TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StrokeMyAxe Archive

View 3 posts and 110 comments by StrokeMyAxe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Texts
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:10 AM
1

Yes. It’s the same as a man saying he put on a condom but didn’t. It’s rape.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:10 AM
4

I can’t find a video of the acceptance speech for the award? Anyone have sauce?
/r/MensRights19/10/21 03:13 AM
2

Curious, why are you wanting to understand why feminists get mad? Are you planning on interacting with them in some way?
/r/MensRights11/10/21 02:13 PM
2

I guess the issue would be content moderation. We need to tighten it up to real systemic issues and not just some random dumb asses opinion of men that made the poster upset.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 01:55 AM
2

I know, right? We don’t need anyone to wear certain clothes for us to do stupid shit. That’s our natural born right and nobody can take that away from us.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 04:28 PM
1

All people need to “work on themselves”. Even Tony Robbins.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 01:59 AM
3

I feel this is relevant because it makes it very clear that the war on men is only on cis gender men.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 04:10 AM
1

Simple. They push for them because society raised them to think it’s an important life goal. Then they realized they made a huge mistake with someone who wasn’t ready.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:59 AM
16

Yeah, this was widely pointed out by many when the movie first came out. Jenny is supposed to be seen this way.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:26 AM
2

This is sort of an empty gesture. We will never need a draft again. Ground troops will not be needed in the next war like they have been in the past.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/21 05:45 AM
2

I have never been screwed over emotionally or financially. I’m now 37, married with two kids. But I have dated 100+ girls before I met my wife. Never once felt like that after I parted ways with any of them.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 02:20 AM
1

This doesn’t really seem like a men’s rights issue to me. Just some dumb floozy that thinks she’s god gift to men.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 06:16 PM
2

This doesn’t really seem like a mens rights conversation.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 04:21 AM
3

This actually comes from the effort of preserving the future of a people by making sure woman and children would be protected/saved first. Children have more years to give than adults and women are more important for quick repopulation. A population ratio of 1 man to 100 women propagates the species much faster than 1 woman to 100 men.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 04:33 AM
35

It’s funny that if you follow that same logic for both sexes then the woman shouldn’t have had sex if she wasn’t ready to raise a child on her own.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 07:01 PM
4

For the same reason you get called a “libtard” for wanting to help immigrants. The same reason you get called a “nazi” because you hold a conservative principle on social issues. Because people are brainwashed.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 06:42 PM
3

You misunderstand what I’m saying. I’m saying it’s interesting that “morality” for a company is just whatever they think saves or earns them more money.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 02:00 PM
-1

Strange how standing up for rights happens to yield more profits for companies.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 06:35 AM
1

You should send her an email and let her know how it made you feel to be excluded.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 03:36 PM
0

Did someone directly call you a rapist? Or are you talking about the general disposition about men in the world? Those are different things. It’s hard for me to imagine the mass population going around to black men and calling them thugs just because they are black. I find it similarly unlikely this happens with men being called a rapist to their faces, as well.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 03:51 AM
-2

I did not say “child” either. I said baby. As in an unborn baby. A pregnancy.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 05:26 AM
-3

You missed the “if”. Makes a big difference in the argument. There is no “wrong” available to address in your comment.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 05:16 AM
2

If it takes two consenting adults to create a baby, it should, at the very least, take two consenting adults to terminate it. But since it’s well established that men have pretty much no say in the matter, if one wants to keep and the other doesn’t, then that results in an abortion or it results in a mother raising the child alone. That’s my opinion on it.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 05:05 AM
2

100%. That’s the glaring inequity of male and female legal obligations to one another.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 05:00 AM
1

I’m sorry, I didn’t mean they were excluded from serving in wars. They were excluded from the rights associated with serving. It wasn’t until the mid 1900’s that they were even recognized as equal enlisters in military. https://www.legion.org/womenveterans/248582/%E2%80%98we-can-do-it-history-women-military-service Edit: just remember, all these women were volunteers.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 07:54 PM
1

This is an interesting perspective. And I’ll assume the basis for it is true, but I must point out that the supremacy came from not allowing women into military, which is what they wanted from the beginning as well. But government said absolutely not. The right to vote without conscription was then decided.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:43 PM
1

I can’t even recall how many times I was asked/told to do things at previous jobs “because you’re a boy/man. It’s a man’s job”. Kiss my ass word. I work for myself now.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/21 07:27 AM
76

My favorite part of the article is where they try to defend themselves by systematically going through how they have excluded only straight men from their program all these years. Lol
/r/MensRights02/03/21 07:17 AM
4

What’s this stat post? Got a link?
/r/MensRights21/11/20 03:56 AM
-3

Everyone here is an asshole
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 05:44 PM
18

No. It’s like forcible breaking their Hymen if they are virgins. So... rape.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:50 AM
3

The problem is, what average joes believes is (or should be) irrelevant. Our entire system is built around what you can prove in court.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 01:49 AM
3

It seems that was exactly what he did. She didn’t address her issues with them, just went behind their back to HR. He didn’t address their issues with her, just went behind her back to other employees. I get that you don’t like how it was handled, and that’s fair. But to call him the asshole here just doesn’t fit at all.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 08:57 PM
3

“I literally said he didn’t speak to this woman about the problems being caused” Your position is that he somehow had the obligation to handle the situation in only the way you see correct. Otherwise, he’s an asshole. There is nothing about the post that suggests it’s his obligation to fix or confront this woman about her culture canceling. Edit: I’ll add that him confronting this woman about it WOULD be an asshole thing to do as he is not her superior or manager in any way. “Yeah, fuck me for n…
/r/MensRights03/07/20 08:08 PM
3

Not doing the best and most omniscient thing anyone could possibly do does not make them an asshole. But your position does make you a high horsing judgmental SOB.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 08:00 PM
11

A better person? It sounds like someone came in and started ruining the work place for 49 other people and OP found a remedy to save the herd by getting rid of the problem. The gender of the person is irrelevant. If it was a new guy doing the same thing with the same resulting action from the OP, I would be applauding as well.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 05:22 PM
15

Imagine some asshole person comes in and starts ruining something you love. And everyone else is sad because of their oppressive mentality. How is it being an asshole by protecting the thing you love by ousting the person causing the oppression?
/r/MensRights03/07/20 04:26 PM
1

Oh, not worried about that. Self employed. Just very busy and it really isn’t worth the effort for me.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 10:21 PM
14

Isn’t that how everything is? The most extreme and loud examples become labeled the norm? That’s our society and the tactic of straw manning, promoting a hasty generalization and false dichotomies against legitimate arguments.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:59 PM
2

Not really mad. It just seemed backwards that I would need my wife’s permission for a vasectomy but she could get an abortion without my knowledge. It really was about men’s rights to their unborn child for me. Not necessarily men’s rights to get a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 06:07 PM
1

This isn’t a law. It’s an office policy. Apparently it’s pretty common.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:31 PM
1

After looking into, it’s just an office policy for all married couples. Nothing illegal about it for hippa stuff either, because it’s a requirement before the procedure is done.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:06 PM
2

Most people are in this line of thinking too. One thing that seems to be the question still is “does it break hippa standards” or however you’d like to phrase it.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:25 AM
1

Chemical sterilization?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:17 AM
1

I know what I should do, but I’m not very available nor in a good position to make a big deal about it. It’s just one of those things that I fear could easily get more involved than I was willing to do. But... I’m not putting a fork in it as of yet. We will see. Wife, kids, career... just so busy now.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:17 AM
2

I believe this is true based on the consensus from the others here.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 10:42 PM
3

I’m so impressed. Everyone here on the sub, very impressed indeed. They all see you soaring high in the clouds like an eagle of nobility!
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:22 PM
2

Yes, you are absolutely right. But also, you would expect there to be at the very minimum the same amount of consent when it comes to abortion. That most definitely had the input of two people. Lol
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:13 PM
1

Yes, you are absolutely right. It isn’t equivalent. I was trying to show the disparity in something literally nothing to do with the female spouse requiring permission/acknowledgement from them and then something that is 50% contribution form the male spouse is completely disregarded as anything of his say about it. In this scenario, my wife and I are on the same page. We just found it absurd that they required her giving consent on the form as well.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:18 PM
3

Believe it or not. I don’t care. Lol
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:15 PM
3

Stop being so binary. It’s embarrassing. Literally think you’re a fucking genius that can read minds and knows everything about the world because your did “a five second google search”. I don’t know what’s more embarrassing, that you actually believe this or that you don’t even see how idiotic it sounds.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:05 PM
3

Wow. You really showed me. You just won. Way to go! You are absolutely the smartest person on this sub, hell, maybe even reddit! Go you!
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:03 PM
2

Prime example right here. Completely engulfed in emotion to combat and destroy. So much so, that this person evidently didn’t read the entire comment to see where it is pointed out that the right has their representation too, and that I just believe the left is overly represented on reddit. Devolving binary minds. Edit: ironically exacerbating and even being the genesis of the very thing this person claims to hate... bring politics into this sub. One bit of uncanny fact, “men’s rights” by its ve…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 07:18 PM
2

Well it appears that women receive the same form whenever they elect to have the equivalent procedure done and are married.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 07:13 PM
1

It seems that it’s not a violation id it’s a practiced policy that requires the notice BEFORE the procedure. Edit: that’s just from consensus. Not me searching through the statutes.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 07:12 PM
2

100% agree with all that. For me, it’s when two people join together consensually to have sex, it no longer becomes a single persons responsibility or right to do everything solo.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 07:11 PM
3

Well, me and my two testicles believe you. Edit: also, reddit is full of toxic leftist that know nothing but to destroy/silence any thought that challenges their world. The right has their little group as well , but reddit is the motherland for leftist extremist idealism. IMHO
/r/MensRights30/06/20 04:45 PM
3

Yes. Absolutely a more fair comparison.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 04:38 PM
1

Haha. Somewhere here in the comments, someone spoke about their 23 year old friend trying to get it done. Had to visit several doctors.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 04:08 PM
2

Ahh yes. That’s a complete removal. Although, any and every option for the female is incredibly more invasive (the reason for me getting it done and not my wife) I think the social contract aspect of it is the same. Removing the ability to procreate.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 04:06 PM
1

Reddit really is the social media where individuality comes to die, ain’t it?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 04:04 PM
3

Ah, yes. Thank you.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 03:04 PM
1

Hysterectomy?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:58 PM
3

Hmm. You seem like your being a bitch to me, but I think you may just be unable to comprehend your internal hypocrisy here. Either way. I don’t think I want to continue talking to you. You are clearly going on the offense on a personal level here. Good day.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:56 PM
1

Right. as another Reddit or pointed out, it’s equivalent to a mastectomy. But, I just responded to someone else here. The vasectomy just involves the man and nobody else’s investment. An abortion involves the woman, the man and an unborn child. There should be, at minimum, the same level of consent required to proceed. Or at least proof of acknowledgement.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:52 PM
10

Exactly. With a vasectomy it’s just the man being affected. But with an abortion it’s the woman, the man and their unborn child. You would think there would be, at minimum, the same level of consent required.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:44 PM
3

Oooo. Yeah. Probably do to the Christian beliefs that heavily influenced the way we Union two people.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:36 PM
1

You may not have been addressing my original post, possibly responding in general to other responses. My anger was and is directed at the medical community and our government. Definitely not directed at women. If anything, the actual focus I have here in my mind is Mens right ls when it comes to abortions.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:33 PM
1

I mean, it’s not a problem for us. We made the choice together. I would never have made it I’m without her, but it’s shocking that I would even have to consider her from a medical standpoint.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:28 PM
2

What specifically? Did I miss something?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:56 PM
1

Are you in a community property state? Where, once you are married, everything is split 50/50 ownership?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:38 PM
1

Texas?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:37 PM
1

Well, it’s a commitment to another person. In a sense, even outside of this scenario, you give up some freedoms.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:20 PM
1

Unconfirmed, but that is what many people here are saying. I’m sure it is accurate info though.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:09 PM
1

The rabbit hole goes much deeper, I’m afraid.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:03 PM
1

Purportedly, they do ask them. It seems to be a Texas thing and a voluntary thing.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:03 PM
1

I have a friend (female) very much the same way. Never wanted to procreate and very much wanted it permanent. Always said she would adopt if she ever wanted kids. She had some thing installed that grows and attaches inside the tubes. Permanent af. But, she did wind up adopting about 8 years later. Was her plan all along.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:59 PM
3

Ooo. I guess I never even thought about that information being relevant to the divorce itself. Custody and fault. Thanks for all your detailed responses! Really opened up my perspective on this.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:35 PM
1

I’m sorry, I don’t think I was clear. I mean, I suspect there was previous issues with men and women over secret birth control operations and doctors started getting drug into it. Then, this became a general cya to release them from the liability.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:55 AM
1

Oh wow. That is absolutely ambiguous. Lol.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:49 AM
1

The general consensus seems to be that this is a doctor specific thing and nothing to do with any real law. Which makes me wonder, how many doctors were sued or caught up in a civil suit because of this. I do have a sense that it stems from some 40’s or 50’s era issue.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:47 AM
7

To clarify, as part of a divorce, the courts will order each spouse to disclose all medical history?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:22 AM
0

Ahh, ok. I think I get it. These are strictly civil suits and wouldn’t have any state legalities involved, right?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:17 AM
3

No idea. You are right though. Getting tubes tied would be the exact equivalent. Abortion just came to me because it’s one of the big ones where the man’s rights are non-existent over his unborn child. Which, to me, seems like a much crazier thing to not even need to be concurred on.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:09 AM
1

Is there the same sort of lawsuit right for men towards women for getting their tubes tied or an abortion in Texas?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:03 AM
14

I’m not a big boat rocker when it comes to stuff like this, but I do feel obligated to dig a little into and see what and why this has happened. Thanks for the push
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:56 AM
4

I’d like to get an advanced copy of this book. Lol
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:54 AM
18

Maybe. I don’t know. Texas has some pretty unique laws concerning married couples.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:17 AM
12

Oh, sorry. I had it done. Just find it absurd that I need her permission to shoot blanks, but she doesn’t need my permission to terminate my unborn child.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:01 AM
3

What’s an MRA? Wdit. Oh wait. Nvm. Lol
/r/MensRights01/06/20 12:26 AM
5

I’m not a violent person, but if someone screamed this in my face I would end them.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 01:21 AM
20

Self hating men are the best!
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/20 05:36 AM
1733

Wait... you mean outwardly unfairly treating half your potential customers isn’t good for business?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/20 01:49 AM
2

Well yeah, just look at 50 Shades of Gray. If the dude wasn’t good looking, he’d be in prison.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 05:33 AM
3

It was an attempt to save the ego.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:26 PM
5

Winner winner chicken dinner
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:11 PM
20

No. But it does mean that the level of athleticism in men is higher, therefore I’d expect a higher percentage of men to be able to score a point on her.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:19 AM
21

Maybe I can shorten this post with a single question. Why are there Men Sports and Women Sports?
/r/MensRights16/07/19 09:40 AM
58

What a POS
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/18 07:04 AM
3

“More aware of the consequences” This is what’s wrong. This right here. You think women as weak, dumb and inferior. Whether you mean to or not, it’s in your foundation to think less of them.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/18 03:26 AM
-3

Why is this shocking? Women can be just as much of a shithead as men. People are shitheads.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 03:18 AM
1

So this is just some hypothetical statement? Where is this happening and where is the proof?
/r/MensRights31/10/18 09:02 PM
1

Right. I haven’t really heard of any other instances like this. Just the same one being shared throughout the ages. Maybe it doesn’t really happen “a lot” at all.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:26 AM
1

Oh this is old news. Read it on a few other threads.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:16 AM
-3

How much is “a lot” though? Like, 1% of accusations? 40% of accusations? How much is “a lot”?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 03:16 AM
-3

Your article says “This happens a lot” in its thumbnail. Let’s be clear then. How much does it happen?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:18 AM
-7

“A lot” is such a subjective terminology. Let’s be more specific OP. How much exactly is “a lot”?
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:39 PM
16

They just don’t make them like this anymore. These older models were too effective and were not as profitable as the newer, sparkliest versions you see nowadays. I blame outsourcing.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 04:02 PM
2

Haha! Right?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter