TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Strelock Archive

View 0 posts and 126 comments by Strelock on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I hope that for the ones that actually go through with it their relationships implode. As a side note, isn't not having promiscuous unprotected sex thinking "I can just have an abortion" exactly what the right has been telling women for generations? So, they are finally listening?
/r/MensRights07/11/24 10:18 PM
11

Due to her experience as a man during the making of Self-Made Man she ultimately had a depressive breakdown, leading Vincent to admit herself to a locked psychiatric facility
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:38 PM
9

Keep a first aid kit in your car with a barrier. Sure, you might not always be near enough to the car, but at least in those situations where you are you have PPE.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:32 PM
0

No. Common law marriages do exists, but it takes years and combined finances etc and isn't a thing at all in most states. Most of the laws say that the partners have to consider themselves married, like you call the other person your husband/wife etc.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 02:42 PM
2

Gross. EDIT: Here in the USA age of consent has nothing to do with teacher on student abuse. The teacher is in a position of power and thus it's a crime even if the student were 18.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:55 PM
1

It's as high as 10% of kids are abused or harassed by teachers or faculty according to the department of ed. The Scouts got drug through the mud and crucified for MUCH lower rates of abuse, but the schools get a free pass.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:54 PM
1

Not enough time, but at least she didn't get probation like many of these freaks.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:50 PM
9

They are simping. They think that their support will get them laid.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 01:14 AM
2

I don't really care on that issue either way, there are more important problems to solve. But it's not an elective surgery for the child.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 01:14 AM
3

One of the problems with lefties (more so far lefties) is they all think they are or will be one of the elites. They think that somehow they won't be the ones given the shovel and told where to dig the mass graves.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 04:22 PM
1

Do you shoot the child or die to the bomb that their religious leader has strapped to their chest? That's the scenario the person you are replying to has alluded to. Convoy drivers in Iraq and Afghanistan were under orders to not stop for anything, including children, because monsters were using them to get the trucks to stop over IEDs. It resulted in children dying and major PTSD for those men that had to choose between a child's life and their own. I know a man that came home after having to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:58 PM
1

Yeah, see I am thinking that they would create some system where it's mandatory to submit DNA ID data along with say the social security application.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 07:23 PM
6

our society is not concerned with the bodily integrity and rights of babies Sadly you are correct there. The ATF has been caught with illegally keeping records of firearms purchases, not tinfoil at all. Warrantless wiretapping etc was all exposed to be absolutely real by numerous whistleblowers, and I'm sure that's just the beginning of what they have done and are capable of doing.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:11 PM
1

It isn't now, but I guarantee you that the government will find it hard to resist forcing healthcare providers to make that identification data available to them.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:42 PM
2

I don't think it should be mandatory for every birth, but I do think it should be mandatory if the father asks for it. In other words, I don't think that the mother gets to refuse or fight it in court. If the Dad listed on the birth certificate (or not listed but mom later wants to collect child support) wants a DNA test done, it's automatically done. A few of us men are secure in our partners and don't worry about that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:33 PM
1

At least when our last child was still in the womb it was an optional procedure, even if we had risk factors it was still optional.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:28 PM
1

Yes, but at least 8 years ago when my wife was last pregnant it was optional. There is some risk collecting a DNA sample from the unborn child to do that screening (at least that's what we were told) since they are piercing the womb to draw some amniotic fluid. My worry is that if DNA screening is made mandatory that there will be a clause that stipulates that the government gets a copy of the data to use for future identification of the child and parents for possible prosecution.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:27 PM
5

The right to not have their DNA involuntarily entered into the system, cause you know they aren't going to just delete that data once they have it. "Just think of all the crime we could solve in 20 years!"
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:14 PM
75

Yup. They didn't want the help sleeping with their wives, daughters, and concubines. But they wanted strong male bodies to defend their palaces. Solution? Cut their junk off.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 04:10 PM
0

That's the draft, not the same as voluntarily signing up.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:00 PM
3

They want a job and that one lets them retire at 40.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 03:38 PM
1

Ok, so what does it mean? As I stated, I am not a lawyer.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 02:55 PM
9

I guess, but in no fault states the courts are not supposed to take the behavior of the person at fault into consideration when determining alimony or division of property. They still do for parenting time though. I am not a lawyer.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:05 AM
0

While this may be, it still doesn't change what her sentence is.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 01:01 AM
3

It is. She got life with the possibility of parole after 15 years. Hopefully the judge in 15 years is not a raging feminist.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 10:45 PM
1

This is incorrect. She got life, with the possibility of parole no sooner than 15 years.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 10:44 PM
2

Oh yeah, but it was an online class so it was OK.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 07:48 AM
2

Yeah, we were a little different. We waited till we were married.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:00 AM
13

I had other kids at my high school call me a pedo because I was dating a freshman as a junior. No one ever said anything to the girls in my class that were dating freshman guys. I'm now married 15 years to that same girl I was dating way back when, been together more than 20 years now. Those awful bitches need to mind their own damn business.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:48 AM
-2

Well, I guess that's one point for Commiefornia. Doesn't even tip the scales for me though.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 06:01 AM
10

He should wait until he starts with a new team, or until it's obvious his career is over.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:59 AM
1

Similar thing happened to me. It was a female park ranger, and she called my girlfriend's (now wife's) mom. Made us get out of the car and took her aside and asked her all sorts of questions about who I was and our relationship. Obviously trying to get her to say I was SAing her. We weren't even doing anything, just talking. We were good kids and didn't have relations until we got married. It was so embarrassing having to take her home, but she let us go. It was after curfew, I had no idea that …
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:54 PM
4

He was raped. A sexual relationship between a student and teacher is not legal. The teacher was not legally able to get consent to have sex with a student.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 04:42 PM
7

That's why we have the law to decide that he's a victim. It should absolutely be illegal for someone in a position of power over a minor to use that power to rape them. The age of consent doesn't matter, teachers should not ever be having sex with their students. Even at 18.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 09:40 PM
21

Age of consent doesn't matter in many states when it is a teacher - student relation. Even when that student is above 18, and even if it's in a college setting, in many states it's still illegal. It's about the power dynamics that the educator holds over the student.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 09:36 PM
1

My wife complains all the time about her chores. We both work full time. We have it set up where I do all the vehicle, home maintenance, house "IT" stuff, yard work, and the like. She does all the cleaning (of shared spaces), laundry, most of the cooking (in summers I take over the proteins, she won't use the grill), and childcare after school till I get home (about an hour). Yet she's constantly complaining about the laundry, cooking, and the crazy kids. She hates bathing the 5 year old, so I u…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:40 AM
5

Yes, but sometimes even when they get upset with you it can put the idea in their head that their life could be better. That idea may grow, and they may eventually act on it. If he's happy with where he's at, then I'd ignore it. But if he's not, at least think about saying something.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:25 AM
3

How would you know for sure though unless you were a fly on the wall in their home? You have no idea what your friends relationships are like unless they tell you, and even then it could all be a lie. Most people don't like to air their dirty laundry in public.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:19 AM
9

Meanwhile our current alzheimers patient in chief eulogized one.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 05:14 PM
1

Classical liberalism and leftism are completely different things, and how you crazies co opted the term liberal to describe yourselves completely escapes me.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 02:36 PM
2

Only the DA can press charges, bud. He can try and sue her, but what is he gonna get out of it? Doubtful that she has any assets to take. And it's going to cost him, both monetarily and emotionally. Maybe the way his dad can hope to get some forgiveness is by paying that legal bill?
/r/MensRights21/10/22 10:47 PM
11

Leave his daughter outside of the bathroom alone with a stranger, obviously. /s if you didn't know.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 05:02 PM
19

"Hey gals, I've got this great idea! Let's stop having sex with men! The conservatives will hate it!" Conservative: "We've been telling you to engage in abstinence for years instead of killing children, and you're finally listening! Good job!"
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:43 PM
17

This is a bad take. Plenty of women worked in places that were downright dangerous. Places like textile mills etc. Even children.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 01:57 AM
15

But it shouldn’t cost her her job much less her career, especially since she apologised! I would agree except anyone who disagrees with her politically (as in, not on the left) would lose their job and possibly career for the same comment even after multiple apologies.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 05:08 PM
3

Or just waiting for her to come home from work and say she's withholding intimacy due to politics so that he has one more reason to leave.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:00 PM
1

Have fun unborn /u/whatwhatinthebutt456 lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wz1ca1-_-MY I'm sure the rocking motion was fun for you!
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:31 AM
1

Thanks little darlin', but I used spell check.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:10 AM
3

So your parents were abstinent for 9 months? Doubtful.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:58 AM
2

It's because of this that people are going to simply stop going to these failed centers of indoctrination. One could only hope.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 11:42 PM
1

She wasn't charged with rape though. https://www.legis.iowa.gov/DOCS/ACO/IC/LINC/Section.709.15.pdf
/r/MensRights23/08/21 04:52 AM
0

Yup, here she is: https://www.iowasexoffender.gov/registrant/20937/MARY-HAGLIN-IOWA/?lastname=Haglin&alias=1&type=simple EDIT: And if you look at the map, she's a block from a middle school.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 04:49 AM
18

Doesn't matter in many places if 17 is underage or not, their relationship as student and teacher still makes it illegal.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 04:43 AM
1

Really? ABC7 is in California I thought.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 03:47 PM
1

Good to know, thanks.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 03:25 PM
1

I'm actually not sure that's the case. Straight white male isn't a protected class, so it's probably perfectly fine. Definitely unethical though. IANAL.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 12:37 AM
1

I'm actually not sure that's the case. Straight white male isn't a protected class, so it's probably perfectly fine. Definitely unethical though. IANAL.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 12:35 AM
1

Maybe the admins allowed it because they thought she needed to be ripped a new one?
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:55 AM
3

Yes, we do terminate once it gets to the levels he's talking about. Edit: Specifically, Alaska, Colorado, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Vermont, and Virginia all allow abortion with no time limit. And many states also have a law that states they are allowed up to any point if the health of the mother is at risk, but don't specify beyond that what exactly the risk or type of health (mental, physical, financial) needs to be.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 05:22 AM
1

A hospital is on fire. Left inside is a small child with a broken arm and a terminal cancer patient with 2 weeks to live. Your test tube embryos are terminal cancer patients with 2 weeks to live.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:22 PM
3

She said that some men chose to pay above the man tax and that the money above the man tax went to "charity". At least, that's how I read it. They kept the 18% but some paid more than 18% and that got "donated".
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:01 PM
1

But then your child gets to stay with it's mother instead of being trafficked. Still a win. I'll take life knowing that my child is safe over being free any day. And that's if what you're saying is even remotely a possibility. It's not. Especially in the situation above where the store has cameras. DNA testing proves who the child belongs to. Etc. Not responding with lethal force could mean your child becomes someone's sex slave until they are too used up and coked out to continue living. Could …
/r/MensRights14/01/19 02:31 PM
1

Plus considering in the referenced story the child was in a carrier so was likely by the woman's side below her waist. Plenty of room for a center of mass shot while still being a couple of feet from the child.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 02:25 PM
1

Don't forget the people kicking you in the ribs. While I'm sure they are thinking they are on the side of good, they are assaulting you without knowing the truth of the situation. It would probably end badly for me, but if I were in that situation I don't care who gets shot if it saves my kid.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 02:22 PM
2

Or trafficked.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:51 PM
3

I've heard of hospitals having to transport patients to veterinary facilities meant for large animals like killer whales (Sea World) because they have an MRI machine big enough to fit the fat person through.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:13 PM
1

Yes, youtube red is a subscription. But the money supposedly gets split amongst the people that I watch. I mean, I guess all money is green and all that, but according to youtube they use your watched hours to decide who your subscription fee goes to support. I just pay it because I hate ads, honestly. Plus it comes with Play Music which I use in the car and at work.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 10:53 PM
1

Cost of what subscription? Subscribing to a youtube channel is free. Maybe you're thinking of twitch or patreon?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 03:46 AM
2

Maybe a couple, but mostly car shows and tech channels, like Mighty Car Mods, LGR, Mustie1, 8-bit Guy, etc. Every great once in a while I will get trapped in a series of Ben Shapiro videos, but I hardly ever watch political or news related stuff on Youtube. Sometimes gun videos I guess. But I really try to avoid politics on Youtube as it's not what I'm there for. I'm not trying to get all riled up and pissed right before bed, I'm trying to relax.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:17 PM
5

How YouTube Red supports creators Creators are the heart and soul of YouTube. To ensure they're compensated for their work, we share ad revenue with them when you watch ads on YouTube. If you're a YouTube Red member, you won't see ads, so we share your monthly membership fee with creators. Best of all, the more videos you watch from your favorite creators, the more money they make. I don't watch these lunatics, so try again.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:20 PM
1

Oops, thought the post I was replying to was referring to ads. Every time I see PSA I think of "The More You Know" which was always ran as a commercial back in the day. So I was thinking ads. Honestly, I've never seen any of these PSA's that are being referred to since I tend to stick to the people I am subscribed to and none of them ever really get political.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:16 PM
-19

I'm so glad I pay for Red so I don't have to see this shit.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:59 PM
2

Would it be to far if she had said "You don't understand because you're a black man" if the man asking the question was black? What if she were a man and had said to a woman that it's because the question asker was a straight white woman?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:45 PM
2

According to conventional wisdom, if one consumes one drink per hour then they are generally safe to drive. Not drunk, so to speak. The time frame here 9PM to about 12:30 AM, so 3 1/2 hours. She consumed a large bottle of beer (1.5 drinks?), a pint (2.5), half a bottle of prosecco (roughly 3 glasses so 5.5) and another beer (6.5 drinks total). So, I think it's safe to say she was pretty drunk. Not a little tipsy, but probably pretty drunk. She made the decision to have sex with him after feeling…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 10:39 PM
-5

Sure, I get it. But by the same token some men expect their wives to have a full dinner cooked and the house cleaned every night after both of them spent all day at work. It's a give and take in any relationship, and I'm sure this woman was frustrated at her husband for in her eyes choosing to not be around. I could see how that would make someone angry. Sure yelling at him was not called for but I can't really hold her responsible for what happened to him. Emotions can get the best of you in th…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:15 PM
-7

10-12 hours working from home in no way compares to what this man went through. Sorry dude.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:01 PM
1

It's a decent amount, probably on the low end but it's certainly enough if you've planned it out. Consider your house is paid for, you may not have a car payment, and your getting social security plus possibly a pension. Consider also if you can live off your pension and social security and manage to not touch the $300,000 that it will make you a few thousand per year just in an average savings account. Even more if you stick most of it in CDs and just leave $10,000 or so in savings for emergenc…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:02 AM
2

Did the cops show up before or after the crowd separate you from your daughter? God damn, if a random mob separated my from my son I'm not sure I would be able to keep my cool. It would certainly require some explaining and whatever lawyers I could afford because I would most certainly not put up with that shit. I don't know if I would feel the need to draw my weapon but I wonder if people taking your kid away from you would be justification? I mean, you would most certainly be in fear for their…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:06 PM
1

such as the perpetrator being the prophet Mohammed. Yes, with his new 5 year old wife.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:01 AM
2

So in Canada if someone breaks into my home while I am obviously there it is a mistake to fear for my life and act accordingly? Things seem pretty fucked in the Northlands, eh?
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:58 AM
14

Because when you're accused of rape you're automatically guilty.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 06:43 AM
1

Yeah, you definitely don't want to be front hugging minors with a name like drippydick.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:13 AM
0

You said anyone who's been to prison. The word anyone includes, well, ANYONE. I didn't put any words in your mouth you didn't already say. And what's with the name calling? You wanna talk about class... So, then how about firearm ownership? Should someone with multiple firearms related convictions be allowed to own guns after getting out? There are many felonies I would agree with you on, but I don't think it should just "disappear". There should certainly be some time frame attached to it once …
/r/MensRights25/01/17 08:35 PM
0

The concept of a felony after prison should disappear, since it's effectively a scarlet letter for life on anyone who's been to prison. Right, so according to you we should totally hire pedophile rapists as teachers once they get out.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:41 AM
1

LOL, no I don't support segregation. You're obviously reading between the lines instead of reading my actual words. Have a nice day!
/r/MensRights07/10/16 10:55 PM
1

This woman is not Rosa Parks. The airline has the right to move your seat for any reason they seem fit. Rosa Parks was supposed to sit on a different part of the bus because segregation was LAW at the time. Sure the airline had a shitty reason, but I'm sure they though moving the white woman who was flying alone would be a much nicer solution than making her sit next to those animals, or trying to move 2 or more people to make the mooslems happy.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:06 PM
1

I mean, I can certainly see your point as a "principle of the matter" sort of thing, but it's not like she even got on the plane before she was reassigned. She was given the new seating assignment before ever having to sit down and settle in. I believe the only reason this is news or even remotely upsetting was she was told the truth about why she was moved. All they should have said was that her seat was moved. I'm sorry, but getting an equivalent seat somewhere else on the plane that gets you …
/r/MensRights06/10/16 01:49 PM
2

Hey, I agree with the sentiment in your first statement. Flip it around though. Maybe the airline thought they were doing her a favor by moving her away from people who would obviously have an issue with her very being? Maybe the airline thinks the black man would appreciate being sat next to someone who won't call him "nigger" the whole flight?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:29 PM
2

Is it really a "very real" inconvenience to be asked to sit somewhere else on a plane when you are flying alone? I mean really? Why? Maybe she's just beefed they didn't upgrade her to first class as well!
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:27 PM
-1

Maybe they did request to be moved but due to the seating arrangement on the plane there would have been more people moved around to have 2 seats next to each other or even 2 separate seats with no women next to them? Instead of hearing about a religious discrimination incident we are hearing about a sex discrimination incident because the airline moved her instead of 2 respectable mooslems. Hell, I would rather have been moved than sit next to them if given the choice. I have nothing against Is…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:26 PM
-3

I don't understand what this bitch is going on about. It's not like she picked that seat to sit next to some family member. Just get on the damn plane and get on with your life. She's acting like a 12 year old entitled brat.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 04:42 PM
2

Yeah Mom, just stand there in the corner and pretend not to be here. I just want a witness in case this girl decides later I raped her. /s
/r/MensRights19/09/16 11:50 PM
3

So he'll spend all his time fighting for fathers rights while his running mate talks about military style 5 round clipazines? Great... at least half of that statement I can get behind.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 06:06 AM
1

Well, they want equality so... give it to em I say!
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:21 AM
4

He's absolutely right and his position is consistent with his Libertarian Party affiliation. Libertarians believe that anything between consenting adults is fine, so I do believe you, and him, are incorrect.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 02:56 AM
9

Did I call you a criminal? I mean it's pretty obvious you can read, but maybe you have issues with comprehension.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:14 PM
12

They start fucking other kids at 13 and 14... getting molested by your teacher is pretty different than clumsily fumbling around with Sally under the bleachers at an away game.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 07:50 PM
4

Silly me to use an accepted definition for an acronym http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=MRA EDIT: There's even a subreddit in the sidebar here called /r/MRActivism
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:26 PM
3

Seeking out information does not equal being an activist. The root of the word is "act" after all...
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:11 PM
11

Is there really such a thing as a moderate activist?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:48 PM
3

It was a phone meeting, so was it recorded?
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:24 PM
0

So under your definition the mother also babysits since the kid goes till school or daycare while she is at work
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:39 PM
1

"My argument is, if a 12-year-old is capable of rape, why are the professionals not asking questions about the family life? It is not normal." Wait, so she wanted the British version of CPS to take her son?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:25 PM
1

No let the police bring violence into it.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:17 AM
2

European men deserve the blame for allowing their rights to be taken away to such a point where their fellow citizens are criminals for inflicting harm on an attacker when trying to defend themselves. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3418751/Danish-17-year-old-girl-used-pepper-spray-fight-rapist-near-migrant-asylum-centre-told-prosecuted-carrying-weapon.html#ixzz3ypo0mvCg
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:04 PM
1

I just meant so the court can't collect.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:00 AM
5

Fucking move. Become Canadian or Mexican.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:35 PM
1

(a.2) Schools Except as provided in sections 3121, 3122.1, 3123, 3124.1 and 3125, a person who is a volunteer or an employee of a school or any other person who has direct contact with a student at a school commits a felony of the third degree when he engages in sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse or indecent contact with a student of the school. As used in this subsection, the following terms shall have the meanings given to them in this paragraph: (i)"Direct contact" - Care, supervi…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:17 PM
1

Let me make it clear for you, no one cares if feminists ignore men's issues. Feminists blame all men's issues on "toxic masculinity" and "patriarchy", which if gender-reversed, would be like saying, "We can help women, just listen, if women stop acting like sluts and gold-diggers, then they won't get raped or beat up." Which is not only idiotic, but insulting. So, brush up on your history and facts on what domestic violence is and how it became what it is today. Start with Erin Pizzey, Harriot H…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 05:22 PM
0

Snowden doesn't have anything to do with it, I never said he did. I said that the invasion of privacy you are advocating for in a form of providing all receipts and proofs of where the monies went is in a way similar to the invasion of privacy he made us aware of. You're the one bitching about $4k for 2 kids as if it were an insane amount of money and then naming stores that someone should not be allowed to shop and purchase products from if they have children on child support. And why shouldn't…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:38 AM
0

No, I get it. $4k a month on child support would generally point to a family that earned much more than that before the divorce. I'm not saying it's a perfect system, but the point is not to provide just for basic necessities, but also a level of living similar to that before the divorce. I'm not saying that every situation is the same, or that it's right, but if you make $10k per month and initiate a divorce, don't bitch about paying out afterwards. Prior to the divorce your kids would have had…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 04:51 AM
0

Bullshit. I for one would not want to be accountable to some burocrat for every dollar I spent. Because that's what it would have to be, every receipt for the month not just the ones spent on the child. What people don't seem to get is that child support adds to the income level of the single parent. This means that essentially you now have $X to spend somewhere else in your budget. So if I can show $300 in receipts in relation to the child (assuming $300 is the support amount), then that means …
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:30 PM
0

This guy is right. It's ridiculous to think that someone receiving child support can show that they have only spent that money on the child. For example, if you get $300 a month in support, wouldn't that mean you don't have to spend $300 of your own income on the child? So, if you spend more money on yourself or on other non child related things, it's only because you are receiving the child support. All the money you get goes into a budget, and realistically tracking which dollar came from wher…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:17 PM
1

It's hard to even say the soldiers were the main victims, seeing the atrocities committed by the Nazis
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:33 PM
29

They sign them up at 17, and treat them for PTSD by 19.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:32 PM
1

They think adults in college are still children in grade school and can't be trusted to make adult decisions.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:19 PM
1

I agree. All this does is provide a piece of paper saying that "It was this guy see look I have his signature he raped me!"
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:17 PM
9

http://img3.owned.com/media/images/1/8/2/8/18287/sarah_jessica_parker_on_her_way_to_the_track_big.jpg
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:41 PM
9

They're learning it at school.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:46 PM
1

Not really, just saying it's not a punishment since who's to say they were going back after graduation anyways.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:06 PM
0

Allowed to graduate but never return to the school? Sounds like that's kinda the normal thing to do, isn't it?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:29 PM
3

Men are only 2/3 of a person for census purposes.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:45 PM
8

I agree. He should have moved whatever money he had left after the divorce overseas, bought a plane ticket, and disappeared.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:29 PM
0

Or take them and try and raise them as her own, since she couldn't conceive.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:01 PM
4

Muriatic acid.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 01:11 AM
1

Pool chemicals
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter