TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SuchPowerfulAlly Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by SuchPowerfulAlly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Ok, you want quotes of Farrell saying bad shit? I'll give you quotes. For right now, I'm literally running out the door, so I'll just give you the first quote of his that I remember being bad, then I can give you some more by the end of the day. If a man ignoring a woman's verbal "no" is committing date rape, then a woman who says "no" with her verbal language but "yes" with her body language is committing date fraud. And a woman who continues to be sexual even after she says "no" is committing …
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:41 PM
0

Yeah, I remember reading about that at the time. Here's the key word though: meetings. Not disciplinary action. Meetings where they were told that there were accusations and they should cut that shit out if they were doing it. You might note that's a remarkably lax, wink-wink-nudge-nudge sort of way to deal with these sorts of accusations. EDIT: Wait I was thinking of something else, one second. EDIT: Leaving my original post up for clarity. I got confused because of something else that happened…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:23 AM
-2

Pointing it out by falsely accusing people of rape, while also making it even harder for male victims to speak up. Good job with that. How exactly was the system sexist? It was set up so that anyone, male or female, could report their rapes. Given that most survivors (especially men) don't report being raped because of stigma, you'd think you'd be behind that. Hell, you all act like it was set up to punish rapists. It wasn't. No police or disciplinary action could come of it, it was for statisti…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:25 AM
-2

Yeah. For a movement that apparently cares so much about false accusations, a lot of you guys seemed pretty quick to use them for your own ends.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:28 PM
2

I remember the thread in this sub when it happened. A LOT of people here were taking part proudly, it was only later that people realized "oh shit, this looks bad" and started blaming /b/ EDIT: In fact, here's a screenshot of that thread.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 12:05 PM
5

Alright, I think it's about time for you to GTFO.
/r/ExRedPill11/06/14 07:50 PM
12

Dude, it's like 3 paragraphs and a couple other assorted sentences, just read the damn thing.
/r/ExRedPill11/06/14 06:58 PM
1

God, I thought you MRAs were supposed to be logical. Put away your hate boner for just a second and actually look at the situation here.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:00 PM
1

At last update, she's working on 3 videos simultaneously, which explains the longer wait. She's 2 years over goal because the scope of this project expanded just a smidge. She originally promised 5 videos, each of which was on a smaller scale than the one's we've been getting, then changed that when she got such a massive amount of money. Now she's planning to release twelve parts, not twelve videos; the first 3 videos released were collectively part 1. Given the massively increased scope of the…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:07 AM
1

Also, it wouldn't be much of a relationship without mutual respect and attraction. . If you've got it figured out, then you are exactly the type of person who should be responding to posts in /askTRP These two things are incompatible to me because from what I've seen, TRP relationships are founded on treating the woman like a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/13 08:19 PM
2

You've given me a lot of food for thought as well, thank you. Good discussion :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/13 02:45 AM
2

Can I get an actual response?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/13 02:09 AM
1

Honestly? I can also link a rude amount of studies about children with an inconsistent father presence. So sorry, but in this case I 100% disagree with you. It's selfish and ignorant to punish the child because the father didn't pay. I absolutely recognize that it would be incredibly frustrating, but I also don't think that your children should ever be privy to your financial issues if it can be avoided. In those cases the child is fully aware that they are not seeing their father, and it's beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/13 02:08 AM
2

And what TRP doesn't accept is that no gender is a monolith. Some women might find the alpha shit attractive, some might not. The thing that annoys me is when people from TRP treat the alpha preference as the thing that all (or very close to all) women obviously find the most attractive, but that might be veering too far off topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/13 01:47 AM
2

fhqwhgads didn't want to give out information on their own relationship (reasonably so, IMO), but I have no problem sharing info about mine. My GF and I have been together a bit over 3 and a half years (4 in February) we have a relationship grounded on mutual respect and attraction, and we are monogamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/13 01:42 AM
1

So if the man said "I want nothing to do with this child" and vetos parental rights he's still expected to pay for a child he decided he didn't want. But if he did want a child, and the woman he impregnated didn't, and choose to abort, that's okay. But when he doesn't want a child it doesn't matter. At all. Yes. Because the child he helped create still still exists and still needs support. The only reason - the only reason- it's ok for the mother to "veto parental rights" (though it's obviously …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/13 01:04 AM
1

So in the same vein of reasoning for me, why should the man's right to choose whether or not he wants to be a father become null and void by her choice? Ideally the parents would come to some understanding but in the end because his choice has nothing to do with whether or not a human being will be growing inside him. If our hypothetical woman wanted to keep the baby and the man said "Well, I don't want a child," what does he get? Too freaking bad, bud! Time to pony up. How's that fair? Because …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/13 03:02 AM
8

I don't think you're nuts. I think you have very misguided views on gender, and it really bugs me that you're willing to base such a massive generalization of half the population on those you've personally experienced. Has confirmation bias never occurred to you? Have you never thought that maybe you only get into relationships with women who are ok with the RP stuff because women who aren't want you to just go away?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/13 05:58 PM
8

I think CrackheadHamster is talking about your attitude, as if society expect women to be submissive because women are submissive, rather than some women being submissive because society expects it. You're treating the status quo like it's biologically mandated, which is something RP in general does that drives me up a wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/13 05:55 PM
9

See, this is the shit that we Bluepillers take offense to, and I hope I wouldn't have to explain why.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/13 05:49 PM
2

Yes, what I'm proposing is that the man or woman would have a period where they could give up rights and responsibilities. I really don't think that's fair to the child. Say the father backs out as soon as the mother finds out she's pregnant and the mother chooses to give birth (bodily autonomy, etc). That child is left with only one parent to support them through no fault of their own. When I said that a child is entitled to the support of both parents, I didn't just mean legally, I meant moral…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/13 01:32 AM
2

The issue then is the rights of the child, which is why child support exists at all. If the child is carried to term and both parents are alive, that child is entitled to the support of both parents. Maybe if there was a system in place where the state would pick up the slack whenever one parent isn't supporting a given child (either because they're dead or they've surrendered their rights), and we could be sure that that support would not be lacking, then it would be ok. But that's entirely an …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/13 08:13 PM
2

I'm getting to this thread way late, but I only just discovered PPD from TBP. The term "toxic masculinity" seems pretty misunderstood in this thread. What it means is basically exactly what you described: a certain narrow definition of masculinity is pushed by society to the exclusion of all others, and this is toxic for everyone involved for the reasons you mentioned. It doesn't go much farther than that, really, as far as I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/13 07:54 PM
2

I made this same reply to the person you made this comment in response to, but I'm curious what you think of it: A woman's right to abort doesn't come from it being ok to give up on being a parent, it comes from the right to not have a living being growing inside you if you don't want to. Men have no analogous right to abortion because it isn't a bodily autonomy issue for them as it is for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/13 07:45 PM
1

A woman's right to abort doesn't come from it being ok to give up on being a parent, it comes from the right to not have a living being growing inside you if you don't want to. Men have no analogous right to abortion because it isn't a bodily autonomy issue for them as it is for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/13 07:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter