Sufficient_Radio_109 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	What do you think about "men like woman more than the other way around"? I never said that the lowest quintile didn't have higher birthrates, I said that the fertility curve is increasingly u-shaped, which it is, and it will continue to increase. Since most of the lowest quintile's offspring will fail to reproduce themselves, it doesn't change anything for the original argument. That's their whole schtick, they produce many low quality offspring in the hopes that at least one of them makes it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/07/24 08:09 PM
0	What do you think about "men like woman more than the other way around"? You're narrowly defining elite by educational attainment. The highest income quintile is rapidly increasing its fertility all accross the world. This is a lot more relevant to overall male mate quality than education.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/07/24 06:52 PM
3	What do you think about "men like woman more than the other way around"? Male and female reproductive strategies are at almost always odds, the species' baseline is determined by the ongoing negotiation between the two. I already noted above that humans are the model of K-strategist but there is still a wide range of behavior within the species. These traits are contrasted with r-strategists, who produce many offspring, have a high reproductive rate, low parental investment, and often thrive in unstable or unpredictable environments. Isolate the aforementioned popula…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/07/24 06:44 PM
5	What do you think about "men like woman more than the other way around"? r/K selection theory describes two different reproductive strategies: r-selected species produce many offspring with less parental care, while K-selected species produce fewer offspring but invest more in each one's survival. That's the gist. It's fuzzy because there are hybrid strategies and humans are socially and sexually weird. Think of inner city blacks and their dozen baby mammas, whose children mostly won't make it, vs. the few elite men having high quality offspring with a single woman, …	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/07/24 05:15 PM
-3	What do you think about "men like woman more than the other way around"? It's not misandrist. It's simply male nature, which is radically different from female nature. Males are not defective women; the sexes might as well be different species in terms of the terminal values that drive them. Our type of female has no need to distinguish herself, so they typically don't. Without the male drive, we'd still be living in our natural state: Dunbar's number communities where everyone's energy is used up on social and status games leaving little time for anything else. Ther…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/07/24 04:42 PM
7	What do you think about "men like woman more than the other way around"? They don't. Have you not noticed that we're living through a massive fertility crisis? As soon as women got control of their own fertility and gained their own money the first thing they did was stop birthing sons for most men out there. This is the opposite of the Universal Basic Pussy and wife-buying you see in the most patriarchal socities.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/07/24 04:33 PM
8	What do you think about "men like woman more than the other way around"? This is not true. The elite are producing lots of offspring, as are the lowest quintile. It is the middle, heavily anti-natalist and not fully comitted to an r or K strategy, that is being hollowed out.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/07/24 04:29 PM
5	On the dating book for women "Why men love bitches" Part of being autistic seems to be complete rigidity and inability to adapt so even if this advice was effective I doubt you'd be able to apply it. I see the same thing from autistic men here. Black and white thinking is one of the defining characteristics of your disorder.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/07/24 04:47 AM
1	Is using economic allegories to human relationships inherently dehumanizing? Hang out around enough losers and it quickly becomes apparent they're not at all sympathetic. I spent enough years as a pick-me for loser males to understand this keenly.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/07/24 12:40 PM
–	Vogue dating columnist casually admits that women have it hard in dating because they need to compete for a minority of men Sorry, I don't speak Zoomer, TikTok or whatever the hell that is.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/07/24 02:24 PM
2	Debate: What is more important for dating as a man: being physically attractive or being neurotypical (non-autistic or "normal": i.e. being able to naturally socially conform) There's no plastic surgery equivalent for your brain, so it still applies.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/24 05:56 PM
3	Debate: What is more important for dating as a man: being physically attractive or being neurotypical (non-autistic or "normal": i.e. being able to naturally socially conform) Don't look up life expectancy figures...	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/24 05:51 PM
1	There's a difference between falling for a long term friend gradually, and befriending a woman you have a crush/lust after in the sole hope that your "friendship" will make her sleep with you. Men approaching women has created such a giant glut of male attention that, without the incel violence or sore loser tantrums when they get rejected, basically the value of male sexuality is now zero. It's inherently negative, actually. It's not only that penis is so worthless than you literally can't give it away: accepting it devalues you in turn. It's been discussed to death here before but male sexuality is universally seen as a filthy, corruptive force by both men and women. Only a few outl…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/24 05:45 PM
–	Vogue dating columnist casually admits that women have it hard in dating because they need to compete for a minority of men Your initial premise is wrong though, women have always been like this, everywhere—it's not due to misandrist memes. (SSA might be an exception, they're on the other end of the gradient from East Asians) In stable, wealthy countries they simply have no need to pretend otherwise. Other countries don’t have this issue as much because they dont have stupid divorce laws that are literally designed to fuck men over. Women make their own money now, that's by far the most important factor, not divorce.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/24 05:26 PM
–	Vogue dating columnist casually admits that women have it hard in dating because they need to compete for a minority of men The fertility curve is increasingly u-shaped; the true elite are having lots of children now. It's the middle that's being hollowed out.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/24 05:17 PM
–	Vogue dating columnist casually admits that women have it hard in dating because they need to compete for a minority of men Exactly. Exclusion is the essence of femaleness for animals such as us. And the instances where it is flipped—proactive, predatory females chasing the male—do exist but are comparatively rare and require very specific circumstances to evolve.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/24 05:15 PM
–	Vogue dating columnist casually admits that women have it hard in dating because they need to compete for a minority of men There are low and high status men for every subculture, hobby or movement.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/24 05:10 PM
–	Vogue dating columnist casually admits that women have it hard in dating because they need to compete for a minority of men It's not the same in other countries because women are forced to obfuscate and pretend due to culture or material circumstances, and Western men's standards are unreasonable high. They expect to be seduced and desired as if they were women. If there is a problem with Western masculinity, it is that. In most of the world most men don't expect their wives to desire them; their job is to lie there and get pregnant, clean, cook and take care of the children. East Asians quietly have the world's high…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/24 03:38 PM
3	The patriarchy will never go extinct This is simplistic and uniformed. Agropatriarchal values dominated when you needed men who could leverage their greater strength and aggression to defend fertile patches of land. It was an alliance between elite men and low value men, where the latter got wives and the former got soldiers and everyone benefited from the caloric surplus. Farmers are the original bug-men and rice-farming cultures as by far the worst in this regard; the labor needs often culminated in arranged marriage cultures whe…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/07/24 06:05 PM
5	Attractiveness matters to men so there’s no reason for them to be upset when attractiveness matters to women. First of all, it is not Mommy‘s job to teach you how to get your dick wet Wrong! As a parent it is your moral duty to give your child every possible advantage over the competition, to prepare them in any way to can for a life of success, both social and reproductive. To argue otherwise goes against every imperative evolution has bequathed us. I'm not arguing here that every person should be a parent (though they should!) but if you do make that choice, acknowledging the full extent of the respon…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/07/24 03:50 PM
13	Attractiveness matters to men so there’s no reason for them to be upset when attractiveness matters to women. Is it an autism thing that some guys just miss all of that? Pretty much.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/07/24 03:41 PM
3	People here say that women have no empathy for men but I have noticed that men have 0 empathy for divorced men unless they're divorced themselves Men have 0 empathy for other men, period, so how exactly is this a reach? It's not unfair to say that men fear, hate and are disgusted by other men at least as much as women and arguably more so. It's the main lesson I took from my time as a pick-me MRA: men do not give a single fuck about other men and it is hopeless to expect them to. They're far more motivated by resentments and competition than they'll ever be by empathy or any deep sense of genuine fairness.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/07/24 12:20 PM
1	CMV: women with delusional standards due to sexual attention from appealing men are the functional equivalent of men who fall for strippers who just want their money I think you're confused about how high testosterone men actually 'date'. They're sexual opportunists that will choose being desired over access to beauty. Also more likely to be gynephilic than hebephilic so highly tuned to secondary sexual characteristics over youth markers. Low-T populations prefer tits over ass too, btw. Compare Sub-Saharans to East Asians and the distinctions will be readily obvious.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/07/24 04:27 PM
13	What’s the point of telling women they’re expired? You can't separate guys that wouldn't cheat and those that simply lack opportunity.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/07/24 12:08 AM
2	CMV: women with delusional standards due to sexual attention from appealing men are the functional equivalent of men who fall for strippers who just want their money From my understanding, men that date strippers tend to have have high testosterone/low inhibitions and primarily prioritizie sexual compatability over homosocial status i.e. respect from the homies	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/07/24 07:45 PM
5	CMV: women with delusional standards due to sexual attention from appealing men are the functional equivalent of men who fall for strippers who just want their money Men also lie more, full stop.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/07/24 07:41 PM
2	Women's SMV is the highest in history, when will it come down? By the end of the century, one way or another. But no one posting here will like what it looks like. The end of sexual scarcity—from men's point of view, the only one that matters in this context—is within sight but the result will be Lovecraftian and bizarre if we remain technological and brutally violent and hideous if we have another dark age. The only relevant factor here is the fact that all of our industrial-capitalist metacivilization is being squeezed through a very narrow reproductive b…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/07/24 05:29 AM
1	The secretary problem and applying optimal stopping theory to "dating to settle" No shit... Why is it such a common female error mode to dismiss useful heuristics by hyperfocusing on exceptions? Every. single. time. Science should study this.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/24 08:50 PM
2	The secretary problem and applying optimal stopping theory to "dating to settle" We become rigid and set in our ways as we age. By 'grow together' I mean the ability to adapt yourself to your partner's quirks and build a relationship that's stronger than the sum of its parts. After 35-40 it's basically impossible to integrate someone into your space and routines if you've been single for most of your life, unless they're a people-pleasing doormat—and that comes with its own problems.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/24 08:04 PM
2	Many men complain that they dont receive empathy, words of affirmation, and validation from women, and almost no woman wants to do anything with them unless they can exploit him in some way- resources. But they also block and avoid well-meaning female friends who dont see them in a romantic light Love is an action, not a feeling.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/24 02:01 PM
1	The secretary problem and applying optimal stopping theory to "dating to settle" What this means is that you should probably decide after 2-4 partners, if youre in your mid/late 20s, whether the next one that is better than all previous ones, and if he/she is, that it may be good to settle. I think most people also do this somewhat naturally, as can be see by people shifting from wild and fun to "looking for something more serious" as they approach 30. At least in my experience. It took me having sex with hundreds of men, three long-term relationships and a few other short-t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/07/24 01:51 PM