TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StudentOfTheTruth0 Archive

View 17 posts and 1,480 comments by StudentOfTheTruth0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
730

GeneralStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:53 PM
656

Social IssuesStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:01 AM
533

Social IssuesStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:12 AM
184

DiscriminationStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights06/09/21 11:37 PM
128

Social IssuesStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights12/03/21 06:56 AM
126

Marriage/ChildrenStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:01 PM
110

Activism/SupportStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights02/12/21 09:10 PM
104

GeneralStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights03/10/21 05:09 PM
82

Social IssuesStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:44 PM
45

Social IssuesStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights16/03/21 03:25 AM
44

GeneralStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:02 AM
44

Social IssuesStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights26/07/21 07:39 AM
31

GeneralStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights02/08/21 11:28 PM
17

DiscriminationStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:49 AM
5

Social IssuesStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights16/03/21 03:11 AM
1

GeneralStudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:28 AM
1

StudentOfTheTruth0/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:34 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,480 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

While Purdue is doing better than most colleges keeping male enrollment, Daniels' message is a horrible one if you take time to read it. It essentially complains about sinking male enrollments because THEY ARE BAD FOR WOMEN (women have fewer choices to marry at their own educational levels), not because it is open discrimination against half the population. That he doesn't give sh*t about. He also blames MEN for the situation ("they don't keep up their half of the bargain", again, causing women …
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:42 AM
1

Reddit is out of control with its misandry. So are all other social and broadcast media outlets. They are hysterical in their man-hatred, full of misandrist hate-speech and openly support female rapists and murderers. Such hysterical behavior is a sure sign of the major societal breakdown and collapse human societies are undergoing right now worldwide, but especially quickly in Western countries. Apparently the social collapse must happen because these hysterical haters: wokes and feminists, jus…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:19 AM
3

That woman should be harshly punished for her crimes to set an example for future female wrong-doers.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:07 AM
1

This is such typical "modern woman" behavior: bullying, blackmailing and manipulating someone who is much better than the woman. It is a nightmare and he needs to get out of this. Try to talk to him about the situation and see if there is a way for him out. Like what are the things that he did that she is blackmailing him with? Maybe it is not that serious and could be better to deal with them than being stuck forever in this nightmare scenario of being kept a hostage by a crazy female.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:48 AM
6

It is always the same in the media. Women don't commit rape, they "have a relationship with a minor", "have sex with a minor", "have sexual activity with a minor" or "are seduced by a minor". The are all rape enablers. My stomach turns. - Leaves to vomit. -
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:29 AM
0

I the feminists won't shut down this community, too, in the end. They usually don't tolerate anything that conflicts with their misandrist "narrative".
/r/MensRights12/01/22 07:02 AM
2

No. The no-reciprocal cases are non-reciprocal because men know that they don't have the right to physically defend themselves. They get arrested in case police get involved. It is the vast majority of the cases.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 05:35 AM
1

The article didn't say he "pretended to kill them". Only that he was "toting a toy water gun". As a matter of fact, he himself said in an interview after the incident that he wasn't even aiming the gun at anybody but shot in the sky to "create entertainment to spread awareness". But I don't get why you are so sensitive. Feminists proudly and openly scream "kill all men", "all men are trash" and similar things. Loud applause follows, "oh what strong independent women, aren't they wonderful?", Whe…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 06:14 AM
1

Yes, you should be pissed. If the law forbids discrimination on the base of gender in hiring, college admissions etc. it should forbid gender discrimination in renting. This practice should be simply outlawed as illegal, that simple. You either "equal opportunity rent" or you don't rent. Your choice. That's what the law should be.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:57 AM
2

Says it all. Feminism had been from the beginning a violent, misandrist, fascist movement and has remained so to this day, and will be forever. In case anybody doubted it for a second.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:53 AM
2

Will never happen. They are feminists and ask only the other feminists.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:49 AM
2

It is worse than that. When children are killed by one parent alone, it is 71% mothers and 29% fathers. https://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:48 AM
1

When I think that the US is the worst hellhole for men to live in, all I need to think is "India" to instantly correct myself: the US is only SECOND worst hellhole for men to live in.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:38 AM
5

Absolutely disgusting. Two points. (1) "The simple mathematics of more women than men earning college degrees means that many highly educated women will either have to partner with less-educated men, or forgo partnership,” resulting in a lower birthrate." THAT'S his problem. Not how unfair and illegal is the massive discrimination against men and boys in education and academia. No, that never crossed his mind. The ONLY problem with too few men in college is that WOMEN will have some issue as a r…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:36 AM
1

About 10 to 20. Women aim at the top 10 to 20 percent of men.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:10 AM
2

Even after considering women who spread their bags and purses on the seats.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:09 AM
1

Classic list by a legend, Mark J. Perry.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:08 AM
1

Age old story of female privilege. What else do you expect? Females have become such a dominant ruling class that they even have the power to physically abuse men without any consequences. Like in the old days of slavery when a slave owner could hit, punish and torture slaves with impunity. Same thing. Ruling class vs. slave class. No more needs to be said.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:05 AM
2

Men need far more than a fathers' rights movement. They suffer from much more than just parenthood taken away from them. But at least this is something, more than nothing.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:01 AM
3

MRAs do talk about them but the Men's Rights Movement is prosecuted and demonized by the media and outposts like the Southern Poverty Law Center, so it has no societal influence.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:49 AM
2

"when men start waking up and no longer take any of these accusations seriously anymore." It doesn't matter what men take seriously or not. What matters is what law enforcement (i.e. the government) takes seriously or not. And the government is fully taken over by the feminists in all Western countries. That's where we are, and that's all that matters.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:47 AM
2

As for Kennan Basic: never do a woman you don't know a favor.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:45 AM
9

Since men are the dominant group in patriarchy theory You start you theory with a lie, it will support any lie you want as a conclusion.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:37 AM
23

My theory: science shows that women are more aggressive than men. In particular, 71% of physical domestic violence is initiated by women. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ Lesbian couples have the most domestic violence, followed by straight couples, followed by gay male couples who have the least domestic violence. "The lifetime prevalence of rape, physical violence and/or stalking by an intimate partner is extremely high in the lesbian, gay and bisexual community with lesbi…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:34 AM
4

The criminal is a woman? Oh, well, then a slap on the wrist, like "probation", done. Never jail, though.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:17 AM
4

Yes, reality, the truth and science can be on-sided. Namely on the side of the truth. As in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ "In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases." And they were non-reciprocal because the men knew that in this legal system they don't have the right for self-defense. Should they try to defend themselves physically, they will be the ones arrested, regardless of evidence, they will lose their homes…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:01 AM
1

This is so trivial. Why do we need "research" to find this out? It is like we need "research" to find out that men are human beings. Yes, with emotions. No, they are not less "human" than women. The key aspect, of course, is the "Contrary to widely held gender stereotypes" part. Yes, everything feminists claim are simply untrue, false, manufactured stereotypes, i.e. sexist prejudices. Feminism is a truly sexist hate-speech movement. Everybody should know that. Now, of course, these fabricated st…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:56 AM
1

Put a swastika on feminism already.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:48 AM
5

FYI: feminism, and by a statistical majority, women, are always on the side of collectivism and government hand-outs. As a result they are, even when they deny it, instinctively on the side of communism. The reason for this is that feminists know that they always get more from collectivist and hand-out programs than what they put in, as opposed to men, so it is in their interest. See previous discussions about the fact that only men pay net taxes during a lifetime while women only get net benefi…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:37 AM
6

It is actually much worse. Since police automatically arrest men in case of a domestic dispute without even looking at any evidence, and once getting a police record men have zero chance of keeping the home and the children, they massively underreport their domestic violence suffering at the hands of women. Moreover, women initiate 71% of physical domestic violence, knowing full well that a man is extremely limited in his attempts to defend himself physically. Even with that being the case, in a…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:17 AM
2

The only appropriate answer is to switch the words "men" and "feminists" in the whole rant and call out that every sentence stands exactly as true or false as before the switch. Like with "feminism is a diverse movement" call out that it is equally (actually more) true that "men are a diverse group" and so on. So this whole rant is extremely biased and prejudiced because it says all good things about feminists and all bad things about men, without any reason or justification when in reality the …
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:08 AM
5

They have to join forces and do it as a group. Not one by one.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 02:02 AM
1

The point is, for the 100th time, that your hysteria about breastfeeding doesn't change any of the fact that fathers can be as good parents as mothers. It is all up to what kind of persons they are not whether they lactate or not.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 01:59 AM
4

Rapes are very rare. About 1.7%. False accusations are very common.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 01:58 AM
0

Just forget it. MGTOW. My 2 cents.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:29 PM
2

What this case shows is how dangerous the myth of "mothers are better parents" can be in deciding custody cases. As in this case, there was a mentally sick mother and a perfectly good and sane father, yet the mother got the custody with the result of a dead child and a grieving father. That's all.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:27 PM
2

I clearly stated that. What this case shows is how dangerous the myth of "mothers are better parents" can be in deciding custody cases. As in this case, there was a mentally sick mother and a perfectly good and sane father, yet the mother got the custody with the result of a dead child and a grieving father. That's all.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:26 PM
1

No, they can't. If you can't breastfeed, you aren't the same quality. Take it up with God if that's an issue. Why are you so much on edge? I just replied to your statement about why supposedly men just cannot be as good parents as women, as if breast-feeding was such a gigantic issue when it is not. It is a trivial side issue. That's all, you don't need to go ballistic about every little thing. Also, yes, I can "wrap my brain around" your vacuous, unproven, rhetorical claims like "the fact that …
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:23 PM
4

will eventually trickle down to men as well as new precedents are set I doubt it. What I see as a trend is more and more excuses for women to get away without punishment after committing crimes but I don't see any similar trends for men. In fact, the opposite: more and more ridiculously banal things getting branded as "harassment" or "rape" and men are persecuted and punished more and more for essentially nothing. The two go in opposite directions.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:11 PM
6

Just part of the general movement to give women immunity from murder. They have de facto immunity from rape charges, too. There is also a movement to "keep women out of jail", no matter for what. What has "justice" to do with any of this any more?
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:06 PM
2

Just my 2 cents. You are being used and abused. If I were you I would get out. Situations like this are all the arguments needed for MGTOW. Just my humble.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:02 PM
5

See my comment above. Statistically, only 2% are proven to be false but that doesn't mean 98% are true. The reality is that in the 96% of unknown cases the man is simply punished without evidence. That's the horrible injustice and unconstitutional denial of due process and denial of innocent until proven guilty brought to men. "Believe all women" is a complete travesty of any justice. It amounts to "let's determine the truth of a statement not by the facts but by the gender of the person making …
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:58 PM
0

No, they are not rare. The media-pushed PERCEPTION that they are rare is based on a manufactured "feminist study" that went like this: the data says that in 2% of the cases allegations are PROVEN to be false in 2% of the cases allegations are PROVEN to be true in 96% of the cases it is unknown if the allegations are true of false (because it is simply he-said-she-said without any evidence either way) So the "feminist scholars" simply lumped to together the 2% proven to be false cases with the 96…
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:53 PM
5

That's one way of looking at it.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:24 PM
1

"what the fuck is wrong with people?" Correction: what the fuck is wrong with women (specifically the ones who follow feminists)? Answer: everything. They discovered that they can extort any amount of privileges, power and money for themselves just by screaming shit like "misogyny!", "incel!", "patriarchy!" and crap like that. Now, as long as it pays, and there are no repercussions for them, they will keep doing it. So we need to stop it from paying, and make them have repercussions. Only then w…
/r/MensRights15/12/21 06:57 PM
22

With every reason. I only cannot condemn American parents of sons enough, especially fathers, for being so blind to the plight of their sons and so permitting their abuse by every and all organizations, from K-12 schools to colleges, to employers, law courts and the government. It is horrendous what is going on in the US, in other Western countries and in the world at large. I agree with comments that "being "worried" is BS. Do something. I am so glad I never wanted any children, especially boys…
/r/MensRights15/12/21 06:24 PM
2

Babies can be fed from bottles. Many women refuse to breastfeed and just use bottles.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 06:12 PM
4

"Mothers are more important for small children and babies. Fathers stand out when a child is coming of age and throughout the teens. Yin and yang baby." Nice theory, sounds good, heard it a million times, don't believe one word of it. IMHO, the quality of parenting simply depends on the quality of the parent as a person. Good persons are good parents, bad persons are bad parents, regardless of gender. Often times when the mother dies e.g. in childbirth (was much more common historically than now…
/r/MensRights15/12/21 02:08 AM
7

No, just factual, actually. "The [US] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey reports on the lifetime prevalence of rape, physical violence or stalking by an intimate partner, focusing for the first time on victimization by sexual orientation. It finds a victimization prevalence of 43.8 percent for lesbians, making it the second most affected group after bisexual women (61.1 percent), ahead of bisexual men (37.3 percent), heterosexua…
/r/MensRights15/12/21 02:02 AM
2

Time for the lawsuit.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:16 PM
3

Reddit has an official discrimination policy based on gender, race and religion. How can "except for Judaism or Islam" even be stated? Why are Buddhists worth any less than Jews or Muslims? How is Reddit even legal? It is time to for the lawsuits against Reddit to roll in.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:14 PM
5

The world is not going crazy it is gone crazy. Completely. It is so horrible to live in it mainly because of the monsters like the woman in this case.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:11 PM
28

The misandrist trolling is strong in the comment section.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:06 PM
1

Thank you for the idea, it is really interesting and important. I will definitely consider ICMI. A lot of people I admire a lot are keynote speakers there.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 12:29 AM
1

I fully agree with you that giving money should never be a prerequisite for free speech. Free speech should not have any "prerequisites". I definitely do not intend to obtain any donation, I intend to give myself.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 12:28 AM
1

I sincerely thank you for all that you do.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 12:25 AM
1

Because I knew immediately that you were wrong. I know a lot about gender issues and I couldn't believe that somebody could seriously believe that that are countries with 60-90% male population. The gender difference in any country is less than 2% and in the vast majority of countries there are more women than men because women live longer.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:02 PM
3

Thank you very much for bringing these excellent groups to my attention. I feel very strongly about the barbarity of circumcision and about the criminal indifference of this society towards it, as opposed to all the hoopla about female genital mutilation that barely even exists in developed societies. Unlike MGM. Thank you again for this connection.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:55 AM
0

You are very wrong again. The first time I didn't even care to provide any evidence because your claim was so absurd (like there is any country on earth where 60-90% - holy crap 90%???? - of all people are male ???) - that it seemed just absolutely obvious how wrong that claim was. FYI in all developed countries there are more women than men, primarily because women live longer. In retirement facilities the ratio is often something like 2 to 1 female-to-male ratio. I thought that these facts wer…
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:44 AM
13

I am afraid you are misinterpreting, or at least minimizing, this statement, even if with the best of intentions. To me (and this is only my personal opinion) the statement includes the fact that "in the courts of laws, in the court of public opinion, in the media, in entertainment and advertising, in academia, in legislation and in government men can never win any argument in this completely lopsidedly gynocentric, feminist-controlled and misandrist society, mostly due to men being the only sig…
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:33 AM
2

You are not overreacting. You react to it as every moral, ethical and reasonable person should. With disgust.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:26 AM
5

It is true, but women, especially feminist-controlled women, don't need Disney. They get their entitled man-hatred and misandry from feminism, Disney just adds gloss to it. If you can it call "gloss" given how disgusting Disney is. It is more like "gross".
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:10 AM
1

Feminists want to shut done everything that would help or support men, no matter how great or urgent the need, because they generally want to ban any talk about men's suffering as it invalidates their false narratives of women being "victims" and being "oppressed" when in reality it is pretty much the opposite.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:33 AM
5

So just briefly: - ONLY women have reproductive rights, men have zero say in abortion or not, or any other reproductive issue. Men can be falsely made fathers by zillions of legalized ways of paternity fraud. In many states and countries men don't even have the right to a paternity test to at least know if a child is actually theirs. Unlike women, men have very little by parenting rights, 80% of the time lose custody of their children as well as their money in divorce cases - unlike women, men d…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:30 AM
1

Thank you for this good advice. I am thinking along the same lines.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 03:38 AM
1

That is great but read the some comments about them, it is not all positive. Nonetheless, even a "good but not perfect" organization is better than none at all. Thank you for considering them.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 03:37 AM
9

But on that basis why did they ban r/misogynyfetish ?
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:51 PM
1

They are sadist. Perverts. And Reddit allows those perverts to aca out their perversion. I think this should be reported and get banned by law. In one cartoon they even call men "animals". That's a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that bans the degrading of human beings.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:46 PM
2

Thank you so much for providing us with this valuable resource.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:35 PM
4

"In Japan, the population sex ratio has seen only very slight changes over the past decades. In 2015, the number of men was around 95.5 for every 100 women, constituting a decrease from 96.7 in 1955." https://www.statista.com/statistics/612108/japan-sex-ratio/ "Republic of Korea male to female ratio was at level of 100.24 males per 100 females in 2020, down from 100.43 males per 100 females in 2015, this is a change of 0.19%." https://knoema.com/atlas/Republic-of-Korea/topics/Demographics/Popula…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:11 AM
6

"If i'm not wrong" You are wrong. Completely.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:45 AM
1

Maybe in his opinion men don't deserve even water any more.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:43 AM
3

That is an underestimate. At least 43% are men but that is also and underestimate because men are practically barred by the law to report abuse as police will arrest them and they get indicted no matter the circumstances. Once having a police report even though they were the victims men are bound to lose their children, their money and their freedom. I think it is pretty safe to say that the majority of domestic violence victims are men as the law is always on the side of women no matter what.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:25 AM
1

Thank you wholeheartedly.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:07 PM
2

If by "ex red pill" you mean promoting man-hatred and misandry then no, thank you.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:06 PM
2

I fully agree with you. Men make up about 95% of the homeless (75% of those who reach a shelter so at least they are counted and about 20% are the "rough sleepers" who cannot even get in a shelter), yet there are 2000+ women-only shelters in the US for the 5% who are women and 0 (zero) men-only shelters for the 95% who are men. That shows everything about inequality and inequity when it comes to men, and about how feminism has zero moral standing. Do you by any chance have some more detail about…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:04 PM
3

They sound wonderful and I am so glad to hear that they exist. I am definitely considering them even though I am based in the US but Men's Rights is a universal human rights issue.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:51 PM
2

What have you ever done for the human rights issue that is Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:36 AM
3

In my mind, supporting Men's Rights is a human rights issue that has nothing to do consumption. The issue is to influence legislation that has been distorted by feminists to extreme levels of injustice against men and boys. It is rights issue and rights need advocates and supporters.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:35 AM
1

Thank you for being that point of caution to my attention. The "it is not specifically for men" part made it dubious to start with. Clearly not a Men's Rights organization.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:32 AM
3

Why leave it where it probably isn't needed If this was supposed to suggest that Men's Rights is not an issue about a real need then I am done talking to you. Regarding "Top Man" and all that. Yes, I do want to avoid giving to ineffective or fraudulent organizations. But as the endless feminism groups, starting with NOW show, political organizations can be very effective at lobbying, influencing public opinion, and through that determine elections and lawmaking. That is true even when they are p…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:19 AM
1

"In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases" proves exactly the point: in half of domestic violence cases women overwhelmingly (70%) initiate (= attack first) and men don't respond with violence. In the other half of DV women still initiate at the same rate but in that half men respond. That's all the data say. You are fully wrong on all aspects of domestic violence. "Reciprocal" simply means that violence by one side is responded to by vi…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:04 AM
4

I see the point in avoiding fraudulent groups, but I am definitely not abandoning Men's Rights as the issue. I don't see any other societal issue where the need is so urgent and the population affected is so large as with the issue of Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:45 AM
1

Thank you for adding your voice.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:43 AM
1

Please do.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:41 AM
1

That's wonderful. Thank you so much for pointing me to these extremely valuable resources. You are doing a great service to a badly oppressed group in today's society. I will definitely follow your advice on this. Thank you for existing. EDIT: it is probably just me and my computer but https://uncenosrednews.us/ gives me a "This site cannot be reached error". I hope it is me.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:40 AM
1

The name comes from the statistics that 1 in 6 men are victims of sexual abuse: https://1in6.org/get-information/the-1-in-6-statistic/
/r/MensRights03/12/21 08:54 PM
2

How can the rights of any human being not a thing? What are you, a fascist?
/r/MensRights03/12/21 08:51 PM
6

I think that is a wonderful idea. Perhaps posters who suggest organizations because they are their members or have contacts to them could invite some of these groups.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 02:43 AM
6

I am aware of the statistics and the issue, thank you for pointing out the Innocence Project.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 02:22 AM
3

He said, she said. So of course he is a monster, as are all men, and she is an innocent angel, as are all women Just what else do you expect from that pile of excrement called The Guardian? (It used to be a good newspaper under the previous male editor, that's where Glenn Greenwald made revelations, until the new feminist regime took over the newspaper making it immediately the lowest form of feminist propaganda tool, and it has stayed that way ever since.)
/r/MensRights03/12/21 12:08 AM
21

"I’m all for women leading society and contributing as much as, if not more than, men." Maybe it's time to reconsider. You see before your very eyes where that leads. "I’m committed to being a strong parent in a 50/50 relationship, where my wife/girlfriend/partner and I would contribute together to build a home from a house." Well, good luck with that. But here's a warning: be careful. You might think one thing and she another. Maybe not initially but over time. Just don't get surprised. Finally…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:55 PM
21

Very thought provoking interview and an important read.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:34 PM
3

Wow, the husband has become that much-coveted "high value man" (HVM) of FDS yore. That means she, the OP, "mated" just right. Too bad, she can't keep the HVM, but the blonde sure has the HVM in her grip now. As for taking as much of his money as possible: STANDARD PROCEDURES. Again, she should read more FDS. Too bad that's not what she is after.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:31 PM
6

D, with a slight modification of the last sentence: "The West quickly declines." That decline is in full force already, it is quick and it is accelerating. Just a few signs: IMO, there isn't a single university in a Western country left worthy of that name. Instead of being in the "truth business", those places are now in the falsehood-based ideology enforcement business, in short in the "lie business". The school systems are catastrophic, again focused on ideology enforcement and indoctrination…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:22 PM
3

Which title most people, of course, will read as if it said "Gender bias against women" without reading the paper or reading any further, moving on with the feeling that "Yeap, I just read about yet another scientific study about how much women are oppressed by men". That title is misleading and deceptive INTENTIONALLY, for a reason.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:04 PM
3

Just as the exact same homework gets higher grades with a female sounding name on it than a male sounding name. Well known and well studied. I lost my strength to be even surprised any more. It is so depressing.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:00 PM
1

The usual and typical feminist hypocrisy at its worst.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 10:52 PM
15

Thank you, they are definitely very worthy of support, I fully agree with their mission.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 10:33 PM
7

Thank you. I am definitely considering them.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 10:32 PM
10

I do. Thank you, I will check them out.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 10:31 PM
8

Thank you, GIBM is new to me, I will definitely look at them.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 10:31 PM
8

Thank you. I am based in the US but I think Men's Rights is a huge universal human rights issue so I certainly consider giving internationally. I know about and support J4MB but FASO is new to me, thank you for letting me know about them.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 09:41 PM
37

Cassie Jaye is one of the heroes of this world.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 09:32 PM
26

Women kill men and boys all the time. The horrible part is that they get away with it with minimal or no consequences.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 09:03 PM
1

"in a deliberate and unprovoked way" is a definition I read online. My take: 5 months after the alleged rape she felt she needed more attention because there was money in it. Like a book. But who would buy it, or make movies of it, without publicized drama? So let's hit the street and finger a random man, sue and publicity is guaranteed. It worked. To the tune of millions. But I am open to changing the word, what do you suggest?
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:58 AM
5

Huge percentage of young street prostitutes in places like New York are boys. Nobody cares, nobody talks about it. Welcome to Feminism 101.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:42 AM
4

Female murderer gets slap on the writs, barely. Women increasingly have a license to kill men with impunity.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:41 AM
5

Men sure can't say what they want now, so no danger of female suicide rates going up.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:33 AM
0

I would be really, really worried to have a son in the first place ... what his future will hold ... just my worry.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:32 AM
1

Retroactive "revenge" = retroactive punishment of innocent people for something someone else did. What kind of legal or judicial principles do these people have? Punishing innocents for something others did? Only in the worst totalitarian dictatorships.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:57 AM
1

That is a nice sentiment you have there. I just don't see one ounce of evidence for it. Of course there are great exceptions, such as woman MRAs - but so, so, so few ... I just don't see what you say is happening. I wish I did, though.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:18 AM
3

True. Just this one comment: "The MRA, QAnon and incel rabbit holes all lead to the same warren." So MRA = QAnon now. And a "rabbit hole" while at it. And that rabbit hole called "Am I The Asshole" has 3.3 million members. 3.3 MILLION ...
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:14 AM
2

Fantastic news. Will there be any followers?
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:09 AM
1

"So i (F) am a feminist and a men's rights activist" You cannot be. The way feminism is these days, it is one or the other. Sorry.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:01 AM
15

"False accusations are extremely rare". What BS.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:57 AM
23

Let me simplify this: progressives are mass murderers at heart. At least they want to be. Here is another one: Brittney Cooper, Associate Professor at Rutgers University, (no repercussions for her, either) said this about white people: "The thing I want to say to you is, "We got to take these motherf*****s out" https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=18318 Any questions?
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:55 AM
6

71% of parents who kill their children alone are mothers. 29% are fathers. TEACH WOMEN NOT TO KILL CHILDREN! https://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:47 AM
2

FDS is mental and emotional toxin. Don't consume it, it hurts you.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:44 AM
3

What a horrendous joke. "If I am a woman, then it is not that I commit crimes, I was raped." Just what exactly did anybody expect from her "testimony"? WHATEVER I DID IT WAS MEN'S FAULT, THANK YOU, CAN I GO HOME NOW?"
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:41 AM
21

"Council of Europe" and "Human Rights". Tell me about an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:37 AM
57

The art style is a perfect reflection of the Bolshevik-era propaganda art style.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:34 AM
1

"I would wager anything that over half of the post are nothing but lies." And I would be wager that it is more like 99% or something along those lines. "It creates the false impression that this is what men think about and it and it corners judges and cops to overreact" That is EXACTLY THE PURPOSE OF IT.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:32 AM
11

That is so true.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:55 AM
26

Maybe it's time for a Netflix adaptation of this producer's investigation! ^This.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:55 AM
27

Justice. Karma. Not enough, though. All the money she made should be take away from her and given to Broadwater as compensation. And she is shameless in "not commenting" on the case. That lying b*tch Sebold.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:54 AM
11

"Revenge" for what? What long dead people did a long time ago? Acting it out on innocent young people? Great. BTW, is the "revenge" supposed to be for millennia of protecting and providing for women? Good going.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:39 AM
10

I doubt it. The Daily Mail has a history of risking the publication of problematic behavior of women, like atrocious cases of women killing or raping men and boys, getting caught and convicted for it that no other publication would dare to print. I am always wondering how much longer they can do it and when will the feminist gendarmerie come and put an end to them. I also think that this is partly a response to The Guardian (that absolutely abysmal, worst misandrist disaster) that recently glamo…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:18 AM
1

I knew all that but still, what an article. It never crosses their minds that the equivalent proposal would be: let's start a Male Dating Strategy reddit and in it, instead of low value and high value "scrotes" (= scrotums), let's categorize women from "ugly as f*ck cunts" to "high attractivity cunts" (you know, naming them by their genitals), and write handbooks about how to avoid the former. And, of course, demanding "constant investment" from the latter. I wonder what Reddit's and the world's…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:14 AM
1

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/08/statement-by-president-biden-on-international-womens-day/ I found the above googling "white house international women's day" Changed it to "white house international men's day" and guess what: no "statement of the President" came up. Trust me, if the White House made official "statements" on IMD, there would a a Google doodle. Large corporations are intertwined with governments because (a) they are the biggest donors and (b)…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 11:48 PM
1

Especially when it is not even "borderline" but "deep in the territory".
/r/MensRights30/11/21 11:33 PM
1

I totally agree with every word you wrote. I absolutely support a "reverse Lysistrata" movement - men denying sex to women to modify their behavior toward men. I found your spreadsheet idea naïve, it won't be tolerated for a second an will be taken down as "misogyny" instantly. I don't crave women's attention personally at all, but I am lucky to be married to a non-feminist, old-fashioned women who hates feminists and feminism, and admires men. Previous generation, though, pre-1960. Very few men…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 11:32 PM
1

They think they can get away with anything. Because they can.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:36 AM
1

Bettina Arndt is awesome.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:32 AM
3

I don't see any "retraction" either, at most backpedaling, with these grinding, after much negative reaction. Even that is scrubbed from he internet. A retraction would be an official and public statement by the APA, explicitly calling it wrong and unscientific. Good luck waiting for that to happen.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:22 AM
2

Feminism is on gigantic bullying act. Feminist-led women cannot force men to obey them by physical force so they do it by bullying.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:13 AM
1

That's what government sponsorship gives to you (IWM) and that's what government persecution does to you (IMD). It is not the real view of the populace, it is what the governments push on their populaces.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:11 AM
7

Stay away. STAY AWAY. This hot-cold-hot-cold behavior is typical of narcissistic psychopaths who are the absolute worst people to deal with. Absolutely never invite her over, never have anything to do with her. Your problem will be that if you keep avoiding her and her wishes, she might get mad at you and get vindictive and try to "punish" you. I don't know what to do then, other than possibly seek another job (or a move within the company) to get away from her.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:07 AM
3

And I think based on that, men should offer women an alliance. A mutual movement for both I think it is still your old naivete. It won't work, feminist-influenced women won't accept the offer. They want female supremacy only. Your last words, "I tried getting women interested in a shared and mutual discussion about the humanity and needs of both (shared alternative to feminism) with little success" proves exactly that. They are not interested in our "alliance" only in our domination. I know this…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 01:42 AM
2

It was a mix of both, I think. The capitalist class realized that OWS is about class war, which is the last thing they want to talk about. So they threw in divide and conquer in the form of turning people on each other by race and gender. All biology, no class.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 01:34 AM
2

Women hate it when men get along and do everything in their power to tear it down. Because everything must be about them, and men's role are only to serve their comfort and interests. Good times by men are a complete waste in their eyes as it is time taken from serving them.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 01:32 AM
5

This is absolutely so true and absolutely moving. No, men don't understand what is going on until it crushes them personally, and then it is too late. Just as it happened to you, brother OP. Same here. Over time I came to the conclusion that when I say "what is going on" is more specifically this: an ongoing propaganda and mind control war to prepare the grounds for and to establish a female supremacist totalitarian society. Feminists fight, for now, with the "woke" but the "woke" element is tem…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 01:25 AM
1

In my humble opinion you are 100% correct and see what is going on exactly as it is. It is not only feminism, all totalitarian regimes use propaganda to control the population. Incessant 24/7 propaganda was central to the Nazi and Communist regimes in the 20th century, are central to the rule of the Chinese Communist Party and I believe is currently preparing the ground for a woke / feminist totalitarian regime in the United States and all other Western / Anglosphere countries. That is the proce…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 12:57 AM
1

I want to hope that you are right and the majority of women don't think that way. But it is hard for me to be hopeful partly because what you just described: how effectively propaganda can shape the thinking of large populations. I am afraid the feminist / misandrist messaging is so effective that really huge numbers of women believe it. Based on what I see / hear / read online and offline. We couldn't be in the situation we are in if huge numbers of women or just generally people were speaking …
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:20 PM
2

Beats me, too, why American men consider, even remotely, to have children. I am so glad I didn't. I decided against having children because I didn't trust myself that I could provide the (in my value system, very high) quality of care I would have liked to have myself when I was a child. In the end, by now, I am happy because this self-doubt actually ended up being self-protection against this system that I didn't realize was what it was and is today. I can only feel very, very sorry for all the…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 05:13 AM
9

India is an absolute feminist shithole for men to live in, I can only feel sorry for Indian men. It made me especially livid to say "A surprising case has come to light in Jaipur, the capital of Rajasthan." Imagine if a man had cut off the private parts of an unconscious woman. Would this crap newspaper, or any media anywhere in the world, describe it as "SURPRISING". As opposed to brutal, criminal, barbaric? Just a note to this editorial board: you may be surprised by it by I am not. I have hea…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 05:08 AM
-1

if men can't or don't want to talk about it I hope you are enjoying your victim-blaming. I.e. whatever causes suffering in men, it is their fault. See, right in this subreddit https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/r4blsf/more_suicide_exist_in_men_not_because_they_dont/
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:58 AM
2

The "patriarchy" is a total lie, it doesn't exist and never did. What did and does exist is gynocentrism, but in the past at least men were respected for their protection of and services to women. Today they are vilified, defamed and demonized for the same, but of course all of it is still completely expected of them, but for nothing, in particular for no respect in return. That's the only thing that changed.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:40 AM
3

Absolutely true. It is all part of the much bigger issue of trivializing men's issues by simply blaming them on men themselves. This is just one aspect of it. Don't provide help, deny it, and then blame men for it. Standard procedures, just another Wednesday in a feminist's life. Women, especially feminists, are never the cause of men's suffering, oh no, they are divine angelic creatures always, no matter what evil things they do to men.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:37 AM
7

I wonder if you yourself, after 16 years spent behind bars innocently, because of a lying female, would exactly use the phrase about your situation as "good thing". Besides, my bet is that knowing how feminist the court system is that he won't get one red cent, or will get only a pittance. Certainly a small fraction of what she will keep.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:32 AM
1

No, I never missed that feminists abuse language. That's why I posted. I just claim that "incel" as a word, together with all their other fabrications like "patriarchy", 'man-splaining", "man-spreading" and all that crap are made up attack words to shame and persecute men innocent men who did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:28 AM
4

Where is any evidence that any rape even happened? The whole fabrication came out because the screenwriter who was supposed to make a movie about it fund the INCONSISTENCES. Well, there is a better name for "inconsistencies": LIES. Yes, if the story is "inconsistent" then there is only one sure thing that is happening: SHE IS LYING. Given that, it is highly dubious that any rape, or anything, happened at all. Where is any evidence beyond she claiming it? But even if a rape happened, she fingered…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:25 AM
6

In my observation women use false allegations for any advantage in every area these days. Whether it is to make money out of it like Alice Sebold, or out of revenge like Anisah Ahmed, or to remove a competitor, and now even to get elected. They just got the idea that they can promote themselves and their careers by destroying completely innocent men who will never be able to defend themselves ("Believe all women", remember), and they have absolutely no downside, no risk, only upside by doing the…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:52 AM
126

Women discovered that they can make serious money by destroying completely innocent men, of which this is a perfect example, so of course they do it and will continue doing it. There is no downside in it for them, only upside. Like this Sebold woman who clearly concocted the whole thing, and built a career out of a lie will never have to pay back the millions she made by ruining this man with her lies. If there were any justice (as there isn't in a gynocentric / misandrist society), every last p…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:44 AM
3

They always get them out. There is feminist pressure to change laws so that women can never be put in jail, no matter what a horrendous crime they committed. If they do it (even if it is murder or rape), it is always "justified". You know, no matter what, they are the "victim". There are absolutely shockingly shameless movements afoot, like Elizabeth Sheehy's in Canada, to grant women the right to kill men with impunity. https://avoiceformen.com/featured/elizabeth-sheehy-cant-even-justify-hersel…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:40 AM
6

They always get them out. It will be only a matter of time, maybe a few months, of more "appeals" to reduce her sentence to less than 10 years, than to nothing, like "time spent" and "probation". Then out she goes, free. She will then be portrayed in the media as the "victim". There are absolutely shockingly shameless movements afoot, like Elizabeth Sheehy's in Canada, to grant women the right to kill men with impunity. https://avoiceformen.com/featured/elizabeth-sheehy-cant-even-justify-herself…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:36 AM
15

In short, the goal of "feminism" is female tyranny. The goal is a society where women have "female supremacy" and men are their slaves just because they are born male. That's what all this is about, long story short, as you clearly noticed it. That's all there is to it.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:26 AM
5

You are absolutely right about all you say. What you describe is the phenomenon of considering men "human doings" rather than "human beings" whose only value stems from their utility to women and children. They are not valuable in and by themselves as human beings and are disposable (e.g. 94% of work deaths are men because they do the dangerous jobs, 99% of war casualties are men etc.). This is a millennia-old story that is extremely disadvantageous, damaging and dangerous to men but it is also …
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:21 AM
1

Absolutely true. My advice: let us not care about them.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 05:42 AM
2

75% of the registered homeless are men in the US, and then about 20% of the homeless are "rough sleepers" who don't even make it to a shelter to get registered who are essentially all men. That makes men about 95% of the homeless. Yet, the first category in the article of "who are in danger of homelessness" is "women". There are 2000+ women-only homeless / crisis centers in the US - for that 5% who are women and exactly zero (0) for the 95% who are men. So much about "caring" about homelessness.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 05:40 AM
1

I find it a very bad sign for the future of society that there are 13.2 million members of something as socially destructive as TwoX. As opposed to the 316K here. When social destructiveness becomes a mass psychosis, social destruction and thereby social collapse follow.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 04:44 AM
5

I am just speechless at the cynicism and cruelty of the feminist educational femocrats. So openly and intentionally and unabashedly discriminate, I am really out of words.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:48 AM
0

It doesn't even occur to them that what Brad says is the TRUTH: it IS very dangerous for men to be friendly, even just a little, to female co-workers. They created this toxicity of the workplace and now they are pissed off at the result of their own making!
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:44 AM
3

OK, so the woke-feminist complex wants to destroy Facebook because they don't consider Zuckerberg (Jewish himself, by the way) pliable enough a tool in their hands. My bet is that they will succeed and will put Facebook (which has even changed its name now to "Meta") out of existence eventually. Of course they don't get the irony that the algorithms did catch so many anti-male and anti-white attacks because there were so many. Given that the algorithms were color- and gender-blind, in all likeli…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:29 AM
1

OK, so in case you missed it, I am not debating linguistics here, which is the least of my concerns. I am writing about systemic misandry and man-hatred in the media, entertainment, academia and advertising. They have their attack words for it. They don't do anything like that to women, only to men. My interest is the social phenomenon, not linguistics, and you seem to have missed it.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:16 AM
4

The shock. By what I see, there is only one form of systemic, meaning state-sponsored, form of racism in the United States and Western countries: anti-white racism by people of color. Sure there is white racism, too, against non-white people but it is NOT systemic: it is strictly limited to individuals and no government or state sponsors it. In fact, US and Western governments vehemently persecute and punish white racism, rightly. But they don't punish, but tolerate and even sponsor anti-white r…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:12 AM
3

Erin Pizzey is one of the greatest heroes of our time. Together with Bettina Arndt.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:06 AM
5

Let us know when that happens. (Writing from the US.)
/r/MensRights28/11/21 02:55 AM
5

No need to bet. Yes, of course. The entirety of Wikipedia is "institutionally captured" by wokes and feminists, with just about any power center of society: legislation, judiciary, White House, law enforcement, military, academia, media, entertainment, advertising. Apart from some STEM-related content I never use nor pay attention to Wikipedia, which is a woke / feminist tool of propaganda. It started out as such a great idea (the free dissemination of knowledge to everyone) until feminists turn…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 02:54 AM
1

That absolutely doesn't look like that to me. If anything, the second image just clarifies, makes it more extreme and proves that she means her man-hatred 100%, without any thinking, without any knowledge of any facts, without any brain involvement at all. Hers typify the most horrible sentiments human being can have. Read Nazi media about Jews and you see the like of it.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:53 AM
1

Is "femcel" also an "accepted" definition of sexless women? Is it also "based on statistics"? Do they even keep "statistics" for that, or is it only the honor of men to have this kind of statistics kept on them (for the purpose of attacking and shaming them in the media, of course)? And by the way, what is your definition of "accepted" statistics? That you "accept" them means nothing to me, because I know where you come from (namely, from misandry). What misandrists generally mean by this kind o…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:45 AM
2

The truth is what it is. I don't need to comment, you see it yourself. If anybody needs "allies" today, it is men. Especially women allies who have the courage to stand up to the feminism juggernaut. I hope you are such an ally. If so, thank you.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:21 AM
26

So true. "Incel" is yet another feminist-invented man-shaming curse word. They invented a whole language of misandry. It is also completely unmoored from reality. But they will never know that.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:39 PM
252

Amazing. It never crosses their minds that what they write about men is not the actual truth about men but the misandrist lies about men purveyed to them by their media. What she sees is not what men are like. What she sees is what Reddit is like. But that never occurs to her. So sad. Pathetic, too.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:36 PM
8

I don't think that these days there is anything even remotely problematic about having multiple boyfriends for females. Most of them have a bunch or "orbiters" and "friend-zoned" men etc. The only thing that is unpardonable for them is when men are not completely monogamous to them. Their infidelity, no problem. So the commenters take this completely seriously and are "upset" about the boys. They don't see any satire whatsoever. This is "dating life" nowadays.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 07:06 PM
8

Have you noticed that it is completely irrelevant what you "refuse to believe"? The facts as we know them from the OP speak for themselves. The "something that sparked it" are (a) her greed (b) her getting radicalized by the radical feminist crap she reads and watches. As far as I can see there is no "two way street" here whatsoever. That's all there is to it.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 07:01 PM
14

Agreed. I can only hope, too.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:54 PM
50

Sadly. The whole so-called "justice" system is totally tilted in women's favor. The great feminist "achievement".
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:51 PM
10

And this vicious woman who wantonly destroyed an innocent man's life still refuses to "comment" on the case. She made a career out of a lie.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:47 PM
2

And this vicious woman who wantonly destroyed an innocent man's life still refuses to "comment" on the case. She made a career out of a lie.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:46 PM
2

And this vicious woman who wantonly destroyed an innocent man's life still refuses to "comment" on the case. She made a career out of a lie.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:45 PM
1

And this vicious woman who wantonly destroyed an innocent man's life still refuses to "comment" on the case. She made a career out of a lie.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:44 PM
1

And this vicious woman who wantonly destroyed an innocent man's life still refuses to "comment" on the case. She made a career out of a lie.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:44 PM
1

And this vicious woman who wantonly destroyed an innocent man's life still refuses to "comment" on the case. She made a career out of a lie.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:43 PM
7

Far more than 16 years. He became unemployable due to staying on the sex offender registry. He lost his whole life to this Sebold woman.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:42 PM
56

She is enjoying the high of it for now but will pay a heavy price later.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:55 PM
2

The original post was about removing positive portrayals of men in the media and replacing them with women who are deified and glorified constantly, against all facts, while men are constantly and intentionally vilified and demonized in the media, against all facts. They do the "comparing men and women" stuff, in their media. Birth being hard or not has nothing to do with any of this, you are stuck on it when it is completely irrelevant to the topic here.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:40 PM
3

You are automatically dismissing insemination while never having any experience with it yourself. The sperm is as important as the egg, half the baby's DNA comes from the father, FYI. And what the heck does "personal experience" have to do with any of this, anyway? What I wrote is the simple biological truth, refute it if you can. "Lived experience" and "feelings" are crap that have nothing to do with FACUTAL TRUTH, only feminists trumpet them because they don't have the truth on their side and …
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:57 AM
25

"This is called karma for what men have done to women" Such as: - men provided for and protected women and their children all through history, from the most primitive tribal societies to the most modern - men built civilization itself so that women and children are protected and comfortable - men still perform all the most dangerous, unhealthy and dirty professions without which life cannot be sustained - men invented, engineered and manufactured essentially 100% of what makes up a modern techno…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:37 AM
3

"Just wow"? The truth hurts, doesn't it.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:08 AM
1

Just about all men in public roles, actors, politicians, media men, are hired prostitutes by the woke-feminist complex who betray their gender for personal opportunistic gains. They should all be shunned, boycotted and ignored by all men and their women allies.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 11:56 PM
9

The title given to this post is intentionally terrible and deceitful. The problem is not a single character's gender change, among so, so many, but the destructive movement to erase anything positive about men and boys from the media, entertainment and advertising and to change every appearance of men and boys to evil and criminal. Together with deifying women and girls despite them committing just as many and just as bad crimes if not worse then the male gender. Despite the fact that the impact…
/r/MensRights25/11/21 11:53 PM
1

I wonder if they would consider using cosmetics made from their sons' foreskins.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:37 AM
5

Of course they had to make this their subject on International Men's Day. In the spirit of the United Nations which tweeted that IMD is all for the women: https://imgur.com/a/lUqABwF
/r/MensRights23/11/21 12:45 AM
29

Oops. They forgot a few things: - women live on average 6 years longer than men, so they eat that much more https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23331196/ - obesity is more common among women than men so women eat that much more "The age-adjusted prevalence of severe obesity among U.S. adults was 9.2% in 2017–2018. Women had a higher prevalence of severe obesity (11.5%) than men (6.9%). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db360.htm#:~:text=The%20age%2Dadjusted%20prevalence%20of%20severe%20ob…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 12:20 AM
33

Yes, most feminist mothers hate their baby boys. See them as "potential rapists" and such from the beginning. Many also kill them: in 71% of the cases when one parent alone kills a child it is the mother: https://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php
/r/MensRights23/11/21 12:14 AM
8

Yes, MGM is pushed for the money they make from babies' foreskin used for women's cosmetics.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 12:11 AM
8

You just tried to post the TRUTH. But feminists hate the truth because they know that their ideology is a heap of lies and falsehoods and are afraid of this coming out. So they do everything in their power to suppress the truth and maintain the lies. You are suppressed for daring to say the truth. But the truth will come out one day, anyway. It always does. In the meantime you just stay true to yourself. And keep up the good work.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 12:05 AM
13

"we are so used to the idea that we live in a world that privileges men" Correction: "we are so used to the FALSEHOOD that we live in a world that privileges men"
/r/MensRights23/11/21 12:01 AM
1

Love your channel and subscribed.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:46 PM
3

At this rate, soon, just by being accidentally within eyesight of POC or feminists, white men will be attacked for "being symbols of hatred and bigotry" and such. Got that - simply being born and then accidentally seen, we will be considered "symbols of hatred and bigotry" or "racism" or "sexism" or "patriarchy" and what not. So better disappear quickly and discreetly before a POC or feminist woman sees you. It will not be a fun world to live in. The whole thing is getting more and more absurd a…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:41 PM
1

I know for a fact that Spain and India are two of the worst countries to be a man. Beats me, because Spain used to be very Catholic and thus very traditional. How the feminist managed to capture that country so totally baffles me. India being an Asian country with lots of religion and tradition, also puzzles me, how it could get they way it is now.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:22 PM
2

I don't have personal experience with it but just assume based on what I know that gay men as SOs or partners or lovers or boyfriends are a lot less vindictive and dangerous than women. I mean on average, individual cases of course vary a lot.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:18 PM
1

What a sad truth. And what a horrible society to live in. IMHO it has never been this bad since WWII and the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:16 PM
1

If you read the foundational document of feminism, the 1848 "Declaration of Sentiments" by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, you realize that feminism was always, actually, a collective of bitter first world women who felt fully entitled do hate men and make demands to them, and who hated men and were misandrists. Sorry to break the news for you.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:14 PM
2

Thank you for being one of us.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:07 PM
2

"which made me question if dating that girl was even a good idea" No, it is not. If she takes it this lightly, and considers it this natural, then she'll never stand up for you or be by your side in any future life event. I would say, pass.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:08 AM
1

Boycott.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:04 AM
1

This is what domestic terrorism looks like.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:03 AM
8

By famous ... you mean, we are targeted? Yes, we are. All the time. Part and parcel of the everyday hatred percolating through and through this gynocentric, misandrist society. BTW, thank you but we know it already. You are not the first one to notice that we are targeted.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:55 AM
2

No, I don't believe it. First, some women, just like some men do self-cutting. No suicide intended but when found out it is likely more women than men turn around and claim it was a "suicide attempt". Moreover, I believe far more women than men would fake a suicide attempt for (1) attention seeking (2) drama seeking (3) emotional blackmail (of a partner, or a family) Men are known to be a lot less likely to seek attention or drama for its own sake and emotional blackmail, like all emotional mani…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:52 AM
49

Not really. Scandinavia is the most feminist possible. But by and large, feminism has morphed into a from of international terrorism, there is barely any country left in the world where its destruction is not felt. Very scary what a future world will look like.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:45 AM
1

You are a hundred percent correct. From now on, I will make a point on every International Women's Day to ask "what about men?". When there is this shocked silence and questioning of what I mean I would say, "oh, I get this question of 'what about women?' on International Men's Day, so I think it is appropriate to ask 'what about men' on International Women's Day." Let them choke on that. BTW, they made up this "Women Entrepreneurship Day" exactly to cancel out International Men's Day and they p…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:40 AM
1

I thought the people had spoken.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:33 AM
10

Best part, the reason he rejected her proposal because it turned out she was already married and had two children. Unbeknownst to him. This is what domestic terrorism looks like.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:30 AM
2

They are, if you ask (most of) them.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:12 AM
1

I think it pretty much accurate as it is. Otherwise the "UN women" (who are supposedly not feminists) would have complained about it.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:12 AM
3

I loved the one that said "UNequality".
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:09 AM
62

Silly me.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 05:18 AM
2

Society is breaking down because of THEM, the woke and the feminists. THEY are breaking society down. Of course we don't owe one thing to any one of them.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:49 AM
2

I call that MGTOW. The only way to go.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:44 AM
1

May a not be enough. Look at the groveling of Bezos, Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc. to feminist and woke power. Despite their wealth, they can be ganged up on, cancelled, their companies and products be boycotted etc. and they know it. Besides, a lot of that wealth will go to the wife, like Bezos' former wife who got billions, or Melinda Gates who divorced Bill Gates, and who knows how many billions she took.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:44 AM
1

No, in movies nowadays the mere absence of misandry is considered misogyny. Like not enough rambling on about how bad men are or not showing men being degraded, beaten up, kicked in the groin etc. is "misogyny" to them. They feel entitled to their favorite drug, misandry. It just must be present in everything in the media , entertainment or advertising, or else it is "misogynistic". Forget about criticism of women, no matter what, even when they are rapists or murderers, absolutely out of questi…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:38 AM
6

Good to know that there exist great and brave men out there like Dr. Thomas Oester and Dr. Jerome Teelucksingh.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:21 AM
2

And never will be. Remember, it's a "school", i.e. a cesspool of misandry - as it is meant in the educational systems of today.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:10 AM
3

Very true but a spellchecker could have been helpful, though.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:09 AM
4

Virtue signaling, brown nosing suck up at its worst. What a shame that there exist men like the one that wrote this piece of crap.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:06 AM
2

This level of hatred is so sick and perverted, it is really scary. Just baffles me how this is socially completely accepted. Nobody would dare to say such things, including "Kill All Men" about any other group.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:05 AM
2

Sick and perverted.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:01 AM
2

Be careful, they might come after you for this. We men are practically under siege in this society.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:58 PM
2

Many happy returns.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:48 PM
7

Correction: men's right is nowhere because of the (feminist) women.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:48 PM
3

^This
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:47 PM
1

Absolutely. Another year, same old crap. It just feels worse every year. And every day.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:40 PM
3

For this 48 year old female (OP) it is a surprise new discovery what a horrible place men live in in this society. Well, welcome to reality. It should be a huge DUH! Just look around yourself and see how men are treated in everything. Gee, I am so surprised ... (says OP). I am not. Wait ... yeah, that might be because I am a man.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:44 AM
3

Interneational Mens' Day "will be be celebrated on November 19th worldwide". Well, let's see if "worldwide" includes, e.g. the US. Or any Western country for that matter. (Or India, for another misandrist hellhole.) I don't expect a "Google doodle", not that I give a sh*t, given what a biased misandrist woke propaganda joint Google has become (with the rest of MSM/social media). What I expect is the same deep misandry and hatred of men on November 19th as on November 18th and November 20th. Surp…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:23 AM
1

That woman with the half bleached hair that speaks is a total blabbering idiot, makes absolutely no sense. What a bizarre piece of crap that whole "news" segment was.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:17 AM
1

Schools are misandrist hellholes, just like this whole society. At least schools prepare you for what to expect in the "real life". Except it is even worse in real life.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:13 AM
2

For men, every day is hell day. Just my humble. Oh, and don't expect a "Google doodle" on November 19th.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:08 AM
2

Not "humor" if you ask me. They clearly state the equivalence of "man park, just like dog park". So man = dog. Man = animal. Imagine this with the genders reversed. The only thing is, it does touch on a real issue of male loneliness. But instead of taking it seriously and trying to look for ways to help, they reduce it to a joke and equate men with animals. If that's funny to you, enjoy. But not me.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:07 AM
2

I am not even surprised anymore.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:59 AM
2

I don't think it is only in the Philippines. The data I know indicate that more men are raped a year in the US than women (if you count "made to penetrate" as rape as you should and add prison rapes, more than a quarter million a year). I also have seen CDC data that completed rape is more often committed against boys than girls in the US. I think it has always been like that (think pedophile priests) , the issue just always has been silenced. Nowadays it is getting worse as women can molest boy…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:51 AM
1

Asking everybody here: would it help OP if he was the first to talk to the HR dept or wherever this would become a problem? Kind of pre-emptively talk to them, about his suspicion of getting framed? I have no idea how these things work, so I thought I would ask. What to you think?
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:46 AM
1

The parallel is perfect.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:40 AM
1

This crap (feminism) just spreads and spreads. It is a toxin and there is increasingly nothing that is safe from it. Formula 1 racing included, apparently. What will stop this?
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:39 AM
1

They, feminists, did only horrible things to men. They are sick perverts.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:36 AM
8

Because more and more people are misandrists. Haters. Their hate is their fuel, that's what they live on because they have nothing else to live on, other than hatred. So pathetic.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:35 AM
5

She criticizes misandry but says it is important to "call out" "toxic masculinity". Yeah, right. Last thing men need is "defenders" like this. What a joke.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:28 AM
2

They forget that their whole hysteria about "feeling unsafe" is caused by feminist misandrist propaganda and the media that spreads it. Now they are mentally affected by it and they blame US. They should keep in mind that 80% of violent crime is directed at MEN NOT WOMEN, so women are four times safer walking down a street than men. Moreover, violent crime has been dropping for decades now and is at an all-time low. Except in black neighborhoods where "defund the police" caused a spike in murder…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 07:38 PM
2

In the real world, the entire government, the justice system and law enforcement is all theirs to complain to. There is a reason why 80% of suicides are men or 95% of the homeless are men with 0 shelters for them, 94% of workplace deaths are ment, 60% of college students are female and on and on and on, this whole subreddit is about how the "real world" is as misandrist and totally biased against men as the school system. Family courts, affirmative action, quota systems, everything. Are you kidd…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 08:31 AM
4

Misandry is an addictive drug for most females. Like catnip for cats. Most of them are hooked on it like crazy. Hatred is their fuel, that's what they run on. A very sad world to live in.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 07:50 AM
2

Schools are turning female students into terrorists.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 07:42 AM
1

These days feminists are getting so extreme they hate their own male relatives. So this talking point won't go very far with this one.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 07:39 AM
1

What a joke that country is. Imagine this with the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:06 AM
1

Sickening.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:59 AM
1

I applaud you for this. That is true principled behavior, so rare these days. More power to you.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:40 AM
1

I am truly shocked just by reading this. I also feel so, so, so sorry for you who ever deserved any of this. We now live in an insane, out of control feminist tyranny of females that is life-threatening to men. What a hell this society is to live in.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:24 AM
1

FYI, I am married to a woman for 21 years. She is just so different, a woman who is anti-feminist and has "old fashioned" i.e normal values. Loves to take care of me, and I take care of her, we are real soulmates. Very hard to find these days. I am absolutely for gay people and gay rights. I don't hate all women, only feminists and women who follow them, i.e. misandrists. Big difference, there are even woman MRAs, like Erin Pizzey, Janice Fiamengo, Karen Straughan, Bettina Arndt and many others …
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:33 PM
0

It might seem funny to you because you internalized the misandry of the media that demeaning men is somehow "funny". You just got too used to it. Reverse the roles? Trust me - you will get cancelled with such fury that you won't know what hit you. They are soooo supersensitive about the slightest "joke", there won't be any "role reversal". I don't find this funny because it normalizes that men could and should be financially abused and does so without any shame. So it is just shameless, not "fun…
/r/MensRights03/11/21 12:05 AM
2

I tell you you are a homophobe with telling you you are a homophobe.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 11:56 PM
1

You are showing me the light, brother.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 11:52 PM
1

You found this funny because you internalized the misandry that is flooding out of the media and the entertainment industry. They scream "funny, funny, FUNNY!" while showing men kicked in the groin, men writhing in pain, men labelled as ATMs, men suffering, men hit, men beaten up, men labelled as ATMs, men stepped on by women in high heels, men tortured, men blown to pieces, men labelled as ATMs - did I mention men labelled as ATMs? Enjoy your internalized misandry, good luck. But it is not for …
/r/MensRights02/11/21 11:50 PM
-3

I would love to hope that you are alone on this subreddit. TBH. Too bad, you aren't. This place is infested by zillions of radfem trolls like you. And the moderators do nothing. Sad.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 05:18 AM
1

Looks like one of the kids is a boy. The one in the hat. He shouldn't be grinning like that in this picture. In ten year's time it will be his turn.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 05:14 AM
2

And if not enough women sign up, defund the fire department for "misogyny" and let the fire take it all. Thinking about it, at least it would end feminism.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:39 AM
1

Next thing, they will abolish science. Back to the grass huts and the caves. The logical end-game of feminism.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:37 AM
1

What do you mean "some people"? Some WOMEN, you mean. Just let's be precise in making these claims.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:35 AM
3

Grave robber. Rapist, too.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:33 AM
1

"Imo this cant be toleratered." And just who the bloody heck you think you are to determine what can be "toleratered" and what cannot be "toleratered" on this forum? It is bad enough that there are "moderators" (a.k.a. censors). What if some people totally disagree with you and don't give a damn about what you want to "tolerater" or not? The only thing that is clear is how intolerant you are. Or "intoleraterant"? Apparently rant hyperventilation can induce spelling impairment. Just my humble: th…
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:33 AM
1

It has been ages that I set foot in a movie theater, as a white man, and by the look of it I will never go in one again. There is absolutely nothing there for me, why the heck do they expect me to spend one red cent on their misandrist crap? It is not that there aren't good moviemakers out there who could make actually good movies. It is that they are not allowed to. Today entertainment = ideology imposition, and anybody wanting to do something different will be cancelled and will never get a gr…
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:14 AM
11

Men shouldn't be proposing if they have a brain. At least not to a woman.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:04 AM
1

Any pervert gets away with anything, as long as she has a vagina. These days a vagina is an official permit to commit perverted acts with impunity.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:03 AM
6

You ruined men's chances to get a decent education and hit by the consequences. Now go ahead and blame men for it. What morons.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:58 AM
1

"I firmly believe in being as much of a gentleman to woman in the workplace as possible" "Now" is always a good time to change old, false beliefs.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 05:15 AM
10

Men are the target of 80% of physical violence. Especially from strangers, on the streets. So if you want to worry about anybody's safety on the streets, worry about the safety of men.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 05:05 AM
4

^This.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 05:02 AM
11

Women and girls most affected, even when clearly not, get used to it. No matter the subject matter. And don't believe your lying eyes, facts, evidence and such, just believe the narrative. Got it?
/r/MensRights31/10/21 04:59 AM
7

They can hate me, but they don't get my support, or time, or money or energy and sure as hell they get no love. Exactly my attitude. They, those haters, can hate me for being a white man as much as they want, that's their prerogative. The only thing is, I don't give a damn, I hate them back with equal intensity, they will never get any support, help or cooperation from me on anything, and I will do everything in my power to tear the down. Nice society they made. That was their choice. Now I play…
/r/MensRights27/10/21 07:27 AM
0

Do you have any evidence whatsoever for your flimsy claims? Yeah, right, men are 94% of workplace deaths, live 6 years shorter, are neglected medically and mental health -wise, and all this is THEIR FAULT, you know, because they drink and smoke too much. Bullshit. BTW, if they drink more and are more addicted to drugs, that has a REASON, too. Because their lives are so unbearable in this shitty feminist-run society. Good to know that you are yet another voice of feminist propaganda on the MENS'S…
/r/MensRights26/10/21 07:23 PM
3

I know what it means and I wasn't sarcastic. The point is that in any topic that comes up, feminists and women who follow them always come to the "conclusion" that everything is men's fault, including the consequences of their own bad decisions, and that "woman good, man bad", men are just dangerous brutes and rapists and what not. So all that, after listening to it for a while, adds up to the general drift that men are just a threat to everything and the uncountable good things men have done an…
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:42 PM
5

Look up Valerie Solanas and Sally Miller Gearhart for their ideas of mass extermination of men. See also "Kill All Men". They try to claim, "oh, it's just a joke" but come on. You don't joke about the extermination of 4 billion people. Far more of them are dead serious about it than you would think.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:36 PM
2

I absolutely don't see any reason for it whatsoever when I speak the truth.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:28 PM
1

Then women were finally allowed to go to other schools But their colleges were not forced to open up to men. They kept them single sex for themselves, unlike men's colleges. No equality. You just repeating yourself like a maniac. The same stupid stuff again and again. Without listening. Typical of braindead feminists.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:27 PM
5

Not a joke at all. Just the truth. Yes, woman-only colleges were established and that should have been the end of the matter. Equality achieved. But no, that was not enough. The men-only colleges had to be forced to open to women, too, while the woman-only colleges were conveniently left woman-only. Nobody forced them to give any equality to the other gender. Aren't you sensing the discrimination against men right there? Their places were forced to open to women but no women's places were force …
/r/MensRights19/10/21 08:12 AM
3

Yes, cannot be achieved in a society like the ones that exist today.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:59 AM
-3

One thing you certainly don't need to work on, whether you are a billionaire or not, is being a moron. That's completely achieved as your comment perfectly shows. It has nothing to do with the subject, is entirely puerile and has no meaning. Sorry, just my opinion about your comment.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:58 AM
1

If I were a multi-billionaire, I'd consider establishing a private, male only university Even then you would have endless difficulties. The feminist crazies would be out in arms to shut it down, using the government's power (as always) to impose their agenda on society. Money is not the only issue here.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:56 AM
8

The best idea ever, I have been long thinking about it. No wonder that one of the most wonderful woman MRAs, Professor Janice Fiamengo, wrote about it. Just a note: originally all universities were male-only because they emerged from monasteries in the Middle Ages in Europe. Their original purpose was to train Christian (in particular Roman Catholic) clergy, and as such, they were naturally male-only (because the clergy was and still is). What my concern has always been, of course, that the femi…
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:52 AM
3

No, merging them is not a good idea. They are very different programs. The boy scouts are focused on camping, tents, setting a fire, being in nature. The girls scouts are much more about business and home economics. They are also two separate private companies. What is outrageous here is that while boys scouts allow girls in (in my opinion not because they want to but because they were forced to), the girls scouts don't allow boys in. Nobody forces them, of course. Total discrimination based on …
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:38 AM
19

The biggest con job ever. The reality is that about 2% of allegations are proven to be true and about 2% of allegations are proven to be false. 96% of allegations are unknown: it is a he said, she said situation and it is nearly impossible to get reliable proof is such private matters. It is only that a "feminist scholar" did this brilliant math: let's combine the unknown cases (96%) with the proven true cases and claim that 98% of the cases are true. Voila! 2% are false! Of course without any e…
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:29 AM
23

And she got away with it. As usual. What else is new? Imagine if a man did this to a woman. As for the "prosecutors have no power" to pursue it: it is total bullshit. The CPS (the British Crown Prosecution Service) had a director at the time by the name Allison Saunders, a bigoted radical feminist. Not only did she forbid the CPS to prosecute women like this, she ordered the CPS to frame completely innocent men for rape / sexual harassment. Her goal in taking the office was to triple the number …
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:14 AM
2

Oh, yes, so let's see: due to systemic discrimination in education (boys are falling WAY behind girls, unsurprisingly, given the educational policies), which makes fewer of them reach college than women, in sharp contrast to the past (which shows that it is not the lack of male intelligence that's behind it) , so then the conclusion is ... change the system so that men and women have equal chances of getting into college? What? Are you crazy? Hell, no. The "conclusion" is, of course, that not on…
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:57 AM
1

Why all the tiptoeing about all that silly detail, "lone", and "broke" and whatnot. Let's just go for the essence: MEN are a threat to society. All of them, just by being born men. You know, a 1-day old male baby is a potential rapist. Should apologize for all the rapes in history to 1-day old girls, like they do it in some (Australian) schools, for 11 year old boys. And all that. Oh, yeah, before I forget: women are all a blessing to society. Angels, too. You know, "man bad, woman good". Let's …
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:44 AM
10

Count me in. Like Jews were inherently evil - for the Nazis. I have long been saying that feminism = today's fascism. What's so hard to get?
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:37 AM
7

"Yet in one version we assume" ... and you just said the key word: ASSUME. I don't believe it for a second, give me evidence for the opposite. Not all media "assumptions" are true, you know. Like "man bad, woman good", or "man perpetrator, woman victim" and endless other ASSUMPTIONS. As for the reality of it, it depends on the genre, methinks. I would be surprised, for one thing, if bodice-ripper romance novels sold better with a male writer's name on them.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:34 AM
8

"My perspective is that I understand it, because boy scouts is a very different program than GS. If youre wanting to hike, go tent-camping, learn knot-tying, build fires, and find a strong sense of discipline, then the Boy Scouts will be a better fit for you." And how exactly does this justify the exclusion of boys from the GS? Because boys are not allowed in the Girl Scouts (at least in the US). Do you "understand" that, too? https://www.quora.com/My-son-is-12-years-old-and-wants-to-join-Girl-S…
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:29 AM
1

"How do we feel a young guy would be treated by other young guys if he expressed an interest in going to the girls' school?" Never going to happen. "We" would feel that they want to go there only to be rapists and sexual predators. Medical school, my behind. Absolutely gender discrimination, though, (against the boys), but that's what the name of the game is these days. Misandry-"justified" gender discrimination against the male gender. At least it is not mass extermination like in Valerie Solan…
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:22 AM
11

Unreal. Imagine the other way. She sure would be a victim (you know so scared and confused and what not, the FEELINGS ...), certainly not charged for "failing to remind him". And this in Taiwan, my favorite East-Asian country (and I like all of East Asia a lot, except for the Chinese Communist Party). Where is this world heading if even Taiwan is succumbing to the global madness ... So sad.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:17 AM
14

The nerve. The hypocrisy. And why I liked this article, actually, quite a bit. "Involuntary celibate women seem to be handling their anger and hurt in a more evolved way, throwing themselves into work, life and healthy communities where single life is celebrated." The textbook definition of what MGTOW is. If women do it, they are "evolved". If men do it, they are sexistracistmisognystfascistnazis and get banned. Including, of course, on Reddit. "Appearance-based discrimination, termed “lookism” …
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:10 AM
1

That "letter" or whatever it is, is the textbook definition of "hatred-induced insanity". People like the writer are the real threat to society not radiator installers. Just my view.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 05:37 AM
1

I don't think you even read my post beyond the first sentence. I tried to explain how war has nothing to do with "violent" nature or nurture or training. It was simply unavoidable in the past. No man ever went to war because they liked it. When they went, they went because they had to (historically draft was the norm), generally to protect or try to provide more for, their women and children. Both sides always saw themselves as the attacked victim and the other side as the aggressor. There is no…
/r/MensRights18/10/21 11:38 PM
1

Reddit is evil. Somebody should send in an anti-evil operations team.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:39 AM
2

Exactly. Isn't it unbelievable. Such shamelessness.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 04:17 AM
1

The problem is when it is evil, too. Like feminism.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 04:11 AM
2

I get that, but not enough people know about the monstrosity of Gearhart who is widely celebrated by feminists and women who follow them, like some great visionary. So I just wanted to point it out, one more time, so that people can read and know about it. Speaking of great visionaries, Adolf Hitler was a visionary, too, for some people. The ones for whom Gearhart, or Valerie Solanas and their ilk are visionaries are no different than the Hitler fans were. Same fascism, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 04:10 AM
1

In that case I interpreted your post totally to the opposite. Like feminists condescending and mocking - again, for the millionth time - that Men's Rights Activists shouldn't paint themselves as rebels because "men are the establishment". I probably just totally misunderstood the intention of your post. Could have been phrased clearer to explicitly say who you were talking about, feminists or MRAs.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 04:06 AM
1

And the most monstrous, except those who are on the side of men's rights and against the feminists. Those are the truly great women, but there are too few of them. The rest: feminists (male or female) and the women who follow them have become true monsters, IMHO, and they are not even capable of realizing it.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 04:00 AM
2

OK, so let's defund the military. Just FYI, since some cities started defunding the police, homicides skyrocketed. ICYMI, the role of the military is mostly to protect your life. In general, men had sacrificed their lives by the millions to protect the lives of women and children by the millions. War had historically simply been the result of competition for resources. The moment one group had a better location, with more resources, neighboring groups attacked sooner or later, simply because the…
/r/MensRights14/10/21 03:56 AM
1

OK, so my goal is not a terminology discussion of what constitutes "famous" to you, vs. me. My point is that (a) this is clearly a (radical and extremist) feminist position (b) it is everywhere, as per the many links that have the exact same phrasing (book titles, blogs etc.) They didn't come up with it independently and on their own. (c) I also didn't come up with it, as you claim, and I didn't invent it. I read it but can't find the source, except its many iterations, repetitions and uses in t…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 02:41 AM
4

OK, so I am not talking about fiction and such. I am talking about real, and much praised, feminist positions. Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart "Gearhart outlines a three-step proposal for female-led social change from her essay, "The Future–-If There Is One–-is Female": I) Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. II) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. III) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 02:25 AM
1

Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was talking about the writer of the line "Kill All Men". Not about the author of this dumb, defending the indefensible article.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 02:23 AM
3

HUUUUGE supporters of rape jokes Any evidence? Any link? About just how huge supporters men are of rape jokes? Or are you just spouting feminist propaganda, without thinking and without any evidence?
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:39 PM
5

No sane* or rational* women seriously believe in killallmen. The why TF do they say it? Or all women normalized cruelty and barbarity toward men that they don't even get what their words mean and imply? What kind of people are they?
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:34 PM
6

What I DO know is that when somebody is shown up as insensitive and brutal, and they don't like the light it puts them in, they quickly revert to "Hey, that was a joke! As in ha ha ha. You know, like wanting to kill you all! What's the big deal?" You have become so cruel and insensitive that you don't even get, and never will, what your own words mean and imply. It's nothing to you because it is about men who don't deserve any consideration, empathy or pity. That's probably because you "as a fem…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:28 PM
7

People like "babygirl19", straight in this thread, openly defend, justify and trivialize it. They sure don't care about men. They don't care about anybody but themselves and their false self-justifications.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:55 PM
8

What exactly is the hypocrisy here? When was the last time a man, any man, ever said such things as "kill all women" in history? As a hashtag on Twitter it is just a feminist hogwash to try to minimize and trivialize their inhumanity. It is just a PR damage control exercise. And if there is such a thing as "revenge killing", it has nothing to do with gender. Here, for a boy: https://www.baltimoresun.com/maryland/bal-mob-eye-for-and-eye-long-form-story.html Here, one man killing another as a "rev…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:51 PM
8

Threatening somebody with mass extermination is never a "joke", even if for you it is. So here we are NOT talking about a "joke". What so funny about mass extermination to you? I never heard a man making a rape joke but I don't know all men. However, rape jokes are never followed up by minimizing, trivializing and justifying articles. And there are dozens of this kind of justifying articles out there, you know. I also don't know what your goal is on this subreddit as a "feminist".
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:39 PM
4

"For one, men took this phrase and ran with it." Absolutely not "men". It was feminists and women on Twitter, on other social media, then in the broadcast media, including attempts to minimize it, like this bad faith article. "It was a joke". You don't joke about mass extermination. What if this sentence was said about any other group than men? Jews? Blacks? Gays? Women? Would you be here saying, "oh it is a joke"? A society, and you personally, who are capable of joking about mass extermination…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:34 PM
2

Written by a college junior. Any link or evidence of this? I don't think it would have picked up like wildfire like it has form such a source. More like influential feminists intentionally spreading it. But even then. Let's say it was written by the college junior. And then repeated endless, thousands and millions of time by feminists and women who follow them, from all walks of life, as a mass phenomenon. And dozens if not hundreds of articles written about it in the mainstream press, and media…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:31 PM
6

A call for mass extermination is not "humor" under ANY circumstances. Even if to you it is. But there are actually decent people out there, even if you can't grasp it. The #killollwomen is simply a cosmetic PR band-aid, put there by feminists later, for PR damage control. No men ever said such a thing. Only feminists are capable of this level of cruelty and brutality. FYI.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:16 PM
7

Some are aware of this and their real plan (see Sally Miller Gearhart) is to keep about 10% of men in some stud farms for sperm production and for sexual use. So it is "only" 90%, in their case.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:13 PM
9

Mass extermination is their "coping mechanism". Besides, WTF are they "coping" with? They are full of privileges and preferred treatments. Cope my a**.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:11 PM
1

"Vilifying" is (a) subjective and (b) much, much less serious than mass extermination. Of 4 billion people. There is no way out of it, with saying, spreading and desperately trying to justify a plan for mass extermination finally showed up who feminists and the women following them really are. Monsters. Out in the open. You might want to justify whatever you want but the facts won't change. Brutality on an unprecedented scale (4 billion people) revealed and it won't go back in the bottle. Too ba…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:10 PM
14

"Empathy gap"? It is now an "empathy chasm".
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:06 PM
9

People survive rape but not murder. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:05 PM
8

They are dishonest liars to the bone. They don't even realize what monsters they have become. They stand there with a straight face justifying this kind of sentiment that is an incitement for mass extermination. Yeah, justify that. That's all there is to it. Radical feminists turned into monsters, without ever realizing it. They gradually "normalized" hate speech against men on an unprecedented scale. Even Hitler or Stalin didn't call for the extermination of some 4 billion people. They do.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:04 PM
35

You could repeat the word "punchline" as many times as you won't and this society fill finish you off instantly. The question is how can a statement calling for mass extermination be called a "punchline" in the first place???? Punchline, my behind.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 08:59 PM
2

Feminists and most women who follow them say "Kill All Men" dead seriously. It is because they are misandrists and mass extermination is the ultimate expression of hate. But when confronted about this being an incitement for violence and for mass murder of unprecedented scale, they quickly try to murky the waters claiming that this statement is "satire", you know, funny and humorous, and a joke. Ha, ha. The dishonesty, cruelty and brutality of their views is appalling. And you are completely rig…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 08:52 PM
2

OK, I found a location, http://www.fighting4fair.com/ that has it as a title. You need to scroll down. So it definitely came from somewhere, I didn't make it up, as people here claim. By its meaning, on the other hand, it is clearly a feminist statement, even if we don't know its exact originator. Again, unfortunately I didn't save the original when I first saw it and now it is gone. https://imgur.com/a/9EHaDIA
/r/MensRights11/10/21 08:22 PM
1

I definitely found it on the internet. It is and older quote and it got scrubbed from the internet by now. I wish I had saved it. But the appearance of the quote as the exact title of books and articles show that it is in the culture and came from somewhere. That on the biased and Internet scrubbing Google you cannot find it doesn't prove that it doesn't exist. It is probably on the 2000th page, if Google ever cares to find it. The first few pages of Google are pure propaganda, their algorithms …
/r/MensRights11/10/21 08:03 PM
1

spend billions annually to teach men to be violent Could you provide links / evidence?
/r/MensRights11/10/21 07:50 PM
2

If anybody is dangerous here, it is girls are dangerous to boys in school and (most) women are dangerous to men (one false allegation on a whim destroys a boy's / man's life. There will be no impartial investigation, no fact- or evidence-finding, not due process for the boy or man). Tell me about dangerous.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 07:46 PM
2

And they could teach girls, too, about consent and respect, like they teach boys, not only self-defense and the fact that a girl can hit a boy but the boy cannot defend himself. Would make a miraculous difference, for once.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 07:44 PM
1

"when you're clearly the establishment." It is anything from "clear", to me. Not even close. If anybody is the "establishment" in modern Western society, it is the "woke-feminist complex" that dominates the media, entertainment, advertising but also legislation (that passes all the female-privileging laws, despite being majority men, but the majority of them are "male feminists"), the judiciary (family / divorce courts, longer sentences for men for the same crime, not sending women to prison for…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 07:33 PM
1

Not. See my reply below.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 07:09 PM
2

Unfortunately I don't remember where I read this first (and the Internet is constantly scrubbed of feminism-questioning content) but it is an undeniable fact that the attitude is pervasive in this society. Here are some examples from contemporary debates: Here is a book with that very thing as its title: https://www.amazon.com/Women-Have-Rights-have-Responsibilities/dp/1453738029 Here is a discussion about one aspect: women have reproductive rights (like abortion), men have only responsibilities…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 07:06 PM
3

The moment they come up tell yourself mentally something like "old lie", "falsehood" and "cancel" or "delete". Prejudices are mentally formed and stored and you can fight them mentally.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:24 AM
3

Toxic femininity at its worst.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:21 AM
1

As long as there’s clear consent (and both of you are also sober) you’re good to go. Absolutely not. Women are given the right to retroactively withdraw consent. You are not good to go. "While false accusations can happen, they’re not as prevalent as one would thing." Any evidence you can quote? But not the feminist article about the "2% of allegations are false", debunked bogus and fraud, see above. This sentence sounds just like your opinion, without anything to back it up.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:17 AM
1

MHO. Yeah, that's dumb.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:16 AM
1

Not the same. There are no political movements out to make sure that if you are a man then you are as likely as possible to get in a car accident. Like intentionally digging hidden ditches in your way. But there are political movements out there to deny any semblance of due process to men, to make sure that they are as likely as possible to be punished if a woman lies, or has regrets about consensual sex later, wants to take revenge for something etc. There are such political movements but not f…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:12 AM
1

I am long past college age but if I was going to college today, I would never, ever, would have sex with a college woman, especially from the same school, under any circumstances. Just MHO.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:06 AM
2

Yes, it is like this: About 2% of accusations are proven to be false. About 2% of accusations are proven to be true. About 96% of accusations are never proved to be either true or false, i.e. are unclear, because getting credible evidence in private matters is very hard. The feminist scholars come up with the feminist math: the 96% of unclear cases sure must be also all true! So let's lump them together with the proven true cases, and lo! and behold, 98% of accusations are true! After all, only …
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:01 AM
1

A pissed off, bored or greedy wife can destroy your life in a second. I am not sure how "related" would give a man any protection.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:52 AM
1

Or doing or saying something that pisses off a random woman (especially at work). And they call this a "patriarchy". How ridiculous. It is perfectly clear who are discriminated against, oppressed and in constant danger in this society: men.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:48 AM
1

It is the equivalent of living in a Gestapo / KGB / Stasi state with the cameras everywhere (except that it is not the government who uses the cameras but men for self-protection). Courtesy of contemporary feminism.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:45 AM
1

Be careful with that, too, though. I have read many cases when women filed accusations against male college students even when when they didn't attend the same school, or any school, and lived far away. Yet the college picked up the accusation and started the un-due process against them anyway.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:41 AM
2

This society is gynocentric, misandrist and feminist-controlled. That's why. As such, it is also an evil society. But power is power, and power controls propaganda, education and all other forms of indoctrination and brainwashing. Questions?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:37 AM
1

Correct, don't do it. Don't tell the truth. The current societal system, worldwide, hates the truth and actively punishes it. The system is against you. That of course doesn't change the fact that it is an evil system.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:34 AM
1

they will abort a baby without a second thought. You probably meant "they will abort a baby boy without a second thought". Am I correct?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:33 AM
1

This might be a surprise for you but in Western countries this is automatic. What do you think "Gender Studies" programs / departments are about in the West mean? Women's issues. Automatically. Everybody knows it. As for the real reason for female infanticide in India, but in Asia in general, is that in the absence of private corporate or government solutions to old age care, parents want boys as a form of old-age planning. Girls make less money, or none (supported by their husbands) and in Indi…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:31 AM
1

So we will live in an era in which whether somebody tells the truth or lies is determined not by .... er .... the facts of the evidence, but by the gender of the person saying it. No imagine what history's judgement will be on this era. Exactly.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:16 AM
2

No. If it is a woman's word against a man, the woman is mostly automatically believed, so the man is automatically disbelieved. In the vast majority of cases. Case closed.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:14 AM
2

Bustle, all the people who write there, and all misandrists, feminists (including male ones), and women who follow them are the most cruel and brutal people. This "article" is perfect proof. Nuff said.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:10 AM
1

Good advice. OP, pay attention.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:04 AM
1

Wise words.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:00 AM
2

You are a victim of discrimination and oppression. Millions of men, and especially straight white men are, worldwide. Never think for a second that you are alone and are the only one. I think the most important thing is to refuse to blame yourself for your life problems. They are not your fault, they are the fault of this horrible, unjust and unfair, gynocentric, feminist and anti-white racist society. If you can, get away from chasing women, they are bad news for men. Just my personal opinion: …
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:56 AM
3

OP should be careful of not getting victimized by a feminist therapist who will tell him that it is all his and his gender's and race's fault, and the best way out of it is to become a male feminist and subjugate himself to a woman. There are many such "therapists" out there, he needs to be careful.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:40 AM
2

Get out of that relationship immediately. Either she will turn violent toward you, or you will commit suicide, you are in mortal danger right now.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:32 AM
2

What's your problem with the OP? He didn't write a single word, just provided a link to an interview. Once you found the article it is up to you to decide if you are interested in it or if it is too long or not for you. Sorry, I just don't get your problem.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:31 AM
2

It is heartwarming to see that there are great women out there like Elizabeth Hobson. Boy, do we need more like her.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:29 AM
2

A very clear possibility is that many women "attempting" to commit suicide are not doing anything of the kind. Some of them are self-cutting (a mental illness that has nothing to do with suicide) and many are using a "suicide attempt" partly as attention seeking, partly as a moral blackmail tool (of a partner or family members etc.). They claim that they attempted suicide but then why don't the succeed? So a lot of the so-called female "suicide attempts" are something else, hence the low rate of…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:19 AM
3

I’ve seen many feminists give up feminism when they have a son. I, on the other hand, see more and more stories about feminist mothers hating, destroying and even killing their sons. Misandry has reached the toxic levels when even mothers are capable of hating their own children just because they happen to be born male. This is a very serious concern for me.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:46 AM
1

This is typical of feminists. In everything, their "equality" means privileges for women and female supremacy. The moment it comes to real, actual equality, perhaps helping men in some, no matter how small, way, they "suddenly don't want it". Disgusting they are.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:37 AM
8

The Reddit policy of removing posts that mention boys being raped is absolutely abhorrent and despicable. Reddit is complicit in covering up rapes. That must be criminal behavior under the law.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:35 AM
6

It is pretty sad that you are mentally incapable of overcoming your propaganda-induced imprinting. When something is hateful, just throw it out. This "part of my mind believes it" is a tragedy called learned prejudice. Imagine if someone said that, you know, I really don't want to be racist, "but part of my mind believes it when I hear that blacks are lazy. I don't like it, but what can I do, it is part of mind mind". Or the same thing about, say Jews. You know, because I grew up in an anti-semi…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:30 AM
5

Those are wonderful classmates indeed. I can only wish that with new, younger generations the whole terrible societal setup, in which is gender discrimination against men and misandry are the basis of social organization, will be challenged more and more and eventually destroyed.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:23 AM
81

A famous (feminist) quote is "Rights are for women, responsibilities are for men." That attitude pretty much sums it up.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:20 AM
6

This comment will be probably removed by the moderators, for just one word (acronym, actually). The following sentence is the comment: The solution to all the above is called MGTOW. That last all-capital word will be the reason for removal. Explanation: the MGTOW subreddits got banned so even just uttering the word will get MensRights banned. I was so informed several times by moderators. So we live in a world of banned words.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:17 AM
2

"There are also Mens Rights Activists that are misogynistic and think women should do what they're told and stay in the kitchen." Care to provide a link or quote? I don't know any such MRAs but maybe our definitions of MRAs might not be the same. "When women couldnt even vote ..." Until the passing of the 15th Amendment 1870, not all men voted either, only some. On the other hand, women got the right to vote in the Territory of Wyoming and the Territory of Utah before the 15th Amendment passed. …
/r/MensRights06/10/21 01:26 AM
1

Why men only? On the basis of that definition, "incel" includes a LOT of women. They are just older, namely in their late 30s, in their 40s, 50s and up. They are all female incels. Some call it "femcel". And since their ages span decades, and there are more women in general because men die younger, there are definitely more of them than male incels in their 20s. They are by far the bulk of the incel population. Offensive or not.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 10:01 PM
1

How about your respect for your father. Hypocrite.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:53 PM
1

I never said twice as many. Just "more". If your data are true, 70,000 more, in the US. Second, there is no "assumption" in these searches, only known facts. I do know, because I had read many of those articles before, that there will be many hits for "more men die", again I had read them. Just wanted to by helpful to help finding them. Ditto, for "women more affected". To me, it is just a known fact that there are many such claims / articles in the media because I had read them before. So the p…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:51 PM
1

OK, so you are not responding to anything of substance she said, only pointing out the channel. Well, I think it is primarily because you probably didn't even listen to it. So FYI: she didn't mention anything about class or wealth. The whole thing is a repetition and summary of a plethora of known men's issues, the subject of this subreddit. But it is incomplete, the situation is worse than she describes it. E.g. she doesn't mention that only women have reproductive and parental rights, divorce …
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:48 AM
2

OK, however, what she says is incomplete. No mentioning of the fact that in Western countries only women have reproductive rights and parental rights, among other things. I agree that reporters don't have to experience everything they report themselves but being comprehensive might be expected. Nonetheless, I am of course grateful that she says at least as much as she says.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:48 AM
2

I think you are right about that. That's why bans and censorship don't work, only make things worse. In my memory, before the bans and also a lot of what you can find on YT and other platforms, a lot of MGTOW is still about personal development and protecting personal autonomy and sovereignty by non-interaction with women. I think what happened is that feminists and women who follow them have a visceral, gut hatred of MGTOW that is completely irrational. MGTOW men by their very nature are free o…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:37 AM
1

Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p7am8f/more_men_than_women_are_raped_a_year_in_the_us/
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:23 AM
8

Feminists blame men for everything. Including the consequences of their own actions.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:21 AM
2

Here: https://www.usnews.com/news/healthiest-communities/articles/2020-04-29/us-marriage-rate-drops-to-record-low https://www.audacy.com/news/marriage-rates-in-the-u-s-drop-to-an-all-time-low and endless more. Just Google "marriages in us at all time low".
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:19 AM
1

Sure smarter than most Western men.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:17 AM
1

Maybe it's time to take your medications.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:11 AM
1

Just about any family or law court, moreover any college rape tribunal will tell you just that. That you don't know them personally, is only your luck. Trust me. If you are a man, you better not know them personally. But they still exist.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:10 AM
2

No. The feminist lie about DV is that 99.99% of it is men committing violence against women. So women commit only 0.01% of DV. Except that it is a total falsehood. In 70% of the cases of DV, women initiate physical violence. And at least half of the victims of DV are men. Probably more, given that men massively underreport their victimization. Now wonder. The law practically bans them from reporting. If police come out, the man gets automatically arrested, despite all evidence. Once they have th…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:08 AM
1

First of all, this society, and its media, will never admit anything good about men. For them, it is "woman good, man bad". Secondly, only self-declared victim identity wins. Feminists didn't get the power they have by "saying positive things about women". They didn't need to, men did that all through history. What they did is victim mentality, multiplied thousands and thousands time over in their propaganda. That works. Not a good thing, but true.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:03 AM
1

Look for "more men than women are raped a year in the US" on this subreddit. The end has references about perpetrators. For the rapes of men, the vast majority are women.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:59 AM
2

They DO harm. So much about their Hippocratic oath ...
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:57 AM
1

If the past is any guide ... https://infotonline.com/international-mens-day-2020-google-doodle/
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:56 AM
1

Happy International Men's Day for him.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:54 AM
1

So-called "women's rights activists". They are simply haters.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:53 AM
1

True. But there are also many feminist trolls on this subreddit. This is not like FDS where they simply don't allow men, period. They are full of hate but still there, and growing. Reddit shut down all MGTOW-related subreddits on false allegations. So much about Reddit. There are many feminist trolls here for sure.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:51 AM
3

The statistic is wrong. If you count "made to penetrate" as rape and if you count prison rape (especially male juvenile facility rapes) then more men than women are raped a year in the US. See article here on this reddit. It is just that the statistic deletes most rapes of men by definition. Not long ago there were officially zero (0) rapes of men because the definition of rape was "carnal knowledge of the female body".
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:48 AM
1

Yeah, show me a woman who every "didn't make a big deal of it" when she thought she was raped.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:44 AM
1

And most of the time is is traumatic, especially when the victims is an underage boy.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:43 AM
2

No. Girls and women have stronger immune systems than boys and men. Always have - in any epidemic and pandemic in history always more men died. https://www.livescience.com/16268-female-immune-system-stronger-males-genetics.html https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-kills-more-men-than-women-why-immune-system https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110927192352.htm This is one reason why women live 6 years longer than men. Not that any of this ever prevented this gynocent…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:41 AM
1

Wrong. As typical, more men die but "women most affected". Too long to list. Just Google "more men die of Covid than women" and - separately - "women are more affected by Covid". It is really educational. About the media and the whole societal system we live in.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:36 AM
1

Such as what?
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:28 AM
1

You cannot make something "cheerful" with this depressing reality. Imagine if somebody wanted to make it "more cheerful" for Jews in a concentration camp.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:28 AM
2

In Western countries EVERY DAY IS WOMEN'S DAY.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:26 AM
2

It is because of scums like you.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:25 AM
2

Good information, thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:22 AM
4

Now men in the West just need to follow the Korean lead.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:55 AM
8

In their 20s, that is, or maybe in their early 30s. Then they hit "the wall", and it's game over for them. They then of course blame men for it, instead of themselves for not saving themselves for a good man who actually would want to have a family with them - unlike the top 5 to 10%. The issue here is not that. The issue here is that after their 20s and early 30s, in South Korea already in their 30s, men won't marry them. Which is no wonder. The South Korean men are just ahead of us. Just my $0…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:55 AM
5

It is a choice - for women, that is. In their 20s and maybe early 30s. Then they hit "the wall" and it's game over for them. Little do they know what a surprise is waiting for them. When they find out, of course, they start whining and blaming men for everything, but hey, what else is new. Too late, however. That you can't find a woman to be even friends with, is entirely the fault of feminism, especially radical feminism, that slowly turns more and more women into men-hating, misandrist monster…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:50 AM
6

(1) Other than lying, the Korean women in their 30s who are actually married, are married to older men. Probably for the money. Like that is any surprise. Meanwhile probably a lot of Korean women in their 40s, 50s and up are divorced (or never married) and now nobody wants to marry them. (2) Trust me. "With online dating, women have sex with the top 20% of men, for ever" is definitely not forever. It is only in their 20s and maybe early 30s. After that, cats and box wine. They hit the so called …
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:42 AM
4

Exactly. Couldn't have written it better myself. There are several responders just to this one post of men who are divorced (probably got divorce raped by the ex) and say they will forever regret it. Definitely don't recommend it.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:38 AM
4

Read the rest of the replies to this. Other than lying, those Korean women in their 30s, who are actually married, are simply married to older men, probably for the money. Like that is any surprise.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:35 AM
3

I am sorry to hear that. Best of luck to you bro. Don't give up, you deserve the best in life.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:32 AM
7

OK, so I am not going to argue here about "terminology" when I don't even believe in it. I think words like "misogynist", "incel", "patriarchy", "man-splaining", "man-spreading" and similar phrases are simply feminist-invented curse words made up to shame men. OK, some (especially younger and inexperienced) men pick up a term like "incel" and apply it to themselves but only because these are repeated so endlessly in the media. Nobody heard about "incels", I don't know, maybe until about 10 years…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:31 AM
2

What she says it all true but I don't think she gets the real seriousness of the situation.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 05:43 PM
1

I hope you are right. But generally, gender quotas are not good for companies yet they are general practice. HR departments also are generally made up of women who have a big influence deciding "who is good for the company". As a man, I am generally afraid of them, but who knows, maybe I am wrong. What I read about here on MensRights is a lot of cases where companies haven't hired a single white man for decades. All under HR management and not generally good for the companies.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:09 AM
2

How about recording her, and collecting the recordings? HR will still be on her side, just a warning.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:43 PM
5

Yes, she does it because she can. She knows that he will get fired if he dares to call her out. She is a sadist and enjoys her (illegitimate) power.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:41 PM
14

India is a particularly bad radical feminist country. I can only feel sympathy for Indian men for being born there.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:39 PM
3

Let me propose a guessing game. State how long a sentence a man would have gotten if he had done this to a woman?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:34 PM
6

You are a known radical feminist troll on MensRights. Everything you say is an automatic and emphatic affirmation of all radical and extreme feminist views, even the most unjust. Like this, that hating men is just fine, no danger there. Don't be surprised if you are ignored.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:30 PM
2

A very disgusting and immoral opinion. IMHO.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:28 PM
6

Good luck. They ruin everything that a man might enjoy.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:27 PM
7

Very good advice. The more traffic we give them, the more they will do it, because it pays.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:26 PM
4

"there's nothing that women have that men will not expect them to share" Lie. Name a single right the men have that women do not. On the other hand, women have many rights and privileges that men don't. First on the list is that ONLY women have reproductive rights. Men have very limited parental rights, too, as opposed to women. So what men "expect to share" is what women DO have and men do NOT. While there is no such thing with the genders reversed (men have what women do not). Moreover, what i…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:24 PM
9

I am not sure it is "confusion". I think feminists and women who follow them genuinely believe that wanting equality on the part of men IS misogyny. One of the fundamental dogmas of feminism even if they lip-service deny this when directly confronted.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:14 PM
10

I am afraid it is a the world of Today. Beating up someone because he is white and male is the bread and butter of the media, academia, the judicial system and legislation. When it comes to physically beating up, see the endless videos on YT and elsewhere where scenes are acted out about a man berating or abusing a woman in public followed by instant intervention from people around and a man being hit by a woman and complete indifference and even laughter from people around. Or a woman acting ho…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:11 PM
10

Together with just about all the media in today's Western societies.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:06 PM
10

Google is extremely hostile to men, privileges women and has a very strong far left / woke / feminist bias. Together with all social and broadcast media companies, academia, legislation, judicial and executive branch systems. So it is no surprise that you found this. Despite all the hysteria about misogyny, misandry is generally accepted and supported (with only lip-service denials, only when directly confronted) and any talk about misandry being hate or that it should be banned is strictly forb…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:05 PM
1

Wikipedia is one of the many, many institutions that radical feminists "institutionally captured". Another one is the Southern Poverty Law Center, but we can easily count near-100% of the media and 100% of the family / divorce law courts and 100% of academia. So Wikipedia is very biased in a far left / woke / feminist direction, especially on social, race, gender and political issues. Expecting fair treatment of these subjects from Wikipedia is like expecting fair and neutral treatment of gender…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 04:56 PM
1

Got it, thanks.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 04:42 PM
1

I still think that the woke / feminist obsession with quota systems is a disaster to any society. People should get in their jobs for their merit and ability not for biological markers like their skin color of gender. The woke / feminist regime that controls most Western societies these days will lead to nothing good. Just to immense suffering and bloodshed, sooner or later. You read it here first. They are all race- and gender-Nazis.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:19 AM
2

Right. The only thing I can add is that everything they, meaning feminists, do to boys and men, the immense suffering they cause are just proofs that they are fascists. They are called feminazis for a reason. I really feel your pain but there is nothing I can do to help you. You are a victim of a cruel, brutal and unjust system. Just know that there are people who care about you and understand you, including me.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:14 AM
0

I totally agree with that. That's why I asked how come aigars2 thinks that men can end up lonely but not broke financially, just the opposite? Huh? A typical divorce leaves a man totally broke, financially, too, not just alone. I wish I could know what makes aigars2 so optimistic.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:11 AM
1

I am afraid sooner or later they will get that, too. The whole "gender pay gap" falsehood revolves around just that: force equal income to women DESPITE men working far longer hours and far harder than women. That's the goal and I think they will get it. I am really afraid of the future in this society, as a white man.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:07 AM
2

I don't know why you think men control the courts. There are probably as many female judges as male judges by now (although I admit I haven't research this issue). More of the problem is that male judges are not sympathetic to men, either. Most male judges are just as woke / feminist as female judges, often even more, because they are afraid of losing their careers if they dare not to be woke / feminist. So there is nothing "funny" about this. It is just a simple fact: the courts are woke and fe…
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:05 AM
1

Political representation doesn’t mean someone is of the same sex as the voter, it means they represent the voter’s interest. Well, I am not so sure about that. The fundamental flaw of "representative democracy" is a phenomenon called "corruption". I.e. humans can be bought. So in most cases a representative votes for the interest of the highest bidder (donor), not necessarily for the voters' interest. "She wasn’t appointed or voted in because she was female, but because her platform appealed to …
/r/MensRights29/09/21 03:58 AM
1

I have nothing to add. You and your sources might be perfectly correct, I have little information beyond what I read in the article. On the other hand the article says "Reports say just prior to the bridge collapsing, Flores and her team of female engineers and designers had been praised on social media." So here we go. I can either believe you or the "reports" that are not cited. In other words, I might just randomly pick one over the other. So I am no wiser, so I just say, at this point I don'…
/r/MensRights29/09/21 03:45 AM
1

And you find it just fine. That a man committed suicide and died. Because "they can't prove anything". Just FYI, the allegations said that "something was there to pursue". They investigated and found that "there was nothing there to pursue". So they found the exact opposite of what the allegations claimed. How is it nor a false allegation? Besides, it led to man's death. If you are OK with that, I have nothing more to discuss with you.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 03:31 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p7am8f/more_men_than_women_are_raped_a_year_in_the_us/ https://recalculatingthegenderwar.tumblr.com/post/162336650896/new-cdc-data-again-finds-as-many-if-not-more?fbclid=IwAR2p7927T6_CIGTPC5g_8z7LHj1oxC9nmWNwbkP-GHy5fNGmILoCgNTRAtM
/r/MensRights27/09/21 11:26 PM
1

/\ This.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 11:20 PM
3

You are a brave man. They can come after you for doing this.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 11:17 PM
4

That is not education you are getting there it is just abuse. I am horrified by this. I can't understand how this can be even legal. Telling the boy that men's issues are "not important". That's discrimination. I agree with other posters, form a mutual support group with other boys.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 11:15 PM
1

I don't understand what they are complaining about. They make up 84% of a market where everything is determined by supply and demand. What do they want? Do they want to get laws passed that "brands" cannot pay a man as an influencer more than a woman, no matter what? It is supply and demand. I don't see what their problem is.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 11:09 PM
5

People who go to university are indoctrinated, not "critical thinkers". Critical thinking is the last thing you learn at today's universities.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 07:31 PM
4

I agree with you 100%
/r/MensRights27/09/21 07:28 PM
0

How come?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 07:09 PM
2

It seems in this time and age you have to practically go underground because if you openly start a men's issues or men's rights group, it will be shut down by feminists instantly under the pretext of being "misogynist", "sexist" and "patriarchy". I don't know how to solve this problem. Our organizing is just not tolerated by the government and the media which are fully woke and feminists. Very unjust but this is a very unjust world.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 07:06 PM
1

They barely missed it it is 52% to 48% male to female after a recount. There are countries with female majority. "According to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, Rwanda leads the world with women making up 61 percent of its Chamber of Deputies, with Cuba, Nicaragua and Mexico on or just over the 50 percent mark." https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/27/iceland-almost-gets-female-majority-parliament All these countries have a "macho" image but, like so many misandrist claims, they are apparently unt…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:35 PM
2

Nobody said "female heavy" except you. The article said "female majority" and 52% is exactly that. Just FYI for a law to pass it needs a simple majority, in most cases, and a single vote, like 51% would be enough to pass a law, no matter how extreme.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:15 PM
1

The tremendous (and destructive) success of feminist power grab in Western societies is proof that gender ratios in parliaments are not what matter. 100% male legislations voted in voting rights for women and in the past hundred plus years since then majority male legislations voted in all the feminist and women-privileging laws that led to todays unbearable social conditions of men. I am wondering what a female-majority parliament will do. Feminists have absolutely no scruples about discriminat…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:10 PM
2

The epitome of female entitlement and arrogance, with a big dose of misandry. Uncritically accepts all unfounded and baseless feminist men-shaming falsehoods. Also a perfect example of why feminism makes women unhappier and unhappier. Feminism is as much a curse on women as it is on men.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:05 PM
3

That's exactly why they are called feminazis.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:56 PM
4

Men getting excluded from higher education is only an issue because how it affects women who are always "most affected", by anything. Including men not getting a decent education and suffering. By that "women most affected". The men themselves count for nothing. As for his "dangerous group" stuff, violent crime has been going down for decades and is a its lowest point in history both in the US and the UK.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:55 PM
5

Nobody is calling anybody "liars" here. Here is a report from a very far-left publication: https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2021/may/28/liam-scarlett-inquest-opens-into-ballet-choreographers-death Key quote: "The Royal Ballet said an independent investigation into his behaviour had found “no matters to pursue in relation to alleged contact with students of the Royal Ballet School”. He was innocent yet cancelled based purely on accusations that were found to be false. He killed himself by hangin…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:48 PM
7

Could you give links to those reports. I can find it neither on factcheck nor on Politico. The article doesn't say "all female crew", it says all female engineers who designed it. The construction crew is not claimed to be all female, only the designers. "Reports say just prior to the bridge collapsing, Flores and her team of female engineers and designers had been praised on social media."
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:31 PM
1

This video is at the end of the article and is really something. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&t=431s
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:21 PM
1

Good and powerful work.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:02 PM
12

Disagree. Men die in such higher numbers because nobody cares about their workplace safety. Laws are inadequate, companies don't invest in workplace safety for men. When it comes not just to the safety but to just the comfort of women they invest in it, or else. The other reason is that women refuse to do dangerous work so men ae the only ones to hire. What feminism has to do with this is their complete silence when it comes to this lop-sided situation that 94% of workplace fatalities are men, d…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:00 PM
1

"Most people today are appalled by the idea someone would be denied access to a venue because of their race. We should be equally as appalled at denying men access to a venue because of their sex." I am talking about the present. So FYI: ​ Black only classes, proms, graduation ceremonies do exist and are common. I don't know about white only ones. Women-only gyms and a myriad other women-only places exist. Most universities have numerous women only "spaces", women's academic centers, women's cou…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:23 PM
1

I don't know of many "white-only venues". In this day and age? I know of women-only venues and non-white-only venues. Fill me in. Tell me of white-only venues. Even the "Proud Boys" leader, Henry “Enrique” Tarrio is black.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:38 PM
1

Except that it is not "of unexplained cause". It is planed, intentional, self-interested and ideology based. Extorted from society by public pressure and PR methods.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:34 PM
1

Except it is not ""of unexplained cause". It is completely planned, intentional, self-interested and ideology based. Extorted by deliberate PR and public pressure methods.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:32 PM
3

Yes, there is a very open crusade by feminists to pass laws that say that women never have to go to prison no matter what they did. This includes murder and rape. No prison for women for either. An example is Canadian law professor Elizabeth Sheehy, who under the rubric of "battered woman syndrome" wants women get away with the murder of men on the basis that they had been "battered". Now, of course, expect the meaning of "battery" to gradually expand to a ridiculous extent, like it happened to …
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:15 AM
3

Blame all men, shame all men, kill all men.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:35 AM
3

Not just boys, men, too. "In 2012 Sonja B. Starr from University of Michigan Law School found that, controlling for the crime, "men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do," and "[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted", also based on data from US federal court cases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentencing_disparity Even Wikipedia admits this (and Wikipedia is an extremely biased, feminist and woke controlled outlet).
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:33 AM
2

When "the patriarchy", together with "toxic masculinity", "incel", "man-spreading", "man-splaining" and many other similar feminist-invented man-shaming curse words are not even real things and don't exist. A classic example is this video where students on a campus all strongly claim that "toxic masculinity" is some terrible problem society has, but then cannot define what "toxic masculinity" is - including a Gender Studies major. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsYKb3T13Wk
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:17 AM
6

Probably because they know that people read very superficially, mostly only the headlines, and glance at graphics without looking at the details. On a superficial look, a reader might get the impression that women are the pink line, men are the blue line and therefore the misperception that it is actually women who are killed at 4 times the rate of men.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:04 AM
2

The result of ten seconds of Google search: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02006-z https://www.genderandcovid-19.org/resources/women-are-most-affected-by-pandemics-lessons-from-past-outbreaks/ https://www.montana.edu/news/20752/msu-research-shows-women-disproportionately-affected-by-pandemic https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathycaprino/2020/07/13/how-the-pandemic-is-negatively-impacting-women-more-than-men-and-what-has-to-change/?sh=7143b535554b https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/w…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:47 AM
1

That woman is simply a monster.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:20 AM
1

46% are women and children ... But, you see, half of those children are boys ... but counted as part of "women and children". If we knew the ratio of women vs. children and we had lumped boys and men together, the percentage of women and girls would be even less than 46%. Probably way less, given how young the average age is in Afghanistan. But "1 in 4 homeless people are women" is indeed a peculiar way of saying that "80% of the homeless are men". It is peculiar but also typical. In this age th…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:19 AM
2

Like the Sarah Everard case. The feminist and woke press seeks out a single incident, an anecdote, and serves it as "conclusive proof" of some complete falsehood (like men are all rapists and killers and women should be in constant fear of men etc.) Meanwhile reality is something totally different. Speaking of the Sarah Everard case, it went on for weeks, ad nauseam, that "2 women disappear from the streets every week" in the UK. So, 1 women disappears every 3.5 days. The horror, the abyss, the …
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:03 AM
1

FYI: There ARE women-only gyms.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:46 AM
3

As far as I know that subreddit started out to be a place where men shared their experiences of sexless relationships. Then women came in droves, squeezed out the men and now it is the exact opposite. It is women complaining about their sex lives and how it is men's fault, like everything else.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:34 AM
2

Sorry for the repeat. ​ If you don't think women feel entitled, how about just reading a little FDS (Female Dating Strategy). The don't allow men, by the way. Not that any subreddit would survive for a minute if it tried to exclude women.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:25 AM
2

If you don't think women feel entitled, how about just reading a little FDS (Female Dating Strategy). The don't allow men, by the way. Not that any subreddit would survive for a minute if it tried to exclude women.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:24 AM
2

When a single parent alone kills their children it is in 71% of the cases the mother who kills her children while in only 29% of the cases it is the father. http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php Without speculating on the reasons (like "envy" of children) it is just a fact that mothers are a lot more murderous when it comes to their children than fathers. It probably has to do with the fact that women, on average, are more aggressive and violent than men, as shown by the f…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:08 AM
1

It is funny to me, this general "consensus" (of which I am absolutely no part of) that "women's lives are worth more than men's lives". This is as cynical as claiming that "Aryans' lives are worth more than Jews' lives" as it was once claimed in a certain country. IMHO there can absolutely no "value difference" be placed on the life of a human being. All human beings deserve the exact same respect, safety, freedom and protection. The reason why it is funny to me because, actually, there are more…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:00 AM
3

Yes. As far as I know some 80% of violent crime is directed at men, not women, in the UK and the US. It is also true that the perpetrators of the violence are mostly men. Except in case of domestic violence where women initiate something like 70% of physical domestic violence. It is also backed up by evidence that more man are raped a year than women in the US if you count "made to penetrate" and prison rape as rapes. (As you should.) Rape is a violent crime. About 80% of the perpetrators of rap…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:47 AM
2

Maybe we should start a defense fund for him and collect money for his legal fees.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:42 AM
3

It’s almost to the point that I recommend men stay off campus altogether. IMHO that is the real end goal: to exclude men from higher education and thus making all future decision makers (politicians, lawyers, judges, CEOs) all women. So what's going on right now is an ever harder hitting campaign to remove as many men as possible from campuses and deny men any chance of a higher education. The first method is to make K-12 education hell for boys and push only girls to succeed. They did/are doing…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:40 AM
2

Even the phrasing is so cynical. "after the sudden death of family members". This obviously was meant as "husbands died" but of course (a) they are never called "men" or "husbands" or anything that implies their gender, they are just "family members" - no reference to gender is allowed when men suffer or die in the media (b) not a comma of any sympathy for the actually dead person. Because he is a man. It is all about bitching about "women most affected". Even though they are the ones who are al…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:00 AM
1

Only in self-defense, when they are physically attacked by a woman. E.g. being slapped in the face (that women are very fond of doing to men).
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:44 AM
2

How come, then, that harsher punishments for boys don't go against everything we stand for (equality).
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:39 AM
1

Interesting how the school systems think the exact opposite. All the expectations are about girls, everything is focused on them while boys are met with "low expectations", read their development, learning and needs are completely neglected. As a result boys don't get a decent education and then the whole media and society feigns "surprise" that, gee, more women get in college than men (which was the plan from the beginning).
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:36 AM
1

Equal rules should apply and equal punishments, given that feminists claim they are about "equality" and "equity".
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:32 AM
2

You cannot "do something" for men when you get shut down instantly and get punished and cancelled for it. Privileged feminists who have all powers, including all the government powers, behind them naturally don't get how easy it is for them to "do something" (more and more, again an again) that benefits women. They get only praise and instant obedience by the government. However if somebody tries to advocate men's issues, do something for them or form a group supporting men's rights, the effort …
/r/MensRights25/09/21 08:52 PM
2

I have the same question.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 08:14 PM
4

Female predator at her worst. Women apparently now assume that if they are attracted to a man then that man has an obligation to have sex with them. If he refuses, they use the very sad fact that they can destroy a man by a false allegation. So basically they consider men as sexual slaves and toys and destroy them if they refuse to perform sexual services for them. They simply force men into sex whether the man wants it or not. That is, BTW, the definition of rape: forcing someone to have sex wi…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 03:41 PM
5

What I would want to know how is many "rape cases" with evidence that actual rape happened don't lead to conviction. I am pretty sure, unless you prove me wrong with data and evidence, that actually proven rape cases definitely lead to convictions. I would say 100% of the time because rape is a serious crime, second only to murder, that is punished very harshly by our laws. 98% of accusations of rape may not lead to conviction because maybe they are just accusations without any evidence. An accu…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 09:46 AM
2

Are you sure these aren't just your prejudices? How do white men "treat the rest of society"? How do black men "treat black women"? Do yo have any evidence of your claims? Claiming and spreading prejudices against other people without evidence is not nice to other people.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 09:40 AM
2

Thank you. That is definitely my go-to place now for MGTOW discussions.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:32 PM
6

This is a typical female-written article. It doesn't have the words "boy", "girl", "male" or "female" in it once. Meanwhile three quarters or more of suspensions and expulsions are for boys. It is always "students". Generally, in the media, when something bad happens, the reporting always specifies if it happened to women or girls. When is happens to men or boys, the victims are only "people", "workers", "students", "villagers" and other gender-free descriptions. It is an absolute requirement in…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:11 PM
3

No, you are absolutely not the asshole. They are. Cut them off. Change phone numbers or whatever is necessary to cut them off. Never talk to them again.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:02 PM
2

What's exactly wrong with straight while males? And what do straight white males have to do with these gender wars within the black community? Just wondering because straight white males are so casually demonized by everybody and used as somehow the synonym of "evil", like "bogeyman" used to be. Not acceptable.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:58 PM
12

"He said, she said" has changed meaning. It is now "he said, she said, and therefore she is believed".
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:52 PM
1

There is https://ruqqus.com/+MGTOW but looks pretty dead.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 03:18 AM
4

There is no real reason to ban any MGTOW space, online or off line. MGTOW is a lifestyle and philosophy of personal autonomy and personal sovereignty. It is the lifestyle of a man who wants to focus on his own ideas, goals and self-realization. He wants to be guided by his own internally generated goals and not by other people's expectations and he wants to serve his own visions not other people. Part of this mission is non-interaction with women to avoid being deprived of his autonomy by them. …
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:57 AM
1

"Aggarwal announced that this is the first in a series of initiatives Ola is undertaking to create a more inclusive workforce" So EXCLUDING all men makes the workforce inclusive ... Good to know.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:14 AM
1

Feminism is a billion dollar business worldwide and in the US alone. To force politicians to vote for billions in budgets for programs to "solve" made up issues that allegedly affect women, they have to maintain the false narrative of "evil men oppressing women". That's the root of the issue.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 01:47 AM
6

False accusers, when found that they lied, should get the same penalty the accused would have gotten should the accusation had found to be true.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:13 PM
1

Note that white men in particular are at the bottom in college enrollments. In all income categories, except in the highest income category where they are the second lowest only after Hispanic men.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:10 PM
2

BTW, in case of Kavanaugh there was zero evidence. Christine Blasey Ford perjured herself and was never called out on it. Everybody she named as witnesses never remembered even that there had been a party let alone being there. The FBI interrogated hundreds of people about Kavanaugh and no evidence ever came up.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:09 PM
9

Reddit is a ban-and-censor media.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:48 PM
6

If it was a man, it wouldn't be called "had sex with". It would be called RAPE. Funny how the media never uses the R word in case of women rapists.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:45 PM
4

Police must do what feminist politicians and judges order them to to. Bettina Arndt has some interesting videos about how police are getting tired of being used as a feminist injustice enforcement tool.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:28 PM
2

So very true. My view, exactly.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:26 PM
6

I used to think the same but as I found out more about the history of feminism I know longer believe it. Feminism started in 1848 at Seneca Falls, NY with the "Declaration of Sentiments". That was already, right there, a fully misandrist hate speech manifesto against men. Totally unnecessarily, justified by nothing. Meanwhile there was a general "universal suffrage" movement. Of which the "suffragettes" were part but it would have prevailed without them, anyway. Men got the universal suffrage, m…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:24 PM
11

There is a lot of evidence that women are more aggressive and violent than men. (1) 70% of physical violence is initiated by women in domestic violence cases: http://www.newscastmedia.com/domestic-violence.htm (2) Of all relationships, lesbian couples have the most domestic violence, straight couples are in the middle, gay male couples have the least domestic violence: https://wentworthreport.com/2017/01/08/rate-of-domestic-violence-highest-in-lesbian-relationships/ https://freerepublic.com/focu…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:01 PM
1

Username checks out. Red cobras are known to like justice and fairness. Too bad.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:53 PM
4

It is not even that subconscious. They pretty much do it openly and with full intention.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:51 PM
11

It is called "turning on the waterworks". I don't know, I am different. I am not moved at all by it. Anybody can fake crying and put up some drama. A man can do it, too. Men are just not inclined to do it, they don't like drama. So in a situation when I clearly know that a woman did something wrong, and starts crying to cover it up, I am very capable of looking at her with an ice cold look and say something that "OK, honey, why don't you just stop that circus? Who do you think you will fool with…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:47 PM
6

The only women who stand up to feminist injustices like the one the OP described in his post are women MRAs. They are, however, very few in numbers. Maybe like 0.0001 percent of women (I don't know about more than 1 or 2 dozens in a country of 330 million people). So 99.9999 % of women don't stand up to feminism even when they don't explicitly identify with the "feminist" label. But they silently support feminism because it benefits them. Feminism brings them all the privileges women have in Wes…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:32 PM
1

The Washington Post article is from 2018 so it is not "historical". It lays out that men should be reduced to de facto slavery. BTW, I looked up every single negative claim she makes about men and none of them is true. They are all fabricated and frauds. Recommending the SCUM Manifesto as a "best summer read" is also from 2018. Both very much summarize the present misandrist political climate and the present political and media power system. Not a historical one. As for the WP article, it is not…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:02 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:44 AM
5

When I had health issues I could go to the doctor only during lunch breaks, as a man.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:17 AM
1

Nobody should be allowed to do anything "retroactive". In absolutely no other context does the law accept "retroactive" acts. What, in a corporate contract between two companies, or in a treaty before two countries, or whatever, can you imagine it being declared legal that one party just " retroactively" breaks any contract? "Retroactive removal of consent" is the biggest boondoggle ever made up. It shows the extreme power concentrated in the hands of feminists that they can massage these type o…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:07 AM
1

Paternity fraud should be a very serious crime because it hurts two, not one people. The father AND the child. I would propose a lot longer prison sentences with a mandatory minimum and a lot more money. Paternity fraud is about ruining the lives of two people, how could it be not a crime, in particular a very serious crime?
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:00 AM
5

That's a really weird rant. Basically the writer is fuming against feminism because it alienates men from being an automatic slave to women. But the bottom line for her is that men should automatically enslave themselves to serve the needs of women, i.e. she is full of female entitlement. It is a really bizarre piece. Simultaneously demanding that men be kept on the plantation, and attacking feminism whose goal is just that. She doesn't understand feminism, doesn't understand men and absolutely …
/r/MensRights11/09/21 12:56 AM
53

One of the biggest ironies of FTM transition is that the person wasn't told and wasn't prepared for what reality would feel like once a man. I have read and heard multiple stories like this when FTM men are shocked by the treatment they receive post-T. It is the first time in their lives to come to grips with how awful the treatment of men is in this feminist-controlled society. They never believed for a second during their whole pre-T life what MRAs talked about all along. Then they transition …
/r/MensRights11/09/21 12:13 AM
1

They are "feminist icons" together with Andrea Dworkin. They are actually influential, for example the by now dead Valerie Solanas is touted as a "perfect summer read" for feminists: https://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/07/29/scum-manifesto-perfect-summer-vacay-read/ The fact that you never heard about such influential and famous "leading lights" of feminism just shows that you are not very educated and informed about feminism to begin with. So you are really not that qualified to proclaim broad…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 11:55 PM
2

You take care, too, bro, best of luck to you in everything.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 06:46 AM
1

(1) The SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas (exterminate all men, a.k.a "Kill all men". That would be killing 4 billion human beings, 666 times the number of Hitler's victims.) (2) Sally Miller Gearhart (Reduce males to 10% of the population. (That would be killing 3.6 billion human beings = 600 times Hitler's victims, and continuing the killing fields forever in the future.) (3) https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-cant-we-hate-men/2018/06/08/f1a3a8e0-6451-11e8-a69c-b944de66d9e7_story.html…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 06:38 AM
1

Everything in life because this is a gynocentric society. Like, duh!
/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:53 AM
2

Also read a much newer article: https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-university-fall-higher-education-men-women-enrollment-admissions-back-to-school-11630948233
/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:46 AM
1

Such a good article, more people should read it.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:44 AM
1

Unbelievable. He get 120 years in prison and she just sits at home pretty. "Feminist justice" A total oxymoron.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:37 AM
1

Yes, that's the infographics from https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-university-fall-higher-education-men-women-enrollment-admissions-back-to-school-11630948233 I hope you can read the article.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:07 AM
1

The K-12 education system is extremely hostile to boys, by design. Essentially, everything is done to stunt boys' learning and mental development, precisely to make sure that for the most part women get the overwhelming majority of college degrees, with the consequence that most powerful and politically connected jobs go to women in the future. The feminists movement's goals is to establish a society with females supremacy, and doing this by the education systems is a key strategy.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:05 AM
1

There is now way that in 1947 men made ten times as much for the same job with the same qualifications per hour as women. Such a claim would be a total absurdity. The reality is that today, under 30, women make more money than men, on average, as a result of this growth difference.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:43 AM
1

Misandry has no limits in this society. This is a sick and perverted society. It is time to end it in its current form.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:39 AM
2

The 2.7% is bogus. This is how it came about: a feminist paper states that - in about 2% of the cases accusations are proven to be false. - in about 2% of the cases accusations are proven to be true. - in 96% of the cases it cannot be determined if the accusation is true or false. This is due to the inherent near-impossibility to determine truth when all the evidence is one person's word against the other person's word. It is rare to have actual physical evidence in such cases as mere accusation…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:35 AM
1

In the US at least more people die of prostate cancer than of breast cancer.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:20 AM
3

Empty justification for socially engineered injustice against men. I guarantee you it will never end, certainly not as the will of the feminists. Their goal is female supremacy and the reduction of men to manual labor in a slavery-like condition with no human, political or civil rights, this time practicing slavery on a gender basis. But good job promoting their agenda on a "men's rights" subreddit. Shame on you.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:25 PM
1

That's the only part of the article with no source or data or evidence other than hearsay. I don't believe it without data showing it.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:21 PM
1

Why and how exactly are women suffering, given their immense privileges in this gynocentric society? I am asking this in comparison with men. Most people suffer from certain things that are universal but men have extra suffering due to societal reasons.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:18 PM
2

It exposes the mass murderous, genocidal / gendercidal nature of feminism. They either want to exterminate men completely as in The SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas or reduce men to 10% of the population as demanded by Sally Miller Gearhart. In other words, her words show it once again that feminism is pure fascism.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:16 PM
2

They mean that we should be exterminated as demanded by the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas or reduced to 10% of the population as demanded by Sally Miller Gearhart. Two of their leading lights.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:13 PM
1

Like those people who banned MGTOW and MGTOW2 on Reddit. Reddit is so much hated by women and feminists that you better not declare that you are one if you have a job. They will go after you.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:08 PM
1

Paywall.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:01 PM
3

It is a total shame that men's spaces, online or offline, are hated, persecuted and banned by feminists so horribly and effectively that there are very few places where men can gather and express support and solidarity for each other. This is one, and this is in a constant danger of being banned, just like the MGTOW and MGTOW2 subreddits were. You have my full support bro, but I am afraid of the future when even this place might be eliminated by feminists. They are absolutely shameless and won't…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:57 PM
4

In my opinion feminism is a neo-Marxist totalitarian movement, and since it selects a minority group in the population, (chiefly white) men, as a designated target of hatred and even extermination (e.g. SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas and Sally Miller Gearhart) on a purely biological basis just like the Nazis picked the Jews as a target group, it is a contemporary, virulent form of fascism, that exceeds Nazism by orders of magnitudes (a target of 4 billion men vs 6 million victims of Hitler).
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:50 PM
113

This is an infamous case. The previous Director of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), Alison Margaret Saunders, the first female in this position, came into office with the plan to increase prosecution numbers for rapes by something like one third. No matter how. So she directed the CPS to find "rape" cases by framing completely innocent men. Pearson was randomly picked by this actress passing through Waterloo station. They passed each other in a fraction of a second, Pearson's hands holding i…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:38 PM
3

Let that sink in that these people who are capable of attacking men with these fully depraved ideas are complete perverts. The obscene and fully hypothetical thoughts they come up with are heinous. How many cases does anyone know, ever, total, when a father raped his daughter, let alone collected money for it? Really, give me the full list of cases, I demand it. Let that sink in that a father who rapes his daughter - if there ever was such a horrible case - is a completely mentally sick person. …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:21 PM
8

This is how horrible this society has become. Of course the best defense would be not to hire women, period. The problem is that then they will attack you and your business and accuse you of "sexism" and "misogyny" and "gender discrimination". So essentially they force female employees on you and then abuse the fact that women can get away with false accusations. A perfect Catch 22. What a horrible society to live in. This must end, some way, somehow, somewhen.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:14 PM
10

When a parent alone kills their children it is 71% of the time the mother and 29% of the time the father. https://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php No surprise here.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:07 PM
13

Yes, it was. 1848 - "Declaration of Sentiments"
/r/AntiFeminists09/09/21 06:39 AM
2

She would be given two choices: - do as the man wants it and give birth. The assumption being that they discussed this before an there was and agreement earlier that they would have the baby (this is just and assumption though, maybe they never discussed it, bad mistake). Or - OK, go ahead without his permission but then a judge and lawyers have to work out a penalty in form of some sort of compensation for him for "pain and suffering". She would owe a significant amount of money to him, as deci…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:40 AM
3

Fatal flaw in comments supporting her "business sense" because she has to pay mortgage (which is not clear given she says she "owns" the place): She gets all the equity. He gets zero (0) equity. That's not "dual effort". Just fraud, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:55 AM
2

Note how carefully the title is worded. The woman is called "teacher" and the boys is called "student". Completely gender neutral, knowing that most people just browse headlines and don't read deeper into most articles. IMHO the proper title would be "Female teacher rapes underage boy" but they never want to refer to perpetrator as a "woman" or "female" but above all they never want to refer to a rape victim as a "man" or "boy" or "male". Very much unlike in cases when the rapist is a man and th…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:50 AM
17

A man wouldn't have gotten away without any consequences like this woman did.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:46 AM
3

I totally agree with every word you say, probably the "funny ... because men ..." phrasing got me off track. In that case, apologies for misreading. I didn't call you a feminist. It was just a hypothetical question whether you meant this phrasing as an attempt to blame men for women making less, even though that is all down to their own choices. What I meant was that if the answer were "yes", then that would be feminist statement. They do tend to blame men for everything, including women's poor …
/r/MensRights08/09/21 02:06 AM
1

OK, I misunderstood your claim but this is even more bizarre. When was the last time anybody could "force" a woman to give birth? As it stands now it is exclusively the woman's decision whether to have an abortion or not, the father has no say in it. This is not about making abortion illegal at all. I am for sure not for making abortion illegal, just the opposite. I think this planet has an overpopulation problem and the last thing we need is more babies. What I am saying is that either (a) if w…
/r/MensRights08/09/21 01:07 AM
2

Hoff-Sommers, Chapter 4 - "Carol Gilligan and the Incredible Shrinking Girl", specifically page 101 sqq about "How Schools Shortchange Girls". I really recommend that you read at least this chapter (although the whole book would be even better). The debunking about the volume being turned off comes from a different source but I cannot locate it now. They may have scrubbed it from the Internet. It was written by a woman scholar who re-analyzed the evidence. However, plenty of other sources exist,…
/r/MensRights08/09/21 12:49 AM
1

Which makes the sensible decision to be something like ... hmm ... MGTOW.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:52 PM
3

"This will hurt marriages" Yes. Alas, the concept of "unintended consequences" applies to feminism, too. "t’s obvious men have decided to opt out of the societal norms we once had." People do what the incentives given to them direct them to do.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:50 PM
2

In other words, the whole thing is not centered on making good entertainment but on satisfying political demands, mandates and quotas. Guaranteed to fail. IMHO. Feminist films don't exactly have a good track record at the box office. Maybe this one will still get good box office numbers but that's because this is a bait-and-switch, just as you described. So people are, in effect, lured in the movie theater on false premises. But they will figure this out, and the next 007 film, with her on the p…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:46 PM
2

Its funny because even with all that, men are still out earning women overall (because his electrician job pays more than her Social Work job that she went and got a degree for). How do men consistently find themselves ahead financially while they theoretically find themselves behind in all these categories? There is nothing "funny" about this. The reason men make more as electricians and women less as Social Workers is entirely down to women's own choices. Nothing but absolutely nothing prevent…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:37 PM
2

OK, so this will be long. Apologies for that. But I have no choice than digging into your claims one by one. "Consider the distribution of intelligence ..." and all that after it. Absolutely no statistics prove that men's shrinking numbers in higher ed. are due to boys / men having lower intelligence. Even on the average level. This issue is not a result of intelligence differences. But they have created an intensely hostile-to-boys education system, completely built around the needs, privileges…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:09 PM
2

Anecdotes don't prove anything. Even though they are the favorite "arguments" of feminists, also known as "lived experience". Except only some people's "lived experiences" are cared about. Only statistics prove anything - as long as they are not fabricated, like the "1 in 3 women are raped" and the "how schools shortchange girls" type frauds. Fraud being the favorite "research" method of "feminist scholarship". It might also be time to get out of your decades old storylines. You talk about thing…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:16 PM
3

"Congress relying on feminist research for gender information is like relying on KKK research for racial information." What a good line. Can I use it?
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:06 PM
1

That's a problem. Shall I copy the text and the infographics?
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:04 PM
1

Gotta love how misandry is always turned around to be misogyny Standard feminist procedures.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:04 AM
1

That never prevents feminist publications to heap praise on FDS. What an obscene show.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:03 AM
1

Because they make up artificial privileges out of the possession of a uterus. In effect, ONLY women have reproductive rights, men have none. And when a woman gets pregnant with a man's sperm, no matter how (including even when she committed statutory rape against a minor), he is enslaved for life, typically. That's why women wouldn't be for that - at least the vast majority. A small minority is fair minded enough, though, but that's small, really small, minority.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:02 AM
1

Both eggs and sperm have been already made from stem cells. The only missing element is the artificial uterus.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:59 AM
2

You bet.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:58 AM
1

Artificial uteruses were wonderful, but don't bet the barn on their arrival. The feminists (and probably the vast majority of women) will do absolutely everything to declare it illegal and ban it. That's because they make up a "right" (namely that 100% of reproductive rights belong to women, i.e. ONLY women have reproductive rights) out of the uterus. They are not going to lose that golden egg without a fight, trust me. I think we men definitely should develop an artificial uterus and make its u…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:58 AM
1

The man's body, too. No woman can get pregnant without a man's sperm, and half the baby's DNA comes from the father. The baby is half the father's as a result. The sperm came from his body, it was part of his body. The uterus is simply a delivery mechanism. All mammals, including all sheep and goats, reproduce the same way with no big hoopla. Mother Nature settled no this delivery mechanism millions of years ago. It is an involuntary and automatic process. Gives 0 extra reproductive rights to wo…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:51 AM
1

I am afraid hate clouds your mind. What he says is this: currently, until laws change, men don't have 50% reproductive rights. They have 0% of reproductive rights. Women have 100% of reproductive rights. Period. A woman can make a man a father by paternity fraud, against his will (punctured condoms, lying about being on the pill, sperm theft or just naming a man as a father of her child when the child is not his etc.), without any consequences for her. Then later, when a baby is on the way, the …
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:45 AM
1

I answered your question.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:36 AM
1

Who said forcing? This is about consensual sex. Forcing, i.e. rape, is a whole different issue, that is a crime and their are, draconian, laws against it. It is the second most serious crime after murder. Separate issue.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:35 AM
2

Yes, if she has all the reproductive rights then she should have all the reproductive and parental responsibilities. The other alternative is: he has half of the reproductive responsibilities (such as raising the child) but then he has half of the reproductive and parental rights, too. So no getting pregnant without his agreement. No abortion without his agreement. It is just as much "his body, his choice". Make your choice. But the ridiculously unfair deal that women and feminists want: all the…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:30 AM
1

I don't think it is that messy at all. In fact it is quite simple. We just have to look at this on the basis of reality, not on the basis of political declarations and mandates. So here goes: No woman can give birth without a man's sperm. The sperm came from his body, and was part of his body. As a result, the child's DNA is half of that of the father's. So the child is half his. Accordingly, he should have exactly equal rights in deciding about whether to get pregnant, when, whether to have an …
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:21 AM
1

Men are even forced to pay child support when they are the victims of statutory rape. An adult woman forces herself on and underage boy. If she gets pregnant, the boy has to start paying "child support" the minute he turns 18. (His parents pay until then.) Despite the fact that the woman was found guilty of statutory rape. Many such stories are reported here on this subreddit. If that is not obscene, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:07 AM
1

It sounds like, and it is.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:04 AM
1

Completely rational and reasonable deduction. Pure logic. We need more like this. /s
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:02 AM
3

Yeap. The "patriarchy" thing has other names, too. Like "collective guilt" and "guilt by association". It was the Nazis go-to justification for the mass murder of Polish people when they occupied Poland.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:00 AM
1

Please do.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:59 AM
3

Men usually don't give shit what clothes a woman is wearing. The whole fashion thing is female competition with other females, but hey, let's blame men for it, why not.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:57 AM
1

I would add that we need to point out that currently in the US men have zero (0) reproductive rights. A woman can make a man a father by many methods of paternity fraud (punctured condoms, lying about being on the pill, sperm theft, or just by naming a man the father of her child when it is not the man's child etc.). Later, when there is a baby on the way, women can decide to have an abortion as they wish. THE FATHER'S AGREEMENT OR SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED, he has no say in it. So currently ONL…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:52 AM
6

OK, now visualize a movie made for "men's fantasy" and consists of nothing but idiotic and evil women doing stupid and evil things, and wonderful, intelligent and strong men doing all kind of good things, including correcting women's mistakes. Now visualize such things in the move like the mice were intelligent, so must have been male because "everybody knows that mice are boys and the ugly stupid rats are girls". Now visualize your reaction to such a movie. Or just about anybody else's reaction…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:46 AM
2

I haven't noticed that. Gay men are usually welcome and supported. And called "bro" on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:35 AM
2

Because everyone knows mice are girls and rats are boys That's as dumb as it gets.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:32 AM
1

Yes, we noticed this, long long ago. Disney hasn't made a movie for boys with a positive male role model for 25 or more years. Pixar is different, even though it is owned by Disney. But Disney itself is just a feminist propaganda machine. What a shame.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:29 AM
3

Woman good, man bad.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:26 AM
0

And absurd, too, IMHO. Consider that the next 007 will not be called James Bond, and will be a black woman. Completely realistic. We want a spy who stands out as much as possible. Other than that, all the omens are just lined up fabulously. I am fearing a franchise-killer. I am also wondering if it is just me, but all the promotional posters seem to have Daniel Craig on it. Shouldn't it be her on the poster? Just weird, but maybe it is just me.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:17 AM
2

Gay men are a "protected category", that's why. It is not their fault, the feminist overlords decide these things. But I read it here several times that many gay men are against the establishment and don't want to be part of that circus. They also don't want to be fetishized (objectified) by women and don't want to be part of the "contemporary gay scene" which is a cartoon version of a gay man's real life.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:58 AM
2

I watched on Amazon Prime as much as I could but it wasn't much. Just horrible. A pain to watch. In fact a film critic wrote that "flat performances and clunky dialogue make watching often feel like a chore." That's a real understatement. UPDATE: Amazon informed me that "After carefully reviewing your submission, your review could not be posted to the website. It appears your review had inappropriate content." No hint about what was "inappropriate". The only four-letter words I used were "crap" …
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:54 AM
3

The second issue is that women make up most of the spending decisions. That is the root problem. Capitalism always caters to the highest bidder. We men need to turn this around. MGTOW men do this automatically. But all the other men have to withhold as much money as possible from getting into women's hands and they need to make more and more of the purchasing decisions. We should spend on ourselves and not on someone else. They have an income, let them spend that.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:51 AM
7

Same here.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:47 AM
2

I am an Amazon client and I rated this on Amazon as it deserves it. It is also amazingly polarizing because the vast majority of the ratings are either 5 star or 1 star (lowest). Something tells me the 5-star ones are almost all women and feminists. The 1-star ones probably a lot of MRAs. This stuff looks like it was designed not really as entertainment but as a divisive and polarizing propaganda product, and it shows. It is also based on a lot of popular rock and pop songs, very little original…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:46 AM
26

Hoff-Sommers also correctly states that the WEEA was passed in Congress based on a fraud. A fabricated "report" with the title "How Schools Shortchange Girls" was used to create a faux moral panic and PR-pressure politicians to vote for it. Within a few years a woman researcher demanded, received and re-analyzed the data and found total fraud. Such as turning off the sound of video recordings and falsely count that teachers "interact more with boys than girls". When she, the researcher, turned t…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 01:48 AM
2

Read the article. They quote a source for every single claim they make. Just as AMos050 just pointed out
/r/MensRights07/09/21 01:37 AM
15

I never "reported" on the gender pay gap. In my humble, that is the most ridiculous, most detached from reality and most delusional accusation. It has been debunked too many times but they keep "reporting" it, to create the impression that it is real. Ditto with "patriarchy", "rape culture", "1 in 3 women are raped", "man-spreading / splaining", the list is endless. But they constantly talk about these things in the media so that people get the impression that these are a thing. So my take: the …
/r/MensRights07/09/21 01:36 AM
12

Those physical jobs are dirty, dangerous, physically demanding and have limited room for promotions. The issue here is the - in my mind intentionally and socially engineered - exclusion of men from professional jobs that have power and money, like lawyers, doctors etc. I think the "grand plan" is to deny most men the possibility of upward mobility in society, in order to ensure that the most powerful and politically connected jobs are filled with women. It is a feminist power grab, long planned,…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 01:16 AM
2

No. First of all "It's her house, he's living in it." implies full ownership, not mortgage. Second, the biggest problem with this the deception, the fact that the man doesn't know any of this. Nothing can be a "dual effort" unless both parties are in the know, and they willingly agreed to the deal. Thirdly, nothing can be a "dual effort" when one party doesn't get anything from it. If this is a mortgage situation as you claim, she gets all the equity, the man builds zero equity out of this "dual…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 12:04 AM
4

The language "He pays all the rent and all major bills" is clear: she lives in a unit with a man, and the man doesn't know that secretly he is paying the rent to her, the owner of the unit. The reference to "all the major bills" leaves no ambiguity that she is referring to the bills of the place where she lives in. Otherwise whose "major bills" would she be talking about? Also "I owned this place for 5 years now" might imply that she no longer has a mortgage on the place so the rent goes to her …
/r/MensRights06/09/21 11:47 PM
1

You are right. More sources need to be considered. We should add "The SCUM Manifesto" by Valerie Solanas that argues for the complete extermination of all men and boys, and the writings of Sally Miller Gearhart who demands that the number of males must be reduced to 10 percent. Also the RedFem Hub people who were discussing what to do with the flesh of all killed men: bones to make soap and glue, skin to make leather, but how about the flesh? See, the use of human bones for soap and glue, and th…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:15 AM
1

You are right. More sources need to be considered. We should add "The SCUM Manifesto" by Valerie Solanas that argues for the complete extermination of all men and boys, and the writings of Sally Miller Gearhart who demands that the number of males must be reduced to 10 percent. Also the RedFem Hub people who were discussing what to do with the flesh of all killed men: bones to make soap and glue, skin to make leather, but how about the flesh? See, the use of human bones for soap and glue, and th…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:15 AM
2

I have never seen anybody more practical, organized and motivated than feminists. And, as far as my observation goes, they do show every single symptom of the Dark Triad. It maybe that the worst ones end up in leadership positions, but when that happens it shows everything about the "movement". See Communism - Stalin, Nazism - Hitler etc. etc. The Fuhrers are the best representation of the true nature of the movement. That's why they rose to the leadership.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:50 AM
1

The truth hurts, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:36 AM
3

In most of the world any advocacy of men's rights is automatically labeled "misogyny", "sexist", "patriarchy", "incel" and whatever other curse words feminists invent. Good luck with "explaining" especially to feminists and women who are influenced by feminism.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:34 AM
1

"Passionate friendship" between men was a very common, accepted and even admired emotion going back to the Romantic era. It is the gradual degradation of society since then that led to it being no accepted any more. I wish there was still passionate friendships between men, and that it were accepted and admired socially. Personally, I admire your relationship with that man and I wish both of you only the best.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:49 AM
1

All "waves" of feminism are the same, going back to Seneca Fall, NY in 1848. It is just that in older times their propaganda was more timid, due to expected social reactions. They lost all self-control and timidity by the 3rd wave, now they are totally uncontrolled and you see the result. But don't be misled: the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848 clearly spells out the misandry that is to come.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:39 AM
2

I think men are more than half of the victims because 43% are proven but men vastly underreport. Among others, the laws practically ban them from reporting: if police come out, the man gets automatically arrested, regardless of the circumstances and with that police report he know he will lose everything in a divorce, so he doesn't dare to report.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:36 AM
1

It is called "gynocentrism" and it is millenia old.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:33 AM
2

The Dark Triad is the perfect summary of feminism.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:14 AM
1

Because they know long before the wedding that they will divorce the man later, in order to take his house, money, children, everything. The divorce day is the "cash out day". Planned in advance, a financial transaction. Not all women, only most.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:09 AM
1

This kind of lumping trivial stuff with things like rape is one of the standard methods of "feminist scholars". This is how they "prove" that "1 in 3 women are raped" and all the other absurdities the media plays up all the time. All without any basis, evidence or proof.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:06 AM
2

He wouldn't have gotten away if he killed 3 Chinese women.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:59 AM
23

She claims she fired Baldwani. So much about who controlled whom. She was the founder and CEO, too.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:52 AM
2

You are right, this is the most important human rights issue of our time but there is an all-powerful state- and government-supported machinery designed to perpetuate this state of affairs: the feminist regime that controls the US but also much of the world. As long as that is in control I don't think change will happen.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:39 AM
1

And if a man committed something cruel against a woman, he would be praised as a "strong, independent man" and would get broad societal support. A woman daring to do such a thing to a man, on the other hand, would be viciously persecuted and punished. Women kicked in their genitalia, or women being beaten up or killed by a man, in large numbers, in the media or in real life, would be generally considered funny and the acts "empowering" for the man. Women who complained about their mistreatment a…
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:24 AM
3

So true. Add it to the main post's text.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:11 AM
1

Not that they give shit about where and about what men feel comfortable. Men's spaces are constantly banned and shut down by feminists. There are all this "lady fitness" and lady this and that, but male only clubs or anything are all banned. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:08 AM
2

Julie Binder is a notorious femino-fascist. Never read or hear anything from this horrible person.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:47 AM
1

Because feminism is fascism.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:45 AM
1

Absolutely. The father has to agree in writing. Doesn't agree = no abortion. If in return he is required to take care of the child himself, I could find it OK, even though not fair.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:45 AM
1

IPC 498A
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:37 AM
1

Spain and India are two of the worst.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:35 AM
1

YES
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:34 AM
2

Feminist = racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:26 AM
1

Unbelievable. So heavy sentences for women are not justified EVEN THOUGH EVERYBODY, INCLUDING THE CPS KNOW THAT MOHTERS KILL THERE CHILDREN MUCH MORE OFTEN THAN FATHERS. But when it comes to men, "such an effect is justified". "Equal justice under the law", right? The Western world died the day this kind of legislation / public policy was first carried out (probably somewhen in the 60s).
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:24 AM
1

Yet, even the biggest companies are under immense pressure to regularly "virtue signal". So Gillette tried to virtue signal, at the expense of its own customers. That company deserves to be driven out of business by boycotts.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:20 AM
2

Good idea, any idea that is more than nothing could only help. But also be aware of the vicious persecution the participants in the action would get. It is probably better done anonymously. Because we live in that kind of times. You fear for your life, your existence, your reputation, your income and everything else if you dare to cross the regime.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:54 AM
2

Yes, Valerie Solanas was one of the most genocidal / gendercidal radical feminists who actually demanded the complete extermination of all men and boys. In other words, a fascist many many times that of Adolf Hitler. In particular 1 Solanas = 666 Adolf Hitlers today. (Because Hitler had some 6 million victims, Solanas would have about 4 billion, do the math.) Solanas was also the woman who shot Andy Warhol (and crippled him for life). As a "thank you" because Warhol was trying to get some play S…
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:51 AM
3

This Arwa Mahdawi woman is absolutely shameless, together with her publication, The Guardian. This is not the first time from her.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:33 AM
9

Could it be that men are just afraid to be here? Think of what happened to the MGTOW / MGTOW 2 subreddits and many others that were men's issues oriented. The way reddit behaves is intimidating, censoring and oppressive. I am not surprised at all.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:30 AM
0

Routine stuff. Happens all the time. Just one drop in the bucket.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:23 AM
3

This is why feminism is so dangerous. Women, influenced by feminism, simply give themselves the liberty to kill men or boys, no matter how brutally and with how much torture, simply because they "felt" something (as in "I felt unsafe" - note is is not "was unsafe, just "felt"), or because they "heard" something from somebody else (mostly another female) or "believed" something, of course without checking anything. I am seriously afraid for my life these days, by reading these stories. What if I …
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:20 AM
4

India is one of the worst, if not THE worst feminist regimes on the planet. I don't know when, how and by what means will this change but change it must.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:00 AM
68

Feminists hate the truth because they know it is not on their side. So stating it is a thought crime, as in "sexist", "misogynist", "incel", "right wing extremist" etc. etc. etc., all of which have come to be nothing else then the synonyms of "a person telling the truth that by its nature always contradicts the feminist edifice whose foundations are all lies and fabrications". They are afraid of the truth. They are afraid that one day the truth will be out. Hence their incessant, relentless atta…
/r/MensRights29/08/21 05:58 AM
0

Of course you are, and of course I know that. I just took the word of the New Zealand bro. But I know about Australia, it is one of the most miserable and pathetic feminist hell-holes in the world. Your Bettina Arndt is a national treasure! You can be proud of her, at least. The way these things work is that all the most horrible, bad, bad ideas start in the US, and then spread, like wildfires, to the rest of the world. American feminists are the first and the worst. The most extremist, the most…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:41 AM
1

While not formally written as a not allowed, and while you can find examples, for the vast majority of women, they were told they are not allowed to go to medical school and most schools didn't admit them. Do you have ANY evidence or data for any of this? Until and unless you do, this is a complete lie and fabrication. Just FIY, coming with some unhinged political feminist rant is NOT evidence or proof. All these bad faith argumentation attempts to lie and falsify history, like saying "while (on…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:24 AM
1

They have been waging a vicious campaign of lies and frauds against men from day one. But they are getting so extremist, blatant and shameless that they want to constantly pump up their fictitious numbers higher and higher all the time. So they constantly broaden their made-up fake charges to absurdity. By now simply looking at a woman or walking down the same street in the same direction is "sexual harassment" as soon as a woman says so. Just because she doesn't like a particular man or his opi…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:01 AM
1

You are so right. I am from Europe myself even though I now live in the US. I don't get it, either, this new form of fascism is allowed by men to spread like a cancer worldwide and metastasize. I am desperate for an explanation. I am so desperate, as a matter of fact, that I started to blame (Western, developed country-born) men themselves. How can men be THIS stupid? There is no need for all this endless suffering, all this discrimination against men and all this oppression of men. Yes, they ju…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:43 AM
1

Just ignore those morons. More power to you, bro. We have your back.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:14 AM
1

No worries. Not your fault. On the other hand I really have to applaud you for being so aware of what's going on despite you young age. We need more boys and young men like you! Keep up the good work. We'll always be here for you unless this subreddit gets banned, too, like MGTOW. Then we'll find another home.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:12 AM
1

That's what I thought!
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:06 AM
2

Good to know. More power to New Zealand. It definitely is the exception. I wrote from the US perspective.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:44 AM
2

Complete denial in the media. This age will go down in history books as the age of lies. In reality men and boys are the primary targets of massacres, forced conscription and rape. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p6h1ka/in_another_example_of_why_killallmen_isnt/h9df3g8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:42 AM
1

100 men died. Media: <never mentions the whole thing>
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:12 AM
2

Just signed.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:01 AM
2

Yes. Absolutely. It is an edifice whose foundations are frauds and lies. When I find a little time I will add more details. Not that you haven't provided enough already but there are so many more.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:59 AM
9

Here: MAINSTREAM = FEMINIST Got it?
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:52 AM
4

Among others, in modern Western societies ONLY women have reproductive and parental rights. A woman can make a man a father against his will by paternity fraud (punctured condoms, lying about being on the pill, sperm theft, or just by naming a man as the father of a child who is not his), without any consequences or any right of the man to object, but then a woman can also abort a baby any times she pleases and the father has no say in that either. A woman can easily take away a man's children f…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:50 AM
79

Are MRAs so attracted to "femininity"? Could somebody enlighten me what this cartoon is about? There are, among others, gay MRAs. I am not sure I get the point. Probably just me.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:41 AM
3

I wish I was a British citizen. I would sign instantly. You British dudes go! More power to you.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:38 AM
1

All experience with police women clearly shows that there should be no women in the police because they abuse their power against men.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:35 AM
1

Single gender education is the best. Feminists almost completely destroyed single gender education because boys were too successful when they were in their own group. Feminist don't want to leave men alone in their own company. They want to ban all spaces for men, online or offline, because they want to keep men under female supervision at all times. The goal to control and exploit them.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:31 AM
1

So true. The world has always been gynocentric but women weren't as free as today to act out their inborn misandry because they were more dependent on the support of men. Now they can go totally hysterical with impunity, with the full support of the state. What we are waking up to is the realization of what a world ruled by women looks like. And these are still early days. Who knows what horrors are yet to come.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:25 AM
1

Don't hold your breath. The currently ruling feminist regime does and will do everything in its power to prevent that. Just look at the media, entertainment, advertising, legislation, court system (especially family law), this is a totally misandrist regime, and it won't change on its own.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:21 AM
2

In India the laws are sure pretty biased. AGAINT men, and FOR women. IPC (Indian Penal Code) 498a, anyone? Just one of the many insane feminist laws in India. India has probably the most brutal feminist legal system in the world. It is absolutely horrible what is done to men there.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:18 AM
1

Spain is terrible. One of the worst feminist regimes in the world. No idea why, they used to be conservative and Catholic.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:14 AM
3

"we had to go from the 1950s (women not allowed to go to medical school)" Whoa...? What are you talking about? The first woman to enroll in a medical school in the US did so in 1847 and graduated in 1850. "1847 Elizabeth Blackwell is the first woman to enroll in a U.S. medical school. She enters the Geneva (NY) Medical College and graduates in 1850." https://jcsw.hms.harvard.edu/history It's EIGHTEEN HUNDRED forty seven not nineteen hundred. People really should talk about things publicly that t…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:09 AM
2

The girls don't "figure it out". They are TAUGHT that they "are better". Boys are, on the other hand, not only not taught anything but kept in the dark and deceived as long as possible. But eventually they figure it out.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:57 AM
2

There never is a strong and independent woman in family court. Or when a disaster strikes. Or when real work needs to be done, not "managing" and BSing. They are so strong, brave and independent only when the state / government keeps men down for them, discriminates against men for them, oppresses men for them and jails men for them. Then they are strong and independent. Such an old and tired story.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:53 AM
2

There is nothing he can do, accept it already Fast-Mongoose-4989. You pestering him further just makes it only worse for him. Yes, this is the rotten system feminists forced on this society. If you want to be helpful, form a group or something and start campaigning against the mistreatment of male students and against female privileges on campuses.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:37 AM
3

And don't forget WHO practices cancel culture. Not MRAs and not men in general. Only one political force and movement and only one gender uses this kind of mob justice to destroy dissenters.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:28 AM
2

The discrimination against boys in the school system has been going on for at least 30 years. Didn't start yesterday. A whole generation of traumatized young men has grown up in the meantime. I truly hope that this younger generation of men will not keep its mouth shut when they are mistreated in the workplace, in the courts, in the media and everywhere. If we will see dramatic growth in MGTOW / herbivore men in the hear future, which can be measured by drops in marriage rates and in men refusin…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:24 AM
3

And if someone has a problem when I say "All feminists are fascists" then I am talking about THEM. This abjectly brutal, cruel and lowlife assault on innocent people in the title that they give themselves permission to commit proves what depraved fascist they are. This society won't breathe free until the woke and feminist regime that currently rules is taken out of power.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:10 AM
15

Let's face it, men and boys are sexually molested, harassed, assaulted and raped A LOT, by all statistics that have not been blocked by feminists from publications. Yes, men and boys are the least protected from perpetrators, even though we might be the most harassed of all.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:04 AM
1

OK, I must have misunderstood. So I deleted this comment that was made in error. Apologies, wasn't intentional.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:59 AM
1

Meanwhile I questioned if this "black pill" thing is even an existing phenomenon, or just a feminist-invented shaming and propaganda word. My view, could be wrong. Give me links. But I strongly feel that "black pill men" actually don't exist, they are just figments of feminist propagandists' imaginations. Invented as a shaming weapon. So while you argue that "black pill is stupid", meaning men who are "black pill" think or believe stupid things, I would leant towards more to "I don't believe for…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 09:17 AM
1

No, we don't disagree about anything here. I, being a MGTOW myself, just am in the habit of trying to correct notions and comments that could be seen as misrepresentations of MGTOW. Calling them "technically could be black pill" just disagrees with me because "black pill" is a major negative connotation (the term was invented exactly to be used as a weapon of shaming) and MGTOW is not like that, not even technically. It wishes nothing bad on women, so it is not misogynistic (like "black pill" in…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 08:26 AM
0

There are medications for your condition.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:53 AM
1

You are so right. Nothing justifies the hatred of MGTOW - by their very nature MGTOWs are completely safe from all things feminists like to complain about all the time - rape, sexual harassment, violence, whatnot. The most peaceful and harmless men. The elementary gut hatred for MGTOW comes form one source: feminists, and women in general, sense the danger that A MAN WHO DOESN'T DEAL WITH WOMEN CANNOT BE CONTROLLED BY THEM AND CANNOT BE USED LIKE A WALKING ATM BY THEM. And since, to them, those …
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:29 AM
2

Best answer in a long time.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:18 AM
1

Your situation does exist, but your reaction to it is pathetic, I am sorry bro, you should grow up and find higher purposes and more dignified goals for your life than "pussy". You are not an animal in heat, for crying out loud.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:17 AM
1

Men should NEVER contemplate suicide because of women. Why is pussy so important to you guys that it so above everything else? Can't you find a higher purpose in life than "pussy"? That's exactly what MGTOW is about. A man living a life for a higher purpose and for more dignified things than "pussy". Besides, you can look overseas. Moreover, there are professionals. They don't care how tall you are, only about the money. Casual sex, including with prostitutes, is OK with MGTOW. Only commitment t…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:13 AM
1

I just don't see why it would. There are a lot shorter women than that who still will have to loop up to you. My wife is 4 - 11. I think you just lost confidence because the media manipulated you to lose confidence. I think you could look for a partner in more traditional and less media (social and broadcast) saturated locales. Think overseas, too. If a woman rejects you because she is media-manipulated, too, then she is so shallow that you are better off without somebody like that.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:59 AM
1

Unless it is just a feminist-invented shaming word, used to shame you on the media all the time, and in the end you internalized it. A possibility. A lifetime of feminist-controlled media consumption will do that to you.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:54 AM
1

"black pilled men really make me sad". Really? That's soooo sad. Meanwhile I think that phrases like "incel" and "black pill" are feminist-invented man-shaming words and phrases. They are weaponizable and are used to blame and shame men - the only thing feminism actually does. It is along the lines of "man-spreading", "man-splaying", not to mention bogey men like "patriarchy". These things don't exist, there is not one comma of evidence for their existence, outside deranged political feminist ra…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:50 AM
1

"MGTOW can technically be black-pill" No, I disagree with that. That's just defaming MGTOW. To me, this is the typical (and most likely intentional) misunderstanding and misrepresentation of MGTOW. MGTOW is an intentional and chosen lifestyle, not a political philosophy about changing the world. Unlike Men's Rights. It is actually about ACCEPTING the world as it is, knowing that this society is a feminist (and wokeist) regime that is unlikely to change soon. It is accepting instead of fighting. …
/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:22 AM
5

No. You lie. "since men earn much more than women on average" Under 30, women earn more because they are better educated and have more college degree, due to educational and college admission discrimination against boys and men. In older age groups, if you are coming with the "gender pay get" myth, debunked over and over, then here is the reality for you: Men work far more hours than women a year, on average. Something like 6 weeks or more per year. That's the number one reason men make more mon…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 05:56 AM
1

No, he doesn't seem to be projecting. He seems to be telling the truth.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 05:15 AM
3

And the second part is as true as the first.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 05:14 AM
4

Excellent analysis. Every word is true.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 05:13 AM
3

You go, bro. More power to you. I corrected this QirkyEdge4428 moron for you, together with other Redditor responder brothers. You da man, brother, keep up the good work. Never have any fear of assholes like this idiot because we, your brothers, have your back, and we will always be there for you.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 04:58 AM
3

Yet another unhinged delusional feminist extremist polluting the Men's Rights subreddit. So listen, let's start this with your main delusion, this "men run everything" idiocy. You know, how men are the ruling class. You idiot. If that were true, why would men be 95% of the homeless, why would we have 2000+ women-only shelters for that 5% and exactly zero (0) men-only shelters for the 95%, why would men be 94% of all workplace fatalities, 80% of suicides, boys struggling in your girl-focused and …
/r/MensRights23/08/21 04:50 AM
2

What's interesting is that starting a sentence with "Kill all ..." and ending it with any other group than "men", such as "Jews" or "blacks" or "women" or "gays", I dunno, somehow just nobody seems to buy it that "you know, this was supposed to be a joke", or "sarcasm" or "funny", or "as in ha ha ha". ONLY men can be put at the end of that sentence and then stand there with that idiotic grin and claim that this is just soooo innocent, because you know, ha ha ha. That I want to exterminate your w…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 02:46 AM
1

A direct call for genocide / gendercide. That's why I say: feminism = fascism. Exhibit A: SCUM Manifesto.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 02:35 AM
1

Thanks, I appreciate it. Something is wrong with my computer. It first showed nothing and now blue filled circles. Probably I just need to reboot.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:40 AM
11

"Every six month"? 21 years passed with 12 "attacks". It is almost like 1 in every two years (a little under two years). And you are right, 12 attacks out of a male population of 165 million men ... it is 6 millionth of a percent ...
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:19 AM
14

Just as saying "kill all men" and "all men are trash" are retardation. It didn't start yesterday.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:12 AM
99

Feminists truly do love the SCUM Manifesto: https://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/07/29/scum-manifesto-perfect-summer-vacay-read/
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:08 AM
10

The ultimate in demonization. The next step is logically unavoidable: if it is a terrorism threat, eliminate it. That means there could come a day, when the "charge" of being an "incel" might carry the ultimate sentence, to once and all eliminate a terrorist threat: the death penalty or something like life in prison. And then, most likely, the determination of who is an "incel" will be carried out on a purely political basis. The word "incel" is likely to eventually morph into "everybody who dar…
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:03 AM
1

My math says that women and children together were 19.5% of the total. So slightly more than 80% of the dead were men. In my fantasy "press'" and "media" it would have been reported as "More than 1,500 died, over 80% of them men (together with 99 children and 194 women)." Because, you see, when you count deaths, you start with the largest group. If you want to be fair. This will never happen here, where it is practically a taboo to mention men and boys at all when something bad happens with many…
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:27 AM
4

True. That's exactly the reason why women have always been protected, kept safe - together with their children -, got supported and provided by men all through history. This is also the reason why wars were always fought by men. You can lose half of your male population and it won't become a reproductionary bottleneck. That's why there are no all-female armies. Lose half of your uteruses and you'll go extinct in one generation under pressure from normally reproducing groups. Nowadays, however, f…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 08:39 PM
1

"can’t cope with the facts." What facts? Do you have any facts? - especially ones that are related an any way to the topic of how many men are raped a year in US? How many women "attempt" suicide has absolutely nothing to do with how many men are raped in the US. The short answer is that a large number of female "suicide attempts" are nothing of the sort. Women cut themselves with superficial cuts (men do it, too) and then later try to sell those as "I attempted suicide" (the part men don't do).…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 05:15 AM
1

Absolutely. I am fully aware of the false data fabricating methods of "feminist scholars". One very common such method is that they "measure" something (like you said, say, regret or other negative feelings about sex) and then they label it and publish it, and headline it as something TOTALLY DIFFERENT. Yours is a classic example, regret about consensual sex later, for totally external and trivial reasons, such "OMG, my mom will find it out, what will she say?" (this actually happened), or "OMG,…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:26 AM
4

You are absolutely right, CellMajor. MercuysonofJuptier is distorting what MGTOW is and means. Nobody cuts off anybody, including women. We just don't marry them, don't cohabitate with them, don't long term date them, and don't recreate with them, for completely logical, reasonable, and above all, practical reasons. This doesn't mean that women are "cut off". How is not, say, marrying somebody means cutting this person off? If you are a straight man, you don't marry any men, nor have children wi…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:00 AM
1

I tell you why. Every single word I wrote is true, and I did, and can at any time, completely rebut any of your false claims. I just decided that this is not the right place and time for it. I won't allow myself to be dragged into some of sort shouting match with a feminist right here and right now. Simply because that antagonizes people emotionally, and with this issue, about the distortion, lying and truth- and data-suppressing that is happening about the issue of the rape and sexual violation…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:47 AM
1

I agree with any reasonable form of population reduction. So tying off men's tubes is an equally effective way. Both should be done, on a voluntary basis, in exact equal numbers, to preserve equality, that cherished goal of feminism (at least on paper). Nonetheless, this has nothing to do with the fact that there is absolutely no "extra inherent value" in either gender. Full stop. But I under no circumstances would allow the tying of anybody's tubes as early as 11-16, or even more abhorrently, 5…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:32 AM
2

This doesn't make sense. Why exactly does every person have twice as many female ancestors than male? A baby needs both the mother's DNS and the father's DNA. There is no baby from just one. We are a sexually reproducing species, there is no parthenogenesis for humans. So, I have two (2) parents, one male one female. Then four (4) grandparents, two of them male and two of them female. Follow this for any number of generations. The numbers double in each previous generation but the ratio of the e…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:16 AM
1

It shows, however, that boys and young men are targeted for rape with the same, or more, vehemence as girls and women. It is especially surprising in a deeply Muslim society, given the Islamic taboo about male homosexuality. In those societies women are often very closely guarded and their rape is equally taboo. That makes the boys so vulnerable as substitutes for girls. The taboo against the rape of girls or women just doesn't apply to them, so they are fair prey. For more on male rape victimiz…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:37 AM
1

I fully agree, Not all women have the uterus-entitlement complex. Just many. The entitled ones, especially feminist ones do have it. The uterus-entitlement complex is part of the ideology called "feminism". That's what I target.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:31 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 10:29 AM
1

Such is life. Sadly.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 10:29 AM
2

Men live 6 years shorter lives than women, for purely societal reasons. Biology has nothing to do with it, up until 1840 men and women in the US had the exact same life expectancy. Biology hasn't changed since 1840. To maintain this difference of 6 years in life expectancy, more than 400,000 men and boys need to die early and preventable deaths every year than women. Over about 15 years that's about 6 million. The number of Hitler's victims. Feminist mass murder is everywhere where feminists are…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 10:25 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 10:18 AM
7

In case you missed it ... there were many Allied programs for the schooling of girls. One of them, Malala Yousafzai, even got a Nobel Peace Prize for being one of them. In contrast, the Allies instituted exactly none, zero, nil, zilch programs for the education of boys. Some people pointed this out and were quickly shouted down. Just that you know, before making even more demands of what the Allies should have done for the education of girls in Afghanistan. It is such typical feminist insensitiv…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 10:13 AM
1

Bacha bazi is the name of the practice of using "dancing boys", i.e. young boys or male youth dressed as girls and dancing for adult men. They are often raped, as it is easy to guess. The Taliban bans the practice under the threat of the death penalty. Bacha bazi, however, is centuries old, and hard to repress. The Wikipedia article gives interesting information about the practice, including how it was often intentionally ignored by American troops, and Afghan "allies" were surprised by American…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:56 AM
1

Go, bro, you DA MAN.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:38 AM
5

Look ... somehow it is hard to overlook the woman's clearly communicated wishes for certain forms of rough sex. It is not that Bauer just jumped out of a bush and attacked the woman who was a complete stranger. Er ... not quite. So you reducing it to ""Some men are pieces of shit and some women are just victims." is just plain illogical. Maybe "some men are pieces of shit" - but not necessarily this one. As the judge said, he always respected and followed what the woman told him she wanted. Mayb…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:34 AM
-4

Yet, I am afraid you will get your "other woman" soon, in the form of Kamala Harris. Let's pray it won't happen.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:22 AM
16

Very true.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:21 AM
4

A particularly aggressive anti-MRA article. The events are quite old, soon after this it did turn out that Den Hollander shot Marc Angelucci, too. But overall the whole incident is used by USA Today simply as an exercise to recycle and reiterate old false tropes about the MRA movement (misogynist, sexist, racist, right wing extremist, white supremacist, hate group, you name it). Defamation, denigration, demonization. The "three D's of the feminist method. No "news" article worth its salt can go …
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:13 AM
1

Thank you for sharing this. Very important information.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:10 AM
1

Only Fox New would dare to use the words "woman" and "rape" in a HEADLINE, with the women being meant as the rapist. Woke media: never, ever, ever. NO "R" WORD FOR WOMEN, EVER. We are woke, you see. Get out of here with that stupid "truth" thing of yours!
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:01 AM
7

Bros, the answer to all is this: don't have any interactions with women outside casual sex if you cannot live without it. In short, go MGTOW, MGTOW, MGTOW. Do it before it is too late, and you will be very, very grateful to yourself. I am so sorry for the OP and all other men who didn't go MGTOW in time. Try to recover the best you can, and go MGTOW immediately, for the future.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:55 AM
5

The media's confabulation about women is fabulous. When a woman commits a crime, they never mention the gender in the headlines. They mention ONLY women in the headlines when something bad happens, and there are victims, as if men didn't exist. When an adult woman rapes an underage minor, the "r" word is never used about women by the media. She "had sex" or "had a relationship" with the victim. Or even that the minor "seduced" the female teacher. In many cases the underage male victim of statuto…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:29 AM
3

There are more videos like that on YT and elsewhere. Very well known, completely maladaptive dysfunction in modern society. But it is worth repeating time and time again. Not everybody heard it. (Hopefully, yet.)
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:10 AM
29

I am sorry, but you have internalized the biggest con job in history. "There is a reason why women tend to be more valued and catered for, its due to their biological importance in comparison to the men." No, this is simply not true but this is what they want you to believe. Don't. A man's life is not one red cent less valuable than a woman's life, and a man is not one comma less necessary to create new life than a woman. With apologies, I have to repeat what I wrote about this in another post (…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:04 AM
8

The self-inflation women do is that they self-delude themselves in the belief system that somehow some specific organs, such as a uterus or vagina give them some sort of undefined "inherent value" that men don't have. Several things are wrong with this. (1) Goats, sheep, cows, all mammals give births the same way, not big deal whatsoever. The uterus is a delivery mechanism, Mother Nature took care of that, in an automated fashion, long before humans even appeared on the planet. Making a big hyst…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:54 AM
23

Standard feminist procedures. Weaponize every incident you can find, no matter how fake, to defame and demonize men. And if you can't find an incident ... because in reality men don't behave that way, then ... well, fabricate one. Works 100% of the time.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:30 AM
7

Trudeau is such a pathetic slave of the wokeists and feminists that it brings shame to Canada. Sorry, Canada. You deserve better.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:24 AM
1

Sorry, I sometimes get carried away in the heat of the moment. Will try to watch it better. We always learn.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:22 AM
3

Men still run everything in society You know as much as everybody else that this simply not true in a modern Western society. The unbearable social condition of men and boys in these societies shows up clearly in the statistics about homelessness, work deaths, victimization by violent crimes, suicides, dying 6 years younger, denied reproductive rights for men, denied parental rights for men, the denial of a decent education to boys, low college participation ratesamong males, drug and alcohol ov…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:21 AM
2

proof is mandatory to dispense justice but lack of proof does not mean the accuser is wrong. True. But it does mean that the accused is innocent in the eyes of the law. Until new evidence comes in. And this sacrosanct principle of the presumption of innocence is being trampled on ceaselessly day and night in this society, especially when it comes to the treatment of men.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 05:33 AM
3

First, you should re-read the post. There was no nefariously calculated number of times a man was raped, just an assumption to fill in an asterisk (*) that the CDC published instead of a number. Moreover not all prison rapes are male on male, especially in juvenile facilities with women guards. Finally, no, the claim wasn't that all those men were raped by women (although the majority were). It only said that "more men are raped than women", without saying by whom. The articles at the end "Sexua…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 12:39 AM
1

You are right, wrong column. I take back the 400,000 per year. But even if we just say zero for 12 months, the number for men is sill higher at 1,467,000 to the women's 1,270,000. The men are still 200,000 higher (the prison number is 216,000 not just 200.000). But taking zero for 12 months for men's forcible penetration is also completely unrealistic. You are correct that the male 400,000 victims as year cannot be derived from the 970,000 lifetime number. The whole confusion arises from the fac…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 12:09 AM
2

Sorry to hear, bro, must have been horrible. It is a deep trauma, you need to find a way to heal.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:49 PM
1

More than 60% of gun deaths in the US are suicides, mostly by men. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/16/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/ So firearms are not the main source of violence. It includes so much else, like hitting, throwing things, use of other weapons like knives, pinning somebody down etc. In many of those cases men have a physical advantage. But it is less and less as more and more technology penetrates society. And violent crime has been going down for d…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:46 PM
3

Not the case. New research sheds light on the perpetrators, too. The vast majority of the perpetrators of rape and sexual assault on boys and men are women. That's why articles like "Sexual Victimization by Women Is More Common Than Previously Known" and "The Understudied Female Sexual Predator" are attached, which discuss perpetrator numbers. I recommend reading them for information about perpetrators.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:41 PM
1

True. Math corrected. If we allow that out of the 970,000 completed penetration rapes, all men are raped at least 2 to 3 times (not 5 times), we get about 400,000 victims of completed force rape cases, for a total of 1,267,000 + 400,000 = 1,667,000. Since they did NOT report (I think because the did not DARE to report) estimates of how many actual victims were there for the 970,000 forced penetrations of boys and men, we have to make an estimate of how how many times each was raped, repeatedly. …
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:59 PM
1

"Imagine having to step up to your aggressor and being jailed for having a bad lawyer or some other random bullshit." Imagine having to step up to your false accuser with no lawyer at all. Which is the case in most college sexual attack investigation panels. "Imagine having to step up to your aggressor and being jailed for having a bad lawyer or some other random bullshit." Which is the case for MEN AS WELL, in huge numbers divorce cases and in cases when the man was the victim of domestic viole…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:55 PM
2

No. The vast majority of perpetrators of rape and sexual assault against boys and men are women. New research sheds light on this. That's why I added articles like "Sexual Victimization by Women Is More Common Than Previously Known" and "The Understudied Female Sexual Predator", etc. to my post. Read those articles for a starter.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:51 PM
1

Whoever commits murder and self-identifies as an outcast with an ideology or manifesto as the reason for the murder is mentally ill. Sane, mature adults don't do such a thing. So what you say doesn't apply to "men" in general, only to mentally sick ones. Secondly, yes, men commit far more violent crimes than women. Simply because they CAN: they are generally bigger and stronger than women. This however, absolutely doesn't prove that they are inherently, psychologically more aggressive. They are …
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:42 PM
5

You are very right that current "methods" used to measure rape and sexual violence, as developed and used by feminist "scholars", are highly fraudulent and are so intentionally, by design. They are developed to confirm pre-determined political outcomes, not to reveal any actual truth. Abject absurdities like "1 in 3 women are raped" are fabricated exactly this way. Regrettably, the media splashes those absurdities all over their headlines (because the managers, editors and "journalists" are all …
/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:57 PM
1

That's why there are some articles ("Sexual Victimization by Women Is More Common Than Previously Known", "The Understudied Female Sexual Predator" etc.) because new studies shed light on this issue. Generally, the large majority of rapists of men or boys are female. Far more than previously "thought". Not really "thought", IMHO, rather "assumed for political convenience". (Meaning the political convenience of the feminists movement.) So there are new studies about the perpetrators, too, and the…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:35 PM
12

Maybe ublicizing this more and spreading awareness. Just my first thought. Could be wrong.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:28 PM
4

My humble take. Let's start a committee to run a collection drive. However, its goal shouldn't be stated as "shut toxic women up for once and all" because people have reading comprehension issues when it comes to genders, like those who downvoted you. They read " shut women up" and not "shut toxic women up", and get in a rage. Even though "toxic woman" is clearly meant by you as a synonym for "misandrist". Even the term "toxic women" triggers a rage in feminists because they are used to the word…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:24 PM
3

In reality, feminists view man and boys as subhuman. I mentioned this on Reddit before. Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m3wooz/washington_post_reveals_boys_and_men_are_viewed/
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:00 AM
1

Because incels rent cars and mow over people. In huge numbers, all the time. Are you really this delusional? And, BTW, feminists are very violent. All statistics show it, among others that domestic violence is the highest in case of lesbian couples, straight couples are in the middle and gay men couples have the lowest level of violence. Women in general are much more violent than men. Women start 70% or more of all domestic physical violence. It is just that men can be more deadly when they are…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:49 AM
1

I think you missed Rule 1, AGAIN, man. I am more than twenty years married, man. To a woman, man. It is unbelievable, how, purely out of hurt pride, because you are shown to be wrong, you dare to take the liberty to call me names, WITHOUT KNOWING ANYTHING ABOUT ME, MY AGE, MY MARITAL STATUS, MY EDUCATION. (Ph. D. of Mathematics and Computer Science, by the way.) or anything else. You don't even know what country I am from or what my gender is (at least not for sure.) What is fascist is feminism,…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:36 AM
0

"it says"? What is "it"? Feminists fabricate fake "studies" like "one in three women are raped" and such nonsense. Not one comma of it is true, totally fabricated and manufactured. I have the numbers and the data for that, too. The data above clearly shows that more men than women are raped a year in the US if you count "made to penetrate" as rape (which it is) and prison rapes. That's the truth even if you don't like. It really doesn't matter whether you like it or not. It is simply the truith.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:04 AM
2

Gladly. So first, the definition of rape. In the past, rape was defined to allow only women as victims, by definition. (Something about the "carnal knowledge of the female body". The "carnal knowledge of the male body" was never mentioned.) So here I go by Rape is forcing someone to have sexual intercourse with someone else they don't want to have intercourse with. This is gender-neutral and so it is fair. So 2010 was the first year the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), after pre…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:44 AM
1

How to figure out an accuser lied? Happens all the time!!! Say, college women accuses college man of "rape". Except that the man has a million text messages about how much she wants to fuck him and specifically, that night sending him texts to come over to her room to fuck. And for the next X months, the same text messages of how much she loves him. 6 months later, she sees him with another woman. All of a sudden, the rape allegation, for that specific night (they fucked like a million other nig…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:02 AM
1

Good to know, today I just furthered my feminist education. Anyway I want BOTH. So here: When an accuser is found to have lied, she or he must automatically get the exact same sentence the accused would have gotten had the accusation been true. AUTOMATICALLY, NO EXCEPTIONS. You know, for equity's sake (as in fairness). And for equality's sake (as in equal rights and obligations). But isn't it great that feminists just have to change the English language all the time, including using high-brow so…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:30 AM
3

How about the outlines of a land whale?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:26 AM
3

I think someone has a speech impediment. They can just repeat the same sentence? No matter what? Or some mental impediment. Looks pretty serious, though. Maybe some fresh air might help.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:24 AM
0

THERE IS NO GENDER PAY GAP. DIFFERENT JOBS ARE PAID DIFFERENTLY, AND FEWER HOURS ARE PAID LESS THAN MORE HOURS. COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY FROM ANY GENDER. Paying less for fewer hours and for easier jobs is a GENERAL, gender-unrelated economic effect that applies to everybody, equally, completely regardless of gender. If a man decides to work fewer hours or to choose an easier but less well paid job, HE WILL BE PAID LESS, TOO. This has nothing to do with gender, get it already. THIS IS NOT A GENDE…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:12 AM
2

They are shameless. Covid - and any other infectious disease - kills and killed far more men than women. Boys and men have weaker immune systems than girls and women. Men get it much easier, get much sicker of it, die a lot more from it then women. Then comes a deluge of media articles with "Covid: women most affected". They are ridiculous. There is a general pattern to these "articles": Bad thing X happens. (X = anything bad: Greek financial crisis, Euro currency crisis, Great Recession, any ep…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:51 AM
3

If you count prison rapes and properly count "made to penetrate" as rape, then more men than women are raped a year in the US than women.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 08:14 AM
11

Then why don't you just go the bloody f*ck away? Back to whatever feminist shithole you crawled out of, whether it's FDS, TwoX, or whatever. Your misandrist, man-hating, enemy-of-men's-rights stupid feminist type is not wanted here, not welcome here, and trolls like you have no business being here. Get it already. Off with you, stupid troll.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 08:08 AM
3

There are radical feminists who claim that "all heterosexual sex is rape". I wonder what would they reply if I said I agree, but the man is the victim in all those cases. Why not? On what basis do they claim that it is automatically the woman who is the victim? The same problem exists when they say "a drunk person cannot consent", so a man having sex with a drunk woman is automatically a rapist. Now wait a minute. When both are drunk (which is the case in the vast majority of the cases) neither …
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:51 AM
7

"Women's organization" as a concept, is today's equivalent of the "Nazi Party", as a concept.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:39 AM
2

Good point. Spelling fixed. (I hope). It is surprisingly hard to type the same word a number of times, especially in all uppercase ... I appreciate the correction. Just a side remark. I don't know what the heck is the difference between "equity" and "equality" but feminists use both words with great vehemence, so I had to use both.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:37 AM
2

Wha ...? WOMEN MAKE THE CHOICES TO WORK FEWER HOURS AND TAKE ONLY COMFORTABLE AND CONVENIENT JOBS EVEN WHEN THOSE PAY LESS. Those are the choices women make. As a result, they make less, as a group. per year. Then they blame men for it in the form of claiming that "there is a gender pay gap", you know, "because of the patriarchy". Even though the whole earnings difference is down to their own choices. Feminism, to me, is a the current form of fascism that literally takes millions of lives, while…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:09 AM
1

Yes, that's the one I was referring to. Thank you so much.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:58 AM
6

Feminists took over the powers of the government doing exactly that: competing about that WOMEN SUFFER MOST. For sixty years, this has been coming out of the faucets 24/7. That was their big claim all along (even though it is a falsehood). That's who they WON. It WORKED. As they proved, COMPETITIONS ABOUT "WHO SUFFERS MOST" WORK. Now that you guys won everything doing just that, you come with this "Are we seriously going to make it a competition about who suffers the most?" crap. Because you are…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:43 AM
14

I added one more item at the bottom.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 05:47 AM
14

And men got the same if they didn't have a beard. Moreover, for a reason a woman gets raped, a man typically gets killed. Unless he is a boy, in which case he gets raped, too, before he gets killed. Under the Taliban the use of young boys, dressed as girls and forced to dance (before getting raped) is a national pastime.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 05:35 AM
4

"as an attack on feminism itself" I cannot imagine a more important task for any decent human being in our time than a continuous, non-stop, all-out, full frontal attack on feminism itself. Feminism is the modern day version of fascism, and at the same time a neo-Marxist and neo-Communist totalitarian ideology. It literally takes millions of lives, it is a set of human rights violations and a set of crimes against humanity. I don't have the space and time right now to go in all details, but ever…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 05:18 AM
1

Just curiosity: what would a logo that demeans women would look like?
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:48 AM
1

Reddit is making itself irrelevant by turning itself into a woke echo chamber. The more it does it, the more people, above all men, will tune out. It will not have an audience beyond the FDS types that are already there. You read it here first. Reddit's days are numbered. It will die with the rest of the woke media. Just nobody will care, I certainly don't already. I don't watch news, I don't watch TV, I don't use social media because all are the same, say the same, all lie the same way, all spr…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:44 AM
48

Routine stuff. When there is an accident or terrorist attack, or war attack and women and girls are victims, they are ALWAYS listed as per their gender: "women" and "girls". Missing or dead men or boys are reported as "people", or "students". Like this "Six women were killed in factory accident" When (typically a much larger number) of men or boys and killed it is reported as "Sixty-five workers died in factory accident". When girls are kidnapped by Boko Haram: "12 girls were kidnapped by Boko H…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:18 AM
30

And do "you guys" know how men were treated at the same time? Do you even care?
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:09 AM
140

In wars, men and boys are systematically killed all the time. Women and girls are often left alone. This is about the Srebrenica massacre of 8000 men and boys: https://www.news18.com/news/world/25-years-ago-srebrenica-massacre-of-8000-muslim-men-boys-wrote-former-yugoslavias-darkest-chapter-2708781.html This is routine, happens all the time. This article: Recognizing Gender-Based Violence against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations does a good job explaining the issue. http://static1.1.…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:54 AM
8

Let's make this clear: WOMEN CAN LEGALLY RAPE BOYS AND MEN WITH IMPUNITY ("men cannot be raped", "only women can be victims", "only men can be perpetrators", "he enjoyed it anyway", "he was just lucky"). WOMEN CAN LEGALLY MURDER BOYS AND MEN WITH IMPUNITY ("he deserved it", "I felt unsafe") Notes: 1 - When it comes to murdering boys, it includes the sons of mothers. Mothers kill their children in 71% of child murder cases, fathers only in 29% of the cases: https://www.breakingthescience.org/Simp…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:04 AM
25

I demand EQUITY and EQUALITY! Here: When an accuser is found to have lied, she or he must automatically get the exact same sentence the accused would have gotten had the accusation been true. AUTOMATICALLY, NO EXCEPTIONS. EQUITY, EQUITY, EQUITY! EQUALITY, EQUALITY, EQUALITY!
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:38 AM
7

Such as the Huffington Post editor: https://www.inc.com/suzanne-lucas/huffpost-editor-says-new-years-resolution-is-to-kill-all-men.html Does this woman looks 14 year old to you: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/femail/video-1398499/Controversial-video-resurfaces-woman-declaring-kill-men.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFdCIqBM6nE Or this Paris City councillor: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8872001/Feminist-author-calls-women-eliminate-men-lives-new-book.html https://www.reddit…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:42 AM
2

Here: Rule 1: A personal attack is automatically null and void in any debate. If that is all you have, stay away so that other people can have an intelligent conversation. This was about the 500th time on Reddit that I got this primitive, unintelligent and cave-man level response of "you need help". This happens because you and your ilk have absolutely NO facts, evidence or logic for your views, for two reasons: (a) your views are completely wrong and are in conflict with reality, and (b) becaus…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:23 AM
1

Agreed, I am done, too. But, I am sorry, but I cannot leave some of your claims here unaddressed because there is so much falsehood in those claims. 1 - "women are literally more likely to die in a car crash than men because safety measures were designed by men" Yes, now that you mentioned it, I read about the test dummy issue. However, the analysis, which is based on an IIHS study: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a35493891/iihs-study-women-risk-crash-injury/ says that the reason why women are…
/r/MensRights17/08/21 05:09 AM
1

Good to know. However, I never heard our "feminist allies" say one word that would question or disagree with feminist dogma or ideology. Feminists often claim that they are for the "equity" or "equality" of the genders and that men and women should have "equal rights". Because women, supposedly, don't have equal rights "because of the patriarchy". But the reality is the exact opposite and I will show you how. Here is the problem: NAME ONE (1) RIGHT MEN HAVE AND WOMEN DON'T (in a modern western s…
/r/MensRights17/08/21 02:26 AM
8

If you stepped foot in ANY feminist subreddit, you would see NOTING ELSE than hate posts. How is it OK for them? But the main point is that yes, in every sufficiently large population there are mentally unstable individuals. But they, and their posts in a subreddit say absolutely nothing about the actual MGTOW philosophy and its followers. The feminist method of banning and closing down any on-line and off-line spaces for men is to find a mentally unstable person and his comments or posts or wha…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 08:37 PM
1

"she’s in Australia where I think the MAXIMUM is level 5 imprisonment for 10 years." And you are very wrong about that. Here: "The maximum penalty for rape is life imprisonment." https://www.awbrisbanelawyers.com.au/rapes-and-sexual-offences/ In the first section called "Rape". And this a website for Australian lawyers. "But in this case my statement stands , if she was in the US I would have looked at it per state, but she’s in a whole different legal system and country." NO, WHERE SHE IS (IN A…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 08:17 PM
1

There. 9 surgeries? Yes, stuntmen have surgeries. Because they have accidents, just like acrobats or other circus performers. But 9 (nine) injuries of professional stuntmen somehow proves anything for you? That's less than 10! In a movie where they performed dozens of stunts. The risk of injury for professional stuntmen is a calculated risk. These stuntmen knew that injuries could happen but the money they got for it made it worth. They probably got hundreds of thousands of dollars for their rol…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 08:42 AM
5

No, your rant isn't even half intellectual. It's wholly stupid. I am sorry. It starts with the complete misunderstanding and misrepresentation of MGTOW as "MGTOW is useless to Men's Rights, it's just bitching about dating." Come again? "Bitching about dating"? MGTOW's very essence is the renunciation of dating, marriage, cohabitation, having children with women - the complete renunciation to deal with women in any shape, size or manner. Or at least, where contact with women is unavoidable, to mi…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 08:15 AM
8

"Some male groups are not fit to be allies in this movement and the MGTOW was one of those groups" Nice defense of the indefensible - the banning of MGTOW by Reddit. "Toxic culture and ideas" - which ones, specifically? Can you spell out? Look, MGTOW men simply want to be left alone and cut off or minimize contact with women. Just like the Japanese "herbivore men", who are just the Japanese MGTOW, essentially. What is "toxic" about this? Exactly by this nature, MGTOW men are completely safe from…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 07:30 AM
9

If those "communities" even exist, of which I am not convinced of at all. Especially "incel" sounds to me like a feminist-invented shaming label, that they use to shame men, in particular those who dare to dissent with, or criticize some false feminist claim or dogma. The moment you tell the truth about feminism or feminists, and their methods, you are instantly one, or more, or all, of the following: "Misogynist": everything critical or questioning about feminists or women is automatically miso…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:47 AM
8

They make full use of any and all excuses to carry out their extermination campaigns of men's spaces, on-line or off-line. Clearly, someone like that is mentally sick. How would a sane adult, fully mature, get the idea that "hey, I cannot get laid, so let me shoot up a bunch of people who have nothing to do with the above mentioned complaint"? "Will THAT get me laid?". It is just that every such incident, instead of being investigated both criminally and psychiatrically, is simply grabbed as yet…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:18 AM
6

Whoever is the moderator, this society has no problem with incitement for extreme violence, as long as it is against men. Look up Valerie Solanas (calls for literally killing all boys and men and the "end of the male sex") or Sally Miller Gearhart (reduce male population to 10%). Numerically, their victims would count in the billions, not Hitler's paltry 6 million. They are the equivalent of 666 and 600 Adolf Hitlers, respectively. Yet, heir books and writings are constantly in publication, and …
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:58 AM
1

Here are the sentencing guidelines by state: https://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/rpt/2003-R-0376.htm Look at the rightmost column. Full of up to 25 years, 30 years, 40 years and even life in prison. Of course, only men get these kinds of harsh sentences. Women get either probation or suspended sentences, or maybe the same numbers as men but in DAYS NOT IN YEARS. Like 30 days. Also, when media report about a woman who raped a male minor, it is worded as she "had sex" or "had a relationship" with the vict…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:08 AM
1

I actually looked up "Jackass" on Wikipedia and it is all fake. The men doing the stunts are professional actors and stuntmen. Here are a few: Philip John Clapp (born March 11, 1971),[2][3] known professionally as Johnny Knoxville, is an American actor, stunt performer, filmmaker, and comedian. Brandon Cole "Bam" Margera[2] (/mɑːrˈdʒɛərə/ mar-JAIR-ə; born September 28, 1979) is an American skateboarder, stunt performer, television personality, and filmmaker. Ryan Matthew Dunn (June 11, 1977 – Ju…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:41 AM
20

Their mocking language is an integral part of their toolset. Since feminists can't and don't argument using facts, evidence and logic, because these three things are not on their side, they are reduced to using ad hominem and personal attacks as "replies". The main types of these attacks are blaming, shaming, banning, canceling and destroying, or as I call them, the BSBCD tactics. Condescending, ridiculing and mocking are a variant of the "S" part: shaming. It is really pathetic, because here is…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:20 AM
7

So true. Today you are practically required to be a misandrist, even if you are a man, just to survive.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:01 AM
11

Most of the men threatening violence are mentally sick people. Feminists just use a bunch of psychiatric cases as weapons to ban men's online spaces. Men in general are nothing like those psychos, but the psychos are a good weapon for the feminists and misandrists.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:58 AM
14

How is "kill all men" not inciting for violence? How come that when feminists / women do the threatening with (extreme) violence, there are no consequences for them and their online spaces? Reddit is making itself increasingly irrelevant with its prostrating-itself-before-feminists-and-wokes acts. Nobody goes to an online community for listening to woke lecturing. As reddit is reducing itself to not much else (like most media these days), the more people, especially men, will tune out. Reddit, y…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:55 AM
20

A known feminist tactic that is used all the time to ban / shut down online or off-line spaces for men is that they wait until a MENTALLY SICK person does something bad, like writes a manifesto to commit a school shooting or similar. They then carry out a "collective guilt" and "guilt by association" media blitz which will result in Reddit or some other media company banning or shutting down men's online or off line spaces even though the men there are COMPLETELY INNOCENT, never did anything wro…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:48 AM
5

A man would have gotten, I don't know, 30 - 35 years in prison for this.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:39 AM
2

The 1 in 6 statistics is probably a vast underestimation of the real numbers. That's because men (and even boys) are constantly brainwashed into "toughing it out", "being a man", "not crying" and that "men cannot be victims, only women can be" and such. Add to it that when it is abuse in a domestic situation, the law effectively bans men from reporting. If police come out, it will be the man arrested, no matter the circumstances, no investigation will be held, he will end up with a criminal reco…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:23 AM
2

I love that line: "most men don't have inherent value". OK, so what is "inherent value" (I want a precise and compact definition here, not BS), and how is it "measured"? But whatever crap word salad feminists come up with, they just called HALF OF HUMANITY VALUELESS. Like the Nazis viewed the Jews. The only difference is scale. Hitler considered about 6 million Jews valueless. Femino-fascist feminists, 4 billion men and boys. That's about 666 Adolf Hitlers (and the number symbolism is valid, too…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 01:17 AM
1

I have no idea what that movie is about. But how many people are shown there? 10? Less than 10. Maybe a dozen? Yeah, so that one movie with its say 10 people explains why hundreds of thousands of men die preventable, unnecessary and early death per year, to maintain the female lead of 6 years in life expectancy. Come on, get serious about this. You simply don't want to admit reality because you have drunk too much feminist Kool-Aid where the reason for everything "bad" is men, even the reason of…
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:49 AM
1

They just banned a few days ago the MGTOW (which was already "quarantined") and the feminist-approved MGTOW 2 subreddits, without any reason given. For this subreddit, it might be just a matter of time. There is a growing concern about it, and potential alternatives are being discussed with urgency.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:40 AM
3

Monster.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 06:28 PM
2

I wish I could. But the reality is that feminists and woke people are soooo furious about men daring to vote with their feet that they hysterically hunt down and shut down any and all online spaces that have anything to do with MGTOW. There used to be a mgtow.com now defunct. Reddit had a MGTOW subreddit then a MGTOW 2 subreddit (after the original was "quarantined") and both were banned just a few days ago with no reason cited. So there are very few places left even for men themselves to talk a…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 05:23 PM
2

Yeah, there are crazy / insane / mentally ill people in any population. But be honest. What do you think is the number of men who die doing buggy flips or similar crazy things, vs. those who die due to the reasons I listed? Do you seriously believe buggy flips explain why men die 6 years younger than women, numbering in the millions? If you do, you are mentally dishonest, and the whole "reckless" business is simply about deflecting from the real causes of high male mortality. For the purpose of …
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:54 PM
3

It would be up to decent women to speak up and to openly fight against those "messing up", in order to regain the trust of men. But they don't do it. The "messing up" people are called feminists and are the enemies of men. But since so few women question, let alone openly condemn and fight feminist injustices done to men, men cannot generally trust women. There are a few exceptions of genuinely decent women but so few that statistically it is a danger to men to open up to, or pretty much just tr…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:50 PM
1

If you are a man, just don't open up to women. Period. Best advice.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:33 PM
1

The biggest shame is that Reddit deleted (censored) this post.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:31 PM
3

That no good deed men do and have always done, including protecting and supporting women, will ever go unpunished. The very persons doing the best things for society, including creating and maintaining the very basic economic foundations, will be declared the enemy and will be ruthlessly hunted down in an ungrateful, insane societal system. IMHO there never has been a more unjust and immoral social systems than this one, and men are the victims of it.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:27 PM
1

So first of all, it is 11 months in "home detention", i.e. staying in the comfort of her home. NOT JAIL. Secondly, so much about what all family courts have as their top dogma: the mother is always the better parent. Far from it, women kill their children more often than men, they are especially prone to kill sons. There is nothing as toxic to a child than a bad or mentally sick mother. Just look at the words of that poor father in this case. It is unbelievable that this near-child murderer just…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:22 PM
4

How stupid these people are. There is no female equivalent of the genius of Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, Johann Sebastian Bach or Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. No female equivalent of a Leonardo da Vince or of a Michelangelo Buonarotti. That men always had the upper hand when it comes to intellectual achievement, especially when it comes to innovativity, creativity and originality is a well documented historical fact. What's going on now is the artificial creation of an APPEARANCE to manufacture an…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:03 PM
1

The Guardian newspaper is the most tragic case and the best proof of "anything feminists touch turns into shit". The Guardian was actually a very good newspaper until 2015. Among other, Glenn Greenwald worked there, who exposed George W Bush's illegal and unconstitutional warrantless wiretapping scheme, as revealed by Edward Snowden. And then "The Change" came. The former male editor in chief was removed and replaced by a female, and feminist, one. Instantly, the until then good newspaper become…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:36 AM
2

"Men are reckless and that's why they die younger than women" is a misandrist propaganda slogan against men and boys. Basically, blame men for their own deaths. No, men die younger than women primarily because They are 95% of the homeless (75% of the registered homeless plus 20% of "rough sleepers" who are essentially all men). When you are homeless for a long time, you die. No social support for men. There are 2000+ women-only homeless shelters - for that 5%. And exactly zero men-only shelters …
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:00 AM
1

Unless you are in a developed Western country where feminists openly say they will abort a male baby but not a female one. The reason why in Asian societies there is a preference for boys is simple. In older times there not being any social system to support old people, parents conceive children as a form of "old age insurance". The idea being that the children will take care of the parents when they are old. This has two consequences: Parents there traditionally had far more children than in th…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:40 AM
2

Except in developed Western countries. Many feminists openly say they will abort a male baby. There was even a TV add during a Super Bowl break where a (female) obstetrician handed a baby over to a mother saying "It's a boy. I am sorry." That was supposed to be ha ha ha. There is no limit to misandry, hatred, prejudice, discrimination and hostility toward men and boys in these countries. Unless you are talking about the natural fact that slightly more boys are naturally born than girls. That has…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:21 AM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:15 AM
1

Very sane thinking. Keep it up.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:14 AM
4

Yeah. The good looking, well off men are caught much younger than 44-55. So they are taken by 44-55. As if this was anything revelatory. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:13 AM
4

Do you have any evidence, whatsoever, for this claim? That women are less likely to receive raises when they ask for them? Just wondering, because I have never before come across such a claim.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:10 AM
3

IMHO, bull. See my comment above about the real reason why men make more per year, which is entirely up to women's own choices and has no "gender pay gap" behind it. If you buy the feminist lie that women are these helpless little innocent and shy things who don't dare to open their mouth loudly and demand things, then you may have never seen typical modern feminist women in any situation, including work situations. They are, on average and with exceptions, the most aggressively demanding people…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:02 AM
1

For crying out loud THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "GENDER PAY GAP". So please don't spread it as if it was an existing thing, even with the best of intentions. The "gender pay gap" is concocted this way. You group all men (say, in a country) together and find the average yearly earnings. You then do the same with women. Then you find that PER YEAR men make more money than women. What this odd way of calculation, instead of the real calculation of comparing men's vs. women's wages FOR THE SAME JOB,…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 08:35 AM
6

Imagine the reaction if a men would do anything similar to a woman. It basically comes down to this: women are increasingly allowed to do anything, no matter how brutal, including murder, rape and sexual harassment to men with ever more complete impunity. Or with minimal, symbolic punishments in case of murder or rape. Generally get off without jail. There is a whole movement dedicated to legislate complete impunity for women if a woman kills a man. Look up Elizabeth Sheehy and her proposal of e…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 08:08 AM
1

Any "rule" is worth only exactly as much as it is enforced of it. Reddit is a classic example. They ruthlessly ban, ban, ban anything that dares to question the feminist narrative, dissents or critical of feminism or of women's general behaviors and habits even in the mildest, slightest manner, because of "misogyny". Which has come to simply mean anything critical of women or feminists or supportive of men's issues. On the other hand, even most extreme, egregious forms of misandry, really brutal…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:33 AM
1

"Should" is the most horribly abused word in the English language. I really hate it when feminists - or just ordinary women - come forward with it, pontificating something like they are some higher authority. NO, THEY ARE NOT. Come again? Why exactly "should" they (always meaning "men") do whatever you demand? Give me a good valid reason. Who decides who "should" do what? You? Or feminists as a group? Who do you think you people are? Just an FYI: without men there are no women anyways.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 04:10 AM
1

What I read was that back in 70s the male to female ratio among teachers was half-half. So same number of both. Then came women administrators who hired only or mostly women as teachers and often found "reasons" to fire male teachers. After a while boys or young men realize that if they get a teacher's degree they won't find work. It is that simple, apparently.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:52 AM
3

"I think there was a good reason for MGTOW getting banned, they were actual mysognists." Now name one subreddit that got banned because they were actual misandrists.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:47 AM
2

I didn't write any single one of those things you put in ALL CAPS, except the fact that I didn't write a single word about myself so calling me "narcissistic" is completely ridiculous. Based on all that, like all caps for sentences I didn't write, I am sorry but I have to think that you are sinking into madness. Hatred induced madness, specifically. I am no longer replying to any of this.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:40 PM
120

Feminism is built on the denial of any form of fairness to men. "Hearing both sides of a story"? The horror! Fairness alert: send out the police, fast, man wanting fairness and hearing both sides! Totally unacceptable!!!
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:12 PM
5

My take: I lived for 30 years in a Communist regime before moving to the United States (which I started regretting in the past few years, seeing what kind of society the US is becoming under woke / feminist tyranny). My parents lived under Nazi occupation and then under Soviet old-school Stalinist rule. I know what totalitarian tyranny looks and feels like. They all (such as Communism, Nazism, Maoism) have one important thing in common: they exercise complete media / information control. Anythin…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:55 PM
-10

Very important information. Should be pinned. Oh, wait ... the moderators of this subreddit are feminists ... Anyway, thank you for posting this important piece of information.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:11 PM
3

Narcissist? Do you even know the meaning of that word? I didn't write one single word about myself. As for your typical feminist trying-to-be-condescending "get professional help" attack line, see Rule number 1 above. You still don't get it, do you? That personal attacks are the pathetic last-ditch method of people who have absolutely no fact, evidence or logic to support their claims, so they lower themselves to personal attacks and name-calling instead. Like you. Soooo pathetic.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:50 PM
2

"You're a horrible human being, always remember your horrible mentality." "Get professional help and I hope you never ever have a daughter, and if you do I hope she hates you just as much as you deserve it." Rule 1 A personal attack as a reply is automatically null and void in any debate. If that is all you have, stay away so that other people can have an intelligent conversation.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:42 PM
2

I think you have SERIOUS reading comprehension issues. There is so much hatred in you, in every ounce of you, that you cannot even read anything that is outside your propaganda texts. What I don't get is what man-hating enemies of men's rights like you are trying to do on this subreddit that is about men's rights (or rather the lack of men's rights). Other than spreading misandrist feminist propaganda and trying to defend the indefensible, of course. You are not welcome here, you should get that…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:36 PM
1

In a normally functioning justice system if the "evidence" is weak or flimsy, you cannot use it. It has to be beyond doubt. Moreover, how do you conclude that this reddit is about "tearing women down" just by asking if "Cuomo tasted his own medicine"? If he is a feminist man / white knight who promoted feminist agendas for his political careerism and expediency, he is tasting his own medicine, but why is saying so "tearing women down"?
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:33 AM
1

As far as I read, about 75% of the counted (registered) homeless are men. These are the ones who ever reached a homeless shelter. But there is another about 20% of the homeless who are called rough sleepers who are not counted or registered because they don't even make it to a shelter and sleep under the sky. These are essentially all men, so put together, about 95% of the homeless are men and about 5% are women. In the US alone there are about 2000+ women-only crisis and homeless shelters. Men …
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:16 AM
3

IMHO this subreddit will be banned, too, sometime soon. Feminists don't tolerate anything and anybody who dares to even remotely question any of their dogmas or the (im-)morality of their views. And since they control Reddit, it is only a question of time, methinks.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:04 AM
2

"i personally don't know much about that sub" If you don't know what you are talking about, maybe the best thing is just to shut up. "if that was a incel sub it's good that they banned them" "Incel" is a feminist-invented hate word that they use to shut down debate. No, MGTOW is not "incel", how can anything that is about leaving anybody else alone and focusing on your own self-development can be "harmful" or "toxic" to anybody? You feminists just want to ban, ban, ban everything and anything th…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:24 AM
9

What a fine example of "toxic masculinity". Even in boys, the horror!
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:52 AM
17

Aren't they bothered, just a little bit, by the fact that women live 6 years longer than men, on average? And men, who die younger are "advantaged" wrt aging? How can people be this crazy? Is this world totally nuts? Pathetic, beyond words.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:51 AM
53

"Incel" is just another man-shaming curse word invented by feminists. It is used to cut off debate when they are losing. Like "yeah, the truth is coming out so let's call this guy who tells the truth an incel, that will do it." Feminists can't and don't argument by facts or evidence or logic because these three things are not on their side. So they shame, blame and personally attack instead. As for "various studies", feminists manufacture "studies". Like "1 in 3 women are raped". Or "how schools…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:36 AM
1

The whole "developed" world is becoming a killing field where women can kill men with impunity. It won't be long before we get there. Every sign points to it.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:13 AM
1

Exactly. There is no need for circumcision. I know, I am uncut. All of Europe is, that's where I am from. Nobody has any issues due to being intact. Quite the opposite, I can't imagine being mutilated. There is no medical or health "reason" for it, it is total bogus. As far as I read, circumcision reduces sensitivity in the area so less pleasure, plus all the risks when things go wrong. Absolutely barbaric. But it is a business. Not just this cosmetic thing but the doctors / rabbis / whoever who…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:10 AM
2

I have already made that decision. I am not playing along any more. I am MGTOW, and as soon as a family obligation ends I will emigrate from the US to a non-Western country. Final decision.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 08:00 PM
3

I presume that means exclusively for women's needs, in particular for their vanity needs. Good to know what boys' bodies are used for.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 07:57 PM
13

Might as well just kill boys and men for their organs and tissues everywhere in their bodies. Especially if "women's health research" needs them. Good going.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 11:33 PM
1

The ultimate of "blame men for everything". Now it is even men who will destroy the world. CNN has gone completely insane. I personally never watch that crap channel, neither the other similar (woke) ones, which is essentially all of them. No TV for me. Here is one reason. One of the many.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 06:29 AM
1

It is unbelievable how un-sportmanly, how contemptible and pathetic American feminists can be. Sore losers doesn't even come close to describe them. Their insanity is now on worldwide display. Good going. What a shame.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 06:25 AM
3

As much as feminists hate it, this fact, that women are at least as physically (and a lot more emotionally) violent as men or more, is becoming well documented. First, find the reference quoted in the move "The Red Pill" that about 43% of domestic physical attacks are committed by women and the victim is the man. Considering how massively men must be underreporting - given that the law practically bars them from reporting, since if the police come out, the man will be arrested, will get a crimin…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 06:13 AM
15

There is a by now a well documented push, primarily by feminist legal scholars, that essentially claims that women shouldn't go to prison at all, under any circumstances, even in case of murder. I am serious. Here: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-prof-makes-bizarre-plea-to-place-battered-women-above-the-law What I am worried about is this scenario to evolve: First, we have "Believe all women". Second, a law is passed that simply gives "battered women" the right to kill their partner…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 05:59 AM
1

It is becoming truly Kafkaesque, truly bizarre, and out of this world absurd what kind world we are forced to live in. If I had read this fifty or so years ago it surely would have been in some apocalypse-themed science fiction novel. Now it's reality. This society is going insane.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 05:10 AM
7

Part of this is that I found that many feminists do believe in "female supremacy", they really consider men inferior to themselves, and consequently they really do think that men are subhuman. I have seen many instances of this. In some cases accidentally revealed e.g. in a newspaper article, writing about sons. Etc. Hence, when confronted and proven wrong by a man, they get furious because how dare an inferior subhuman prove me, the superior, fully human person here, wrong? So to them it is sor…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 04:59 AM
1

What is the definition of "on top"? As for "other issues", I don't know how many times I have said already, shaming language as an "argument" is invalid. Personal attack against facts and evidence is also invalid. Both are null and void.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 03:29 AM
0

The same to you.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 03:26 AM
1

Whatever. Look, I got for about a million times what "your point" is. No need to repeat it again. What I said was only that you are sidetracking a debate that affects millions of men, to some little "your point" thing that maybe applies to a few dozen, or maybe a few hundred cases. To the topic discussed here, "your point" is IRRELEVANT, what takes so long to get? Moreover, "your point" has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOPIC. The topic here is NOT domestic violence. OK? You just got stuck on somebody'…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 03:15 AM
1

How old your first reddit comment is is completely irrelevant to the topic, and doesn't make any of your claims true. This is a meaningless debate about shades, grades and nuances. Like how you define oppression vs. how I define it. De gustibus non est disputandum, as Cicero said. About matters of taste there should be no debate. OK, your view is your view, but I don't need to wait for some sort of Rwandan genocide to happen here before I panic about what's going on, and consider it oppression. …
/r/MensRights28/07/21 02:49 AM
1

Look, moron, nobody is afraid here of anything, certainly not of weak feminist crap like you and Harris. I simply pointed out that when you say women are never on top then it is a lie, just like anything you stupid feminists emit from yourselves. Now listen: your idiotic attempt to use shaming language, due to the complete lack of any actual facts or evidence of your views, does not work on ME. OK? Moron? You hear me? You guys feminists are the tyrannical and fascist oppressors, you need to get …
/r/MensRights28/07/21 02:05 AM
2

I so badly wish there were more people like you. Sigh...
/r/MensRights28/07/21 01:51 AM
2

Just because you got brainwashed into a cult, it doesn't mean that the insane stuff you hear there is true. So here: THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS PATRIARCHY OR TOXIC MASCULINITY. They are as real as Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny or the bogey man under your bed. These exist only in the heads of cult members, also known as feminists. Like you. I would recommend this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsYKb3T13Wk Now, when you woke up slightly from your delusional fever dream, ask more questions…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 01:50 AM
0

And if you claim that the number of trans-women is so HUGE in this society that they can just overwhelm real women at any place then I want to buy not one, but two (2) bridges from you. Just for accuracy's sake: "Woman who doesn't agree that males can be women" is not the same as "woman". So running those women is not the same as removing all women. Telling the truth needs to be done carefully, you see. Otherwise it is simply the same as lying.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:34 PM
1

Apologies. I didn't get the sarcasm part in this one. Some people put /s after a sarcastic comment when it is ambiguous if readers will get the sarcasm or not.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:27 PM
1

You are NOT and MRA. In my short experience with you, you are simply a feminist troll and infiltrator here whose goal is to spread feminist propaganda and ridiculous attempts to defend the indefensible when it is committed by women and feminists. Look, it is totally irrelevant how may times you heard the truth. It still remains the truth. That you don't want to admit the truth just shows that you are completely controlled by your ideology. Here is an old saying: If the truth hurts, you are livin…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:25 PM
5

Wow, the philosophical depth and nuance. The fact-based rational analysis, the rich supply of evidence. Listen, you feminists never engage in any discussion about facts, truth and reality at all because you are sure to lose as the facts are not on your side. You are morally wrong, are on the wrong side of history, and will be completely discredited and discarded from history forever. So what's a poor feminist to do in such adverse condition of being totally wrong both factually and ethically? Oh…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:02 PM
1

My most sober and realistic estimation is that to maintain the life expectancy gap of men dying 6 years sooner than women on average takes about 400,000 to 500,000 completely preventable, avoidable, unnecessarily and early deaths of men and boys every single year just in this country. That's about 6 million men and boys dying every 12 to 15 years. That is the some number as the Jews killed by Hitler, total. So feminism is a mass-murderous, genocidal and gendercidal political force and movement w…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:40 PM
1

It is really rich and just as much hypocritical that you feminists, who are the biggest perpetrators of injustice come here whining about what you consider injustice which is minuscule issue compared to the real topic and completely irrelevant to it. You bring in those to change the topic because you are losing the debate. You feminists just have this disgusting hypocritical distraction tactic that "when I am losing in a debate with men, let's throw in some minuscule man-hating and shaming facto…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:31 PM
1

This is not about percentages but absolute numbers. The70% maybe true but if it is within a minuscule number compared to the number of men killed in wars by the million then that 70% is completely irrelevant to the topic. You lie. NOBODY EXCEPT YOU said anything about killing women. You brought this irrelevant side issue in to distract from the real topic here, namely the total mistreatment of men in this society where they face deadly dangers like going to war to have the right to vote while wo…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:23 PM
1

Whatever. Stupid feminist shaming language does NOT work on me. F*ck your "sadness", I couldn't care less what you find sad or not. But here: everybody has a right to be afraid for their well-being against a radical and extremist government that is driven by pure hate and nothing else against a (large) part of the population. Such governments must and will be stopped eventually. They will get discredited an put out of power for good. You yourself may be a feminist enemy of men's rights, which ar…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:16 PM
9

By "your side" I meant the feminists' side. The rest is not "women bad" contrary to what you claim, it is about which gender is given permission to use hate speech publicly and which one isn't. Fighting for men's rights very much includes equal free speech rights. When a man says something women don't like, he is instantly shut down a sexist and misogynistic. When a woman says anything bad about men, no matter how despicable it is, including "kill all men", she is applauded as a "strong independ…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:29 AM
6

Used in a social context now with well defined meaning, wolves aside.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:23 AM
1

Wait for the upcoming Harris presidency.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:19 AM
6

Lack of a moral compass.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:13 AM
0

And I want to buy a bridge from you, too.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:11 AM
6

Hope springs eternal.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:10 AM
2

Go ahead, be like Fred Rogers in the middle of the gender wars. You just end up being a Beta slave. Good luck.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:10 AM
1

I think they grow those from the inside out.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:08 AM
4

That might be true, but what exactly has this to do with the current topic, of reversing the genders in a outrageous hate speech piece? Oh, your side is losing, so it's time to declare that "BTW, none of this matters, folks! Nothing to see here". Because, you know, we don't know who is actually posting. Sure. But we do know who is allowed to engage in gender-based PUBLIC hate speech ("Why can't we hate me?", Ï hate men" as published article and book titles and just look at the broadcast and soci…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:06 AM
2

I am all for reversing the genders in that sentence. And EVERY similar f*cking misandrist sentence. Let's see what they will look like in the public eye, and what reactions they will get. Fun!
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:00 AM
39

Calm down. Time to take your medications. Listen, when it comes to hate speech here are the two current options: Do it completely openly, in public, write articles with titles "Why can't we hate men?" and books with titles "I hate men", let your inner demons loose on men, call for the killing of them all, call them all trash, no limit, it will be all published and you get great applause as a strong independent woman. Meanwhile you are surrounded by privileges. This options is only open to women.…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:49 AM
0

You are angry because your side is losing. Here is an old saying: If the truth hurts, you are living a lie.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:32 AM
26

If anybody cared about men's workplace issues, they wouldn't allow the constant harassment of men at work. Endless stories about young men sexually molested by female bosses but they don't dare to report it. Endless stories about false allegations - often anonymous - to take revenge on men for some slight "offense" (essentially some woman at work didn't like what a man did or said). Nah, in this system only women have "workplace problems", no matter how many men die on the job (94% of the fatali…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:21 AM
1

No risk, no business. No pain, no gain. One thing is that if they have do round up too many men, too often, it might get the regime a very bad vibe, unrest would spread, and they would have problems eventually. I might be wrong, just a thought. (Or hope :-)
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:14 AM
2

You are totally right, every single word is true. Absolutely, the West's problem is that it is overtaken by neo-Marxist and neo-Communist ideologies and it is heading in the direction of a totalitarian neo-Marxist regime. You and I know what happens next, but these Western guys are totally clueless. They don't believe it can get that bad here. Too bad that's how Hitler came in power in Germany, nobody took him seriously initially. Although at the time Germany had only two choices, Communism or N…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:11 AM
0

Oh, you call that "value"? Essentially being a prostitute, like on FansOnly? Sorry, I misunderstood your meaning of the phrase "inherent value".
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:57 AM
2

You are probably very right about that. What puzzles me why we are still in this very early phase? How much more do American men want to suffer and how many more must die (from homelessness, workplace accidents, lack of medical attention, lack of education especially of a college degree and suicide just to mention a few of the causes) before they rise up and say "enough"? This just eludes me.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:56 AM
4

Missing the point. Of course Japanese women know that they can go to a sperm bank. But they are not looking for just sperm, they are looking for an attractive - and in East Asia this often includes white - man who will be the earner, preferably with a six digit salary, to provide a good, lazy and luxurious life for the wife. You won't get that in a sperm bank.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:51 AM
3

The article doesn't say directly that the government blames men, only she, the author does. But since she frames the whole thing in the "Japan must be saved from this crisis" type messaging, it implicitly suggests that the cause of the Japanese population problem is men, it is their fault and here is a list of demand that they "should" do - you know because they owe that to the country, or some crap like that. And since the Japanese government indeed panics about the birth rate, she makes hersel…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:48 AM
16

I read the article. The feminist woman who wrote it is completely insane, IMHO. The whole thing is whining about the need to "change the male mindset". Did you get it? Women "changing" men, i.e. controlling them, that is the solution for anything. This is creepy. Then she lists out a long list of demands. Just demands, essentially orders that men somehow "should" for absolutely nothing in return. As always, if anything is not working out, the following must be done as per feminist procedures: Bl…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:13 AM
3

Horrible. Then of course, no media attention, either.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:15 AM
1

Maybe feminist manufactured "science" like "1 in 3 women is raped". You have to be very, very careful with any gender-related "studies" once feminists got their hands on them.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:10 AM
1

If the truth hurts you are living a lie.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:06 AM
1

She sent out the proof of her crime because she felt so entitled that she can do anything to a man and get away with it. She was mostly right. Sad.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:01 AM
1

They HATE the truth. That's the only thing that is common among them.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:57 AM
2

I just signed, thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:55 AM
3

This hypersensitivity stuff has gone way too far. Everybody is offended by everything, so ridiculous. How is "young man" offensive? I'd love to be a young man again. With this whining you are no better than the worst "women are always victims" feminists.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:52 AM
1

Let's try it.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:48 AM
2

/\ this
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:46 AM
2

I read that, too. When it comes to domestic violence, lesbians are the most violent of all, then come heterosexual couples (there is still a woman in there, you see) and finally, the most peaceful are the gay couples. So much about who is more violent, women or men.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:43 AM
2

OK, so here I am afraid you missed the point. Here: even if more women are killed by their husbands (by how much, by the way, do you know? I really would like to know. It may not even be true) than men murdered by their wives, the difference is, from the perspective of a 330 million strong population is minuscule. Having millions of men killed in a big conflict, like WWII or the Vietnam War, on the other hand is a gigantic crime: those men who were forced to go there had nothing to do in their p…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:41 AM
2

Or, when it comes to men's reproductive rights. Which are zero. A woman can get pregnant with a man against his wish (paternity fraud), can abort against his wish (a husband is not required to sign for an abortion, even though it is his baby, too), a woman can even put a baby up for adoption, and again, no signature is required from the man. "My body, my choice" is total BS. You are pregnant only because something that the BODY of a man produced got injected in your body. Half the baby's DNA is …
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:32 AM
1

Exactly. As in this case it feels to women because they are on top.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:28 AM
0

Go ahead, be my guest. It is called "suicide" in case you missed it. But forcing suicide on millions of people by sending them into battles has absolutely nothing to do with whether you or anybody else wants to commit suicide. Totally different topics, and your comment is accordingly stupid.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:26 AM
1

And that's exactly the reason to CHANGE THE LAW.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:23 AM
2

And they (FTM people) are perfectly right about the whole thing. You being who you are, it may be "funny" to you when other people suffer and are miserable (very typical of feminists) but it is not funny for them. This is what happens: Sone lesbian women, after a lot of feminist indoctrination, believe that it is SOOO much better being a man than a woman. They are totally clueless, of course, I said indoctrination, not truth. So they transition FTM, and then suddenly comes the HUGE surprise: lif…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:21 AM
2

So well said. So much about who has "more intrinsic value" than the other gender.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:09 AM
0

BS. This whole "born with inherent value" thing is a myth and a stupid feminist dogma that you are just parroting back here. How about waking up from your dogma and smell reality? I bet you are woman and a feminist, doesn't that feel good to give yourself "inherent value"? How stupid. Yet another feminist-invented entitlement for women. Except that it is total BS. No, you don't have one comma more value than any man. You only have a certain mechanism of how mammals reproduce. I don't give a shit…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:08 AM
0

Absolutely not, see above.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:58 AM
1

Yeah, I totally reject the notion that anybody has "intrinsic value" especially "just by existing". Nobody has any "value" simply by being born. Everybody has certain rights (see the US Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) but absolutely no "value". How would you even measure the "value" of a newborn baby? The thing that is true that women are artificially protected from dangers that men are not, and supported and provided for (with their babies) by (some, stupid) men. The…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:58 AM
1

Stupid, just so stupid. "War" as a phenomenon is not only as old as the human race, it is much older. In closely related animals, like chimpanzees and other apes, regular raids by one group (the males of them, that is) into another groups territory FOR RESOURCES is a given. Here it is, spelled out for you, so that maybe even you can get it: WAR = FIGHT FOR RESOURCES It was not "invented" or "started" "by men"', it is just that reality is about conflicts over resources - like better fruit trees i…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:35 AM
0

Tough. What we are talking about is enacting social change that doesn't happen by you peacefully sitting in a corner, enjoying the silence. Feminists were never bothered by noise, quite the opposite. They make it and as loud as possible. They know what they are doing. I couldn't care less whether you like it or not. This is about regime change in a sense, and yes, that's messy and noisy. Once thing is clear that we CANNOT count on you, for sure. There, all caps, just for you.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:13 AM
1

First of all, men ARE oppressed: 95% of the homeless are men, there are 2000+ women only shelters for that 5% and 0 (zero) men-only shelters for the 95%, 94% of workplace fatalities are men (because nobody cares of spends money or men's workplace issues and safety), men are only 40% of college students, among others because we run affirmative action FOR THE MAJORITY and against a small and shrinking MINORITY), men live 6 years shorter lives (because the vast majority of healthcare resources and …
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:09 AM
1

Those are just examples to make a point. The most recent history that we need to study is the history of feminism and how they took over the government. In particular, physical presence is crucial. The got in power by constant marching, protesting, disturbing public order, harassing onlookers and sure they got all the media attention. The lesson from the Arab Spring, Maidan Square and Hong Kong is exactly that social media presence is nothing, physical presence is everything, and social media's …
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:53 AM
235

These women are completely deranged. They have no clue what it is like to be a man today. They are so entitled and arrogant that it never even crosses their minds that maybe men have problems with certain women's certain actions because of their, the men's, unbearable social conditions. You know, like 95% of the homeless are men, 94% of workplace fatalities are men (because nobody cares about their workplace safety, workplace issue are for women only), there are 2000+ women only homeless shelter…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:44 AM
1

Agreed. Every revolution was also a propaganda war. So will be this. What I disagree with, is that all this will be resolved in the social media, and that's all that is needed. Quite the opposite is true. Social media often worked to organize and coordinate the "physical" (not violent) events. Like the uprising in Egypt some years ago was all coordinated on social media. But it was the produce the event, not instead of it. So studying history is very important but all the worldwide protests e.g.…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 03:58 AM
1

That's no excuse. We can march on a weekend. The feminists never stopped marching because of "lack of time". They MADE time for it. Civil rights marches also took place as black activists pushed and they MADE time for their marches. All of them fully used the weekends. Weekend means more viewers on TV. It is like saying the Founding Fathers were too busy working, so sorry, no revolution will take place due to lack of time, and we are still a British colony. This is just laughable excuse making I…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 03:31 AM
4

Thank you so much for all that, and many, many congratulations and kudos! Men need women MRAs and advocates because men are not listened to. Thank you for the continued help, much appreciated! U R THE BEST!
/r/MensRights27/07/21 03:23 AM
2

I totally agree with you, except one thing. I am dying to find out the country your live in. Is it Ukraine? Surprise: I am also an immigrant from East-Central Europe and that is one of the reasons I am a lot more fiery than these Western guys with zero balls. So I totally agree with you with one exception. The exception is the use of street violence. The police will overpower it and it will be used as an excuse to pass even more draconian anti-male measures and laws. Look how the feminists and w…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 01:29 AM
1

I am advocating exactly the CHANGE of "preference". Men must have build up and in-group preference. We need COLLECTIVE action, not individual action. Women view themselves as a gigantic worldwide collective, their "sisterhood". We need to do the same otherwise we will remain oppressed, traumatized, harmed and hurt, killed or self-killed forever. What exactly is wrong with the idea of a worldwide "brotherhood"? I am not getting it. Men can change internally, that's how MRAs and MGTOWs are made. I…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 11:16 PM
1

It seems that I have to dispel an incorrect notion here. When I say "fight" against our oppression, the word "fight" means POLITICAL fight not literal violent fight. In a political discussion "fight" means just what the topic is here: marches, protests, peaceful assembly and free speech and petitioning the government (like lobbying). I now that violence doesn't solve anything. I am smarter than that. That's why the title is not "why don't men get into street fights" but "why don't men march". As…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 11:10 PM
1

Absolutely not. POLITICAL FIGHT, like marches, protests, peaceful assembly and free speech. Feminist are all full of talk about how they "fight the patriarchy" but that doesn't mean violence on their end, either. "Fight" is a word used in political discussions but never meaning actual violent or physical fight.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 11:05 PM
0

When I say "fight" I mean "political fight", of course, not violence. Political fight means exactly what the topic is here: marches, protests, public action. Peaceful assembly and free speech. NOT violence. Fully agreed, violence doesn't solve anything. I am smarter than that.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 11:02 PM
1

Far from it. You damned only if you don't. Then you can blame only yourself for your misery, oppression, suffering and suicide. Sorry about this repeat but this "we work x hours" and "more feminists will show up" talk is entirely ridiculous. That's like saying the French or American Revolutions shouldn't have happened because the revolutionaries worked 6 days a week and had no time to rebel. This is laughable. A revolution can even be introduced by a general strike (men not going to work, that w…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 10:48 PM
1

If feminists had worried about their initially small numbers and the hostility and mocking from the press they received at the time they would have gotten nowhere. But did they stop (or not even start) their protests and marches just because of the chance of a "bad press"? Not the least. With every social change when you are on the right side of history such things will change and work themselves out. The feminists said "to the hell with them" about conservative commentators at the time who warn…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 10:33 PM
1

Defamation, libel, slander and lies are the main propaganda tools of every oppressor. Comes with the territory. The current-regime media is always for the status quo. When you want to enact social change then, yes, you end up fighting the oppressors' media, too. The old-regime media used defamation, libel, slander, innuendo, intimidation and lies against revolutionaries in the case of every revolution, French, American, all of them. The media was on the King's side and depicted the rebels as a "…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 10:24 PM
2

The current feminist governmental regime is oppressive, everywhere. So they oppress. In other words they "shut down" any dissent. That's why they are called oppressors. Now, when a portion of the population is oppressed then then task is to rebel against the oppressors. Yes, three times as many feminist oppressors show up - initially. But social change starts in small steps. Even when you are initially outnumbered and outgunned, you keep pushing. Initially the feminists protests were small in nu…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 10:16 PM
4

The current media, the current old-regime media, is in their hands and they control it. But the media wasn't always feminist. When feminists first started making noises they were mocked and attacked too. But the media turned around as the feminists became more and more powerful. Now they fully control it. The idea is that we start small but push relentlessly. Even a small event puts out a seed that something is wrong with how men are treated in this society. As more and more events proliferate, …
/r/MensRights26/07/21 10:06 PM
1

Off topic. Go find those reddits to vent. Not here.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:58 PM
1

That's their PROPAGANDA, not the truth. It is absolutely not "apparent" because the truth is the opposite and the opposite is apparent.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:56 PM
1

One of the goals is to destroy the "prevalent norms". Men have to start to think about themselves COLLECTIVELY, just like women do. We need to start to care about each other and to support each other. Men also have to get rid of every last trace of "chivalry". That was an evolutionary product but is completely out of synch with modern society. The first thing on every man's mind should be to fight for and with other men for our rights and for our rightful place in society. Chivalry and such must…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:53 PM
1

The media is THEIR tool, currently. That much is clear. But the "media" in the Ancient Regime in France was also on the King's side. And the British media was on the King's side during the American Revolution, too. Yet those revolution happened - against the media. Same here. A big part of the fight is about discrediting and removing the old-regime media. A valid further questions is WHY is the media on the feminist side. It wasn't always feminist. But it turned around as the feminists became mo…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:47 PM
1

May I kindly request that you as a woman say so publicly? Like Erin Pizzey, Karen Straughan, Janice Fiamengo, the great women MRAs. We need women MRAs, they are crucial. But it makes any difference only if it is public.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:41 PM
1

Off topic. Go find those reddits to went. Not here.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:38 PM
2

Why are you guys so obsessed with the media? This is not about a performance to look good on THEIR media. The media is under their control and serves them. The old-regime media. But this is about regime change, for crying out loud. The media will be on our side after we win because we will control it. As for enemies like BLM showing up, yes every battle is about fighting the enemy on a battle field. Yes, they show up. So we fight them and shut them up. That's the whole point.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:37 PM
1

That's like saying the French or American Revolutions shouldn't have happened because the revolutionaries worked 6 days a week and had no time to rebel. This is laughable. A revolution can even be introduced by a general strike (men not going to work, that will shake this whole rotten system to begin with) and then go to the streets. Employers who carry out feminist policies like quotas and hiring preferences themselves are part of the problem and need to be attacked, not worried about whether t…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:33 PM
1

In every rebellion and revolution the old-regime media mocked and attacked the rebels first. Goes with the territory. Until the rebels win and remove the old-regime media and its apparatchiks. The fight is not simply against feminism or feminists but their whole supporting apparatus, like the old-regime media and politicians. Throw out the bums. Everything can and will be "infiltrated". I am sure there were agents of Louis the XVI sniffing around when the French revolution broke out. But they we…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:27 PM
0

That's not what happened with black men and their "million men march". Our deepest problem is exactly the lack of our group identity, i.e. lack of concern and care of each other. That must be changed. That's the whole point. Collective action. COLLECTIVE, not individual. But in the past, every rebellion, uprising and protest, every revolution was carried out by men. French Revolution, American Revolution, everything. Who do you think did the fighting in those? Men. The difference now is that thi…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:21 PM
1

Read the above comments by others. When feminists first started making noises they were first laughed at, too. That didn't prevent them from radicalizing each other more and more and getting hysterical and hateful more and more. They kept going at it. Now look what's going on now against men. When you start an uprising you cannot be timid. Like "OMG, I will be called a misogynist, the sky is falling!" Kidding me? The whole "misogynist" thing is their invention like all their other shaming langua…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:16 PM
2

And up yours, too, sweetheart.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:07 PM
2

Yes, I am afraid of feminist bullies, just like of any bullies who capture and hijack the government to oppress others. It is of course not feminists themselves who are the dangers, but the government that they captured and that is on their side. Trust me, a group of men can take care of group of uppity insane females, physically speaking. But when the government is on the side of a bullying tyrannical group then we have a big, big problem. That happened in the thirties when a group of antisemit…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:05 PM
8

The whole central point of feminism has ALWAYS been the "oh my God, THE SUFFERING OF WOMEN!" Women are always victims, and only women can be victims, men can always be only "perpetrators", never victims, women were always oppressed, men had all the fun, and did the oppression, oh my, the SUFFERING!!! OF WOMEN!!! THE HORROR!!! Then reality sets in. Statistics come out, about suicide, men live 6 years shorter lives, men are 95% of the homeless (but zero shelters for them, 2000+ the 5% homeless wom…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 04:21 AM
4

Guess what, suffering IS a measurable item. It is measured by many, many statistics. Like suicide (men win huge, 80% of suicides are committed by men), like homelessness (95% of the homeless are men: 75% or the registered homeless and 20% of the rough sleepers), by the number of women-only homeless / crisis centers available (2000+ in the US for that 5% of homeless who are women, 0 (zero) men-only shelters for the 95% of homeless men) and by - UK data here: Every week two women disappear in the …
/r/MensRights29/06/21 01:21 AM
30

That factoid was repeated endlessly by the media in connection with the Sarah Everard case. That means, every 3.5 days a woman goes missing (it wasn't about being killed, it was about disappearing). What they did NOT say is that every 18 hours a man disappears in the UK. So Every 84 hours a woman disappears, this was a huge outrage. Every 18 hours a man disappears, not even mentioned. The ratio is 4.6 so almost 5 times as many men as women disappear in the UK yet, the feminist media didn't even …
/r/MensRights29/06/21 01:11 AM
1

Isn't it fantastic to have people like Ody_ssey in a men's rights discussion forum? Of all places, God.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 12:55 AM
1

EXCUSE ME. WHO commented that custody should NOT be 50/50? WHERE? WHEN? NOT I. How about not slandering and libeling under the excuse of "posting"??? And yes, most haters and oppressors (misandrist, fascist, anti-semite) claim LATER that it was "ignorance". Little problem here: it was WILFUL, intentional ignorance. I think the minimum decency and morality can be expected of all people that before they decide to dismiss another whole group of human beings' suffering and engage in their hatred tha…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 12:54 AM
2

I mean, you don’t really know much about their father to affirm that. I don't know about the people in this particular situation but when I write things like "girls also need their father very badly" I OBVIOUSLY am not writing about these specific girls only but about confirmed knowledge about girls. "his wife got custody of the kids is “a saving factor” for those kids" The children who suffer most by losing their father are boys, who then don't have a father figure and a role model. They end up…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 12:11 AM
3

That is the absolute truth. They didn't give damn about girls, their kidnapping targets have always been boys. Mostly to turn them into child soldiers (and use them as sex and work slaves). Only when they realized that what they really want is Western media attention and huge ransom payments, and that boys don't get that, started they kidnap girls for media attention and money. They still kidnap (and rape and kill) far more boys, but the media circus and most of the money comes from kidnapping g…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 11:27 PM
3

Absolutely. The United Nations, like so many other organizations, has been institutionally captured by feminists and morphed into a feminist tool. But the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was passed in 1948, long before the feminist capture happened. So this is one of the remaining "original documents", together with the US Constitution, including the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights that have not been destroyed, modified or distorted by the feminists. I never said for a s…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 11:22 PM
3

I think that in the longer scheme of things this experience will make you a better person, despite your current problems. You are already a better person by having this insight. If you ever wondered why suicide rates are so high among men (3-4 times the rate for women), now you are getting an inkling. (There are many other causes, too, but family courts are a big killer of men). For that moral, mental and emotional improvement I congratulate you already. However, shame on your former self who di…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 02:31 AM
8

My view: By being a declared, committed and loud anti-feminist and a passionate female MRA. She better had a strong track record in this regard, not just claim things. Nothing less would satisfy me if I had a son. Simply, because I would want to protect my son from the gross societal abuse of men and boys in this horrible, terrible misandrist society, and I would need the help of my (would be or eventual) daughter-in-law. I would always, always very strongly advise my son to go where the female …
/r/MensRights19/06/21 02:04 AM
36

Those moderation policies are discrimination against the designated "not protected" groups. On what basis is "protection" denied to any group of human beings? Here is Article 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations: "Article 7 All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrim…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 01:42 AM
2

You are a good man and please message me, too, anytime something is on your mind or you just need to vent. I love your world view and your loving attitude toward men. I love them, too, even when they drive me crazy because they are so naïve, chivalric and self-destructive. They just need more knowledge, information and education. But they (this actually means "we" since I am a man, too) are still the most wonderful beings on the planet, feminist envy and jealousy notwithstanding. We MRAs who kno…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 01:27 AM
1

I am aware that they don't form an actual political party or something like that, although they have not one but many organized power centers, such as NOW (National Organization of Women) or AAUW (American Association of University Women) that are very powerful lobbying organizations. There is of course a White House Council on Women and Girls, with any mention of a White House Council on Men and Boys being strictly banned, of course. They also "institutionally capture" originally common-good or…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 05:08 PM
2

Agreed. My comment of "why don't they" was intended to be satirical. Of course they won't. I am not that naive. Every totalitarian system and movement made good use of "rubber ring laws" and "rubber ring definitions". These can be used to punish and individual at will, arbitrarily. Examples form the past and present: "damaging the state's interests", "subversive behavior", "anti-state acts", "undermining state interests" , "immoral conduct", "anti-social behavior", "corruption" etc. etc. Anythin…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 05:51 AM
1

It's a shame that there is not a presentation of the the positive aspects of the men's rights movement It is not a "shame" as in an accidental "oh my, have people overlooked this?" but a DESIGN. Wikipedia articles nowadays are intended to render judgment. Men bad, women good. Men's rights bad, feminism good. Adolf Hitler bad, Sally Miller Gearhart good. On and on and on. These are not accidental overlooks but that is an organized project, with the involvement of hundreds of "activists" (activist…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 05:43 AM
14

If he is the "alleged perpetrator" then what is she? The "actual perpetrator". That's what. So disgusting. This is not law enforcement, this is organized governmental abuse. Defund FBI Denver Special Agent Michael Schneider and all police officers who use this kind of abusive language toward our brothers who are the innocent victims.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 06:50 AM
3

I have read it here, on this subreddit, that most men go through their entire lives without anybody, ever, paying a compliment to them. When they suddenly get one, they often walk away with tears in their eyes. Women get compliments like a million times a day, most often from each other. What's so hard that we cannot do it? My friend, Ok_Designer_Things, you did a very good deed. You are a good man, more power and kudos to you. Let's start this movement right here and now. From now on, I will us…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 06:42 AM
1

Is it just me, or is Botswana WAY ahead of the US, Canada, the UK, the EU, Australia and New Zeeland in terms of fairness and equity in the justice system?
/r/MensRights16/06/21 06:18 AM
3

"but it doesn't say that it's bad" Uhm ... Er ... are we reading the same article? Quote: "Reddit's men's rights subreddit (r/MensRights) was included in a list of 12 websites in the spring 2012 issue ("The Year in Hate and Extremism") of the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Report in a section called "Misogyny: The Sites". The SPLC reported that "Although some of the sites make an attempt at civility and try to back their arguments with facts, they are almost all thick with misogynist…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 06:14 AM
4

Most posts to this thread are anti-women and anti-women’s movements If you mean "women's movement" being "feminism" then I have news for you. That mass murderous, fascist and totalitarian political movement and political force, called feminism, also known as "women's movement" is the primary cause and means of the oppression, discrimination and trauma inflicted on men and boys in this society that in the end kills them. The primary method of feminism is the denial of basic human, constitutional,…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 05:51 AM
1

Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way
/r/MensRights16/06/21 05:08 AM
1

As someone said above, badge of honor.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 05:06 AM
10

Why don't they just simplify it to what they really want and define "misogynistic" as "misogynistic, adj. everything that is not explicitly, loudly and aggressively supportive of feminism, feminist claims and feminist goals". There. Done. Clarity has been created.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 05:04 AM
7

The feminists pretty much re-wrote all articles about individual men to belittle their achievements, cast doubt about their character, question their contributions, and re-wrote all articles about women, but to the opposite effect. Example 1: Wikipedia tries to imply that it was really Albert Einstein's wife who invented Special Relativity. Wikipedia quote: "There is eyewitness evidence and several letters over many years that indicate Marić might have collaborated with Einstein prior to his 190…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 04:53 AM
6

everyone takes definitions from Wikipedia as objective science-based truth Count me out. Since it changed into a misandrist feminist propaganda tool, I have never, ever, believed one word of Wikipedia. In technical and scientific matters there is still a lot of useful information there, but you have to be careful. When it comes to the history, origins or genesis of an idea, invention or discovery, they are totally unreliable. They want to minimize the contributions of men and falsely re-assign u…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 04:15 AM
14

Feminists don't do "rigorous", they don't do "evidence", they don't do "encyclopedias" and they don't do "content". Ever. Other than that, point well made.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 04:07 AM
8

Wikipedia has totally degraded itself into a misandrist radical-feminist propaganda tool. The feminists pushed out Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, and institutionally captured Wikipedia. Then they ran feminist "edit-a-thons", hundreds of them sitting in huge hangar-like locations and combing through endless numbers of Wikipedia pages to give them a feminist bias - I mean, "perspective". This included erasing men's names from their contributions and mis-crediting their achievements to wome…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 04:03 AM
3

Amen. I do, too.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 03:52 AM
1

The responses in this thread are the reason I'll never read this sub again. What great news! Hallelujah! You really are the last person to lurk around on this subreddit. Just a thought: have you tried to visualize the reversed-gender scenario (22 year old man butt-slaps his 14 year old sister every time he sees her, despite being told both by the sister and his own mother that it's not OK and he should stop it, yet he continues), and check if you still would be in the same comfortable, reassured…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 03:41 AM
5

Nice. Now welcome to the 2020s.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 08:03 AM
3

He has already told her. His mother has told her. Nothing changed.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 08:01 AM
2

Nonsense. If a 22-year old man was butt-slapping his 14-year old sister, would you say the same thing? "Don't see him as a sexual man, see him as a very weak sister"? Who do you think you are fooling here?
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:57 AM
12

"This a natural sibling fling which has gone too far." If it has gone "too far" then it is no longer natural. Especially after she was told to stop it and she didn't. "no need to label her as a fucking abuser just for ass slapping." If a 22-year old man was butt-slapping his 14-year old sister, DESPITE being told that the sister doesn't want it and is uncomfortable with it, what do you think the man would be labeled as? He could be sent to jail. What would YOU label him? "with his parents as sup…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:54 AM
10

It is simply shocking how many feminists rush to the defense of this abuser in the comments about this case. A 22 year old female butt-slaps a 14 old boy, is told that he is uncomfortable with it, THERE IS NO CONSENT on the victim's part, and these feminists claim it is all OK, it is not abuse, the OP should just ignore it and put up with it, and if an adult sister abuses an underage brother then it is not sexual harassment because "it's your sister". "There is no need to involve freaking law en…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:42 AM
6

It is the epitome of hypocrisy to claim that if it's a sister then it cannot be sexual abuse. What else do you want to call it? An older female butt-slapping an underage boy? If the genders were reversed and a 22 year old man was butt-slapping his 14 year old sister, would you say that "it is not sexual harassment, he's your brother"? You cannot be serious. If you seriously think this way you should be ashamed of yourself. Very, very ashamed.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:17 AM
7

You are weird family, to say the least. Not that I believe it for a second what you claim here, BTW. Anyway, it is an ENTIRELY different thing when there is mutual CONSENT. In this case, however, the OP never gave consent to this, he even protested against it, and made it perfectly clear - in the title of his post, in case you forgot to read the title - that he is very, very uncomfortable with this and told her so. Yet, she continued with the abuse. You feminists always come with this. No matter…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:10 AM
3

If a 22 year old man was butt-slapping her 14 year old sister, would you go on and say "there is no need to get freaking law enforcement involved" and "he might genuinely be doing this as a playful thing"? What a hypocrite you are. Shame on you. Anyway it is WAY time to get law enforcement involved. This is an abusive person who is an adult and abuses a minor. It is highly likely she abuses other underage boys. She will be an abuser all her life. If she is like this by 22, fully an adult, is is …
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:53 AM
6

He already tried "talking to her" and the result was that she made false accusations against her victim. She is an abuser and it is highly likely that she regularly abuses other boys. She will be an abuser all her life, it is time to stop her before even more innocent persons get hurt by this abuser.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:45 AM
11

IMHO she won't give af. He already tried that, and her response was making false accusations. This person is an abuser and nothing will change her. She is way past the point of no return. She will be an abuser all her life, and will continue abusing other innocent persons. It is high time to stop her.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:42 AM
5

This might be wrong but this is my first thought and I share it with you because I am worried about your safety in that household where you are constantly abused and on top of it threatened by false accusations. Secretly video record when she does it, many times, and show it to your mother first, telling her that what she saw wasn't an isolated incident. If nothing improves, move out if you can, by asking a friend to save you from this abuse by giving you a couch to crash on. Contact law enforce…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:39 AM
1

A woman can do whatever damn thing she wants, including walking around practically naked and screech about being "slut shamed". WTF does a slut deserve than shame, for being a slut, in the first place? Anyway, a woman in this society can behave in the worst possible way and be as immoral as she wants to be, and the system will only praise and support her. "Oh my, how strong and independent the little darling is!" Bad behavior is encouraged, supported and publicly praised for women. For men, even…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:29 AM
2

Amen.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:19 AM
1

Are you sure that "society is with us"? Could you point to a few signs?
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:18 AM
1

How about destroying the system that's designed to destroy you and design a new, humane and moral one in its place? Let's join together in this noblest fight in history. HIS story.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:17 AM
1

And that sort of thinking is the root cause of men's suffering. Lack of self-esteem makes a person weak. Feminists want to destroy your self-esteem to weaken you, so that you can't fight back. Now forget all that self-doubt and self-demeaning, wake up to the reality that you are the most wonderful person in the Universe and join your equally beautiful brothers in the most beautiful fight to demolish feminism. Remember how they, feminists, always screech about "demolishing" or "destroying" the "p…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:13 AM
2

Feminism is also the Deep State. Whether it is part of the US Government or not.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:06 AM
1

With 50% of young men and 30% of young women rejecting feminism It is still only 45% of the population. Less than that, actually, since you added "young" to "men". So still 60 to 70% of the population support feminism. Plus the Deep State. Not looing good.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:05 AM
1

"The men's rights movement is growing beautifully, and more and more people are retaliating feminism and it's misandristic actions, as well as the government's." Are you sure this is reality, not just a dream or wishful thinking?
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:02 AM
1

Could you recommend a few? Here and now?
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:00 AM
1

I am mad already. I am just waiting for my fellow men to get mad. What is taking so long?
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:59 AM
1

You are so right. But why not rebel, as a collective?
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:59 AM
1

Men in the West are particularly naive and - in my opinion - stupid. Very easily gaslighted and brainwashed into supporting their worst enemies. They have too much "chivalry" beaten into them and they believe that crap. But perhaps the most important reason is that they are too individualistic and deeply distrust anything smelling collective action. Unlike women. I deeply agree with being against collectivism, but this is the exception because men face a very collectivist enemy. They have to get…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:41 AM
1

More power to South Korean men. They really lead and inspire us. It is time for men to fight feminism and female privileges collectively. Women are inherently collectivist and that gives them all their unfair, unjust and criminal power in today's society. Only if and when men understand the importance of acting as a collective will things change for the better. South Korean men understand this. Western men need to listen to them and follow them.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:32 AM
3

"The only people men can really open up to are paid professionals who are paid to help you get through your issues and turn you into a better person" What I have read, though, is that many of these "paid professionals" are women and feminists, with absolutely zero interest in men's issues and suffering. Their answer, when a man "opens up" about his suffering, is roughly that "the patriarchy forces outmoded gender roles on people, including men, that's your problem, and the best thing for you to …
/r/MensRights10/06/21 06:09 AM
1

The OP posed the question "Do women kill as often as men in relationships?" (In Australia, in particular.) Women who kill - that is clearly about perpetrators. Women who die by being killed - that would be about victims. I am answering the OP's question, not another one. I have a feeling you are answering another question because the answer to the original question contradicts your intended narrative about women being only victims, never perpetrators, and men are only perpetrators and never vict…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 04:54 AM
2

Short answer: NO, your article doesn't show at all that men commit more killings in relationships. I don't see that in the article at all, unless I missed something, in which case could you point it out specifically. The article only lists the female vs. male percentages of the victims (55% female - 45% male, 10% more female victims than male victims) but doesn't show at all the absolute numbers or percentages for female vs. male perpetrators. Which is the question the OP proposed. There is no p…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 11:43 PM
2

Feminists never mention that men die 7 years younger than women. But there is a plethora of reasons for that. They just don't care about men's deaths, to them men are completely expendable and disposable. They absolutely don't care about men's suffering in any form and about the lack of resources for men. Feminists have absolutely no moral compass. A man would never behave with regard to women as they behave with regard to men. In short, feminists are absolute monsters, IMHO.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 10:30 PM
28

This lie, that no matter what happens "women are most affected" has been going on forever and endlessly in the media. Very much with Covid, too. Men catch Covid more than women, get sicker from it than women and more men die form it than women. Yet, I have lost count of the articles claiming that women are more affected by Covid than men. Yes, the feminist articles always come out about "women are most affected" - no matter what happens. There is a pattern they use. When a bad event, say event X…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 06:01 AM
15

"Women dv victims do not get that comforting knowledge. Many do not know if they will survive the abuse. It is scarier. It is more brutal. It is more traumatizing." Your claim here is extremely suspicious to me. Yes, in the media etc. this "women fear for their life in DV cases" claim is repeated endlessly and you might have internalized it but neither repetition nor internalization make a claim true. Here is my issue: if for women, risking a DV situation is so scary and they fear for their live…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 05:22 AM
2

Do you have any source or data on your short answer? Thank you in advance.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:46 AM
1

Yes, I am aware of all these immoral, unfair and unjust entitlements. Thanks for the reply.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:59 AM
1

I know you wouldn't read it because you don't care about the truth and finding out the truth would hurt you false "narrative" that oh, feminism is so nice, there are only a few crazies blah blah. Guess what, I did not write this for you at all. I wrote all this hoping that there will be other reddit readers who will read it and understand it.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 08:05 PM
1

Absolutely, what an abomination that case was. The British police ("Crown Prosecution Service" or what the heck they call it over there) intentionally and criminally framed a completely innocent man only because its insane, man-hating, misandrist feminist director Alison Saunders set a goal of increasing rape persecutions by one third. No matter what. The cases weren't there, so she ordered the CPS to fabricate cases and arrest innocent men by framing them. Of course it is a very serious crime, …
/r/MensRights22/05/21 08:27 AM
1

Yes, I know that you are an idiot, you don't have to visually prove it.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 07:47 AM
1

"The wage gap still happens worldwide even if its illegal in some countries" What is your evidence for this? I think you are just repeating feminist dogma without any evidence because you are brainwashed into it. BTW the "wage gap" supposed to be about Western societies not about third world countries. But since it is obviously not true in Western countries, feminists are just trying to murky the waters by bringing third world countries in, about which they know nothing and which are vastly diff…
/r/MensRights22/05/21 07:33 AM
1

It is not what individual person say or do to other individual people. It is about what goals movements (like BLM, feminists) who are in power have, and the public policies they enact. There are good and bad black people and white people, good and bad gay people and straight people good and bad women and men etc. The question is what groups in power do, not what individuals say or do in private.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 11:18 PM
1

Your "wage gap" is a totally debunked myth. It tries to show that men earn more money per year but it totally ignores that men work something like 6 weeks more per years than women, period, so no wonder men make that much more. Moreover, women often choose less stressful, easier jobs ("air-conditioned jobs") that pay less than the grueling jobs many men do (miner, firefighter, oil rig worker etc.) Men of course die a lot more on the job (94% of work fatalities are men). So in the end the yearly …
/r/MensRights21/05/21 11:00 PM
1

What's wrong with feminism? Only that feminism is a fascist movement and feminists are evil people. That's because they target a biological subgroup in the population, white men, as the group to-be-hated, they attack, demonize and defame them in their hate campaigns in the media and often call for their extermination (Valerie Solanas and Sally Miller Gerhart are examples, but so is #killallmen). They target this subgroup purely for their biology (race and gender) when biological traits are not c…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 10:38 PM
1

And just why would they make these steps? When there is a much easier solution? Take over all power in society, control all institutions and the media and build out a totalitarian system where people live in fear and don't dare to criticize anything you do, no matter how cruel and barbaric that might be. How about that option? Because I think that's what happening, not any any turning away from feminism. Most women are just extremely image conscious and the most important thing in life for them …
/r/MensRights21/05/21 10:23 PM
1

i believe most civilizations get very progressive to a point, then start to become more conservative again No, most civilizations get progressive until the meaning of "progressive" becomes "totalitarian" and then the civilization becomes a totalitarian tyranny. Keep in mind all totalitarian systems, such as Communism and Nazism started by claiming how "progressive" they were. Communism was fighting "for the working class", in case you didn't know. The Nazi party was also fighting for "the German…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 10:14 PM
2

I totally disagree. Feminism, BLM and all other wokes and SJWs are an "evil alliance" who just want to extract more and more privilege and money from society for themselves even when they are already privileged with their affirmative actions, quota systems, priority and preferential hirings and admissions, the endless government monies dedicated to them, the endless government, state and local institutions dedicated to them (White House Council on Women and Girls, of course but none on men and b…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 09:49 PM
2

Of course you haven't because they want to distance themselves from the image of feminism. But I bet none of your girlfriends ever spoke one word against all the discrimination and injustice committed against boys and men by feminists. That's my whole point: women secretly and silently like the oppression, discrimination and cruelty perpetrated by feminists against men and they do like to see men suffer. They are just silent about it, hide it, and pretend that they are not beneficiaries. But the…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 09:26 PM
1

I talked about (cross-) posted. If it wasn't the OP herself who cross-posted then what I don't get is why the person who cross-posted did the cross-posting. It is still a mostly anti-male rant ridiculing a particular man, even though the man deserves to be ridiculed, he is a feminist asshole. But what does the whole thing have to do with men's rights, she whining about the BF being an asshole, while she clearly used female privilege to get all the scholarships and priority admissions and what no…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 09:18 PM
1

I understand that we want to be on the moral high ground compared to Nazi shit like FDS. But being taken over and then get neutralized and ridiculed and trivialized if too many feminists start posting here is something we also don't want. So I am just thinking about some compromise to prevent a feminist takeover, while welcoming all women who are on our side. There must be some way.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 09:11 PM
2

I am questioning the purpose of this one post. Otherwise I don't care about the OP and her views. She clearly stated that both of them are feminists, so why is she posting here? Feminists are the very definition of "enemy of men's rights". She posting here can come only from ulterior motives, methinks.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:42 AM
13

6 years for raping a minor dozens of times. I wonder what a man would have gotten in the reversed-sex version. 60 years, maybe?
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:37 AM
3

I have no idea why the OP (cross-) posted their petty and ridiculous couple-fight. What does this story have to do with men's rights? They are both feminists. I have the feeling that she posted this story here to shame a man, even though in this case rightly. If we believe the whole story which I don't, due to lack of any evidence. I.e. what she is doing is man-shaming with the intention of weakening the cause of men's rights, intentionally, because she is a feminist (hey, even the BF is). I hav…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:25 AM
27

I see it very differently. Refusing to give details about your side of the story, especially when you are the accuser, to me, is the clearest sign that the story is bogus and made up. Why wouldn't you want to give details when you claim that you were attacked? The only conceivable reason of not wanting to give details is that there are no details because story didn't happen. If a police officer dares to ask a woman about her claims then it is "they already had made up their mind" is ridiculous. …
/r/MensRights21/05/21 03:51 AM
10

More men die of Covid and men get sicker. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/men-more-susceptible-to-serious-covid-19-illnesses https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7271824/ https://www.dw.com/en/why-do-more-men-die-from-covid-19/a-53952130 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/26/health/coronavirus-men-immune.html https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19741-6 nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19741-6 https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/why-are-more-men-dying-from-covid-19-than…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 03:30 AM
4

TL;DR: women distance themselves only from the image of feminism but they do like what feminists do, and are silent accomplices and enablers of feminism. I am not so sure that the future is getting better. The majority of women are distancing themselves only from the image of feminism but fully support, even if silently, everything feminists do. They are beneficiaries of it. So the image is getting better but not reality. I consider an accomplice and enabler of feminism a feminist, regardless wh…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 03:05 AM
5

Not limited to academia and corporate jobs. Feminism is very much about government jobs. First, many don't like the competition and stress that comes with corporate jobs, but is mostly absent from government jobs. Secondly and more importantly, they very much aim at total power = totalitarian power over society. So they are the loudest and most aggressive in the government and legislation. Hence the many pro-female, anti-male public policies and budget allocations. Third, due to wanting power ov…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:47 AM
4

"ïs just a vocal minority" So why doesn't the "majority" call them out and shut them up? My answer: the vast majority of women do like what feminists do. They do like all the privileges, budgets, money and legal impunity that feminism misappropriates, without any thought of the consequences for men. They do like it. They just don't want to call themselves feminist because by now all the injustice and immorality feminism commits is widely known and undeniable. It is known that men suffer as a con…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:34 AM
6

This is satire. The Babylon Bee is a satirical magazine, not a serious one.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:47 AM
3

"men are portrayed as powerful" No, men are portrayed as evil. I wish it was only "powerful".
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter