TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sufficient-Row-7366 Archive

View 5 posts and 27 comments by Sufficient-Row-7366 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Spot on. Yes, we are all born with given advantages and disadvantages. There's nothing we can do about the circumstances we're born into, but we can use our talents for good. I also disagree with the way that victimhood has been commodified as a status symbol of sorts. Being put in dire circumstances or traumatic situations shouldn't be used as authority or weaponization of any kind
/r/MensRights16/01/26 12:54 AM
21

Academia won't recognize this because it shatters the narrative they're trying to sell.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 06:30 PM
9

I am going after a useful degree (Speech Language Pathology) but one of my requirements is a psych class
/r/MensRights15/01/26 06:21 PM
36

Yeah, I noticed these asymmetries through the semester as we were discussing in class. I do my own research and look at things like the Tender Years doctrine, Duluth model, and Selective Services, and I see how men are disadvantaged in ways that aren't recognized in academia
/r/MensRights15/01/26 06:20 PM
43

There's one episode of Dr. Phil, where a man was recounting his abuse of getting tackled, kicked, and punched by his partner. She swung a chair at his head. He shoved her back. Afterward, he sustained bruises, cuts, and scratches from the aforementioned assault. Dr. Phil said something to the effect of: "It doesn't matter if she hits you. You never lay hands on a woman." I never really liked Dr. Phil, but that was a new low.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 09:03 AM
2

True. There's even this shaming with conservative men and women for a man who doesn't adhere to the standard. i.e: Charlie Kirk saying a man who doesn't pay on the first date is a "beta male"
/r/MensRights20/11/25 03:43 PM
13

I do believe in bodily autonomy, but there is no such equivalent of financial abortion for the man should the woman choose to keep the child. That's where it breaks down for me.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:47 PM
15

The thing is: a lot of issues that the left favors end up being detrimental to men. Things like abortion rights ignoring male reproductive rights, the Duluth model for domestic violence, etc. It might not be explicitly anti men's rights, but in effect, that's what it ends up being due to the focus being very one sided
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:41 PM
17

I know the political left doesn't necessarily equal misandry, but in my experience, whenever I've tried to add nuance to a discussion about gender, I've been shut down and ostracized by feminists. In the same vein, right leaning spaces adhere to tradition and gender roles, often ignoring male specific issues
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:18 PM
1

I caution against your proposed solution because it can lead to an echo chamber. We all know that can't be a good thing. It may not seem like it, but there are women out there who do care. Shutting women as a whole out means losing allies in this fight. Rome wasn't built in a day, and progress takes time. Call me naive, but I still remain hopeful that there is a path to actual balance.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 10:46 AM
0

My fear is that radical action, like it seems you're proposing, will lead to an overcorrection. We've already seen this with feminism. We need to hear each other out. Shutting out women as a whole will make the problem worse. I don't want men's rights to regress in the same way. Marriage and partnership aren't inherently trash. It's just that society values it less now, hence the decline in marriage and uptick in promiscuity. No movement has benefitted from action alone. Take a look at the peace…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 09:14 AM
3

Not listening to each other hinders progress. It's not easy and often uncomfortable, maybe even heated, but it's a path to progress and action rather than being inactive and letting hate fester. I don't see the role reversal as a "game" but rather a scale, a universal standard to hold behaviors to. Yes, men and women are different. That doesn't in any way, shape, or form justify giving crappy behavior and moral hypocrisy a free pass. If you can't control what you do or say when you get upset, th…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 07:34 AM
6

Couldn't be further from my personal experience. My home country has traditions around circumcision (The circumcision rate is in the 90% range) and mine was done non consensually at 10 years old. I've also met a number of others who regret it.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 03:30 AM
2

Yeah. God, I hate when people bring that up as if retribution actually leads to productivity. How far have we fallen that people forget that "two wrongs don't make a right?"
/r/MensRights18/08/25 10:04 PM
1

If we take our respective stances: their social justice POV vs. my ethical/fairness POV and apply it to a debate about race, they'd be justifying racism in the present day because of past slavery and I would challenge them saying discrimination is wrong regardless of history. It's incredible how fast their "logic" falls apart
/r/MensRights18/08/25 09:11 AM
1

I agree that good level of emotional control is needed, but I think this stoicism you're promoting is genuinely harmful and especially destructive. It's only natural that words hurt, and you can't just keep taking hits without breaking. Even a dam will burst under too much pressure. Furthermore, I really don't appreciate you discrediting u/AshKetchep on the basis of her being a woman. She has a right to an opinion just as much as you and I. That's all
/r/MensRights18/08/25 03:23 AM
2

u/WesleyGaming_YT, you can see the effect perpetuating this media has on YouTube. There's a whole lot of social experiment videos where they have actors in public acting out arguments that lead to beatings (it's all scripted and staged) but there's a consistent pattern of the public intervening quickly in a male attacker/female victim scenarios and doing absolutely nothing during female attacker/male victim scenarios.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 01:41 AM
4

I can somewhat agree with your sentiment, but I'm not sure that time was necessarily "wasted," as my argument clearly was strengthening and is likely very valuable to people who choose to engage or take the time to read it. If you yourself don't want to read or engage in long arguments, that's your perogative entirely, but engaging with people with opposing views is an undeniably important part of men's rights advocacy
/r/MensRights17/08/25 04:32 PM
3

That's fair. I'm glad we can find common ground. Also, note that in The Boys, Hughie is SA'd more than once (with one of the assailants pretending to be his girlfriend). In either case, it's still treated with less sensitivity than when it happens to a female character in the same show. I used to watch The Boys, but after seeing how they handled Hughie, it turned me off from the show. I hate this double standard so much
/r/MensRights17/08/25 03:38 AM
6

Respectfully disagree: Yes, male on female violence is problematic and often fatal, but that doesn't excuse the reverse situation. Even if it is "milder," it perpetuates the normalization of violence, regardless of severity, fatality or statistics, so I still object to you using this to downplay or justify it. Not all depictions of male abuse are "mild." I can think of Hughie's sexual assault in The Boys and Eric Kripke saying he thought it'd be "funny." Contrast that with Starlight's SA scene, …
/r/MensRights16/08/25 09:17 PM
1

I definitely could have worded that better, what I meant was that relationships, especially with age gaps, are judged differently depending on the age gap and gender. As you see in the clip, the audience celebrates the woman, but had it been a man in her position, the reaction would be far different (definitely some cheers, but far more judgement)
/r/MensRights13/08/25 11:01 PM
2

I definitely could have worded that last point better, but my point was that the dynamics in relationships are perceived differently depending on the gender and age, regardless of moral standing. Thanks for pointing it out
/r/MensRights13/08/25 03:09 PM
1

I think you may be missing my point. If this exact situation had played out in that comedy club, but with an old man, that crowd would be dead silent, and the comedian would either pivot topics or make jokes at the man's expense. You may reject that judgment altogether, but my point is that instead of cheering and "empowerment," the reactions would be far more judgement, tension, and unease due to how negatively male sexuality is viewed.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 11:37 AM
1

Yeah, I've seen that clip of Charlize Theron. I mostly just feel bad for her kids and how self-centered she is to put her wants and her pleasure over their needs. It's disgusting
/r/MensRights13/08/25 10:53 AM
4

Huh, I don't think I caught that episode. I watch Dropouts, Game Changer, etc, occasionally. The double standards hurt everyone, and I don't see enough people speaking out on behalf of men and male victims. I don't see how "feminism is equality" when it's very clearly not
/r/MensRights13/08/25 04:06 AM
3

Oh, that's my bad! I misinterpreted your comment. Yes, when I watched in class, it's definitely something I noticed, but like you said, it's kind of unclear
/r/MensRights23/04/25 04:57 PM
2

I linked the YouTube video if you'd like to watch, but I would say in this particular case, yes. The male interpreter is used as a "bad" example in these scenarios, while the female interpreter is used as the "good" example. Granted, the video is 14 years old, so I'm not sure that gender diversity and social justice were as emphasized as they are now.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 04:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter