It's like the survivor bias of millionaires who made their business a success and tells you through a 10 minute ted talk to just live your passion and tough it out. the markets are littered with bodies of the failed and fallen.
So now the discussion shifted to average vs median. But take or example a restaurant. 5 cooks 5 waiter 1 manager 1 owner. the average might be above 50% if the owner makes a million dollars. But there's no way median can be above 50 unless the waiter and cook makes more than the manager and owner.
I am not making it out to be the most pressing issue men faces. The issue is more of how you're dimissing it as an issue at all. And you mean bleeding would hinder a woman to serve in the army? Surely you can understand the whole affair of war is about causing bleeding; Women would not be a stranger in that department I guarantee you. Compared to communal shitting in a hand dug trench, frostbites, shellshock, I'm pretty sure whatever you suffer during menstruating pales to what a frontline comba…
I am glad you find my argument worthy enough for you to mimic. But the root of it still stems from genetics and for that men get ridiculed by the other sex. You can diminish the argument in your mind because you're a woman. Though that also diminishes with balding woman feels and is made to feel? You are on nobody's side when you dismiss hair loss as just vanity. Vanity is a social construct and humans are social creatures. There is a real and tangible effect of being laughed at for not being op…
It is not conflating. It is recognizing both are valid points of view and your diminishment of an actual social hurdle men faces does not help your feminist team at all. there's no opt out for losing hair also. No opting out of women looking down at bald men also. I am showing you a different perspective. Menstruation is not created by the patriarchy; it's just how it is. So either suck it up and stop using it for sympathy pandering or do something useful like push for free tampons. No matter ho…
Being born pretty is just another advantage you need to hone to make useful. Being pretty and working hard to become a lawyer or doctor will go a long way to raising your status. But clinging onto looks and not hitting the books is the story of regret for many beautiful people.
You are saying that success is finding long term relationship. that's not a visual attribute. If you a pretty girl attracts a pretty boy, then there's an argument for and against. but pretty girls gets it harder to find long term relationships could stem from a basket of factors.
I think if there is no war, men should get a free gym membership. perhaps everyone should too. but if we were to be preferential to men in their physical attributes when it comes to warfaring then we can give them some encouragement.
I think as the modes of war change, the gender imbalance is leveled out. Like all the code breakers in WWII or spies, and probably female hackers in this ukranian war. If you need to drone strike your enemy to death then anyone can do it. If you need to dig a trench in permafrost, you'd want the burly russian guy.
Your second sentence is close to what I've been trying to get at except the way you worded it contradicts itself. Weren't you arguing to have standards to avoid shitty partners? Unless you meant to just get any shitty partner by not having any standards to avoid loneliness. Standards are relative to attraction. If you're a 7 guy, you can attract a 3 girl. This is the core to pretty much this sub and all similar subs is that a guy that's 10 can maybe get a 7 women. Any higher, and it's a crapshoo…
Again, I must emphasize as above, women can afford to have standards and still have a good chance at a relationship. Men will most likely die single if they cling onto this luxury of standards you so take for granted.
It is many people's ideal and want to have a happy relationship. humans are social beings and being single is lonely, and that motivates them to seek out others. If you are happy being single then you are part of the minority. And if you are part of the majority, how fun is it for you that you cannot form any relationship unless you must be forced to lower your standards?
You're not even understanding the problem here. Men are not even allowed to have standards. If they have any standards above trash hoes they need to be a lawyer with a side job inventing time machines. whereas women can set any standard if they are a 6 and above.
You're just listing more and more requirements men must meet it's the most natural and easiest thing. The same dumbass blond can just put on a v neck and find 10 dates before reaching the end of the block. No grammar needed I guarantee you.
wtf is the premise of this article? Finally women outnumber men in higher education but instead of celebrating she's complaining how there's no enough dating targets? Get your degree, get a job, and get over yourself.
In very small amounts. Compare that with everything commercially deep fried that uses transfat because it make the oil last longer or most packaged highly processed foods for longer shelflife.
What if the guy wasn't meaning to get his dick blown but literally asking how's her work going? Then that would still be sex talk. That's the bind she's in.
No wait, wait. She is looking for hookups but under it says "if you're just looking for fun." So, the answer is simply hookup and expect no fun. Probably involves something german style. Probably involves a drive thru marriage. Probably involves more kids. Hooking up is fine, just keep your expectations really really low.
Why would she use whatever is on the internet as a bar for what happens in real life? The internet have existed long enough now that she should know people online have no bearing to what they are offline.
