TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StreamLined256 Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by StreamLined256 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I agree unfortunately I also believe it's too late to do anything about it. People hear just want to be blindly angry, they don't want to have measured or effective arguments or make any effective change. It's hardly any different than the common feminist acts just a big echo chamber about how much the other side sucks. And most feminists do suck which is why so many acting just like them should be more of an issue. Bringing up any issue with how the sub approaches these issues will be bogged do…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 01:20 PM
2

So the celebration of this fight, with terms like "equal rights mean equal fights" or "Equal rights! Knock her teeth out!" Is good thing because society doesn't like the idea of a woman being punished? I don't disagree with the statement that society doesn't punish women as harshly or as much as men, however, if you think that justifies these reactions, it is in any way supports men's rights to act like these comments have, or don't understand how this mindset and reaction is counter-intuitive t…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 03:06 PM
1

Slamming implies a punch-like motion with an open hand to me and I fail to see how he would knock her out with a slap, but I digress as that, again isn't the point. Edit: Also your temple is the area on the front sides of your head. My comment was mainly against this subs, and to a lesser extent the boy's, celebration of the violence as some sort of win for men's rights. The fight itself is a separate issue but the celebration of it is blatant glorification and hypocrisy and is what I was critic…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:35 PM
1

"they will finally have what they freaking deserve" So it is about getting even. I don't know what to say because it seems like you're arguing something I didn't say. I was criticizing the boy's celebration of his actions in the screencap (assuming it was real which it might not have been) and this subs reaction to the screencap and it's a blatant celebration of a violent confrontation and how that is both hypocritical and accomplishes nothing to further equality. I clearly said "Moments like th…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:27 PM
1

And you thought "slammed my palm into her face and knocked her the **** out" meant he slapped her? Edit: Also doesn't change it not having anything to do with what I said. I never once defended the female's action in this story. My comment was clearly mainly against the comments.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:04 PM
0

This seems like a very defeatist mindset, the responses you stated as not working are what would lead to a better situation in society, they have little effect now or on an individual level but as more people do them they accumulate, this is how social movements work, not "eye for an eye". Violent retaliation accomplishes nothing other than a vague sense of self-satisfaction.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:02 PM
0

What are you even talking about? That has nothing even remotely to do with what I said. No one got punched in the balls or got slapped in the screencap so your either made up some hyperbolic nonsense to argue something I didn't say, or you don't even know the story that's being commented on.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 01:56 PM
-5

It was retaliation, but either way that's not the point. Moments like this should be treated with a mindset of, " it's unfortunate that the situation escalated to that level" not "equal rights mean equal fights" or "They got what was coming to them". It paints our whole movement as a bunch of quick to violent assholes who are waiting for a chance to get into a fight or get revenge. We're supposed to be working toward a better more equal future instead we're celebrating a violent confrontation li…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 01:30 PM
-15

This is ridiculous, this sub has become exactly the cesspool that people claim it has because of its complete inability to call out bullshit like this in its own group. This isn't a call for equality, This is the same childish, hypocritical, nonsense that we call feminists out for every day, but when it's in our own group, suddenly it's fine, and from 4chan of all places. This is why equality will never happen, not because of shitty feminist politics, willful ignorance of their biases, or others…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 12:38 PM
0

Based on what statistics? That's .001 of people on that sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 07:11 AM
6

That poll has less than 300 people in an over 300k sub, it suggests literally nothing. Trying to make a point with such weak data hurts your point more than it helps. Personally, I think that r/mensrights tends to be more aggressive, and tend to find the discussion here to be more productive, though that could be due to the size differences and have had one or two personal discussions with people that seemed more to the "right" than I generally see in other discussions, not that that matters as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 02:58 AM
4

Sad to hear that raisedbynarcissists has such a large contingent of them. I generally consider that to be a pretty good support sub.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:32 PM
-6

I agree with what you're saying even the part about getting angry as people's apathy on these subject is a serious problem. However, is acting "in tune with everything you read about men in women's subs" Really the best way to fight against it? Passion is great, but it needs to be used with measured arguments, as this kind of lashing out is exactly what they want. Again I agree with the issues you're presenting but, how can we expect to fight them if we act exactly how they want us to, like them…
/r/MensRights24/04/21 12:25 AM
2

I don't really see how that follows but as this is basically just a repeat of your first response, and I already made a clear statement on that, I guess there's nothing else to add.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 11:57 PM
-2

Okay? I agree, but I don't really see what that has to do with my response. Edit: By agree I mean your claim that this sub is large, international, etc... not your claim on tone policing.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 11:34 PM
-16

If by "tone policing" you mean pointing out how a tone could have a negative effect on the message that's trying to be portrayed or criticizing how an overly combative attitude only serves to feed the issues rather than fix them, then I disagree, I think it is necessary. I'd also like to point out that this use of the term "Tone Policing" seems to be a pretty blatant deflection of criticism, I expect this kind of deflection from Radfems and am disappointed to see its growing use in circles I tho…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 11:27 PM
-36

While your perseverance and accomplishments are commendable and indeed should be something to be proud of, I feel the need to point out that the way this post does come off as very needlessly aggressive and what I'd expect from the type of person this Sub is generally against. I don't really know why'd you taunt trolls to repost something and act in a way that very much feeds into the narrative that they push. You do classify this as a rant, so I'm going to assume that this is a reaction to some…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:25 PM
2

I disagree, possibly mainly because I don't think that is the common notion at all, nearly the opposite actually. One of the common responses I've heard when talking about men's issues is that their mostly men's fault. So I think blaming men for these issues is actually a much more common notion which is partially what makes the response seem like it's coming from a place of defensiveness rather than to clear the air.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 04:15 AM
1

It also speaks to some mens need to defend women despite them not needing it, which considering the responder states themselves they were raised with ideals like "always pay, expect to make sacrifices, and expect to put women and children first" seems to be whats going on here. He's trying to defend women from a non-existant attack due to sexist, but positive seeming values he was raised with.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 04:09 AM
4

Technically they used the term " a lot" but the issue is what it's in response to, did the original comment ever once blame women for being responsible for the examples? It compared women and men but it never said "woman are responsible for these issues" but this person felt the need to respond with how "a lot of what men suffer today is because of other men." It's similar to when a person talks about their sex's issues and then another person jumps in, in a defensive state, saying "my sex has i…
/r/MensRights24/02/21 03:59 AM
4

Except that the example you gave gives non of that nuance. Your a taking response to a statement that was, to paraphrase, "US society is sexist against men" that says to paraphrase again "That's men's fault", essentially steering the responsibility away from woman and toward men when the original post blatantly was talking about all of society, ie men and woman. So "what I'm on about" is that isn't an example of a nuanced discussion but the exact sexism that the post was talking about.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 03:42 AM
4

You consider a comment that tries to shift the blame toward men and another agreeing with it to be good points?
/r/MensRights24/02/21 03:20 AM
6

You should consider seeking some professional help, bottling up you emotions like that is very unhealthy. Also make it clear to the people in your life that you are having these isues and if they continue to tell you suck it up consider removing them from your life or at least distancing yourself from them.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:58 AM
7

Again, How is expecting the same treatment for both genders biased? Unless you're saying that an all-male program is also completely okay? Excluding a gender from a program is unfair, someone trying to exclude a gender from a program or promote gender segregation would be acting purely on emotion and bias, not the people voicing a want for inclusion and an even playing field.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 10:09 PM
32

What do you mean objectively? The "if it was switched" mentality is the most objective one, if something is sexist for one gender it is for the other. Making a female only program is sexism plane and simple. If it was a male only program most people, feminist and me alike, would point it out and have a problem with it therefore the same should apply to females, how is that not objective?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter