TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Street_Conflict_9008 Archive

View 11 posts and 695 comments by Street_Conflict_9008 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

University trying to maintain its relevance in the underlying class war. Calling the blue collar guys uneducated? Lol This speaks of desperation for relevance! Many so called educated women want a man good with his hands.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 02:29 AM
1

Stuff like this is a good example, to many people here have a pessimistic mindset.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 08:44 PM
2

The focus should only be on males, not females in the research. Then with the research work out what the main cause was. Is the main cause different for age groups? Refocus the underlying message of a helpline and help groups. Also focus targeted messaging for different age groups as well. Some may even have government policy impact. Even improved targeted health and well being guidelines as well. It will not fix the issues, but will help reduce the lethality in many cases.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 08:40 PM
4

It wont work like that. The education inflation and debt becoming a gender expectation issue will crash birth rates due to stress.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 08:19 PM
6

Only if universities were not a debt trap!
/r/MensRights28/07/26 08:08 PM
16

Population decline and massive debt, good luck trying to promote that to men. Lol
/r/MensRights28/07/26 05:50 AM
7

Was it venting, or a more re-occurring issue? If venting it will get manipulated, if it is a re-occuring issue a pattern of behaviour should start to occur and be recorded. Dont let it slide, but start making a record. Follow reporting procedures.
/r/MensRights24/07/26 05:51 PM
1

The proposal of men falling behind and becoming less smart was the idea from Dr Farrell. While he did provide some insights, and it was seductive but a fallacy on that point. Feminism is at a cross roads, if they push university they undermine equality in blue collar, if they push blue collar, they will undermine attendance at university.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 08:58 AM
2

It is scripted, the lighting, and stage etc, lack of area off the initial stage, camera angles and more.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 07:28 PM
17

Seems like it is from some Japanese porn video.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:36 AM
4

Low self esteem and a lack of setting and maintaining boundries. The relationship is toxic.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:10 PM
1

De facto can be recoginsed depending on the country.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 11:16 AM
5

If the focus is based on various financial metrics and a lack of trust, and independance, then it is not worth it. If the is a focus on mutual dependance, by both parties and companionship over the longer term, then this does also imply there is trust. This creates a stable foundation. In this case it is worth it. Things to look at is trust, character, some common interests. These should be some of the metrics used.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 08:30 PM
2

Post a topic of interest to you, and we can discuss it. Provide your point of view, even from different perspectives there will be common ground!
/r/MensRights05/07/26 03:37 PM
2

If I am not going to help a male victim in an abusive relationship, why should I help a female victim in an abusive relationship?
/r/MensRights04/07/26 09:32 PM
0

Provide better structure, stating what you be discussing and the basic points in the intro. The sections can be better defined as well. You have a basic conculsion, the relationship aspect is spot on! There should of been a bit of a mention in the intro about the impact on relationship dynamic in the conclusion. The economic argument also has many other foundational weaknesses as well. The logic being a fallacy.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 08:53 PM
7

You are providing fringe with to much credit, and making the fringe appear bigger and more important than what it is. Yes there is polarisation. This is nothing more than a reframing of shallow materialism, and a lack of actual depth.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 08:24 PM
8

This opens the door to another topic, loneliness in a relationship. You can have a companion in life, but still have various forms of intimacy and connection neglected. Having a companion later in life is very important, as you are able to help look after each other.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 08:05 PM
10

Having talked with a number of emotional damaged men online, people who identify as incels. There tends to be a common thread they were hurt, desire connection and intimacy to the point they are fixated it becomes a vice and then create barriers. They had created an unhealthy reinforcement mechanism. When trying to talk about pets, as a dog person you can get most of the emotional needs and connection. You develop a sense of responsibility to care for others that are more vulnerable. I had talke…
/r/MensRights04/07/26 07:52 PM
2

Will say there is a mixed bag, but I dislike the litmus test used. I aint that smart, but was put in the role of logistics for a bit, you get the vibe and responses become 2nd nature when discussing the job from a logistics point of view. They put you in a different role, you add other skills, on top making processing information quicker and easier. You become more operationally aware. In the next few years, will have to shift to white collar, or just drive trucks or something, my body is starti…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 07:02 AM
3

Married over 20yrs, 2 kids, work in the trades. I do push back against a number of the university lead arguments, as they focus on over reach in society. If you take up a trade, you are less smart than someone with a degree. This is class warfare, universities and government seek to profit from it, while undermining the trades. I am not sure why the message has resonated so deeply.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 05:26 PM
4

Men and women have privileges in different areas. When it comes to programs for assistance, women definately have the advantage in this realm. Support structures are to the advantage. Also women who do apprenticeships have a much higher take home pay compared to their male counterparts that are apprentices. This was to help promote getting more women into apprenticeships. Charisma can be a big factor, those who have it, tend to have better social status.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:49 AM
6

The flaw is that survival isnt an issue. If population decline does go faster than expected, the thought experiment will really shift the paradim on gender importance. Feminism will backfire at that point!
/r/MensRights27/06/26 11:14 PM
22

In a work environment, I am more cautious with what I say with men or women. I can become more unfiltered with those I trust though. I have worked with both vindictive men and women, so cards are usually close to my chest, but always leave a couple of areas exposed as well. Never leaving my professional areas exposed at all.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:53 PM
4

Document everything is the other bit of advice. You will need it, and it is going to be a rough ride. Good luck!
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:38 PM
4

Make sure you get legal advice moving forward, they might tell you not to say anything to your parents. Risk management! You will need to get your parents on side, and ensure legal paperwork backs you up. Legal advice!
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:34 PM
10

They are looking to isolate and bully you. Strengthen the bond with your parents, and inform them the jewelery was stolen. And believe one of your wifes relatitves have stolen it. Do a police report about jewels being stolen. Also get an attorney to help guide you on this journey. His advice on reporting the jewels might be different to mine.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:24 PM
19

Children are the future, and it was about protecting the future!
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:04 PM
1

This has raised a very important point of discussion for Mens Rights. Trying to balance the survival of a nation vs the equality of freedom of choice.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 07:27 PM
1

The Ukraine/Russia war has made many European countries support the idea due to survival of the nation is at stake.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 07:22 PM
2

Unfortunately, people will need to mature sooner or later, and denying them the ability to develop maturity or making excuses for immaturity will not be helpful. Linking biases to reading material is actually harmful IMO.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 09:01 AM
3

I personally like the Cliff Hardy series, Tex Murphy, and Biggles. Later on I enjoyed the Sugawara Akitada series. Who knows, maybe they enjoy comics or other forms of reading material.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:36 AM
1

It seems like you want to step down from the gender war trap and seek companionship. That is a good thing. The character of a partner is important. Gender is not monolithic. This is the best starting point of mindset to have. There are issues of a mans purpose within society. This is a more complex issue.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 07:38 PM
2

India and Nepal relationship got tested in 2022 within 6 month of Russia invading Ukraine. India had said that it might end the military arrangement between the 2 countries due to miliary personel going to fight on Russias side for higher wages. Look for news reports about it. It might not of been of interest to the US, maybe Times of India or someyhing may have an article dating back then about it.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 06:24 PM
4

This was first 6 - 12 months of the conflict, and then many governments had cracked down on it since then.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 01:24 PM
115

So it was reckless of the father to keep filming while the daughter was in harms way? How would you have evidence if it didnt get recorded? So the husband was in the wrong for recording?
/r/MensRights25/06/26 07:05 PM
-4

The issue is feminism does have focus, creates a narrative and ensures social resonance. For men, it is a catch 22 in a way. To get resonance, you need to disable or redifne resiliance against adversity. This is a masculine trait. Becareful not to get drawn into Russian information war. I know you are smart enough to know the biology of survival, and the risks. And the reason political systems has been shaped in the way it has.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:58 PM
-5

Gun violence and murder?
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:36 PM
-6

Feminism argues about it in a domestic setting, while your stats argue on a general basis. The general basis can provide a nice overview, it does not narrow the view to be helpful.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:35 PM
2

I am not saying good or bad here. If the assumption the adult male wasnt the father, then reporting based on a potential child molestation is appropriate. As a father who has a daughter, if she was with me, I would take her into the mens toilets with me. At about 5-6 she wanted to go by herself, and went into the womens toilets. Only time i went into the womens toilets were when my kids were babies, and that was to use the baby change tables.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 10:35 AM
3

Overall I would say it isnt hard at all. If you want a boiled down version of being a man from my perspective you need to be firm but fair, and resilient. These are probably the 2 most important character traits to have. Others may have a different view on character traits. Others maybe deem materialism, or different forms of fear as being more important. This will make being a man harder.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 05:07 PM
1

Mutual support is an investment, where as if it doesnt benefit me then it is of conveniance. These should be fairly easy to distinquish if you are a modest person with a modest lifestyle. You want the focus not to be about possessions, but you as a person. Always say before hand that on dates you only "Go Dutch". Each person pays their own way, this reduces expectations, and helps as a first stage filter for character. Also you are setting the standard of expectation as well.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:49 AM
2

Definately agree it is silly. I also agree the wage gap argument is silly. The issue in the discussion that is important is legacy. Eg. & sons will not go multiple generations, a persons name can. In that way legacy can be important over time.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 08:05 PM
2

Charisma has always been more important. That is an intangible, whereas a paycheck is tangible. Character is even more intangable.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 05:15 AM
4

Maybe, but foundations of a relationship would be similar. Nothing in what was said does focus on foundations at all. It is pretty much shallow talking points without substance.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:02 PM
6

It is better to seek a variety of perspectives, rather than focus on confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 08:57 PM
6

Relationships will have alot of different emotions, many you may not even have experienced. We all make choices, we all have principles. Emotions and character are different things,. Past relationships ends up being a non issue when mutual support was my focus. Supporting each other during the tough times. This creates trust. I would suggest think about what you actually want from a relationship in the long term. A life long companion is different from a lover. The character and emotional traits…
/r/MensRights12/06/26 08:47 PM
6

Relationships take time to develop! If you focus to much on their past relationships, you end up tapping into many negative emotions, and that is unhealthy. Jealousy and the feeling how do I compare is a very ugly beast. I had started to explore that option, and didnt like it, as it would end up destorying the potental relationship.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 08:32 PM
8

I got married when I had nothing and was recovering from an addiction. We now live comfortabily together. We built a life together. We still argue and the like, it isnt perfect, but I know I have someone in my corner in the bad times, and that is important. The issue you are having is character related. My philosophy is relationships are based on mutual support. In the end you might be successful in some areas, but you havent learnt about yourself as a person and what you can offer a relationshi…
/r/MensRights12/06/26 07:55 PM
1

While not misandric in itself, it tends to work more in favour of women based on older concepts of behaviour. If children are involved, and it will probably get messy, it is easier for a woman to get an ADVO compared to a man.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:33 PM
1

Just joke with it. Ask "If I am such a creep, why are you coming over to talk to me?" Well, it will frustrate her. If she gets a negative emotion, say that is cute and laugh it off.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:42 AM
6

It highlights that in most cases it is the male that is violent. It goes through the civil court system. ADVO does not require a court order, just a feeling that something might happen. As such it comes into effect once created, and is used in family courts. It can be used to deprive a parent visitation rights to see their child. There are support services for women, but not for men.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:37 AM
1

Take her husband out for a few beers. If she asks, it is secret mens business. A few beers and some pool. Regardless, if she tries to provide to much unwanted advice into your life. Reply with something like "Thanks mum for the advice, I will take it into consideration". You are subtly telling her where you are drawing the lines.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 08:31 AM
3

Well once middle aged women become net benefactors rather than net beneficiaries, it will be interesting to see. Stuff like what you are suggesting is small potatoes. I wouldnt read to much into the numbers, it can mean that more women are changing jobs and there is a higher turn over of females employed. I can mean there is also less male staff turnover.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 07:43 AM
3

I guess they are not happy with the low birth rate, and want to push it lower.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 08:50 PM
1

This feels like a rant, rather than a topic of discussion.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 09:07 AM
1

It is expected some kids will have high energy levels in kindergarten. That is not considered an issue. Causing trouble like bullying, stealing etc is an issue.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 09:03 AM
1

Never been to uni, so I wouldnt know based on field representation. I would argue trades tend to be better usually, this is you are fully qualified and no debts getting your qualifications. It is easier to have or get a job. The debts at uni can rack up, and if you plan to become a parent, the women will still end up with debt from studies in most cases. The longer study period for women is actually a seductive trap, keeps them out of the work force for longer, and a shorter period in the work f…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 07:58 PM
3

Wait till you are parents. A simple dynamic when married with kids. Father tells the kids to respect their mother, if they are being disrespectful. The father also sets the tone on what respect and authority is. The mother then demonstrates what respect is. If the mother then openly undermines the father, the father pulls the support and disengage. The loss of support for the mother means the kids also lose respect for the mother, and then stop listening to her. Once unity is shown and not getti…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 07:33 PM
9

I have tried to open up the discussion in good faith, but rather than actually discuss topics it is treated as an attack. There are many here in mens rights that will focus on equality rather than discuss equity. You were trying to frame equity as equality.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:28 PM
-6

Women live longer, so they are a more important voter block!
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:21 PM
12

You realise, feminism has called lowering the retirement age of men compared to women sexist, and a impossing patriachal privilege to get women to work longer than men. They also say women have also more health issues in later life compared to men. The economic social input will shift. It is saying women are less reliable in an economic sense to society.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:19 PM
49

Just take it out of your sick leave!
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:01 AM
2

I can see how it can be used in a comical sense, but in rl, it will shut down the partnership aspect and errode goodwill.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 06:25 AM
9

Never heard that. As a father, if baby was crying at night either needing a nappy change or a feed. It was me who would do that, if the baby needed a feed, would bring baby to mum. It was about reducing chemicals related to stress to go into mums milk. As a right to demand priority, that is shallow. You need to know why your doing something.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 05:41 AM
35

That is a discription of a war crime. The Isreali leadership is actively engaging in and condoning war crimes to be commited.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 07:55 PM
5

Many men here say all modern women are ..... So in many ways it is similar, but they are using an adjective as well.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 08:50 PM
9

Women and men are not monolithic! You need to spemd less time on social media and more time in the real world doing an activity or 2.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 08:21 PM
1

The big issue is also dealing with a long term negative image of men in teaching that goes back to the 80s. We need to have open discussions about that. This takes time and oxygen from other issues. An open discussion for long enough will open doors, and weaken the negative image.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 08:37 AM
1

What do you mean by underacheiving? The % of male/female ratio at university? BTW IQ and being intellectual isnt the focus in most parts of society, hence that is not the primary currency in most areas. What tends to be important is a persons character. Where is the boys father to help teacher him character? Sadly it seems you have learnt from books, not the school of hard knocks!
/r/MensRights21/05/26 08:21 AM
2

While it is important to point out sexually abusive behaviour from female teachers, there is not much being done to improve the image of male teachers. In the 80's and 90s there was a strong focus to get rid of sexually abusive male teachers from the profession. Yet the stigma of primary school male teachers are pedos still remains. More needs to be done to change that image.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:56 AM
1

Life is about experiencing a range of emotions good and bad!
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:47 AM
0

If you touch them, you pay for them. It isnt try before you buy! Lol
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:40 AM
3

That is a very condesending tone you are using just now! If you are or were a feminist, maybe you dont realise it. In some areas i think feminism will focus on shutting down discussion, discord in using macro arguements while talking about micro issues, and others. Mens rights should focus on issues like this! Teaching is one where the decline in men in primary and early education was caused by focusing to remove male sexual abusers in the 80s. The issue here is to improve the image of men in ea…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:40 PM
1

I would rather be an Omega Man, the last man standing.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 09:27 AM
-6

A university educated person make simple grammatical and spelling errors is a sign.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 09:26 AM
1

So long as i am not drawn into a lawsuit i dont care
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:48 AM
4

It will just be part of social decline, after the crash there will be a renewal. The crash will include, financial, population and food.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:23 AM
3

I am blue collar, let your passion guide you! He will develop character, setbacks will help him grow, passion will provide the drive through the difficult time. Men dont develop character with everything given to them. It is developed through perseverence, and overcoming difficulties.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 07:57 AM
1

I hardly use things like fb etc. If i am looking for a new powertool, and after info on that, almost all my ads are on the tools I am looking for. It is nothing more than trying to suck you into a feedback loop. At one time i was tossing around the idea of getting a nail gun, and for 2 months after I was still getting nail gun ads. Lol For these companies, it is just about revenue! Chase the clickbait, you will join the feedback echo chamber.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:29 AM
1

Most relationships are not easy. Will both of you have each others back in the hard times? (Support each other) Understand how you each handle conflict, and can accept that method. (How you both problem solve) Is long term companionship viable with each others personalities? (Adaptability) Each person has their own views!
/r/MensRights12/05/26 08:18 PM
1

You can get into a trade as an appentice, earning a pittance. After you finish, and qualified you have skills an income and not debt from your education. The issue is a social one you have highlighted, one born from complacency.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 07:45 PM
1

The trap that feminists had created is by creating trash degrees at university. Eg womens studies. Ending such courses will destroy the primary foundation the movement has established, but will make sure it ends the trap. To keep itself relevant it needs the trap itself to promote trash degrees. Universities will argue that the trash degrees are also needed as it will then justify their bloated administration. Removing such degrees will harm their revenue. The argument your focused on is possibl…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 07:40 PM
2

Blue collar working in a small company. What is a promotion? Promotions are for big business and government!
/r/MensRights10/05/26 06:49 AM
2

I dont think oppression is the right word, just some social and legal mechanisms have shifted a bit futher in one direction then needed to go. The question feels like a victim competition between men vs women. I do not believe in either. Making this a gender war issue is counter productive to social cohesion. This concept for this question does create a perpetual victimhood argument. They are equally the same, politically and socially, misandry is considered less negatively. There is no such thi…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 10:53 AM
2

ON is nothing more than a litmus test party, it doesnt have any real policies, and is in cahoots with various big businesses. It has used shock value as a form of marketing. So I wouldnt say they are pro-male.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 07:23 AM
6

Nope. Paranoia is a personal prison you inflict on yourself.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 07:17 AM
0

The gay jap is actually an opening to defuse the situation by using humour. It can even be used as a mocking retort. If it is treated literally, is can be seen as offensive. Guys can use gay jabs with each other on the worksite as a blue collar. It can be seen as normal in some situations. It doesnt mean the guys are gay. Women using the gay thing comes down tone. If used in venomous type of way, mock her with gay retort of her being jealous. Any attempt to control and undermine will be weakened…
/r/MensRights03/05/26 09:45 AM
-16

That is shallow arguments. If that is her perspective, it is shallow. If you are hurt by the argument, you are placing to much importance on shallow arguments. What it tells me about the guys who fall for it is they lack character. Within that argument is a loss of self respect. Know why you want to have a relationship!
/r/MensRights03/05/26 09:25 AM
1

It is not the type of people, but the types of issues. Most of the stuff talked about on here is what i would call venting with no core focus. Important issues would be focused on health (and well being), laws in the legal system, aspects of education primarilly in the curriculum and other things. There also needs to be a reframing of masculinity, some of the foundational work can be done within MRA but not all of it.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 08:40 AM
1

Simple solution is "Go Dutch", let the other person know that you pay your own way!
/r/MensRights03/05/26 08:26 AM
-1

Many people have asked if i am on the spectrum, i dont know and dont want to know. Simple as that. I will be blunt with this "LIFE IS NOT MENT TO BE EASY". Being on the spectrum is nothing more than having an excuse to play the victim card. It seems you have never learnt what respect is. It is earned, not given. It seems you are using a lens of it being given. In highschool I was a placid and meek kid. I did get the same insults and more. I did also get involved in fight if a hardline was crosse…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 09:21 PM
1

First thing is you dont really know yourself or what you want. You are chasing an idea. You might want to do a bit of soul searching to understand yourself better, to know what you can offer a relationship, and what you also need from a relationship. Sweet doesnt cut it when you are looking for character traits. Create a list of things you can offer in a relationship, and a list of things you need from a relationship. However long the list is for each, cut it down to the top 5. Hint, the more ma…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 07:50 PM
4

I would of thought that it would be a comedy show. Why didnt you help the girl that fell and hurt herself? She is strong and independant, any help would be using my male privilege to undermine her strength and independance. Feminism has given men a great excuse to be lazy and not take responsibility.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 08:48 PM
1

You are getting attacked by her friends and family. This is easy to resolve to a degree. Talk with your wife about the importance of sticking together and supporting each other. You both have stress from different direction. Venting the stress to some of her friends and family will create more pressure on the relationship. Venting to people about your stress does cause addition pressure on me. I get attacked in different ways. If we can work together and have each others backs, and support each …
/r/MensRights30/04/26 07:48 AM
2

One of the big issues Mens Rights should focus on is trying to fix the damage caused back in the 80's and 90's facing fatherhood and males in early childhood education. This was caused by trying to remove child sex abuse within society. While important did create a social void in the family structure. Mens Rights can look at improving to social image of males as fathers, educators and more. Demonising women will not elevate the image of males in society, it only looks at trying to lower the imag…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 03:41 AM
3

It is decentering mens rights and focusing the discussion on feminism. If there are problems is a certain section and your first response is it is caused by feminism. It is now derailment. I dont support feminism and also highly critical of it in many ways. It has had both good and bad points.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:21 PM
-5

You have actually highlighted a very important aspect of the whole topic, "lack of social awareness". Coming in with a preconcived notion rather than adapting to and negociating the social dynamics. If the focus is about control and being right, and to validate your opinions, allow you to control a conversation, AI is good. If you then use that as a template for the rest of society, you will be at a massive disadvantage due to a poor understanding of social dynamics. The use of AI as a substitut…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 04:21 PM
1

In most societies, there just over half the population is female, that makes females the majority and makes males the minority.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:14 PM
3

I think many guys here are only aware of some basic stats talked about by podcasters. Back in the 80's and 90's, there was a strong focus on finding and prosecuting adult males for child sex offenses. In many ways it did sow a level of distrust at a social level for men to be fathers, teachers of young kids etc. Things like this is to help heal the wounds of the past, and help prevent destructive cycles from repeating themselves.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:09 PM
2

The title is very concerning. The "control" part is a red flag. Firstly rejection is apart of life. Most people go through rejection, and learn emotional regulation. Not learning to deal with rejection will also have a range of side effects that can affect aspects of social cohesion, accept decisions you dont agree with among other things. Loneliness as you have suggested, is actually a different subject matter not related to the title.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 10:52 AM
1

The issue is the age gap more than anything. A person could also ask if the more mature person 60, groomed the significantly younger person until they turned 18, then decided to date them legally. This is considered predatory behaviour. The next issue is the grandparent/grandchild look from the outside. Not saying this cant work, there are more social pressures involved.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 08:23 PM
47

A very draconian mindset. Wanting to make everyone suffer because you have suffered. He has been hurt, and needs help. It does sound like mental breakdown territory, and requires a level of sympathy. The actions for pursuing the draconian rules are to be condemed on human rights grounds.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 09:18 PM
17

Over all, IVF tends to be an expensive option for a woman to get pregnant and have a child. This is usually a last resort option. It is not an economic option even for most couples to pursue. To try and indirectly say IVF is cheap and easily accessible is non sense. If you have have the economic resources to afford IVF, chances are you have the economic resources to raise the child.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:34 PM
1

Always say before going on a date "we will go Dutch". This means we each pay our own way and there are no expectations at the end. She has hands, she can open the door herself.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 09:17 AM
2

Small businesses will still require staff. While the focus on automation is for businesses that have scale. That automation of scale provides effiency. The example of a vet, allows the vet to focus on the job of looking after the animals, while the admin staff handle bookings, payments etc. If the admin staff were replaced by automation, then the vet also increases the scope of responsibility for their role. This increase in responsibility also reduces any buffers as well.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 07:58 PM
6

If your talking on the entry level areas of cyber security that is true. The coding aspects and ability to fix errors will still need humans. Some parts of the infrastructure will get automated, but not all. Admin in big companies can get reduced, 2 people working as admin for a vet will not get replaced by automation. The admin for vets still need a human face and able to handle customer enquires etc.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 07:24 PM
2

Who really cares, people like to show off things they like. Eg an interest or activity. If she is holding up a bunch of magnolias, maybe she like magnolias. They might also think it adds to the cute factor.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 07:07 PM
11

Relationship have their ups and downs. Trust me you dodged a bullet. They showed their true colours. There is no mutual support with that attitude they have! Your friends in primary school calling you a girl for not being able to keep up with them is friendly goading. You then use that to push yourself to keep up. Outside a friend group it is a slur on character. Edit: you know your good friends are if you are vulnerable, and they show empathy. They will still goad you as well, they know the dif…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 05:18 AM
1

Never been to uni, never diagnosed, but people have asked if i am on the spectrum. I dont know and dont want to know. This is not a mens rights issue, you are asking for dating and relationship advice. I am married 20 years, and have kids. Basic things are, know yourself and what you can offer, know what you want from a partner. Character is very important!
/r/MensRights06/04/26 07:57 PM
2

Having a gf and getting married are different things. Dating is about finding out about the person, their character etc. Dating does not always lead to marriage. There is also different types of serious relationships as well.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 01:37 AM
4

Most of the people I know are in long term relationships! Yes, they are not perfect, and will have ups and downs. Relationships are a partnership, going through good and bad together. You will also find that having both parents is more helpful. Think of good cop, bad cop. As a father, i am the one that takes on the hate in difficult situations, when the mother plays the loving and supportive role. The kids also see we also support each other. The kids get that balance. I am not the best father, …
/r/MensRights08/12/25 06:16 PM
-2

Damn, buying penthouse and playboy as a teenager would make me more susepitable to getting abused? Damn, if only I had realised. Guess I just got lucky, and didnt have sex for the first time till my early 20's. A naked woman in front of my eyes, now I am asking to get sexually abused. It was a fantasy, the boy had wet dreams, is what was inferred. He saw a topless woman, in a dream was inferred. Was she really topless, or it she have clothing covering her top half at the front, and implied she w…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 09:15 AM
1

Are you able to tell the difference between a fantasy vs sexual assault? At the moment you are trying to say they are the same thing.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 01:21 AM
8

He hit puberty, and was dreaming and having fantasies. What is the big deal?
/r/MensRights27/11/25 08:04 PM
1

I did, while gender aspect is an important point of discussion. The age aspect is dangerous, as it would be difficult to argue against statutory rape/sexual assault, claiming the minor was the aggressor and claiming a minor was sexually assaulting you.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 07:25 PM
-6

There is the issue of age, which is a bigger concern. She is under the age of consent!
/r/MensRights21/11/25 06:32 AM
1

Been in a similar situation, just dont let it control your life. At that age she will move on very quickly to someone else. The issue is, will she hold a vendetta? It is best to provide a bit of flattery, and soften it. Have her leaving on a high note, feeling like she had accomplished something. "You are a very attractive and smart young woman, if you are still single by the time you are 18yo, I would be more than happy to date you! Would you be willing to wait till then?" Doesnt matter if she …
/r/MensRights21/11/25 01:23 AM
7

I am a centrist, that leans to the right.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 01:03 AM
1

Tictoc and youtube shouldnt be the primary source. Playful and funny tends to be a very attractive quality.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 06:57 PM
14

It is more along the lines of classism. It is about thinning out the middle class.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 11:40 AM
22

That is a very interesting perspective. I deemed it more along the lines of class, increased work place participation the easier it is to suppress wages.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:26 AM
4

Gambling has always been seen as a way to be easy money. It is therefore primarily an economic issue. It might be argued that gambling is a form of competition, and the failure to win can cause problems. Probably the best approach is to focus on moderation and suggest support services at the same time. If you, or someone you know is having issues with gambling please contact.......(organisations in your country).
/r/MensRights03/11/25 07:19 PM
1

I have had addictions. The main reason to work at that time was to support my addiction. At that time addiction was my motivation, unhealthy form of motivation. When trying to shift away from my addiction to seeking a relationship, I got a pet. A lovely dog. I started shifting my emotional investment from addiction towards my pet. Over time the responsibilty of focusing on another living being rather than myself was a big psychological shift. I would suggest focus on something that motivates you…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 07:26 PM
6

Marketing of domestic consumption was almost always focus towards a female audiance. While males worked, females were housekeepers, and they did the shopping.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 05:14 PM
3

I haven't seen the advert, if you insult the demographic users of your product, it will create a sales decline. Products fall into 2 categories, innovation or user experience. If it has neither it falls flat. The 3rd one is about controversy, getting people to talk about the product or advert, this can be both positive and negative. The positive, the name gets mentioned more hence in peoples minds. The negative, it undermines peoples views of the brand.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 07:11 AM
27

This has been around for a long time. Males worked, females were the house keepers, and the house keepers did the shopping. That is why advertising, and the consumer market is focused heavily towards women. The marketing has started to shift, but products need to shift from a 1950's housewifes perspective.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:59 AM
4

That is marketing 101, try and highlight something you are missing, and we have the solution.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:52 AM
1

A redirection of energy in healthy ways from a young age, and developing a positive attitude and discipline. I definately agree with you. This foundation and supporting structure tends to be missing or neglected in these discussions. It is also not a flashy point of view.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:43 AM
-16

How far back in media history? Look at things another way: Males are light hearted and funny Females are serious Males can laugh at themselves Females cant Females have it worse, they are not funny and cant laugh at themself. Being smart is just a consolation prize in entertainment! Edit: The 3 Stooges, Abbott and Costello, The Honeymooners, Get Smart etc are feminist media tools of male surpression?
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:00 AM
3

Trust is the foundation of support structures. Trust takes time!
/r/MensRights16/10/25 07:40 PM
2

Social structures have shifted. It was about toughening up, because the world can be dangerous and unforgiving. The flow on effects were bastardisation. It wasnt perfect, nor do I agree with the flow on effects. I am not romanticising the past, just giving it a more positive spin for social context. Boys still need ways to deal with excess energy, the occassional fight occurred, and the mentality was let them work it out. Mock fights, and ripping on each other was very coomon between friends. Ap…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 07:19 PM
3

It is the foundations of trust, and it takes time to build trust. The other aspect is purpose and being part of something bigger than you. An individual is not a team, they are part of a team. Males tend to focus on protect and provide mindset. Emotions need to be suppressed as it can mean making potentially fatal mistakes. When those emotions are shared, we need to trust they will not be weaponised. Female social dynamic is alot more fluid, and it always has been. Male social dynamics tend to b…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 06:23 PM
3

I will use generalisations here. It starts with socialisation, as males and females on average socialise differently. Males support dynamics tend to require practical things occuring while at the same time they can trust when actually being vulnerable, it will not be weaponised against them. The next part is role models and a big brother relationship. Trust within a structure, it provides guidance, accountability, fairness and responsibilty. This is roughly the way I see it in a basicly. You wil…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:52 PM
1

The issue is knowing when to stop or show restraint. A system was established, and when you are close to reaching an objective you can start putting on the breaks. The intended purpose for the infrastructure is no longer needed in education, it can be scrapped. The longer term social consequence is actually a birth rate decline. A different aspect that seems to get undermined If we look at advertising and the consumer market, it is still heavily focused towards women. This was based from the man…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 07:12 AM
2

Feminism is not egalitarianism! Feminism has focused on the protection of victimhood status for women. It will fight to protect this position. We can use equity and equality as a basis. Equity infrasture is put in place to make it easier, then once there is a big enough cohort push equality. It creates a position of privilege. The structures are not removed when the intented purpose is achieve, they continue to remain. Higher education over 60% of students are female. In former male dominated ar…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 07:50 PM
1

Victimhood is about gaining sympathy or empathy. An example of this can be victims of domestic violence. For a long time the focus on providing support services for victims was to associate it on a gender basis. Those who wanted to shift the narative to helping all victims rather than it focusing on gender based have found it futile. Male victims of domestic violence have been publicly humiliated throughout history. The moment there is an attempt to bring up males can be victims of domestic viol…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 06:31 AM
1

In a nutshell, if women are behind they push for equity, once there is a big enough cohort they push the equality argument. The principles of equity remain in place, while equality is being pushed. There is also a strong focus to protect victimhood status at all costs.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:51 PM
1

Historically women lived longer than males, in recent years that gap has increased. We are living longer. So if we are living longer and the average life expectancy of women is also increasing compared to males. Yet more money is focused on womens health to increase the life expectancy gap.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:44 PM
2

Feminism is not an egalitarian movement! Feminism claims to be egalitarian, and tries to market itself as such. In some cases it wants to replace the term egalitarian with the word feminism.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:00 PM
3

Is it the same one where it cites the mice experiments to draw his conclusion to civilisation?
/r/MensRights14/10/25 09:08 AM
9

The end game is to cripple birth rates, the only thing is they don't realise that yet!
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:33 AM
9

I will say that the markets will decide. Money doesn't discriminate, people do. Some people look at price, some ethics, some reliability etc. Ideology tends not to be a focus point for most people.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 06:52 AM
9

The argument is based on validation or I have problems, it is not about being mutually supportive. If they have to go onto using insults it also means they are also insecure and want to protect victimhood status. This does show they do not have compassion for their partner.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:17 AM
1

If we start off with the foundations for early education. Boys have higher energy levels on average. This excess energy can create a level of distraction. This can create a level of bias, of "since boys are more easily distracted......", this reinforces social norms, then can be argued that boys are not as smart as girls. If the focus is only at university, then you're not going to remove bias in the rest of the structure. That bias will make it more difficult to change at university due to the …
/r/MensRights12/10/25 07:58 PM
1

Support in what way? Feminism has many different satellites focused on a variety of different things. The premise is equality, and trying to be egalitarian. While not showing restraint once objectives are met. Using victimhood as a form of currency. We shouldn't start at the point of victimhood, but from a point of recognition.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 08:54 AM
1

It is important to do work that is both a passion and you find fulfilling. Children are the future!
/r/MensRights12/10/25 08:36 AM
1

My proposal was longer break times, eg recess go from 15 minutes to 20 minutes. Lunch could go from 30 minutes to 1hr. As a pure example. This does work with the biological issue of higher energy levels in boys. I had said some people had argued boys should start later. With a rebuttal to that it would increase the disparity, biological aspects being one. There are many other aspects that do highlight that suggestion is flawed. That point you have brought up is nothing more than an "It's an unfa…
/r/MensRights12/10/25 05:18 AM
1

I do not live in the US. There are structural and foundational issues. Dialogue is important, and to debate or discuss ideas helps lead to a better understanding of perspective. There has been large technological changes, and these have created disruptions. Rather than focus on problem solving, and discussing resolutions. Men's Rights say there is a problem and doesn't provide a vision in which to discuss possible solutions. There is a negative reinforcing loop at a social level. Why is there a …
/r/MensRights12/10/25 01:00 AM
2

STEM = Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths Yes, are different countries. The scope is more broad in the US to include the health and medical fields in the services sector.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 08:42 PM
0

Doctors and Nurses are in the CARE or HELP sector, not STEM. Women do dominate Health, Education, Legal and forgot what P stands for.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 12:19 PM
9

It could be the issue that as women have more opportunities in general and more choice. Women in general tend to be more social, and with technology it is more about the social change which benefits women alot more. Men being less social also seek connection. This gets over turned when we look at natural supply and demand. When you have more highly educated women, seeking even higher educated men, it creates a scarce resource, and that these males can become more open to casual sex. This creates…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 12:05 AM
3

No depth, and poor rationality. It only taps into a certain grievance demographic to reinforce their belief. Then profits off of that grievance.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 07:09 PM
0

Them type of stuff also provided sex advice as well!
/r/MensRights04/10/25 01:47 PM
1

Intimacy is actually subjective, and can include sex, but it is more focused on the emotional connection aspect. It is softer language. Companionship is about being there to share both the good and bad times together, and be able to support each other.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 04:37 AM
5

By her logic, she doesn't care about the person either. Status and stability here are not personal characteristics traits, but is a focus on materialism. It is what can he provide me. This is an argument of selfishness! Ask her what her definition of love is? Chances are it will be shallow. It sounds like she wants to be desired and princess treatment. Not all men want sex, alot of men want companionship and intimacy. This is a form of emotional connection, something deep, not shallow and dismis…
/r/MensRights03/10/25 06:20 PM
1

Lets step back a bit. There were periods in time when both males and females contributed equally. But in the last century, an expression did arise. "What is yours is mine, and what's mine is my own". This is what was said by women. In this period of time, if a male earned $1 for doing a job, a woman would be legally paid 80 cents for the same job. Since it is the same $ for $, each person needs to contribute equally. The real question is, what is the expectation from a relationship? My opinion i…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 01:41 PM
1

The issue is the context, as in playful, petty etc. I guess many deem the comment to focus on petty aspect rather than playful. Especially when I had kids, my wife used to say I acted very childish, eg very playful with the kids, and did it with lots of energy. Not defending it, just my interpretation. My wife says I am a great father, but I don't think that, average at best. What is better, to be playful or serious with children? With being playful, you also can teach them other social skills l…
/r/MensRights27/09/25 04:06 AM
-3

I am not defending the statement, but it could also mean boys are better at engaging with babies, to make thing more fun, like playing with them(nuturing or fatherly).
/r/MensRights25/09/25 11:22 AM
1

Women have it easier to do this type of thrills without getting caught. Men can do this stuff as well, but it is far more difficult, and it is about the excitement or risk of getting caught.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 10:54 AM
3

Feminism is not egalitarianism. Men's rights is not egalitarianism. What you are after is egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 10:40 AM
1

I passively support various aspects of men's rights. When it comes to misandry, it is either meh or pass the popcorn. Depending on mood. Then again I am egalitarian, and argued with feminists, that feminism is not an egalitarian movement. If a person can not distinguish the difference between the 2 it speaks volumes about them, and I just pity them. Why is there a need to be adversarial, when all they deserve is pity? Remember many people join causes due to pain. Have seen it to many times, and …
/r/MensRights12/09/25 10:20 AM
-5

The issue with your argument is women worked back end support roles,they even worked in intelligence as well. The UK had the infrastructure inplace to increase munition manufacturing. This was able to absorb alot of women who got recruited. Ukraine is in a war of attrition, the loss of to many women would cripple any form of recovery and weaken its ability to continue against a war of attrition. Once manufacturing starts to scale, you will see it filled with women.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:38 PM
72

It is one way to get rid of competition, it was a political move.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 09:23 PM
5

A negative spiral that is self reinforcing?
/r/MensRights10/07/25 10:06 AM
1

Lets look at it another way, females will have to do more of the dirty jobs, while the males can say i can't do that because it is against the law. Since you did the nappies and toilet training, I get to do story time. It puts more pressure on the female staff compared to the male staff. It is also an anti feminist move as well for equality. Equal pay for equal work. Enjoy less responsibility while you can.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 02:33 AM
1

I think this will end up as a court case where female early educators have to do the dirty jobs of changing nappies and toilet training etc, while male early childhood educators do more of the fun things like story time. It will reinforce a stereotype feminism has tried to break for a long time. It will also look at creating a pay argument where males are performing less duties, so they should be paid less. I think it will take pressure off male early childhood educators, and increase pressure o…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 08:33 PM
80

Feminism is not egalitarianism!
/r/MensRights08/07/25 10:01 AM
1

The argument you should attack is him calling a relationship a burden. A strong relationship or marriage is where both people compliment and support each other. In history both males and females had to work to provide for the family. If both people didn't pull their weight, the family would starve to death.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 02:29 AM
6

You shouldn't of come back. Should of sent a text message saying "I don't date cheaters"! After they tried to contact you.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:22 PM
1

The proposal was to ban male educators from doing any toilet training and a couple of other things. It is not to ban them from the industry. I do understand your perspective. Having lived in both Japan and Australia, I was also weary initially as well. Their character is an important part, if the vibe doesn't feel right I am less likely to trust the male educator in early child care and look for another place. Banning male educators from early childcare then creates more social issues. You are n…
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:00 PM
1

Those examples are not illegal, but it does raise issues of ethics. It is the ethical aspects in which you will get fired from your job for abusing your position of power. The cognitive impairment could have him at the mental capacity below the age of consent. This is a very important factor, and probably why she was put on the sex offenders registry. It was more than an ethics issue.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 04:34 PM
2

You have a good character, and you care for your students well-being!
/r/MensRights04/07/25 10:27 PM
2

I think your manager knows the reality of the situation. In early childcare, it is a greater risk for males, but at the same time it also gives children a male role model with single parent homes. It is difficult to get males into the industry, and having a male educator on the team can be difficult to keep them. I think your manager see's the value you do provide, and is focused on trying to keep you. Some of the other staff like to play games, and those games tend to lack a level of profession…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 08:02 PM
11

That is the best way to deal with that sort of baiting and manipulation tactics.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 08:45 PM
10

Just say you will only "Go Dutch" on dates, eg. each person pays their own way. Be up front about it. That way they will not be surprised. If they can't pay for their themselves, I am not interested.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 11:03 AM
4

This seems like it is expanding the scope of a GP.. Relationship questions does have ethical issues, due to privacy concerns. GPs are not psychologists. I am not sure why they should delve into relationship issues in the first place unless they are dealing with someone with a mental disorder. Going in due to a work or sports injury, and getting asked questions about personal relationships would get me thinking they lack a level of professionalism. It isn't why I went in. I went in to get help on…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:54 AM
1

Um, the more you view the stuff the more the algorithm will give you that stuff. It thinks that viewing it is what interests you, so it provides more of the same. My wife like cooking and viewing cooking videos, so most of the stuff she gets is cooking vids. Change the content that you are interested in, and the algorithm will change over time, but you will still get them over time.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 09:14 PM
2

Wages have been stagnant in Japan for over 2 decades, it is a fallout of a housing crash that occurred. What is good about this is prices remain stable and you don't need to worry about inflation. The declining birth rate is different, cost of living pressure, and the cost of raisings kids can be more difficult financially.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 12:26 PM
3

It wasn't one man one vote, it was one household one vote. If you had 100 houses in the area only 100 votes could be cast. It had shifted from a household to individual legal aged adults to vote. Yes, Feminism did have a hand in that. If you had adult children living with you, son or daughter, they might have a different opinion to the mother or father. This then can create a situation of voter fraud, so it had expanded to all people of age with the right to vote. This increased the voter base, …
/r/MensRights24/05/25 08:16 AM
1

That is why it is based on age. The law has a minimum age of consent, eg. 16yo as an example. The law assumes that by that age a person has the cognitive capacity and maturity to handle the effects of sex. Under the age they are deemed not to have the capacity or maturity, and therefore can not consent. It is an aged based law to help protect children and adolescents, to grow and develop and reduce abuse and manipulation.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 09:42 PM
0

Everything in life has risks! Married 20 years, never had a joint account, and never had shared assets. We still repay each other if we borrow things. This process was set up early in our relationship as an easy way to separate with minimal fuss(my idea). We still go Dutch on coffee dates over 90% of the time. It is better to have loved and lost than to never of loved at all.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 09:26 AM
4

Statutory rape can mean the student was a willing participant, but is a criminal act based on age.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 08:40 PM
1

Life isn't so black and white, it is made up of different shades of grey. All relationships have their issues, mine as well. I understand that divorce occurs, and people can be blindsided. I am not saying it doesn't happen, and there was one time my wife let some information slip where it could of occurred due to external factors. These things didn't occur, and it has been fine since. Over all we have both been supportive of each other.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 08:36 PM
0

Why, we are both kinda comfortable with the situation. If there is no trust, there is no relationship!
/r/MensRights14/05/25 08:57 PM
10

Call me stupid, I am married 20 years. Then again I am not that smart.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 06:49 AM
5

Each person pays their own way.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 01:05 PM
5

Just go Dutch.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 12:10 PM
2

I am not smart or rich, yet am married for 20 years. We both place alot of fidelity in our relationship. Polygamy is more for the personality of the person. Some people are open to having multiple partners or sharing, while others are not.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 10:18 AM
1

If the vibe feels right, talk about things you like to do, and she tells you what she likes. Treat it as part of the 4play. Also mention that if she feels uncomfortable, she should say so, as you might not notice subtle things she is trying to express.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 01:55 AM
4

4B is a minority echo chamber of radicals. You are giving them to much credit. In the real world, most people want a healthy baby, while some will have a preference, they will not abort based on gender usually.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 12:13 AM
-4

Would you want to live in a democracy or a dictatorship? The war is about ideology. I guess you also say "It's better to be RED than DEAD", but I say, "It's better a DEAD RED than to be RED or DEAD".
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:32 PM
1

The issue is, if your country was attacked would you want to fight and defend your way of life or give up and lose your freedoms?
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:00 PM
0

I am married and don't have friends. Married 20 years actually, with 2 children. Many of us have had difficult periods in our lives. If you meet the right person, mutual support and caring for each other is wonderful. Hmm, Financial Domination should be done with someone you really trust. You are open to alot of abuse and exploitation if you are not careful. I sense there is alot of pain, look for more constructive ways to release it. What are some things you want to achieve?
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:55 AM
3

One of the issues with your argument is you are promoting charity/duty sex as part of the theme. The other issue is how many men have built their own home that they are living in?
/r/MensRights22/03/25 05:01 PM
2

That is an interesting point that could be worth exploring. The question is why is it considered a turn off to some women?
/r/MensRights18/03/25 06:42 PM
8

Follow your heart, yes. Following your heart does not mean you can not have boundaries or ask questions.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:09 PM
11

Romeo and Juliet laws eg. No more than 2 years apart can counter the age of consent issue, if you live in an area that has it. He might of been 17 while she was 15 yo.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 05:34 PM
1

This sounds like the mother's are the primary care givers, while fathers are secondary care givers. Primary care givers are recognised by the state when it comes to social benefits. The secondary care givers is not recognised by the state for social benefits, even if the secondary care giver is a legal guardian.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 07:47 PM
1

It seems many of the comments here are saying males are mindless sex robots, and females can choose which toy to play with if they do want to play with a toy. This feeds into your last paragraph where there is a lack of personal respect, and a respect for other men. I am in agreement with OP that the numbers are similar, both genders have their unique challenges. Social norms can be a strong factor, but I think perceived characteristics a person does possess plays a role.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 04:39 PM
3

The women now have to feed and wipe the man's butt. The other way is to eat and wipe with the same hand, and reduce the average male life span.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 09:14 AM
19

There is an under representation of female deaths in the workplace, we will ensure DEI policies will become more reflective of the wider community. We will look at promoting positive discrimination policies to bridge the gender gap in workplace tragedies. This is sarcasm, not personal belief.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 03:19 AM
0

They did it for the inheritance, their actions after the fact highlights the greed and entitlement. Being a hard or strict parent does not mean abusive.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 06:23 AM
71

Women have sued men and won in court that holding a door open for a woman is sexist.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 06:11 AM
4

How well do you know yourself? What do you desire at different stages of life? What is your ultimate goal for a LTR? What can you bring to an LTR? What would you like in a partner? Character is very important!
/r/MensRights28/12/24 12:31 PM
3

There are big differences between the character of a partner, and social support structures. If you want to be in a relationship, look at the character of the person. Don't let the negatives of the social support structures determine your relationship status. Those negatives are some of the risks to take into consideration.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 08:42 PM
17

Become famous by association without any effort, thrill of risk and taboo?
/r/MensRights23/12/24 10:05 PM
0

I am not saying the relationship is happy, just overall content. DB is a struggle, and there can be other problems as well. I am not sure what the word happiness means, due to the life I have chosen. He is going to get a fairly biased view if everyone echoes they have been hurt from a relationship. We support each other. A person's character is not really discussed on such issues. A relationship is an investment into the future, and divorce is a risk.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 04:12 PM
2

If something like MGTOW was to come under the wing of Men's Rights, there would need to be an image change. It is important to recognise that while males have been hurt from relationships, they are more than welcome. MGTOW lost sight of healing and personal growth after the hurt.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 09:40 PM
4

Why do you think males had it easier in other time periods? Poor boys had to work in dangerous factories and as chimney sweeps. Short life expectancy. All generations had their difficulties regardless of gender. Husband beat his wife, he gets punished with jail time. Wife beat her husband, he gets publicly humiliated in the stocks. In many ways things are easier and more convenient. There are just new challenges with the times.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:32 PM
2

Your going to have to make it a sitcom style drama. A level of comedy is required. The guy is fallible. Various things come out over time, which includes surving an abusive relationship. There will need to be a lead into some of the serious subject matter, which will need to be part of character development. Some of the comic situations in earlier time periods should provide a bit of reflective insight. If you are looking at including all of your ideas, a movie might be better, with a sad ending…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 07:15 AM
1

What do you want out of the marriage? I wanted a companion into the twilight years. What was important in the person's character for me, and what could I offer? Would the person be there to support me in the future at my weakest? Will I be there to support them? There is more. Marriage can be worthwhile. Married 19 years, 2 kids we have had rough patches, but slowly worked things out together. Overcoming the tough times together brought us closer.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 02:17 AM
2

The deeper point is to look at all aspects of fatherhood and families. Actually, have a welcoming message to a board base and a vision to the future. While it's main focus has been on extrapolated data and make arguments based on that data, it does lack engagement to a broader section of the community. Fatherhood should be an important part of the movement. Divorce laws shouldn't be the main focus of fatherhood in the movement, it should be just one part of an overall vision. Children are the fu…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 06:45 PM
0

The issue is the argument they provide is disillusioned, and you are providing it with to much credit. Most people are reasonable!
/r/MensRights21/12/24 06:13 AM
1

Men's rights needs a multi-generational outlook, with the ability to be both robust and open. Fatherhood needs to be one of the foundational cornerstone within the movement. If fatherhood is only focused on elements of the legal system in relation to divorce, then it undermines the good things about fatherhood, and fostering the next generation. One aspect of the "gender wage gap" is women taking time off work while the male continues to work. This means leave entitlements are more focus to fema…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 01:42 AM
-1

I do respect your point of view, but the subject matter is not quite the same as the structure. Structure of process is very important. Why should I focus on academic points in such a circumstance? I don't want to force my views on my children, but to challenge them, to help them grow. Children are the future, regardless of gender, doesn't matter if informationis true or false. The other aspect is they will still be loved and respected, even if there views are different. This is more powerful th…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 11:12 PM
19

Those women are not relationship material, and need help. I pity them. They are not emotionally mature or have any empathy. Why does their opinion matter?
/r/MensRights20/12/24 07:50 PM
1

There is alot of pessimism in your initial post. A few changes in personal perspective is going to be needed. Each day challenge yourself to find atleast 1 good thing in the day. Over time, try and make it up to 5. Have a diary and write about it, explain why it was a good thing. It could start off as "I had coffee, sat outside to watch the sunset. I never realised until now how beautiful a sunset could be, as it creates oranges and pinks in the clouds. I never focused on appreciating the natura…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 07:34 PM
1

I am not sure if you will consider some of the suggestions on developing social skills i have suggested. Having a pet can help with some of those other emotional and bonding issues as well. My first pet helped me tremendously, instead of my emotions focused on addictions, it was focused on another living being. While it had been unhealthy in many way, I also learned to cry,. My dog being there showing concern and comfort. Waking up to my face getting licked, initially was frustrating and annoyin…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 06:58 PM
1

I don't have any friends, getting out of a breakdown, but am married. Have had addictions and more. Life can be rough. Learn to draw lines on when to say "NO". Look at joining social groups that share your interest. Talk to people around you that are queuing in line, chat with the cashier, get a pet eg a dog(i am a dog person) so you have skills in looking after others. Dogs also show the affection i like. I hope you can start looking for the silver lining of those clouds over head.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 06:30 PM
1

I don't hate feminists. Feminism in its latest formation is marketing itself as egalitarian, which is dishonest. I disagree when the terms like "Patriarchy" is used. It is easy to use as a gender hate, and an excuse for victimhood arguments. Feminism is focused on women's rights, used to provide help and awareness for females. Men's Rights is on the other hand used to provide help and awareness for males. Men's Rights is also unorganised and many aspects to try and help males is not treated as s…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 07:30 PM
-4

I stopped dating nearly 20 years ago. The reason is due to getting married. When I decided that I wanted to get married, I wanted the person to be my life partner. The marriage is not perfect, but we have weathered a few storms together.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 08:17 AM
1

In our marriage, we keep our finances separated. But i try and set the standards on what we should try and achieve. While others will look at pooling the resources. Some of the things that you have pointed out sound like the partner has an addiction. With some of those methods to help prevent frittering away the money. I do understand that the examples also highlights coercive control.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:06 PM
24

When I used to date many years ago, I always said up front "I will only go Dutch" meaning we pay for our own things. If she wants a coffee set, she pays for the coffee set out of her own money. There is no expectations after.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:01 PM
1

It is over protective behaviour by the description you have provided.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:06 PM
5

Women in some mining companies earn 20% more than their male counterparts for performing the same role. This is used to try and get more females into a male dominated industry.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:08 PM
1

It is actually based on gender median pay based on industry. Then base it on a percentage difference on the median numbers.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 01:40 PM
1

Substance abuse can be a real issue. This can lead to many negative things including an abusive environment, higher mortality rates and the struggle to survive. In such an environment there is less demonstration of responsibility and accountability. With a system that is stretched and failing. Using race in such a discussion is not helpful at all.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 04:16 AM
2

How would such guidelines or laws be implemented? Chances are it was increase paperwork and stress, while reducing resources for the kids. How will you be able to tell if a teacher is being biased or not? Who will be judging if the actions are biased?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 05:56 AM
24

Yes men can have standards, trust me! I hardly open the car door for my wife, she has hands, she can open it herself. When I used to date, it was Go Dutch or nothing! If she couldn't pay her own way, then I wasn't interested. This was a simple test on whether they will try and sponge off me. It rounds out most at this point! I never opened the car door for girls I did date either, you have hands, you can open it yourself. I didn't want my partner to feel entitled. So I set standards.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:07 PM
6

In my relationship, I have heavily focused on "Respect your Mother". I supported her. When she was openly starting to get the kids to disrespect me, I withdrew my support from my wife and did not reaffirm "Respect your Mother". After a bit of me walking away from it, the kids stopped listening to her, and even started to disrespect her. My wife mentioned that she lost control of the kids. I didn't be petty about it. I just said plainly, "We need to have a united front with the kids, and you need…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:53 PM
4

In the agreement it would need to specifically state that while you may not be entitled to property ownership, the sale of the property to be split 50/50, or you are legally allowed to stay at a particular property after divorce, and he is responsible for its expenses. He will not be allowed to evict you from that property. Once you decide to move, he is allowed to do whatever he likes with that property. Security of accommodation is important!
/r/MensRights06/08/24 08:35 PM
5

I don't want to go to court, that takes up my valuable time, and I will not believe earning money if that is the case. I can't risk a loss of income.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 01:45 AM
24

Guys have been sued for holding open a door for women in the 90's. Sued for saving a woman from drowning, and performed CPR. Had to undo a couple of buttons on the shirt to prevent restriction on the airway. I am only willing to save female family members, female strangers carry to much of a risk.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 01:43 AM
1

Harassed? I am not sure the last time I got attention from a woman which includes my wife(wife part joking of course). Since actually getting attention as a man from a woman is rare, being able to talk about harassment is treated like he got attention or interest. The issues haven't got as much press. Once there is more economically successful women, it will also shift to focus more on female behaviour. Money is associated with power. With power comes responsibility.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 11:56 AM
45

There are a few things, he had learnt to have hyperagency and restraint, but to also lack assertiveness or exercise power when required. Your son is not going to be respected into the future. There is going to be a time they will say he isn't doing enough to support the family, and will become a slave.(abusive relationship) I might not be smart, but I am married a long time. Relationships require respect, trust, give and take, and mutual dependance. Marriage is about keeping a man on a leash, I …
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:11 AM
1

That is one of the first rules you learn as a labourer!
/r/MensRights31/07/24 09:00 PM
-2

It would harm men's rights if abortion was made illegal. It is a female health issue, and backyard abortions with a coat hanger can be very damaging to a woman's internal organs. There are to many other issues, forced to keep a baby as a by-product of rape? Forced to keep a baby as a by-product of incest?
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:53 PM
7

There are always red flags with these scams, you need to be ready to burn them. I am still waiting for that elusive Nigerian princess. These scams target lonely people, it happens to both males and females. Once they have you emotionally invested, they will start the screws of manipulation to extract money out of you. These scams are an organised business, and they do have a script.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:32 AM
1

The wage gap focuses on both males and females working so they do not have to be dependent on someone else to live or survive in a relationship. The age gap usually will kick in at retirement or later. One aspect is average life expectancy. Women live longer and the average life expectancy gap is increasing. The age gap would focus on health and well being outcome which should help close this gap. I need to think about how to articulate the concept for mutual dependency. I am not an academic,
/r/MensRights29/07/24 07:39 AM
6

Men's Rights doesn't actually have any benchmarks. Being able to have a framework with benchmarks is required. Comparisons are required to set goals, objectives and to establish benchmarks.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 02:36 AM
1

I don't complain about getting kneed in the groin or slapped when I was young and single looking for a shag a couple of decades ago. That was part of the course. A bit of humiliation that comes with it, laugh it off and move on. Both males and females should have the right not to get abused or assaulted. Some guys and girls are fine with sex at a young age, others are not ready for it.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 01:55 PM
2

People drift apart for many reasons, this is a part of life. This isn't gendered. Relationships take work from both people. Ability to compromise on both sides, trust and more play a part. Married 19 years, if you want a companion, you both need to be willing to share the ups and downs. Character is more important than looks!
/r/MensRights28/07/24 01:37 PM
3

I wouldn't be using religion in this at all. Just focus on let your child make that choice when he becomes an adult. His body, his choice! Then there is emotional blackmail, "Don't you think he is beautiful already?" and "He is perfect the way he is!"
/r/MensRights28/07/24 03:24 AM
4

Could also be mistaken as a Muslim as well.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 02:55 AM
4

I have been married nearly 20 years, I went into it with a laissez-faire type of attitude. I was clean from my addiction for about 6 months. I am no model for relationships. We worked through things over time as well. The issue with feminism is it promotes "Strong Independent Females" where as a long term relationship requires a decent amount of "Mutual Dependance". You are not going to be able to do everything, so you both start to depend on each other to do different things in the relationship…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 08:45 PM
2

Life is not perfect. Relationships are not perfect. Relationships can be a bit one sided at times, and it can be difficult. Just live your best life, 👌 BTW marriage advice given to women who is the breadwinner in a relationship tends to focus on being financially and emotionally abusive towards males.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 08:13 PM
1

Wage gap is based on using a median number for each gender. This does not mean there is a correlation between education and income. Income can be linked to employment. If on average, a woman earn the same as a man there is no issue with that. It creates personal freedom. If we look at the age gap, women on average live 5-10 years longer than men. Should it not be fair that both males and females on average get to have 10% of their life in retirement? This will hopefully close the age gap. It wil…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 10:36 AM
1

Base it on 90% average life expectancy. This will mean that both genders. Males can retire at 90% average male life expectancy and females can retire at 90% average female life expectancy. Feminism chases the wage gap, and Men's Rights the age gap. This will give both genders on average 10% of their life made a quality of life. It is a health and well being argument. Yes there are challenges, and it will shift social discussions back towards Men's issues. Middle aged women on average will become…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 09:06 AM
6

I am a very slow reader, I tended not to read much unless it actually grabbed my attention early on. Even if it did grab my attention, usually I also got distracted or day dreaming losing focus. Since I am a slow reader, I was also ashamed which kind of created a push away from novels. Even as a slow reader, middle aged male I am slowly starting to focus on reading mysteries that also have tension.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 02:18 AM
14

Have the law for retirement changed to 90% of average life expectancy. For males and females. If males average life expectancy is 60, males can retire at 54, if females life expectancy is 70, females can retire from 63. This will shift policies to make middle aged females social economic benefactors in society. If female average life expectancy then increases to 75, retirement age will become 68. It will create a paradigm shift.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 09:56 AM
1

There is a plethora of personalities for both males and females. Each person is special in their own way. You are special in your own way. OK! Self harm is not the answer. I have a daughter who is nearly your age. There are many social pressures about trying to conform to group norms and anxiety. This is normal. I urge you to seek help on this, and find activities you enjoy, with a supportive group as well.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:55 PM
2

It could be trolling as well!
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:31 AM
2

I think it really is a mental health issue actually.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:21 AM
1

I think the focus by this for most people, would look at emulating another person. Copying them due to a sense of admiration for particular qualities they possess. Another aspect with copying is you would like to copy those qualities as you see it as a way to become successful. This can be good as it helps to define vision and direction. They can help you grow with admiration and passion. Some other role models can be more subtle, they can be there to challenge you, forcing you to look deeper an…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 08:50 AM
55

When you have 110+ men for every 100 women, the women can set the standards of what they want. This is women in China. Men have less ability to negotiate standards when society in China has a power balance in women's favour.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 06:41 AM
2

Most of my life has been good. 4-5y/o - beaten with mops and brooms by a female relative, same relative strangled me to death(lucky to be alive due to my father providing me with CPR for more than 5 minutes). * The memory of the experience where I was able to move out of my body, see 2 of me and float, the room started to turn white, then I said to myself, I should dhow dad there is 2 of me. Then I looked around to try and find the door, the place was bright white, and it to a bit for the walls …
/r/MensRights10/07/24 05:47 PM
7

Traditional is quite subjective. Males and females have fulfilled different roles to support each other and to grow communities or villages. Through history men and women have had job displacement with technology and even medical advancements. We can't wind back the clock to periods of time we deem better. This is something that appears to be a reference. It would be better to focus on terms such as "mutual dependency" and "character".
/r/MensRights07/07/24 06:10 AM
3

What do you mean by traditional?
/r/MensRights07/07/24 05:54 AM
3

Barbie is for young girls and for that demographic, I haven't seen it at all. Gone are the days action movies were for boys. Where boys debated who was better, Stallone or Schwarzenegger, as an action hero?
/r/MensRights06/07/24 11:11 PM
3

It is what I am thinking as well.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 08:33 PM
5

Alot of the issues is to do with laws of the land. How can you tell a females body count? This is based on trust if her hymen is broken. It could of broken while riding a horse, but still never had sex. In the west it was common many years ago for men to use self deprecating humour and slap stick comedy to get through the tough times. The idiot father is more comical, and men can handle this. You will notice this was never done by women initially as a form of entertainment. Some of this was trie…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 07:48 PM
0

You realise she asked a question that required a bit of thought and reflection. It wasn't used as an insult! Females were open, boisterous, and proud about a special day. A male special day gets shut down, so there is a lack of pride. Notice the difference here placed on the recognition and value. Another aspect is also about shutting down some of the misandry that is seeping into how special days are marketed.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 03:12 AM
2

Very true. The content of the vent might not be appropriate for this sub. I had vented in both marriage and dead bedrooms, the anonymity was what I needed while unburdening myself with my problems. You will not always get the support you need or good advice.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 08:09 PM
8

Why not vent in the mental health sub? Trust is an important thing when releasing pain and hurt. We do understand that.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 08:01 PM
1

One of the biggest fundamental flaws in this is to much of a focus on higher education attainment. Many people that go onto doing higher education will end up with massive debts and a low paying job struggling to survive. Many are sheep, without purpose. I am a labourer, if I wanted to do engineering, first I will get skilled up in a trade and become qualified. Then after many years of practical knowledge move into doing engineering at university to increase theoretical knowledge, but will leave…
/r/MensRights05/07/24 09:12 AM
1

I haven't used a credit card in over 20 years, and I told my wife neither of US will have credit cards. If we can not afford it with our savings, then we will do without it! I do not want to get caught in a debt spiral, and that goes for the family.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 08:58 AM
18

One way to look at it is, "I do not need to seek a place to protect me from the elements, now I get free shelter and food." You realise it has the potential to backfire when many homeless will prefer free food, medical, and accommodation over freedom of movement. It isn't really a punishment.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 07:45 AM
5

You got me laughing at this. It was like calling a male, "a girl" in high school if he lacked physical prowess. It was used as an insult. Females using the term "man" as an insult against each other is funny.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 07:19 PM
1

I know this is written from a feminist perspective for females. How many new articles will be written in a Men's Rights perspective for men? Or for men in general. They are using the incompetent male slap stick analogy, who will mature once given responsibility argument. This is not for the men's rights demographic. It does appear that 50:50 shared custody in divorce is not a good thing by the comments here. Looking to switch it to males getting preferential treatment and custody. This will beco…
/r/MensRights04/07/24 07:10 PM
1

I think a less adversarial approach is best, while it might cause more disruption for the children early on, they will adapt. Remember when going from small-scale to large-scale the results will shift so will attitudes, from fight for the right to entitlement. I think we should be more cautious moving forward. 50:50 will end up enforcing accountability on both sides. The other problem with your proposal is shifting the power dynamic to far again, and trying to protect the institution of marriage…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:06 PM
1

I know it has feminist undertones, but 50:50 in my opinion is the best way forward. It needs to be the standard, not the exception. One has to understand the important factors at play, while divorce can be terrible and emotionally draining, it should try and minimise the impact on the children. What it will end up effecting is the tax base and economic structure. The benefactors of society might even have a demographic shift. Currently the demographic benefactors of society is middle aged men, a…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:26 PM
0

Why not look at forming a few groups, then focus on the 50:50 shared custody. Then focus on doing petitioning and lobbying. The focus on shared custody would be beneficial to all concerned. If you can develop a strong enough grass roots base, then look at protests and political lobbying. I do not live in the USA. So I assume taking on thing at a time, then pushing the fairness argument moving forward. This will help narrow the gap on agency.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 11:25 AM
0

In Australia had 50:50 custody laws put in by the coalition, and it was scrapped by Labor. The issue is highlighting that these social measures are about breaking down stereotypes. Now this type of thing can be used as a case study that can be used to debunk myths that were considered social norms, and perpetuated by feminism. The 50:50 shared custody would help the child form a more well rounded life growing up. In Australia the reason 50:50 custody was changed to a winner takes all was 50:50 w…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:47 AM
1

It isn't a competition!
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:06 AM
1

I don't think a tribalistic position in a winner takes all approach is in the best interest of the child. This feeds into treating children like possessions. The point is taking a more mature approach. While parents may have lost interest in each other, the child doesn't have to become a pawn. It can demonstrate how to be more respectful of each other. It is about maturity!
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:45 AM
9

It will remain broad scoped like this!
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:31 AM
5

And the powers of greyskull. Comical response :)
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:03 PM
1

I was assuming it was adding programming to basic computer skills. You need basic knowledge of sql to do things like setting up a simple database in MS Access, this can be considered intermediate computer skills, but wouldn't call it programming and coding. Backend mainframes on a legacy system. This stuff tends to require knowledge of multiple programming languages.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 09:34 PM
-9

That is a bit condescending isn't it? I have known people that are computer illiterate. They got overwhelmed being put in front of a computer, close to panic attack levels. I am not judging here, it was more an attack on government policy, not personal capacity. There is a big difference.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 03:48 PM
-14

Office can use programming like SQL and basic, to develop macros within the office suite. This is not useful if it is not required just to do once. Administration does not need programming skills, just the ability to use the tools. Most jobs require the ability to use tools, not the ability to develop new tools. It is like teaching someone to become a mechanic before you are allowed to drive a car. You want to be able to use it, but you do not need to know everything that behind the scenes to be…
/r/MensRights27/06/24 03:09 PM
1

China had it skewered the other way. Girls were absorbed due to the 1 Child policy, and poor farmers wanted boys to help work on the land. What became of this is women ended up becoming more selective. What will happen when you have things skewered the other way, and the legal system also against the minority? It will be worse than the China 1 child policy. 2 Females to every male, and the males families not wanting their sons to have a boy. It is a downward spiral that will be hard to correct. …
/r/MensRights21/06/24 08:39 PM
1

I understand your point. The issue here is both the mindset, and the ability to transcend many aspects of social norms.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 01:26 PM
1

The last paragraph is kinda awkward. It is actually an anti-parent statement. If you have children, that becomes very flawed. It actually focuses on a position on selfishness. As a parent, these kinds of sentiments are immature.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 08:56 AM
1

Hand cuffed them while sleeping and ate their asses. That is SA, but there is deprivation of liberty as the guys could not consent to being restrained while they were asleep. Then you have the carefree attitude on top of that.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 12:58 PM
34

If you look at it, males perceive other males as threats to their power. Especially once you have power. Those that were sacrificed I would assume they would of been seen as a threat to the leaders power. The easiest way is to sacrifice them, and their children.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 01:51 PM
7

There is a massive decline in military intake in the US. Primarily males are no longer seeing it as a viable career opportunity. While the promotion is heavily focused on increasing female induction rates, and that hasn't changed at all, it remain constant.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 08:45 PM
7

What we are seeing is an escalation, possible WW3 is closer than we think.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 08:41 PM
3

In Australia it will go through social security, based on needs. I do not know what it is like in the US, she might collect social security payments for the disabled adult dependent while also seeking cash payments from the ex. Do your research on government benefits, and seek advice from a lawyer. She might even be had up for seeking funds by deceptive means.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 10:15 AM
14

Look up Hope For Men
/r/MensRights15/06/24 11:51 AM
30

There are some people in this forum that actually work in the field. Primarily male childhood sexual assault survivors. Some of those that run it are survivors themselves.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 11:40 AM
205

The social stigma males face is much greater than females. In history If a male rapes or abused a female, the male got punished. If the female rapes or abused a male, the male got punished. (Public humiliation) The question is, how much has society changed in its thinking? Hope you are in a better place now, and getting the help you need.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 11:33 AM
6

Almost all future combat will be done at a distance. Drones and drone swarms will be part of this. Large military equipment will take a back seat role to the smaller cheaper drones.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:03 AM
31

Isn't that what they want to do, is close the gap in recruitment, based on equality. If you can't increase the number of females wanting to join, reduce the number of men wanting to join. It is that simple.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 02:38 AM
12

Ah, they do not know why it was considered a subversion against the state, then talks about getting a high level job in the UK government and doing a masters degree there. If they can not see the correlation between the 2, that is kinda funny.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 09:18 PM
1

I do agree with the sentiment. I am not sure if it gets to structured, it could lose a level of robustness. If done right it will not only require being robust, but able to develop important talking points. These points can then be added to places like this as a forum to see how receptive the ideas. A litmus test so to speak.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 08:30 PM
0

I do understand that, and I know this has become a place more for males to vent. I am fine with that, and recognise that is the case. The more serious topics end up becoming an after thought.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 08:20 PM
-4

The issue is to focus on topics at hand. Eg. Mental health with male suicide easily gets turned into a pessimistic discussion focused on how women are valued more than men. This has already created a situation where a discussion could be fruitful changes direction into something that is unhelpful. It can be frustrating at times.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 08:12 PM
1

What are various male rights? Issues do not have to focus on being compared to feminism. This has already created free rent in people's minds. Focusing on male health and well being does not need to centered around a female. If you notice it is there when most people have internalised the health investment disparity, but unable to formulate a discussion without comparing it to women's health. When there is a focus on needs, the discussion already does get diluted very quickly. Where some aspects…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 07:56 PM
0

That then requires video evidence of consent, and video evidence of her consenting to be recorded to consent. It still means on the balance of probability it will be guilty until you have evidence to prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 12:58 PM
3

That is a very interesting report. I had assumed that female prisoners would have it worse, due to rape being used. This actually paints a very different complexion to how I perceive the actualities of POWs. I guess the more structured British model of the chain of command, while not perfect was the lens I viewed these things from.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 09:31 AM
3

I think that there are a lot of similarities between feminism and Men's Rights, but they come from different perspectives. Seeking both equality and fairness Helping those who are hurt and vulnerable There is also a disconnect gender related needs and solutions can get minimised difficult discussions get shut down as it can be seen to impact the others' rights or agency Some ways to move forward recognise that there are limited funds to help people helping one group of people does not mean disad…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 08:21 PM
1

From mysterious to dominate is very situational and requires alot of social dynamics. Dominant can easily become abusive. Being able to ensure respect, trust and more will show the level of emotional and mental maturity. You realise being persistent and dominant sends a signal that being abusive is OK. This should have red flags all over it.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 11:07 AM
1

Why focus on different groups' definitions, which can be used to manipulate? Men's Rights should also look at a variety of options to help males who have been hurt, are vulnerable, and need help. To provide a baseline to recognise a variety of issues that is able to communicate on a number of levels. For example, why is there a lack of funding for prostate cancer, and a lack of males willing to get tested? Just communicating data is not going to help. If the males are known to put others before …
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:36 AM
1

Women have higher animal empathy than men. Animal empathy differs among men. What this premise says is all women have high empathy which is based on gender, men's empathy is based on action. Gender is more important than action in determining empathy.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:40 PM
1

I will have to make a counter argument on the single mother issue. I have known a few that have raised boys. One thing I found that was quite profound for one of them was "raise the boys to become men you would of wanted to date"!
/r/MensRights10/06/24 05:18 AM
1

I think the issue is it is about selling an idea to swindle money out of insecurity. In the case of Tate and his ilk, he uses women as a proxy to do this.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 10:15 PM
2

It is funny how some of the male products were focused on being enjoyable and attractive to women.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:11 PM
2

There is alot of generic self help stuff. Historically the overwhelming consumer base was female, the products ended up focusing towards females.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:08 PM
23

The argument is about a conflict of interest, which can then use blackmail to increase grade.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 02:49 PM
9

There is far more self-improvement resources targeting females rather than males. It is far bigger industry than you will believe. Dating guides were far more heavily focused towards women in the 80's and 90's. It is only in the last decade or so that male self improvement industry has really grown. There are many that are just looking to profit on people's insecurity. Now males are becoming more equal with females in this space.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:49 PM
5

I think using term prostitute is a bit of an embellishment. Some hosts are ethical and do not have a relationship of convenience with the customer's, some do. She might of been a big tipper, or gifting expensive presents. Actually some of the hosts are given things like cars and stuff. Is she a victim, NO! She had the agency to make those choices.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:40 AM
12

Defacto, if I recall is living together like you are married. So living together pretty much. Make sure if you are living together, the arrangement is there is you both have separate rent contracts, or she is paying rent to live with you under a contract. LIVE IN SEPARATE PLACES!!!
/r/MensRights08/06/24 03:08 PM
5

I am no expert on this, but I have an awkward suspicion that the maturity argument is more based on biology and social interaction. Girls on average hit puberty about 2 years earlier than boys. Then there is the social collective group think that tends to develop earlier in girls. There are biological reasons for this, especially when the average life expectancy was less than 25yo, and you were considered to be old at the age of 30+. Females in this time faced more risks especially during pregna…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 11:02 AM
1

Springer RIP.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:13 AM
2

This sounds like it should be on Springer. Sorry about having a bit of a laugh. Not really sure what to say, find a couple of hobbies? She is definitely on your mind alot, and you need a distraction of sorts I guess. If you need help, you should call one of the helplines. One of the things I am doing is small renovation projects at home, spending a bit of time doing research and design a plan. Work out costs, save up then do that project. It will not help get new friends, but for me it has creat…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:40 AM
2

I will rephrase, playful tease him, about you unable to compete for his affection. You vs the cat. It isn't about the competition, but more about there is different ways to care. If it doesn't provide a bit of a laugh, a bit of reinforcement that you are there for him should help him see the lighter side of things.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:28 AM
4

What is worth protecting if there is no pride and honour? If a society wishes to keep its life style and standards of living, it needs to sometimes be willing to defend those principles. An invading military is not going to look at protecting those principles.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:19 PM
6

Do no start trying to posture a moral high ground argument.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 10:42 PM
6

A few countries near Russia have included the draft to include females, and called it an honour to serve and protect their country. This is from a female PM. Being to far away from a war zone, and with a high level of military capacity and capability will have a different perspective to a small country with far less options.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 10:37 PM
5

Your points are correct, but the argument is when feminism is pursuing equality, the biology is no longer considered a factor. The requirements required for females to join are lower than for males to join. If they are willing to join. The draft is about taking pride and honor in defending your country. Does this mean that if females are not legally allowed to get drafted, they do not have pride and honour in defending their country? If females do get drafted, many would be put into back end rol…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 10:18 PM
4

It depends on how it is structured really.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:53 PM
2

The argument is beyond the point of trying to frame it as equity. It is almost like reopening the communist argument of Marxism, everyone should get paid the same regardless of skills or knowledge. A street sweeper should get paid the same as a qualified engineer. The qualified engineer will have a big debt at the end of their studies, a street sweeper will not have any debt. This gender pay gap is very telling of history. Looks like it is history repeating itself! Unfortunately the lessons for …
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:50 PM
8

I don't know why that would be the case. The marriage sub could help with aspects of your relationship with your partner.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 04:07 PM
0

The issue is it will create a toxic environment where it will push males out. It will create a top heavy bureaucracy, that is bloated and male unfriendly. Chances are most of the males would be in higher level roles, and would reaffirm her argument that she has made. The question would be better asked along the lines of, how much money is spent of male vs female wages in the department. This should be another test on equality of employment. That would find about 4-5 times more is spent on female…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 09:46 AM
13

So a gender pay gap is not based on a like for like. So it is based on a median wage within an industry. Pilots get paid more than an air host/ess. There are more air host/ess's than pilots. There are more male pilots than female pilots, there are more hostesses than hosts. What should of been asked is of the department those women were from, is to provide the gender pay details from that department. 78% women and 22% men, with the comment we are looking to make it better! The argument on gender…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 07:16 AM
2

More adorable is when they rub up against the leg of you. Playfully tease it. Like you can't compete with his cat.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 09:02 PM
1

I have known some husbands who have divorced their wives for having 5+ daughters and no son. It is crazy, for sure but these things happen. It is more about a mini-me bonding situation. Feel like you are missing out.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:51 AM
74

Number 1 contradicts 2 and 3.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:43 AM
6

If you don't have pets, talk about maybe getting one. If the place allows for them. Pets can be wonderful companions as well. There are somethings pets can provide that a human companion can not.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:32 AM
14

Just being there for him is probably the most important part. Most guys will hardly share their hurt or pain, as most will not want to burden others with their troubles. If HE feels safe enough to confide, there is a massive sign of trust he has in you. It is up to him if he want to share. The occasional hug is very nice, even if it has no purpose.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:13 AM
1

The issue is anti-discrimination, making access to open to all. The argument in the past was about male privilege, and required equity to make things equal. It is the unfairness in using equity on different metrics to create new arguments on equality. There is an equality imbalance, and equity has become associated with females. Equity is no longer used to create equality. Equity has created a form of privilege.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 08:51 PM
14

Could you not claim to identify as a female, then sue the government for FGM. There are ethical and moral arguments here, and they need to be raised.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:57 PM
2

I am not from the US, so I am using more generic terms that are more cross cultural.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:49 PM
2

The question is about objective. MRA currently has become more about a males in pain or hurt seeking a sense of community. Unlike feminism it lacks drivers of growth, with people of passions leading, backed up with committees and other forms of engagement. This is what sustains feminism, the collectivist mentality. I will digress on that aspect. Here is a question. Is sewing masculine or feminine? I think many people will say feminine, due to the social image. It can be masculine as well, in WW1…
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:25 PM
4

Anti-discrimination stuff. Eg. 70% of the students are female, and they only have female only scholarships. That kinda thing?
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:00 PM
7

Withdrawal of support in social media by other MPs is a sign she will not get another term in the seat.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 11:32 AM
7

Lol, a mistress is a term relating to a woman on the side in the context of a relationship. Why did you think of it in the context of BDSM?
/r/MensRights04/06/24 10:24 AM
1

Instead of that question, would it not be reasonable to ask, who would be the father in the event of having a baby. In our society, rich men would usually have a mistress or 2, so marriage is not really required with less than a percentage difference, maybe up to 2% difference depending which country you are from. Polygamous relationships are not illegal, registration of such relationships is illegal in most countries.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 09:27 AM
7

A female Chinese academic had suggested a woman should be allowed to have 2 husbands, as it will reduce male loneliness due to the massive population disparity between males and females. This was rejected by the CCP. The bigger issue at play now is materialism. If a woman has two husbands, it would increase the materialistic factor. Another issue is life style choice.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:54 AM
20

Both men and women benefit from marriage. The argument being pushed is a victimhood argument. It is disingenuous and cheap!
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:38 PM
3

I agree there are many injustices. Here is where I disagree with you: Feminism is not about equality. Egalitarianism is about equality. Women can be feminist or egalitarian. They can't be both.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:17 PM
7

Expressing emotions for many guys is based on trust. For many of us, in is our core. In that core are many secrets, sometimes we can work it out ourselves. The other aspect is 2 fold, sharing can be a burden, or it can be weaponised. We do not want to burden someone or have what has been expressed used against us. After 18 years of marriage, I had a breakdown it was due to safety and trust I was able to talk to my wife about things at my core.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:41 PM
79

Most OnlyFans do not make much, less than .01% make over 100k per year. Many of those women will crash and burn, thinking that it is easy.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 10:42 AM
11

This is now arguing to maintain male genital mutilation and make it normal. This is establishing the counter argument to create resistance to stop male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 05:52 PM
2

The advice provided is terrible, and is focused on a materialistic idea. Materialism does not mean you are attracted to the person. The advice is be nice to get material resources off the person, even if you are not attracted to them! This is easier if they are old and lonely. The loneliness will be they will crave the attention and affection, and you can manipulate the situation with just being kind, but not having to be intimate with them. This is why they say Diamonds are a Females best frien…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 05:47 PM
1

Gossiping can be used maliciously for character assassination! They can used it to get rid of people they don't like.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:20 AM
1

I just say most of the people in feminist subs and Men's Rights are people that have been hurt and are seeking community. Unfortunately males who have been hurt have far less outlets to seek support and community.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 08:45 AM
30

I think the classification should be general
/r/MensRights02/06/24 12:35 AM
2

A feminist is not an egalitarian! A feminist focuses on female rights! An egalitarian focuses on equal rights! MRA focuses on males rights!
/r/MensRights01/06/24 06:57 PM
1

The next thing after that is stigma of the penis. Would it be considered an unwanted form showing off male genitals. You also have guys being insecure over penis size, and ridicule based on that. These are big challenges, and you will have feminist movements against this due to issues of making it easier for males to do flashing.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 08:16 PM
1

Scottish have kilts, it is part of the national recognised item of clothing of that nation. But it is not considered everyday type of clothes. There will be a number of issues, trying to move forward. Male physical appearance, do we celebrate the male body? How would showing alot more skin for a male project power and strength? There is a massive conservative and unwillingness to change. Will it get passed the stage of being a joke item? Probably not.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 07:54 PM
2

Dresses, learn about history for why that is female and not male. There is a thing called biology. Women required dresses and other undergarments to keep the rags in place. This is many centuries before things like pads and tampons. Is there a reason to try and push the concept forward that has either practical value, or projects a version of power and strength? I can't see it at present. The only option is to refer to it as a modern reincarnation of the TOGA. Clothing worn by males before suits…
/r/MensRights30/05/24 07:31 PM
4

One of the most important aspects of advocacy is the controversy it creates. You have enough media publicity good or bad, it is considered good. Take some language from feminism as well, looking to break down stereotypes that do confine and restrict males in society. To empower males with greater freedoms of expression, not to be oppressed with social bias and conform to a stereotype of male clothing. Or something along those lines. It is going to be a tough sell without media generated controve…
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:04 PM
2

WA has some other laws I would find questionable. I do not think it will backflip on this once it is implemented. WA has probably got the strictest leadership of all the states. I believe they have the will power to follow through.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 05:06 PM
14

You are legally allowed to sell a service, but it is illegal to purchase that service? Let's see it used in another way. You are allowed to sell gum, but it is illegal to purchase gum. It makes the trade questionable!
/r/MensRights30/05/24 09:24 AM
3

The position to follow up with that is: It might be true based on currently recorded statistics. If there was social bias taken out of the equation, could the statistically numbers be different if gender was to remain anonymous or hidden, but only used to highlight statistical differences. For example, many periods of history if a male was abused by a female and reported it, that male would be publicly humiliated. If it was the other way around either nothing would happen or the male would be pu…
/r/MensRights30/05/24 07:41 AM
2

For getting more males on board, it will have to be phrased in a way of impacting the ability to gain employment and earning income. The are not providing resources to minorities to help them gain employment in the workplace after they finish university. There is a far lower male participation rate, and a much higher drop out rate. This will impact the ability to go into fields that they want to pursue. It is a bit feminine in the description. Males are less likely to want to participate in this…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:57 PM
2

Well take help even if it is on race, every little bit does help! Then use that knowledge gained, and apply it to gender as well.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:35 PM
2

This is why you will need the DEI as the platform for moving forward. If possible, get data from the past 10+ years. This will bolster your case if you plan to move forward. Not only will you be using current data, you will also be able to prove a trend as well. Trends are very important in backing up the case. It will mean that instead of improving outcomes and putting in place supports for the disadvantaged minorities, it is focused on preserving, protecting and increasing its entitled elites.…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:23 PM
6

Trans have their own niche In the industry. TS is a common abbreviation for Trans Sexual. What is the purpose? Cause I see it as a failed attempt
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:43 AM
1

The issue is they are using flawed logic. To pursue independence and economic success, then find someone that is out pacing them. It is more like they want someone to compete with. Some of these women have planned things out well in advance, but lack an understanding of what is involved in a relationship. Even if they were to get into a relationship, they would look at competing with the partner.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:33 AM
1

There are a number of issues with this, basing value on looks. Life is never so simple. Some people want to settle down earlier in life and others later in life. I think the beauty argument is over rated. Let's use the analogy of book smarts vs street smarts. Which one is smarter? If you have a couple, one has book smarts and the other has street smarts, they can both use different skills to improve each other and their relationship to grow. They are able to provide synergies to each other and c…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:25 AM
11

I know bugger all about getting buggered! (Joking) BTW, hope this comment doesn't get deleted.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:46 AM
11

Gender fluid, this will screw up statistical data. If personally identify, then at the time if court, you declare you identify as a female. The reason I am against the identify position is it is intangible, whereas biology is tangible. This is useful in utilising the LGBTIQ+ as a counter argument. This has ethical, moral and legal implications while focusing on making a point!
/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:16 AM
7

Start looking at DEI, get official numbers on participation and passing degrees. Start recording all the help and assistance programs for females vs males. The numbers of females vs males on councils and more. DEI will highlight that the place is racist to the core. The lack of diversity of race, the inequality and inequity of genders, and the lack of inclusion of minorities.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 06:20 AM
24

Isn't that a cop out argument? I thought lesbians or guys were born that way. Is Feminism now arguing that lesbians are not born that way, but same sex attraction is created by trauma in a heterosexual relationship?
/r/MensRights29/05/24 06:07 AM
2

I actually pity them. It is very sad that they consider it a rational thought.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 05:41 AM
8

Curfews like this were used in wartime. It was to prevent sabotage and help maintain order. The issue here is legalised deprivation of liberty to a whole class of people without due process.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 03:20 AM
0

Through history, males and females have worked with each other to grow society. Most of this was with small societies or villages. A big issue is unprecedented population grown and density of human habitation. The structures and roles are in a position of flux as we are navigating a massive change of humans roles of a small village mindset to a large city mindset. Some issues at play include longer life expectancy, and lower childhood mortality rates and risks. This has changed many of the dynam…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 08:54 PM
-12

You have less males now applying to join the reserves, and they can not maintain retention for the military services. The choice is to lower standards to make up the shortfall. Males not doing as well academically isn't a bad thing, most of them go into trades. The issue with the behaviour change board is it appears to be about social grooming. If the focus of the board is to help develop infrastructure to help males who have been hurt that is a good thing. DV shelters for males, better understa…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 08:49 PM
1

Through history, males and females have worked with each other to grow society. Most of this was with small societies or villages. A big issue is unprecedented population grown and density of human habitation. The structures and roles are in a position of flux as we are navigating a massive change of humans roles of a small village mindset to a large city mindset. Some issues at play include longer life expectancy, and lower childhood mortality rates and risks. This has changed many of the dynam…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 08:28 PM
2

I would first start focus on married couples. Fathers who take the kids out while the wife might be working. Then a problem arises, the baby needs to get changed, but there are no baby changing facilities in the male toilets at the department store, but there are baby changing facilities in the female toilets. Use stories like this to highlight why it is more difficult for fathers to take their young kids out. There is a lack of facilities available for them.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:23 PM
2

I know a few couples where the women out earn the man. Professional woman do marry tradesmen. If you are talking a step down on the socio-economic ladder, this is the case. The women and men look at skills and characteristics that complement each other in a relationship.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:12 PM
16

I am trying to understand. She gets spanked by her male friends, than asks what she has done to deserve the spanking? I am not sure how it is considered bullying. Did she threaten to say you were spanking her without her consent? Start recording incidents, these records are important as part of future evidence!
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:06 PM
48

He needs to start setting boundaries! He will need to start being proactive. If a box is 13kg and the legal weight for a woman is 12kg, start by putting signs up in staff areas on safe handling techniques. If it is more than the legal weight, then 2 staff members are required to perform the task. He is now shifting responsibility back onto the staff who are to perform those duties.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:57 AM
1

Let's see how it does go.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:59 PM
1

It is kind of how I am looking to rationalise it. Also looking at both strengths and weaknesses of the arguments proposed. To understand and grow, it is important to ask questions. With the RED PILL take, 80% of women want the top 20% of guys. So the focus is to gain status as a form of attractiveness. This does create unrealistic expectations on the basis of measuring attractiveness. It in turn makes a males self worth based on material possessions. If we use a pyramid as an example of hierarch…
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:57 PM
5

I will subscribe and see how it pans out. I agree more compassion is needed!
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:11 AM
8

ISIS men didn't want to die fighting against women. The shame created a psychological weakness, and this allowed the Kurds the ability to successfully combat ISIS. Remember that war is more than weapons, there is psychology in it as well. If you have created a situation where there is a loss of pride, and it has gone on for a long time. You are not willing to stay and defend something you have no pride in.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 09:34 AM
19

The issue is, if you put people into combat that do not want to be there you will end up compromising your combat ability. Once combat starts, those that don't want to be there will flee, making the situation more dangerous for everyone else. The military generals don't want people to be forced to be there against their will. It will weaken military strategies, make defensive positions harder to maintain.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 09:25 AM
8

There are very few places to actually talk about men's issues. While the scope is somewhat limited and the depth as well, it is the best there is. Some guys come here to vent, as they feel life is hopeless and can not meet standards of expectations by society or other male purpose driven groups. The venting is a form of releasing the pain inside, and hoping to find a sense of community. Similar to say how feminism works, but instead of being female focused, it is male focused. You will find alot…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:26 PM
17

Porn can be used to get a couple in the mood, it can be used if one person is denying the other person sex. It is a cop out argument to say that porn is increasing male loneliness. It does not reduce a males ability to socialise, but it can be used as an outlet for those with poor social skills to release that pressure or tension. There can be an addictive quality in the release of that pressure or tension.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:21 PM
19

Feminism on the surface looks at being egalitarianism, but it is not. The issue you have is looking at and following guys who have been hurt and internalised that hurt. Some basic advice, most women are not as bad as you think. If your looking for a serious relationship, know what you want from a partner. This will take alot of internal reflection. Take up hobbies to better yourself. Develop friends with the hobby you have taken up. I hope you can grow and develop confidence and take care of you…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 10:13 AM
2

Which foot? Left or Right? Did you put it down hard or softly? Hope there wasn't any eggshells under foot. Lol
/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:44 AM
19

What you are trying to talk about is egalitarianism, which is different from feminism. Feminism and Men's Rights is about people that are hurt seeking community and help! This is my opinion. One of the big issues is Feminism looks at victimhood as a domain they must control. History has shown if male victims come forward, they were publicly humiliated. There are a lack of systems in place, and strong resistance to establishing those systems to provide help. When you have suicide prevention campa…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 10:44 PM
8

The judge decided that it would not be considered "criminally immoral"! What the judge is saying, it wasn't a criminal act that occurred! Not just in the past, but in the present. This is defining case law!
/r/MensRights25/05/24 09:56 PM
17

In Australia, the more they are pushing DEI for the military, the less people are willing to join. They are not able to maintain retention numbers. They are now lowering standards even more to try and maintain numbers. DEI is about lowering standards and lowering pride! I think the military has a massive image issue, and lowering standards just to maintain the number of troops is a big issue!
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:41 PM
12

Fewer male teacher was based on alot of negative publicity in the 80's - 90's, male teachers having inappropriate relationships with students. That was the nail in the coffin. Actually it was in decline since the end of WW2!
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:28 PM
48

This is more than the press gang methods used by the UK in a bygone era to get personal for their Navy!
/r/MensRights25/05/24 12:46 AM
2

True, but develop a movement that will push the idea that the elites are willing to remove the vote and educational opportunities from young men and force them into military conscription. The government wants to strip its male young of agency!
/r/MensRights24/05/24 09:32 PM
34

It means reducing male participation in higher education as well, unless you are rich. This will skewer higher education numbers even more to make higher education even more feminised. Forced conscription, but not forced to vote? Is there something wrong with this? Looks like males in the US need to start to become more politically active, rather than passive!
/r/MensRights24/05/24 05:20 PM
2

I am aware that legal definitions of terms can change. I thought it would of been under the term statutory rape which mean an adult having sex with a minor. The argument is using the older meaning of rape where only a male can be the aggressor, and the female can be the victim. I think the term for rape got changed in the late 80's or early 90's. It was based on trying to reduce non consensual sex in a marriage. It expanded the meaning, but did maintain the gender bias. The issue is to remove th…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 04:58 PM
49

A female teacher from that same time period, fled Australia to Israel, and is wanted for having inappropriate relationships with female students. Females can't rape males in Australia, they can't commit statutory rape either towards males!
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:46 AM
30

Tell him that you guys don't accept rapist in your group, and since he believes all guys will rape a woman in the woods means that he is a rapist. Take him to a feminist group, and say that he believes in feminist ideals. He believes all guys are rapists, and will feminist accept a rapist into their movement? Make him isolated on it to understand the social impact of the concept. The Man v Bear is nothing but a joke, and a sh!t test!
/r/MensRights23/05/24 07:14 PM
1

Well, if it is based on mtDNA insertion with some additional chemicals added to make a synthetic type sperm, yes that is a thing. It is not at a level to be considered success worthy at this stage. You do also have DNA modification abilities that are a bit more advanced. Is it possible to reach scale to have massive social consequences? Yes In the next 15 - 20 years? No Is there ethical questions to this? Yes
/r/MensRights23/05/24 09:41 AM
8

I just read the article, that is some silly stuff. It will be nothing more than a joke. Now they are providing seats with a butt scratcher installed. Maybe they did this to reduce graffiti by kids. Lol
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:38 AM
21

You already have penis shaped party drinking straws. A penis shaped party drinking fountain. That is funny!!! Will you want a soft drink, or a hard drink? Couldn't help myself with those puns.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:30 AM
59

It's called segregation!
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:05 AM
3

If you want to do civilised depopulation, they are going about it the right way. The issue is, turning things around once it has gained to much momentum. Civilised depopulation will see economic contraction. We currently only have an economic model based on grow, we do not have an economic model based on decline.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:09 PM
21

One of the biggest issues is to protect the DV standard in school. All examples of abuse is Females as VICTIMS and Males as ABUSERS. At the end in small print, these are examples, males can be victims as well. This is to cover themselves. It requires actually providing examples, not just lip service to cover themselves. This just feeds a stereotype.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 05:45 PM
2

I think that burden of proof has to come from the accuser not the defendant. This needs to be brought back as a standard, not to be deteriorated even more without evidence. It is about having the standards that are upheld and not manipulated. I don't discuss non work issues at work, unless I am to take time off. I am socially awkward and also married. As such I will not even engage in banter at work. This causes issues. Will say, if a company puts you in a position to be ethically, legally or mo…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 11:23 AM
8

Monitoring 24/7 means giving up a right to privacy, and freedom. If agreeing to 24/7 monitoring, you are also allowing a 1984 scenario in by deceptive means. The issue is a butterfly effect. A butterfly flapping its wings in one part of the world could end up creating a hurricane on the other side of the globe. A small issue for one person can create serious issues for other people. I would not want to give up both freedom and privacy!
/r/MensRights22/05/24 10:52 AM
2

Yes, instead of going Dutch, they can pay for me. After all they want to break social norms, and anything a man can do a woman can do better. If they are unwilling to pay for the dates, they are unwilling to break social norms to be strong females!
/r/MensRights21/05/24 07:54 PM
7

Nothing a hot water bottle can't fix!
/r/MensRights20/05/24 12:58 PM
4

I will have to disagree slightly on the premise. I do not think that most women want to be a SAHW and be pampered. This takes away their agency and independence. While wanting to work less and have more time to enjoy more aspects of life is not a gendered issue. Life is not perfect, and there are always going to be challenges. I think you should watch and read less of the click bait stuff.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:29 PM
19

I would call this action they are doing is bullying victims into silence. Bullying and preventing victims from getting help? Where is the equal opportunity of victims getting help? Is equal opportunity another name for feminism?
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:18 PM
2

It is testing the waters to see if their is any backlash.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:08 PM
9

I would call it progress in reporting terms, inappropriate to 'predator'.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 10:52 AM
7

It is called the social benefactor. This makes middle aged males the only group that provides resources for society. All other groups are net recipients in society. If we want equality, we need to increase the working age of women to become social benefactors. The increase in the female working age based on average life expectancy will see a strong social push to improve male health outcomes. Extending life and greater contribution to society.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:49 AM
3

Some have suggested providing a warning entering a bathroom. That sounds reasonable. Also report in writing any potential incidents/issues, and get a copy for personal record. This helps cover yourself. Best time is when everyone should be inclass.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:54 PM
5

I would notify the school in advance you were coming on a particular day and time to do your job. Go to the office, and get a visitor pass, and ask if they can provide you with an escort, as you are unfamiliar with the place. One of the biggest parts is notifying, signing in and out as a visitor. And explaining your purpose.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:36 PM
2

What you are suggesting is fanaticism, not patriotism. Patriotism does recognise faults, but you are willing to still accept them. Fanaticism doesn't recognise that, and can be quite zealous.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:29 PM
-8

Right wing also looks at patriotism, putting the country first. Left wing looks at putting the individual ahead of country. I guess government does not want patriotic men. They do not want men to die for their country.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:22 PM
37

They are judging a person's writing based off of their behaviour. If two people write the same paragraph, the person who knows them will mark the one they like higher and the one they like less lower. Rather than marking it blind, favouritism can provide a form of prejudice when it comes to marking. The perception can influence and impact in other ways.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 10:28 AM
5

Your talking about vetting a person's personal experience. The idea is people are honest and provide their truth. Are they going to remove someone where their truth and the other person's image on social media are in conflict? No, as they are a support type group. This allows malicious intent to seep in and allow character assassination to occur.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 06:59 PM
4

How do you know that such groups are not being used for malicious purposes such as character assassination?
/r/MensRights15/05/24 06:48 PM
5

Several things here: Cultural An Islamic man is allowed to marry a non Islamic woman. An Islamic woman is not allowed to marry a non Islamic man. So if you are a male that is not Islamic, you will be required to convert, whereas a woman is not required to do so. If you think affairs do not occur, they but it is easier for a woman to get away with it. Incest is more common, as there tends to be marriages between cousins or blood relatives.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 07:30 PM
29

I only see it getting some traction in the 2030's. This is the framework being established at this moment for male mental health.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 12:21 PM
50

First of all, talk to your parents about the situation. Education and learning needs to be safe. If you don't feel safe doing that, talk to the school counsellor. Chances are they will set the ball in motion for you to get help on suicide prevention. I hope you get help, and your family help with finding a solution to your education issues.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:06 PM
285

This is emotional manipulation, and she is pushing buttons now. If she follows through with that game, it will destroy your family. She will not come out of it smelling of roses. If she does follow through it means petty and vindictive! Next time call her out on that stunt!
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:53 PM
6

The 1 in 4 argument is based over a 100 year time frame, with everyone living to 100 years. It is using a yearly statistic then making it cumulative over time. .25% x 100 = 25% or 1 in 4. 1 in 4 women will be raped(future projection based on a culmination of yearly statistics), that is technically correct. It is manipulation of the data. Yet I get down voted explaining how data manipulation is occurring. Go figure.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 10:16 PM
2

Some might be calling it nit picking, but how the argument was proposed does have a significant impact over time. I was just highlighting a flaw in the proposed argument. It is challenging arguments that then helps to adjust the proposed contention stronger by articulating it better, and highlighting the inherent weaknesses it needs to overcome. The proposed argument was overly simplified! It is a significant number regardless!
/r/MensRights11/05/24 09:54 PM
1

Is this based on yearly figures? With a premise of .25% of the population committing rape, and each rape done by a different person, it will end up with 2.5% of the male population having committed rape over a 10 year period. This argument can be manipulated a bit over a few decades let's say, 50 years that 12.5% of males will commit rape in their life time. While I am not saying the premise is wrong on a yearly statistic, the argument on a cumulative basis has a few flaws. (I hope this helps to…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 09:20 PM
3

Can we expand on this a little bit. While you are suggesting 1 in 400 males have committed rape, 0.25%. On average. Does it also include gang rapes in the figures? Out of curiosity for the actual argument.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 09:03 PM
4

There is a shift towards anti immigration in Germany, and this can be used to market towards reducing such claims.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 08:51 PM
6

There is going to be an increase in European countries doing this. It is due to the Russia Ukraine conflict, and the over immigration population caused by the European and global financial crisis. This policy should help slow down asylum seekers coming to Germany.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 08:45 PM
20

Most dating apps, males usually initiate first anyway. If a female initiates first, it is probably a scam.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:59 PM
11

Lol, influence is a form of soft power!
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:46 PM
6

Your talking about the baby boom period, the period of manufacturing changing from war to focus on civilian production. You might want to think a bit more on the context here. There is a strong glow off that period. There was less legislation, and many of the jobs were higher risk as well. As safety standards improved, so did female participation. Women were free to pursue higher education. Registered Nurses were all female, male nurses were called orderlies, and much lower rank in health care. …
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:42 PM
11

It seems you don't know history, males and females of the working class both had to work to survive. Only in the upper middle classes did women go to finishing school. That provided a highly structured supporting and complementary role to their husbands.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:25 PM
15

There have been rich and powerful females more than 50 years ago. For most of civilisation males held hard power, while females held soft power. Have you not heard of the expression: "Behind every great man, is an even greater woman".
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:21 PM
18

I have lived in various countries. Some places were foreigners unfriendly. Should I try and make waves when getting rejected for rental accommodation because I am a foreigner? There will be discrimination based on whatever reason. Bars, restaurants, and entertainment venues could also be foreigner unfriendly as well. Even in those countries, I also made some pretty cool friends. Don't try and pull the race argument. It is just a cheap stunt!
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:38 PM
28

So femles can segregate or be included based on how they feel, but males are not allowed this luxury? Exclusiveness is fine for female groups, but not for male groups?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:28 PM
60

She is rich and owns multiple properties, yet wants him to buy a property for them to both live in, and he pays for everything? That is a very selfish attitude!
/r/MensRights11/05/24 07:46 AM
5

I hope you don't start using alcohol and drugs as a coping mechanism. Things may appear very difficult. I hope you are able every day, to take a few deep breaths, look around and find one thing that is wonderful, special etc. It could be as simple as seeing the pink orange hue on the clouds at sunset. Everyone has value. The dark clouds will pass.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:40 AM
22

He helped me through my trauma, and was always there for me, now I do not need him after he helped me. It is definitely ego centric, trying to act as compassion!
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:37 PM
11

It is a useful tool to maintain an argument when u know there is no defence. It then uses stereotypes and out dated logic to maintain a victimhood narrative. This actual reinforces a status quo.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 08:15 PM
16

This is a bit more complex than such a statement. It is more about social perception of women lacking agency, therefore are not held accountable for actions. This is a form of entitlement. There is far more media reporting of it to challenge older traditional ideas. It does highlight ingrained bias within the system.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:50 PM
7

Um, the issue is socio-economics. This is a very useful tool!
/r/MensRights10/05/24 12:26 PM
10

Actually, I was talking about feminism. Feminism claims to be an egalitarian movement, but in reality it is not. It is interesting you jumped to saying Conservative.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 12:14 PM
11

If it leads to structural social reforms, it will be a good thing. At present there is powerful forces that are against such reforms. These forces do not believe a male can be abused by a female. These forces are subject to an ideology, and have a very tight grip on DV policy, education curriculum, and are vocal and can intimidate politicians, there are quite a few in the political and legal realms now. This can add pressure to reforms, but will require more than this to have an impact. More dis…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 11:32 AM
26

Males in the past, if they were abused by a female and admitted it. The male would be put in stocks and humiliated publicly. There is a long history of humiliating males if they have been abused by a female.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 11:09 AM
4

Misogyny and misandry does exist, and it is 2 sides of the same coin. The issue is there is a lack of services to help males that have been hurt. There is large social issues against providing help to males. There is alot of resistance to helping males from both males and females. Since developing support structures is very difficult, there needs to be alot of tolerance and compassion provided, even to those that are disillusioned.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:02 PM
19

There is a time and place to call things out. Many guys come here are already hurt for one reason or another. There might be a level of disillusionment as well. The place needs to be safe to vent as well. What you might call misogyny I might call venting based on hurt. This sub I do hope remains robust to allow it as a safe space to guys that are hurt or disillusioned to be able to vent. It seems that some of that robustness over time is getting reduced.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:21 PM
1

More common and economically affordable over time, with it covered under insurance. It will end up reaching a scale of concern. When you no longer require sperm but only mtDNA insertion, the need for men will greatly reduce the need for males. Science and technology has then reduced the need for males in society.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 03:01 PM
0

Male focused cancer research has nothing to do with the gym. Males do tend to have less physically unique anatomy parts than females. The intersectional argument is now about profits for big pharmaceutical companies. This is the point I think you are suggesting.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 08:30 PM
2

Why are we talking about women's health issues instead of male health issues? Unless there is a greater focus on male health in men's rights, men's rights will just become a proxy of feminism. It is just expanding the reach in a more passive manner.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:14 PM
13

Actually that was very surprising, the hard economic influence they have. Something will need to give. Less men willing to work, and single men earning less than single women on average. Lower birth rates, leading to lower carbon emissions. This is actually a sly climate change argument, focused on civil depopulation!
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:42 PM
4

Lol, the woman is in-between a man and a bear. The man runs away, the woman chases the man, the bear chases the woman. The man is increasing distance away from the woman, the bear is reducing the distance to the woman. Hence woman will choose bear over man, bear loves woman more than living man loves woman.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 10:37 AM
5

This does not make an argument why they are incapable of being abusive!
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:18 PM
9

So females are incapable of being abusive?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:07 PM
2

Feminism and Men's Rights have a couple of things in common. People who are hurt seeking help and community. Pushing for issues relevant to the gender at the time. Some issues are in conflict with the status quo and require social change. Men's issues tend to be less recognised as serious issues. It is currently being invalidated by the mainstream of society. Many women's issues were actually bipartisan supported by both genders in the past. At present many Men's issues lack support at all and t…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:03 PM
10

From abuse!
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:53 PM
9

So a man is not allowed to feel safe?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:50 PM
10

That was a gang rape!
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:43 PM
4

Talk to your parents, organise a meeting with the school counsellor and year head teacher. This is about getting things on record. This also sets the stage to getting you help. What will probably happen next is a psychological assessment, with the schools recommendation. Since a rape occurred on school grounds, and you have multiple sources hearing your statement, they will be required by law to bring in police. You will need your parents to push for that to occur. I hope the school is able to t…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:32 PM
3

Start looking to build connections, and some of the advice here can be helpful to you as well. Live your best life
/r/MensRights06/05/24 02:22 AM
2

Yes, same user name
/r/MensRights06/05/24 02:21 AM
33

Volunteering would be the best option out provided. Your doing something worth while, it provides activity, and you get to socialise, and maybe develop friendships.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 02:18 AM
9

Yes it is possible to be loved as a man. One of the things I am currently working on in our relationship is increasing affection and intimacy. Trying to shift from a somewhat dead bedroom situation. My wife is slowly learning to understand that there are needs on multiple levels for a male, as there are for a female. I started by talking about stuff I have done that they liked, helped them feel good about themselves. Talk about that stuff for a bit, then ask a reflective question such as, when w…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 08:22 PM
41

The education system is now starting to collapse in Australia, males not going into teaching for a long time. Females choosing other areas to study with more scholarships available in more fields. With lower birth rates, you don't need as many teachers. They are talking about increasing wages to increase retention rates. Pushing female teachers can be predators as well will not make the education system safe for male teachers to re-enter the profession.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 05:21 PM
65

The first question is she vindictive? If she is stay in the marriage, otherwise she will assassinate your character, and screw you in the courts. You will at that time need to create a separate account to start engaging in a lawyer and follow their advice. If she is amicable and understanding, you can have a robust discussion and work out suitable options with minimal separation costs. Parting as friends. Chances are it is somewhere in between.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:58 PM
19

British Army suggests he is from the UK
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:51 PM
3

Sometimes I went out walking in heavy rain, maybe not sensible, but I needed to clear my head. The rain was nothing compared to the troubles on my mind. Clothes were soaked even after wearing rain protective gear and using an umbrella. It was more difficult to do deeper breaths during those times, but it felt much better to get home and have a warm shower. We all have to go through various struggles, but we all have choices as well. It is what we choose to do with those choices we have.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:35 PM
3

I know life can be difficult. I've been through addictions and more. I hope you can go for a daily walk, or even join a walking group. Stretch and take deep long breaths. Look around, and see the wonderful world you live in. Appreciate what you do have. If you are missing something look at ways to grow and develop.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:03 PM
-2

I assume a Private School, probably faith based with those hair requirements. This is not to uncommon and been around for a long time. Mullets at times are debatable, and I guess this is what you are asking. For boys, it is shorter, easier to maintain. Less discipline required with care. For girls it is longer, takes more time to look after and preparation. Important aspect of image for girls. Requires more discipline.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:45 PM
2

I think it is more based on the character of the person rather than the gender for raising boys. While the argument is valid, and I agree with the sentiment that fathers should be involved for a more rounded upbringing.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:15 AM
3

Think of it as the loneliness trap. At the moment we are talking about male loneliness compared to female empowerment. I think many women that are single and realise that being empowered and single will end up with a situation of loneliness for most women as well. The current argument is over population, and a civil decline in population is the best way to reduce it.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:38 PM
8

One can also argue, women should raise their sons to be men they would like to date. It is a matter of perspective.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 10:07 PM
3

I am surprised the stitching didn't break
/r/MensRights04/05/24 08:40 PM
5

That's funny, over 90% of sex toys are for women. Guess the sex toy industry got it wrong as a business.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:14 AM
2

In the 1970's - 80's, there was hardly any punishment for male teachers at that time. Those affairs turned into relationships. Give it about 15 years, and you will have the same situation as the 90's for male teachers happening to female teachers. The teaching profession will be described as only paedophile become teachers, it being gender inclusive instead of focusing on only males.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:00 AM
12

First one rhymes, second one does not! Why not use: "Happy Spouse, Happy House"
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:32 PM
3

Some one had to add something kin-kee didn't they lol
/r/MensRights03/05/24 02:22 AM
1

This has provided a couple of new insights into dynamics at a deeper level.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 08:31 PM
2

Help him find a new job, once he has a new job lined up, he quits. He then uses up sick leave to the end of the 2 week resignation. The owner will see that if he can't retain staff people for the important roles, the business will crash. He will regret not having other people help your husband, or ensuring safety guidelines!
/r/MensRights01/05/24 07:41 PM
5

Males were forced out of primary school teaching based on media image, and mass media publicity of male teachers having inappropriate relationships with children. This stigma still remains, it will not improve for a long time. With media now focusing on inappropriate relationships that female teachers are having will not fix the damage that has been done in the past. Only a strong 15 year campaign will change social perception, and get guys back into the primary education sector. The risk at the…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:35 PM
1

I went to the Miss Andry beauty contest one year. Yes, Miss Andry does exist!
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:47 AM
204

Breaktimes had been reduced over time, this didn't impact girls, but it did impact boys. The reason for the longer break times was that boys could burn off more energy. Girls get praised more than boys for doing the same thing, this might be conscious or unconscious bias. This affects both esteem and motivation. Now that child sexual abuse towards female students is bad, but child sexual abuse towards male students is praised. We have female teachers only getting a slap on the wrist when they ar…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:39 AM
9

Then there has to draw a parallel, male victims need a place to feel safe, just like female victims need a place to feel safe. It is important that we take care of both male and female survivors. While female survivors currently have there support services, even though it is underfunded, male survivors have no support services. The needs of male survivors may be different from those of female survivors. We need to look at how providing support services will help males, as there is greater negati…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:01 PM
17

Is this at a political level? I definitely understand. Is it open to being hijacked, Yes. If there is a strong ethical integrity component, this should keep the door open to discuss men's and boys issues in greater detail. For example if there is a rise in female deaths in a domestic situation, it can be argued that since males do not receive help to escape from a violent domestic situation, their only way to escape is to kill their partner. If more resources are provided to help males, it will …
/r/MensRights30/04/24 08:37 PM
2

There is a level of disenfranchised and hurt. In this it lacks leadership and direction. Without identifying hurt and where it is coming from, you can not focus on providing leadership to provide a solution. Think of it as a way of hurt people seeking community. It can help provide a safe space to talk. While I think it is focused a bit to much towards victimhood, it also provides a space for people to tell their story, and allow the healing process to begin.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:16 PM
4

He is trying not to get flagged!
/r/MensRights30/04/24 06:56 PM
2

This is a very good foundational step. Passion is important, and can last a few years before burnout starts to occur. Keep this in mind. In this time frame look at developing support structures, and a finance structure as well. With the support structures, I hope that you can make headway with connecting to established government networks, and connecting to like minded networks. The therapists aspect is important. The financial structure should focus on maintaining the ethical integrity of the o…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:15 AM
1

I was thinking something similar, but looking at how to frame many things to focus towards guys, life skills and more. I am talking a wide range of things, construction to sewing, health and fitness, other aspects of personal development, and even things like accountability and bonding. Rather than looking at things from a more pessimistic perspective and victimhood, refocusing on the positive and healthy view of the world. It is about growth and development, think of big brother helping little …
/r/MensRights30/04/24 06:27 AM
1

Both males and females can be resilient, females have more options to get help!
/r/MensRights29/04/24 11:53 PM
9

I hope this does build up a bit of a following. Also at the end, provide links to support services if possible for those seeking help in the state/country. Hope you have a team working with you as well, to help with that type of research. It is not just about stories, but also providing awareness! Good luck. :)
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:35 PM
3

Most people, even those in office would stop for the police! A complaint would be filed later. She should actually get dangerous driving fines, failure to stop, and other fines put on her. She is a lawyer, drove recklessly, failed to stop, and eluded police. Yes it is abuse of office, but also female privilege if there are no charges or everything gets minimised due to being female!
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:19 PM
6

Entitlement and audacity of female privilege should be highlighted!
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:08 PM
1

Alot of the adult children are living with family, if they didn't, they would actually be homeless. Think strong culture of family that has kept the numbers much lower than other countries. This is actually supporting argument to help maintain the nuclear family.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:34 PM
4

It's a life style choice!
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:15 PM
3

If they do not have a family and children, they will spend more money on glamour and prestige disposable items!
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:15 PM
11

It is good and bad, it focuses on developing yourself and giving purpose, it also looks at idealism, and a high level of pessimistic focus towards relationships. Relationships in this thought process is actually contracting itself. It focuses on being a provider and getting respect and admiration in a relationship, but not to trust women. Relationships is the ultimate goal!
/r/MensRights29/04/24 11:30 AM
9

Females have more outlets to get help with trauma than males. They also have more social acceptance to get help as well.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:24 AM
2

I can depend on my wife 100%, and we support each other as well. Coming out of a breakdown, she is helping me through this, and she has also started to understand how important she is to me considering I do not have any friends. We are working on me to communicate more, trying to pull me away from totally shuting down. But when it comes to communicating with out kids, she is focused on spinning it to show I am strong and dependable.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:40 AM
0

Many women like there man to be cut rather than uncut. This is partly for her pleasure, the other aspect is hygiene. If at a young age a female is sexually active, and the male is uncut, chances are there is poor hygiene practices at that time. This will give a poor image of a male being uncut. There should be more information at a younger age about male hygiene practices. This should shift the image somewhat.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:38 PM
1

It should be alienated children, both daughters and son doing this push, not just daughters. While I understand the daughters are affected, it needs to be neutral otherwise it is open to manipulation and being hijacked. It will end up reducing males social capital even more. The courts will listen to the daughters, but not the sons moving forward. Resources will be given to the daughters, and not the sons. I see this turning into form of weaponised neglect against boys in the future. I wonder wh…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:31 PM
2

This is a campaign of children who are now adults who were affected. It seems it is only the daughters (females) making the push here. Does it mean sons (males) voices provide less value in a social context?
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:03 PM
4

Follow your desire, volunteer at animal shelters and have a rescue pet as well. This shows your character by actions. Start living your life the way you enjoy. :)
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:32 PM
12

It is, if it was not groomed from childhood. It has the hallmarks of Victorian era protocols in this as well. It is very strict in how things are done.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:01 AM
9

Yes, it is teaching him that males lack agency! It is concerning they provided him a chaperone for school. It tells me, males are not safe and need to be protected. Think the middle eastern Islamic societies, but in reverse.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:27 AM
6

Just propose the question, is the committee focused on diversity and inclusivity in representation? Will they focus on AFFIRMATIVE ACTION to ensure representation does occur in such committees? Just openly smear the school, and say the school deems boys as dysfunctional girls! Everything is about reducing boys agency, and treating boys like girls! Girls are allowed privacy, boys are not allowed privacy?
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:12 AM
10

Males are just dysfunctional females. This is the argument!
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:11 PM
6

Is it only females or a combination of females and males pushing this argument?
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:04 PM
22

I think both males and females can be stoic. The difference is trust in support structures. Females have more support structures in society, which has allowed females to express vulnerability more openly and get support. Males lack that social support structures on many levels. Without showing worry, the kids will look up to you for advice later in life on how to deal with problems. This helps provide them with confidence because you were able to go through a similar situation.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:00 PM
4

I am married 19 years, after 18 years into our marriage I had a mental/emotional breakdown. It was a combination of things, and nothing to do with our relationship. I think it is more about the character of the person, rather than the gender. I have known both guys and gal's that will gossip and backstab! It is the character of the person that is important! We place trust in the person's character to keep our vulnerability in confidence, but also able to help at the same time! Being able to appe…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:31 PM
3

Any guy that gossips should get beaten up!
/r/MensRights27/04/24 02:35 PM
1

You realise I was talking about drawings, not photos. Even then, it was outlines, no color or black and white fill ins. During 2010, that stuff was actually pulled off the shelves in Japan. Legislative discussions about the sale and distribution of that material was discussed. Off topic What I thought was definitely strange and different was when being invited to do a parent/child sports carnival at the kindergarten, after the class had finished their thing, the kids got undressed and lined up n…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 03:57 AM
1

There would need to be a 3 pronged push. You would need a radical, with a strong voice. This is to pave the way for opening the door to discussion points. This person will be your polarising figure who will not get historical recognition. You would also need a moderate that articulates things that are palatable to the majority. You have a 3rd that plays the support, establishing infrastructure. Establishing background organisations to help direct arguments to shift social policies. This is a dir…
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:11 PM
1

It stopped being sold in 2010 while I was living in Japan. I had lived there from 2005 - 2013. There was stuff in the news about that in 2010 surrounding the argument of gateway to pedophila or it being it being used as a source to deal with one's tendencies as a substitute to the real thing. Sorry, but I am a foreigner, not a Japanese native. I do not know if things had been reversed since 2013. Also, the censorship industry is very big in Japan. This could have had an effect on repealing some …
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:00 PM
1

Used to be, it is now illegal! Possession is not illegal, don't know if they did extend the laws since about 2010. I remember seeing them being sold in Japan when I used to live there. I told some friends that I would be arrested if I possessed stuff like this where I was from.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:21 AM
2

Get some strong candidates that focus on men's issues, and have a rallying call!
/r/MensRights25/04/24 06:28 AM
8

I feel for those in abusive and coercive relationships. While I am not in one, it is important to recognise these do exist, and there are many social barriers that need to be overcome. Social perception bias is a very important factor.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 02:12 AM
16

There are some big red flags, complaining about a partners hobbies, while they contribute to the family. Lucky I am married for a long time, yes there are issues. But in the end we have each other's backs. The standard of attraction is based on how much you can give me is very shallow for commitment!
/r/MensRights25/04/24 01:53 AM
13

Communication is important for sure! It tends to be easy to tell when a guy does orgasm, but it goes for a shorter period. I have heard guys can also orgasm without cumming. Something that is new to me. For most women, it requires more time and preparation. For me, my wife has pushed me away in the lead up to having an orgasm. Kids in the room next door, never had an orgasm, and scared of what will happen. This is something that has hurt alot, because I would like her to let go and enjoy the fee…
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:08 PM
2

A pill to make a man temporarily sterile? What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:16 AM
1

The expression "A man's home is his castle" comes to mind!
/r/MensRights22/04/24 07:48 PM
48

You realise almost all comedy, especially slap stick was performed by men. We can laugh at ourselves, it is harder for a woman to laugh at herself!
/r/MensRights22/04/24 04:39 AM
0

Not sure about how true that argument is. There are alot of love hotels in Japan though!
/r/MensRights22/04/24 03:11 AM
9

Is that all they have, chikan porn stereotypes? The pedo thing would actually be from manga drawings of naked young girls. That has been banned from sale since about 2010! Some anime did partial nudity in a funny way.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 11:50 PM
178

She is petty and immature, you dodged a bullet
/r/MensRights21/04/24 07:05 PM
12

You are seeing egalitarian females slowly shifting away from the movement. Let's ask this question, if there is a lack of male teachers in primary education, and female teachers are now abusing their power in that role. It is going to create a situation where both males and females do not want to work in that role. Media has started to shift direction. This will create a loss of power for the movement. The stage is getting established at the moment, and once trust gets eroded, trust in the movem…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 09:47 AM
70

Damn, truth is stranger than fiction. Sorry, but I laughed at this it seemed so crazy. Atleast she was arrested.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 07:05 AM
-1

Red pill has its good and bad points. Let's talk a bit about things before the spinster stereotype. It is primarily created by guys who have become a hurt and pessimistic from past relationships. This is important to take into consideration as we progress forward. From this point it is about focusing on personal development, improving yourself, and providing purpose. This is very important sign of being positive. The process for some other aspects is more about becoming a traditional 1950's cons…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:27 PM
4

Suicide is based on statistical data. More dangerous jobs is the risk of fatalities if something goes wrong, or the types of jobs that has a high level of incapacitation/health risks compared to other jobs. Working in coal mines in the 1900's had alot of risks, lights burning up oxygen, breathing in coal dust, carts in they lost control would be fatal. This is an example of a dangerous job. Safety standards have improved, there are alot less risks, and due to the increased safety standards, almo…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 08:26 AM
-4

I don't really care. The medical aspect should be pushed to legal age to vote. I dislike forced pronouns of the gender spectrum. I dislike you can change you gender before it is legally recognised. Feminism created this by pushing the victim narrative using psychology. This is a pushback on males competing as women in sport, and possibly used to take up scholarships from biological women. Trans women are more discriminated against than biological women, and there for need more help. Intersection…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 08:09 PM
4

Look at what is happening, in less than 20 years teaching will be a career that will be seen as only pedos only do. Males are seen as guilty until proven innocent, it took a while to get that mindset. Now women are getting flagged, it will take time but it will become a career no one will want to pursue.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:16 PM
74

If there is no trust, there is no relationship! If there is no respect, there is no relationship! Set boundaries, and stick to them!
/r/MensRights19/04/24 11:41 AM
3

I hope you can develop more confidence in yourself and learn to set boundaries, even though they can be painful to enforce. You are a strong person who has gone through alot. You have survived, and that is very important.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 11:36 AM
2

Are you asking if the grass is greener? If you like the particular culture, sure. If not, no.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 06:28 AM
2

We kinda agree. Who will be better at providing the more physical requirements of that desire? Good strong hands! The aspect of value is subjective!
/r/MensRights18/04/24 11:55 PM
1

While that generisation has merit, I will have to disagree. You will have many women who are academically smart that will want a man who is practically smart. She might be good with more of the paperwork stuff, he is good at fixing and repairing things. They are able to compliment each other in different ways. If you are talking about sapiosexuals, then the intellectual aspect is a high requirement, and the lack of males going to university will not cause harm to these women, as intellectual con…
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:20 PM
3

ROI will factor cost vs ability to repay. High debt linked to indexation plus inflation. If you have 30k debt, and earning only 60k before tax, if you do not actively repay the debt, and only let it come out of your taxes, then that debt will balloon.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 07:49 PM
2

If they try and go the Whitlam route to free higher education for all again, you will have that government kicked out of office!
/r/MensRights18/04/24 07:23 PM
2

This is a very well thought out argument, something that does require a much greater depth of discussion. Depending on how the micro society is set up, it could work out great, or create a new class warfare argument, or fail terribly. So Universities will need to rebrand to from getting an education for higher pay, to a more family friendly life style choice? The issue with some of this is how will the eco system work in an economic sense?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 07:20 PM
3

That sarcasm lol
/r/MensRights18/04/24 07:04 PM
4

This is where we are at, an over supply of degrees in the market creates downward pressure on wages. It is these kinds of things that should be used as examples. I hope it provides a more positive spin for guys who are feeling pessimistic on the situation. But give them hope. :) Thank you for that
/r/MensRights18/04/24 11:46 AM
3

I definitely agree with your first paragraph. I was talking with some office people the other day about how we get some of the apprentices to do some of the work. The usage of practical maths, such as using Pythagoras Theorum in some of the work and other basic math. Many of the office workers had forgotten about that stuff, as it isn't relevant to them. I think vocational pathways are very important, and should be expanded.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 11:36 AM
3

This is called education creep and requires a much higher education or skill level to actually perform the role. This is definitely something that should be explored in more detail. Will education creep be considered an act of discrimination? Or is it because of an over supply of degrees in the market place?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:51 AM
3

agree 👍
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:06 AM
4

No one will make that statement in the last sentence. They would of factored in many things, indexation would of been one part of the financial aspect. It would be more like, I didn't see it providing a good enough financial benefit. Or I will do a trade, and then pursue a degree to build on the work experience.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:05 AM
6

It is good to start asking those financial questions, and then make a risk assessment and take a calculated risk. :)
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:57 AM
13

One of the more interesting things is Women's Studies used to be at the lowest cost band at university, now it is in the highest cost band at university in AUSTRALIA. The highest cost band reflects a highly specialised discipline. Some engineering degrees have dropped in price, due to a lack of specialised engineers. The women disproportionately affected will be those doing Women's Studies. Higher debts, and in a non specialised field. The government did this to help rebalance education so jobs …
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:01 AM
23

I think the economics of the situation will cause a loss of faith in universities. High debt, and ROI will be a big talking point. Once the ROI aspect gets more traction, you will see a decline in higher education.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 08:35 AM
35

Higher education was marketed so well, it became a victim of its own success. Many women saw it as a way to become self sufficient, that the expansion of it then pushed educational requirements higher for certain jobs. This longer period kept people out of the job market and increased debt. I am keeping out of the victimhood argument of this. Looking to explore other arguments There are some structural issues in primary and secondary education!
/r/MensRights18/04/24 08:07 AM
12

Damn, wait till infanticide of boys takes full swing. They will end up with a population implosion!
/r/MensRights18/04/24 06:54 AM
4

I don't think he knows what CFNM means. CFNM is Clothed Females, Naked Males Storm in a tea cup outrage
/r/MensRights18/04/24 06:14 AM
2

The reason no one was on board is it is a women's rights issue, not a men's rights issue. I think you need that proposed suggestion done in more egalitarian forums of reddit, it will give a more balanced view. Atleast in theory.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 07:23 PM
3

I was actually challenging your contention, with a different measurement standard. There is not going to be a one size fits all approach, but it is important to minimise risks, and explore options even if it is contrary to one's belief. I think it was important that you did raise that line of thinking though. You should not feel bad about it!
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:56 PM
14

The whole psychological aspect will end up with population collapse. No economic subsidies for women. Poor women will become slaves. The economy would crumble as it will be in heavy debt and no way to pay it off. The competition between women to actually secure a man for themselves would be a major social status thing. Women will end up having to slave away even during pregnancy. Men are just treated as objects. It is an elitist female fantasy, a dangerous one at that! It will be interesting tho…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:08 PM
3

Pregnancy while a medical condition shouldn't be included. It will be open to abuse. What will be the ways to prove this temporary condition is real rather than faked? Most other conditions you can get a government concession card in Australia for it. You need to meet the standards of proof before one is issued which includes economic circumstances. I understand your coming from a good place, based on needs and vulnerability. But what systems will need to be put in place to verify eligibility an…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 05:57 PM
2

Here is one. In some of the more religious based conflicts, the male feel more shame fighting and dying against women. So they take on a more defensive stance. It is more of a psychological aspect.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:47 AM
11

It's been like that since the '80's, and scouts since the early 00's
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:05 PM
11

There is the YMCA (was originally for boys) and YWCA which to this day is still girls only. YMCA = Young Men's Christian Association YWCA = Young Women's Christian Association YMCA became mainstream due to the Village People song
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:54 PM
9

There are groups like "Mothers of Sons", that are looking to help provide fairness for boys.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:47 PM
4

It is a mental health issue! Yes, it is a tragedy, and most of the victims are female. You are drawing the fact that since most of the victims are female, it must have been an act of misogyny. This is nothing more than a gutter argument. You are minimizing the deaths and injured males. This undermining of some victims tells me you are not an egalitarian but a feminist. If you follow that argument, it gives justification at a political level to pull support for males seeking help. Since males can…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:02 PM
2

Lol, you don't sound like an egalitarian to me. Had a look at your stuff, nothing but trying to goad and provoke. Just like your last comment. I feel sorry for you, and pity you. Good luck with your life! Egalitarian means everyone should be treated equally and fairly. The way you talk is nothing like that!
/r/MensRights16/04/24 01:28 PM
2

Your in the top 20% if you make $500 per month, the average woman makes $100 per month. The top 1% makes $5000 per month. This is on OF. The companies are for sure, most of the content providers are not.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:53 AM
59

Don't split, "Go Dutch"!
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:46 AM
1

I know some questions I do ask can be challenging. If your objective is to pursue equality, wouldn't the real test actually have it applied to defending your country and the values you stand for? I know this is derailing the topic. But back to the media, this should be treated as a mental illness case. It is just silly to market it as misogyny. We are already starting to see subtle social shifts. Even mentally ill people can make choices. Greater alienation, hurt, and echo chamber's are issues. …
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:29 AM
4

Lol
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:59 AM
1

Lol, how about robust discussion on topics?
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:58 AM
7

I got banned for asking about a female PM changing the laws so both males and females can be conscripted. Is this considered equality that both males and females have the honour to defend their country, and protect their freedoms? I was thinking it is kind of humorous they do not like to discuss such topics of equality.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:50 AM
19

Lol This is open mocking of a movement, and using the movements own words. They shut down egalitarian males. Egalitarian females are barely tolerated. Don't get me wrong though, it helps women who have been hurt find a sense of community. This is important as hurt people need help. But I am mocking it as a political movement! You have media pushing a political narrative. Political is fair game for mockery!
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:34 AM
40

This push saying everything is misogyny will end up creating a segregated society. It is going to say men are not mentally ill, they are misogynists. Only women can be mentally ill. I like that argument, all men are misogynists, all women are mentally ill! This over reach of a joke called feminism will end up painting women as mentally ill children.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:07 AM
12

A piece of paper does not determine our feelings. Being committed to each other does. Times and traditions are changing. I want a relationship with you, not a relationship with the state!
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:23 AM
37

I think you need to test the waters when it starts to get serious with a bit of ambiguity in this matter. How will they react to the ambiguity, in a caring manner? Joking manner? Dismissive manner? Women test their men, and men can test their women. An example is a sprained ankle. If she cares, she will want to help with its recovery first. This kinda thing.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 09:03 PM
4

No, it creates a permanent position of oppressor/victim mentality. If a female gets slighted, they can use this as justification to be a victim.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:47 PM
23

With my wife, it is part of the foreplay. I will be happy she is enjoying herself, but it hasn't gotten to the gratification on my side. Usually sex involves a form of penetration. Would I be jealous if another guy was to eat my wife? Yes I would actually come to the conclusion that eating pussy is a sex act, even though penetration was not involved.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:45 PM
8

What you have suggested, professional feminists will deny males have mental health issues. Only women can have mental health issues!
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:35 PM
1

Does it mean they are handicapped and need a tag to leave on the dash. They will also need to register, and restrictions put in place to get that.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:31 PM
3

There is the gender wars that is taking its toll on both sides. Cynism could be a result of depression, things they have absorbed like male victimhood that does get promoted. When you have messages like more scholarships for woman in higher education and more women in higher education than ever, with 80% of women want the 20% of men this can create a pessimistic and negative spiral. A loss of self worth has occurred. Just use soft gloves, and take an interest in what they talk about. Do not prov…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:43 AM
10

Your asking for studies that are not funded by feminism directly or indirectly? Your looking for studies more than 30 years ago that are not tainted. You will not get a large scale study that isn't tainted in this age. Are we talking male, female or both victims?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:24 AM
7

It is insecurity projection, and then using things like intersectionalism to justify their insecurity. Then you have the lesbians that push the man hate, so they come across as caring, and use it to seduce vulnerable women to become sex partners.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 10:57 PM
1

It will remain a niche, it is that simple. Those males will be pidgeonholed and will not get anything beyond the stepmother or student segments of the industry. The body type and look will not get them to other areas in the industry due to their looks and build. The schoolgirl thing has been around for a long time. It is just a flavour of the month. C*ckold was a big focus about 6 years ago, CFNM is similar. The more female assertive aspects of porn. It is the youthful male getting the spotlight…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 10:30 PM
7

That is why the infrastructure isn't there, it gets torn down quickly. There needs to be more men speaking up, and articulating this in the court of public opinion. I think the networks are not in place to actually pursue this in a proper fashion. These networks are required. There is a strong need to get more female egalitarians on board. I feel there is a shift of egalitarian females slowly distancing themselves from feminism.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:57 PM
11

This is why males need safe spaces to vent. The infrastructure is not there to actually provide that support. A social mindset shift is occurring slowly though.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:22 PM
1

The issue is the penis is still considered taboo. It will not cross over to things like health care and more until it is more normalised. The shelf life of the youthful looking male is about the same as the youthful looking female, 28-30 yo. Beyond that nature takes its course. I am not to worried, but there it will start to build up steam that will push for a less biased legal framework to help boys who are victims of abuse by females. The objectification and sexualisation will shift attitudes …
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:16 PM
1

I assume it is actually generic. Eg. Not getting the performers to say they are under the age of 18, things like that. The male penis is usually not a focus point. I am not a legal expert, I am only going on discussions that had legal implications that I remember. The laws are similar I think between Europe and the US. I live in the Oceania/Asia region where this has different cultural issues of production and marketing. I think the porn industry will be careful until it is more common to have m…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 08:57 PM
1

I am saying there are laws already in place about conduct and promotion of youthful looking adult performers of legal age. This has been discussed many years ago when women were the center of this. It is a niche market in the world of porn. If you want to know the differences, it is scale and focus. There are more female performers who are the star and focus. Since there hasn't been much of a focus on male performers, and the pool of male performers is small in mainstream porn. This actually hig…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:41 PM
34

How would this conflict with the discrimination act? Legislating speech and control, this is 1984 with such a move. It is a lose/lose move. It will stifle an form of communication, and really push segregation to occur.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 10:46 AM
2

I know tests were done in Japan about 15+ years ago with multiple sample groups. They were tested before the tests for their baseline. The tests range from 1 week to 3 months. The guys were to sit and relax in 40 degree Celsius water for 30min each day(if I recall correctly, it might of been 1 hour). It was only after 2 weeks of this that quality started to drop. At 1 month they were sterile, it took about 1 month to get back to normal. The longer it goes like that, it increases the chance to be…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 08:06 AM
1

Marriage in what sense? I think you are trying to super impose both religious beliefs and legal registration aspects. If you want a bit of history from another part of the world. In the early 1900's in Japan, they reduced the cost of getting married and divorced. With this, you had an increase of both marriages and divorces. Did those high rates remain? No, they settled down over time. Yes, there are various issues in the legal framework that is causing these divorces, and lowering the rate of l…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:54 AM
2

A contraceptive option for men to make them temporarily sterile. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/health-news/can-bathing-with-hot-water-reduce-male-fertility/articleshow/107056709.cms
/r/MensRights13/04/24 12:53 AM
0

I think Men's Rights can come from the left, right, or moderates like myself. The issue is, what is the focus or objective? Moderates like myself are more egalitarian, seeking fairness. The left looks at equality, trying to find solutions through a victimhood mentality. Over analysing the information and it gets skewered. The right looks and trying to maintain a status quo, and feeling disillusioned through loss and change. There is a far more cautious approach, keeping values and structures in …
/r/MensRights13/04/24 12:39 AM
13

Character and disillusionment! What is being promoted is a sense of purpose to build yourself up. This is good in many ways, but it can not be living in a vacuum approach to self development and growth. I think what is lacking is communication experience. The perseverance in pursuing purpose is important. What it provides is you do fail, but are able to move forward to achieve goals. You start off learning, usually with many failures and lots of doubt, you push on because you have a goal. When y…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 11:13 PM
1

Is it because they use English instead of Latin?
/r/MensRights12/04/24 08:49 PM
-4

If there is a massive lack of participation for one reason or another, alternatives need to be created. This isn't about victimhood or things of that nature. There was a big decline in young families, and children within the Church. There were connection and engagement issues. More people are now attending mass, and afterwards we all chat over a morning tea. Tea, coffee, juice and some nibbles. I don't care who came up with this in the parish council, it was a great idea, and has lead to more pe…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 08:39 PM
-2

I am in a very multicultural church. It used to have a strong Italian and Polish community presence, 30 years ago, now it has a strong Filipino presence. I can say that there has been cultural changes do to different communities involvement. Why is it there are alter girls and boys now, when it used to be only alter boys? The number of boys participating in that role had dropped, so to help make up the numbers, they included girls into that role as well. There is a strong focus on understanding …
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:54 PM
3

Going Dutch is better than 50/50 on a date. She pays for her stuff, you pay for yours.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 06:23 PM
13

Females have more options, which includes getting help from shelters, divorce, and various social programs. Males have far less options. Why has the deaths of males dropped from DV, while deaths of females has remained fairly constant? Could it be, females have more options to get out of a violent relationship, so they do not need to kill there partner. While males who have far less options to leave a violent relationship, means killing their partner is a means of escape from that situation.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:57 AM
6

If you are looking at suggestions to bridge the gap. The use of terms such as "patriarchy", "privilege" should be dropped when discussing topics. What these actually do is insert bias into the discussion, and allows room for victim/oppressor manipulation to occur. It can then allow topics that feel uncomfortable then to be minimised or discounted. I don't think calling people out using those terms either does help. From my experience, it just creates hostility. Just lead by example by refraining…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 06:42 PM
2

He also wrote the book "The myth of male power".
/r/MensRights11/04/24 06:07 PM
28

Lol They are saying they don't want to be remembered. It is a cheap funeral anyway. It is hardly an insult. It is more a reflection of their self-worth!
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:49 AM
152

It is a deceptive and manipulative tactic. It is about trying to shift power dynamics. It reduces the ability to be empathise and minimises others experiences. It uses biases to control a narrative. Let us know how it goes!
/r/MensRights11/04/24 09:42 AM
3

Yes, there are structural issues of wealth and power in society. This is a divergence of issue, moving into that realm. The issue is that many of the women who were using such terms even got abused and made fun of if it didn't fit the overall narrative. I think many of them are hurt in one way or another, but using it more as a way to vent or show support by feeling they belong to a community. The more shrewd feminists will use this as a form of anti-establishment vehicle to increase power and c…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 07:34 AM
12

The patriarchy concept is heavily pushed on that sub. I noticed there is also alot of viciousness on there as well, even toxic at times. So long as it is blamed on the Patriarchy it is fine!
/r/MensRights11/04/24 06:42 AM
23

Let's look at things both have in common. They both have people hurt and disillusioned looking for a sense of community. Feminism has a much more evolved framework to help females have been hurt. Men's Rights is in its infancy in this regard. It is important that structures are put in place to help men who are also hurt. (There are benefits to women with these structures put in place to help men. It is a downstream effect, not a direct effect) Differences are a big one here, intersectional theor…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 06:01 AM
15

This kind of discussion happened in the 90's with females. Tried to reopen it in the early 00's, that had some small changes. Spinners are in a similar type of role. Short thin and light. The girls tend to be a more niche segment now. It is nothing more than a fad, there needs to be proof it is more than that.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:44 AM
1

I assume they are a protected class, like most other minorities.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:38 AM
7

The issue is legal aged consenting adult performers are providing a role play fantasy. It is going to need more than a youthful look argument. Studies need to be done to see if there is possible causal link. The other point of concern is now dealing with the LGBTIQ+ movement. MAP or Minor Attracted Person is now considered an orientation, and a protected class.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:05 AM
-2

It implies consent was given!
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:35 AM
5

Statutory rape is used based on consent of a minor. A minor by law can not agree, even if they do consent to sex.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 08:13 PM
18

This is a teenage mentality from an older generation. The idea is fine, but not in practice. Along with it came bragging rights. We are in a situation where things are becoming more manipulative.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 08:11 PM
28

They are trying to do the same with many boy only schools in Australia. Some of the strongest advocates to keep the school's boys only come from the mothers of the sons at those schools.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 08:06 PM
-2

Contagion from the Ukraine war?
/r/MensRights09/04/24 08:01 PM
68

Violence Against Women's Court? Talk about ingrained sexism into an institution! Fairness is stripped away from the process.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 07:59 PM
1

Hard core ones? Nope Ones that are disillusioned, hurt or in pain seeking community? Nope Ones that's believe in fairness and equality? YES It is the hardcore that tends to be more vocal. The disillusioned are following the loudest voices wanting to fit in. I feel sorry for them, but it does allow them to find purpose. You can have robust discussions with feminists that believe in fairness and equality. Many of these women do want safe spaces for boys and men to talk. Room for them to grow or re…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 02:56 PM
2

Zero sum antics??? How long do you think change occurs in normal democratic society? It moves slowly. The feminist movement has been going for more than 100 years. It has moved to far. Do I think there should be safe spaces for men who have survived DV? YES Should more resources be made available to help men escape DV? YES Some academics have suggested that providing resources to help men escape DV, will reduce the number of female deaths of DV. If there is more options available, if the abuse v…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 01:14 PM
3

There are more fundamental issues, declining birth rates and economies being propped up by immigration. This will have a big shift in mindset at a macro level. Why focus on a war of the sexes? The message has to be palatable for most of society. Education, the break times should be made longer to deal with the excess energy boys do have. Reducing breaktimes ended up seeing a slow decline in boys participation while an increase in girls participation. This is structural issues. Teachers can imple…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:01 AM
2

LOL Some curriculum needs to change such as how DV is presented at schools. It is to heavily biased with the women being victims, men being perpetrators! You have just made the argument for that case to remain with the status quo! This is just one of many soft touch approaches. What will happen with your approach with using fear to maintain control? I know you haven't thought much on the impact and what is involved in that negative spiral.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 10:20 AM
7

Um, your talking about assault? Mental and emotional domination? I think you're dealing with a lot of unfairness, hurt and pain. This route will justify feminist arguments. I will passively support progress back to equality, I will not support assault or domination as tactics. Nor will I look at victimhood mentality as a positive driving force for change.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 10:10 AM
28

That is disturbing stuff. If a coordinated campaign can be created, focus it on prominent celebrities products. This will get brought to media attention. With it will have to require rallies, and a media blitz. This will bring a position of shame, and if it was to be taken to court, more publicity will be generated.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 07:59 AM
1

Empathy is a very important and a positive trait to both develop and have. I agree whole heartily with you to a degree on most aspects. Basic empathy doesn't focus on personal growth, it does help to understand the other person's perspective. Able to understand the other person's experience, allows you to also grow to become a better person. Religion does get a bad rap, especially by people wanting to feel morally superior. These people tend to lack empathy, it is more about power to them. It is…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 07:40 AM
4

All you need to say is you don't want to get involved, it isn't your responsibility. Responsibility means being accountable under the law. Who is to say what is happening isn't staged for social media. You don't want to be put on blast for someone else pranks.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 04:38 AM
21

The snowball effect is interesting. It is only when it crashes will things change. The top remains in tact, it is the bottom that gets wiped out.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 01:04 AM
8

More women are involved in music than men. But the area where men are more involved is discriminatory. You might have 10 violin players, but 1 piano player. 4 out of 11 musicians are men, 7 out of 11 musicians are women. I think there is a distribution issue.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 12:58 AM
31

This is a feminist narrative. You are not crazy!
/r/MensRights08/04/24 09:00 PM
7

Religious is not inherently bad. I am religious, and many people I know are also religious. We use religion as a form of moral compass. Someone who has become a religious zealot is also unpalatable. On the flip side, they do have passion. The conflict in ideals and a lack of ability for both parties to compromise is definitely an issue.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 08:34 PM
4

The issue on a lack of sexual or relationship experience is questionable in some ways. Having experience is not a bad thing. The issue is when they use that experience to bring the partner down. Comparing to previous partners is a bad sign, eg. X was better than you, creating insecurity in the relationship. I have never compared my wife to past sexual partners, and vice versa. Conservative is actually debatable. I am fairly cautious and quiet, my wife is quite social. In social settings, my wife…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 08:19 PM
1

The shifts in education need a small nudge approach in some areas of curriculum and longer break periods. The removal of everyone gets a participation award to bring back only awards to top 3 will see a massive swing in education again. A shift in curriculum can be having a balanced approach to d.v. This is currently heavily biased. Teachers should also look at getting the best students in the class to help the weakest students in the class. This isn't a new approach, but it is useful. The best …
/r/MensRights08/04/24 07:55 PM
2

The people helping the former child soldiers are actually risking jail time. This is not government helping in these matters.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 10:32 AM
15

Back in the 90's, warlords in Africa would go into villages, recruit the boys with force, kill the adults then rape and kill the girls. The trauma of the boys who became soldiers is unimaginable. The horrors they had both inflicted and endured. There are places in Africa that are trying to rehabilitate these boy soldiers that have fled the warlords.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 07:25 AM
15

What is being suggested is getting a fair result from a poisoned well. The intention is good, though! :)
/r/MensRights08/04/24 06:25 AM
35

Then we have to have a discussion on what is "TRUTH"?
/r/MensRights08/04/24 05:49 AM
9

Diversity of opinion is important to help with more balanced perspectives. I am not against understanding the implications of an opinion. It is this diversity that can also highlight issues. The issue isn't women, it is using a feminist mindset, or looking to undermine topics due to a lack of understanding of its impacts.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 08:31 PM
11

There is an issue of perspective and intention. If the perspective is to shift it to how women are affected by the discussion, it changes and derails the focus. You can tell when there is a bit of frustration. He is just expressing frustration due to the situation. There does not need to be a challenge to that in this case.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 08:13 PM
5

I am married. When you are both mature enough to grow together. You trust that they will be with you through thick and thin, and able to resolve conflicts. Conflicts if it turns into a territorial dispute, rather than a problem to be resolved is an issue. You learn more about a person's character in the bad times. Marriage is an investment, make your choice wisely. If there is no trust, there is no relationship.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 08:51 PM
3

Don't watch it. But doubling the price could also backfire. Theory would be about elevated demand than what is actually occurring. It is more a fake demand rather than actual demand. The idea is people will spending more will more likely appreciate it. Use the richer people to drive the demand. Then use gate fees to increase the pay of the players.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 08:55 AM
5

Males to be resilient. Females to help bring others up. It actually sounds like a good partnership combining what has been suggested. Being resilient you can be knocked down when dealing with difficult issues. Being resilient does require help and support when you have been knocked down. Being able to support and bring others up, can help heal and rejuvenate. It is 2 sides of the same coin.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:39 AM
3

They also introduced a defence fund for the family court system under Howard. This was to help make things fair in family (womens) court. This was also scrapped under the Labor government. The defence fund was to help provide fair access to legal services. The removal of it means that only the support structure controlled by women's groups, and organisations that profit from this bias remain. Women's court in Australia is the only one that is run at a profit.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:20 AM
3

Some policies that were put in under the Howard government to help boys that were falling through the cracks, and scraped under the Gillard government?
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:07 AM
5

It could turn into a victimhood competition!
/r/MensRights03/04/24 11:48 PM
1

Immigration and birth rate decline will affect this macro economic argument.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 10:03 PM
9

There are several aspects here, ability to seek and receive support, bias when seeking help, discord between social expectations and ability to get help. If suicide attempts between males and females were the same, males have a much higher success rate. The reason females success rate is much lower is they do not go the lethal route, but use it more as an expression to say I need help and no one is listening. They now get the attention and get help. For males on the other hand, many deem they wi…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 01:19 PM
6

4g phones, being more connected that even. Bully became 24/7 and no escape.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 10:20 PM
9

Um, tell me what you have been drinking, so I know not to drink what your drinking. Your preaching insecurity!
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:45 AM
2

Is WGTOW a rebranding of 4B?
/r/MensRights02/04/24 01:24 AM
45

Many of them have been married multiple times. I guess it comes down to practice! Lol
/r/MensRights02/04/24 01:14 AM
1

I definitely had more than my share of dusters thrown at me, by male teachers, the cane or rulers over the knuckles by female teachers. Having alot of energy, ended up being distracted easy. There were many ways that could end up going, which included day dreaming(pondering other things rather than what is being taught). Extra energy does cause issues in method of education, and ability to get rid of that energy. I could have intense focus as well, so long as it was engaging, or there was someth…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:24 PM
2

Only if it is from someone they do not want the attention from.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 11:25 AM
3

You realise, 80's and 90's many girls attitudes was, flaunt it if you got it. If they wanted an ego boost, they would wear something a bit revealing, and get called sexy or wolf whistled. It was a form of flirting.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:27 AM
11

With the 1 child policy over in China, a female academic in China had proposed a woman should be allowed to have up to 2 husbands. The reason for this argument is the ratio of 116 boys to every 100 girls in society. This was based on ensuring all men had the opportunity to get married and be in a relationship. This was dismissed by the CCP.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:23 AM
3

It is the grass is greener philosophy. It might seems like a solution on the surface, but it is quite shallow.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 08:58 PM
-1

Not really, it is actually an attack of the male core, and one of our primary motivations. I see far more negative effects outside the hypothetical. To remove most of these directly affected aspects is then a bit loaded. You are now focused primarily on the social impact. Communication, flirting and boundaries will change due to such a context. This is a path of exploration, with unintended consequences. Feelings used for motivation are gone. Motivation is usually driven by emotions or feelings.…
/r/MensRights31/03/24 07:39 PM
2

The issue with this, is if you are able to suppress certain types of feelings it can also affect perception. If you used sexual desire, feelings and energy to help with self improvement. The loss of those feelings will most likely take away the desire for self improvement. In essence it will make you docile and numb in areas where you had used it to motivate yourself before. Another aspect is it could cause an issue with communication and flirting. The boundaries will shift, as the tension will …
/r/MensRights31/03/24 07:26 PM
3

FeMRA sub is for the much higher level discussions at an academic level. Feminist vs MRA discussion and debate. That is very tightly controlled, and at a much higher level than us common folk use.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 11:34 AM
8

I have challenged, but never insulted. Yes, there are guys here that are in pain, just like those in the feminist subs. I never mocked or insulted them due to their issues. The topics here tend to be more robust, and is less focused on victimhood. There are some here that use it as a form of reinforcement as an echo chamber. Getting banned is less likely, but it is more just the post gets deleted I guess.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 11:26 AM
9

I noticed it was an echo chamber. While it is kinda funny, some of them you have to feel sorry for. Pink is used to oppress women in this patriarchy.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 10:49 AM
15

I am talking about those that do not use the word patriarchy in every paragraph. I even said that I deem it is a form of ideology. Am not a feminist. We might agree on some things, but that does not make me a feminist. If you can accept differences, and agree to disagree on view points we can have a robust discussion. I think curiosity over war and women getting conscripted got me banned.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 10:31 AM
39

I got banned from there as well. All response for dating, they will only date/marry a feminist. Feminism is a value? They are a bit nuts, even the educated ones.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 10:24 AM
3

There is going to be contagion with that conflict. There are some other countries that now are doing the draft for women. The draft of women, and more hawkish military stance with many NATO members.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 06:44 AM
6

First off, that is blackmail. Talk to a lawyer, then go to the police. Keep all documentation of the messages! This is actually a scam, they are now using it to blackmail you.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 05:35 AM
7

Fairness is important, equality can be manipulated depending on the motivation. If you mean, everyone should be treated fairly and equally under the law. I fully agree with you. Feminism does have a way of radicalising vulnerable women. It is a way to provide community to those who feel hurt in one way or another. It also provides a target for that anger and rage that comes from that hurt. Deeper than that, Feminism is the marketing of victimhood. You can not have a proper discussion when the id…
/r/MensRights30/03/24 10:23 PM
1

A man might call a woman, fat and ugly, other women will call her big and beautiful. The positive way of saying things can be used as an insult, and saying you are not a threat to me by these nice words I am giving you.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 11:41 AM
7

Most of them spend more money than they make. For most of them it is a poor investment strategy.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 01:12 AM
5

If there are initiatives to get women into certain fields, should there be initiatives to get men into certain fields as well? The areas where there is a massive under representation of males in a field also has a strong negative social bias as well attached. For males to re-enter such fields will require more than initiatives, it will require reducing social biases in those fields which has legal ramifications just on a suggestion of impropriety.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:04 PM
3

3 countries now have conscription to include females. It is no surprise they are all located near Russia, and also have strong equal opportunity laws and a strong focus on equality.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:56 PM
4

Do you think having domestic violence shelters for men will reduce women dying in a home with DV? (If a victims only way out of a situation is to kill there partner, and there is no other options to leave or get support/help) A father will have no place to go or get help with a violent and abusive female partner. On top of that is social stigmas.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:38 PM
10

The classic high school girl mentality. Kick the person out of the circle till they are willing to conform. It is just a game they are playing with you. Focus on your thing and move forward. They will lose respect for you as a guy if doing the girl games to fit back in with the circle.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 08:05 PM
7

This is shallow, victimhood mentality, it doesn't focus on self reflection to improve. I think they have a distorted view of the world, enabled by a sense of victimhood.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 07:35 PM
3

I am no academic, but skimming through it there seemed a discord. It seems like using it as a blanket piece to cover its backside on its next political engagement forward. There is no misandry because it has helped males occasionally. This is creating an excuse for it exist while denying it.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 02:20 AM
23

Never heard of 4B before. Having a look at it is wow. It explains why South Korea has such a low birth rate and is shrinking. I don't think they thought what the impact is. A very destructive ideology. MGTOW does focus on personal improvement. There is a vast difference in scope and concept.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 01:52 AM
1

We will probably see more European countries mandate female conscription. Russia has now started to use the word WAR rather than Special Military Operation. Let's see how this will escalate.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 01:32 PM
2

Got banned from a couple of Feminist reddits for asking such current affairs topics. I guess they want equality, but the privileges of also being a protected class. I don't think they see protecting their country has any value either!
/r/MensRights23/03/24 01:24 PM
2

This can be the same argument used by both sides. It is a gaslighting move. The issue is the fair presentation of materials. Unconscious bias to make women victims does not help women, and the other way does not help men. Fairness is very important. With a small shift will help over a generation.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:05 PM
4

I would believe it can be very horrific. In many ways it can be very therapeutic to talk about experiences to others listen without fear of being judged. One of the things I would like to see is when DV awareness is discussed in school. The examples should not all portray males as the perpetrator and females as victims. This creates an unconscious bias. If it had 75% of males and 25% of women as perpetrators, this will shift the cultural awareness overtime. A shift like this will actually requir…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 10:41 PM
22

I will have to say I am lucky to be in a ltr and not have to worry about these shenanigans by a woman scorned. The character assassination is way over the top. The guy definitely dodged a bullet. Vindictiveness is not an attractive trait.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 10:12 PM
3

The Denmark PM is female! It can't be oppression of women.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:33 PM
1

So they will be assigned to back end and logistics roles? Women were very important in intelligence networks in WW1 and WW2. Just depends on how they are deployed. If you want to look at it another way, as the population at home declines, it will not be skewered. It will still maintain an even distribution.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:00 PM
1

There is pidgeonholing for sure, I think that is what actually turned me off of his podcasts.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 07:35 PM
5

Wasn't she the initiator of all those escapades?
/r/MensRights22/03/24 07:15 PM
2

A very interesting perspective. Will need to reread it a couple more times. The main issue is the dynamics are not clicking, and to try another approach.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 07:08 PM
2

In the DeadBedrooms there is a bit more than 50% of people complaining are women. It is mismatched libidos. The issue of telling her friends all the problems they are having is are issues of trust and respect.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 07:02 PM
2

The old school stuff.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:47 AM
1

I am not sure about your living circumstances. Owning a pet can be very good. Dog person myself. Establishing a connection with another living being is important. Emotional investment, and the responsibility of care of another living being. Pets can be very beneficial. A medium sized dog will require exercise. You start placing the interest of the dog ahead of your own. You take your dog to the dog park, and let him/her socialise. Being responsible for another creature will also help you to grow…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 04:55 AM
1

There are simpler solutions. Adjust domestic violence awareness in school to have more diverse examples, rather than example of men being the perpetrators and women being the victim. The current model actually creates unconscious bias For many decades, the media has only highlighted and pushed negative stories of males in the early education field. This also creates a negative perception bias. This negative perception bias needs to be dealt with. This will nudge the direction. It doesn't need ra…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 11:40 PM
5

In history, both men and women worked. The social media stuff is nothing more than clickbait. Use controversy to attract. Social media companies use this to provide you with more of the same content. This then reinforces your perception. It is called the echo chamber effect. Most people will either pay their own way, or split the bill in dating. Neither party wants to feel like they owe the other person something.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 12:41 PM
3

This is an awkward tangent, I don't know if going on such a macro scale will be conductive. I am not familiar with this territory either, except I will bring it into geo politics.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 09:40 AM
4

I don't live in the US. But I don't see emigration will be of scale to affect immigration. Economics will have a much greater impact.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 09:23 AM
3

The expectation to provide, or bring into the household. While I do not look at the home husbands reddit. Documentaries have highlighted issues that the home hubby should do more, and the wife doesn't want to be the sole provider. (The gist of the argument) In essence, it comes down to, he doesn't have a job, so he must be lazy. I am working and making money for us. There is a bit of negative emotion. In those Documentaries, you had to watch closely, but the women were undermining their male par…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 08:42 AM
6

When you have schools and departments of education pushing, covert only female can be victims and males abusers is dangerous. We have groups to push for more women in different areas of education and work life. Scholarships for women in underepresented fields. Yet as more women have greater access to various areas of life, men have massive disadvantages at various levels. Childcare and primary education are female dominated fields, males that move into those fields are usually met with distrust …
/r/MensRights21/03/24 08:26 AM
2

People are actually very understanding, and they will give you space to grieve.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:51 AM
15

I assume this does exist. The issue with it is, the woman will usually become unhappy with the arrangement and want the guy to take up employment and bring in an income. Or she will bring in another male into the relationship to be a bit more dominant towards her, and agreed level of humiliation towards the husband. These are the 2 most likely outcomes of the situation.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:46 AM
12

Men and women have usually worked together in different ways to grow a civilisation. It is those at the top that benefit from the growth. With growth, they required men at the bottom doing the more dangerous activities, which also reduced their life span. Women tended to have a longer life span, and yes, the women at the bottom had to work to survive as well. It is the message that only women had to suffer, and men controlled everything is destructive. This victimhood mentally is now a business.…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:39 AM
12

You definitely need help, a therapist, or a survivors group or something to let some of that pain out and heal. I had some pain things in my life I did bury deep, but only talked to my wife. Married 18 years when I had a breakdown, only person I could trust enough to talk to. I went down the denial route, and if things did resurface I will deal with it then. Make a short list of things you will want in a partner. This can take time, it goes much deeper than just writing. It is learning to unders…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:18 AM
1

Trust is a very rare commodity, and the deepest things will require the most trust. You need to know that they will not abuse that trust.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 07:15 AM
2

Good luck with it bro! Wish you much success with it.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:57 AM
2

As married men, we joke about it to stay sane. Lol
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:54 AM
1

The passport thing is a false premise. It is a grass is greener concept.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:48 AM
2

That comes with experience, and not letting lust control you.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:36 AM
1

Relationships do have their ups and downs. Some challenges can last more than a decade. If there isn't trust and some give and take. Yeah, in the comfortable camp here. There are going to be issues into the future, but they will be dealt with. Rough patches can be brutal!
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:35 AM
11

Is she supposed to be a therapist or counsellor or something? She is off her dial. Getting only people seeking help is not the average person doing the daily grind. BTW, thanks for the laugh
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:07 AM
1

I have had women come up and start talking, seeing a father with a couple of young kids/babies. Don't think it was flirting or anything. Could be wrong and missed social cues, because I was focused on my kids.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 01:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter