TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Strong-Camp-4734 Archive

View 0 posts and 101 comments by Strong-Camp-4734 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You don’t need to apologize, bro. Downvotes aren’t going to keep me up at night. Particularly, when people don’t offer a rebuttal or reason behind them. Had it been their brother or niece, I think they’d be singing a different tune - but, since they didn’t live the experience, they can keep it far enough out of mind to justify trigger finger button clicking someone else’s lived experiences that might not align with their personal agenda. But, this is the game that both sides play, right? Cheer w…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:56 PM
-3

Heck no. My little brother was raped by a male babysitter when he was 9 - I was 12. We never had issues with our female babysitters. My niece (my brother’s daughter) was then molested by a male babysitter - she was 5, now 9. As far as I know, she’s never had issues with female babysitters.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 07:10 PM
-6

So, the amount of me I see going to the nail salon is just an outlier then? I see more men with painted nails than I do women nowadays. I shouldn’t see a man in Victoria’s Secret buying himself something. That’s a woman’s store. Why does a man need a bra and thong? Chippendales and other male strip clubs are for women. I can bet your bottom dollar gay men go there. Don’t even get me started on gay and trans people in the women’s bathroom. Why are the trans men buying tampons? I wasn’t aware that…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 05:03 PM
-12

So, technically, wouldn’t the gays be taking over women’s spaces? Why are grown men wearing make-up, heels, bras, thongs, dresses? Those items are made for females? Why do the gays feel like they can wear those products and take over the feminine space? Nobody wants to see that shit on a man. I’ll be more pissed about a woman in a gay club, when I see men take off the eyelashes and lipstick.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 01:05 PM
10

I understand the point behind the post, but, wow. Not only are you about to give feminist groups a ton of ammunition by implying your wife is your property; but, in a way, I feel you actually believe it. You don’t have legal ownership over another person, even if you’re married to them. You’re a married man, and can we be frank for a hot second? It’s admirable that those women don’t want to sleep with a married man - they probably see too much room for mess and drama. I don’t blame them for not …
/r/MensRights04/01/26 03:19 PM
4

Here come the women with the “sounds like you hate your wife” garbage. Lol. I don’t hate my wife. I have expectations in my marriage. That doesn’t mean I hate my wife.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:11 PM
1

You make it seem like thousands of women don’t go through that procedure regularly. Yes - I’ve been told it can be uncomfortable sometimes; but, so can a vasectomy. I can’t make a procedure less uncomfortable. She leaves the house - she works, goes shopping, takes my brother’s kids out once a week so my mom gets a day off, etc.. She’s not a shut-in, just doesn’t like to have as much fun anymore. She’s the woman. It’s ultimately her responsibility to ensure she doesn’t get pregnant if she doesn’t…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:08 PM
0

Sorry, but I didn’t get married under the premise that I would need to use a condom with the woman I made my wife. The downside is not all on her. I share the burden too. I would have much rather she went with the IUD. I believed her when she says it was painful, but she also made the choice to not go through with the IUD. She could have gotten it placed. The doctor gave her options, but she was scared. I’m sympathetic to that. However, ultimately, she chose the pill over the IUD. That was her c…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:16 PM
-4

Yes, I would prefer my wife to be on the pill than wear a condom. That doesn’t make me an AH. It’s my preference. It’s not my fault the pill gives her side effects. It is what it is. If she didn’t want to be on the pill, she didn’t need me marry me. Her GYN attempted the first time after her period. They told her to take some ibuprofen for the discomfort. They couldn’t force it in. They said she was in too much pain to keep going and to come back in a few weeks. They gave her vaginal misoprostol…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:40 PM
-44

Condoms are a hard pass for me all the way around - just be a man and tell your girl to go on the pill. If she wants to be with you, she’ll go on the pill to make you happy
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:33 PM
-27

I’m not being satire. What would that offer to the conversation? When we got married, I made it clear that condoms are a hard line for me. I told her if she didn’t want to get pregnant, she would need to figure it out. She tried to get an IUD, but the doctor couldn’t force her cervix open enough (even with vaginal misoprostol) to install it. She was given the option to have her cervix cut so they could place it, or find something else. She went on the pill. She had a spell of really bad depressi…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:29 PM
-42

It’s easy enough to have a woman take the pill. I told my wife once we got married, I wasn’t wrapping, and it’s her job to make sure she doesn’t get pregnant. She takes the pill because the doctor couldn’t force her cervix to open enough to install the IUD. Really, the only side effects would be depression and anxiety, but her doctor put her on some antidepressants and anti-anxiety meds for that too. So, other than not wanting to go out as much, she’s golden in that regard. It’s not that hard to…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:52 PM
-4

Republicans view women and incubators and men as war and wage-slave pawns. Let’s be serious, Trump is much more likely to enforce a male only draft. Look at Hegseth. He’s already more or less stated he doesn’t want women in the military. But, maybe you’re right. The President of Peace probably just wants to send the young men on an all inclusive trip to a South American resort. I’ve heard the weather in Venezuela is beautiful this time of year.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 12:45 PM
-10

Let’s be for real. We won’t even provide reparations to entire cultural and ethnic groups that were destroyed by colonialism. I think we’d be more likely to see it snowing on a hot July day. It’s not gonna happen.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 03:58 PM
3

I think it depends on whether or not you would have male volunteers to be leaders. When I was in troops, we didn’t have many male adults willing to volunteer. My dad said he didn’t have time, so my mom took me. I’d say, yes, if adult men would be willing to step up as Boy Scout troop leaders. If not, what’s the point?
/r/MensRights10/12/25 02:49 PM
11

I would agree with your wife. There’s only so much a woman can teach a man and there’s only so much a man can teach a woman. Men and women are raised / socialized differently from a very young age. Be happy that your wife wants you to take lead on raising and socializing your son. He’s going to be much better off in life if his father teaches him how to interact with the world rather than his mother. My wife’s parents had twins (a boy twin and a girl twin - I married the girl). My FIL took lead …
/r/MensRights10/12/25 02:30 PM
1

I waited 6 months before I slept with my now wife. I don’t regret it at all. It was the first time in my life I felt truly connected to a person before sleeping with them. It was the first time I ever experienced a relationship that wasn’t founded on sex. I didn’t ask her to sleep with me until I was ready to make things official and monogamous. Women who don’t sleep with you on the first date aren’t not interested in you. If that were true, I wouldn’t be married to my wife. If you go into a dat…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 05:54 PM
2

You’re a trash human being, man. What kind of person does that as a “joke?” Nah, man. You’re just gross. Don’t come here looking for validation because you got caught being a creep. You have an odd view on friendship if that’s how you treat a “friend.” Something tells me you wouldn’t do that to your male friend; and, if you would, also trash. Sharing illicit photos of another person, altered or not, is creepy behavior. Don’t bring that garbage here. You’re making this sub a joke and serving ammu…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 12:26 AM
1

Society shames men too? If a man gets proposed to by a woman, is he not seen as less of a man in the greater eyes of the public? As I noted, most men in my realm agree. Out of the 24 men in my department, 22 said they would never enter a relationship with a woman who approached them. Maybe sleep with them, but never enter a relationship with them. I could use some of the language they used about women who choose to approach a man, but I’m not gonna get banned for foul language. Lmao. Trash… Desp…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:26 PM
1

Just asked around work quick too. 22 of the 24 men in my department stated they would not be attracted to a woman asking them out. They might sleep with her, but never would see her as relationship material.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:58 PM
1

In my realm (family, friends, and colleagues), a woman who approaches a man is seen as desperate. It’s seen as unfeminine and un-lady like. I didn’t come up with the societal or instinctual norms, dog. It is what it is. If a woman were to approach me (and was single) would I sleep with her? Probably, but that’s not a woman worthy of relationship material.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:54 PM
1

That’s not the natural or societally correct method of starting a relationship. Women who approach men are seen as desperate or unfeminine, meaning women are less likely to do it due to the shame associated with it. I wouldn’t date a woman who approached me, neither would my buddies, they’re just desperate for male attention. In nature, which gender is the gender who has the most to prove in order to spread their genes? It’s the males who provide the grand gestures, not the females.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:58 PM
1

Lmao. Religion was created a lot longer ago than the 1950’s. And, to be frank, I have a much higher standing in the church than my wife could ever dream of having. When we’re at church, our denomination doesn’t allow for women to preach the gospel or teach men about religion. She’s not permitted to have a role in the church because she is a woman. The only role she can play is by joining the choir. She was not even allowed to choose the music at our wedding. I had to give my approval on Bible ve…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 09:34 PM
2

It has nothing to do with leading versus following in the literal sense of the word. I don’t think any one person, male or female, should be submissive to the other. When I say, lead and follow, I mean, the man leads the relationship with love/respect, and the woman will follow and reciprocate those same sentiments. I was raised by a father that taught me, if you want a woman to treat you like a king, you have to take the lead and treat her like a queen. While I am a believer in a God, It has no…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 05:50 PM
4

Jeez. Touchy much? If you aren’t looking for a woman or don’t care about women, why does it bother you so much? I’m not bothered by things that have no bearing on my future. If you aren’t seeking a relationship with a woman now or in the future, it has no bearing on your life if they find you attractive. You’re just looking for something to be mad about. You might not be looking for a relationship with a woman; but there are still plenty of men who are. This is a public forum. Not everyone is a …
/r/MensRights12/11/25 04:44 PM
-1

I think both genders objectify relatively equally. For every woman saying they won’t date a man who doesn’t have “big muscles” there’s a man who won’t date a woman because she doesn’t have “bikini body.” Unfortunately, at the end of the day, we’re biologically mammals, and nature shows us that not every male or female is guaranteed a mate. I see the argument that men are more attracted to women than women are to men. That’s true across most of the animal kingdom. Males want to spread their genes…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 12:47 PM
1

I would agree. At my church and others in the same denomination, women (including my wife) are shamed for having a career and working for a living. My wife was told she is going to hell for not actively bearing children and instead focusing on a career (so we can one day afford children). She was also told that she was going to hell for having sex before marriage (she’s only had 2 partners- one of which is me; both of which she was engaged to before sleeping with them). It’s both sides, not just…
/r/MensRights27/10/25 07:23 PM
2

If y’all want it go for it, but heck no for making it mandatory. If it’s mandatory, the government is involved and I don’t want my DNA or my kid’s DNA being handed off to some government entity. Y’all would be crazy to expect me to hand my DNA over just because you don’t choose women you can trust before sleeping with them.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 03:12 PM
2

It’s called natural selection. Not all men will have a relationship, not all women will have a relationship. It’s kinda the breaks of the game. Man or woman, make yourself more desirable or don’t. I’m a 5’8 man with a GED and some non-violent felonies, now happily married to a great woman. Finding a partner isn’t really all that hard if you make yourself more desirable and treat people with kindness. If you go about life blaming other people for your inadequacies instead of working to change the…
/r/MensRights23/10/25 03:19 PM
5

I don’t care if I never get flowers. When my wife wants to get me something special, she gets me a new car part for my Cobra or something I can add to my model train collection. I find that much more special than some flowers that’ll be rotten in a week.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 12:56 PM
1

To be honest, you’re making generalizations of me and my family based on a situation you weren’t involved in. I’m not saying it isn’t fair game, you don’t know the whole story; but, my concern is the boy, not my fully adult brother’s mental condition. There was a union of a type, but not on paper. All assets were separated. They were both actively trying to get pregnant. He was just as involved in the fertility treatments as she was. He got cold feet and flaked off on her. He was the one who was…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 05:26 PM
5

Are you daft? He is not obligated to pay child support. It was settled in court. Please, don’t speak on things you have no understanding of. All you’re doing is arguing to argue at this point. That, or, you aren’t able to comprehend that nothing in life is black or white. It’s all shades of gray.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 05:18 PM
2

I’m in the United States. Both parties had to agree to the terms; but, It really wasn’t a one-sided thing whatsoever. In a lot of ways, my brother got off really easy. At the time, I wasn’t happy with how the court played this one out, to be frank. I think my brother’s choice was wrong - not for reasons that most would likely assume; but it’s a bit personal, and I think he scrolls Reddit. So, I’d prefer not to give too many details. Let’s just say, it was a very much planned pregnancy that invol…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 04:11 PM
5

Can you not do your own research? Life Lesson: AI is not the end-all-be all. It’s for people who are too lazy to do their own research and work. Maybe don’t go around sharing “teehee, I’m so smart, I can type a question into an AI bot and it’ll tell me what to say.” Lmao. I’m a real man, having a real conversation. I was giving a real life scenario: my brother does not pay child support. He worked it out in the court with my nephew’s mother. He has no legal obligation to pay for anything related…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 03:33 PM
1

That’s not necessarily true. My nephew hasn’t been adopted by another man. My brother worked it out in the courts with my nephew’s mom. He didn’t want to be in the child’s life at the time he didn’t want financial responsibility. He worked it out in the courts. He doesn’t pay child support, but he has no legal access to my nephew. My nephew’s mom is a decent woman. She still allows my family to be involved with my nephew, even though she has no legal or otherwise obligation to do so. She has her…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 02:54 PM
4

But, since he terminated his rights, he has no access to my nephew and now he regrets it. I’m not sure how this is getting misconstrued. I was very clear in my post. He doesn’t pay anything towards the child. He terminated his rights. He doesn’t pay child support or for anything related to the kid. He’s not legally obligated to. Now that he’s older. He regrets doing so. But, you can’t take back parental rights once you terminate them.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 02:34 PM
0

I don’t know where you live, but where I live, if you terminate parental rights (meaning no legal obligation to the child) you don’t necessarily pay child support. My brother doesn’t pay child support, and he’s not legally obligated to. He has no legal right to the child.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 02:30 PM
3

Dude. Are you not reading my post? My brother does NOT pay child support. He signed his rights away and does NOT pay child support. He doesn’t pay anything towards the kid.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 02:28 PM
2

How did it not relieve him of his duty? Lol. He doesn’t have to take care of the child physically, emotionally, financially or otherwise. In the eyes of the state, he isn’t my nephew’s father. He got a paper abortion. He doesn’t pay a dime towards that boy and until recently, he didn’t care about the kid.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:07 PM
-8

You can sign away your parental rights. That’s more or less what adoption is. All a man has to do, at least in my state, is sign away their parental rights. My brother did it awhile back. He seriously regrets it now. He didn’t realize signing his rights away doesn’t mean he just doesn’t pay child support - he has no legal right to my nephew at all. He’s not permitted to make any decisions regarding my nephew, he’s not allowed to see my nephew, and has no relationship with the nephew. All by his …
/r/MensRights05/10/25 12:48 PM
-2

Jeez. Dramatic much? The sooner we learn to accept that men and women are different, the sooner the world will be a much better place. Relationships are hard, but I would NEVER want to give up seeing my wife every day. She’s my better half, and I’m her better half. Y’all (both men and women) have this idealized version of what a relationship should be. It’s not always sunshine and roses. People need to learn to compromise and work together. If my wife and I can learn to compromise and work toget…
/r/MensRights18/09/25 05:58 PM
3

You shouldn’t have been verbally berated by your on-site supervisor; however, you did show up late multiple days in a row. At my place of work, this would be grounds for termination, and as the manager, I’ve terminated employees for very similar reasons. Did I belittle them? No, but I did fire them. It’s not your supervisor’s issue that there’s no reliable transport. You accepted the job knowing that you didn’t have reliable transportation. It not only puts you in a bad light, but also puts the …
/r/MensRights16/09/25 12:08 PM
3

I think the option should be available to people who want to have DNA or genome testing, but I would never agree with mandatory testing. Do whatever makes you feel better, but I’m not handing my DNA or my child’s DNA over to some government entity. Absolutely not.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:35 PM
2

Sorry, bro. I thought you were trying to make the point that it wasn’t a good thing. Just a miscommunication. Apologies if you thought I was coming after you.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 09:17 PM
-10

Which was the point in my original response. Why is it a bad thing to encourage women to join if the message being driven home is that women should serve?
/r/MensRights05/09/25 09:04 PM
-16

Women aren’t going to be able to compete or compare with men on a physical level. That’s just basic biology. They would need to lower some standards if you want women to serve as well. You can’t have it both ways. Women and men aren’t the same biologically. Either you want women in the military just the same as men, or you want women out of the military because they can’t compare or compete physically with men.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 08:55 PM
7

The number of people I see on here saying women should serve in the military far outweighs the ones who believe they shouldn’t. So, I’m not sure why encouraging women to join is a bad thing? Isn’t a huge driving point of this group to say women should serve in the military just as well as men?
/r/MensRights05/09/25 08:42 PM
4

So, what’s your proposed solution? You can’t force people to have children if they don’t want children. You can’t force pregnancy or birth. Why would you want people who don’t want children to have children? That seems like a recipe for disaster.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:03 PM
2

Why would I troll? Go back and read my post history. I’m not a bot. I don’t use condoms. They’re uncomfortable and I’m not fine with that. She used to have a high sex drive, but it’s gone down to 4 nights a week, which I’m fine with. She’s on anxiety medication to help treat the anxiety and depression. I’m fine with that. If I was a troll, why would I say that I can understand why women would want a side effect free option?
/r/MensRights12/08/25 03:35 PM
3

I can understand why women would be upset that they’re expected to take a pill that has a pamphlet filled with side effects that are a mile long, while male birth control is not approved for the market because of those same side effects. My wife is on the pill. I’ve read the pamphlet. I wish she didn’t have to be on the pill because since she went on them she became depressed, had to go on anxiety medication, and her sex drive decreased dramatically; but, condoms aren’t for married men. Lol. I d…
/r/MensRights12/08/25 03:08 PM
0

When you start a post with “my wife loves to,” and then proceed to bitch and whine about “bitchy and whiny women” the message comes off as “I don’t want my wife watching those shows because she’ll turn into a bitchy and whiny feminist woman.”
/r/MensRights25/07/25 07:27 PM
-6

She has the right to watch whatever show she wants to watch. That’s my opinion. If she’s an adult, she can watch the shows she wants to watch. Doesn’t matter if he doesn’t approve of them. Lmao. It’s not his call to make.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:56 PM
-8

And what exactly would you have him do? Ban her from watching shows she enjoys? Should she be given the same consideration if he watches shows she doesn’t agree with?
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:45 PM
-9

If you don’t like a show, you don’t have to watch it. The show’s producers aren’t holding a weapon to your head. It doesn’t have to be that deep. There are plenty of shows that I like that my wife doesn’t and vice versa. We just watch them separately.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:03 PM
1

Just to add. How am I not reasonable? It’s reasonable to expect grown adults to make their own choices. It’s not my fault if they make irresponsible ones.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:08 PM
3

Lmao. Someone woke up in the mood to be a keyboard warrior today. I’m evil for wanting people to be held accountable for their own choices? What does that make you? Some knight in shining armor? When did I say we should remove abortion as an option? I said I don’t agree with it being used as birth control, I never said it should be removed as an option. I said people should be accountable. If they’re accountable enough for sex, they’re accountable enough to deal with the consequences of their ow…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:06 PM
2

No. We live in a society that wants to have its cake and eat it too. It is a biological truth that sexual intercourse leads to procreation. You speak as though sex is as necessary to humans as water, food, or shelter is. It’s not. You say it’s unrealistic to abstain from sex even when you aren’t responsible enough to handle its consequences. It’s not. You just want an answer that’s going to reinforce this idea that it’s fine to sleep with whoever you want without having to face consequences that…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:46 PM
1

I’m uneducated because I expect adults to take responsibility and accountability for their choices? Odd take. Sex is 100% consent to a pregnancy. Abstinence is the only 100% way to prevent pregnancy. If you can’t handle a child, don’t have sex. Or, if you want to have sex, have sex with someone who isn’t of childbearing age (menopausal). It doesn’t take a nuclear physicist to put this one together. Even if you use condoms, birth control, etc.. the only way to 100% prevent an unwanted child, is t…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:06 PM
2

Are you asking if a man is raped should he be responsible for the child? No. I don’t believe a victim of incest or rape is responsible for a child born from that incest or rape. Medical issues brought on by pregnancy aren’t a consideration for a man, so that choice would ultimately fall with the woman. If she wants to give her life for the child, that’s her choice. If she doesn’t want to give her life for the child, that’s her choice. If the unborn is going to die during or shortly after birth, …
/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:16 PM
2

Respectfully, it’s not unrealistic. If you can’t keep it in your pants around women you have no intentions of having children with, don’t cry about an unplanned pregnancy. It may be lost to most of the people in modern-day-society; but, there is such a thing as common sense. If you’re old enough to be consenting to having sex, you’re old enough to know where babies come from. Don’t want to have a kid? Cool. Don’t provide your DNA for a short lived dopamine / serotonin rush.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 12:44 PM
3

I’m against abortion as birth control. I’m pro abortion for medical reasons, rape, incest, or other uncontrollable circumstances.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 12:34 PM
2

Lmao. If you can’t afford condoms, you definitely can’t afford kids, and shouldn’t be having sex. Does it seem like everyone has lost common sense? It’s crazy, dude.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 12:03 PM
-5

Here’s a wild theory - don’t have sex with someone you wouldn’t be willing to raise a child with. Does everyone need to turn a molehill into a mountain? It’s not that serious. If you can’t imagine having children with someone, don’t have sex with them. Regardless of birth control, pregnancies happen. The only way to 100% prevent a pregnancy is abstinence. If you can’t handle a child, don’t have sex. People who aren’t responsible enough to be an adult and raise a child they helped create, man or …
/r/MensRights25/06/25 11:51 AM
2

And, just to add, he fell into deep Red Pill territory right around the time he got married. He wasn’t always as harsh as he is now. His parents had a messy divorce right around the same time as his wedding and it caused some familial issues (his mother didn’t go to his wedding because his father was going to be in attendance). He hates his mom, and in turn, now seems to hate his wife and his daughters. Again, not my monkeys, not my circus, just trying to offer some advice so OP can see multiple…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 05:31 PM
1

He has his issues. I’ve tried talking to him about his approach; but, at the end of the day, not my monkeys, not my circus. I feel bad for his wife and kids; but, again, it’s not my business. Would I take the same approach? Absolutely not. My wife has struggled with weight (due to hormone problems and an underlying medical issue, not pregnancy). I’m a firm believer in offering support, not criticism.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 05:14 PM
12

I don’t think it’s wrong to have preferences for a significant other; however, how you approach making those preferences a reality is where the cracks can start to show. Have a buddy who used to belittle his wife about her weight after she had children (to the point she would also end up in tears). But, wouldn’t watch the kids for an hour so she could lose weight healthily. She developed an eating disorder, looks like a bag of bones, and compulsively works out for hours a day now that the kids a…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 11:00 AM
0

I see we’re trying to throw mud now? Cool. Based on your post history, you’re a keyboard warrior incapable of self-confidence, optimism, charm, or spark. You’re the type or person with all the basement bravado in the world, but nothing to show for it.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 10:48 AM
-5

Height fetishism isn’t a new thing. I’ve been made fun of, picked last for sports, rejected, etc. for my height since I was a child, and I’m 35 now. Yes, dating apps are huge nowadays, but they aren’t the end-all-be-all that everyone makes them out to be. The point being, who cares if Tinder makes a new filter? It weeds out all the women who are concerned with minor details. Those aren’t women you would want to associate yourself with anyways. They’re doing you a favor by not swiping on you. If …
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:35 PM
-11

Why does it matter? Y’all take this height thing way too seriously. I’m a shorter man (5’7) and my wife is a taller woman (5’11). Does my wife care? No. I’m healthy and that’s all that she cares about. I’m never gonna be taller than her, that’s fine with me. Being a smaller man, my wife weighs more than me and we fit in the same clothes. Do I care? No. She’s healthy and that’s all that I care about. Even if she was as thin as a rail, she’s never gonna weigh less than me and be healthy. If you fi…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:57 PM
1

Bro, what are you talking about? Feminism had its place at one time. Yes, women were traditionally expected to stay at home and care for the children while the man went to work. Most women didn’t even have access to higher education. Princeton and other similar universities didn’t allow women to attend until around 1969. Feminism had its place at one time, it’s not the feminism you encounter today. At one time, it was more about equality than modern feminism is today. Don’t come in and hijack my…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:18 PM
1

Dude, I literally said that I believe in equality. No. I think men and women should contribute equally to the home, both monetarily and otherwise. Feminism had its place at one time when women were trying to step into the workplace so they could also contribute monetarily. Women should work, as should men. I don’t agree with the modern view of feminism.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:18 PM
1

I believe in equality, as does my wife. My wife was actually the person who introduced me to this sub because we both thought feminism was starting to get out of hand in numerous ways. Both my wife and I have careers, we both contribute to the household, and, if we ever have children, we will both be 100% involved in their upbringing. If my wife is pregnant and/or postpartum, will I pitch in a bit more during the recovery process? Of course; however, we’ve both discussed expectations and found c…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:08 PM
1

Again, where exactly does my religion come into this? And to say someone who has faith lives in a vacuum chamber when you don’t know that person on a personal level… really? I don’t have a hive mind. I make my choices based on what I feel is right and what I feel is wrong, not just my religion. I found religion after I went thru an extremely challenging period in my life. You’re disgusting for talking down about a person’s faith when it has no direct impact on you. I didn’t bring my religion int…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:28 PM
2

Acting selfishly is not in the best interest of your children. Being present 100% of the time is in the best interest of your children. You think your children only deserve some of your time? You’re lazy, self-centered, and entitled. As I said earlier, you want your cake and to eat it too.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:01 PM
1

I’m not sure why my religion comes into this, but, yes, I have a faith. I’m a Lutheran. No, the world isn’t about showing off materialistic things, but, don’t you want to provide the absolute best for your children. Are the schools in the higher end area not better than the schools in the lower income neighborhoods where you live? Don’t you want to give your children the world? Parenthood is a 24/7 gig. Not a part time job. You’re acting selfishly, and if you can’t see that, I don’t know what el…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 11:47 AM
1

And are we really going to relate the blessing of fatherhood with the travesties that occur in a war? Come on.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 11:31 AM
3

Clearly, if the best you can offer your children is a part time parent, you weren’t meant to be a father. You’re crying because you have to work full time to provide for your family? Welcome to the real world. Enslave yourself? You have children, man. It’s not about you anymore. The minute you have children, it’s about your children, not you. Take a moment to reflect on yourself. If you think you can be a good father when you literally want to pick and choose when you act as a father, you’re sad…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 11:26 AM
2

Just to add - Why post this here? Do you know how many countless men I see on this sub and the Guy Cry sub who would literally die to be able to find a nice woman and have the opportunity to be a father? And not just a father that blows in with the wind, but an actual father. Like I said, this whole idea is a little gross, man.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 10:52 AM
5

Can we just call this what it is? You want the benefits that come with having a family, while still having the freedom of a bachelor. You want to be able to pick and choose which days you’re a father to your own children. You want to be able to pick and choose which days you’re a husband. You want to have your cake and eat it too. Honestly, this is a little gross. Why did you bother having children with this woman if you wanted to have an out every time things got a little tough? You want her to…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 10:42 AM
12

If your sister didn’t lie or exaggerate the situation, she isn’t in the wrong here. Approaching anyone in the workplace (whether male or female) with a pamphlet regarding political, religious, or moral views is the opposite of professional. Don’t discuss political views, religion, or moral views in the workplace. It’s not the time nor the place; and, to be frank, is a little weird. How would you feel if a woman approached you with a pamphlet that more or less criticized you directly? Something t…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:27 AM
1

Just to add on - I don’t agree with it. It’s just the meaning behind the full message from the feminist point of view.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:51 PM
0

Edit - traditional women
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:50 PM
3

There’s actually more to the saying. “Barefoot in the winter, and pregnant in the summer.” It implies that she “can’t run away” in the winter without freezing, but also “can’t run away” in the summer because she’s pregnant. Pretty much, it’s used to imply a hostage situation for transitional women.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:49 PM
2

I think it depends on the man. But, just because I feel like you’re looking for examples from a man- I feel loved when my wife gives me physical affection (hugs, kisses, cuddles) and allows me to “be the man” in the relationship. We (my wife and I) struggled with this for a bit early on in our relationship. I communicated to her that I would appreciate if she let me open the door for her, if she ask me for help when she’s carrying something heavy, etc.. I need to feel needed to feel loved, and s…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:45 PM
1

I’m a man. I know men aren’t sex driven machines. I’m also a married man who took the time to educate myself on female physiology so that my wife and I could have a good sex life long term. Have you never heard of compromise? Is foreplay my favorite part of sex? No, but, it’s my wife’s favorite part. Does my wife like giving me head? I doubt it, but she does and even had me teach her what I like because I enjoy it. I love my wife, and I would assume my wife loves me seeing as she supported me th…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 04:17 PM
1

It’s important for a woman to have foreplay. Sex isn’t enjoyable for a woman who isn’t aroused, and foreplay is an essential part of arousal. If you want to be inside of a woman without causing her physical discomfort, yes, foreplay is essential. The vaginal canal is sensitive. Too much friction and not enough lubrication, and you aren’t gonna get far with her.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 03:01 PM
1

Women can definitely orgasm. If you focus on how her body is reacting (both externally and internally) you can tell the difference between a woman’s real orgasm versus a fake one.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:46 PM
4

Just to add. I’m not saying it’s right to say men are bad at sex; but, it did the job of getting attention.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 11:18 AM
-2

Ideally, yes, the message would be “women take more time to feel satisfied during sex.” However, that’s not exactly a headline that’s going to get attention. If the running story is “men are bad at sex,” men are going to be more invested in proving he’s good in bed, and thus, more likely to take the time to satisfy the woman. If the running story is “women take more time to be satisfied,” it doesn’t have the same impact on the male ego, and it doesn’t grab male attention to the same degree.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 11:17 AM
4

I don’t think men are bad at sex; but a lot of men don’t understand female physiology and what feels good to a woman. Depending on where a woman is at in her menstrual cycle, her internal physiology changes. Her cervix moves up and down depending on when she menstruates and ovulates. It also is more sensitive at certain times than others, making rough sex uncomfortable sometimes, whereas other times, it’s enjoyable. Men don’t really have to think about navigating that, because our anatomy doesn’…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 11:02 AM
1

If sperm was anonymously donated, how would the father invest emotionally in the upbringing of a child? He doesn’t get the choice to interact with an anonymously born child. The majority of those who choose to use sperm donors have no intention of ever contacting the sperm donor. Those who use sperm donors are usually women okay with being single mothers, people of the LGBTQ community, or couples struggling with infertility. Sure, I agree you would procreate without guilt, financial obligation, …
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:10 AM
3

What an odd take. If I’m going to ask a woman to take my name (I have, and she did), she’s damn well going to be known as a member of my family. How would you explain this to your children? “Son, I just want you to know that, while you’re my family, your mother is not and never will be.” Don’t you think that could cause some animosity in the home? If you don’t want your woman to be your family, don’t get married and don’t expect her to have your children. Grow up. Don’t use whatever trauma you c…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 11:13 PM
1

I didn’t read the original post as being combative.
/r/MensRights30/04/25 06:59 PM
-4

OP didn’t do that in the original post. That was a reaction to responses they received. I think anyone (male or female) might get defensive if a question is asked and they’re told to GTFO. I get it if they had started the conversation in a combative manner. That’s different But, when you give a response (not you personally) like “We aren’t your supply love, run along now” to a question that at least indicates that the OP may have potential for growth, you could be turning them off to the idea co…
/r/MensRights30/04/25 06:40 PM
-3

Troll or not, I do know that feminists scroll through this forum. Some who are on or close to the fence use these posts to gain perspective. I was actually introduced to this forum by my wife, who, through positive interactions she’s seen, has moved away from feminist views she had when we first met. Whether this person is or isn’t a troll isn’t the point. By creating a forum where productive discussions can occur and questions can be asked, we’d be opening the door for those women who might be …
/r/MensRights30/04/25 05:57 PM
1

Don’t get me wrong, I like a nice BJ too; but, to tell someone to go back to their chamber when they’re at least making an attempt to see things from the other side seems counterproductive. Is it not possible that being kind and informative would be more productive than shooting a curious person down? How can we expect feminists to open their eyes if we can’t even have a non-combative discussion with each other?
/r/MensRights30/04/25 05:32 PM
-6

Dude, touch grass. She’s being honest, she’s trying to start a conversation, and at least making an attempt to understand from a different point of view. We want women to care about men and their issues, right? How could she even start to care if you immediately shut her down without even offering something constructive? She asked a question. If you don’t have advice, just ignore the post. You don’t have to be nasty to someone who’s at least making some sort of attempt. OP - just to throw this o…
/r/MensRights30/04/25 05:15 PM
1

OP literally asked for a woman’s opinion on the matter. I provided a woman’s opinion. If you don’t want to see a woman’s opinion, you could have stopped reading after I said “not a woman, but asked my wife’s opinion on the matter.” I wouldn’t have provided a woman’s perspective if the OP didn’t literally ask for one in the post.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:22 PM
1

I never implied that the idea isn’t antiquated. It very much is an antiquated viewpoint; but is still one pushed by most political parties. Progressives push the idea that “all men are shit” unless you’re a die-hard feminist. Conservatives push the idea that “men aren’t worth shit if they don’t meet the standards of their ideal male.” Both men and women are valuable assets when it comes to reproduction. I’m not denying that. But, with this huge worldwide trend of governments panicking about a fa…
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:15 PM
12

I think you might have a hard time finding a political party in the US that doesn’t openly support women more so than men. In the eyes of the government, women are more valuable because they are the ones who birth children. Women can only have 1 healthy pregnancy a year. Men can impregnate hundreds of women a year if it came down to an absolute necessity. The government needs children to keep the wheels spinning. If we don’t have enough workers, we don’t have a strong / growing economy, blah, bl…
/r/MensRights16/04/25 06:32 PM
3

Not a woman, but asked my wife’s opinion on the topic. This was her advice… You’re entitled to your opinion and allowed to make critiques. If you don’t agree with the arguments presented in the research document, present your own argument with facts and reliable and trustworthy sources. Keywords: reliable and trustworthy. Be respectful when presenting your argument. You don’t need to go on a “blaze of glory” rant in your paper to share a viewpoint. We’re all entitled to our opinions and perspect…
/r/MensRights16/04/25 06:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter