TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StrangeReference7003 Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by StrangeReference7003 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I mean, if a line cook with aspirations to become a chef, or a carpenter is some sort of high social status, then sure, in dating I was looking for somebody with a high social status. When you're a woman making a six figure salary, if a guy shows no realistic ambitions, people talk behind your back a lot, and it reflects poorly on your character. When a man is with a gold digging woman, people say, well at least he seems to be happy. When a woman is with a gold digging man, people say, wow, she'…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:20 AM
1

Not necessarily status, for example I was previously in a professional networking environment that was largely dominated by very wealthy individuals. In those circles and with the status I had acheived myself, things would have been awkward if my partners career didn't exhibit some sort of developed skill or ambition. Folks in blue collar fields and trades were respected in the circles, and that is want an issue. Wasn't a problem for my partner who is a woodworker, folks in skilled trades could …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 09:03 PM
18

I forget who said it, but the best analogy I've heard a relationship coach explain, is that people want a partner that can "scuba dive" in their world. They don't have to fully integrated into their professional life by any means, but they want to be able to bring their partner to work Christmas parties and not be awkward
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 05:33 PM
4

I'll start with passport bros as I have some personal experience that touches on it; as somebody who immigrated to a different country to start a life with their partner, the partner sponsoring said move has a n enormous burden of responsibility of aiding the partner in their integration. The sponsoring partner basically becomes an educator on the language, culture, job market, customs, laws, everything. There is also a large burden of responsibility on those who are moving to take an active rol…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 04:36 AM
4

Not all passport bros, porn, OF, age gaps, sex work, and robots are ethical. They all can be ethical, but aren't necessarily ethical by nature. That's where the problem lies
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 05:55 PM
1

Show me where in the data it shows that the top 20% of men are getting the vast majority of attention from women in terms of messages. Yes, more attractive men receive more than their fair share of messages, welcome to the real world where people have the ability to choose their partners. But the bottom 27% of men are still receiving something like 12% of the messages. The bottom 60% of men are still getting at least 35% of the messages. The bottom 80% which fall in the "below average attractive…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 09:42 AM
1

That's not what the data says, for god's sake stop making assumptions and actually look at it. it shows that those ranked at 4 on a 0-5 scale receive 5% of messaging, less than half of those ranked 0, who get over 10%.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 08:54 AM
0

In the study, the men that received the most messages from women were those rated as a 2 on a scale of 0-5 https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/#:~:text=Women%2C%20on%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20are%20harsh,men%20on%20the%20site%20as%20%27below%20average%27.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 06:30 AM
3

Lol, the study actually shows that most women soecifically avoid messaging the top 5 percent of most attractive men on dating apps, and that it was men they rated a 2 on a scale of 0-5 that they were most likely to message https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/#:~:text=Women%2C%20on%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20are%20harsh,men%20on%20the%20site%20as%20%27below%20average%27.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 06:28 AM
-1

People forget what the actual study said, and it gets misconstrued. Yes, it showed that women perceived 80% of men to be of below average attractiveness, but the study also showed that women tended to not message the guys that they viewed as above average, and were more likely to message me who they viewed as being below average attractiveness.https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/#:~:text=Women%2C%20on%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20are%20harsh,men%20on%20the%20site%20as%20%27be…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 06:24 AM
2

A strong majority of people with 9 plus partners remain faithful in monogamous relationships, it's just an even stronger majority among people with fewer partners. You're acting like somebody with a more extensive sexual history is more likely than not to cheat on their partner, which is not even what the statistics show.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:17 PM
2

Studies on prairie voles don't count when analyzing human behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 01:51 PM
22

The kids coming out of those programs are doing quite well compared to their peers in similar circumstances. So yeah, they do work.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 11:33 AM
4

Then why are there several organizations like this specifically for boys in my community? There are tons of them out there, and the are celebrated, not treated as though they are taking things away from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 11:15 AM
0

There are lots of them out there. Bit if you want to start another one go right ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 11:14 AM
1

It depends on generation, a strong majority of boomer women for sure, a weak majority of gen X, then millenials and gen z it slips below majority levels but still a chunk. Similar pattern with men as well, generationally. Boomers and hen X being strong majority, millenials being weak majority, and gen z slipping below that line.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:00 PM
1

A lot of women are definitely misandrists. Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 02:26 PM
1

It's not about disliking. It's fine to have a dislike. I'm specifically speaking of that dislike going so far as to induce suffering on oneself in order to not use an object for a temporary period of time because of its association with femininity. The example for clarity, it's pouring rain out, the individual has to walk through the pouring rain, let's say for 20 minutes either completely unprotected by a coat or umbrella that is pink. Or let's say it's a blizzard, and instead of a pink umbrell…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:02 AM
1

For a cis man, the femmephobia isn't a matter of just an alternate state of being, it's an inferior state of being, which is rooted in misogyny, not the gender dysphoria experienced by trans individuals. If you have a more limited definition that you personally use for misogyny, that's fine. But I am speaking to strictly the holistic academic definition of misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:51 AM
1

Most men who participate in the concept of fragile masculinity are cis, not trans.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 06:24 AM
2

For sakenof discussion, since you don't seem to like it, let's make it a pink coat instead of being without a coat in the freezing cold. The fear of loosing masculinity is in itself misogynistic, in the sense that its treating femininity, which is the lack of masculinity as an inferior state of being. Especially when a man is willing to impose suffering on themselves in order to maintain that masculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 10:19 PM
3

The need for that level.of gender affirmation, that something that is typically attributed as a feminine act as being something u acceptable for men to perform is rooted in femmephobia which is a form of misogyn
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:07 PM
15

If we are talking the holistic academic definition of misogyny, I would say that yes, a majority of men in the US exhibit misogynistic behaviors to some extent. For example, it's common for men to trust a female auto mechanic less than a male auto mechanic without actually evaluating their skills just before they are a woman. They're are a lot of men who would rather walk in the rain without any protection than use a pink umbrella because "pink is a woman's color." Lots of men want their spouse …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 07:58 PM
1

Being a good partner and being a suitable partner are what makes you more physically attractive to a woman. The nature of a woman's physical attraction is insanely fluid, and is not something in a solid state. The more suitable of a partner you appear to be emotionally and personality wise, the physical attraction grows. Like her view of how physically attractive are will actually change in her perception.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter