TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sulfamide Archive

View 0 posts and 127 comments by Sulfamide on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Not the point
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 07:21 PM
1

Seems like nobody knows what radical feminism is. Even radical feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 07:06 PM
–

I'm so glad I'm gay. It's like a nightmare over here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 06:56 PM
1

Women are manipulative.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 01:59 PM
4

Kinda are though
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:38 PM
0

If my sister constantly talked shit about me she wouldn't be my best friend, she would be my worst enemy. Same for women who talk shit about me without knowing me. when confronted by a stray dog with no leash, we do not take the chance to see if its friendly the majority of the time Ah what a joy to read
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 02:42 PM
2

That figure wasn't mine, I was just pointing out your shitty logic. But yeah the real figure is closer to 5%, with 1% of the men responsible for the vast majority of violent crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 02:40 PM
–

No notes. Although in the bottom of the barrel poor and uneducated men do get the short of the stick compared to poor and uneducated men, in the West at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:40 PM
–

That's a very small sample and even then most women would be powerless against an average man if they are not very highly trained.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:30 PM
–

Well yeah sure. It was more a tongue-in-cheek way to emphasize that the opinion you just expressed was definitely on the red pill side of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:29 PM
–

It is my understanding that one of the central tenets of the red pill is that men are only valued through their competence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:14 PM
1

Yes, as an answer to: Yup - god forbid you say men rape or men murder when they’re the primary demographic. But they sure do love swooping in with a “men built the world” and “men fight and die in wars” and “men work dangerous and important jobs.” When they’ve never built anything in their lives and sit behind a computer all day talking about how women have “easy jobs.”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:13 PM
–

It should though
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:12 PM
3

I accused them of having a flawed logic, not generalizing. And my last comment was about your flawed logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:05 PM
–

While much of what you're saying is true, being physically weaker and the constant harassment are very detrimental handicaps that men rarely comprehend, and it is so pervasive that you wouldn't trade for women's privileges if you had to experience it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:04 PM
–

Shouldn't your flair be red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:01 PM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1twwvub/misandry_is_more_prevalent_than_misogyny/oprjpbb/ https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1twwvub/misandry_is_more_prevalent_than_misogyny/oprj06r/ https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1twwvub/misandry_is_more_prevalent_than_misogyny/oprypn1/ https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1twwvub/misandry_is_more_prevalent_than_misogyny/ops2hh4/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:59 PM
-1

Men are rapists???
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:47 PM
4

The previous argument being... an opinion? Lol Nope, a demonstration
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:47 PM
1

There are many 1% statistics about pretty horrible stuff, whatever the gender. It's very easy to say hateful stuff using 1% statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:44 PM
0

Sure, but there are many hierarchical structures in the animal kingdom that determine access to reproduction, and there is probably some of it in human relationships. It's just stupid to try to perfectly match human society to animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:42 PM
4

It's a demonstration, even if it's not perfectly rigorous. Beats totally ignoring the previous argument and just stating an opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:38 PM
1

Oh my god I'm so glad I'm gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:35 PM
-1

Oh so if it's 1% in a tribe of 100 people it's fine but the bigger the total population the worse it is?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:31 PM
6

But they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:28 PM
8

The idea that men are superior is rooted in the hatred of women. As it was demonstrated in the comment you're replying to, it is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:28 PM
2

Okay so because a few egotistical machos say stuff about men and women's gender roles, it's okay to generalize about murder and rape???
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:26 PM
1

Well usually when women talk about dogs it's about how cute they are, not that they are natural killing machines. Also men are human beings, it seems that it's easy to forget these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:24 PM
2

Fair take
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 05:22 PM
2

I think in the matter of sex humans are beyond reproductive behavior and in the erotic teritorry, which is heavily influenced by society. That's why there's the concept of hook-up culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:10 AM
3

True, that's why may be women are better suited to take care of the children, while men go spread their seed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 09:29 AM
0

Pretty telling that women use this phrasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 09:28 AM
-1

I hope for your sake the men you date don't think of themselves so highly and of you so little that they would consider a date as a chance being given.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 12:12 AM
2

You're obligated to nothing. The phrase "give someone a chance" is so high horsey in this context. If I learned a man said that about me I would not approach him with a 10km long stick. Who would be so extraordinary and desirable that I would wish for them to "give me a chance"? The nerve... I am a worthy person and they should also think about impressing me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 12:06 AM
2

I only gave them a chance I could not imagine saying that of another human being that has not wronged me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 11:34 PM
0

And remove all agency from the woman, as always? Can't she defend herself alone?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 11:32 PM
11

Is the animal kingdom a good example of how society should work?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 11:30 PM
22

Yeah women get to react however they want to boundaries in the limits of the law. However I and everybody else get to judge their reaction, with judgements ranging from "reasonable" to "crazy bitch" and to treat them accordingly. Sorry honey can't control what others think of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:44 PM
37

Yes that's what OP meant with the title "Women don't like when men have healthy boundaries". They meant that women don't like when men have healthy boundaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 12:38 PM
1

I accepted it. You are the one who disingenuously claimed it was comparable to taking a hitchhiker or that it doesn't have the philosophical ramifications I talked about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:36 PM
1

You're forcing a connection where there is none. Really? You think? Let's follow your logic a bit. Elderly people are more at risk for errors and hence should be discriminated against when looking for a job. Uneducated people are more likely to commit crimes so we shouldn't rub shoulders with them. People with preexisting medical conditions are more at risks to get seriously ill so they shouldn't be covered by insurance. Fat people shouldn't be invited to the restaurant because they are at risk …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:14 PM
1

This has huge philosophical ramifications about how we treat the uneducated, the poor, the old, the ill, etc. And it doesn't look pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 04:30 PM
1

Yeah the thing is I don't judge people who've done thing wrong. Crazy, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:50 PM
1

If they're an asshole then it's warranted, if they're just confident then calling them an asshole is probably pettiness and envy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 05:46 PM
1

Oh my god
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 06:07 PM
1

Galperin et al. (2013) This is about pregnancy. Birth control fixes that. Roese et al. (2006) This study finds no real psychological differences. Again, the main culprit is pregnancy and time invested\ You've said it yourself for the other studies. So no argument agains casual sex. There is one thing that could make women regret casual sex. Misogynistic people like you who slutshame them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:19 PM
1

You are not the arbiter of what love is. Love takes many forms and fucking a stranger in a bathroom is also love.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 10:53 AM
1

Many people don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 10:52 AM
2

Well I'm culturally a muslim from muslim parents, so while I'm secretly a non believer I still participate in my community's religion. I think it gives me some perspective on the matters of love in the west. On one hand I am absolutely shocked by how the masculinist/redpill/fascist movement uses the same obscurantist ways islamists use to belittle women and corrupt relationships, and on the other I think it's such a shame how woke/leftist/liberal movements vilify men and make relationships with …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:11 AM
1

Oh yeah sorry if I misinterpreted it. I too think that willing to constantly please one's partner is extremely important. And it feels amazing to be served as well as being served, in different ways. I'm from muslim background and in my society usually it's an ugly misogynistic religious imperative, which I hate, so I get jumpy around those kind of words.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:37 AM
2

are willing to serve their man. Excuse me what?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:25 AM
1

I am deeply hurt that women would gatekeep such attractive qualities
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:00 PM
2

Since you're the exception and the norm is women wanting validation and entertainment, I don't think that's good advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:55 PM
5

Well, given that sexual crimes have never been lower, and misogyny has never been less acceptable, I'd say that it's because 1. single women are not socially incentivized to find a mate and 2. men as a whole are prejudiced against 3. for the first time a liberal society actively encourages gender segregation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:52 PM
1

Or maybe some people have more love to give than you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:00 PM
0

If by some miracles you find out that number is higher than average for their age it means they aren't a match to most men. Well, most men are sexist idiots then. I don't think they are, but if someone's sexual past is important to them, they might be. People value sex as a bonding experinece. Of course If you take your dates to a certain spot every single new date you get with a specific set up and preparation like a picnic on a handpicked hill with an entire mood set. Is that date even special…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:29 PM
0

At least you must be great at making friends!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:10 PM
1

Well believe it or not people who like sex are not leopards nor cheaters. That's a pretty bigoted and misogynistic view.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:09 PM
1

No, that would be a confident guy. An asshole is an asshole. If you think confident people are assholes, it may be a you problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:07 PM
4

A man telling me I'm handsome or cute out of the blue has at least 50% chance of having me in his bed in next 12 hours. A man not at least insinuating he's attracted to my physique has 0. I don't understand how you people work.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:06 PM
-1

They are equally disgusting, but in different ways. One is repulsive, the other pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:56 AM
0

This is amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:55 AM
2

People more likely to cheat tend to be more promiscuous. I find it very funny that Americans use the word "promiscuous" non ironically ; it's like a bad sitcom episode in a church. You people never really grew out of puritanism, did you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:50 AM
2

No, I disagree. There certain characteristics that make some people more easy to live with than others for a majority of people. Some other characteristics are cherry picked by people based on nonsensical reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:48 AM
5

And there it is! I date men, which makes the probability of approaching people like you and be called a creep for no reason close to zero, thank god.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:41 AM
27

"Can't a woman enjoy herself at a party without being bothered by creeps?"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:36 AM
6

I really feel stupid now defending men against misandry. My god how the West has fallen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 01:29 PM
10

be obedient to you yuck
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 12:45 PM
1

The role reversal make people talk about it, like we're doing now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 04:40 AM
1

Actually the topic is up for debate with arguments both for and against even in the scientific community. Your opinion is that it's not a science, and your opinion comes with bias. What debate are you talking about? You mean whether it follows the scientific method or not? The fact that it's up to debate is enough to disqualify it. And how can it be up to debate? Either it does or it doesn't. If you delve into its basics with a scientific background you immediately se that it doesn't. You are in…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 02:27 PM
3

And yet it's the place where most couples used to meet.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 02:50 AM
4

This is false. But it's true. Please show this definition. Show me yours first Therapists are not demigods, they are also subject to the scarcity of time. Not really though
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:03 AM
2

Because we don't and still are treated like we are?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:00 AM
9

Or work. And clubs? Are you crazy? Can't a girl have her fun night out without being bothered by men. Nah you only have college and that's it, sorry sweaty.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 11:57 PM
3

Maybe you would have bounced anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 11:55 PM
7

First, medical practice is tried and founded on the scientific method (albeit there is much to criticize to it, i.e. the reproducibility crisis). Psychology and psychiatry are not. Second, therapy is by definition supposed to be a very long process. Therapists justify this by simply citing empirical evidence. An other interpretation of this is that it simply doesn't work, most of the time. Third, doctors base their practice around the scarcity of their resources: time, equipment, medicine, patie…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 11:52 PM
1

I wish they were just silly little insults. But I think the idiot over there really thinks the smaller cerebral volume of women makes them less intellectually capable. The thing is, this kind of sexism is socially frowned upon, and I don't think that many men would subscribe to it. On the other hand, seriously saying that men are natural violent rapists is absolutely socially acceptable. Man v. Bear, crime statistics, testosterone, etc. These are all very misandrist topics that are openly discus…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 11:42 PM
1

I don't see what about this is contradictory with thinking for oneself
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 08:07 PM
1

What alternative do you propose?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 08:06 PM
1

First of all, many WOMEN use the testosterone argument as a way to essencialize men as mindless raping beasts. These are the same women that use the hormone argument to perpetuate the "emotional woman" stereotype, but in a way that fits them. Second, you didn't really explain what is reverse-misogyny, which leads me to believe that what you are doing is simply invalidating the experience of misandry, but would love to be proven wrong. It may be in part in response to misogyny, but I think it als…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 05:09 PM
6

I wouldn't think women are less intelligent because of brain volume, or any reason for what it's worth, that would be stupid. I wouldn't mind men saying such stupid things though, especially towards people making comments such as these.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:54 PM
–

Of course it does. Moving, breathing, speaking humans most of the time more attractive than pictures.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:02 PM
–

The thing is, it may be common for you, but it's not common in general. The reason is women are more comfortable being single (good for them), so they have less incentive to "give chances".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:00 PM
11

I would have been absolutely outraged by this kind of take a few years ago. But given that women have no problem with misandry such as treating men as mindless beasts where agression is in their testosterone-producing DNA, I think it's fair to go back women-are-stupid-because-of-their-smaller-brain style misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 03:30 PM
1

Oh sorry then I indeed interpreted that wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:52 PM
0

Well you said that you have the same thoughts about females and males while also stating that men have a biological compulsion to be violent and dominant. You said that my comment was an ad hominem attack when it wasn't. You said it was a rambling when it wasn't. So you stated untruths.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:42 PM
0

Not rambling, the logic is pretty easy to follow, the words are common and the phrases simple. And all you said in this tread is exactly basic men vs. women. Also do you know what ad hominem arguments are? You're really using the MAGA playbook by simply stating untruths about what is written in front of everyone's eyes and using buzzwords like "triggered". Because you can't really defend your position without taking unacceptable ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:30 PM
1

Not a recipe. Also people are not very comparable to fruits.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:17 PM
5

I have the same thoughts about all males and females. Evidently you don't. I’m in-group black so no black men don’t incite fear in me as much as it does you all. Black people, men or women, do not incite fear in me, because I don't let my prejudice guide my judgement of people, and I don't try to back it up with "statistics" As far as Gaza… you bastardized the fuck out of my comment if that’s your interpretation. I didn’t “justify.” I explained the causal history. You can deny it all you want, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:16 PM
3

That doesn't really sound the same as your earlier comment but if that's your honest position then I'm glad it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 05:09 PM
1

It's a strawman for stopping misandrist discourse, like I just typed. It's in the comment just above yours. It doesn't make sense otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:43 PM
1

No, your precedent comment was a strawman associating stopping misandrist discourse (like what you just said) with not wanting to reduce violent crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:27 PM
6

This turning into bad faith. Are you trying to tire me? Is this immediate reality-denying MAGA tactic? you’re comparing criminal or abusive behaviour Following. Cornering. Not taking no. Getting aggressive. Ignoring boundaries. But when women say “we’re exercising caution,” safety precautions you’re talking about The same logic applies when you lock your door, avoid dark parking lots, or meet dates in public first. directly declaring that men are not safe You say don’t lump us in, but bad men do…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:25 PM
1

The only people enjoy submitting are men. They love to have a men tell them what to do. Thats why men try to force women into submission with violence. Maybe men shouldnt control anything anymore if their baseline is always just violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:58 PM
2

No, you clearly crossed the gap very quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:50 PM
8

Again, you're comparing criminal or abusive behaviour of a few men to the standard behaviour of women. And behaviour I was talking about is not the safety precautions you're talking about. It's you directly declaring that men are not safe because statistically they are more likely to be violent than women. If it was okay to say it about any other group (like black people for crime statistics for example), I would accept it. I wouldn't like it, because I think it's discriminatory and a breeding g…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:48 PM
9

There is a a huge gap between still trying to go towards zero violent crime (which is impossible), and painting men as becoming more bloodthirsty beasts by default as time advances.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:38 PM
6

Women being cautious around strangers isn’t targeting men as a class, it’s reacting to uncertainty in a situation. You're trying to steer this to strangers, which, if it was your real intention, would make me glad. But you clearly stated that it was towards men specifically. One is “I don’t know this person yet.” The other is “I’ve decided who you are.” Those aren’t the same thing. Knowing someone reduces the prejudice towards them. You're just twisting words to try to distance your behaviour fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:15 PM
16

That African Americans over-index on crime because they uniquely have over-indexed on receiving centuries worth of state-sanctioned disenfranchisement, brutality, chattel slavery, and dehumanization from this country. It’s basic cause and effect. You treat people like animals for that long and take away their access to education as a tactic to keep them subservient, many are going to act like what they act like. It’s called generational trauma. Then why not justify the Gaza massacre with the Hol…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:13 PM
8

Prejudice is deciding who someone is before you know them. . We don’t know who’s safe until we know . Discrimination is denying people access, rights, or opportunities. That’s not the same thing as personal safety choices. Discrimination doesn't need to be state-sponsored (and actually, it is, albeit there is no point in arguing about the government as long as fascists are in power). Personal safety is fine, everyone is free to be as cautious as they want. But that's not how you are preventing i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:01 PM
2

I would be stupid to not agree with it. What I'm pointing out is 1. How dumb it is to think that the problem is women not equals being criminals, and 2. The double standard that makes it okay to discriminate men based on statics but as soon as it is a minority then statistics are biased and they are the result of systemic oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:51 PM
13

Okay so, honest question what in your opinion a good counter argument to the aforementioned racist dog whistle? And I sure hope you are ready the same rigueur and moral standing when analyzing your own misandrist dog whistle.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:42 PM
0

So you know that some men can romantically love each other and still not think all men are criminals?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:36 PM
7

"Stranger danger", not "brown people danger" or "men danger". That's what makes it not fascist. Do you know what the words "prejudice" and "discrimination" mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:05 PM
13

You can deny the existence of the argument as much as you want to try to hide your failure to engage it, it still stands. You're not describing personal precautions, you're actively discriminating against half the population based on your prejudice. You are using the crimes of the few to justify treating the whole as criminals. You know, like collective punishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:59 PM
21

No, you would need to flip most of the words and add a lot more for it to become a banana bread recipe. The few words you need to flip for it to become an alt-right tagline shows how fascist-adjacent your reasoning is. That's what I'm arguing. That what you said is fascist. I thought it was obvious but on second thought it is quite common for that side of the political spectrum to have a really hard time either subtlety.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:47 PM
1

I think I may have misunderstood your point because I cannot believe it to be serious. Your problem is that crime is... gendered? Who cares about the gender of perpetrators? They are criminals who should be put out of society. Are you saying that it would be better if there were more women attackers because then what? We would be even? You would push the gender war to this point?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:26 PM
1

We must be in Saudi Arabia because apparently gay men don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:22 PM
20

Flip a few words and this would be an amazing pitch for a far right demagogue.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:20 PM
16

There this dog whistle in the fascosphere that begins with "despite making up only 13% of the population..." And now there's this "simply observing patterns and trends" which sound a lot like "simply asking questions". I sure hope this is a case of "vocal minority not representing reality" because, contrary to some people, I cannot fathom half the people in world being this despicable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:18 PM
2

Oh I didn't notice it was a woman. You're right it's quite an unusual request from a woman. And surely some women might give better advice than men about what men actually prefer. I agree. Actually I would disagree with that. I think women are less inclined to reveal their true preference compared to men, because many of these true preferences (for men and women) are very ingrained in gender roles and patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:24 PM
0

Maybe, but like for dick size, there is a threshold.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 04:54 PM
10

No, because of the difference between stated preference and revealed preference Some experienced men might give better advice than women about what women prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 04:51 PM
2

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:17 PM
3

The red pill approach is quite irrational in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 06:12 PM
-1

Then what's this has to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 03:56 PM
0

The answer was stupid I agree but not the question. People interact with other people, share experiences and secrets with friends, they gossip. It's pretty interesting to compare anecdotal evidence to sociological statistics since those can be pretty flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 03:54 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with being slutty. It's not a consequence of anything, it's just a normal behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 03:53 PM
3

You can complain that society is harsh and that progressives abandoned you and victimize you without subscribing to the red pill rethoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 03:44 PM
2

That's a different topic
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 03:32 PM
10

It's fine to sexualize people as long as you don't make them uncomfortable. It's called freedom of thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 03:30 PM
2

I hope these good examples don't find them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:16 AM
5

Couldn't agree with the first part but the second part is absolutely true. The capacity of women to take care of people other than themselves and empathising with oppressed or distressed people is amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:15 AM
7

That is... extremely surprising. I'm a gay man, and I've experienced the exact opposite with my mother, sister (who are the best people in the world and whom I love so much), and girl friends. I am usually the the rock they lean into, and the few times I showed signs of weakness (long hidden depression, health problems, other compulsive mental health problems, har breakups), their reactions range from shock and not knowing what to do, to at least temporary ghosting. Maybe because I'm usually mas…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:10 AM
0

I don't think most guys are abusive. That's a surprising, rare, and welcome opinion, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 08:58 AM
3

Idont see how thats related? I'm happy to explain: ugly abusive guys are the ones who are exposed and shamed. The pretty ones fly under the radar. So to conclude, a good personality is in no way a requirement for getting a relationship with a nice lady. It might be for you, but it's not a general rule at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 08:52 AM
5

Objectively untrue and directly contradictory with how widespread abusive relationships are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 08:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter