TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StuWard Archive

View 2 posts and 164 comments by StuWard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm curious why the names are different. Do you have any published sources connecting the woman to this?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:03 PM
23

i'm not sure I agree about who was destroyed there. Yiannopoulos comes across as an ass. All he's really said is that you can't trust anything he says.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 04:06 PM
3

It's invented by Toxic Feminists.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:42 PM
7

The way I think of it is that in both cases it's a learned condition. I don't think being born a man is inherently toxic, not is being born a woman, but both seem to be able to become toxic.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 07:30 PM
41

Do the teach toxic feminism too?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 05:13 PM
14

Make them non-friends.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 07:05 PM
-1

Can you really have one without the other? Does it have to be us or them? If you favour one over the other you will never have real equality.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:39 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alimony
/r/MensRights31/10/16 04:58 PM
1

I think that someone got their nose out of joint because I was focusing on behaviour and not biology. I do think there are steps people can take to improve their risk of dying young but some people don't wan to hear that, which ironically proves my point.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:47 PM
1

I don't know why this was down-voted, you asked for reasons and I gave them, and I though I gave a good answer. I agree that feminists are wrong on the issue. Men's problems don't get near the attention that they need. Much of that is due to the self-sacrificing nature of men. It's "unmanly" to complain.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:29 PM
1

There are lots of reasons. Part of it is that the traditional role of men is to protect women, who in turn protect children. That means they tend to ignore their own well being for the sake of the family. They put themselves in danger, take risks, fight battles, etc. In modern days, they tend to have more heart attacks and disease in general, along with substance abuse and suicides, mainly because they spend too much time in the fight or flight mode and under chronic stress. This can be resolved…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:15 PM
1

The advice given isn't very helpful. It sounds like depression to me. This person needs counseling.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:30 PM
1

Surya Mudra Ok. sure.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:55 PM
1

What about shocker decals on the back window of your car?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:30 PM
1

You'll need to learn to twitter.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:32 PM
1

I think that as individuals, we need to speak up when we see something like this. Simply expressing disapproval when we see transgressions, will eventually get people thinking that maybe there is a better way to behave.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:26 PM
1

That's a problem with today's media. They tend to break down the barrier between what's normal and what's extreme, since that's what attracts viewers. I think that you will see this happen more and more. Politics are already in the toilet, the rest of society will follow.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:14 PM
1

Yes, it's stereotyping. No, it's not OK. Yes, it got attention in the Republican debates but that whole thing was childish.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:08 PM
3

I think it's a way of saying that it looks like someone is compensating for a lack in some other area. Short people get that all the time but if a man isn't short, then there must be another reason for his choice in cars, his attitude or whatever else someone has an issue with. I certainly don't condone the practice, just suggesting a possible reason.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:04 PM
1

That was my thought but the article I posted and the other gentleman said that women life insurance were higher. I'm fully in agreement with your assessment.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:27 PM
0

The link I posted in my first comment that I gave as background of what people call Pink tax. Term insurance was an example of where women paid more.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:10 PM
0

The original post said term insurance.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:44 PM
2

That's odd. We took out insurance when my wife was pregnant with our first child about 25 years ago. Her's was lower based on her life expectancy being higher. That's in Canada. Maybe it's different here.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:23 PM
1

It means I have no data on the others. It could be true pr it could be BS too.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:19 AM
3

I'm not defending anything.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:42 AM
9

Here's some background on the pink tax. https://www.listenmoneymatters.com/the-pink-tax/ I kew about haircuts but I assumed that was related to complexity. I know it takes my wife two hours to get her hair done and it takes me 15 minutes. I call bullshit on the insurance though. Women live longer and insurance is cheaper, or at least it was the last time my wife and I bought insurance.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:10 AM
4

It's not my country but in my opinion, both Clinton and Trump could ruin the country (which really means it's already ruined) but I think Trump is the most dangerous.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 06:05 PM
68

“incapable of giving consent due to intoxication”. That's not the same as being drunk. In the case that triggered the law, the woman was passed out. However there are definitely legal issues that need to be addressed. minimum prison term That's the part I have the most issue with. I think that minimum sentences should be done away with. That removes the judges judgement out of the equation.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:15 PM
2

It's a qualitative fact.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:25 PM
1

My point is that both cases could be accommodated if they were handled properly. I blame the monks for the airline issue and the airline made it worse in how they handled it.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:00 PM
1

The difference is in how it was done. If they monks had given their preference ahead of time or paid for the seat beside them, there would have been no issue. The gym issue is different. Many women feel uncomfortable working out around men, for normal reasons, not specifically religious. For marketing reasons, it makes sense to accommodate them and many gyms have women only sections or hours.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:50 AM
2

It's a barbaric practice.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:35 AM
1

Of course it's possible. The real question is whether it would be possible to prove it in court. Your right that the problem is in how rape is defined.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 10:01 PM
1

I heard this on the radio yesterday and thought readers here would appreciate it.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:12 PM
8

I would rather see a woman make these kinds of arguments. A female researcher in Canada was on CBC radio yesterday saying much the same thing. I can't find the Transcript but I think it was on the 180 show. However, I did find a transcript of another issue important here so I posted it separately.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:11 PM
-4

That's not disingenuous. It's called putting risk in perspective. Refugees are not dangerous.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 09:11 PM
-1

No they wouldn't but they would be included in the 100,000 base. Also I used the 2014 rate which is the lowest ever. Louisiana had a rate of 10.3. I'm not the only one that noticed this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_crime#United_States A majority of studies in the U.S. have found lower crime rates among immigrants than among non-immigrants, and that higher concentrations of immigrants are associated with lower crime rates.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 08:11 PM
3

I actually agree. Elsewhere in this thread we are talking about poverty.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 06:24 PM
3

All taxation is redistribution of a sort. I look at how most fortunes were made and all depend on the advantages given to them by society and many depend on violence, theft or dubious morality at some point. I believe that there is a fair amount that should be taxed to offset societies contributions to income and that should be redistributed to citizens. Some suggest that all rent is immoral. Most wealthy people get most of their income from some sort of rent and not employment income. I don't t…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:36 PM
1

I'm vehemently opposed to the idea of a basic income. Why? I'm aware that some are afraid of lack of work ethic, or inflation, both are easy to refute. The other is in redistribution and I understand that some people have issues with that. To me that's a desirable feature.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:23 PM
3

It's like the native issue in Canada. Native men die more but they are also more violent. The real issue is how to correct that. Dignity and respect are critical but economics is also critical. I frequent /r/basicincome largely because I think that is the mechanism to correct all these problems in a dignified way.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:13 PM
0

Yes, for the whole year, whites accounted for about half the killings, blacks about 1/4. Other races made up the rest. Still, young black men died at a higher rate than others, even in not higher in absolute terms.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 03:53 PM
5

Yes, they were trying to justify their decision that was made without consideration of all the facts.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:43 PM
1

no white women were killed by police I find that hard to believe. There was a white women killed just this week. http://www.click2houston.com/news/deputy-involved-shooting-leaves-woman-dead-in-spring Here's the 2015 link. There are lots of women, many white. http://www.killedbypolice.net/kbp2015.html
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:13 PM
16

This reminds me of the situation in Canada. They are investigating missing and murdered aboriginal women but ignoring the men even though it's a bigger problem. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/national-inquiry-should-not-study-violence-against-aboriginal-men-experts/article28498467/
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:10 PM
1

It was a Nazi meme in 1938. That doesn't make any of it OK. It's interesting the response about the size of the bowl and the resulting analysis. You are actually safer meeting a refugee on the street than meeting an American. The murder rate of the former is about 1 in 100,000 per year, the murder rate for the latter is 4.5 in 100,000 per year.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:52 AM
3

I'm in Canada. I'm not going guess what barbaric practices take place in other countries. If its the cultural, medical, religious norms, its not the parents fault. In fact, my comment had nothing to do with this, it was about relationships with parents and misplaced anger. He should direct his anger towards educating the current generation of new parents.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 03:30 PM
1

Is it too late to say "no pun intended"?
/r/MensRights09/09/16 03:08 PM
2

You don't have to be patronizing. "get over it" was my initial thought and I wrote it down at the time. It is still valid. if the OP finds it condescending, then he can say so. At least then I know that he read it. People seem to be far to sensitive about this. (actually he did reply but he equates them doing what they thought was right with not being "good parents")
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:16 PM
2

Parents get to and need to decide what is best for their children. As a parent I take that responsibility seriously. Sometimes children have a hard time understanding that. Adults get that, children don't. I'm not trying to define adulthood but this is something that adults tend to understand as self-evident.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:14 PM
1

It's immature to hold a grudge against someone for doing something they thought was right. If you think this is dismissive shit, you need to grow up too. I'm not saying to trivialize his condition, I'm saying to bury the hatchet and fix his relationship with his parents.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:00 PM
2

His relationship with his parents should not be defined by this event. If he has an issue, deal with it, I agree it's not nothing, but don't blame his parents for doing what they thought was right. That is being an adult and the OP is not being an adult.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 01:57 PM
2

I don't know how much research there was 20 years ago, I gather that is common in this thread.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:21 PM
1

exactly.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:19 PM
1

Following standard medical advice is not standing for your kids? You don't parent by using information that is not available to you at the time.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:19 PM
2

Most parents should be following the advice of their doctors and this was standard advice at the time. This is not their fault and the OP should not be carrying a grudge over this. He should direct his anger and making sure that current parents don't make the same mistake and make sure he takes care of his own children with the best information he has.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:17 PM
2

It's part of being a functional family. You forgive each other. That's what functional families do. Have you never made a mistake in good faith? Wouldn't you expect some understanding and forgiveness.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:14 PM
-1

Fuck you too.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:13 PM
2

What I really want to say is "Grow Up". Parents have a right and duty to look after their kids and if sometimes they make a mistake, that's to be expected. Nothing they do is unforgivable if they do it in good faith. Given the abuse that some parents pile on their kids, this is nothing. The OP needs to put this in perspective and embrace his parents. At his age he's well past the point where he should be carrying grudges. They will be coming to the point here they are going to need his support, …
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:12 PM
2

They did what they thought was right and was common practice at the time they did it. Get over it. Edit: From the comments, this needs clarification. "Get over it" is the most important part of my message. By "get over it" I'm not talking about your medical condition. That is real and you need to deal with it medically as appropriate between you and your doctor. What you need to "get over" is your holding a grudge with your parents for doing something they though, in good faith" was the right th…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:06 PM
1

It's too broad a question with no specifics. No one can answer this. However it's a risk you take just by being a man. You can minimize the risk by establishing mutual trust and respect ahead of time. Until then, always have a witness.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 06:29 PM
3

By default, you're wrong.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 05:49 PM
3

I have a 25 year old and she's still my kid. She always will be.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 08:59 PM
3

This kids has problems and needs counseling but having a social media war is not going to fix things. This is your daughter and a what you're getting into will forever warp your relationship with her and her self esteem, whatever she has left. You need to heal your relationship, not further destroy it.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:03 PM
5

That's fine if they don't want men's input into their experience, but that means they are not entitled to input into our experience, and since we need to work together, that doesn't leave much room for interaction does it?
/r/MensRights28/08/16 02:04 AM
1

Pretty sure I saw this here recently.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:14 PM
3

I'm sure it's not hard to find anecdotes. I was just asking if there was statistical evidence. I have a thing about memes in general. They need to be backed up with data. There's too much misinformation out there.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 11:41 AM
3

You gave a statement you disagreed with but have given no evidence except for your assertion. Do you have actual statistics to back up your statement? I'm not saying I disagree with you, just that I would like to see the statistics. Edit: A brief search around found this: http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/12/the-real-complex-connection-between-single-parent-families-and-crime/265860/ It appears that growing up in a stable 2 parent household is important.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 11:20 AM
27

A couple drinks doesn't make you drunk. However, if she is drunk, however, the courts define that, you could be found guilty of rape. That's why this is frequently discussed here. It's a very unfair and unequal situation.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:54 AM
1

You should always try to resolve a dispute at the lowest level and then escalate as you need to. However I would engage legal advice as soon as things go public.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 05:53 PM
3

She doesn't understand statistics.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:20 PM
1

I knew that. Did you read the comments on the other subreddit that this was posted too?
/r/MensRights15/08/16 06:55 PM
1

I really don't think boys get an easier ride after leaving school. The still die younger that women. That's not happening because life is easier for men.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 06:45 PM
2

You would think that it would be even more important for that reason. Would all 4 have to be in agreement?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 12:50 PM
1

Are those all standard Ken dolls? Can you provide dates and any other details you have on them? It is interesting how they have changes and it would be nice to have this documented.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 11:54 AM
2

All issues are important regardless of other unrelated issues. It's not an either/or situation. Worrying about refugees is not preventing you from looking after veterans, for example. Gender pay gap and self defense are unrelated issues. In this case, it's important to understand what makes up gender pay gap. Some parts of the gap are legitimate and some are not. It needs to be sorted out so the illegitimate issues can be addressed.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 05:52 PM
1

Nice quotes and they make sense in their own way however they dont address the question of why collective responsibility is only applied to men. It doesn't. It applies to everyone. I'm not saying that women don't have responsibility, just that we need to address what we can affect, take responsibility for what we can change. I used those quotes to illustrate that this concept is not new, it's been around for ages. If something is wrong, speak up and say so. If some men are being creeps, call the…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:36 PM
1

I agree the comments in the link are inappropriate. That "experiment" is a passive aggressive way to exert dominance and it's no more correct that telling women they should stay home. Dignity should be the overriding principle though.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:27 PM
1

Are you saying that without polite men to set and example other men will somehow default to being creeps? Sort of. Creeps will be creeps. They need to be constrained. Polite men are the ones that can do that. It's not that polite men will automatically turn into creeps, but by ignoring that behavior is essentially condoning it and it will expand. Such expectation isnt made of any other group in regards to any other crime. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do not…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 02:31 PM
1

Because the person you replied to doesnt treat women as special he is a part of the problem? I didn't say he had to treat them special, but dignity is essential and that's what my comment was about. Dignity works both ways. I disagree with some of the activities and attitudes that women have too. However, this is Men's Rights. We're not going to change women's behavior here, but we can and should consider our own.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 02:25 PM
1

True
/r/MensRights05/08/16 12:24 PM
1

This is something that needs to be taken seriously and in most cases, isn't even on people's radar. Patrick Swayze is likely the most obvious example of an abused husband, but he can't speak up anymore.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 12:17 PM
1

I don't have to treat women with any dignity that they do not treat men back with. You're part of the problem. Setting the example works in many ways. It shows the creeps how they should behave. It reminds other polite men that they have a responsibility and they are not alone, and it tells women that not all men are creeps and they can and should be able to be comfortable around most men.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 12:09 PM
1

If polite men don't take the lead and set the example, the creeps will have no one to emulate and they will eventually take over. Polite men are the only ones that can actually make a difference.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 12:05 PM
1

Most men are polite and some are overly aggressive. If all men were polite and treated women with dignity, this wouldn't be an issue. This is really aimed at the creepy or aggressive dominant alpha male who isn't going to pay attention anyway, but maybe polite men can set the example and it will get noticed.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:43 AM
1

That's not entirely true. He could be just saying whatever he thinks will mitigate his punishment. If he says that he raped because he's a bad person that has no sense of right or wrong or that he just wanted to exert control over his victim, things might go worse for him. However, the statement in the picture can also be false. Rape does require a rapist.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 05:47 PM
1

I'm not an ocean away, I'm in Canada, but I really have no idea. I'm in the military and I know we have programs to help people with issues and looking after your buddy, etc, but the among the general public, it's particularly hard to reach people. It seems that teenagers and young adults are most noticeably at risk, but apparently it's middle aged men that have the most numbers. I think there is a culture of men not wanting to show weakness so they keep their issues to themselves.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:47 PM
1

I can believe it. There was a suicide in my neighborhood this week. Looking back, there were several over the last few years and it's a small community. It affects everybody, especially when it's a youngster. We've had a few of those.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:26 PM
3

That's actually true. There are about 4000 suicides a year in Canada, 3/4 are male. That means 1 every 3 hours is pretty close. Whether they are largely due to rape accusations is something else. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-624-x/2012001/article/11696-eng.htm
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:12 PM
-7

That's really for the courts to decide.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:08 PM
1

I'm speaking in general.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:21 AM
1

Today men must sign up for selective service when they register to vote That's because of the draft and has nothing to do with sufferage. I'm sure if there was some other way to force men to register, they would use it. We have no draft in Canada so this is only in your country and not universal.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 06:45 PM
1

I'm increasingly of the view that the nuclear deferent is a waste of money. I'm fully in agreement here. There needs to be a global disarmament process with the goal of eliminating all nuclear weapons completely and permanently. In the meantime, leaders need to be prepared to use them, and most importantly, be seen to be willing to use them if needed, otherwise, they are not a deterrent. And the only real reason to use them is if someone else used them first.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:48 PM
10

There's no point in having a nuclear deterrent if the person at the top is not prepared to use it. Even if he/she is not prepared to use it, the perception that he is, is paramount to the validity of the deterrent. This says more of the morality of he predecessors than it does about her. Sir Geoffrey Howe, who was Foreign Secretary in the closing years of the cold war, said it was a question no prime minister should ever answer directly. Sir Geoffrey is an ass. Without being asked, Jeremy Corbyn…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:47 AM
2

There is nothing about skirt height that implies consent to be harassed.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:45 PM
3

I have no interest in HAES, Feminism or Marxism but the idea that they would borrow ideas from one another is not evidence of some grand conspiracy.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:22 AM
2

Just because a movement borrows concepts and language from another movement, doesn't mean the two are related.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:12 AM
1

Like I said, I didn't watch the video. Maybe you can enlighten me of some of the arguments that were valid then and now, even if they didn't adequately describe the situation then but now do.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:46 PM
1

Also if you don't mind me asking, how did you find this post? I've subscribed here for a long time. I also read many science, economic and Canadian politic sub-reddits. I don't always agree with what is said, but these are all issues I keep abreast of.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:41 PM
2

I don't think it's really fair to shrug off all of the gap is being due to discrimination. I never said that. What I said was that discrimination was very real in the 70s and some may still exist.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:37 PM
1

I can't say anything about the video because I can't see it, but discrimination was very real in the 70s and earlier. It has improved and is probably mostly gone but I'm sure many women would disagree with me on that point. The fact that your video from the 70s uses the same argument now shows that the argument was likely bogus then and would still be bogus. I'm sure some of the arguments for the gap are likewise obsolete. I think that if you compare experience to experience, education to educat…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:13 PM
14

There's nothing wrong with pie charts the way the OP used them. They do tend to get used inappropriately though.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:37 PM
1

They don't remember when Whitney Houston died?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 10:11 PM
-4

But we're not chimpanzees,and a female chimp could rip you in two. So what?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:56 PM
1

I wasn't even considering bodybuilders or steroids but people have projected that onto me. I'm talking about social expectations and physical training.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:55 PM
1

This seems like an uninteresting and somewhat obvious statement. I thought so too, but it's what the original question asked.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:53 PM
1

Those are hormones that are naturally in your body, you don't need to add them, but yes, women respond to steroids, just like men do.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:50 PM
1

Ask the designer I mean whichever god you pray to. If that's biologists, great. Who designed you?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:49 PM
1

I'm not defending the wilks score, I was just giving an example.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:47 PM
0

The question was about social constructs. Time and effort spent on training is totally a social construct. Society expects men to spend time and effort of training and they are criticized as children if they are weak, or at least they were in my day. Today, they just play video games. If women were expected to become strong, they would be.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:46 PM
1

Fine, then you can conclude that small women are weaker if that makes you feel superior in some way.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:43 PM
0

Men on average have more muscle mass. That's true, but we weren't talking about averages, we were talking about potential,and biological vs social. Weren't men essentially designed... You should ask the designer.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:41 PM
1

I'll open a new can of worms now: http://bayesianbodybuilding.com/natural-muscular-potential-women/ It seems growth factors like IGF-1 and growth hormone take over the anabolic role that testosterone has in men.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:39 PM
1

I'm not a troll but I regret posting here. The question was biological vs social. Training is social, strength is related to training. We are in agreement that there are some obvious biological differences.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:37 PM
0

You're twisting my words. You know what I said earlier.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:34 PM
0

I didn't say equal. I said they have the potential to be similar after accounting for size and slightly higher essential body fat. It takes men decades to train for elite competition where women sometimes get to world class competition in 1-2 years of training. That's because fewer women go into strength sports. Over time, if strength competition becomes as popular as it is for men, the gap will get smaller.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:32 PM
1

So, no, I'm not wrong, we're just in violent agreement. There are differences that we both acknowledge, and those differences make up the difference in the elite class, hence the difference in the Wilks calculations that someone else was fixating on. Social norms makes up the difference in the general public since the general public doesn't take part in strength sports. That was the original question after all.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:25 PM
0

Smaller, but just as strong (after adjusting for essential fat). Right.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:17 PM
1

Apparently not.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:17 PM
1

The one I posted said 688, not 638. 638 was the Kg. The male record is 679.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:15 PM
1

I've added studies to support my theory. Note that women are shorter, and they carry more essential fat. Averages don't support that they are equal but comparing competitive powerlifters and weightlifters, lb for lb, women are very close. If all women trained the same way that men do, and acted the same way growing up, this pattern would be evident in the average person.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:13 PM
0

They are smaller and shorter on average than men, and they carry more essential fat than men do. Other than that, they can gain muscle just as well, and that muscle is just as strong as men's.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:09 PM
-1

I was responding to another posted who said I lied. It's up to him to prove me wrong. I was giving him a source to ask. I'll add evidence to my original post.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:54 PM
-2

In your opinion, but not in mine. Ask the question over at /r/powerlifting.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:48 PM
-2

If women train the same way as men, they can become as strong pound for pound after adjusting for their higher fat levels. For example, the highest Wilks in IPF History: https://www.reddit.com/comments/2m7o2z Edit: Because anecdotes and opinion are unimportant when you have the descenting opinion: Muscle is muscle, and strength is associate with cross sectional area regardless of male or female: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8477683 Other relevant studies: The results indicate that neither …
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:41 PM
2

That's what I was thinking. And most construction works don't need a degree. The skilled ones get paid more than the unskilled but it seems to be the unskilled ones that get killed on the job. Danger really doesn't affect the wage much.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:52 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights01/04/16 03:25 PM
3

This of course is the whole point. It's a way to deflect attention away from the real problem. This is like carpet bombing Muslims and building a wall to keep out Mexicans. The rich want people to fight each other so they can continue unimpeeded. I think there was book that warned about stuff like this. 1984 rings a bell.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 01:51 PM
1

Does anyone have a non-video TL/DR? I can't watch video at work. Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 01:47 PM
2

We need to look out for each other.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 01:16 PM
2

That was US.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:00 PM
2

This got me looking and I found this: https://katatrepsis.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/incidence-over-age.jpg It's not so much a gender issue as an age issue. When young people get cancer, it's considered a bigger deal than when old people get it. That chart came from here: http://katatrepsis.com/2012/10/30/why-does-breast-cancer-research-receive-more-research-funding-than-prostate-cancer/ Notice that prostate cancer has had better results recently. It now kills less than breast cancer but that w…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:51 PM
1

At least have the opportunity for the parents to share the benefit and still have a job to go back to.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:47 AM
1

That's full time so the positive number in the 30s is trivial and it's probably due to women going back to work after staying home to raise kids. After 40, the women who stayed home and then go back to work afterwards never catch up and the numbers become significant. Those women skew the overall wage gap. The answer is to give everyone a basic income.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:40 AM
2

I mean relative to the other democratic candidate, not relative to Republicans.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 09:25 PM
31

She's a friend to wealthy, powerful people so of course they're going to defend her against the evil socialist alternative.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:59 PM
1

If you read more you'll find a lot more fallacies.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 07:31 PM
2

I didn't watch either but it may have been due to the preference of the models.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 02:06 PM
2

Yes, insulting to both men and women. Edit: The word I was looking for was Misandry.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:39 PM
86

There was also something abouy lesbians touching penises. I'm sure this is art in someone's mind.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:06 PM
2

Marriage is a partnership, not a competition. Either they make it work or not. This isn't /r/relationships.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:19 AM
0

Don't buy a gun for home. Is it really worth pissing off your wife for something you don't really need? Unless you're a hunter or target shooting enthusist, there's really no point to owning one. You're more likely to kill a loved one or yourself than lose a loved one than to actually need it. If you like to shoot, maybe you can store a gun at the range. Sorry to the gun enthusiests out there. I like to shoot too, but I don't have a gun at home.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:36 PM
1

I added that tidbit in parentheses to clarify after you mentioned Maybe you need to read the rest of the posts before you criticize other posters.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:30 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer, one specializing in wrongful dismissal and workplace harrasment.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:45 PM
1

I don't question that. What I question is advice that someone gave to rush to the front of the line.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 06:40 PM
-9

Learning to being polite is worth learning, regardless if it upsets your concept of the proper order ot things. Obviously the school is trying to teach the kids something. Take it up with the shcool before you tell your kid to shove to the front of the line.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 06:28 PM
6

This article is over a year old: http://www.metronews.ca/news/canada/2014/08/22/aboriginal-men-murdered-at-higher-rate-than-aboriginal-women-statscan.html Rates for aboriginal men are about the same ratio to aboriginal women as men to women in the rest of society but aboriginals in general have a much higher rate. The problem is not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:11 PM
0

Thanks. Edit: From the days when being fit had a direct impact on survival, I assume that our cultural preference would be to associate with fitter people. You can consider this discrimination but it's really just natural selection. In the modern world, physical fitness is not required for survival but that doesn't mean our collective predisposition has changed.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:31 PM
5

I guess the reason I posted it here though was that size-ism is often seen as something that affects women and not men. This study is another piece of evidence that that is not the case. Agreed.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:30 PM
3

Is it really discrimination, or is it just that fit people look, and perhaps are, more capable and competent and therefore are treated with more respect?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:11 PM
2

/r/supplements may know better but in general, Reddit is not the place to get medical advice. Is your doctor not able to help?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:46 PM
1

Contact the moderators. I had that happen on one subreddit where a whole bunch of people were posting shit and my comment got wrapped up with the rest. Once I brought it to their attention they reinstated me.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:36 PM
1

Thanks for that. Now i'm paranoid.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 11:16 PM
1

It's also painless and quick. I had one after my third. The problem is that young men may not know that they don't want children, or they haven't found the woman they want to have children with yet. However, they have found a woman they want to have sex with. They need to take responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:33 PM
-3

That's a problem with your culture.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:25 PM
-1

Try and protect a woman you don't know and it's highly likely you can end up labeled as an aggressor That's a very cowardly view. First and foremost you should do what you believe is right. An then, mitigate the damage. if you're culture is that fucked up, you should be ashamed to be part of it.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:53 PM
-15

Obviously some men have trouble with controlling themselves.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 02:26 PM
-24

It should be up to men. Men should control themselves, know what consent is and also look out for their sisters and help make the campuses safer. Being a man used to mean protecting women. Something has gone wrong.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 02:20 PM
86

I hope she gets sued.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:36 PM
5

Sounds fair. Whatever you say here, like anywhere on the internet, is the same as saying it in public. Therefore, you should be prepared for differing opinions.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 01:05 PM
12

http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/reddit.com Relative to the general internet population, Males are under-represented at this site. Relative to the general internet population, Females are over-represented at this site. Confidence: high
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:35 PM
8

If you don't want to date someone, don't. The reason is your own business.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:50 PM
1

PM the moderators. I got banned from a subreddit just because of a misunderstanding and a lot of other banning going on that day. They quickly unbanned me.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:16 PM
3

Is this female privilege or just celebrity or money privilege?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 04:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter