TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sufficient-Meal-5077 Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by Sufficient-Meal-5077 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm laughing at TRP and Incel culture because its pathetic, you've not made a single coherent point about why N count actually matters in LTR's and I suppose it's my own fault for thinking someone who follows TRP culture would be able to. I'm not interested in silence because its too amusing to hear the pointless rhetoric, I haven't destroyed anything either. You've done what all Red Pillers do when they can no longer focus on the bulk of the argument at hand, and just chosen 1 or 2 phrases to r…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 07:11 PM
0

Sorry, did you forget where you said this... Laughing about this? Insinuates that it isn't serious. And why wouldn't it be serious? Because you don't want it to be. Because if it was serious, then you aren't giving it any due. Which would make you cruel and uncaring. So it's funny. It has to be....fuck men i guess. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Good luck out there in the loneliness epidemic, yeah fuck chronically single men 🤣 The best bit about TRP is the fact that incels biggest bullies are the people making money off …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:41 PM
0

The likelihood that a woman I date has gone out with a guy who's "better" than me in one of those metrics rises with the more men she's chosen, AS she's likely to choose ONLY from the best. So you're insecure about a woman's previous partners? Sure we'd concede this. The argument is that women "fall" emotionally for the men who pump & dump If by fall you mean have one night stands with? Like if they meet them at a club etc. I can't say I've ever met a woman who truly believes that a ONS is going…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:14 PM
0

Except he's wrong, if sex is the same no matter who you sleep with, then why sleep with anyone at all It's not. Some people are more athletic and objectively more attractive. Some men have waaay more status. So sex with certain people does hit different based on whether or not you view their long potential more seriously? With the less attractive guy they were just fucking around, with the high status guy they see a something more long term? You claim this CANNOT be true. I claim it certainly mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 01:34 PM
1

No, that's my point, there is no other research on this from any kind of reputable source, just because its the best information you have available that does not make it good information. Until more studies are done that can reflect similar findings, this is not a useful source. As for someone replicating the information themselves, you'd just see it as anecdotal so it wouldn't benefit anyone in anyway. This is the fundamental issue with the majority of Social studies, if you find any evidence t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 12:37 PM
3

Except he's wrong, if sex is the same no matter who you sleep with, then why sleep with anyone at all when your right hand (barring any horrific accident) will always be there for you. He's claiming that someone who sleeps with a lot of people will not be satisfied by a partner they have real romantic interest in any more than some random stranger. It's a very disingenuous and cynical take on relationships as a whole. If he's breaking it down purely to sexual pleasure then should you also avoid …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 07:30 AM
1

No, that's not what I said, I said 10% of the population you're studying, not 10%of the entire population, i also said this goes down dependant on the size of the population you're studying. For a study based on the huge quantity of people and with the number of differing variables that this particular one is looking at you'd need a much bigger sample size in order to have any kind of accuracy. No individual study is ever taken as the gospel truth, that's why people re create them to attempt to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:13 AM
2

Right, but statistics based on a subject with far too many variables to allow for any kind of accuracy. 63% of men considered themselves single, were they in (i fucking hate this term) "situationships" that they weren't willing to declare as LTR's. Were they actually struggling to date or just in-between women? In fact only 15% of single men between 18 and 30 claimed they were actively looking for a relationship, does this mean that 48% are single by choice? My main gripe with this study is how …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:39 PM
-2

No, in regards to this particular study it absolutely is about sampling and the fundamental differences in different groups of people from different backgrounds. Do you believe this study is an accurate representation of dating in both Los Angeles and Jackson, Wyoming?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:17 PM
-1

Just because one gender has it easier than the other that doesn't mean it's actually difficult... Going for a piss is generally easier/less time consuming than taking a shit but at the same time you shouldn't be struggling to shit, unless you're having some issues. I'm saying that the lived experiences of some men should not necessarily effect the behaviour of all women, in the same way that the lived experience of some women should not effect the behaviour all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:13 PM
-2

Apologies I forgot go to write a full thesis, on the detailed analysis of a study used incorrectly by incels to solidify their misogyny and solicit empathy for a position they've largely put themselves in, on a reddit comment. Next time I'll make sure to include all of my arguments as to why a single study that's used as an accurate representation on an entire population that includes 44 Million people may not actually be as accurate as TRP assumes. 400,000 was an example of a sample size that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:09 PM
-6

Actually if you wanted an accurate depiction of the population you'd need about 400,000 men in order to get a solid grasp and those men would have to come from different socio economic backgrounds. You can't just ask 8,000 men that respond to their emails and say that's an accurate sample of the men between 18 and 30 in the USA. It's certainly a good start but these results would have to be recreated a few times from different regions in the USA in order to be able to say its in any way accurate…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:59 PM
2

Actually the ideal percentage for a sample size is approximately 10% of the population you plan on testing, as populations get larger this percentage can go down but should not be lower than 1% if you want any kind of accuracy in your study, the problem is that there 44.9Million males between the age of 18 and 30 in the US, trying to get an accurate understanding of the average dating life of this population is pretty much impossible. I'd agree that 8,000 would be a great number if you could get…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:54 PM
3

So the best orgasm of your life was the first time you choked the chicken?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 12:43 PM
1

Yeah, due to the Internet the smallest groups are able to make the most noise. Its really funny when men talk about how hard dating is, or when they believe there's some secret hack to get into the mind of women in order to become "Chad" and get revenge 🤣🤣 they truly believe the majority of men are struggling to get attention because of OKCupid matching studies and the "80/20 rule".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 12:34 PM
6

This is normally the study they're referring to, it had a sample size of about 8,000 people but apparently it gives an accurate indication of a country with over 340 Million... https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 12:23 PM
1

So if she's banging "Chads" every night off tinder why would that impact your future relationship with her if she's starting to take life more seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 11:51 AM
2

Okay, but a woman's relationship history is a much better indicator of that than her number of sexual partners, if she has been going out and having ONS's for fun whilst single is not a good way to judge what she is like when in an actual relationship. What about someone having fun in their early 20's is actually problematic when they start to look at things more long term and serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 11:22 AM
1

That isn't all I said, but yes what else is there except fear of being cheated on or retrospective jealousy? All you did was say it's not that, you provided no explanation as to why else it would matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 11:14 AM
7

Oof, bad time for a typo... totally get what you're saying but an edit is in order.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 06:08 AM
6

I would prefer someone with a string of ONS than someone who has a string of 2-3 month long relationships. So if their count is 6 but that's because once a year they have a 2 month long relationship I think that tells you a lot more about what you're getting into, if their count is 50 but they've been able to maintain a 5 year long relationship and only had ONS's either side of it I think it would probably work better long term. The success of a relationship is determined more by day to day beha…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 05:50 AM
20

Women are sluts because they don't sleep with him, they fuck 'Chad' so deserve to be insulted. If they fuck him then they're just intelligent because he's the kind of guy to treat them right long term, he definitely doesn't give off red flags, he's just a really nice guy they're all missing out on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 05:25 AM
3

Who determines a woman's sexual marketplace value? Who decides where they rank on the scale of 1 to 10?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:52 PM
3

Cue the rephrasing of dating market because it doesn't fit the current OP's argument in 3, 2, 1...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:51 PM
6

That's not true, the survey was in reference to number of sexual partners and frequency of sex in the past year, not whether or not those men were still virgins. Your particular 27% was also for the age range of 18-24 not under 30, the last point on this is the fact that the sample size was 4291 Men and 5213 Women which may not be an accurate representation of a country with over 340 Million people in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 11:08 AM
22

Jeffrey Dahmer had a fanclub, so I don't think it's a stretch to say there are freaks out there who celebrate all acts of depravity and if he'dcommitted his crimes in the age of social media you would have noticed them far more. As for her sentance the general public always believe people should serve longer times than they actually do, very few people are satisfied with court rulings for pretty much all crimes that don't result in a life sentance. A good example is a guy in my local area, he br…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:40 AM
–

Yes, unless you are intentionally not finishing for some reason or are physically/mentally unable to, your partner is doing something wrong. If you're focusing on yourself, then you're doing it wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 11:03 AM
–

I've never had a passive partner, either that's dumb luck or maybe I've only had sex with people who actually wanted to fuck me and I've always made sure to make the bedroom a place to get excited about, lots of foreplay and preparation going both ways. With your example I'd say you have more issues than just who reaches climax, it sounds like neither one of you are too interested and you'd be better off just going into separate rooms and sorting yourselves out. If sex for you is so boring, it s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 07:27 AM
4

Sex is a team game, not a competition. Focus on your partners pleasure, and you'll get yours. Women aren't a puzzle waiting to be solved. It isn't complicated to be good in bed it just takes a bit of effort. If your partner isn't reaching orgasm there's only one person to blame, and if you've finished, it isn't them. Stop trying to excuse poor performance by blaming the person who isn't satisfied. People wonder why their bedrooms are dead when their partners never climax. If you kept having bad …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 06:47 AM
15

Separate beds/rooms tends to mean we both get a better night's sleep and it actually improved our sex life, we found if we went to bed together by the time we're both laying down we're tired and only really thinking about sleep but with separate rooms we make an active decision and as soon as we're both in one room it's on. We went from having sex 1/2 times a week to 5/6 and there's a lot more sexual energy during the day time as well, getting handsy/flirtatious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 06:13 AM
11

Fantastic, get a pre nup, it already exists 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:55 PM
5

So, you want a legally binding contract that stipulates appropriate behaviours in a relationship that could have potential financial ramifications if you breach the contract?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:53 PM
15

Except he rejected her multiple times, flip the sexes and absolutely the guy should take no for an answer, it would even be harassment if he continued, the same as it would be for her. If shit is getting in the way of your relationship, wouldn't you want someone to respect your wishes and move on? Or would you prefer someone to chase and desperately cling to the you despite you rejecting them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 02:20 PM
8

A lot of places in society do have prostitution as an option, but men still complain because now their only option is to pay for it and they don't get to experience relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 11:24 AM
10

No they don't, experiencing sex is not a right because that implies that it is is up to somebody else to make sure its upheld and there should never be a situation in which a woman is forced to take a virginity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 11:08 AM
1

So by your own logic you believe that you will never find anyone that loves you, any woman you ever date will be settling and will never respect you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 10:46 AM
0

Well by your logic 80% of people are settling, are you top 20%?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 09:40 AM
6

So because someone has had sex before with a partner more attractive than their current spouse, that means they think they're better than their spouse? The funny thing here is that there is absolutely nothing a woman can say or do that would make you believe that they think they're equal. If 1000 women told you they didn't settle for below their standard, you'd accuse them of lying. If 1000 women told you they loved their husbands and saw them as equals, you'd accuse them of lying. If 1000 women…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:07 AM
5

So average men would like to have above average women but settle for average or below, and average women would like to have above average men but settle for average or below... I'm not seeing an issue here. The majority of people want a conventionally attractive partner, which is why it's referred to as conventionally attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:31 AM
–

You realise you can do both, right? It's possible to develop success in your career, style, hobbies and love life simultaneously. In fact, for most people, it's also possible to keep them separated, they don't need to be linked at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:27 AM
5

To me, the difference is that when I watch porn I don't stop until I ejaculate and when my wife reads smut, she gets aroused and jumps on me. I think people, in general, are far less likely to physically pleasure themselves when reading, I can't see anyone blaming smut for a bad sex life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:12 AM
2

So you agree that no men in the western world are alone?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:01 PM
3

In which case, neither are men. It's cool guys, we've solved it, in the western world no one is alone and can not be described that way. Problem solved, let's go home.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:45 PM
1

I think he's referring to in society in the western world as opposed to on a deserted island... good try though...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:40 PM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/jun/18/later-in-life-virgins-at-my-age-it-becomes-a-red-flag https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/dead-bedroom#meaning https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/love-sex/relationships/a64339071/80-and-20-rule/ No, you didn't, you're delusional...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:15 PM
1

Holy shit, most marriages have dead bedrooms? Come on, this is getting silly now, you honestly believe that the majority of marriages are platonic? Im done, you win, I can't fight delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:55 PM
1

I'm not gaslighting anyone, mate copying is 100% real and men do it too! Otherwise the bible would never have spoken about coveting thy neighbours wife. Men settle too, it's not exclusively women but settling doesn't mean you're unhappy or you don't like/love your partner. Also if women settle then why would their "sky high" standards matter? In the west 2.2% of men are virgins by the age of 30 and i don't believe for a second that that's because 78% of men visited prostitutes and 20% fucked wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:30 PM
1

It is you coping because you have to believe there's a reason you can't find a mate, but it can't be your fault, So there has to be a problem with all women or you need to come to terms with the fact that they're just not all that into you. Women's standards are higher, that doesn't mean the 80/20 rule is real, it means women don't have to settle for crap options anymore. If there standards are higher why would they settle like you claim? The issue isn't with 50% of the human race, it's with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:07 PM
2

So 80% of men are fucking prostitutes or women that don't want to have sex with them? Cope harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 11:44 AM
1

Holy shit, of the 80/20 rule applies outside of OLD please explain why 80% of men aren't virgins?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 11:40 AM
7

The 80/20 rule is something that literally only applies to OLD! And it doesn't mean that 80% of women are fucking 20% of men it just means that's who they're swiping right on. OLD is like a takeout menu, nobody chooses the shitty looking options and it just so happens that men make up most of the shittier options in the online world. It has precisely 0 bearing in real life. In the real world by the age of 30 less than 5% of men are virgins (studies vary, but most say between 5% and 2.2%) and les…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:30 AM
2

Except i didn't say that no women think size matters, I said not all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:50 AM
4

Because being pickier doesn't mean 80% of women fuck 20% of men, it just means they have higher standards than men, I never referenced looks at all in the standards, except to say men seem to expect women to look past how they look. To say women have "extremely high physical standards" is laughable when you look at all the people in the world who have successful, happy relationships. How is it verifiably false that people men see as "chads" have a high failure rate? Do you think they fuck every …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 09:45 AM
1

Haha 😂 okay, so no woman on reddit gets criticised for bad decisions. Sure thing 👍🏿
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:40 AM
1

Holy shit, yeah, women change their minds and get raked over the coals for it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:29 AM
0

If a woman changed her mind and also did not inform her partner, she would be equally as scummy? There is no double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:21 AM
5

Women are pickier about whom they have relationships with because they now have more choice and that's not a bad thing. People should hold the standards they want. The fact is women have always had higher standards than men, but historically, they've not had much choice. Why is giving them some autonomy a bad thing? To all the "nice guys" out there, would you actually be happy if you had a daughter and people were constantly telling her to lower her standards? Should she look past how they look …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:18 AM
28

Ah yes, the female hivemind have slipped and let their guard down, good catch brother. About time we had some real evidence that ALL women feel the same way! Now all we need to do is find the queen bee who provides these abhorrent opinions and make her pass on a new message of love for all penis sizes, micro or mega! (/s for those who couldn't tell!) This lady has gone from what was probably a very large sized penis on her ex to a borderline micro penis (which is in such a small minority), so ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 05:47 AM
4

So you watched a YouTube video and at the end of it the woman presented advice which you've elected to ignore and now you're asking for different women to give you advice? Maybe try listening the first time? Have you heard the saying, "Women talk to twice as much as men, because they're always having to repeat themselves." There is no magic code for getting into a woman's bed, there's no series of words that will get them to like you, honestly a good start is to treat them like people instead of…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 05:25 PM
0

More people cheat than you know! My source? Trust me bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 05:02 PM
0

So you're hoping to lower the standards of women instead of putting in some real effort? Women should stop dating guys they like and give the nice guys a shot because it might lead to a longer lasting relationship? Should they also stop chasing men they find sexually appealing? Maybe Quasimodo is actually a really sweet guy and that's who Esmerelda should have wanted all along? Attraction and emotional/mental stimulation is over rated ladies, you need to give the nice guys a chance after all. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 10:18 PM
2

I absolutely can, I hold my partner accountable for an awful lot of things in life, but her ability to orgasm is based on my ability to please her. You can't blame someone for not feeling aroused when you can't arouse them. Sexual gratification and orgasm is based on pleasure and I know when we're having sex I don't need to pleasure myself and none of my partners have ever had to pleasure themselves, that's why we're having sex, to pleasure each other. I was able to figure this out at 16. If a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:40 PM
1

You're clutching. You just want to find a way to blame women for the fact they're not having fun in the bedroom 🤣🤣. No erectile dysfunction is no one's fault, just like vaginismus is no one's fault. You can't seriously be comparing your inability to bring your partner to climax with a physical/mental health condition? Your partners sexual pleasure in the bedroom is your responsibility, that's how sex works, it involves two people each trying to bring the other to climax, if your goal is self ple…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:18 PM
1

"You're infantalizing women by acting like it's the man's responsibility to get her to orgasm." Like 2/3 comments up in this thread. Yes, it is the mans responsibility to make sure his sexual partners are having fun. Sex is indeed a two-way street in which both parties should be enjoying themselves. If one of them never reaches orgasm and the other always does, I think it's pretty clear where the problem lies. (Hint: the problem isn't with the one who doesn't orgasm.) As for your pretty niche ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:04 PM
2

Yeah, there are definitely off days, days when you're not quite on the same page or particularly stressed etc. but it's a lot easier to just walk away and try again later than try to force a situation that isn't working well for one of you, it's painfully obvious when someone isn't having fun. It really is funny how complicated men make it seem, you don't need to have had 100 partners or had sex 100 times to figure out what works and what doesn't, I know what feels good for the other person by h…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:40 PM
2

Absolutely if a woman has religious trauma that should be worked out in therapy before you engage in sex with her, not after (or after the first time if you were unaware, not after having given her more reason to hate sex over a prolonged period of time) and we're still only referencing 10-15% of women, not the 85% majority who are more than capable of orgasm. There is a difference in biological response between the sexes, but how often during sex is a man working on himself or providing instruc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:24 PM
2

I'd really love a genuine answer to this one, I'd be horrified and humiliated to find out my partner hasn't enjoyed sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:12 PM
2

And how much accountability do men take to get their own orgasm during sex? For most, all it takes is a few quick thrusts and the game is over. You're infantalizing men by acting like the inability to get a woman to orgasm is something it's up to the woman to fix, I find it actually hilarious that men need "help" with this. Women are not complex creatures that require years of study, it's also not their job to assist you in pleasuring them, that's ridiculous. How much training do women require i…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:49 PM
2

So 10-15% of women have never had an orgasm and we both agree that there are potential reasons for that, shame, anxiety, and religious trauma, but you still expect them to help? So despite the fact they may feel shame around their own sexual pleasure, they're supposed to overcome that on their own and help you make them orgasm? Seems fair... Again, it really isn't a complicated thing. It does take effort to make your partner orgasm but it's not impossible and it certainly isn't a difficult task.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:08 PM
3

I think that's a lot rarer than you think and also most likely due to the fact that women exploring themselves is something that a lot of people don't agree with and shame. It also provides a very handy excuse for those who can't satisfy their partners...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:37 PM
3

Because contrary to popular belief women aren't actually all that complicated, despite what others may have told you growing up you don't have to be a god in bed to make a woman orgasm, you just have to give a shit if she does or not. Try and see it from their point of view, imagine you get into bed with a woman and have to explain the up and down motion of a handjob or she starts to perform oral but it's all teeth and it hurts you. You'd get sick of it pretty quickly and that's what women have …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:26 PM
12

No, they're in a long term committed relationship and they'd previously discussed a desire for marriage. If he changed his mind he should have told her straight away and if he never wanted to get married at all then he should have told her in their previous conversations.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 10:03 AM
–

If you're having conversations you wouldn't want your partner to read or conversations you wouldn't want them to have with someone else, then there's a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:36 AM
13

No, there was never any romantic intention on her part, so what would she have hidden? Her lack of sexual interest in him? I suppose you could argue she hid her true feelings about his confession but I think that's justifiable, if she called him sweet but found it creepy and weird she was trying to spare his feelings but needed someone to talk to about how she felt about the situation. In this case her friend group and its only because one of her friends betrayed her trust that he ever found out…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:21 AM
24

The situations aren't comparable at all, the first is a long term relationship with established trust, romantic involvement and sexual compatibility in which the guy is lying to his partner about the seriousness of their commitment, he's actively deceived her into believing that marriage and kids are a mutual decision that's not too far away. The second is a man having a crush on a woman he's been friends with, he claims she's been flirting with him (but if he's been friends with her while activ…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter