~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Are we all coders/progammers (logical thinkers)?Plus, women like to talk Biased selection. It is just that only those women that like to talk would come and stay with you, if all that you offer is listening. And counteraction is just the usual: Admit the existence of the problem. Discern the nature of the problem. Understand the source of the problem. Resolve the problem at its source. In case of negative self-image produced under the influence of common stereotypes - identify the particular stereotypes, figure out why and how they were forme… | /r/seduction | 21/10/20 10:29 PM |
| 1 | Are we all coders/progammers (logical thinkers)?I agree, to a large degree, with your last comment about social conditioning. Then the counteraction to this should be obvious to you by now. Can you tell what it is? less talk tends to work better It is just a case of "if you cannot do it right - better not do it at all". Listening is a skill too, albeit an easier one to acquire. But success of using it hinges of the willingness of another party to do the talking, since you are completely giving away the initiative and control over the situatio… | /r/seduction | 21/10/20 12:46 AM |
| 1 | Are we all coders/progammers (logical thinkers)?The fact remains, intellectual conversation is hardly an aphrodisiac. Poorly handled conversation is hardly an aphrodisiac, intellectual or not. But, I find quantum physics doesn't make pussy wet. And unless you yourself are a proud pussy-bearer - I do not see how you can claim this =) Rhetoric is a skill, after all. Not being able to present your content in a form appropriate for your audience shows that you are lacking this particular skill, not that this has any connection to being "smart guy… | /r/seduction | 21/10/20 12:19 AM |
| 2 | Are we all coders/progammers (logical thinkers)?They probably accept their fate. I could be wrong though Do you even realise how many programmers (and more generally - "IT-guys": QA, support and all that) are employed by "financial institutions" nowadays? =) Scientists can't get laid Theoretically - they can. Practically - they are usually too busy and more interested in whatever science they are doing now than in those boring human females. It does appear that the more logical your work is, the harder it gets. (that's what she said!) Or, it … | /r/seduction | 20/10/20 09:40 PM |
| 1 | Attraction is not created by what you logically say but instead by what you emotionally convey. This is why intelligent technically minded people often fail at casual conversation.Not only that. "Stupid people" is the one group that outnumbers any other group both on Reddit and among humans in general. | /r/seduction | 20/10/20 08:16 PM |
| 1 | Attraction is not created by what you logically say but instead by what you emotionally convey. This is why intelligent technically minded people often fail at casual conversation.This is not only untrue, but also unjust towards intelligent people. technically minded people often fail at casual conversation "Casual conversation" with whom? And also do you have any statistics to prove this assertion? Attraction (either generic or romantic) is not created by what you logically say but instead by what you emotionally convey. That is both false and an overgeneralisation. It is false, because attraction is created towards something that a person in question desires right now. … | /r/seduction | 20/10/20 08:13 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter