TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StudentOfTheTruth1 Archive

View 6 posts and 206 comments by StudentOfTheTruth1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Biased hateful crap, written by a biased hateful woman, not worth reading.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:49 AM
1

The dirty pigs. And I am NOT talking about the Gambian boys.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 04:00 AM
22

I was a feminist until ... ... until I found out what feminism really was about.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 03:56 AM
2

This in a supposedly "free" country. The real problem is those cops / security people. They are all biologically men and look what they do. All of them are manginas and as such the enablers and enforcers of this current form of fascism we live in. They are the real enemy.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 03:47 AM
5

She was a wonderful person. And regrettably, she also demonstrated that yes, in this society, being a man (by birth or choice) can easily be cause for suicide. She put a fitting epitaph on this macabre era of history.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 03:30 AM
1

Them = feminists and women who believe them. Not vague, very concrete.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 03:15 AM
1

I am not here to discuss labels. The essence counts.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:04 AM
2

The real problem is the newspaper (if a propaganda tool can be called that name) that publishes such junk with such a junk title.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:59 AM
2

I've been trying and but haven't been nearly as successful as you. When I talk to them, most men get uncomfortable, look back with blank stares, dismiss me and want to change the topic. Women get even more uncomfortable, become hostile, start screaming and attacking me as a person, like what's wrong with me. I just don't have your touch. I am dying to be present when you do that, especially the woman part. We should make a billion clones of you and release you into the sea of humanity. Like an a…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:39 AM
8

I'm way more of a man than them, I'm gay! More power to you, you definitely are a lot more of a man than them. You ARE a real man! They are not men. That's why I call them manginas. Just to be clear: a mangina is NOT a man. I don't get manginas myself because it is not that they get sex or anything, either. Women actually hate weak men and nothing screams "weak" louder than "feminist man". A thoroughly disgusting, pathetic species.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 08:24 AM
1

More specifically, how will investing in men's issues relieve some of my day to day burdens?" Well, I understand when Jane Q says that. But John Q? A lot, if not all, of his day to day burdens are the result of this societal gynocentrism and misandry. How can changing that not help John Q? I think the real problem is men themselves. Most of them are blue-pilled, passively taking any suffering imposed on them, not realizing that they are their own worst enemy and that they are digging their own g…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 08:17 AM
3

You are a good man, probably a lot better than I. But I have run out of patience. OK, they were misled, manipulated, confused. But that excuse has an expiration date. Seeing reality, daily, with their own eyes is not enough for them to wake up? Like being in the London underground under those gigantic posters of "staring is a crime" and "it's not her who sends death threats" and all. That's not enough for them to wake up? Well, tough. There is a limit of how far I can accept "ignorance". My bigg…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:54 AM
1

“If everyone hates you, it’s probably your fault” So when Jews were hated in Nazi Germany it was their fault? I can't believe that anybody could possibly agree with this. It is basically blaming the victims of hate speech. There is such a thing that the majority of a society is hateful and completely wrong. Other than Nazi Germany, this gynocentric and misandrist society is exactly the best example. When feminists and women who follow them express hate towards me, I definitely take it as a badge…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:38 AM
1

They did not show a single source. Without that my reaction is "it is all lies".
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:28 AM
2

That subreddit doesn't allow me to post anything, even though this was the first time I went there. I think it is because of I am a member here. So couldn't respond anything to their sick misandry. A good reason for me to never to go back there again.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:21 AM
9

Srebrenica massacre. Rwanda genocide. Ukraine war. Men are always the overwhelming victims of any organized violence. Only in is this upside-down clown world do feminists try to make it look the opposite. Never believe them; they always lie.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:17 AM
1

These damn misandrists don't even realize how disgusting they are. The real problem is "activism" of any sort. It is the exact opposite of "democracy" and should not be tolerated outside of charity work.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:14 AM
3

"I come to believe that not only are women's spaces not interested in parity or hearing men's perspectives, they are actively hostile to it" Welcome to reality! What took so long? "I thought The Next Movement could be a unified gender movement where we all collaborate for the most fair and equal society and treatment" Absolutely none of this will happen. I can't believe so many men are so naive. Blue-pilled, wanting to marry, becoming manginas (= male feminists). What's wrong with you guys, for …
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:12 AM
4

That is an excellent point. I have a degree in the Classics (Latin, in particular), and indeed, one of the reasons the Roman Empire declined and fell was the dilution of the legions. The root problem was that the actual Romans, in Rome, weren't reproducing enough to populate the legions, so more and more soldiers had to be recruited from the provinces (colonies). Already Augustus, the first Roman emperor, noticed this and voiced his concern. He turned out to be prophetic.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:05 AM
2

That guy is a mangina. Try to get another roommate as soon as practically possible, and totally and visibly ignore him in the meantime. If the ever asks why he is being ignored by you, you can tell him that "I am not interested in interacting with a person with your views." If he wants details tell him that you lost respect for him based on his online behavior. But only to the point where you are safe from him giving you trouble in return. If you think he can give you trouble, just visibly ignor…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:53 AM
16

I have never had and never will, pay 1 cent to Netflix. They are going down in flames, deservedly, for "get woke, go broke". This extends to all Hollywood products these days, BTW, they are totally unwatchable crap. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:40 AM
1

They are disgusting. You are right on every single point. What a bunch of pathetic losers.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:37 AM
6

That is totally and completely abuse and the school should be sued for it. Your parents, if they aspire to the title of "parent" at all, should go ahead and sue the school. Involve lawyers and the media. If your parents refuse, saying all kind of things like "oh, well, it is too much trouble, you are big boy, you can handle it", then go ahead and tell them in their face: "You are failing me as my parents, you are not my parents at all, and the moment I can I will leave you and never talk to you …
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:34 AM
2

Oh, absolutely. As for quotas, we know what kind of equality they want: the Australian 100% female quota for management, but no quota for construction workers is a perfect example: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wm789o/100_female_quota/ They want "equality" only when it comes to highly paid, air-conditioned office jobs, preferably with short and flexible hours. But no interest in back-braking, hard, stressful, life-shortening, dangerous and dirty jobs. And when these pay more, as w…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:26 AM
2

You say that she is totally wrong, it is backwards, misogyny is the response to unprovoked and baseless misandry. The important thing is that they always shamelessly claim all kind of lies without any evidence and without batting an eyelash. You have to do the same. Don't argue just tell in her face the exact opposite and leave her there.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:13 AM
1

This is a standard method so many women use in divorce cases. False accusation of DV. It shows what a disastrous mistake it was to get married to woman in the first place. You should have read this subreddit for a long time before making such a fateful decision. That's what MGTOW is all about but it might be too late for you now. Many men are blue pilled and say things like how much they want to get married one day and have children and bla, bla. Then they get red pilled only when something like…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:10 AM
1

It's international https://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:04 AM
3

Men are the victims of 75% of all violent crimes. What the f*ck is that person talking about. Fake made-up statistic.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:01 AM
11

Mangina. That's the name for those men. And they are the real enemy. As long as manginas exist it can be correctly said that the situation is men's fault. Without manginas, against a united front of men, there is no way the feminists could do what they are doing. Down with the manginas. I think we need to start a movement of men specifically targeting manginas. A kind of "white feather" movement. The moment you see or hear a mangina, walk up to him and tell him how disgusting he is and that he i…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:00 AM
10

Simply being "more dignified" won't get you anywhere. They will take full advantage. You have to fight the misandrists and feminists with any means necessary.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 05:54 AM
2

Feminists are so cruel and brutal and barbaric that it is clear to me by now that feminism is a serious mental illness with a huge amount of sadism in it. Feminists are sadist perverts, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 05:51 AM
2

I think saying such things as "feminism is losing" is way, way too optimistic and wishful thinking. I am afraid we are very far from that. This their regime we live in and they are intrenched incredibly deep. The biggest problem is that so many men = manginas, simps, support them and collaborate with them to throw their fellow men under the bus. That's the first thing that has to change.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 05:50 AM
1

I wonder what the feminists will come up with next about how this is not her fault, this is justifiable, and that it is his fault, and all men's fault and she is the victim here. It is worth following this case. I wonder what sentence will be given. So far she has been released on bail and no charges are filed. My bet is she will just get away with it. Probably not even her doctor's license will be revoked even though she tried to kill somebody. So much about "a respected doctor who only wants t…
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:50 AM
1

This dispute is about "respect" and what is "disrespectful". It revolves around having an act that is disrespectful to her (the boyfriend liking other women's bikini pictures) and another act that is disrespectful to him (she posting bikini pictures of herself while dating him). The question is who can be disrespectful to the other and who cannot be. And her answer is unequivocal: nobody can be disrespectful to ME while I can do whatever damn thing I want. Because gender. Whose pictures are post…
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:44 AM
1

This is not the first time that a court in India rules that just because a woman is an adulterer and cheats on a husband, the husband still has to pay "maintenance" for life. Even when the husband divorced her for the cheating.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:32 AM
1

I think this is unconscionable. The law is not means-tested. Meaning that women get free products (paid mostly from men's taxes), NO MATTER HOW RICH THEY ARE. So multimillionaire and billionaire women will get free products. Meanwhile there are no free razors or other shaving and hygiene products for men no matter how poor. So: billionaire woman gets free products, homeless man gets nothing. Simply mind boggling that this can happen in a free democracy. Something is so rotten in this horrible sy…
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:27 AM
4

Not everyone speaks English in Japan. Far fewer than generally assumed, and it is a problem for expats in Japan, until they learn Japanese.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:22 AM
0

There are 355K people here on Men's Rights, if 10% of them are women MRAs (which is way more than reality which might closer to 1%) that's 35K woman MRAs out of 170 million or so women in the US. But just on Reddit, there are millions (or tens of millions) of subscribers to all the feminist, gynocentric and misandrist subreddits combined. Yes, there are woman MRAs, it is just that there are not many. So what difference do they make. Meanwhile feminists number in the tens of millions (including m…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 11:33 PM
2

Also, Asian gay romantic fiction, called Boys' Love or BL, is more popular than Asian lesbian romantic fiction, called Girls' Love, or GL. BL is spreading really rapidly in Asia, and Thailand is the main exporter of it (even though it originated in Japan). In addition, male pop idol groups, like BTS in K-pop, also make more money and are generally more popular (have more fans) than girl groups. So it is not the case that in all entertainment fields men make less than women. This seems to be espe…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 11:20 PM
17

"According to U.S. census data, men spend an average of 41.0 hours per week at their jobs, while women work an average of 36.3 hours". https://www.google.com/search?q=men+work+longer+hours&rlz=1C1UEAD_enUS930US930&oq=men+work+longer+hours&aqs=chrome..69i57.4667j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Men earn more money because men work 2 and a half weeks longer per year than women, on average. In addition, men have most of the really demanding, stressful, physically back-breaking, life-shortening, dangero…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 11:08 PM
25

I noticed the same. I tried to dig to find the gender breakdown, in vain. It is very suspicious and it is very likely that they are mostly male as otherwise the article would be wallpapered all over with the word "girls". As it practice in the media. Something bad happens to women or girls, they are identified as such. Something bad happens to men or boys they are "locals", "civilians", "villagers", "students" etc. It is almost like reverse psychology to find out the truth.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:29 PM
5

It's because they know damn well women harm children often https://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:20 PM
1

I realized we had these things in Thailand called beer gardens Biergarten. It is actually a German thing originally but you are right, the German Biergarten is really just a beer pub (with outside seating). Love and more power to Thailand BTW (from the US). Keep up the BL :-)
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:04 PM
2

That's the number one threat. And our number one focus should be how to overcome the feminist attack. Everything else is really secondary and will work itself out as long as the feminist attack is counteracted.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:01 PM
2

I think that should be optional. British gentlemen's clubs should be the guiding model. Fused with the elements of a political party.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:57 PM
2

Part of this is true. Men communicate much better "shoulder to shoulder" i.e. while doing something else than "face to face" like women prefer, doing nothing but talking. The part that is not true is that men are completely capable of running political organizations and movements whose goal is just that, not something else on the side. May I remind you that all political parties and movements, prior to feminism, were started and initially hundred percent populated by men. Yes, that includes the …
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:54 PM
2

And another roughly 4 billion of us.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:30 PM
2

I hope that the deep transparency of the club will not only save it but totally crush the people who seek slander and libel. As much as I root for you, the above statement might be the naivety of the century. You really need to see what reality you are dealing with. Feminists like Valerie Solanas and her cult followers, RadFem Hub dwellers, Sally Miller Gearhardt cultists openly want to murder all men, boys and male embryos or reduce men to 10% of the population, forever. That kind of fascism we…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:29 PM
3

woman really hate when men have things that don't include them But they have absolutely not problem excluding men. The cynicism, hypocrisy and hate are just suffocating.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:25 PM
1

The moment "for men" is included in the name / title it probably ends before it even began.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:20 PM
2

I recommend not to have a name or to have a disguise. Otherwise it will be shut down. See what happened to MGTOW subreddits and websites. We should be very clear by now what the feminist game is about. It is about the enslavement of men in a female supremacist society, and tell me how many organizations and clubs slaves had. You get the point about how feminists relate to men's groups. You need eternal vigilance.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:19 PM
2

They are family oriented which mostly means gynocentric preaching about the obligations of men towards women and children. They are not going to help one comma with men's issues and rights.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:14 PM
1

I feel that referring to places like motorcycle gangs and church groups are a distraction from the issue of men's organizations. Motorcycle gangs are not organizations but a lifestyle, and church groups are about religion not about men's issues and rights. In fact, religious groups are gynocentric and all are into preaching about the "responsibilities" of "good men", which are mostly toward family, i.e. wife. As in "rights are for women, responsibilities are for men" which is an old feminist thi…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:12 PM
1

And there's guys in TwoX. The name is "simp". Or "mangina".
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:05 PM
1

There are female MRA's, yup. How many, I wonder. 2XC, FDS etc. have tens of millions of women in them. Numbers and proportions count.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:03 PM
5

We do live in a rape culture. It is strong and prevalent. I would take issue with that. As shown in the chart and data, rape affects about 1.1% of both men and women. Many other categories of crime victimizations are higher. 1.1% is not a "culture" or and "epidemic". But it is just exploited in feminist propaganda as a scare and victimization tactic against men, to extort unjust feminist laws, regulations, rules and policies.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:01 PM
1

I am afraid there isn't a single Western country to move to, unless you count some East-Central European countries like Hungary. But they are not safe either, they are under EU-feminist pressure and are just an election away from being feminist controlled. China might work but then you have to put up with a Communist surveillance and oppression state. My view: since the whole planet is f*cked up, leave the planet. That's what I am working on. Not directly advocating the "s" word but that's what …
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:56 PM
5

Men are not losers in feminist controlled countries but an oppressed, discriminated against and abused minority.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:51 PM
5

He didn't say one word about LGBT. It is about being free from feminist hate and oppression as a man.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:50 PM
5

Shaming short men in response to a post that has absolutely nothing to do with them but has everything to do with feminist cruelty to men is unconscionable.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:49 PM
2

That's Earl Silverman's story.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:45 PM
1

I am of not aware of them. Could you provide links to those? Keep in mind that the fact that "somebody, somewhere wanted to open one" is not the same as having one. Look up Earl Silverman's tragic story. Even that one was in Canada, not in the US.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:45 PM
2

We don't know the facts behind this outburst. What is clear that it is a Me! Me! Me! rant. I am not convinced that she necessarily had a "bad taste in men" because that would imply that the men were all bad. Not knowing the facts I don't buy it. I think it is just an unhinged narcissistic rant. She only blames others, has only demands, and I guess also that includes the man must be a mind reader. All of it is just too typical to be believable. But you are right about the hypocrisy. Whenever a pe…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:38 PM
3

"Spreading words of Atheism in Medieval Catholic Europe" I would like to be just a touch optimistic. The Reformation, the Renaissance and the Enlightenment all came in due course in Medieval Catholic Europe. Eventually words of atheism started to spread with the Scientific Revolution and the Church lost. All of those were much attacked and maligned by the Church authorities initially but that didn't stop the spread. Yes, endurance is the key.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:26 PM
2

branded by SJWs as a misandrist site Do you mean misogynist? I have never seen a SJW to brand anything "misandrist".
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:19 PM
3

Your fear of talking about this even to your family is such a strong symptom that it can be considered evidence. Namely that under the rule of the Gestapo, the KBG and the Stasi, this was exactly the case. Spouses, children, students, teachers and colleagues were all expected to spy and report on their own loved ones, family members, teachers, students and coworkers. That's the feminist dystopia we live in. And it will go down in history as such.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:17 PM
9

There is a Wiki 4 Men https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Main_Page I am not very familiar with it but it has a long article on the MRM to counter the Wikipedia lies: https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Men%27s_Rights_Movement Also a non-unhinged article on MGTOW, as opposed to the unhinged one on Wikipedia: https://wiki4men.com/wiki/MGTOW It might be a start.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:14 PM
3

Here is my concern, though: just how many woman MRAs are out there? Especially compared to the millions of male feminists. I know the names of a few famous ones (Erin Pizzey, Karen Straughan, Bettina Arndt, Janice Fiamengo and a number of others), but they are in the single digits. That's out of some 400-500 million women in Western countries. Counting all the ones on this subreddit (let's say a few thousands?) still makes it something like 0.001% or so of all women. That is to be compared with …
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:08 PM
1

Brilliant. Just my view and you are free to disagree.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:57 PM
4

There is a simple reason why the are so hysterical about it: THE TRUTH HURTS.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:56 PM
2

Not just male porn stars, male models also get a fraction of female models. Which is an actual pay gap as opposed to a fake one.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:54 PM
8

No signs of oppression. Ample signs of cynicism and hypocrisy. As in "gender pay gap!!!!" and such. (Gender pay gap is actually a lie, long debunked.)
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:53 PM
58

Feminist: "A woman makes 78 cents for every dollar a man makes!!!!" "Me: "Can I be honest? I don't really care. Supply , demand, simple." Feminist: "Male dominated fields have higher salaries!!!!!" Me: "Can I be honest? I don't really care. Supply , demand, simple." (Gender pay gap is actually a lie, long debunked.)
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:48 PM
4

It is 1.1%. The same rate at which men are "made to penetrate". https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262306031_The_Sexual_Victimization_of_Men_in_America_New_Data_Challenge_Old_Assumptions Scroll down and click on the leftmost figure. The leftmost two columns are the ones. I should have said "about 1 percent" not "less than", I was in a hurry. Since then I wrote up a post about the whole rape business but it is still waiting for approval by the mods. If it appears it will have the title "Bye…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 01:38 AM
1

OK so I see this completely differently and you can disagree. But to me, most women are totally full of themselves with this pregnancy thing. I don't care. It is only 9 months, while the baby, if it lives for 90 years, it will be always, for 90 years, half his fathers child. Half of the DNA comes from the father, for life. Pregnancy is only 9 months and I don't see the hoopla about it. It is an automatic process that Mother Nature took care of millions of years ago. Every female goat, sheep, cow…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 01:18 AM
10

He didn't say that more men than women are single, only that more men are single than in earlier eras. I think the truth is that while there are more single men than before but even more single women than before and also more single women than single men. This Matos guy is a feminist propagandist and doesn't add the part that is inconvenient for women to hear. I also think "single" and "lonely" are not necessarily the same things, as women always form groups and aren't necessarily lonely when si…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:41 PM
3

666 It has a symbolic meaning, though.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:33 PM
1

A long-held thought of mine that I want to repeat every time I can. With all the circus and hoopla about "women's reproductive rights", has it ever occurred to anybody that ONLY WOMEN HAVE REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS???? In this society???? Men have absolutely zero reproductive rights (see your story) and it is an obscene violation of the most basic humanity, decency and morality in a modern society. This must change. Everything related to reproduction must be made as close to a 50-50 decision by a man …
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:40 PM
3

My view. Yes, it is impossible to discuss with people who believe in the "patriarchy". Because they believe in a non-existing phantom, made up solely for the purposes of feminist man-shaming and propaganda. It doesn't exist, yet they believe in it. That's irrational and such a belief excludes the possibility of a rational conversation. It is like trying to have a discussion about childhood beliefs with an adult who believes in Santa Claus.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:31 PM
12

When blind men are harassed for "staring", it is certain that they are completely out of their minds. We are dealing with medically certifiable insanity in case of feminism, folks. Feminism should be categorized as a mental illness and dealt with accordingly. They = feminists (including male) and women who believe them.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:24 PM
8

If I had a dollar for every women-only club, organization, association, "safe space", academic space, gym, academic program, scholarship program who DO SEGREGATE BY GENDER I would be rich man. Two bucks for the 100% female quota in Australia. What this reveals is the new, feminist concept of "fair": women discriminate = fair, men have their own organization of any type = unfair and must be shut down, now. Sounds like an advanced doublespeak course. Thanks but no, thanks.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:14 PM
2

There are even more feminist trolls here because this sub doesn't ban anybody. Unlike the feminist ones.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:03 PM
1

And big government salaries and lots of power to order men around. For fun, if nothing else.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:58 AM
2

Beats me how "discrimination" can ever be "positive". Keep going down on this path and soon you will have "positive mass murder" if it's the mass murder of men. Like in Valerie Solanas or in Sally Miller Gearhart. Or in #KillAllMen. Good going. Just keep it "positive", that's the secret.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:56 AM
1

Clown world.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:53 AM
2

The ratio is 2,100 to 1. As per "equality" and "equity".
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:52 AM
1

That kind of thing was illegal ever since the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863. Yes, there are criminals who do illegal things and break the law. Breaking the law is called committing a crime, like what those people did. They knew perfectly well that slavery was illegal every since 1863. This kind of thing (pushing people into "debt" to make them work) is still happening e.g. in South East Asia. People are even kidnapped and forced to work on fishing ships, deprived of their freedom. The differ…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:47 AM
3

It is far more serious than it seems. Feminists and women who believe them fully internalized this "it's different. I am a woman and he is a man so it's different". This is their standard line and what this expresses is that "I have the female privilege that is denied to men. That's because we women are the ruling class and you men are the underclass. As such we have the privileges of the ruling class, in particular we can do goddamn anything we like to you, while you men in the underclass have …
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:26 AM
2

The "skills deficit" is complete nonsense. Another piece of feminist propaganda to divert attention from the fact that dating and especially marriage are totally not worth it for men, as there are only downsides without any positives. So many men stay away. Then the feminist propaganda machine revs up in the media because (a) it hurts their pride that men actually reject and avoid women. So they need, and invent, a "narrative" (in today's doublespeak "narrative = lie"). Namely that it's not what…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:03 AM
12

Here is a warning for whatever it is worth. I think it shouldn't have a name. Not even an acronym like MGTOW. The moment it is identifiable in any way, the hordes of feminists will descend on you and will shut it down by the force of the government and media power. Because mis-ohhh-gyhhh-nhhhyh!!!!! Just remember what happened to MGTOW websites and subreddits etc. I've been thinking about this, too, and thought that the safest is not only not to have a name but you should have "plausible deniabi…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:43 AM
3

This is supposed to be an "art" project in the UK, funded by taxpayer money. It makes perfectly clear that this 'government" is NOT for everybody. It is oppression and discrimination of some part of the population by government power.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:24 AM
4

The way I see it, she might have developed some awareness but it is very weak and limited. It is a hundred times worse for men than she presents it here, so she got maybe 1% right. Like she seems to have zero awareness of the statistics about 80% of suicides being men, 99% of combat deaths, 94% ow workplace deaths, 95% of the homeless without a single men-only shelter (and 2000+ women only shelters for their 5%), boys being squeezed out of education by hateful treatment, men being only 40% of co…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 11:35 PM
1

Propaganda grown out of feminist panic of men not marrying women. The whole thing is one scare-mongering bit after the other of "OMG, married man are soooo much better off!!!! Being an unmarried man is sheer horror!!!!" Intended conclusion: men should become voluntary slaves to women (current meaning of "marriage"), that will solve all their problems. Where the lie is: first, married men must make more money as demanded by the wife and kids (if they have kids). It requires more work, time, stres…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 11:11 PM
2

Boycott Netflix and be vocal calling for boycotting it by everyone else.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:52 PM
6

Men get upwards of 40 years for the exact same crime. About 250 times the 60 days.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:48 PM
1

That's completely absurd. Do you have any evidence of that? I don't believe it for a second. Total nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 08:54 PM
1

"as most are not this way" Says who? And on what basis? You? On absolutely no basis? All your claims are totally fact-free, evidence-free, groundless and arbitrary statements. These might be your opinions, but absolutely not facts. And I totally disagree with every word. The facts are exactly as I said: Women cannot tolerate men supporting their won group, such as Men's Rights. They brutally and furiously attack any male group or organization. They shut down any male group, organization and move…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 02:52 AM
3

And a lot of women. Probably more than men. Exactly like those teachers. What are you talking about? Every year there are about the same number of "rape" (women) cases and "forced to penetrate" cases (men). Both are rapes. If you add prison rapes (95% of the prison population is male), including juvenile facilities, you get the every year more men are raped than women in the US. I have the data. As for non-rape, like molestation and harassment, the same goes. Just scroll through this subreddit t…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 02:36 AM
1

What they want it female supremacy with male enslavement. All the other "stages" and "phases" are are just distraction and bullshit on the way. What the wokes want is non-white supremacy with white slavery (or white extermination, it varies). What both share is the ultimate immorality of punishing innocent people for what they did NOT do. Slavery ended about 160 years ago. There is not a single black person alive who ever experienced slavery, and has not been one for many generations. Equally, t…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 02:12 AM
1

Bottom line: They are shameless with that "keep it in your pants", without the "keep your legs closed" part. Yes, it takes two to tango, whether you like it or not, it's 50-50, you know, we are doing "equality". As per feminism, you see. ONLY WOMEN HAVE REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS. Men have no reproductive rights, full stop. Period. End of discussion. Complete, absolute, total injustice, inequality and inequity. Put another way: Complete, absolute, total feminism. And that's all there is to it.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:54 AM
2

I say with shoot them with lesbian weddings. This video has a Chinese, a Russian and an American military recruitment video. The third one is the American one, "Emma has two Moms". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKjFyq938TA Yeah, that should do it. Feeling much safer already.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:42 AM
1

Bring in the professionals, I guess.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:37 AM
1

Somebody pointed out that "it's positive if it is against men. Get with the times". I am trying ... and I am learning... slowly but steadily ... getting clearer every day ...
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:35 AM
1

I am just such a slow learner. But I will try, I promise. "Negative = women don't like it." "Positive = is against men". I am getting there, slowly.... Thank you for helping out.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:31 AM
1

I am so sad to hear that. Yes it hurts and yes this is the opposite of equality. The very opposite. In my mind, feminists are now so entrenched in power in Australia (as Bettina's article shows with 70% or more in essentially all public service jobs) that they decided that they don't even need to worry about appearances. 100% quota sounds bad, but who cares? We are in power, you suck it up. That's their mentality. It is absolutely horrible. Australia has become such a sad country. Not that the o…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:27 AM
2

You are not wrong. One more step in the "right direction" towards the brave feminists utopia of female supremacy and male slavery. "Managers all women, workers all men" kind of says it. Right you are.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:21 AM
1

In history, Kings and male rulers were the most powerful people The reason for that was that "king", "emperor" and such were originally military ranks. In a feudal society the "king" was the number one of his knights (i.e. the commander of the army). Kings and emperors were primarily soldiers and were originally fighting in battles, leading their armies. Like Alexander the Great. Since soldiers were exclusively men, the rulers were essentially exclusively men (except when in some cases the lack …
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:18 AM
2

My impression is that if he doesn't "do something" in response to a woman's complaint, it can get publicized, bringing in bad PR for the company, and the company even can get sued (by the woman herself, or most likely, feminist activists around her). Then the CEO will get fired. Again, don't know the specific case and persons, just my impression of what can go through the had of such a callously behaving CEO.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:07 AM
1

There is a track record about "feminist construction". The "feminist bridge collapse" in Florida. Killed 6 people. https://thestatetimes.com/2018/03/30/female-headed-construction-and-the-collapse-of-fiu-bridge/
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:03 AM
2

Simp. Only feminists claim that hating feminism and hating women are the same thing. No, there are not. Absolutely not. There is also a problem with "caring about men's rights". Feminists didn't get where they are by "caring". No, they wage all-out war, by any means necessary, no holds barred, in full hatred and hate speech mode, just look at /r/MenKampf. They FIGHT. Not "care about". The sad conclusion is that you will get absolutely nowhere with your "gently caring" idea. You have to fight. Th…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:52 AM
12

Yes, it was a famous case. It was called "blind hiring". Government organizations had to hire people without knowing their gender and race. The "theory" was that this will increase the number of women and minorities hired, because the "theory" claimed that white men are not hired for their qualities and abilities but by "privilege" given to them by the "old white boys' club". Except that the exact opposite happened, white men got hired even more on a "blind hiring" basis, proving that the "old w…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:56 AM
10

But Turnbull is a man, right? That is the biggest problem with men. That so many can so easily go ahead and betray their gender, throwing all fellow men under the bus, just that a simp mangina gets some bone thrown to him, like some political office (and maybe some pussy, even though it is not very likely, women actually hate weak men and nothing screams "weak" louder than "feminist man"). Our real enemy are the feminists, but none more than the male feminists, the simps and white nights, that p…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:41 AM
2

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Twelve-month-sexual-victimization-prevalence-percentage-among-adult-population_fig1_262306031 Look at the longest (black = male victim) column at the far right: Juveniles, staff misconduct. All data are percentages. It shows how far more boys are raped in juvenile facilities than girls, with the perpetrators being overwhelmingly female guards. As found in the text: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262306031_The_Sexual_Victimization_of_Men_in_America_Ne…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:12 AM
2

Very true. Not just rape but also DV and many other statistics are intentionally not reported broken down by gender, by the authorities (like the CDC), while they are always meticulously broken down by race. They want to hide the truth about how horribly men are treated and are doing in this society, God forbid the truth came out. It would end the "narrative", holy cow, that should never be allowed to happen! So let's continue lying, that's their motto.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:04 AM
3

And America's, I am afraid. And it will, eventually, I worry. This cannot go on forever without ending in disaster, and the US losing a major war against China might be that disaster. I wish I was wrong but I don't see how. Everything in the West, including military power, is being undermined and subverted from the inside. By the woke and the feminists. China may not have to defeat the US - just wait for it to defeat itself and take over.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:55 AM
20

There is the infamous "feminist bridge collapse" in Florida. It killed 6 people. Until then it was hysterically celebrated as the "all female engineered" bridge and what a major breakthrough it was to have an all female engineering team. https://thestatetimes.com/2018/03/30/female-headed-construction-and-the-collapse-of-fiu-bridge/ After it collapsed, there were the even more hysterical denials by the feminist press that it wasn't really all-female, and it didn't really collapse, and it wasn't t…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:51 AM
10

Problem is, they often hang a whole lot of their fellow humans first.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:43 AM
13

I wonder if it's really "biological", though, and not just socialization and cultural imprinting. In which case it could be de-programmed (but could take a generation or more). The reason I am wondering is because just like you don't see toddlers being racist (they happily play along, not even noticing skin color differences), you don't see toddlers being sexist, either. In fact, boys prefer the company of boys and girls the company of girls (because they share what toys they prefer: girls dolls…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:43 AM
1

True that.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:31 AM
9

No, there are male teachers who rape girls. They are significantly fewer in numbers, primarily because only about 10% of the teaching force is male in K-12 education (where the students are minors). In the US, at least. There is also a high level of awareness among male teachers since #MeToo that they have to be very careful as they can be easily accused with zero or near-zero ability to defend themselves from false allegations. So they better watch out. There are more cases that are old but man…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:52 AM
1

So very true. What a toxic fascist that pathetic excuse for a living creature is. I literally feel physically sick looking at any of its farts on the internet, in social media, wherever. Replace the words "men" or "white men" with "Jews" in any of those and you get the Mein Kampf. How is that tolerated is beyond me. Also read /r/MenKampf Very educational.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:29 AM
3

Unfortunately I cannot help (no legal experience) but I am totally with you. You can DM me. I am sorry to hear this. Looks to me that men these days simply have to refuse to participate in any corporate "social event". The women can go and socialize with each other. Even welcoming new employees on their first day can be career ending. Like this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wkunsl/i_think_i_was_discriminated_at_work/ And the feminists have the nerve to complain that "men are refu…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:15 AM
5

I am so sorry to hear this. I am with you. There are endless numbers of this type of behavior by women reported in this Reddit. Endless. The way they behave is just barbaric. I hardly ever recall a man behaving that way. Like destroying the other person's property or home, or killing the other person in a "romantic" relationship. Or due to jealousy or because the other wants to break up. Really, I don't recall a single case of a man doing this. But endless number of women, just keep scrolling in…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:02 AM
3

They way they are getting her out of any trouble is unconscionable. She is a real danger to the community. Obviously zero moral compass, capable of murder, lies as naturally as she is breathing. And what if they give the children to her? She can get in a rage and give Drano to them, too. Or do something even more horrible to them. Obviously she has no conscience and is capable of murder. Capable of pretty much anything. "In the best interest of the children ..." Like this one? https://www.reddit…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:58 AM
6

“vehemently and unequivocally denies ever attempting to poison her husband or anyone else. As a well-respected physician her goal as always been to help people and never to harm them.” That is so rich. There are videos of her doing it. The "well respected physician". Some nerve, I tell ya.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:51 AM
16

They want it all. They want female supremacy. That's the real meaning of "it all" is...
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:42 AM
51

How could any discrimination ever be "positive" just beats me.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:41 AM
46

Haha. That's one way to do it ... I am wondering, what exactly would happen in real life if men started just en masse announcing that they are trans women? Already, in the US, 34% of white applicants to colleges change their race on their resumes to something else (often Native American). And get accepted. https://www.intelligent.com/34-of-white-college-students-lied-about-their-race-to-improve-chances-of-admission-financial-aid-benefits/
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:38 AM
5

:-) You are doing important work. Thank you and more power to you.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:34 AM
7

Joseph Goebbels would be proud. (Yes, the Nazi propaganda minister.)
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:12 AM
6

The cynicism: there is the body of a dead men in a coagulating pool of his blood, not a scratch on the woman. Lawyer reaction: "We look forward to clearing her name in court." How about she clears away the blood first? With her unscratched hands.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:08 AM
5

The fair sex.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:00 AM
4

In 71% of cases when children are killed by one parent alone, the mother is the murderer. 60% of the victims are boys. https://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php Anyone has a vague memory of the principle that "family courts give custody to mothers because they are better parents than fathers"? Interesting claim. And an interesting case to illustrate it.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 01:53 AM
3

I don't know what your word salad is supposed to mean but to me it doesn't make any sense. Anybody has a right to be selfish, narcissistic, cruel and uncaring, and caring only about themselves. They can identify whatever they want. And this includes feminists, who are all of the above. And they have a right, because everybody has a right to be an asshole. But that doesn't have anything to do with Janice's article. The problem comes when somebody's asshole-ness is raised to the level of law, regu…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 01:24 AM
2

Politicians should invite diverse opinions when discussing possible legislation Except that it is not a matter of "should". It is a matter of "you are breaking the law if you don't i.e. you are a criminal". In the US, technically, all public servants take an oath, from the President down, that includes "I swear that I uphold and protect the Constitution". Now, the US Constitution expressly bans discrimination on the basis of race, gender, religion, ethnic origin and other "i-cube" traits (inborn…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 01:04 AM
6

Also look a that picture in the Guardian, complete with the claim that "Research shows that 97% of young women have been sexually harassed in the UK." Got that? The feminists are telling you that with a serious face. 97% essentially means that all "young women" have been sexually harassed. Really. And just who could take this seriously? Other than feminists, of course. I would die to see that "research", especially their definition of "sexual harassment". And the data and their collection method…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:08 PM
7

Women have been physically and psychologically abused for millennia. And men equally. Like being a slave who is forced to go down in a mine or to row a galley, chained to the bank and driven by whips, are also physical and psychological abuse. Moreover: "A 2016 national study found more than a third of young people involved in the U.S. sex trade were boys and young men." https://www.wgbh.org/news/unseen-the-boy-victims-of-the-sex-trade-pt-1 Applies to other parts of the world, like "bacha bazi" …
/r/MensRights11/08/22 08:42 PM
12

No, there aren't. In Canada, Earl Silverman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Silverman tried to set one up, in his own house, around 2004. "But, in contrast to the hundreds of millions of dollars the Canadian government provides to women's shelters, this one-time $1,000 grant was a mere pittance. MASH hosted about 20 fleeing men and children in the first four months of 2013 before being shut down. With no public funds to help, Silverman funded the running costs and bills himself, failing to ra…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 07:57 PM
15

"we must teach our boys not to rape when really less 1% of men would do such a thing" Definitely less than 1%. On the other hand ... look at /r/teacherswhorape That's just in a very narrow segment, education.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 06:05 AM
161

This is so true and Janice Fiamengo (a leading woman MRA) is wonderful as always. The pettiness, narcissism and complete lack of self awareness - not to mention the complete lack of any compassion, empathy and just basic decency - of the feminists is astonishing. Here are their pressing issues: Catcalls! Men looking at women ("staring")! Down-blousing! The end of the world, undoubtedly, all of them. But men's issues: suicide, dying 6 years younger than women, being in much worse health with almo…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 05:56 AM
1

I actually got a deep revelation the other day. My wife dared to disagree with an article, written in the Wall Street Journal, about the "gender pay gap". She pointed out (we discussed this a lot before) that it is an earnings gap, not a "wage gap" nor a "pay gap". Despite companies paying the exact same money for the same job, with the same qualifications, for the same hour (doing otherwise would be violating anti-discrimination laws), men still earn more. But it's simply because they work that…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 05:34 AM
4

"supporting a group that you do not belong to is frowned upon by many" Funny, you saying that. Because the last time I checked, women very clearly expect that men support them, even though they don't belong to the group of women. They don't "frown" upon men supporting women, they outright demand it. Latest example: "Men, we demand that you support us with abortion and Roe v Wade!" After loudly saying for decades that, you know, "no uterus, no opinion". What is frowned upon is if men dare to supp…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 05:07 AM
5

I am certain feminists distorted an original old saying to suit their agenda. Truth replaced by lie, what's new, so feminist.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:51 AM
2

As if a dad is not judged the exact same way if he appears in public with a kid under the same circumstances (dirty clothes and whatnot). Dads get all this while moms rarely ever get the judged by "not providing for the family" which is expected only from men (as the child support system shows). If the kid is not provided for, the dad is judged automatically not the mom. It is also insane that "providing for the family" (which takes a full job and thereby a full life) is somehow the same level b…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:49 AM
2

The term oppression (and injustice and discrimination) comes to mind. (To mine, anyway.)
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:43 AM
5

yet one alleged complaint comes up and he's not given the benefit of the doubt I think I understand that. The CEO himself is so intimidated by and afraid of their own female employees that he feels he has no other choice than to cave in to their demands not matter how insane, or else he himself will lose his job. Oppression probably never was this complete. Great way to run a company, BTW. It will go broke soon.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:40 AM
2

My question is for what purpose, exactly? More importantly, why Andrew Tate, exactly? Why not the endless number of heroic men who save lives, unlike Andrew Tate? What exactly does Andrew Tate have to do with men's rights? If I accept that he is a mentally disturbed toxic person, and a suitable caricature of "misogyny", why does such a person need to be brought in to a Men's Rights subreddit? Other than trying to deviously "prove" and imply that the subreddit is like Tate and thus "toxic" and "m…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 09:50 PM
1

What does it matter whether I personally went there or not ?These are the facts about Australian schools and that specific school. Or are you saying that I can point out the truth only about the one school I went to? Good luck telling that to me, mate.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 09:35 PM
13

I've never seen a more outrageous case of guilty until proven innocent. This goes beyond that. This is guilty until proven innocent combined with being prevented from proving innocence. "smile, be polite, but say nothing." I am not sure that even that works. She can get pissed of by you not replying to her sexual urges simply by ignoring her. I read a case when she went with the accusation of 'unnecessary cruelty" with the cruelty being that she was ignored and not replied to. Still, your sugges…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 09:27 PM
6

It's unconscionable that the CEO didn't say one word about what "behavior" was "out of order" and in what way. What wrong did you do? Apparently, these days men have to have a constantly running voice recorder / bodycam on them. If you had recorded what the "new joiner" said and what the CEO said, you could have just given the recordings to a good lawyer and the first time they find about them would be from the lawyer's letter / lawsuit. Lawsuit about unlawful dismissal and discrimination. I wou…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 09:09 PM
1

That's because feminism has a single message: "Men bad, women good. Bad man oppresses good woman." This message is used as an extortion tool to extort more and more privileges for women at the expense of (and to be paid by) men. Until they reach their final goal, complete female supremacy. In other words, feminism is a political hate movement that aims at a biology-based supremacist state. As such, it is a fascist movement. Of course, all their claims are lies. Not all women are good and not all…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 08:15 PM
12

Be careful, gentlemen. Comments that approve Tate can be used as screenshots to try to shut down this subreddit. In my view Tate causes damage to men's rights because he tarnishes men's reputation by being the caricature of what feminist consider the "toxic" and "misogynous" man. They never ask "how do you guys feel about" these men: https://www.foxla.com/news/california-man-sacrifices-himself-in-zip-line-fall-in-heroic-attempt-to-save-woman-friend-says [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 08:01 PM
1

Be careful, gentlemen. I have the suspicion that this poster's goal is to elicit comments that approve Tate and then use the screenshots to try to shut down this subreddit. In my view Tate causes damage to men's rights because he tarnishes men's reputation by being the caricature of what feminist consider the "toxic" and "misogynous" man. They never ask "what you do you guys feel about" these guys: https://www.foxla.com/news/california-man-sacrifices-himself-in-zip-line-fall-in-heroic-attempt-to…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 07:52 PM
13

He is saying that Tate is not mean and uncaring, he just says the truth to women. Of course to the kind of women we have these days (the majority of them, anyway), telling women the truth they don't like is "mean and uncaring". Because they are so entitled. Meanwhile, as he pointed out, women are really mean and uncaring to men, with abandon, and don't even notice it. To them, "nice and caring" means repeating lies to them that they want to hear. I say, f*ck that. I am not impressed by Tate, he …
/r/MensRights10/08/22 07:33 PM
2

Toxic = dares to say the truth instead of feminist lies. "Dangerous" - to whom? To the truth deniers. Because it punctures their lies with the truth. Horrible, the feminist "movement". Pure fascism, that's all there is to it.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 08:08 AM
1

"During a whole school assembly at Brauer College in Victoria, Australia, all male students were told to stand up, turn to a girl in their class and say sorry." https://news.sky.com/story/schoolboys-made-to-apologise-for-stuff-we-didnt-do-during-assembly-about-sexual-assault-12260783
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:12 PM
1

Er ... so what is your explanation for the statistics? I am dying to hear it.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:06 PM
1

I truly hope you are right but I am not so sure about the "easily" part. The infamous "Ministry of Gender Equality and Family" (in plain English the Ministry of Feminism and Misandry) is still there, although there is talk about abolishing / changing it. That was one of the biggest election promises of the new president. But there are no definite dates and I have a feeling it will be "changing", not "abolishing". Which can easily amount to nothing except window dressing. Meanwhile the new presid…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:03 PM
1

You have a point about doom-scrolling but I am past it. I have been a MGTOW for years and have thought about and analyzed this society for what it is, for a long time, among others, from a gender perspective. My analysis is unequivocal: we live and a gender feudal society with women as the new ruling class who behave accordingly. Including having essential immunity for committing any crime against men and boys, including murder and torture, bullying, rape and sexual assault. With basically no co…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 10:48 PM
5

How come a man is never arrested for a "sexual relationship". Or "having sex with". Or "being seduced by the minor". Men get ever arrested for RAPE. So let's chant together about this woman: RAPIST, RAPIST, RAPIST. Say it loud, say it often, say it forever.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 10:36 PM
2

To those people (feminists and the women who believe them) the truth is always "controversial". They tolerate only their lies being repeated endlessly. They are anti-truth people.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 10:31 PM
1

Distorter. Look again, I never said 'majority" I sad "a lot of". This type of intentional distortion and lying is typical of feminists (which probably includes you). And I said "a lot of" because under normal circumstances when people have unprotected sex they are not very likely to go in with "hey, let's make an abortion, honey". It is either trying to make a baby or some extreme form of ignorance or recklessness because it is hard to imagine that people who are old enough to have sex (under no…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 10:25 PM
2

It is called ruling class privilege. A noble gets nothing or next to nothing for killing a peasant. But when a peasant kills a noble ... you can imagine. We live in gender feudalism, likely moving towards gender-based slavery.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:59 PM
1

Right you are. Plain as day.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:47 PM
2

Forget about "feelings". Men are the victims of most violent crimes. Even Wikipedia admits that men are the victims of three quarters of homicides (74.9%). Also that police violence overwhelmingly targets men (about 94% of the cases). So women are roughly 3 times safer walking down a street than men. And then look at all the hysteria about women not feeling safe. Yes, they are not feeling safe (even though they are 3 times safer than men), while men are not safe. That's the main difference betwe…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 08:28 AM
1

The entire Hollywood industry is in the business of normalizing the killing, torture and rape of men and boys by women, so that they won't be considered crimes at all, and that women can do any damn thing they want to men and boys with complete impunity. Only men die gory deaths in movies, never women. The preferred scenario is women killing or torturing and killing men, the gorier the better. Women kicking men in the groin is standard "joke". Raping underage boys and raping men by women is the …
/r/MensRights09/08/22 08:12 AM
1

It is worth following this case. I have a strong feeling she will avoid even the 60 days in jail. Will be "changed" to probation or community service. That's what typically happens. Meanwhile men get decades of prison for the same crime.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 08:00 AM
1

They behave like the ruling class they are. They can do any damn thing they want without any consequences and with complete disregard to how much suffering their behaviour may cause to men and boys. If there are implications of their own mistakes that they don't like then they blame men for it and punish men further. It is called ruling class privilege.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:57 AM
2

I believe the main reason they push for circumcision is that they make money from selling the foreskin of male babies to turn them into cosmetics that women put on their faces. Sandra Bullock calls it the 'Penis Facial' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwO3TEj9-5g
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:53 AM
2

"Demonstrably"? Where is your "demonstration" that this is false? I am dying to see it.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:44 AM
6

Women are the new ruling class that can do anything they want with impunity to the underclass (men). This includes bullying, torture, sexual attack, rape and murder and extends to doing these things to underage boys. They get "probation" or nothing for crimes men can get decades in jail for. Endless number of cases reported on this subreddit. Also look at /r/teacherswhorape .
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:40 AM
8

They will let her out with "probation" or nothing at all. No consequences for driving her husband to his death. I wonder how this would fit in the Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:33 AM
43

Men bad, women good. Incel bad, femcel good. This Laura Bates is a particularly bad one, but the whole Guardian is a terrible femcel cesspool. Absolutely not worth paying attention to.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:29 AM
25

They don't allow men to be among themselves without female supervision because they are afraid / paranoid about men finding out how badly treated they are and of men "conspiring" to change that. They want to prevent any collective action men might take.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:24 AM
7

There is no "gender pay gap". There is an earnings gap, due to men working more than 2 weeks longer per year than women, and due to the fact that men do most of the highly complex, stressful, physically demanding, dangerous and dirty jobs that pay more than air-conditioned, short work week, flexible hours office jobs that women prefer. The earnings gap is entirely due to choices women make.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:22 AM
7

Exactly. "Keep it in your pants", say they. How about "Keep your legs closed"? Never heard that from a feminist. It is absurd, of course. A lot of abortions happen because a woman just changes her mind. So when they had sex, it was she wanting a baby. Now all of a sudden, not any more. How the f*ck is a man responsible for some female changing her mind? It should be him to get financial payments from her for the stress an emotional suffering she caused to the man so inconsiderately. How immoral,…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 01:28 AM
3

Ignorance is not possible. OK, so you don't read the news. But if you live in London and use the tube, gigantic posters look down on you threatening men for the crime of simply looking at women (called "staring".). Or that "it is not her who sends death threats", as if men do that (apart from a minimal number of the mentally sick, men and women). That's in the country where a woman just killed in cold blood a man who was 3 years younger than her, for absolutely nothing, and got "300 hours of com…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 01:19 AM
1

"In the UK women have the right to kill men now!" That is the absolute truth. In the US, Australia and many other western countries as well. Women are the new ruling class with essentially impunity to do whatever they want to men, including murder and rape, and murder and rape of underage boys, too. The brave new world called feminism. Fascism would be a more accurate name.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 01:06 AM
1

This is completely fucking anecdotal! I can count more instances of a male teacher snapping... ... it's just my personal experience. The laugh of the century!!!
/r/MensRights09/08/22 12:56 AM
1

Gaslighter.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 12:51 AM
1

The essence is that man EARN more because they work a lot more hours per year than women. In addition, they do all the hard, heavy, dangerous and dirty jobs that pay more than being a receptionist in an air-conditioned office with flexible hours. The "gender pay gap" is a myth and a lie, designed to hide the "hours worked" gap and the "nature of work" gap. It was made up for propaganda purposes so that they can demand that women get paid more than men for working less in easier jobs than men.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 08:15 PM
12

more about her future than the young man she killed May I say that this is the understatement of the century? The judge cared absolutely nothing about him and his life. He is simply not a factor in this, beyond "yeah, he is dead, I can't change that". See the cynicism? How about passing a harsh sentence as a deterrent to prevent this from happening again? That didn't even cross the judge's mind. Because the judge doesn't care one bit. Note "less", but "not at all".
/r/MensRights08/08/22 08:08 PM
1

You asked a question and I answered.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:56 PM
2

Unfortunately for them it does make them sound absolutely insane Regrettably, it's not what they "sound" matters but the fact that sooner or later these things will be made into law. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11025857/Republicans-launch-bill-require-fathers-pay-child-support-unborn-babies.html
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:54 PM
16

Women are the new ruling class and as such have complete immunity for any crime committed against members of the lower class. Literally: women can murder men without essentially any consequences, i.e. with essentially full immunity. Note the curious sequence of events: "the murder ... charge was changed to one of causing death by dangerous driving ... this was replaced with a charge of causing death by careless driving." Changed by whom and on what basis? Note also that she did it because it was…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:51 PM
13

Women are the new ruling class and members of the lower class are not entitled to the respect that is demanded for the members of the ruling class.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:40 PM
7

Women are the new ruling class and members of a ruling class are always exempt from punishments that the lower class gets for the same crimes.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:38 PM
3

Rapist, rapist, rapist. Say it. Say it loud. Say it often. Say it forever.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:37 PM
2

Can he go back to college? If not, the university should be sued.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:35 PM
0

Stopping the insane discrimination, double standarding and oppression of boys and men would be a good start. Did it even dawn on you that with all that talk about "women's reproductive rights", ONLY women have any reproductive rights, men have zero? How about parenting rights? There is an insane amount of discrimination, hate and injustice in this society that lead to all the well known statistics: men are 99% of combat deaths, 94% of workplace deaths, 95% of the homeless (with zero men-only she…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:53 AM
1

I have been a MGTOW for years. It is a step but not enough. First, it is a mistake that it has a name, even an abbreviation. It will be erased just because of that. Look what they did to the MGTOW subreddits or the mgtow.com website (used to be functional with rich content). Second, they will still tax you and give your money to feminist organizations and for women's benefits in general. Nothing you can do about it. If you have a job, you still likely have to interact with women at work, includi…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:28 AM
3

"He said she has had an extremely traumatic start in life..." Not that crap again. Every single time a woman commits some heinous crime, like this one, the first thing people do is to go on about "it's not really her fault because she had such a difficult this or that (childhood, mental state, emotional trouble, fill in the blank)". NEVER HAPPENS when it comes to a man. Woman rapes boy? "I can see she is depressed" (said a female judge in one case, reported here on Reddit). Yes, the woman had be…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:15 AM
2

Despicable beyond words. People who design these kinds of things are sadists and perverts. Shame on any store that carries this kind of crap.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:00 AM
1

Australian Human Rights Commission I heard a lot about this horrible, despicable, human rights-violating and thereby crimes-against-humanity perpetrating institution from the excellent Bettina Arndt, one of my heroes. Eternal shame for Australia, one of the many.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:57 AM
1

please don't advocate suicide Please enlighten me what else to advocate. "even if the world were to improve, you would not be there to enjoy it" Any hint, sign, probability, however remote, that the world would improve for men? Any at all? Exactly. And even if it were, wouldn't that be like 200 or 300 years from now? We still wouldn't be there to "enjoy it", would we? Please don't give OP false hope. What I am advocating is suffering reduction / avoidance. What's the point of suffering in this s…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:50 AM
46

More women are married to men who are older than them, primarily for money. Hence the statistics.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:03 AM
1

Record and document everything and file for a divorce.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:02 AM
7

Is this legal in Australia? How come? If I am correct this is illegal in the US and any employer who did this would be sued.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:00 AM
1

You are changing the topic. Yes, tax contribution rates can be analyzed by socio-economic class, too: which income bracket pays how much. High income pays much, low income pays little. But they can also be analyzed by gender: which gender pays how much. Men pay much (net positive), women pay little (net negative). The two are independently true. "Intersectionally" this means that rich men give overwhelmingly much and poor women take overwhelmingly much. No contradiction between the two analyses.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:56 AM
1

I know I may get a lot of hate and downvote for this but this is my opinion. I advocate suicide and that's what I am planning for myself, to be done soon. I think large numbers of suicides by men are the only form of protest they will ever hear. Especially when they start seriously affecting population numbers and the economy, Meanwhile we have nothing to lose as we just suffer in their f*cked up gynocentric, misandrist feminist system, what is the point. This is not a life. Why suffer, doesn't …
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:55 PM
1

I have no idea what "false information" you are talking about, but whatever.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:21 PM
31

Tbf, a lot of the male-dominated professions tend to earn more The main reason for those fields being male dominated (for now, fewer and fewer fields are) is that most high paying jobs are complex, demanding, stressful or physically back-breaking professions and women generally avoid them. Statistically, women prefer air-conditioned office jobs with flexible hours even when those pay less. This has very little to do with "equality" and a lot with "choices made".
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:18 PM
8

Reading comprehension problem, much? I clearly said that women who have a husband, male partner or boyfriend who financially support them (i.e. pay the bills for them) have the option of staying at home and not working. Technically men could rely on a rich working wife and not work, but we talk statistics here, and that is very rare. Huge numbers of women are stay at home mums and housewives or work part time because they are financially supported by a man and very few men are in that position. …
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:11 PM
4

The biggest difference is that for many women employment is optional. More women work part time because their husbands, partners or boyfriends work full time and support them financially. Same for full time. Women can choose to be stay at home mums or housewives. No such thing exist, or ever existed, for men. OP's issue is that as a man he must work but they institute (illegal and discriminatory, BTW) quotas for women who have other options unlike him. They also net tax men more, and men are hug…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 10:45 PM
4

May I ask you not to play dumb? This subreddit is full of these kinds of stories including huge numbers of them with men reporting it, only to be laughed at, blamed for it, told that he deserved it, mocked, called gay or outright arrested by the police. The police specifically have orders to always arrest the man in case of any DV, completely independent of any facts. Don't tell me this is news for you because I won't believe it.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:28 AM
2

I think an important part of the reason is that feminists (and most women who tacitly support them for the benefits) don't want to tolerate any men-only places is the fear / paranoia that any such place would be a "breeding ground" for men conspiring against the feminist power grab and against female privileges. They also feel jealous and excluded when they see any men-only space, while not giving a damn about how men feel excluded from women-only spaces. That doesn't matter, you see. But it's m…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter