| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no sense | Purple Discussion | StrawberryFieldsfor | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/03/14 12:26 AM |
| 13 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategy | StrawberryFieldsfor | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 05:10 AM | |
| 10 | Has your view of a topic ever been changed here on PurplePillDebate? | Discussion | StrawberryFieldsfor | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/05/14 03:14 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Are the majority of gender dynamics due to patriarchy rather than biology?Evolution doesn't give a fuck what women or anyone else enjoys. I'm quite certain male mantis' don't enjoy getting eaten after boning. Whoa, there. That is totally false. Human females have certainly evolved to enjoy PIV sex and to desire it. The clitoris is an organ whose sole purpose is pleasure. It is the only organ in the human body with that sole function. Penises obviously are integral to male reproduction and pleasure, but clitorises are not needed for a woman to become pregnant. In addit… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/10/14 05:19 PM |
| 11 | [Somewhat OT]Can a Husband "sexually harrass" his Wife?I do not believe the wife should have the power to deny her husband sex whenever she feels like it. People should have the power to control who sticks things inside of their bodies. Jesus, are you from the 1800's or something? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/14 07:11 PM |
| 14 | [Somewhat OT]Can a Husband "sexually harrass" his Wife?Anyone should be able to reject any sexual advances they choose, from anybody for whatever reason they desire. If your wife does it too often and you don't like it, get a divorce. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/14 07:02 PM |
| 59 | TRP: Women are inferior or different?Currently, the red pill post has an 83% upvote margin. It also states, in no uncertain terms, that women literally... are meant to be your slaves are machines to produce children are less rational are inferior (2 different quotes) are two-faced have no character have no honor have no virtue are incapable of sympathy or remorse are incapable of loving men are god of death, the wind, the underworld, the ever-burning entrance to hell, the knife-edge, poison, serpent, and fire are glittering mud, a … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/09/14 09:33 PM |
| 3 | RPW and TRP: Article favorably compares techniques of abusers with PUA/TRP techniques. What do you think about this?Katrina Katniss. Her name is Katniss. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/14 06:17 AM |
| 4 | Are red pill men wrong in treating women like children?shrieking feminist harpies who want blood. Uh huh. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/14 10:32 PM |
| 2 | Are red pill men wrong in treating women like children?I'm not familiar with Title IX, so someone more knowledgeable than me should answer these questions. I assume that the ultimate goal was to make it easier for rape victims to report the crime, but certainly the innocent-until-proven-guilty concept should still apply to accused men. And when both partners were heavily inebriated and both consented at the time, I don't think it should be labelled as rape. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/14 09:41 PM |
| 9 | Are red pill men wrong in treating women like children?All the up voted comments on /r/twoxchromosomes (a sub often criticized for being too feminist) disagreed that the male student in this case was a rapist. See here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/14 09:19 PM |
| 10 | Are red pill men wrong in treating women like children?Funny, I read this article on /r/twoxchromosomes just yesterday. Sounds like they both made a bad judgement call while both being heavily inebriated, but it wasn't sexual assault. I have a major issue with OP's take away, though. Women's decisions are the responsibility of men near them. Women cannot be held accountable for their actions if they regret them. You disagree with this, right? You think its a wrong legal position to take, otherwise you'd be saying, "Of course he was expelled! Women, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/14 07:56 PM |
| 12 | Is the notion that men hit their SMV peak at 35 wishful thinking?As a 20 yr old woman, I agree. I'd never date a 35 yr old man at this age. Sorry, guys, but that's old and stuff. 23 would be the max age for me to be comfortable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/06/14 06:24 AM |
| 2 | Men of BP, how often do you get laid (and by what kinds of women)?No problem :) What goes around comes around, right? I wish you the best of luck. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/06/14 06:14 AM |
| 3 | Men of BP, how often do you get laid (and by what kinds of women)?Btw, good on you for being one of the few people around here that seems to have common sense and decency. There aren't enough BP Men on this sub in my opinion. I usually just lurk, but you always have the best comments on here, aside from that "Science pill" flair person. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/06/14 06:00 AM |
| 1 | Men of BP, how often do you get laid (and by what kinds of women)?What's your age, if I might ask? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/06/14 04:07 AM |
| 2 | Has your view of a topic ever been changed here on PurplePillDebate?I'm sorry to hear about your situation. It seems like you might be depressed? Idk. In any case, loneliness sucks. I do have a question, though. Do you have normal friendships with guys, or does your lack of a social spark extend to men, too? And also, another serious question: if you don't like thinking about women because of all the negative emotions it brings, why are you on this sub, discussing a lot of things about women? You write beautifully (if morbidly), by the way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/05/14 12:53 AM |
| 5 | Is TRP worth debating? For people who are opposed to TRP, does engaging with TRP validate their position?Here's how you don't become a stay-at-home-dad: "OMG there are people who disagree with the lifestyle I want, so I immidiately gave up on it and now I whine about how society won't let me have anything." What are you even talking about? As for Briffault's law, why don't you explain how it applies to the red pill? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/05/14 09:08 PM |
| 15 | Is TRP worth debating? For people who are opposed to TRP, does engaging with TRP validate their position?Oh, stop it. Every single one of those ideas are regularly upvoted in TRP. Most of them are included in the fucking sidebar. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/05/14 09:01 PM |
| 8 | Is TRP worth debating? For people who are opposed to TRP, does engaging with TRP validate their position?Your own links state: Unemployed men themselves were more likely to initiate divorce. ...So therefore, women are hypergamous? No...According to the article, unemployed men feel like they're not fulfilling their masculine role properly and become unhappy and get divorced. The solution would be to make it socially acceptable for men to be stay-at-home-dads, in my opinion. Not point fingers at women and yell, "Hypergamy!". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/05/14 08:54 PM |
| 15 | Is TRP worth debating? For people who are opposed to TRP, does engaging with TRP validate their position?And so you respond by doing the same? Two wrongs don't make a right. And do you have any other response to what I posted? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/05/14 08:24 PM |
| 16 | Is TRP worth debating? For people who are opposed to TRP, does engaging with TRP validate their position?TRP is filled with guys like you who have had bad experiences with women. You have a right to be angry--at the person who wronged you--but not at the entire fucking gender, 50% of the population. But that's what the red pill does. It uses anecdotal evidence, just like yours, to make sweeping claims about all women. And voila, you have a community steeped in confirmation bias, already hurting, reporting only the examples and experiences that line up with their philosophy, generating a circle jerk… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/05/14 08:18 PM |
| 19 | Is TRP worth debating? For people who are opposed to TRP, does engaging with TRP validate their position?TRP is despised because its doctrine is hateful towards women and it doesn't have much evidence for the pseudoscience stuff that gets regularly up voted. When TRP says "Men and women are different," it really means: women are emotional, not logical or reasonable; women cannot unconditionally love, but men can; women are automatically searching for a more "valuable" partner and will screw you over if given the chance; women do not mature past being a teenager; women are highly manipulative but in… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/05/14 07:38 PM |
| 4 | Social justice advocates of Reddit, why is rape bad in movies?Nobody wants to be raped. It takes away someone's control over their own body and can be very painful, like you said. It makes people feel subhuman and worthless. A rape fantasy is completely different. From the comfort of your own mind, or with a partner you trust, it can be really sexy. The adrenaline rush of wondering what will happen next; the illusion of fear that turns into pleasure; the feeling of being so desired that he needs to have you; being physically overpowered but not actually hu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/05/14 08:33 PM |
| 2 | Social justice advocates of Reddit, why is rape bad in movies?Great explanation, it gave me a new perspective in rape as shown in games and movies. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/05/14 09:58 PM |
| 8 | Social justice advocates of Reddit, why is rape bad in movies?No, no, no. Rape fantasies arouse some women--about 4 in 10 actually. But watching a movie/tv show realistically depict a rape is often really uncomfortable and heart-wrenching. I am in no way aroused by the rapes shown on Game of Thrones. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/05/14 09:54 PM |
| 4 | Social justice advocates of Reddit, why is rape bad in movies?I don't think rape in movies is bad, as long as the movie portrays it as the horrible thing it is. (Like Girl with Dragon Tattoo, for example.) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/05/14 05:53 AM |
| 1 | EvoPsych Question: if hypergamy is in-built to women, why isnt the desire to be alpha in-built to men?I'm going to bed. I'll reply later. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/05/14 07:18 AM |
| 4 | EvoPsych Question: if hypergamy is in-built to women, why isnt the desire to be alpha in-built to men?There is very little evidence on TRP besides blog posts and anecdotal evidence, which is heavily biased due to the community it is in. The burden of proof is on you, not me, because you are the one making claims about all women. And my three examples, though not evidence for a whole group of people acting a certain way, are a valid counter to AWALT. If AWALT, then my three examples would not exist. In addition, my three example women are essentially random. They're my three apartment-mates. It's… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/05/14 07:00 AM |
| 3 | EvoPsych Question: if hypergamy is in-built to women, why isnt the desire to be alpha in-built to men?I've read it. It's really sad that you buy into it. Just because it's a post on the internet doesn't make it true. All women seek the most "alpha" or high value man possible? Ok...what about my three good friends, the first people that come to mind. S has been with her boyfriend for over a year. He's really into gaming, gets great grades, and is from a foreign country. He's pretty skinny but has attractive features. They get along wonderfully, with a shared sense of humor and love of video games… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/05/14 06:37 AM |
| 4 | If the 50's Were the Golden Age of RP Men, then How and Why have Things Changed Since then?And then your son will see that you treat him more harshly and be resentful of both you and his sister. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/05/14 05:22 AM |
| 7 | If the 50's Were the Golden Age of RP Men, then How and Why have Things Changed Since then?Pussy's been around ever since...ever. Feminism is relatively new. If the powerful men didn't agree to the new policies, they wouldn't have happened. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/05/14 05:20 AM |
| 2 | EvoPsych Question: if hypergamy is in-built to women, why isnt the desire to be alpha in-built to men?Once she has reached a threshold in looks, it's entirely her personality that matters. And he's quite willing to stay with her for life if she is that great of a woman. It's the exact same for most women. It's your own self-absorption that makes you blind to that fact. As u/dead-or-alive said, when told that women would leave their husbands for George Clooney, I cannot think of any scenario where I would dump my boyfriend for anyone. We've been together for 10 years and hoping we get another 60 … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/05/14 05:13 AM |
| 4 | Why have women never oppressed an entire gender?Except they have. Just look at Saudi Arabia. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/14 05:28 PM |
| 5 | For those who believe male-dominated relationships are best, what qualifies a man to make life decisions for a woman? Why do you prefer to shoulder the responsibility of the relationship's wellbeing instead of sharing it like a more typical couple?Most women would not realize they want a dominant/traditional man until they meet one they were attracted to and respected. If someone gave you a bunch of examples, or even statistics, about sexually assertive women, you could still claim this. Literally 100% of women could be sexually dominant and aggressive and you could still claim this. Women could go around raping men violently with robo-penises, forcing them to collectively go into hiding in a twisted dystopia, and you could still claim th… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/14 05:17 PM |
| 2 | For those who believe male-dominated relationships are best, what qualifies a man to make life decisions for a woman? Why do you prefer to shoulder the responsibility of the relationship's wellbeing instead of sharing it like a more typical couple?Those things don't qualify men to make life decisions for women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/14 04:51 PM |
| 2 | Why is TRP so anti-education?No, your literal point was along the lines of modern education consisting of pointless bullshit. However, your use of extreme exaggeration only damaged your point since it was far too fantastical. I used sarcasm to refute your extreme exaggeration because it was ridiculous, and also because I don't agree with your literal point. Are we done here? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/14 07:41 AM |
| 2 | Why is TRP so anti-education?I'm pointing out just how ridiculous your statement is. Most students only take one history class, if any, unless they're a history major. They take extensive classes in their area of study that promotes skills needed in their job markets. It wan't hyperbole; it was fantasy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/14 05:35 AM |
| 2 | Why is TRP so anti-education?Oh, good, I'm glad to know that all I have to do to earn my degree in Wildlife Ecology is to write some 20-page papers about Queen Elizabeth. My friends with majors of Chemical Engineering, Computer Science, English, Biological Chemistry, and Asian Studies will be pleased to hear it, too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/14 05:05 AM |
| 6 | For those who believe male-dominated relationships are best, what qualifies a man to make life decisions for a woman? Why do you prefer to shoulder the responsibility of the relationship's wellbeing instead of sharing it like a more typical couple?Actually, women now have slightly higher scores on IQ tests than men. Also, the idea that girls are innately worse at logical subjects like math has been conclusively disproven Physical strength is generally superior in males, who have a much greater capacity to build muscle. Eh, 1/3. That's an F. You should really think before you type. Or at least learn how to use google. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/14 04:41 AM |
| 9 | For those who believe male-dominated relationships are best, what qualifies a man to make life decisions for a woman? Why do you prefer to shoulder the responsibility of the relationship's wellbeing instead of sharing it like a more typical couple?She chooses to be a traditional woman. Choices are good. Women can choose to be traditional, or they can choose to pursue an egalitarian relationship. Whatever works best for their personality. A lot of women used to be really unhappy and bored in the '50s style traditional marriages that the Red Pill thinks would secretly make every woman happy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/14 04:29 AM |
| 3 | Redpillers do know that promiscuity doesn't effect the appearance of a vulva...right?Because religious people, who are most likely to stay virginal til marriage, are also reluctant to get divorces. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/04/14 06:35 PM |
| 8 | Redpillers do know that promiscuity doesn't effect the appearance of a vulva...right?How in the world does having a lot of sex use up a woman's empathy? Or her enthusiasm? Or wonder? Or capacity to love? This is one of the most bullshit, no-evidence things I've ever heard on this sub. The fact that it is getting upvoted is really upsetting and making me doubt that I should even bother coming here anymore. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/04/14 09:10 AM |
| 4 | Women defintionOr you could embrace a sex-positive mindset. Be happy if you fuck someone. See that other people can be happy fucking other people. Realize that women also have high sex drives. And realize that as long as they are free of STDs and use birth control, another person's sexual history doesn't really matter. If you choose to start an LTR with a virginal woman, that's your choice. But you don't need to have contempt for women who have sex with people other than you. Dude...I'm not trying to belittle … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 03:40 AM |
| 4 | "Men are entitled to be angry about being lied to!"I'm also talking more about modern feminism too (which is arguably much worse) You made a blanket statement. So now support it. Tell me why. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 03:30 AM |
| 3 | Women defintionNo, I'm not downvoting your responses. But wow. What a sad, shitty world you live in. A world in which you have contempt for a woman ("slut", "plate") that you sleep with, because she is sleeping with you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 03:13 AM |
| 6 | "Men are entitled to be angry about being lied to!"Little evidence of abusive relationships? Or workplace harassment? Or job discrimination? Or not equal pay? Have you ever taken a history class? It is only because of feminism that these issues have largely been relegated to the past. It is only because women worked to end these problems that they are less common now. Men should not be subject to these problems, either. I fully support men's resources when leaving an abusive relationship, for example. I detest discrimination against males if the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 03:03 AM |
| 4 | "Men are entitled to be angry about being lied to!"So what exactly do you advocate? Forcing women only to do childcare while men are only allowed to work? That's not actually supported by anything remotely scientific if you look at anthropological studies of early humans. Do you realize that hunter-gatherer tribes were egalitarian? Both sexes provided food--men hunted, and women gathered. Everyone shared their food as a group. Women did not belong to men, either. There were not permanent pair-bonds until the advent of agriculture, when property … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 02:50 AM |
| 3 | Women defintionYour response had nothing relevant to say. Figure out how to debate. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 02:21 AM |
| 14 | "Men are entitled to be angry about being lied to!"Here are some things that normal feminists believe: Women have a right to vote, just as men do Women have a right to pursue a career if they choose Women have a right to work in the home if they choose Women have a right to be financially independent if they choose to be Women have a right to control their own reproduction (via birth control, abortion, etc.) Women should have resources to leave abusive relationships (ex. battered women's shelters) Women should not be sexually harassed in the wor… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 02:15 AM |
| 4 | "Men are entitled to be angry about being lied to!"Before the sexual revolution, it was really, really scandalous for women to have pre-marital sex. Birth control was also not widely available. Men didn't go out to bars and meet women and look for casual sex; that was just not the norm. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 02:00 AM |
| 9 | "Men are entitled to be angry about being lied to!"You do realize that before feminism, guys had to either visit a prostitute or get married in order to have sex? You should be thanking feminism with all your heart if you enjoy casual sex. And what exactly about feminism is not backed by science? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 01:37 AM |
| 2 | Are women who are receptive to redpill traits poor relationship choices...In the movies, yeah. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 01:24 AM |
| 5 | Women defintionFunny how you have nothing but contempt for a FWB woman--but how often does TRP advise spinning plates? Fucking hypocrites. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/14 01:18 AM |
| 17 | Are women who are receptive to redpill traits poor relationship choicesIf you want a long term relationship rather than casual sex, cocky-arrogance and selfishness is harming you, rather than helping you, and that the women who can't control themselves around cocky arrogant men are the most likely to cheat. It's clear what OP is saying. And being fit, well-dressed, and confident is not an exclusively red pill tactic. That's just common sense, Attraction 101. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/14 11:17 PM |
| 21 | Are women who are receptive to redpill traits poor relationship choicesI wasn't talking about being more attractive. I was talking about being a cocky, arrogant asshole. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/14 10:44 PM |
| 9 | What should a woman do if she is a slut?I am NOT saying the marriages are shitty. I'm saying IF the marriage is shitty, a religious woman who was a virgin till marriage most likely won't get a divorce. Religion is the cause of both the virginity and the reluctance to get divorced. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/14 10:39 PM |
| 23 | Are women who are receptive to redpill traits poor relationship choicesThis is definitely true. Using tactics to attract women that are shallow and have low self-esteem attract…you guessed it! Women that are shallow with low self-esteem! These are not the ones you want for a relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/14 10:08 PM |
| 6 | What should a woman do if she is a slut?Apparently my mom is a myth. TIL. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/14 10:04 PM |
| 9 | What should a woman do if she is a slut?Yeah, because people with conservative views that withhold sex until marriage don't like divorce at all. Even if the marriage is shitty. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/14 09:49 PM |
| 0 | What should a woman do if she is a slut?I'm sorry, what? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/14 09:16 PM |
| 17 | What should a woman do if she is a slut?Ha. Or, you know, women in happy marriages that have successful careers and kids. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/14 10:06 AM |
| 6 | Can women love?I've said this before, and I'll say it again. Sometimes women will "trade up" if they think they can get a richer man; sometimes men will leave their wife to get a prettier and younger girlfriend if they can. It happens all the time, both ways. Red Pill men don't seem to deny that. But this is where the logical fallacy occurs: When men leave women, is it proof of inherent male hypergamy? Of course not. For men who truly love their wives, men can unconditionally love. What about if their wives ar… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/04/14 03:22 AM |
| 2 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseStudies have shown that men are more likely to cheat on their spouses than women are. Therefore these men are more likely to stay in an unhappy marriage and instead have an affair. Also, men may be reluctant to get divorced out of fear of losing custody of their kids. (I'm all for joint custody, by the way.) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/04/14 07:13 AM |
| 0 | Don't try and defend TRP. Don't talk about TRP.That was me. I'm the mother fucker. Here's a screenshot of the exchange you're talking about. Men, I suggest reading it before you believe puaSenator here. It actually took me 5 seconds to find your past comment, because all I did was search your history by "Top" instead of "Hot." It was your most up voted red pill comment to date. | /r/TheRedPill | 31/03/14 03:36 AM |
| 1 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseSo the norm is that women are disloyal? What about studies that show married men cheat at a higher rate than married women? What about the study that showed women were much more likely to stay in marriages with sick men than vice versa? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/03/14 01:05 AM |
| 4 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseIf a woman becomes cold and/or unfaithful that is when he will begin to consider leaving her. I'm completely fine with man that leaves a women if there is a real problem in her behavior. And I'm completely fine with a woman who leaves a man for a real problem in his behavior. However, when a women does it, it is seen as legitimate, when a man does it, it is seen as illegitimate. And the so the Red Pill's solution is to...say that when a man does it, it's legitimate, but when a woman does it, it'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/03/14 01:01 AM |
| 1 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseLook, you have to accept the fact that both women and men love opportunistically a lot of the time. In relationships, they enjoy the other's physical appearance and enjoy the other's company. If they combine incomes, they can live better. They get sex easily, with a bonus of having an emotional connection. What I am describing here is the basis of a couple living together. They both benefit, right? The problem is when TRP says (untruthfully) that women have no capacity for true love, but that me… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/03/14 12:50 AM |
| 1 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseWhere in this post have I said anything about how relationships come about? I have simply demonstrated how untrue the statement is that women only love men opportunistically. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/03/14 12:25 AM |
| 2 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseAre my parents, who have been married for nearly 30 years in a loving, egalitarian relationship, merely a fairy tale? What's sad is that you think Disney holds a copyright on love. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/03/14 12:01 AM |
| 3 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseYep. Good ol' puaSenator had the top comment in this thread. It is his most upvoted Red Pill comment to date. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/03/14 04:52 PM |
| 17 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseI don't know, dude. You say here in this thread that men and women just love differently, neither in an inferior way. If that's what TRP believed, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But...can I quote you from a few months ago? Women, generally do not have that kind of love for their man. She may care for him a lot, and genuinely feel connected, but she will never have the same type of love we are capable of. She may think she has it, when she's knee deep in lust and infatuation, but she has no p… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/03/14 06:33 AM |
| 21 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseMen love idealistically, women love opportunistically. So, if you wanted to critique this, you say, "you are saying that men are superior than women, because they are idealists and women are opportunists!" (outrage boner!) But you could just rewrite Rollo's adage as, "men love naively, women love wisely." No feminist is going to complain about that slogan. If you think about it, it implies something very, very similar. The whole point of this post is that this idea just...isn't true. None of it.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/03/14 05:12 AM |
| 15 | Why TRP's view of "Women in love" makes no senseStill, being angry is not an excuse for perpetuating the blatant and damaging lie that women are incapable of true love (but men are capable). And by damaging, I mean damaging to young impressionable men. All the time, I see posts on TRP from young guys who buy into it. They are really depressed that women can never love them back, yet they think it's some unavoidable truth. I remember a post from a young guy who saw no point in ever pursuing LTRs because TRP made him think a woman would always … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/03/14 02:51 AM |
| 1 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategyThanks for actually reading the essay instead of just the excerpt I posted. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 09:16 AM |
| 4 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategySuch as? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 08:40 AM |
| 4 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategyYou know, I think I described the RP beliefs about the sexes pretty accurately there. If it's a straw man, which part is incorrect, then? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 08:40 AM |
| 3 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategyIt's completely true that women have evolved to be choosier than men when it comes to sexual partners. I'm not surprised to hear that a lot more women have reproduced in the past than men did. It makes sense. I just don't subscribe to a lot of the other views that the Red Pill espouses about inherent mental differences between men and women. The idea that women are more emotional, or can't use logic, or can't love unconditionally, or don't have honor, for example. These ideas do not have scienti… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 08:22 AM |
| 7 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategyI am not at all saying that red pillers are racist or have lower intelligence. But, there is an undeniable similarity between the strategy and rhetoric of "race realists" and The Red Pill. Here's a quote from the essay: "Both male supremacist and white supremacist ideologies continue these age-old lines of argument by placing significant emphasis on genetics or biology as the determinant for whole sets of social behaviour (Dobratz & Shanks-Meile, 2004, p. 115, 120; The Futurist, 2010; Lono12, 20… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 08:03 AM |
| 6 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategySure, there are plenty of peer-reveiwed articles about differences in gender behavior. Show me one that says that women are hypergamous, hyperemotional, and Machiavellian by nature because they evolved under circumstances where men wandered freely spreading their seed to all and sundry while women tried desperately to find a strong willful alpha male to impregnate them with his superior genes and then cuckold an oblivious beta male to provide them with imagined prehistoric child support payments… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 07:28 AM |
| 1 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategyI agree with you, actually. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 07:26 AM |
| 2 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategySigh. I really wanted a reasoned debate and discussion of the essay. And then he had to go and compare the author of the essay to a creationist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 06:54 AM |
| 0 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategyWell, heterosexuality is certainly the best way to produce offspring, so of course it is perpetuated. But homosexuality occurs in at least 1500 animal species actually, including bonobos, an extremely close relative to humans. Bonobos are promiscuously bisexual and resolve any tension, between and within sexes, with sexual relations. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 06:52 AM |
| 1 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategyThis article has a lot of information. What specific point are you making? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 06:39 AM |
| 6 | A really interesting (but long) high effort essay analysis of Red Pill Theory and strategyIt's amazing how how similar white supremacists and Red Pillers sound when using evolutionary biology to justify one group of humans being superior to another. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/14 06:21 AM |
| 3 | Studies for Percentage of Sexuality Active Men vs WomenOh, please elaborate on how I'm pathetic. I'd love to hear it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/02/14 06:08 AM |
| 4 | Studies for Percentage of Sexuality Active Men vs WomenAllright. I'll answer your goddamn question. I thought it was rhetorical. in your every day life, do you think 80 of everyone you've met has fucked someone in the last 4 weeks? I'm in college, so I don't actually fall into the 25-45 age range where roughly 20% reported not having sex in the last month, which includes many married people. To answer your question, though... About half the people I meet are in a relationship. So at least 50% have fucked somebody in the last 4 weeks. I would guess t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/02/14 02:20 AM |
| 2 | Studies for Percentage of Sexuality Active Men vs WomenFirst of all, My workplace/school is not a representative sample size for adults in general. This study included a sample of adults, many of them married or in relationships, which is representative of the general population. Second: More sensitive questions are reserved for a self-completed questionnaire. So, no, they didn't tell about sexuality face-to-face. No one had to admit they were a virgin or slut to another person. And where is your evidence that 80% of women chase 20% of men? No one o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/02/14 12:42 AM |
| 3 | Studies for Percentage of Sexuality Active Men vs WomenDid you actually look at the graph? In age ranges 16-24, an age I think people are most likely to lie to a random surveyor because they're insecure, a higher percentage of males reported NOT having sex in the past month than females reported. It doesn't seem as though males are swelling their numbers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/14 04:46 PM |
| 9 | Studies for Percentage of Sexuality Active Men vs WomenIf you want sexual partner counts for men and women in their lifetime and partner counts for just the past year, read here. It's an analysis of a study done by the CDC in 2007. (It links to the actual study, too. In the actual study, the results we want are on pages 10 and 12.) To summarize, men have a much higher median lifetime partner count than women. Also, last year, in only ages 20-29, 81% of women had either one or zero sexual partners, while 69% of men had one or zero sexual partners. So… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/14 08:22 AM |
| 9 | Studies for Percentage of Sexuality Active Men vs WomenThe National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles asks 15,000 British adults about their sexual experiences through face-to-face interviews. But some more sensitive questions are reserved for a self-completed questionnaire. I guess 15,000 British adults are bullcrap. My bad. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/14 07:55 AM |
| 5 | Studies for Percentage of Sexuality Active Men vs WomenThis study shows that roughly only 20% of both men and women aged 25-45 have NOT had sex in the last month. 80/20? Looks more like 80/80. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/02/14 06:06 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter