TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sugariie Archive

View 3 posts and 115 comments by Sugariie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The fact that you think sperm is the same as a fetus means that nobody should waste their time arguing with you.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 06:33 PM
1

I am not trolling..? I actually support Men'sRights and can't associate with feminists because of their blatant misandry.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 04:26 PM
4

The feminist mindset is men can walk down a deserted dark path at midnight (which is stupid btw) so we can too. And what's funny about that is that men are more likely to be assaulted and murdered than women are. Just because you feel unsafe doesn't mean you are. But yeah, don't let your guard down just because you're entitled to safety, rapists aren't dumb people who don't know what they're doing.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 08:07 PM
3

Ohh I get it thanks. I agree with it if that's the case.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 07:17 PM
3

So you're just pointing out it's dumb to advocate for this stuff to stop (which I agree, telling rapists to stop does nothing), or something else?
/r/MensRights02/04/20 07:00 PM
3

Doesn't this seem a little victim-blamey ish? I hate the "tell the boys not to rape" because that ultimately leads to nothing, but are you saying the messages are wrong itself or are you saying it's dumb to assume that it will stop because we keep holding marches? Because if it's the first, I don't think it's a good comparison considering there's pretty much nothing you can do to stop rape.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:53 PM
13

​ Rape is illegal. In the UK, female on male rape is not a thing. There are little to no shelters for male abuse victims. Under current UK legislation, only a man can commit rape. There are many resources in my community for men and women alike who are victims of domestic violence. According to a 2010 study by Parity, a men’s issues campaigning group, more than 40 per cent of victims of domestic violence are male. Yet startlingly, as BBC London reported last week, there are no refuges in London …
/r/MensRights02/04/20 05:04 PM
10

If they were kept as slaves, of course from those who treated them as subhuman. But black people, in general, shouldn't get restitution if they weren't kept as slaves (which I'd say is a good majority of them at the moment).
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:54 PM
4

It was the rich, white men. Men include black men and poor/average men too, while had more rights, they weren't all living in luxury at the expense of women. Women didn't have rights at the time but if you were a man you'd have to have a lot of money to really be at the top.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:51 PM
1

1, yes I am. 2, i agree, she should be arrested (and I believe she was), 3/4, I got you now. This is useless to continue though.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 04:26 PM
1

1, Literally nobody thinks that. Men get the short end of the stick but being a man is not inherently bad. 2, here's the article, the woman apparently had a history of assault charges against the man and she was arrested for it based on evidence they found. 3, Specify. Vagenda? Natures Credit card?
/r/MensRights31/03/20 05:07 PM
10

Russel Faria won a $2 million settlement after he served more than three years in a Missouri prison for his wife's murder before his conviction was overturned Faria had been convicted and sentenced to life in prison for the 2011 murder of his wife Betsy, whom he insisted was murdered by her friend, Pamela Hupp Hupp, who is accused by Russel of stabbing Betsy to death, is already serving a life sentence for the 2016 murder of disabled man Louis Gumpenberger A husband who served more than three ye…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 04:37 PM
1

What? 1, being a girl is not bad, 2, if you believe it's not rape because of their gender you're a rape apologist and automatically invalid, 3, how are we to do anything when we're called a hate group constantly and are pretty much still new to this?
/r/MensRights31/03/20 03:38 PM
2

If you think it's the truth then you're opinion is automatically invalid. We don't listen to rape apologists.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 04:24 PM
13

Disregarding the fact that a woman doesn't have to have a child in the first place or could get bottles that contain the same milk for the child.. But all in all, it's a violation of autonomy. Mutilation period.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:48 PM
7

You do realize that also falls into the category of rape which is a violation of bodily autonomy?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:46 PM
6

Definition of child (source https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/child ) : an unborn or recently born person Child is also not a scientific term.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:43 PM
2

Wtf lmao. You do realize the biggest problem here is the misinformation presented in this ad, right? Protecting what? It's been debunked above numerous times and is just a bad thing to misrepresent.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:56 PM
1

Equal opportunity means that they will get treated equally regardless of internal biases or preferences, and that they're ability to get it won't be hindered. Not really if they have the money for it or live in a location to get it.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 06:39 PM
1

It isnt considered a straw man argument if it was stated. It wasn't. I put the original comment and it stated nothing of which you just said. IF this was true, when you're hired purely to fulfill a sexist quota instead of on merit you can't expect to be paid the same amount. And yes, in the US everyone has equal opportunity. Some can't afford it, and some choose not to with every possibility inbetween. And when I mean experience I'm talking about what you're saying, but I'm also saying abilities…
/r/MensRights18/03/20 07:23 PM
1

The poster above literally said that some people do not deserve the same wages for the same position depending on why they were hired. No they didn't. They said, "IF this was true, when you're hired purely to fulfill a sexist quota instead of on merit you can't expect to be paid the same amount." If you were hired to fulfill a sexist agenda instead of based on your abilities, you can't be expected to be paid the same amount as someone who is more capable. They said that gap should exist if you a…
/r/MensRights18/03/20 05:21 PM
1

However, nobody said that. Nobody is advocating for a wage gap, they're pointing out that you shouldn't expect this when this happens. You're the one saying that women are less qualified, we were talking about those hired on the basis of their agenda. But keep making strawmans, it might work.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:05 PM
0

You were hired on the basis of their agenda instead of on merit. So those who were hired on merit rather than fulfilling their agenda would get paid more because they are more capable. But those hired for an agenda are more capable of pushing the agenda rather than doing the job itself. You can be hired for their agenda and meet the qualifications, but this is specifically on those who were hired solely on their agenda rather than their abilities.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:58 PM
2

I'm not talking about the female CEO thing, I'm talking about that it's not satire. Everyone from every sub knows this is satire (I'm hoping). But people on TrollXChromosomes think the wage gap is a thing, and had a thread about the 4% thing. Nobody's using this as a basis for an argument, but there are people who legitimately thinks that the wage gap is still real.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:52 PM
1

If they only paid you because you fit their agenda and threw away your abilities, then if you're not as good as those who were hired because they were fit or even better for the job you can't be expected to be paid more. You were paid for their agenda to be pushed, not because you either meet or exceed the qualifications.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:33 PM
2

The only reason people are taking this seriously is because of those who unironically believe this is true. The poster knows it's satire, the commenters know it's satire, nobody is arguing it's real but rather with those who think it is. And I'm not taking Reddit seriously, why would I? But the person who posted it said it was satire themselves but was referencing to the comments who think it's true.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 06:08 PM
3

I agree, and there's some science behind it. Men are more likely to take risks (evident with what teen boys do and r/WhyWomenLiveLonger), so stuff like taking big roles like CEO, handle responsibilities and such would give them the adrenaline rush they love.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:23 PM
2

I mean, people are and presenting facts alongside it. My point is, everyone knows it's satire, but we're talking about those who unironically believe this shit.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:18 PM
1

I'm just asking if you mean like being completely independent without a man, which I would agree that most women would not like that lifestyle. But if you mean without a job completely I would disagree unless the man is able to be 100% self sufficient.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:15 PM
2

And nobody said otherwise..?
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:13 PM
2

We know it's a joke but this is directed to the people who unironically believe this.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:10 PM
2

Troll X chromosomes took it pretty seriously and unironically posted it in their sub-it may be a joke but people seriously believe this shit.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:08 PM
-1

By self-supporting do you mean like alone without a romantic partners' support or they don't want to have a job? Because if it's the latter then that would be a lie.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:08 PM
3

Nobody said that. They're saying that is you were hired on the basis of their agenda rather than your abilities then you can't expect to be paid the same amount.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:06 PM
2

But the problem is telling people what they should feel about the situation. If it happened to me, I'd feel violated, I wouldn't get PTSD obviously but this is just violating and normalizing this behavior just perpetuates the idea that you should just let it go and 'it doesn't matter take a joke'. Whether those guys take it as a joke is up to them, but the problem is nobody finds it as a problem but as a cute thing some chick did that we should laugh at. Unlike the reporter who was groped live b…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 08:04 PM
1

I mean, this is on par with the bad facebook memes about hating their wife.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 05:06 PM
3

I try, I try, I really try to give everybody the benefit of the doubt but it always gets thrown into the garbage with the rest of my hope. Suggestion noted.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:23 PM
2

True. Feminists literally don't have the balls to actually "killallmen" unless it comes to self defense. I think we can all agree on hating the crazy bitches who do this shit, but when it comes for advocating genocide against the other gender feminists totally draw the line.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:00 PM
5

Probably something like "It isn't the majority or enough people to claim that it's the outcome of rejection. I mean, more guys get rejected by girls because they normally talk first, so those guys doing horrible shit are outliers. And women burn, destroy, lie, or just try to destroy his life when they're rejected, I'd assume more likely than a guy to kill someone over rejection."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 11:04 PM
3

While I'd say they go farther, it's not the majority so enough to say that they're more dangerous. They have highs and lows, like EXTREME highs and lows, but those are the outliers who have some problems. And I think calling them entitled is just a bad term to use, obviously something is going on with them beyond feeling entitled to a women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 10:57 PM
1

Child : an unborn or recently born person
/r/MensRights29/02/20 09:17 PM
4

It's a human being that doesn't feel, taste, think, hear, see, etc. It's a human being that might grow up unwanted, unloved and potentially abused as a result. People abort for many different reasons, and in many cases aborting is a much better option than raising a child in poverty and neglect, or abandoning them to be possibly abused or neglected by strangers for the entirety of their childhood and teenage years. This, this is justifying abortion based on who is worthy based on their abilities…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 03:18 AM
1

Your inaction is the reason your son will die, however you actively seek an abortion that actively kills the child. Simple.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:42 AM
0

His money is going to a decision he didn't have the chance to make. What part of that seems fair to you?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:48 PM
1

I don't think it's about taking legal action to prevent it, more of being able to opt out of the responsibilities in case something like that happens and there's a disagreement with the way the child should end up as.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:45 PM
0

How are we stripping away people's bodily autonomy? Why should people have the ability to kill someone who isn't (and is literally incapable) of violating them? That's pretty much justifying murder, if you prevent me from killing my child because I don't want to take care of it you're taking away my right to be a parent.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:43 PM
1

I mean, despite their wishes I'm sure their flight or fight response would get in the way.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:41 PM
2

So we can decide who is worthy of life and who isn't based on their abilities and features? And we can make decisions on it's life based on the possibility of it being bad?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:39 PM
8

I mean, some people have it worse than others, but don't deny your own sufferings because it could've been worse. I'm so sorry what happened to you, and hopefully you can progress successfully.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 01:38 AM
7

Hard to when feminists constantly bash on them for not sharing the same ideals and constantly put the frame of "misogynists" for criticizing and pointing out flaws in the movement. When they talk of misandry they must change it because "misandry doesn't exist because sexism is systematic" or whatever. They're pretty much in their few years of infancy and feminists are basically kicking the baby for not being able to walk yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 12:46 AM
7

What is your point? We see shit like this, we don't like it, we talk about it. What is your point, really?
/r/MensRights10/02/20 11:29 PM
1

It wasn't my point, I think you might be talking about OP of the post. My point was that focusing our blame on the gender rather than the fact that it's a problem is harmful and does nothing in the long run.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 04:08 AM
1

Exactly! I never really pointed fingers, it just boiled my blood that people could be this cruel and why people are this cruel. Not to say that all MRAs are not guilty of pointing fingers, but if we're hypocrites for not constantly doing it then honestly.. idk.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 04:06 AM
2

You're actually right, I forgot making jokes was a coping mechanism a lot of victims use. And that's some good food for thought.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 04:03 AM
3

Then again, it's not her job to be killing them off if they aren't in the process of raping her.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:42 PM
3

Woman: Beats the shit out of a guy Guy: Brb gotta hit the gym first
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/20 05:17 PM
1

I got banned from r/prochoice, r/TwoXChromosomes, and r/AskFeminists. I'm not necessarily trying to keep my image high at this point.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:21 AM
1

You worship the Second Wave FemNazis as Holy Mary who created laws that give default custody to Women and default domestic abuser status to men. God if worship means acknowledge and respect to you then I don't know what to tell you but get your spiteful head out of your ass. and the Duluth Model (god I hate it so much) That was what my response was 2 comments before. You can read it if you'd like, it's unedited. HOW TF DOES ANY OF THAT JUSTIFY PATRIARCHY!? I'm attacking foundational Feminists be…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen29/11/19 12:36 AM
0

WTF are you talking about? You managed to ignore the list of things women lacked that I made so I will repeat myself. Women could not divorce, they couldn't get jobs beyond housewife, they weren't allow to participate in sports, Here are some jobs women weren't allowed to have at those times, Here are some clothing that were banned for women and men. You're the type of people who make this subreddit and MRA/MRM/MGTOW look bad because of your painful ignorance to female problems and how feminism …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen28/11/19 11:09 PM
1

We are not going anywhere. I disagree with you and I'll leave it here.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/19 09:33 PM
1

You're still victim blaming.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/19 07:46 PM
1

You still blamed him for her actions. He still defended himself when she was still a threat, it's not like he ran after her and decided to pound her then.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/19 07:24 PM
0

I agreed with you about the drafts that's why I didn't add it to the examples, but still should be a human right. And I don't like feminism now but it had a purpose before it became a hate group. The hardships do not validate shitty theories, "stare rape", and the Duluth Model (god I hate it so much) but it did serve a purpose once upon a time.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/11/19 11:10 PM
0

Women could not divorce, they couldn't get jobs beyond housewife, they weren't allow to participate in sports, Here are some jobs women weren't allowed to have at those times, Here are some clothing that were banned for women and men. Feminism sucks now but really? You're going to ignore the hardships of being a woman was in those days?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/11/19 08:13 PM
1

Yes, I do not deny that if someone starts a fight then someone attacking back should be expected. And their response, I'm pretty sure it would be justified. Assuming that you posed a threat to their life and/or got on their property then them shooting you would be fine. Even then, a dumbass move for sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:51 PM
1

The presence of danger is always there when someone attacks you, it's not up to "don't hurt the ladies" shit. And you had some terrible victim blaming there which makes your whole comment pretty pathetic, so if you really stand by what you said then all situations where their life isn't threatned would. For example, she was raped in her house and could've ran away but was too scared. He had nothing with him but himself, therefore, according to you, she can just leave and shouldn't have stabbed h…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:28 PM
1

It's his own fault she kept doing it. But he shouldn't have punched her in the face repeatedly. Damn now let's replace this with rape. "Hurr durr but he raped her many times hurr durr". Yes, and she should've stopped him sooner. It's her own fault he kept doing it. But she should've have stabbed him repeatedly.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:19 PM
1

I'm sure he could've called the police while she was slapping him instead of defending himself. Call this an incel sub but sweetie an eye for an eye still applies and is gender fluid.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:15 PM
2

So if someone cheats on you you then get to assault them? Seems pretty reasonable! Now I guess his right to self defense has disintegrated because of some personal relationship problems they had even if there was a better way that wouldn't have gotten you such bad karma.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:13 PM
1

Actually there is a limit to which if self defense was necessary in the case. If she hit him but had no weapon on her and he stabbed her until she died, that would be overboard.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:07 PM
1

Thank you! When I didn't wake up and end up being a bitch I try to make things easier because, um, why not? And I agree with you. If she really ended up being a victim of sexual assault then this would be a huge leap. We're not obligated to believe her, but calling her a liar would be a little far and rough. I think pussypassdenied should just leave stuff like this in general because it's really sensitive beyond "get rekt girl xd". But don't leave the sub, I guess this one person didn't get the …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/19 02:28 AM
1

You're right, I didn't realize. I apologize for that. Also, of course a bunch of them side with the guy. Even though they were pretty dead set, I guess that's really no surprise considering this is suppose to call out female shit anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/19 02:04 AM
1

Where is the wrong in the post? If you're talking about the sub in general then I don't know.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/19 11:41 PM
4

I don't know if you're referencing the post specifically but if you're going to say "hatred for woman" while viewing a post that literally says men are stupid then idk what to tell you.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/19 11:28 PM
1

I never suggested that you said that he was lying, but there is no reason that people must believe her because no proof (as far as I know) has been brought up yet to support any of them. It's not 'incel' behavior, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/19 09:30 PM
2

I don't know much about the situation but is there proof that she is telling the truth? You know, innocent until proven guilty. And same could be said about him suing for defamation, has anything been shown to prove he's lying about her trying to defaming him? If there isn't then that's hypocritical on your part.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/19 07:59 PM
2

I'm sure you can't make the assumption. Saying something on the internet does NOT mean that's the only thing you do. You're ridiculous, we can complain on the internet and use the rest of our time trying to gain our rights. Just like this person, but obviously you know better, don't you?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:36 PM
1

I see your point now. It's true, there's nothing wrong with shifting the narrative on men but to make it a specifically male problem is kind of going backwards.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:53 PM
1

I don't agree with the generalization, but I don't also agree that it's a problem to make a gender neutral issue towards men because if an issue affects men, we talk about it. And I'm sure that many feminists are doing the same thing with men, but I haven't seen any posts about it lately?
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:17 AM
1

I don't know if you're talking about this post or in general, but this is the men's rights subreddit. If something will hurt men, then we'll talk about it. Men are pressured to settle down and so are women, but why should be address it as a gender neutral issue when this is specifically designed for male issues to be addressed? Of course, we should make their problems seem worthless, but this is about men's rights. So if you came to the subreddit to see men's issues, welcome.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 09:56 PM
1

Holy shit, check the deleted comments there are so many lmao.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 07:02 PM
8

Make a post about how it went down, I'm really curious to see how it goes!
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:38 PM
1

There's a difference between not guilty and bullshit. People who were caught lying were spewing bullshit and it was proven, but if you can't convict a person of it if they just don't remember.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:37 PM
3

You do have a point because a sex offender is a person who's been convicted of certain sex crimes, such as sexual assault or sexual conduct with a minor. It would need its own charges like slander, or the person can sue whoever's falsely accusing them with defamation. But people still need a way to know who they can trust, and even if being a sex offender means being involved with such crime, couldn't that change somehow? A sex offender could be someone who commits a crime related to or sexual a…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:35 PM
1

There's a difference between you can't prove them guilty beyond doubt and utter bullshit. If what she's spewing is utter bullshit and she was actually raped, not misremembering things, INTENTIONALLY saying wrong things, then that's just slander.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:34 PM
1

Same here, I don't want MRA's to be associated with those kinds of people because MGTOW is more of a philosophy so how they carry it out has nothing to do with us or the idea itself.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:57 PM
1

I don't really know. A lot of videos discussing MRA's talked about how women were evil, will rob you of money and only wanted your cash. That they didn't want you as a person and you should get away from them. That's a summary (could be biased) but I don't entirely know because I disassociated a while ago.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:32 PM
1

If that was the case then I don't know if I'd be surprised or not. Interesting idea though. I mostly fear for the reaction to this, would people buy into despite the number of juvenile criminals rises when there's more single parents? Didn't feminists want to end female violence (impossible) while encouraging fatherless homes would put them in more danger? Could be a tactic to just keep complaining to see how long their movement will last. Who knows, women are complicated creatures. I wouldn't r…
/r/MensRights15/10/19 08:08 PM
1

You're right. Some can be toxic but it's more of a philosophy and practice (?) so how they practice would be on them.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 07:54 PM
1

I apologize for the MGTOW line, I don't stand what I said because it's more an philosophy than a movement and it would be wrong to lump them all together. Glad you could find a safe space that fits you. And I agree, modern feminism lacks a lot of credit for how stupid their followers have become.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 07:53 PM
4

On the upside, kudos to Vice for giving jobs to mentally challenged people. LMAO Right?? Tbh it really is just giving anything to keep the victim narrative, their facts and logic can be seen from up their ass.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 01:01 AM
4

I think they'd diagnose me with "internalized misogyny" instead. I'm a woman so they can't pull the incel card on me, though I don't think I'd get anything through their head anyways. And lucky you! 20 years with a none feminist wife, sounds like the dream!
/r/MensRights15/10/19 12:59 AM
5

Oh goody, we totally have feminists on our side! Now let's sit and wait for them to fix our problems. ​ Oh god we'd be sitting there for SUCH a LONG time. As long as it takes for feminists to achieve equality.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 11:19 PM
6

I completely agree with you. I've seen articles about "not all feminists" while joyfully calling "not all men" terrible. They don't give a shit about equality or what their movement has become, but then say men should support them nonetheless. And I heard a man who had a domestic abuse shelter held for men has committed suicide which was awful. MRA's do shit, it's not our fault that you can't see past your pathetic victim mentality.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 08:41 PM
4

That sounds pretty toxic, I'll be sure to keep my distance.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 08:10 PM
4

Actually they are still wrong by a technically: MGTOW isn't a group. It's a philosophy/ideology. The behaviour of the people that follow the MGTOW philosophies are of their own individual behaviour. Another person corrected me, I apologize for that. I should've looked deeper instead of blocking them off and calling it a day.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:43 PM
6

Once they're nice and comfy with the luxury men created for them over the years, then they'll start whining and complaining. Though I continue to see some posts demanding such luxuries to continuously be bestowed upon them with no questions. How are you independent women enjoying the microphone men created?
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:27 PM
7

Oh geez, their reaction to female pedophiles/abusers? I don't think I want to combust, I'm good. I'm glad you're not those white knights desperate to lick pussy so they adhere to anything a woman says. I've had good and bad relationships with women (I guess mostly because the female image hasn't been tainted publically) so I can't really bring myself to speak so poorly on them, and it's also hypocritical and not progressive in the slightest. Feminists complain about male-dominated areas and stil…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:19 PM
11

Thank you for the clarification, I thought my view of MGTOW was a little wrong and slightly biased so I apologize. I agree, MGTOW and Feminism can do numbers of beneficial things if the rotten apples will step to the side, however, the reason I refuse to sympathize to partake in feminism is that their hypocrisy really stings to the point I don't want to lose more brain cells. But it was unfair to put MGTOW on the same standard.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:10 PM
9

I mean, I don't like to admit I'm wrong sometimes. I think the difference is how you react to it. Mockery in replacement for a valid argument/apology, or shrugging it off for the sake of your ego (me).
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:43 PM
2

I won't stop supporting the MRA's ofc, and I know the woman you referenced! She's really good with her points and I admire her as an MRA
/r/MensRights08/10/19 12:32 AM
4

That honestly is true. Even if I'm constantly on some sort of device, I'm obviously blinded by the normalized sexism that is constantly being shared, or unable to say something against it. I feel like I have an advantage as a black woman (I hate using it as that but nobody would listen to me) but I feel like I won't help men have their voices get heard if I talk for them. Idk now I'm rambling but really nice thought food you gave me.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:00 PM
3

wtf i love that I'll use that now
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:56 PM
3

Where do you people find these clowns?
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:46 PM
0

Ignoring the fact that a baby doesn't have sexual feelings when trying to obtain food, and literally cannot suck your nipple unless presented with it. Nothing sexual about it when your b r e a s t f e e d i n g or you have some problems.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 12:37 AM
28

"He sucked on my nipple, and didn't stop even when I told him to. I was groaning from all the pain, what is consent nowadays!" Regardless of the fact that she's the guardian and sucking on a nipple is not sexual, I think that this should have more attention considering how harmful it is!!
/r/MensRights25/09/19 10:29 PM
2

Why is progressivism so forced nowadays? "I don't want to rationalize or hear anyone's opinion, nor do I try to make an effort to even convince you of mine so I will block you and insult you!!" And then they come up with 29024+ names to call you.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 10:26 PM
9

The replies are people being outraged by this but the dislike/like ration doesn't even match up, not to mention that some of the good commenters sound like robots.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 11:29 PM
1

The statutory rape one hit so hard. I can't believe people even excuse minors having their innocence torn. Just because your brain is located in your genital doesn't that those who're assaulted should feel the same. Actually, all of this is utter garbage. Anyone who tries to excuse rape should.. Nevermind I don't advocate for violence. Let's just say.. Therapy.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 10:04 PM
5

The Emmett Till story is absolutely heartbreaking, yet the poor women who could decide not to come out about it because they hear that false rape allegations take a toll on a person. Says something about their story if it's not letting them talk.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 09:58 PM
11

I think she might have missed the part that "false" rape allegations ruin lives. Just a feminist desperately trying to ignore simple problems that men can face by twisting up their words because it's such a foreign idea that a man's life can be ruined. This is why I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 09:56 PM
1

I remember feeling like a wanted to cry from all the feminist articles going against MRA's and trying to condone it, or pretending they DESTROYED MRA's with their strawman episodes and ignorance.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 08:27 PM
6

For calling out women in their victim mentality, I was diagnosed with "internalized misogyny" by professional Tumblr feminists. I mean, better to have "internalized misogyny" than to have a victim complex.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 08:22 PM
2

It wasn't supposed to represent the majority, just a disclaimer for those who do such actions or witness them.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 08:19 PM
1

say sike right now
/r/MensRights22/09/19 01:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter