TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Stuart523 Archive

View 1 post and 14 comments by Stuart523 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Stuart523/r/MGTOW18/02/16 07:26 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

A man wishes to replicate himself, genetically, like all other animals, and memetically. Either way one is taking one's likeness and projecting it into the outer world. Empowerment comes through control of what one has, then an increase in what one has. Growth is another way of describing empowerment, and this includes replication. There's little use having children who themselves won't have children, or while obviously carrying on one's genetics to some degree, won't carry on one's memetics. So…
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 11:28 PM
1

All else being equal and when appearing out of context, a smile denotes idiocy. High intelligence may not be the most important feature for attraction, but the lack of idiocy is. Often idiocy relates to a failure to develop character, something which may come later. A man is more likely to be willing to wait for a woman to develop character as she needs to, while women generally can't/couldn't afford to. What women don't want is a man that can be trusted or is overly attentive to social norms. O…
/r/MGTOW21/02/16 06:22 PM
1

It's not a pet belief of feminists that the vast majority of them are hypocritical for claiming children must be placed before the well being of men except when it comes to unborn children.
/r/MGTOW20/02/16 04:51 AM
1

It would be appreciated if you'd give any indication that you understand the argument. Thank you.
/r/MGTOW19/02/16 01:27 AM
1

As said, one simply compares the perceived costs to the benefits. The perceptions of others or the broader impact of society needn't be part of this, but it could. Let's leave them out momentarily, and so what we have is a procedure that one either finds to be symbolically unwanted or not, one is either concerned about the potential side-effects or not, one is either concerned about future indecision or not. Then one puts that up against concern for getting a woman pregnant. Something that's onl…
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 09:01 PM
1

When one posits something that is close to reality, he needs do little more afterwords, because the thing's proximity to reality acts as a self-defense of the accuracy of his original position. The farther from reality one's position is the more obfuscationally worded and obnoxious it needs to be. Having no bearing on our shared reality, except it's declaration of existence and communal nods, it must live and die by declarations and nods. When one says he's a highly intelligent animal, he speaks…
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 07:48 PM
1

This is like refusing to milk your cow then blaming your lack of dairy on her for not milking herself.
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 06:53 PM
2

Wilde's definition is just one way of defining it. But, at least he does define it. Most use the term with little thought in mind as to what an exact definition would be. Though, his definition, even if one would take it for being the most accurate, is still lacking when one delves into it. The fact is to live as one wishes is to impose oneself on others. Even if one isn't overtly stating that one wishes the others to change for him, his actions betray this. That one is a self is enough to prove…
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 06:48 PM
1

A very good poem. It speaks to most of the character traits I aspire towards. In this context, a few lines stood out: "If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same" "And never breathe a word about your loss" It's easier said than done, the question is not if a man can stifle his desire to speak of his losses or treat them as disasters, but if a man can agree that eventually being able to reach a stage where one can effectively control such desires is an a…
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 10:06 PM
1

Society runs on the ideology made and sustained by masculine/male thinkers of the past and present. This includes both the more liberal and conservative of ideologies. The trend towards feminization is based and sustained on the ideology of various masculine/male thinkers with their own varying agendas - feminine thinkers, male and female, have basically been little more than their pawns. One may argue that society is increasingly resembling a bee or ant hive, which truly are societies based on …
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 08:53 PM
3

All else being equal, when you take a man and woman, the woman has much less to do to meet her potential. She needs do little more than stay healthy. For men, on average, potential has far more evolved to be actualized in parallel with experiences, especially in a culture in line with his genetics. While, women, on average, can do little more than develop their phenotype with little conscious control of the process, men have much conscious control of the process. Which isn't to say that men can …
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 06:33 PM
2

Solitude isn't necessarily less pleasant or less productive than company.
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 06:21 PM
1

Women are less inclined to have actual personal values, that have been thought through, than men. This makes them closer to their primal nature. So women without proper guidance, would naturally be inclined towards the men closer to their primal nature.
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 05:31 PM
1

To give anyone or thing more credit than it deserves is to show favor to that person or thing. The societal cause is not vague. Women, on average, by nature try to integrate themselves into the dominate power, and men, and average, try to stand apart. This is due to reproductive necessities. With that in mind one can see how any homogenized, diverse society, or, in general, society without a purpose besides its own continuation, would be against masculinity. In moderns societies this often manif…
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 05:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter