TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StrawRedditor Archive

View 1 post and 231 comments by StrawRedditor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They actually had/have a point, they really were marginalised and discriminated against, That's not what he disagreed on.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:07 PM
11

Naw, just give them the same sentence they would have given someone if they had kidnapped and locked someone in their basement for X amount of time... + 10% for the libel that comes with it with a rape accusation.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 02:58 AM
451

she lied to cover the fact she was looking at porn and it snow balled into ruining this poor mans life. That alone should qualify her for entrance into a mental institution of some sort. Seriously, how fucked up can you be?
/r/MensRights15/05/17 02:55 AM
1

Some would dare call that... female privilege?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 08:31 PM
20

pretty much everybody on earth agree that the cops in the US really act like they can use black folks as target practice. Then they're wrong. A cop is more likely to be killed by a black person than a black person be killed by a cop. Let that sink in and then ask if it's actually due to discrimination.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:39 AM
13

Exactly. It'd be one thing if they said something along the lines of: "That's cool, but I still prefer to identify as feminist/blm for these reasons". But when they actually get mad at you and call you sexist/racist/whatever, that's when you really see their true colors.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:38 AM
1

Your logic doesn't follow at all. Are you implying that the worse the crime you accuse someone of, the lesser the punishment should be for a false accusation? We're not talking accidents here... we're talking about malicious false accusations done with forethought.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:32 PM
3

No. It should be worse. The outcome of her actions would have resulted in jail time and otherwise ruining that guys life. What do you think the punishment would be if I got caught trying to kidnap someone and lock them in my basement for a few years after slandering their name?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:52 PM
6

That's retarded. Giving your name to the police is not a deterrent. It's about accountability
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:49 PM
4

I think what I find most horrifying is that she doesn't realize that the only reason she's even allowed to behave the way she currently is, is because of her privilege.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:29 PM
5

She dicked him either way. All this shows is that she did it just for the sake of dicking him rather than her own benefit.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/16 04:14 PM
3

Here's the thing though: "falsifying police records and defamation of character" had the chance to send that guy to prison for 10+ years. Would you rather be raped or sent to prison for 10+ years? What's the punishment for attempted rape? What's the punishment for an "attempted" (unsuccessful) false rape accusation?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:03 PM
1

you don't seem to agree at all with the definitions of rape that I give (in which intent is not a key factor), That's my point though. You don't get to redefine words. Rape is a strictly defined crime in which mens rea is a requirement.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 08:05 AM
1

But should it be even when it's accidental? I think you completely missed the point. The point is that if it's accidental, it's not rape. There is no such thing as accidental rape. but my point was that they both have two versions with similar results but very different intent. Then have two versions. The one with bad intent is "rape", the accidental one is NOT "rape". Similarly, with rape (according to my definition, anyway) the person is raped either way, but the intent is different Well no. S…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 10:19 PM
1

Now, whether or not the accidental rapist should be considered a criminal is another story. Nothing against you, but I really hate this line of thinking. Rape is a crime. In order for someone to be a criminal guilty of the crime of rape, you need mens rea. You really cannot have an accidental rapist, meaning you cannot have a rapist who is not a criminal. In saying that, it's possible to have someone who feels like they've been a victim of rape, but that does not make what happened a crime, whic…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 08:16 PM
1

but I'd argue that if a partner (male or female) is being extremely unresponsive, it's best to ask and make sure that nothing's wrong even if they already undressed To be polite/courteous? Sure. But surely you aren't suggesting that such thing be the deciding factor between a crime like rape, and just normal consensual sex. Seriously, if "accidental rape" is a thing, then the prescribed punishments for it in our legal system are completely out of whack.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 06:52 PM
1

She said she didn't say no though (well actually, she was very contradicting... but my post was on the assumption that " there was also no shouting, "no!" In fact, there was nothing but immobilization." actually means what it says). You're right though, if she had udnressed and then said no, she's perfectly in her right to do that. But if you undress and then fail to say anything otherwise... why would someone think that meant anything but implicit consent?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 05:41 PM
0

But that goes both ways. She claims "immobilization", but I highly doubt it. There's no way she didn't participate at all... whether by undressing herself, undressing him, changing positions, oral, whatever.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:50 PM
3

I don't think you need to be inexperienced to have that happen. There's a reason the term "starfish in bed" exists.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:49 PM
21

Basically, I think the author is fucking delusional. She says that she was "immobilized", but you'd have to be pretty dumb I think to believe that an entire sexual encounter happened without her participation. She didn't take off her pants? Her shirt? She didn't take off his pants? She didn't give oral? She didn't go with him to the bedroom? I mean, I guess if she was literally 100% actionless the entire time, you could argue that immobilization and an absence of "yes" would make it rape... but …
/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:45 PM
27

Because she is a mother.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 04:24 PM
4

However, each cabinet member he appointed is qualified for their position. Debatable but... the question isn't whether they are qualified, it's whether they were the best qualified.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 01:59 PM
3

There are millions of refugees and we're only taking in 10,000 by the end of the year (month now I guess), Then that means you can take just families and discriminate against single people in general and still be able to easily meet that quota. The reason women, families, and non-straight men have been given priority is because these groups pose the least security risk while simultaneously being the most at risk of violence committed by Daesh that's not true.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 01:58 PM
45

But it's only harassment when it's in response to them shutting down the mens day. All that "healthy protest" that caused them to shut it down in the first place is just fine!
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:53 PM
5

Yes, that is the exactly literal meaning... but I'm fairly sure she didn't mean to call herself dumb.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:31 PM
16

Fairly sure she was talking about the ones that complain about it.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:20 PM
27

What kind of fucked up logic is that for ANY crime? Just because you don't see the "inappropriateness" if a crime means it's suddenly not a crime? What the fuck?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:47 PM
9

Further proof that most SJW's like this are just narcissists.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 10:31 PM
14

What's hilarious I think is that most of us were just joking about these contracts as we all thought they were the most ridiculous things and it would never actually happen... fuck
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:42 PM
2

Sexism is discrimination based on sex.... by people. I'd argue that nature can't be sexist, because "nature" isn't a conscious being.. it's just a word to describe what is.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:58 PM
21

We're talking 11 years old here.... I'd agree with that argument if the kids are like 15/16... but we're talking about the age where kids still think the other sex has cooties.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:50 PM
7

Yeah, that's what stuck out to me too... granted, maybe this specific judge is being consistent with themselves, but it's definitely not consistent with how most judges would have sentenced an older man who fucked six 11 year old girls.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:49 PM
3

You're kind of ignoring parts of that story, or at least I'm remembering something very similar that made that judges decision actually reasonable. IIRC, an underage girl went to a club that required 18+ with a fake ID. A guy had sex with her assuming she was 18+ since she got in the club, and because she had matured early, the judge concluded that there was really no reason for the guy to think she was as young as she was.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:58 PM
6

Pretty fucked up isn't it? They define: "Being a pig" in such a way that it's incredibly broad, and then use that to blanket all men as pigs. And then when I test my "hypothesis" I find out that even by my fucked definition, that most don't even apply. Really goes to show how fucking warped their narrative is.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:20 PM
23

hat I believe is happening is there is a redefining of what rape i Oh for sure, and that's exactly what feminists want. They know that using the "r word" is a weapon, so they want it as common as possible.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:09 PM
21

I really think false accusations of any kind (ESPECIALLY when specific people are targeted and named) need much more severe punishment. I mean, if you actually think about that they are trying to do to someone. How many years in jail do you think I'd get for trying to kidnap someone with plans to hold them for years upon years. I then throw a bunch of bigger guys down there with them so they can beat up and/or rape the people I kidnapped. Oh and because I kidnapped them, they'll lose their job. …
/r/MensRights27/03/15 08:01 PM
6

I agree. In my mind, there's not a very big space between "pretending" to threaten to kill someone and actually killing them. If you're willing to do the first (and so convincingly that you actually have a loaded gun to their head, it's not like you're just saying the words: "I'm going to kill you")... I don't think said person is that far off from actually intending to kill someone in the future.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:09 PM
1

they got less than 2 minutes of footage...of people saying "hello", "have a good day" and "wow". Which I'm surprised they even published. I mean, it's scary that they made that video and actually thought that it was harassment.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:10 PM
14

Agreed. I hate that: "Meant to" shit based on anything. People can choose to do whatever they want (if they're capable).
/r/MensRights28/12/14 11:17 PM
5

I think it is pretty clearly that, but I still think this is one of those situations that you have to ask.. was there really a victim? (and I'm referring to the boy... know the grown fucking woman who is crying). Should she be fired and never allowed to teach again?? 100% yes without a question. Does she deserve jail time despite no one actually being harmed? Ehh... MY only hiccup with this line of thinking is that it'd be hard to judge the students response going into it, and right afterwards. …
/r/MensRights21/12/14 04:04 PM
0

I think they need to be taught to have even the tiniest amount of personal responsibility. Seriously, totally ignoring you know, the whole rape side of this... how the fuck warped does your mind have to be to think that you're the victim for influencing a fucking 15 year old.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 03:59 PM
1

I agree. As long as the movement still adopts thing like patriarchy theory, I think it's kind of inevitable that it trends to what the western countries are seeing it do. I mean yes, it's pretty obvious that places like Qatar operate under a patriarchy. That however, to say that the majority of men there are privileged would be a very incorrect statement. So, if Ayaan Hirsi Ali's "reclaimed feminism" still uses a definition of patriarchy that thinks these men would be privileged, then I think it…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 02:16 PM
30

Which is what makes situations like these all the more hilarious. Instead of doing anything to help the women who would be interested in something like this, they do their best to turn them away from it, further perpetuating the gender gap in that particular area.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:57 PM
4

Oh for sure.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:46 PM
2

Just to be argumentative though... It's important to note that criticism of Islam is not necessarily criticism of all Muslims either (at least not directly). Not saying that people only criticize Islam and never criticize all muslims for the actions of a few... but still.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:22 AM
1

Because they view it as something that they can actually influence (incorrectly I might add).
/r/MensRights02/11/14 07:24 PM
8

They ignore women being stoned to death for being raped in other parts of the world but throw a hissy fit when a man says 'sweety' to her. Actually, what I think I dislike most about this... is that they don't even ignore the women being stoned to death. They use the fact that women are being stoned to death in other parts of the world to legitimize their movement, and then use that legitimacy to complain about being called "sweety" or to "ban bossy". I think that's far worse. That being said, t…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:32 PM
35

So guilty until proven innocent... because even the most outlandish scenarios without even the tiniest shred of evidence should be taken as fact over actual video proof of something.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:19 PM
7

I THINK (and don't quote me on this), that this only applies to evidence obtained illegally by the state. Say you shoot someone, and then I break into your house and steal the gun that you used and anonymously leave it at the police station... I'm fairly certain that it would be admissible even though it was illegally obtained.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:18 PM
19

Well, worst case... a charge of illegally recording someone may be better than a rape charge (if it's admissable). Best case, it's challenged at a higher court and ruled as invalid because of the problem you presented.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:15 PM
15

How do people like this get to be professors... it's insane. "I certainly think it is a bad idea, legally as well as culturally, to incentivize surreptitious videotaping of any kind, let alone of sexual encounters." I mean, if you realize what's actually icentivizing (is that even a word?) these recordings then that statement is not that wrong... but his call to just make it illegal rather than to address the actual problem is just stupid. Also, isn't it already illegal to spread these tapes wit…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:14 PM
0

Her words taken completely alone are fine... but they aren't alone, as she is representing an organization. When you compare her words to those of the organization, her words are very hypocritical.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:00 PM
5

She is representing that organization... they are one in the same. It's not like she just went up there and freestyled her speech.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:20 PM
4

More words... doesn't change the fact that their action statement is to only help women.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:20 PM
6

If anything it just exposes how acceptable this gynocentric view of everything is. That someone as visible as her can go to a world stage and say: "Boys and girls face problems... let's only help girls", and the majority of people don't bat an eye.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:54 PM
8

Even if she was talking about places other than the west (and she really wasn't with some of the examples she was giving), do you not think men also have really shitty lives here too? Maybe the rich men do, but the poor men? Have you heard of the stadium being built in Qatar pretty much by slave labor? Have you heard how many of them died so far? Want to take a guess which gender 100% of those people are? You think that's just a coincidence? What about child soldiers? How many you think are girl…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:53 PM
2

This is heforshes pledge: "Gender equality is not only a women’s issue, it is a human rights issue that requires my participation. I commit to take action against all forms of violence and discrimination faced by women and girls." Tell me how the first sentence relates to the second. Tell me how anything about gender equality or men face issues is solved by only "taking action" against violence and discrimination face by ONLY women and girls? Would it be that fucking hard to say "all forms of vi…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:48 PM
5

. She actually acknowledged that men face problems of their own. However, she twisted things here and there and it was all for the promotion of a 'heforshe' campaign, which to me seems sexist per definition. A lot of feminists will acknowledge that men face problems... then they go on to say some "patriarchy hurts men too" shit, where "if we end patriarchy by only helping women, then men will get better too just magically"... aka... "ignore men". It's the exact same shit said by a prettier face …
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:45 PM
1

then the MRA movement is full of a lot of woman hating right now You're really living up to your username right now. Show me examples of all this woman hating right now if it's so prevalent.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:44 PM
6

and it is focused solely on women. Which is a problem if you're actually claiming to be helping everyone and you're saying you're about gender equality. while merely leaning towards a more women's focused view. What a load of shit. This is straight from the website: "The HeForShe Commitment Gender equality is not only a women’s issue, it is a human rights issue that requires my participation. I commit to take action against all forms of violence and discrimination faced by women and girls."
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:42 PM
18

What annoys me the most about that though, is that she/they legitimately believe it's for "gender equality". They talk about male problems too, talk about how they should be fixed, say everyone should be equal and then say: "Men need to help fix only womens problems".
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:40 PM
2

I've said this a few times about things feminists say. If you want something to be a certain way... that's fine, but you have to be consistent. If you really want to take the stance that people of the opposite gender can't really contribute to discussion... then fine, let's use that. IF that's the case though, start by telling all female (and/or) feminists to just completely remove the word "men" from their vocabulary. They are no longer allowed an opinion, they have no say in policy, they have …
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:00 PM
3

Yeah, it's pretty sad. Especially when it's coming from the group of people who claim to care the most.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:41 PM
9

Nah don't you see, that's just internalized misogyny. You don't actually think that, you're just being brainwashed by the patriarchy to hate yourself and your entire gender and not even realize it. Silly little girl. /s
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:50 PM
2

Lol, I always laugh at their "arguments"... which are really just statements. A sexualized man is a sexualized man... Okay sure. A sexualized woman is an object.... Oh, I guess because you say so.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:46 PM
2

I think you might be mistaken... here's a quote from the OP. . For the first 6 months we were together, she was actually also dating someone else,
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:23 PM
4

What are the chances of these events happening and someone deciding that the best thing to do is to post on /r/relationships[2] ? I don't find people going to reddit to ask for help is really that surprising. The guy just had an A-bomb dropped on him, and could very well be panicking. He's going to anywhere or anyone who would listen.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:02 PM
3

Even assuming that her feels for him did change... cheating on someone for 6 months is just an awful thing to do, and definitely the sign of someone who is a horrible person. So while it is possible that she may have grown to legitimately love him, having that fucked up of a moral compass is a lot more fundamental... that shit doesn't change easily, if at all.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:01 PM
3

Why without sound?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:49 PM
2

but it’s a reasonably fair description of a large, influential, highly visible segment of modern feminism. I feel like this is important to emphasize a little bit, because it really applies to pretty much any criticism of feminism... especially if you're talking to feminists about things. Let's take female on male rape. I don't really care if half of feminists think that women can rape men. I don't really care if 95% of feminists think that... shit I don't even care if all but one think that. At…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:45 PM
9

Agreed... It's really not that surprising that it happens though. When these people make feminism such a huge part of their identity (as what happens with many ideologies) they take any criticism of it, as a criticism of themselves (and in some cases it should be). On top of that, if your head is completely ingrained with the idea that "feminism = women's rights... if you're not a feminist you're a sexist/misogynist"... then it's not surprising to see people equating a criticism of feminism with…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:25 PM
3

It makes a lot of sense. All men are conscripted, therefore they have to do it anyway. If they choose to actually join the military after conscription, all of that stuff is already done so they don't have to pay. (I also find it funny that I'm talking like forcing someone to pay maybe $100 for an entrance physical would be wrong... in context of talking about forcing someone to essentially donate their body for X years). Since women are not forced to join, they don't get that free covered and as…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:01 PM
11

I was going to say the same thing. Gynocentrism anyone? "Oh, you were talking about it being mandatory for only men to join? Let's just forget about that... the real travesty is that women have to pay when they choose to join of their own free will".
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:59 PM
1

Critics of feminism are criticizing their collective actions. There's been posts like that on this subreddit before this post is one example. It could obviously do with a lot of updating... but still. If feminists are too stupid to realize what their own movement is doing, that doesn't exempt them from criticism.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:17 PM
20

As vindictive as it sounds... I almost feel like the only way to fight this insanity is to start promoting men to issue rape accusations with the same standards that feminism uses. Were you drunk? Then it's rape. Do you regret it the next day? It's rape. Did they ask more than once? Rape. Just like the draft, and just like alimony/child support laws... only when women actually start being negatively affected by this fucking stupidity, will we actually see these people realize their own idiocy.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:13 PM
9

Yeah, fuck him... let's just forget the only reason he has to do any of this is for something stupid he did at fucking 14 years old. Edit: age 12
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:27 AM
29

I mean shit, why prosecute murderers? God forbid we prevent any murderers from coming forward.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:43 PM
3

We would, just like most are defending this girl too... That doesn't change the double standard that'd exist in the MSM's reaction to it.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:04 PM
1

One of the justifications of LPS/Financial abortion is that it would bring a mans parental/reproductive rights closer in line with a womans. IF women don't have that right, then it doesn't really make sense for us to get it... and if we did, it certainly wouldn't be equality. Let's say men did get LPS but abortion was banned. You'd be effectively forcing pregnant women to give birth to a child without any support from the father against the mothers will. If abortion was legal, then it's the moth…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:33 PM
9

I disagree (to an extent). I think if "we" as a group support things like "financial abortion" or something in the same vain, then it only makes sense to also support a women's right to actual abortion. If you don't support financial abortion then you can do whatever you want... but supporting one without the other is pretty hypocritical and definitely not anything resembling equality.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:52 PM
1

Those exams are extremely invasive and traumatizing, No one is arguing this... the difference is that they choose to do it.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:01 AM
18

"I only signed that second form under coercion, I didn't actually mean it". Hell, you could video tape both forms and everything in-between, and they could still say that they "felt threatened" despite no visible reason and the guy could still be put in prison. I've heard feminists talk about that before: "I only said yes because I felt he would get mad if I said no even though he did or said nothing to suggest that".
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:06 PM
20

It's insane. I mean, it's one thing to say that you think maybe schools have poor reporting measures... but that doesn't mean you just get to objectively conclude that there's actually a rape epidemic at that schools. It's fucking insanity. It's not surprising though.. actually, it makes a lot of sense if you legitimately believe that the 1 in 4 number is fact. I mean, if 1 in 4 women are raped, then how is it in any was possible that a school with hundreds of women have zero rapes? That's the p…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:59 PM
3

At this point though... who gives a shit what they say or think that they think.... their actions are those of someone who hates men, and that's all that matters.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:08 AM
1

Sheep are sheep.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:01 PM
1

Oh for sure... it sucks for everyone. Unfortunately that's what happens though when a lot of the stuff is legal, it doesn't really matter what the individual woman wants, because at the point something does happen, it's not really up to her (well it is kind of, but no one's really the same person in a situation like that... so it's impossible to judge).
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:00 PM
1

I guess a more correct statement would have been: " A SAHM/D can contribute..."
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:58 PM
12

*or offer nothing else to the relationship. "Pretty" isn't everything.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:34 PM
2

. I kinda think both parties should contribute. A SAHM/D does contribute....
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:28 PM
15

The gender roles are being erased and certain women are now realizing that the male gender role... the one with all of the responsibility.. wasn't exactly as privileged as they thought it was. As men are allowed to drift from that "standard", they are obviously going to be acting less responsible... I mean, anything would be compared to the extreme hyper-agency that was the norm before. And on the other side of the coin, women are gaining responsibility... but with that responsibility comes more…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:23 PM
12

What I find funny is that my guess would be that it's those exact feelings of entitlement that are causing many men to withdraw. Men (or really anyone) want someone to want them, not just someone that wants their money and their sperm. Here's a good read: http://www.the-american-interest.com/blog/2013/06/19/dr-helen-smith-on-where-the-good-men-are-and-why-they-left/
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:13 PM
12

r, I just think that literally women don't think about the consequences that men face for doing literally some of the same things that they do without a second thought. That's exactly it. Women/girls grow up learning and thinking that their violence towards men has no consequences, so they do it without thinking. Boy hits a boy, he gets punished or he gets hit back. Boy hits a girl, he gets punished or mocked. Girl hits a girl, she gets punished. Girl hits a boy, ....
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:01 PM
19

Agreed. I mean, I don't have a problem with pointing out female perpetuated violence (since it's still massively under-reported)... but I don't think it makes sense to frame it in a way that it's a female-specific problem. Just like it's wrong how feminism is is still trying to frame violence as a male-specific problem. VAWA is bad... but a "VAMA" would be the same.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:58 PM
10

I agree with you for the most part. If anything this just highlights the problems that the whole feminist "everything is rape" campaign creates. Regret it? Rape. Got asked more than once? Rape. Had some alcohol? Rape. Catcalled? Pretty much rape.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:55 PM
1

http://australian-news.net/articles/view.php?id=141
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:40 PM
7

I'm not sure you can say Solanas was being satirical when she actually tried to murder someone.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 07:19 PM
7

You do know that's satire right?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:17 PM
4

I said this in another reply too, but I think a lot of it is coming from the fact that the boy is 16. At least at that age, I think "kids" are old enough to make their own choices. If the kid was 12, or even 14... then I think it's a much safer assumption to say: "you don't actually know what you want". 16 though? Not too sure I agree.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:57 PM
0

I'm not saying it's okay by any means... as I said, I just don't think she needs to have her life ruined.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:56 PM
0

Reverse the roles. When you have a 16 year old female, and 34 year old college professor, no matter whether the girl wanted it or not, she is labelled as the victim, then why not this boy? I'm spinning the femnazi logic on them. Oh for sure 100%. I'm more or less just suggesting that this is probably one of the situations where we should try and bring men "up" rather than bring women "down". She's being charged with rape and forcible sodomy. I'll say the kid is victim. What if he initially agree…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:56 PM
-9

I agree that him being called the aggressor is fucking insane but... is he really the victim? I recognize the obvious double standard that would be present if the genders were reversed... but I think in situations like this, we probably don't need to crucify the adult for agreeing to a minors advances. I do still think they should be punished, because they are an adult with a (hopefully) functioning brain that should know better and we still need to discourage it... but if the minor (of whatever…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:35 PM
1

The lighter you are the less likely it is that you're also carrying any extra muscle Oh for sure... there's definitely a bit of an optimal weight/strength ratio there... but I think it still generally favors a lighter person. A 150lb guy is going to be more likely to be able to do a lot of pushups than a 300lb one.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:33 PM
1

Yeah, pushups really seem like an odd way to measure something because they don't really tell you anything. You could get some 110lb person to do like 100 of them... that doesn't mean they're going to be able to push someone around or restrain them... hell, I could just pick them up. They should really just use bench press or some other actual weight training. Say: "X is the task that we need you to do. Y is the weight that if you can lift that, then you will be able to perform X task sufficient…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:52 PM
2

Is that actually a thing? Some muscles being better at lower weight/high reps and vice versa?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:49 PM
1

What I also don't get is... are pushups really an area where there needs to be a difference? I mean, it's a body-weight exercise... so while yes women are going to be weaker, they are also going to be like 60% of the weight. I think any woman who goes to the gym and weight trains as much as a man who goes to the gym and weight trains wouldn't really have that much of a problem doing the same number of push-ups. My guess is that on average, women probably don't do actual heavy-weight training (if…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:48 PM
1

Maybe have two types of special agents? Ones that are required to do physical things... and others that aren't. The physical ones could have the same physical requirements for men and women, and a slightly higher pay to match. I mean, it's not like every agent is expected to get into a gun battle or some form of physical altercation... so having strict physical requirements for all of them is probably not necessary. I mean right now, I'm assuming a "special agent" is a "special agent"... despite…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:45 PM
1

Who knows... the point is that she could have. I mean, I don't think it's all that likely (especially considering the :) text afterwards)... but it's not definitive.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:09 PM
2

Someone who doesn't know that that is satire is beyond hope anywya.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:41 PM
6

The problem is that you're trying to hold someone that is a woman, responsible for their actions/words in even the smallest amount. You can't do that... women are children and can't be trusted to have actually thought about things before they say or do them. (that shouldn't need sarcasm tag)
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:38 PM
11

I was going to say... the text of "do you have condoms" before an apparent rape isn't really a deal-breaker. It's entirely possible for someone to change their mind between the text and time sex was going to happen, so the text alone isn't really saying much. But everything else... that's pretty ridiculous. Guilty or not... how do you even prove that? All actual evidence points to her wanting and actively seeking out sex with this man... and the only evidence of no consent is just her word vs hi…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:34 PM
7

I remember it too. The lady is just so incredibly self-centered.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:03 PM
1

Ehh... pointing out feminist hypocrisy is useful when feminism is the cause of some of the biggest sources of legal discrimination men face.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:55 AM
3

There's not a problem with that... as long as they recognize that feminism is only about female rights, and they allow other people to look after men. But they don't... they claim feminism is about helping everyone, men and women... and then use that as justification to oppose any effort by any mens-issues focused group and maintain their monopoly on "gender rights".
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:52 AM
19

Why is it a bastardization? IF there's a legitimate reason for a word to exist to describe a male-pov dominated society... there's just as much reason for the opposite, whether you think it's as applicable to the society or not.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 02:10 AM
18

For using a word that has existed for centuries? Are you stupid?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 01:46 AM
2

So our male soldiers get raped by enemy soldiers? That hadn't really crossed my mind before.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:46 AM
3

By who? (not being argumentative, actually curious).
/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:45 PM
3

But there's a point when it goes from pointing out a bad choice to shifting blame. Which I think is a point that is not often reached. And don't get me wrong, it's still a really insensitive thing to say to any victims... And the clothing example is a bad one anyway, because I believe I've read a study that said clothing really had no effect. Other behaviors (drinking) are far more likely to cause something like that to happen.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:50 PM
1

It is unreasonable to demand other potential sexual partners help to enforce it. Ehh... only as unreasonable as it is to "demand" someone else to be a decent human being in any other aspect of their life.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:44 PM
2

I don't know if it's so much being help culpable... it's not like you're shifting any of the blame from the actual perpetrator. It's just pointing out what turned out to be a bad choice.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:41 PM
2

Let's compare it to average salaries. Let's say men and women were surveyed, and asked what their average salary was in the last 30 years. Now for the sake of simplicity, let's say women only entered the work force 15 years ago. So a womans answer to the question would be $0 for 15 years, and then from year 16-30, and on average let's say they started at $20,000 a year and went up another $2000 a year until they made $50,000 a year. When when were asked, let's say they started at $35,000 a year …
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:07 PM
5

Did you tell them that you're an MRA? It'll at least put a face to the strawman that they've built up, and either force them to acknowledge their ignorance... or stop being friends with you (which if happens, probably is for the better).
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:41 PM
1

http://www.iasociety.org/Default.aspx?pageId=11&abstractId=2177677 Granted it's just one study... but still.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:40 PM
1

My favorite part about them pulling the STD card is that the same is also applicable to FGM.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:48 PM
5

Men and boys are entirely capable of functioning normally in the presence of women no matter what they're wearing, and how dare you insult us by suggesting otherwise? I don't find it insulting. Teenagers get horny thats a fact. Being in the presence of more scantily clad members of the opposite sex is distracting... another fact. It's not a matter of whether they can "control" anything or function normally... the vast majority obviously do. The point is that it takes more effort to do so, effort…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:47 PM
1

girls clothing in school is markedly more moderated than boys BECAUSE of the idea that men are sexual beasts that can't help themselves, a thing you probably don't want, yes? Not really. Girls clothing is more moderated because it tends to be a lot more "minimal". If you saw guys wearing short shorts, the same rules should apply to them. Tank tops vs muscle shirts is a little bit different, and it really depends on the tank top. Do they have "spaghetti straps" (is that the term?)? If so, then it…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:41 PM
1

She never said she expected nice guys to line up and worship her I guess people are interpret it differently but the whole: "I'm ready for you guys now" thing kind of implied that these types of people were just waiting there for her... whether she meant it that way or not I'll never know, but to me it sounds like they're doormats. All she said was that her priorities have changed, and IF any nice guys are interested, she's ready for a real relationship. And if that's how it's interpreted, then …
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:31 AM
2

I wish people wouldn't downvote you... but anyways: I don't really see what Isabel has done that deserves being attacked like this If I had to make a guess, it would be her sense of entitlement, and also her complete lack of self-awareness for the hurt she may (or may not) have caused. To get one thing out of the way really quick.... being a "Nice Guy" doesn't entitle you to shit. And to expand that... no one is entitled to anything (in terms of relationships). Anyway, the whole thing is just: "…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:04 PM
1

AVFM is male hating?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:50 PM
-1

The TRP strategy is to focus on self improvement and then use women's selfishness, narcissism and entitlement against them If I might ask... which women? The saying goes... AWALT (All Women Are Like That) Oh....
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:47 PM
3

It wouldn't surprise me. For the type of girl that chased that risky and risque lifestyle ... it's probably not that unlikely that they'd also be the type to basically marry a bank account.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:39 PM
1

They're obsessed with smartphones in a different way though.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:34 PM
1

It's just gynocentrism pure and simple... what's funny though is that it's coming from people who have a habit of saying: "What about the mensZZ!"
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:53 PM
1

The "Don't be that girl" posters focus on false rape accusations... which is actually one of the reasons why I think they are kind of flawed. Not that it isn't a problem... but if you're trying to draw parallels with repeating the same phrasing... why not also use rape?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 07:23 PM
2

Wow you're a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:57 AM
3

No it isnt. If there's no internet, it's not "doxxing".
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:14 PM
1

Not in that context.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:41 PM
2

IF that's how you define victim-blaming, then victim-blaming is really stupid. Am I being "victim-blamed" when I see a billboard telling me to put on my seat belt?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:48 PM
2

You think someone suggesting to not dress sexually suggestive if someone doesn't want extra sexual attention is worthy of massive nude marches ?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:32 PM
3

Because it's based off of really dumb premises. The rallies began after Constable Michael Sanguinetti, a Toronto Police[10] officer, suggested that "women should avoid dressing like sluts" as a precaution against unwanted sexual attention.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:33 PM
15

One, 'women advocacy groups' are not synonymous with 'feminists.' More like, the biggest womens advocacy group in the world. If they had an opinion that the majority of feminists disagreed with, they would not be as popular as they currently are.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:32 PM
8

Ehh, it can be fifty-fifty I think. I've been banned from there on a previous account.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:04 PM
0

I mean, yeah, I would never personally do it, and I wouldn't advise anyone to do it... but if it's already been done, it's like whatever.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 03:04 AM
1

The FBI isn't responsible for criminally prosecuting people though... the individual States have their own laws for that... and most (not all) are a lot better.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:03 PM
3

As long as everything is made anonymous... I personally don't really see a problem. It's just a picture of a faceless penis... it can't harm anyone.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 02:58 PM
2

You are getting your information from mra's and uninformed feminists then. You're now THE source for what is true feminism now?
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:30 PM
2

I'm taking about the actual meaning of the thing, That's it though... you're meaning is very, very different than most other people who use it. If you want to make a subject that takes about cultural factors that may or may not increase/decrease the likelihood of rape and call it "rape culture"... that's fine by me. Most people seem to treat it as: "We live in a rape culture, all these things are geared towards increasing rape and rape alone and so and and so forth". It's just very "beg the ques…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:06 PM
3

They are looking specifically at cultural factors and myths that might increase the likelihood rape, or that rapists might be able to exploit. Who is they? the people that think a schools mascot contributes to rape culture?
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:33 PM
2

d how it manifests in culture/ language and so on? The term could be rape culture... but as I said, it's a meaningless concept if it's defined in a way that allows it to exist in pretty much any western society as they operate today. I'm not saying it can't exist... I'm just saying that the definition being used to say that it currently exists is just so incredibly fucking broad that it's useless.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:03 PM
3

But you're not isolating anything... you can't isolate anything. By that standard, you could literally have a "culture" about anything. At that point, it's clearly not a specific thing causing that specific culture.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:52 PM
3

There is rape culture, murder culture and theft culture, if you like. If there is, then all of it is meaningless. It's all so incredibly vague that it's just unusable to anyone.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:39 PM
4

If you use that definition, it becomes so broad that it just becomes absolutely meaningless. If we live in a rape culture (by your standards)... then we also live in a murder culture, and a theft culture, and an assault culture, etc. To still single out rape above and beyond all of these other crimes that are treated exactly the same, is falsely painting a picture that it's a much bigger problem then it actually is.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:11 PM
2

I went and looked and just... wow. It's amazing how much it's changed in the past 8 years. I guarantee if that same thing was posted today, there would be not one voice of disagreement on that website.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:09 PM
1

Isn't there different levels of assault? I don't actually know, it just seems odd to me that there isn't. Or is there just a very wide range of sentencing? I mean, someone attacking another with a bat isn't quite the same as slapping someone... yet both are clearly assault. Edit: After a little bit of googlefu.. it seems "aggravated assault" is a separate and distinct crime from just "assault".
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:59 PM
14

Sure men are stronger... but if they're required to undertake extra risk, then they should be compensated for it. Same pay for unequal work is stupid.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:20 PM
1

I agree that in the vast majority of times a man would never get off like this in this situation but... just a week or two ago a man did get off in a situation very similar to this.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:16 PM
-1

WHo said that? Just a week or two ago there was a guy in the US that got no jail time after having sex with a 13 year old girl. The girl was shown to be very obviously seeking it out, and no harm was done... so they didn't crucify the guy. It's still wrong, and it still shouldn't have happened... but as long as the message is sent that if it happens again, they won't see the outside for the next decade... I don't really see a problem. I can't read the linked story here, but I'm assuming no coerc…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:15 PM
1

I get that "Attempted X" is a crime... my question is if "attempted rape" is just actually "assault" (which is what he got). I mean, if the attempt to commit a crime is a crime in and of itself (the assault)... do you really need a separate charge for the "attempt" part? I guess someone could get "attempted murder" AND "assault with a deadly weapon"... so maybe there would be an "attempted rape" to go along with the "assault". In which case, yeah, Swedens logic on this is a little bit fucky.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:33 PM
0

I know. But he didn't... Is attempted rape a crime? Or does it fall under assault? (which is what he was charged with?)
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:53 PM
2

Is "attempted rape" a crime? I mean, in this case, his intent was to rape a woman... so he assaulted what he thought to be a woman with the intent to rape... but upon finding out it was a man, he never went through with the rape. That's why he only got assault charges. That makes sense to me.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 08:38 PM
2

. It basically comes down to the assertion that sexual attraction to children is, in itself, a prosecutable offense I don't think so. The problem is when they try and act on that desire and attempt to meet children. I guess if it is actually all roleplay (even by non undercover police officers), then that changes things...
/r/MensRights25/03/14 08:36 PM
2

Following the same logic, police can never put a trap for child molesters in chat rooms, since the "intended victim" is not a child or does not exist and therefore: “The intended crime never has the possibility of being fulfilled,” That's correct though is it not? Do they actually charge the people they catch doing this with child molestation? Or is there another charge that only covers the crime of luring a child? If they didn't actually molest a child, then they can't be charged with child mol…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 08:35 PM
-1

I'm actually not that opposed to that first. I'm skeptical about the honesty of the person in the specific case you mentioned but... it really does make sense to not convict someone as a rapist if they didn't actually intend to rape someone.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 08:34 PM
1

I think that's what bothers me the most. If people take whatever random strangers see about someone on a phone app as 100% gospel... then that really just speaks to their shittiness as a human, so it doesn't really bother me. It's just the blatant double standard of not allowing anything equivalent for women.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:46 PM
6

Yeah... it's like I start punching you in the face, and then between the 4th and 5th punch I say: "You know what? I'm going to be the better man and stop punching you... you should thank me".
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:45 PM
2

IT is clear... which is why he was charged, convicted, and punished within the scope of the law. Or is the law suddenly not satisfactory to you?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:13 AM
0

The words "hebephile" or "euobophile" or whatever are just code for "fucks children" Except it isn't. You can't just redefine words. Is an 18 year old with a 17 year old a pedophile?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:04 AM
-3

Isn't it when Adult Person x has a sexual attraction to an underage person? It's when an adult has sexual attraction to a prepubescent person. As I said, someone whose apparently (I only know what's in the article), is dressing like a 21 year old, and partying and whatever else probably is not prepubescent.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:21 PM
0

I don't think slapping someone on the wrist is a deterrent to anything. This judge is off their rocker. Well he's already committed the crime, so it's not like putting him in jail after the fact would deter anything. He knows if it happens again that ignorance isn't an excuse and he will face jail time. I guess you could argue that this might set a precedent for other people, and I wouldn't disagree.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:19 PM
5

. Who in any first world country doesn't know the age of consent? Apparently a lot of people according to the judges statements. which doesn't make it right. Where are you seeing anyone saying what he was right. He was still charged, still convicted, and still punished. The purpose of punishment is deterrence. And according to the judge, he has been deterred. Mission accomplished.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 08:02 PM
-3

Sure, but in this case, it was still consensual by every other usage of the word... which is why the guy was still charged, convicted and punished... but didn't have his life ruined.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 07:43 PM
-4

I don't think you know what the term pedophilia means.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 07:41 PM
1

She needs to talk to a psychologist or something. Her family obviously isn't there for her. Sure. I would bet my computer he'll knowingly fuck another 14 year old within a year Well you're not the judge. His entire point was that this was sheer ignorance, and now that the perpetrator is educated on that, he won't do it again. He also has this event on his record, so if he did do it again, there would be zero leniency shown. I didn't say that 7 years was reasonable, I said they should see jail ti…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:39 PM
-8

And what purpose does that serve? Is the goal of the justice system punishment, or rehabilitation to prevent re-offenders?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:29 PM
-1

True, but laws are based on our collective society's sensibilities. Enough people share one opinion... laws created. True. Although, at least in the case of this particular law/crime... our "collective society's sensibilities" seem to depend largely on the gender of the perpetrator. It's a good thing the judge didn't follow that. That being said, rigid laws that don't allow for nuance are also something I'm not comfortable with. Sounds like this one specifically did allow some nuance, based on h…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:29 PM
1

These is certainly a debate that psychological harm was done to an already emotionally harmed minor. Which presumably was had in the courtroom. the law was broken. Agreed, but I'm not sure we agree on in which way.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:27 PM
5

I'm critiquing because sometimes we get a bit sensationalist ourselves and i wanted to avoid charges of hypocrisy. Yeah for sure. I agreed with you on that part as well.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:23 PM
-5

But we all agree that woman get away with stuff like this. I think we all agree that there is a massive double standard in the way men and women are treated. I think you are mistaken that "we all agree" that the way men get punished is the correct one. They should be held to the same standard, Yes. the standard shouldn't be lowered. In your opinion. As I asked you above... what harm was done? Why does this man deserve to have his life absolutely ruined for giving a girl exactly what she wanted b…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:07 PM
-4

What harm was done?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:02 PM
3

But there is nothing wrong with demanding that these punishment are determined in a rational and calm manner, and aren't subject to sensationalist bullshit. Well said... Though I will say the teacher+student situation is a little bit different. You can't ignore the position of power the teacher holds, which changes the dynamic a little bit. I guess if you can prove that the student was actively seeking it, then it could be judged the same as the case in the OP was... but that's probably hard to …
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:01 PM
-2

I think a girl who, while still 13 is apparently dressing as a 21 year old and going to bars and partying like that probably doesn't look, nor were they acting like a child. I have a hard time calling that pedophilia... since I can pretty safely assume she'd be physically mature. All that being said, what he did was still wrong, which is why he was still convicted of a crime.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:58 PM
-9

but I'm just not comfortable with that much age disparity. It's a good thing laws aren't based on your sensibilities then. What he did was still a crime, and he was still charged... but in the end, no one was hurt... so why ruin his life? He got the appropriate punishment that should (as the judge said) make it so hes not seen their again... that should be the entire point of the justice system.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:57 PM
-8

You really think 7 years in jail for what was consensual sex is a fitting punishment?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:54 PM
8

Yeah, it really says a lot about people who use the "but that's only radfems" argument when shit like that can still get a pass in mainstream news sites.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:40 PM
1

That was my only point.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:04 AM
5

That's what jumped out at me as well. I mean, they're insinuating that a single word is single-handedly keeping out the female half of the population from leadership roles... like really?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:57 AM
1

Give the intruder a chance to disprove that claim, under the threat of gunpoint. If he actually is an intruder, maybe then shoot... cause rapey is rapey. Well I think he was... until the kid made a sudden movement (at least as the story said). Don't get me wrong, the dad is a total fucking nutcase... and that being said, I think Castle Doctrine and even SYG laws are fucking nuts too, but under that those laws, his actions weren't THAT unwarranted considering the information he was given. But I w…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:59 PM
0

You see a boy in your daughters room. She just told you he was an intruder.... what exactly do you think the father thought the intent was for an intruder to break in and sneak into his daughters bedroom? Then when he (as the story says at least) makes a sudden movement... well, you think that this intruder/attempted rapist is making a move for something.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:18 PM
1

She's definitely guilty of something. Let me copy/paste a comment I made in the SRD thread: Some important tidbits: All states except Arizona, Arkansas, Missouri, and Tennessee recognize that some categories of false statements are so innately harmful that they are considered to be defamatory per se. Bullet right under that: Allegations or imputations of criminal activity And from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire The supreme courts decision: These include the lewd and ob…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:15 PM
6

Don't forget though, that if the story in the article (at least the original one I had read)... the girl was probably panicking and not thinking clearly. That doesn't make what she did less wrong, I'm just saying we can't say it was 100% this intentional malicious thing.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:14 PM
2

Was going to say this: Ask her if she thinks you need to be taught not to rape girls.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:26 AM
4

Oh, so now he's actively advocating the rape of children.... you're an idiot. Even in this: "Incest is like a magnifying glass," he summarizes. "In some circumstances it magnifies the beauty of the relationship... It's just an observation from the surveys of people who were actually in those situations. He even acknowledges that in most cases, it didn't result in anything positive. Which is why from the very beginning, his stance was that he never condones/recommends/suggests it at all.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:05 PM
3

Then it's an opinion he no longer holds... so who the fuck cares? You're being completely ridiculous right now.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:41 PM
3

And you know perfectly well that there is zero chance that he said "generally caressing". Except for the fact that he's always and only ever said that that was a misquote. Even in the worst case scenario of it not being a misquote but he just changed his mind afterwards... you're still criticizing someone for an opinion they don't hold, and haven't held for like three decades. Do I need to tell you how fucking stupid that is? And that's the absolute 100% worst case.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:38 PM
3

Debunk what? He did a study,... that is what actual incestuous families told him. Despite any of that, he's still opposed to it. I mean, good god you're fucking retarded. As for the second quote... he's said multiple times that it was a misquote from "generally caressing". See: http://voiceofreaaaasoooon.blogspot.ca/2012/12/ive-seen-quotes-floating-around-about-dr.html
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:40 PM
6

It's like naming every Christian an enemy Let's say the "fight" is over gay marriage... and the Catholic church (the people in charge) are openly opposing gay marriage. If that was the case, then every single member of the Catholic church (not every Christian, as that is what the different denominations are for) would in fact be guilty. By identifying as a Catholic, they are giving social credit and support to the Catholic church... by extension, they are responsible for the actions of the Catho…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:17 AM
2

Not really trying to argue... just calling you an idiot.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:08 AM
3

What does this have to do with actually helping men? You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:36 PM
10

He had no views on incest.... that's how you know they're (for lack of a better term): fucking retards. He did a study where he interviewed victims (the kids) of incestuous relationships and asked whether it was a positive or negative experience. All he did was note that quite a large (maybe even a majority) of male victims reported a positive experience, and still a large number for female victims (but less than male). His conclusion was that despite the numbers showing that there's a fairly go…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:35 PM
6

That person is really stupid. "Hey, we're about equality... so let's coddle feminists!".
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:32 PM
3

. But it's not my choice, and it never will be. You see what I mean? Not really relevant when talking about murder.The government (the people) have a duty to protect it's citizens.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:16 PM
1

This reminds me of that thing where people post pictures of their vaginas on posters in public and shit. I also think there was a magazine in Australia that had the frontpage just covered. Can you imagine what would happen if guys did that? Post dick shots everywhere? Pretty sure they'd be arrested and put on the sex-offenders registry.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:31 PM
2

As long as it makes her look purdy do you think she really cares? Wouldn't be the first time feminists whine about being objectification and shit like that... and then turn around and take full advantage of it.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:29 PM
3

Not that I'm against abortion in any way... but just for the sake of argument: I really hate this whole "my body my choice" line of thinking when it comes to abortion... because honestly, it's irrelevant. If the fetus is a full-person with full-rights, then it doesn't matter if it's in a woman's body... that doesn't justify murder. If that's the line of thinking you use to justify abortion, then you can easily justify infanticide as well... which is why I find it so flawed. Personally, I think t…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:28 PM
6

Wait... really? That's just fucking gold. I don't even think the networth of my entire family is that much....
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:15 PM
0

That's still pretty fricken expensive. That's the mortgage payment on a cheaper house where I live.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:13 PM
0

Not really... The whole point of "men don't rape, rapists rape" is to fight the implication that all men are potential rapists.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:49 PM
1

The gall of some of these female writers is just fucking astounding. I mean, imagine any article by any man that would even remotely hint at even the thought of telling any woman what to do.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:19 PM
0

Do you know what the definition of "sarcasm" is? Or are you just stupid?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:00 PM
2

This is a men's rights group yet people act like this is a n anti-women's group while complaining about feminists being anti-men. Please tell me how anything in this thread is anti-women? PLEASE.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:16 PM
1

Yes... IF (and that's a big if) it's rape.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 02:00 AM
3

Everyone is pressured into everything they do in some form or another. At the end of the day, she still had the choice, and she still consented... regardless of whether the pros/cons of those choices were possibly different. When we're talking about a crime whose single most defining factor is going against someones choice, well, you're pretty fucking stupid to ignore that aspect. Stop conflating abuse with rape, they are nothing alike. Abuse is abuse whether the persons sees it/wants it or not.…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 01:17 AM
7

It's not really hard to find out whether something was rape or not: Was the sex consensual? Yes? Was there any illegal coercion used? No? Not rape.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 01:13 AM
1

Since feminist clubs and organizers are directing the mayhem, why not just pull the funds from money earmarked for feminist organizations and faculty members? I think that would depend on how involved those clubs are. If it just happens to be the few members of leadership of the club, but the club isn't "officially" doing it... then there's no need to make every other member suffer who wasn't involved by removing their money. Anything else is an incentive for the rabble to make a bigger tantrum …
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:49 PM
9

No, what they should be doing is arresting the protesters and expelling them from the school. (the ones pulling the fire alarms and/or being violent... aka the ones making the security fee necessary).
/r/MensRights04/02/14 12:21 AM
2

She had nothing to do with trying to destroy the evidence as well?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:31 AM
0

I know, you were talking about "radical anti-feminists". And if you're calling any of the people posting here "radical anti-feminists", then I think what I said holds just fine.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:25 PM
-1

Radical anti-mens-rights and radical anti-feminists are exactly the same, and neither help their respective causes. Last I checked, the MRM isn't responsible for enacting laws that discriminate against women. So no, they aren't the same thing.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:30 PM
-1

Well that's true too, but there's is a lot of anti-feminist circlejerking that does go on here. And that's a bad thing because....
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:28 PM
0

but the majority of what gets upvoted, sadly is. Tell me what's on the front page right now.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:26 PM
0

You should see this discussion I'm in right now. Here, I'll link you to the tail end of it (don't go and vote or participate.. this isn't a call for help). http://np.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1wdnvb/unpopular_opinion_puffin_shares_popular_opinion/cf1l153
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:04 PM
1

And he's arguing that the SCUM Manifesto is not an extremist viewpoint based on the exact same criteria. Though personally I'd rather use the Duluth model or something as an example. That was a policy passed and used nationally, that's pretty much the definition of mainstream, and it's 100% created by feminism.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:05 PM
24

That author is such a fucking idiot. He says: (my emphasis) Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) made the case Sunday that the war on women is non-existent because the women in his own family are thriving professionally Now, let's see what Rand Paul said: . I have a niece at Cornell vet school, and 85% of the young people there are women. Law school, 60% are women. In med school, 55%. I guess the only thing we can take from this, is that Rand Paul is related to 85% of the population at Cornell vet school.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:05 PM
3

Not that it'd hurt... but it's still no guarantee. Maybe you stole her phone and sent it yourself, maybe you coerced her to send the text, maybe she sent the text before the sex and then changed her mind before it actually started. If you can get her to send you a text the next morning, that would probably do a lot more, as it eliminates most of the above "alternate explanations"... but really that's no guarantee.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:25 PM
1

No, I'm still going to bash him. Being too stupid to look into things yourself isn't an excuse for vitriol.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:26 PM
4

affirmative action doesn't count as discrimination. Says? Last I checked, the definition of discrimination doesn't include the phrase: "unless otherwise noted by BetaFlight".
/r/MensRights21/01/14 04:51 AM
1

Yeah, that definitely sounds pretty fitting. Especially considering Jobs and his use of buzzwords as well... which to me is like a big red flashing beacon that says: "I don't actually know what I'm talking about, but I read a "X for dummies" book on it once and memorized these words".
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:42 PM
2

Is it the safe route? Sure. Is it always the best route to have to constantly be treading carefully? I don't think so. It's a lot easier to say "this sucks" versus "well, this looks oookaayy, but at least you put in a good effort but could you maybe do this and this and this?" It's still just rather people be honest with who they are and cut out all the false niceties.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:40 PM
3

You still don't get it. "a good work environment" is a completely subjective thing. My department swears and ribs on each other all of the time. I'm even the new guy and I'm at the receiving end of the majority of it, and you know what? I think it's hilarious and I wouldn't have it any other way. Also, just as a minor nitpick... I think you mean "colleagues" not "colleges". Would you go to a college for help if every time you asked him he calls you stupid for not knowing the answer already or to…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:08 PM
8

The fact of the matter is, being nice is more effective in the work place I disagree, therefore you are wrong (and you are, I'm not just being an ass). Literally the entire point of that post was to point out how people are different, and expecting one way to be a "fact of the matter" and apply universally to the entire group of employees is just asinine. This is why it's more important to just not give a shit about the intrapersonal politics and just get work done. If you don't like someone, th…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:32 PM
25

I think that whole exchange serves as a very good example of the gender interactions in a lot of other fields too. Look at Anita Sarkeesian, she's the exact same way. I want all of you guys to change this space to fit me and my sensibilities. And then when people don't, it's suddenly a hostile and sexist place towards women... when in reality, it's just people not bending over backwards to accommodate single people. Sarah was doing the exact same thing. Rather than just thinking: "Linus curses, …
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter