TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Stuartiebloke Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by Stuartiebloke on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

You’re actually making sense though. That’s apparently not allowed on this sub.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:51 AM
1

This and the annual temper tantrum that Google doesn’t do a custom artwork for Men’s Day are good examples of this sub not having any legitimacy, which is annoying as occasionally people here can actually raise a valid point. However, those are usually overshadowed by the frequent posts about “Someone said something questionable on Twitter, therefore we’ll act as if literally everyone acts and thinks this way in order for us to feel like a persecuted class of people.”
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:49 AM
4

Men’s Rights?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 06:00 AM
1

How are those even comparable?
/r/MensRights24/10/18 02:20 AM
5

r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:43 PM
1

Thanks for admitting I’m right.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:28 PM
1

I thought this sub hated echo chambers?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:28 PM
1

... So in order to criticise the irrelevancy of posts in this sub, there needs to be a separate post relating to irrelevant posts being featured before I can make my thoughts heard. Instead of, you know, just criticising the pointless post directly. Are you usually this stupid or do you have to work at it?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:45 PM
1

Because I’m not blindly going along with everyone else suddenly constitutes as being off topic? Ok. Also, “Rage”? Hilarious.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:07 PM
1

“How is this Men’s Rights?” That’s literally how I started this. I’m still discussing this. Where have I gone topic?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:53 PM
1

Or maybe sticking to the actual topic could be of benefit?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:34 PM
1

Triggered? For raising issues with the fact that the sub blatantly doesn’t adhere to its purpose. Of course that’s unreasonable of me, I forgot. Fucks sake. There should be a sub for the discussion of Mens Rights now that you mention it, why not r/MensRights?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 01:54 AM
1

Still doesn’t explain how it’s a Men’s RIGHTS issue. What is being infringed upon? The impact of the male soldiers? No one is playing these games for accuracy. They want to have fun. Or rather they should be, over bitching about nontroveries incessantly.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 01:36 AM
1

So it’s unreasonable to expect a sub to talk about it’s subject? Fuck it, r/squaredcircle features UFC because they’re essentially the same thing, right?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:56 AM
1

“If you silenced the people not posting about the rights of men, you’d have very little left” Then later saying that the primary point of the subreddit is to discuss Men’s Rights, despite contradicting yourself by admitting that people don’t stick to that topic. What am I missing?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:09 AM
1

It’s the epitome of a nontroversy to me. I don’t care what my character is in Battlefield. Gameplay and function are most important and playing as a woman with a prosthetic arm does nothing to affect that.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:58 PM
-1

It’s Battlefield for Christ’s sake. No one is using it as a history lesson.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:52 PM
1

I have no opinion on the controversy either way. I don’t care what gender my character is. I’m more focused on gameplay and function.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:50 PM
1

First and foremost, to have a central hub to discuss Men’s Rights, that you just said isn’t what the majority of posts relate to. If the sub is just to discuss anti-SJW topics, then there is about 7 other subreddits for that.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:48 PM
1

So then what is the point of this sub if the majority of posts are irrelevant to the purpose of the sub?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:24 PM
2

I’m not disputing not buying what you don’t want to buy. I’m saying this nontroversy has no relevance to this sub.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:01 PM
2

“B...b...but... the SJW’s!” This sub proclaims.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:56 PM
-3

What’s that got to do with Men’s RIGHTS? This sub has become just another anti - SJW subreddit despite the fact that there’s already about 8 already dedicated to it.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:55 PM
-2

Jesus Christ, how is this Men’s Rights?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:16 PM
1

Mate! What are you talking about with propaganda!? Not everyone that poses an objection or question to your point of view or opinion is an enemy.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:19 PM
1

Could you be anymore egotistical?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:11 PM
1

Fucking hell, mate. Whatever.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:32 PM
3

Propaganda? What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:56 PM
3

"Don't be a joke" "Your argument is garbage" Just a hint of hostility, don't you think?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:47 PM
2

Alright, fair enough. Why are you acting so aggressive for some reason?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:42 PM
2

It’s possible that injuries aren’t inflicted during a rape, although to be fair, I’d assume they are a minority. They’re are stories from victims of sexual assault where they state that they just froze out of shock, so the attacker wouldn’t need to apply a level force that could leave behind injuries like bruising. This type of reaction is most common it seems where the victim is coerced into sex through blackmail or other manipulative means. Also, hair samples and semen don’t prove a lack of co…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:40 AM
5

How does rape leave a lot of evidence behind? If it’s only between two individuals, how are people supposed to find out if it was consensual, without it turning into a he said, she said argument?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 01:56 AM
1

Disney wouldn’t be where they are if they weren’t smart. They know what they’re doing and they’ll course correct I’d imagine. Although I don’t envy who has to write Episode IX. Trying to satisfy a divided fan base while addressing the passing of a central character in a respectable manner.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:36 AM
5

HAS to work? I think you’ve forgotten how much Disney owns. Marvel (the team that just made $2 billion). Pixar (the team that just broke a box office record). They’ve already made their money back they spent on Star Wars so it’s not a gamble anymore.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:12 AM
4

I can almost guarantee you it won’t.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:59 AM
2

Good video but what has it got to do with Men’s Rights?
/r/MensRights29/06/18 05:23 PM
2

This is the shit I visit Men’s Rights for. Fucking hell, mate.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:18 PM
0

What’s this got to do with Men’s Rights?
/r/MensRights31/05/18 02:58 AM
1

There certainly isn’t an easy fix to this. It’ll take years for any progress to make a dent in this issue.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 02:19 AM
1

I just think it’s a scenario you’ve gone through too many times. From an outside perspective it’s almost become routine at this point. Everyone’s reaction to hearing about a shooting isn’t “Oh my God, please no.” It’s “another one.” ... The topic has to be discussed now or else everyone just moves on and nothing changes.I don’t envy America’s position with this issue because with the limited details I’m aware of with gun stats, I don’t think there is a solution.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:45 AM
1

I’m not from America so I’ll admit that I’m quite unknowledgeable about the specifics but surely people have anti gun views considering the frequency of shootings. In terms of children asking for more control, they’ve been affected by the violence considering it’s their schools getting attached. Surely they should at least have a say. Granted they may not know every detail but certainly enough to say that this isn’t normal.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:16 AM
1

I’m able to listen to different opinions just fine. I just don’t want to listen to some tit who I feel gets into debates with people that he knows he can win against for the sake of his ego. They weren’t lecturers he was speaking to. It was the general public. He was telling them that the rifles in front of him were machine guns. They believed him, then he thought they were idiots for not correcting him.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:34 PM
1

My opinion of him is that he is a conservative that happens to be an asshole. He is not an asshole because he’s conservative. He has his viewpoint and I have mine. Fine, whatever. His video that made my mind up that I’m not interested in what he has to say was his Gun Control upload where he impersonates a liberal speaker. Says misinformation and then asks smug at the fact that the public don’t correct him. OK. Fine. You know more about gun regulations than the average person. Good for you but d…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:57 PM
1

I guarantee you Steven isn’t doing this for the benefit of mankind or some noble shit. Him, McInness and Dice all reek of. “I’ve got a conservative viewpoint, therefore I’m better than you”. Why the hell should I be happy that a knobhead is being a knob for sake of “expanding viewpoints”. This subs admiration of these conservative commentators is beyond embarrassing. Before you respond with “well why are you here?”, I’m not subscribed here, I only show up every few weeks for a chuckle.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:00 PM
1

Crowder goes into the lions den, e.g college campuses so that he can easily beat them in debates considering it’s his job to know this shit and boost his own ego. It’s hardly difficult. He puts himself across as so intelligent yet denies the ice caps melting. Classic. This guy you’re talking about. Tell me more about him, he sounds interesting.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 06:17 PM
1

Crowder has civil conversations looking only to open a conversation. Which is why he disrupted a talk by the Young Turk in makeup shouting “Ugggghhhh, Ohhhhhh” just to antagonise and annoy him. What a conversation. He interrupted a feminist convention (don’t see the need for one but whatever) wearing nothing but a pair of pants in order to annoy people. What a conversation. Crowder has had a significant role to play in this divide between people. He’s an asshole, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:50 PM
1

Fuck knows. I don’t know behaviour so I’m not going to assume that what someone does means this. Also, I haven’t seen the video because I think Crowder is a complete tosspot, so I don’t know if the guy becomes aggressive.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:43 PM
1

The observations you make could mean anything though. You can watch someone do anything and then say that it represents this for the sake of making a point that may not even be valid.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:20 PM
1

I just think it’s a bit of a stretch. I hate when people do the whole “He does that, that means this,” “Look, he glanced up to the left when explaining his story, that means he’s being dishonest.” Just cause you played LA Noire doesn’t make you a human lie detector.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:32 AM
1

Is this your armchair psychology kicking in?
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:02 AM
1

I was just so confused as to how this video was the top post despite these types of videos being full of shit.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:22 AM
-1

Whatever.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:55 AM
1

I guarantee you that the majority of people that see these experiments do nothing to benefit anyone afterwards. They either go “It’s fake” and disregard it or they go “oh, that’s a shame”. ... That’s it. That’s the level of response after the video is done. I’m not saying that the issues raised in the video are to be scoffed at. In fact, the opposite. Experiments like these can be on homeless men, male domestic abuse victims, etc. Issues like these have my firm support but posting videos like th…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:32 AM
0

It’s possible for studies to be fabricated but I’d presume it’d be significantly less frequent than these experiment videos as they’ll be from more reputable establishments.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:47 AM
-1

Scientific studies and Social Experiments are completely different. Usually studies are done by actual professionals with the intent of discovering something new, disproving or proving a hypothesis, etc. Social Experiments, on the other hand are usually done by YouTube stars with the intent to make money off of people’s sympathy. They are edited and highlighted in a way that is perfect for sharing on Facebook and Twitter. “Everyone, you all need to see this shocking video! So sad. No one stopped…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:18 AM
-8

Since when has a “Social Experiment” video been real. They were shown to be bullshit years ago.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:02 AM
2

I feel the same way about him. Obviously he comes up with decent rebuttals to arguments from SJW's (but to be honest, who can't), however it's a similar issue I've got with Gavin Mcinness. I just find them quite annoying and fairly obnoxious.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter