TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Stunning-Try9757 Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by Stunning-Try9757 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

I think it’s the fact that it seem as if they are trying to take advantage of women who are in a less fortunate position and it can lead to financial abuse or other types of abuse/control. It’s giving “buying a woman” vibes. And the “low valued undesirable men” most likely have personality traits that are undesirable with many red flags and not just based on looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:11 AM
1

But if there were two hot women, one with a child and one without, which one do you think they would choose to date? It’s not that they can’t remarry a hvm. It’s just that hvm usually have options. And if two women are equally attractive, have equal chemistry, similar intelligence, similar educational background, similar income, good morals ect, but one has children and the other doesn’t; they are most likely gonna choose the women without kids. I’m sure they would wanna start their own family a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 01:33 AM
1

What makes you think these intelegent and financial stable women would even give these type of men the time of day? LOL. They don’t. Why would it benefit a woman to be with a broke looser? Absolutely nothing. Even if these men were to pursued career oriented women, they would get rejected because they are out of his league. Because he is a “looser”.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 12:02 PM
1

No, the women are not broke since she’s focused on her career. We’re comparing “career-oriented women” and “30+ year old guys I know with a younger girlfriend… not established in their careers”. This is what OP stated and comparing. A woman who has a career is obviously hard working, focused, financially stable, mature enough to keep a job and think about her future. While the man is just “coasting on looks/vibes” and still “bartending and partying”. Why would a woman want to have kids with a br…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:13 AM
1

“What benefit does it serve a man” LOL. The real question is, what benefit does it serve a woman to be with an immature, broke, man child? Nothing, absolutely nothing. It’s just a drain of her time, energy and finances. Women aren’t being “harsh” for having standards. That’s such an incel thing to say. You just made my point. Intelligent, financially stable women won’t date these “loosers”, therefore these “loosers” have to go after easily impressed, naive younger girls. Edit. You say “a woman w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:23 PM
1

Well thats just sad. lol That might be chill for a college kid and thats totally fine and understandable. But it’s pretty pathetic for a 40year old. An educated, intelligent, financially stable woman with good friends and family would 100% think those men are loosers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 09:46 AM
3

It’s not that they are automatically a “looser” for dating younger women. It’s just that those men tend to have the same maturity level, financial status, career experience, as the young girls; and that’s what makes them a “looser”. If you’re a 37 year old man with the same living standard and financial situation as someone in their early 20s, quite frankly that is kinda sad. And those men aren’t dating younger women because they are focused in their carriers or to better themselves. It’s becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 02:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter