TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Strkszone Archive

View 0 posts and 69 comments by Strkszone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

All love has conditions when it comes to the extremes. Person you love murdered someone else you loved. That is a condition. The only unconditional love comes from jesus man who doesnt care if you raped 500 women and still loves you just the same.
/r/ExRedPill13/10/23 11:17 PM
0

I wouldnt date someone I am married thanks. No longer in the dating game. You can say that I am super insecure, and you are probably right. That is probably what drives me to be the best I can possibly be. I dont really know what it is personally because I do not really worry about that type of girl leaving me for another man since I wouldnt really care about her to begin with. Id ask questions and feign indifference to it until I found out. All I know is the minute I find out, I will feel this …
/r/ExRedPill13/10/23 11:08 PM
0

So I would be a predator because I do not want to be with someone who has very low sexual temperance and has different values than me? Is it predatory to expect someone to be in a monogamous relationship as well? Also I am atheist. I still care. Maybe I am insecure? Who knows. But I would prefer someone who wasnt sleeping around if I was to commit to them long term. Thankfully I dont have to worry about that. Big yikes for shaming people on preference. I also wont date certain people based on th…
/r/ExRedPill13/10/23 11:10 AM
1

And I just said that it is purely speculation on my part which means I concede it isnt based on fact? There is a reason why red pill content has a huge following and people are more likely to be honest when they are anonymous. There is a reason why the whole subject is very taboo as well. If there was nothing that the majority of people believe is negative, then they would be bragging about their sexual prowess. I think this alone is enough for me to speculate that hey maybe a lot of other guys …
/r/ExRedPill13/10/23 10:45 AM
-5

Why is it predatory? There are some women out there that dont sleep around over the age of 18 and take their chastity very seriously even outside of religious circles.
/r/ExRedPill13/10/23 10:41 AM
1

Use whatever analogy makes you feel better. You can use a person’s past to make an informed judgement about someone’s character. Someone with a low credit score is more likely to not pay back what they owe. Someone with a domestic violence/previous abusers are more likely to still have unresolved issues that make them act aggressively again. Someone who has a history of sleeping around may not be someone who takes relationships as seriously as someone who doesn’t. People will make judgments base…
/r/ExRedPill13/10/23 10:39 AM
1

Yeah and I think it changes right. I dont think that many guys are dying as virgins. Statistics only give us a snapshot in time. Like the amount of guys dying as a virgin seems to be less than 2%. So it means most guys get laid at some point it is more of a question about “when” and “how often” which is subject to speculation. Rememer trp also says that men dont like “hoes” and “women in their 30s” and “single mothers” but that doesnt mean they dont have sex/settle down or have kids either. Trp …
/r/ExRedPill13/10/23 03:56 AM
6

There seems to be some divide over this because I have seen plenty of TRP guys say not to waste your time and move onto someone who is interested. And yeah ive seen the pick up artist guys say to keep chasing (and more confusingly women saying that they can “still be manipulated” into liking you) as shown on another tiktok.
/r/ExRedPill12/10/23 05:05 AM
1

Do women hook up with college guys? Yes. It is known as hook up culture. Do they need to be rich? No. TRP sometimes seems to make it look like money is all that matters to sleep with women, when in actuality it is like you said the confidence, competence, taking care of yourself, and staying in shape. That said, the people with money are usually better able to do this than people without. Thats why they cote the stat of 1 in 3 men between ages 18-30 are virgins or sexless for over a year. Thats …
/r/ExRedPill11/10/23 05:08 AM
1

Yeah, I figured as much, but I just wanted to point out that your lived experience may not necessarily be a sufficient counter to that point because of the fact that the point is very ambiguous and “unknowable” so to speak. You often see these red pill guys counter “I had long term relationships as a promiscuous woman” with “and where are they now?” And it is funny because they dont really define “long term relationships” and if they fail for any reason it is because your past limited you from g…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/23 11:14 PM
1

The TRP narrative is that your body count will not affect your ability to pull guys for a short term relationship. It only affects long term. And the men that you are able to pull long term will be “lower quality” compared to the HVM spectrum. So the question you should be asking is whether or not these men who “are not insecure” genuinely aren’t insecure or are just pretending not to be as a cope because they have no other options anyway and had to “settle” for a promiscuous woman. And thats th…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/23 10:54 PM
1

What are the analogous male insecurities from your perspective?
/r/ExRedPill10/10/23 10:43 PM
1

Totally valid. The TRP argument is that even though these men are only this top 1% that is where the standards of the vast majority of women are due to “hypergamy” right? So they think that because they can attract men like this for sex (even in their 40s) they can get a commitment out of them too. So if this is the case, it would be relevant to female mating preferences, just not actual female commitment practices (not enough of those guys to go around). My point is that this usually isnt the c…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/23 10:38 PM
1

HVM is pretty difficult to definitively define because attraction traits will vary and high value for one may be different to the other but in general we can say tall, athletic, strong, competent, decisive, disciplined, responsible, wealthy, attractive face, confident, etc I share the same position as you. I am all about evaluating each component rather than going off blanket labels and generalisations. All I am saying is that a lot of women probably value the long term commitment side of things…
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 09:34 PM
0

I feel like the women here would honestly prefer it if I said I preferred honest and transparent polyamory. They would be like “well I dont get it and it isnt for me, but you do you” whereas because they cant change their count they may feel judged for it. I do not think your count affects how you are as a person, but it does tell me about your core values, what you likely think about sex, and nature. I do not share those values and I would not find it condicive to a long term committed relation…
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 08:38 PM
0

The manosphere/TRP content doesn't say that men find women in their 40s or single mothers undesirable. A lot of them say that guys always feel like having variety and "strange sex". It says that guys will just manipulate and use them for "recreational use only" and the only ones willing to commit will be "lower value men". So you finding 40 year old women sexually attractive isn't really contradicting anything. MILF is a highly searched porn category for a reason. Attraction isn't the same as re…
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 02:58 PM
-5

What about them exactly do you find desirable? Because we are trying to differentiate between lust and actual commitment here. Her husband is basically telling her that since she is a single mom in her 30s men are less likely to commit to her and the ones that would be willing to commit to her would be of a lower quality than she would be attracted to in the first place. There is a difference between sexual desire and desire to commit to a woman, so you will need to identify what exactly someone…
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 01:26 PM
-4

Tell me you didn't read the full comment without telling me you didn't read the full comment. I also compared credit card debt to number of sexual partners too. We can do this for literally anything. Job hopping on your resume. The degree of "immoral" is beside the point. We could even say adopting puppies from the shelter in the past can be compared. ​ Note that I am not equating the two, my premise is simply that previous behaviors are often used to judge what a person’s choices might be. This…
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 11:27 AM
-3

A man was convicted of domestic violence twice…5 years ago. You telling me that itd be a good idea for a woman to look past that and get into a relationship with him? What if he was charged 10 times prior? 20? A person’s past mistakes give us an indication on what they are like as a person. Some women can look past a guy’s propensity for violence and some men can look past a girl’s bodycount (or that standard isnt a huge priority for them). Note that I am not equating the two, my premise is simp…
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 11:00 AM
1

A lot of men lie about how they actually feel (and a lot of women do this too) because of how it looks/sounds when they are trying to make a good first impression. You mentioned manipulation. Unfortunately men that dont at least try to do it in some form or another end up getting passed over because people that are “brutally honest” tend to just be assholes. So some political tact is always required when you want to attract/charm someone. And yes I think the underlying thought process was correc…
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 05:08 AM
1

I think you will find that the propensity for laziness is an all too human trait. Unfortunately it is also a cause for depression as well I think. Seems like we are heading in that direction.
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 05:04 AM
1

Not as familiar with all of the isms as of late, but I guess it determines what you consider “hateful”. I just thought terp was a way to say TRP phonetically. If you consider thinking others are inferior to you = hateful, then sure, I would agree with you. Personally, I think hateful is the act of thinking we would be better off without another group with a level of disdain that equates to wishing them gone/dead. So we may be playing a game of definitions and terms.
/r/ExRedPill09/10/23 12:23 AM
1

The hard part is over. You found someone who loves you. Now just communicate openly and honestly with each other and continue to self improve. It is possible to take the nice stuff out of red pill without the toxic stuff. Wishing you both a happy and successful marriage with each other!
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 11:38 PM
2

I think it taught me a lot about being the best version of myself that I can be in a practical manner. I think it doesnt necessarily teach feminine qualities that women may also look for (caretaking/being a present father) etc. And it overlooks things that may make the “woman they want” (the submissive, docile, doesnt care about their money and just wants to be with them for them) types may want (respect, monogamy, self control, etc). It is funny because they talk about how HVM types are rare bu…
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 11:16 PM
1

That is like saying feminists hate men, full stop. We gotta be careful about labels since a lot of people fall under a spectrum of values or world views. Just because OP’s partner is going down the red pill rabbit hole and may have conservative values does not mean that he hates his partner. I personally dislike a lot of women’s attitude towards dating in the modern era. I find hookup culture to be self destructive, not empowering. That doesn’t mean that I hate women lol. I just think it is goin…
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 10:42 PM
2

Well that statement sorta defends trp by saying “unless they are rich and attractive” funnily enough haha, but yeah I agree that trp isnt going to help “the average guy” in his dating journey. It never was nor does it purport to. It is all about self improvement and that is one of the things about it that I can get behind, without all the misogynistic stuff.
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 10:31 PM
1

Im not RP. I have my own contentions with the things they teach. I think it has some bits that are true and some that are false. I just dont like seeing positions misrepresented. But I do like to see other perspectives as well.
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 10:27 PM
1

Interesting, I hadnt considered that. You might be onto something there. TRP argues men have to do so and adapt to the current environment. Trad guys no longer qualify for trad women due to our modern lense on society. Regardless, I am hopeful that things will even out eventually.
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 04:18 PM
1

We do not know what his feelings are towards OP. For all we know he is thanking his lucky stars he ended up with someone decent somehow instead of the modern thots on social media. And well the conversation about unconditional love is a big topic. Ultimately there are some dire situations which can cause us to not love someone. If my wife murdered my children, I wouldnt love her anymore for example. But this is more of a philosophical question imo.
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 03:55 PM
1

At the end of the day you found out who he really was, what he liked/didnt like and it caused too much stress for you to put up with those things. It sucks, but it happens. You see it as him pulling a 180. He may see it as the freedom to finally be himself and not worry about the reaction because he feels empowered. You claim to be ashamed for trying to salvage your relationship and adhere to his crazy demands but honestly it sounds commendable to me. A lot of people would have just given up, bu…
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 03:47 PM
6

Yes I do find in a lot of trp content there are some really smart women that bring up valid points and the men just shut them down for “hurting the quality of the show”, “arguing to argue”, “arguing in bad faith”, “being masculine, etc” … its just like… geez man just identify the point of the argument and then debate that. Stop beating around the bush and talking about how they are combating your point. Smh
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 03:37 PM
1

Haha I probably categorize myself under the weak and ineffectual man stereotype for a lot of women. Im not perfect. She takes on way more of the housework and childcare than I do. Im trying to get better at balancing it out more but alas, I make mistakes too. Personally I see the opposite as an observer. Which is probably why im more red pilled I guess. The trend I see, and this may or may not be true, is that women have extremely high standards or arent looking for long term commitment when the…
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 03:33 PM
3

All good, I also appreciate you sharing your experiences as well. Relationships are a tricky thing to get into, but a lot of couple’s therapists I watch (who by no means are red pilled at all) still all agree somewhat to the laundry list of things and as long as both parties agree to it, those values can be whatever because ultimately consent and transparency is the main thing. From my understanding they all agree that having a set of non-negotiables, nice to haves, and things I can compromise w…
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 03:14 PM
2

I believe you are assuming he was seeking an exception to the rule rather than stumbling upon it. He only recently went through red pill content during their relationship, not prior to it. He may have a list of traits that he finds attractive in an individual. A large majority of women he has dealt with in the past may not exhibit the most of these traits. We are effectively all trying to look for the “exception” to those negative experiences we have come across previously aren’t we? Do women al…
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 02:54 PM
1

I dont even follow the line of thought you are going through here. You are either “hypergamous” or not. He thinks the majority of women are. Therefore if you are in the “not” category you would be seen as an exception to the rule. That doesnt then equate to him putting you on a pedestal…In fact, most of the red pill actively tells men to not put women on one..? So I am struggling to see where this is relevant. Can you help me see what led you to “he will put you on a pedestal?”
/r/ExRedPill08/10/23 09:09 AM
1

Even guys like Jordan Peterson understand the value of rational debate. As he said, if you are a smart person you truly dont want to be the smartest in the room and you actively seek and check to see whether or not something you hold true is false so you can improve as a person. You can watch red pill content with guys like Destiny and other psychologists/therapists on the panel so he can see if any valid points are raised. Maybe just have an open discussion and answer his red pill questions. As…
/r/ExRedPill06/10/23 11:46 PM
1

They make it very apparent that you're meant to keep the redpill stuff quiet if you're not already a "HVM" multi-millionaire. The dating strategy they impart is to understand the playbook and use it to your advantage and essentially lie to women. They always say not to discuss TRP with women when you're dating them lol.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/23 02:43 PM
1

Well I suppose that is as intended unfortunately. We cant help our preferences. Best of luck with your search for the one.
/r/ExRedPill04/10/23 11:37 AM
1

Thats a shame. Im attracted to average looking women personally. The supermodel types put me off. Probably because im insecure about it idk. Just seems like too much trouble to be worth getting attached to. Ultimately if you are the best version of yourself you can be, then women will respond well to it in the end I reckon. But you do gotta put the work in to be a better version of yourself and I think that part of the redpill message is something they get right.
/r/ExRedPill03/10/23 08:52 AM
2

What exactly are you saying? I dont think the majority of people in committed relationships are totally cool with their partner subbing to onlyfans. And so that leaves the polyarmorous types and single (mainly men) and then we gotta ask ourselves how many of those single men are actually single by choice and just “horny” as you put it. Idk it doesnt seem to make much intuitive sense to me.
/r/ExRedPill03/10/23 08:48 AM
2

I think a lot of people mix up the differences between simps and gentlemen. And I think a lot of women also dislike simps because they have an ulterior motif and it is easily sniffed out. Often time “nice guys” are made fun of for not “actually being nice” due to their expectation of some kind of sexual attention as a result. Whereas a gentleman is like this to any man, woman or child without any selfish expectation. But then you have guys misusing simp by calling men who treat the girls that ar…
/r/ExRedPill03/10/23 01:53 AM
7

Shame. Id really like it if you did. I value other perspectives being shared and trying to understand the broader picture.
/r/ExRedPill03/10/23 01:47 AM
1

Basically what they've said it. You need to lower your standards because you are in a "very narrow corner" so you have taken your own perspective from a very limited highly specific pool and then extrapolated your experience across the entire population. What they failed to mention is that there are other traits that women find attractive, so you can compensate for lack of height with other attributes. Take Aaron Marino (Alpha M) he compensates for it by money, status, fashion sense, fitness and…
/r/ExRedPill03/10/23 12:50 AM
1

Yeah as a lot of people mentioned here terms like simp are problematic because it isnt very well defined. If any action you take to show kindness towards a woman is a simp then a simp can be any person and someone who isnt a simp is likely a very unpleasant person towards women. Fact is we do acts of kindness for each other all the time. The simpishness may extend into the expectation of some kind of sexual favor as compensation for being kind though and thats not genuine kindness. Onlyfans serv…
/r/ExRedPill03/10/23 12:36 AM
5

I think it's a factor in why the market exists. Lots of lonely men who are socially awkward and afraid of rejection (or men who are just always rejected and striking out a lot despite not caring) fund the market for sexual access and having the "fantasy girlfriend" experience. Am I missing something else?
/r/ExRedPill03/10/23 12:27 AM
5

The point is that onlyfans isnt making a genuine connection with a girl. And if it were that easy, the market for it wouldnt exist.
/r/ExRedPill03/10/23 12:23 AM
1

Sorry you had to go through that. At least you figured out your differences in values before getting married though. As terrible as it sounds, he's not being hypocritical by cheating on you with an overweight 55+, single mother of 4 like you're portraying here as some kind of contradiction. TRP Podcasts refer to them as "recreational use only", but tbh it kinda seems like all of their relationships are "recreational use only" so it makes it hard to distinguish what a genuine relationship with th…
/r/ExRedPill02/10/23 10:05 PM
2

Red pill has that as the goal because it is about being sexually attractive towards women according to their framework. If that isnt your goal then it is not necessary anyways. No blue, purple, or red pill required. I dont think a monk or a priest is exactly consuming red pill content because it just isn’t necessary for them and their lifestyle. That said, I would say that wanting sexual intimacy and not being able to attract women or the functional equivalent, wanting a long term relationship f…
/r/ExRedPill30/09/23 12:30 AM
1

So which is it? "Cope" or SMV in action? It doesn't have to be either/or it can be both. Here's a scenario: The HVM wants this woman who is a hot, virgin, faithful, respectful, and submissive wife. This woman wants a hot, faithful, virgin, and religious man. She may disqualify him. He may then say "she was lower value anyways" and therefore it is a "Cope" AND it is also his inability to attract her due to his "SMV". However the hot, faithful, virgin, and religious man may struggle with his own S…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 02:25 PM
1

I mean I don't think I disagree with any of your points here because you even said it yourself. There are things TRP is stating that isn't exclusive to TRP itself anyways. Although I do want to say that confirmation bias goes both ways when it comes to our own anecdotal dating experiences. ​ But if you automatically assume everyone who hurts your feelings or doesn’t say/do/look/have the history you like best is “lower value than I’m willing to accept, or able to attract”, you’ve just made a mass…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 09:34 AM
-7

My points of contention are more for "It most definitely is." "...he suffers from insecurity" rather than approaching it from a "I believe this is most likely the case" and "I believe he suffers from insecurity, based off the reasons I've provided." The wording is being said as if it were fact instead of opinion. That's why I said your message appeared to be very pushy and overly certain. You are welcome to disagree and have a different opinion. I'm just not a fan of the conviction as it has a c…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 08:07 AM
-11

Sure I dont disagree with you. I found it fascinating. Not saying anyone else necessarily has to. Simply my opinion. You appear to be very pushy and overly certain of your own worldview, and incapable of conceptualising the fact that other people may not share the same opinions you do.
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 07:20 AM
1

Agreed, I don't think the framework should be an all or nothing approach. I personally haven't seen it proported as such either. All of the red pill shows I've seen make it very clear that they are speaking about broad generalizations of the majority of men/women, but can't account for every individual of course. I'm not overly fond of labels in general because I like to evaluate positions on a case by case basis personally, but labels are useful because it gives you a decent understanding on wh…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 04:54 AM
1

I was watching a podcast Andrew Tate had with a therapist and he actually said something that I found to be quite interesting; which was that he doesn't desire happiness. He desires pride and feeling accomplished in order to feel fulfilled. Having goals, accomplishing them, and taking pride in accomplishing those goals may then derive some measure of happiness, but it should never just be there all the time. In fact he vilifies being happy with mediocrity, feeling entitled to have things handed …
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 04:23 AM
6

I guess it really depends on the motivations behind why you feel competitive against women specifically. If your mindset is "Women are inferior to men, so how the hell are all these women my age able to be far more successful than me!?" then there may be some underlying misogyny there you need to address. They aren't inferior to men when it comes to ability to make money. In fact, career driven women are probably able to make more money a bit easier by comparison. There is nothing wrong with bei…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 04:16 AM
1

Yeah I agree, but it is kinda like any "ism" right? We may relate to some parts and not with others and we gotta apply what we find useful and discard what we don't. Results may vary. I don't think there's any one size fits all solution that works for everyone and in a world where there are different goals, agendas, and standards we have to optimize for our own specific ones in order to get the most out of life.
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 03:32 AM
1

What is wrong with trying to identify characteristics that the majority of men/women find attractive? You are an individual person and have your own prioritisation of characteristics that you find attractive, just like me, my wife and your fiance. We will place value and compromise on certain deal breakers more so than others. For example, you are probably more willing to compromise on chastity than I am whereas I may be more willing to compromise on "crazy wild sex" than you are. You may be att…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 02:56 AM
1

Yeah I totally agree with everything you're saying. Essentially it is a way to justify whatever standards you want in place because you are in the position to control the relationship. I find it kind of funny how they villainize women for "walking all over the man and losing respect for him" when they are control when they essentially are doing the exact same thing and that is where I see the hypocrisy sorta come in. I am monogamous. I can understand as a third party observer some red pilled tru…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 02:02 AM
1

Interesting, I've been meaning to get Mad Men on the list of things to watch... I'll need to give it a look through. I think that's where Don's character flaw is though. The red pill doesn't advocate for monogamy if you have the sexual market pull of an HVM. I get the whole Madonna Whore complex. The problem is that the red pill states that there is no such thing as a woman who can satisfy a man sexually (including the degenerate women) because men want quantity/variety (that's why porn exists).…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 12:53 AM
1

Sorry for the wall of text haha, but if you ever get time to go through it I'd love and appreciate your insight. Thanks and same to you with your engagement! Well yeah, I can agree that everyone values different things, but would you disagree on the general trend that there are traits that a man has which are more attractive than the other superficially? These traits are easily identifiable by asking the question: "Assuming all other traits are the same, would you prefer _______________ over ___…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/23 12:47 AM
1

I have my own contentions with red pill theory (hence why I'm here), but I don't like the misrepresentations that sometimes go on straw-manning any argument. My perspective isn't really relevant so I try to take myself out of the equation in most discussions about dating dynamics between the two genders. I don't think that women who have had wild kinky sex are promiscuous. I think women who have a history with multiple sexual partners are "promiscuous". If she only had one boyfriend for 3 years …
/r/ExRedPill28/09/23 06:11 PM
1

I'll try and address these as best as I can. I referenced earlier that there are sex workers who probably have lower body counts than a lot of "respectable modest women". But a stripper with a body count of 2 is likely not going to get a commitment over a modest woman with a body count of 10 because we tend to judge books by their cover. So objectively the stripper is less of a "whore" but she will still not be seen as wife material. So virginity isn't really the end goal so to speak, but the op…
/r/ExRedPill28/09/23 05:03 PM
1

Do men who objectify women actually hate them though? I don't think that's really mutually exclusive. I think if you hate women it is more along the lines of "women are useless and provide no value to society other than to take because they are so inferior that they may as well not exist" This woman is wild and "sexually gratifying". This woman is caring/warm, but not really into all the kinky stuff. This woman is smart and driven, but not really caring/warm. So we evaluate what we want out of a…
/r/ExRedPill28/09/23 01:21 PM
1

Did Don promise Megan monogamy or something? A lot of the red pill alpha dudebros are upfront about the "One sided open relationship" when dating girls in the first place. The despicable part of cheating is the lying/deception behind it because that is betraying the trust of your partner. So if Don said, "Hey Megan, you're an amazing woman, but I am not going to ever just remain sexually committed to you. If you want to build a family with me, that is what it's going to take. Does that work for …
/r/ExRedPill28/09/23 12:56 PM
1

I don't really follow this line of thought on seeing women as an object. Do women objectify men by wanting those exact same things? I'm failing to reconcile the difference between a guy objectifying a promiscuous woman to explore kinks and committing to someone who is less sexually experienced. No one is saying that promiscuous women are less intelligent/capable of being a good mother/person. In fact there are a lot of sex workers that have had less sex than a lot of "respectable wife material" …
/r/ExRedPill28/09/23 12:43 PM
1

Genuinely curious... what exactly do you do... to be good at sex..? I don't really see women playing a very "active" role in the whole "being good at sex" thing lol. It kinda seems moot? The guy has to be the one that performs imo.
/r/ExRedPill28/09/23 12:32 PM
1

I'm just trying to correct the position for the sake of the argument (not stating my position) You are strawmanning the red pill position. Red pill guys don't slut shame. They love sluts! ....For sex... and sex only... They just don't wife them. I mean this is the entire point of the "one sided open relationship" concept they keep preaching about. They have a "main girl" who is the pure virgin wife. And then they have the harem of hot side hoes lol. So this isn't hypocritical to their position a…
/r/ExRedPill28/09/23 12:29 PM
1

I think the red pill frame of mind is still the best thing to go off of tbh. Be the best version of yourself possible so that it makes others she may entertain cheating with “not worth” losing the relationship over. This statement holds true no matter what stage in life you are at because no amount of work is ever going to change things like genetics. There is a nature of insecurity that comes with placing boundaries on who you are happy to have your partner be friends with or talking over socia…
/r/ExRedPill23/09/23 12:36 AM
1

It's a Scientific Fact that Hypergamy does not exist Idk man, anecdotally, I make lifestyle content on social media. I have random girls sliding into my DMs that I just show where to go because they're after that sorta lifestyle. I've *never* had anything like that when I was on my way up. That said, I'm in the fortunate position to have found a woman who saw the qualities in me before having made something of myself. These women are extremely rare (even more so than the HVM archetype imo). So, …
/r/ExRedPill22/09/23 02:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter