffling that you feel the need to criticise what you call the "patriarchy theory" and yet you seem to have no problem with the fact that the original post has little to no factual basis
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:37 PM
1

Showcasing your cluelessness to the world like this? I'd be embarrassed if I were you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:32 PM
0

Interesting priorities
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:26 PM
-2

Considering how many absolutely vile things are said in this sub? No I'm not here in good faith right now. Because there's a difference between exchanging opposite ideas and living in a fantasy world
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:15 PM
2

you’re missing the nature of propaganda Says the guy who seems to be active in this subredit. I mean I love a bit of irony but this is too much where’s here for you? Not sure how that's relevant but I'm german
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:05 PM
2

I guessed right then. Here's the thing though: I'm not from the us so your propaganda doesn't affect me very much
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:02 PM
1

And where exactly is "over here"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 07:58 PM
-2

Then you should know that French society is still clinging to colonial times which means it's wildly racist. Which would explain the fact that France is an outlier in terms of political affiliation in men vs. women. Do you really need everything spelled out for you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 07:53 PM
1

So no. Thanks for playing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 07:43 PM
1

You don't know many French people do you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 07:38 PM
-1

France is one country. A lot of other countries like the US, the UK and Germany show a clear discrepancy in the political affiliation of the sexes. Which means that in those countries the right is obviously less successful in targeting women. Which brings us to the question: Why? (Spoiler: It's not because of wokeism or feminism or women)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 07:22 PM
-7

So you think the right doesn't try to target women as well?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 06:40 PM
-21

The keywords being "men AND women". But since we see no shift to the right in women it cant only be about struggling
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 06:38 PM
-27

more and more men are pushed to the right As if men are poor, defenseless impressionable creatures who cannot think for themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 05:37 PM
-33

I just love how men apparently arent accountable for their actions anymore
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 04:52 PM
-8

I love how you people tell on each other with every post you make
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 06:47 PM
-5

It would be very convenient for your narrative if that were true. But the crew alone (which nowadays isnt quite as male-dominated anymore) doesnt result in such a lopsided survival statistic
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 06:00 PM
-5

It's only misandrist when you people don't do your research. Research shows that (in the past 150ish years) men have had an advantage when it came to surving disaster, despite the "women and children first" myth. Not to mention that nowadays it isnt even really applied The children part more obviously and clearly refers to girls There is absolutely no evidence for that. And the fact that you use such a claim clearly shows your intentions with this post
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 05:07 PM
1

I'm sorry but saying that the "toxic masculinity theory" is falsified and harmful based on a non-scientific article is just ridiculous. Nothing in this article proves those claims
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 09:55 AM
1

"Female privilege"? You must be joking
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/25 05:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter