TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SunRaSquarePants Archive

View 9 posts and 62 comments by SunRaSquarePants on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Well, also, the article defines incels as those who "forge their sense of identity around a perceived inability to form sexual or romantic relationships.” So, if you are literally involuntarily celibate, I guess you aren't an incel unless you "forge your identity around it." But what does that even mean? Does talking about it qualify? What about talking about it privately to your therapist? It's as if they're creating a Schrodinger's Incel, where you aren't an incel if you don't admit it. Suffer…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 07:47 PM
2

Relationships are about intimacy, hook ups are about adventure. The two aren't interchangeable, and adventure is a sorry substitute for intimacy. When you expect fidelity and you're betrayed, it makes you doubt yourself, and consider that you may be naive beyond belief, and that's actually a very uncomfortable state in which to engage in adventure. Consider that you've been pushed into a natural trauma response, and you're probably willing to try almost anything to escape that situation, includi…
/r/MenSupportMen31/10/22 03:26 AM
2

I wish this book had been around when I was your age: https://www.amazon.com/How-Fail-Almost-Everything-Still-ebook/dp/B00COOFBA4 I think this point in your life is the perfect time to read it and use some of the principals to orient yourself while you make plans for your next step into the future.
/r/MenSupportMen07/10/22 06:44 PM
7

For me, alcohol lessens anxiety, but only while I'm actively drinking. The next day, the anxiety gets worse, and if I keep drinking every night, it becomes unbearable. Soon after breaking the cycle of nightly drinking, the improvement in my anxiety is so pronounced that I just don't want to go back to drinking. Many people have a good outcome using psychedelics to break the cycle.
/r/MenSupportMen18/09/22 08:09 AM
1

Sure, that makes sense, I'm just reacting to this in terms of my own personal life experience. I would warn against relationships at career path jobs, while I would grant a level of leeway for relationships at young person jobs, where it's still not the best idea assuming you want to keep that job, but the stakes are lower. And learning how to be around people who've rejected you and not let it become a big deal can be a healthy part of maturation. But still, I mostly agree with your point there…
/r/MenSupportMen17/09/22 09:45 PM
2

You made an extremely common mistake What was the mistake?
/r/MenSupportMen17/09/22 08:41 PM
3

Check out Alan Watt's talk entitled "A Game That's Worth The Candle" The ability to connect with the suffering of the great minds of history has definitely helped me to contextualize my own suffering. When you suffer, you're never suffering alone.
/r/MenSupportMen10/09/22 04:34 PM
1

What do you think about it? It hit so close to home for me
/r/MenSupportMen16/07/22 03:17 AM
1

Do you want me to delete this?
/r/MenSupportMen16/07/22 02:28 AM
6

It might be a good idea to go back to therapy and discuss why you felt compelled to engage with the drama beyond what was required to remove yourself from the situation.
/r/MenSupportMen15/06/22 07:31 PM
16

Who wouldn't want to eat a sandwich that already had 47 dicks in it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/05/20 06:05 PM
13

Might I recommend multivariate analysis. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/19 11:01 PM
120

There's a bar by my house with 2 bathrooms: gender neutral, and women. Oakland, California.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/19 04:27 PM
2

Court of Appeal judge Lady Justice Nicola Davies DBE backed this view in December 2018, writing in her judgment that it was "morally unacceptable to regard a child as a financial liability". incredible.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:21 PM
2

I think it's about weighing the benefits against the drawbacks. This place is for people who pretty clearly feel the drawbacks outweigh the benefits on a personal level.
/r/MGTOW06/12/18 11:26 PM
1

You saying that has made me try to actually see the converse argument in a way that I can understand the argument for... I think it's something like, "you can call it a 'civil union,' but 'marriage' is a religious term for holy union for procreation." And so while that argument wouldn't hold water for me, I think it's very much analogous to the idea of cultural appropriation, which also doesn't really hold water. I'd had cultural appropriation explained to me in the context of ceremonial signifi…
/r/MGTOW31/08/18 09:14 PM
34

I've been single for about 5 years now, and in light of that, both my parents told me it's ok with them if I'm gay. I'm in my 40s.
/r/MGTOW11/06/18 05:23 AM
1

Your numbers got a bit off, and your math is a bit off. the generation has 40 different fathers and 80 different mothers. Each individual has 2 grandmothers and 2 grandfathers, 4 greatgrandmothers and 4 greatgrandfathers, 8 greatgreat... and so on. If you reduce the influence of one gender, you’re also reducing the genetic impact of previous generations. Yes, that is the implication. The implication is that genes passed on to a male are only passed on 40% of the time, and for females it's 80%, a…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 11:04 PM
1

It doesn't work that way, the number of grandparents remains constant. Someone doesn't have more or fewer grandparents just because they have more or fewer children. The genes will be passed on 80% on the female side, and 40% on the male side. If 40% of the males have one offspring, that offspring is getting half their genes from the father, but the other half of their genes from one of the 80% of females' genes from another line.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 12:21 AM
1

If a smaller number of men reproduce, and have greater representation, then their female ancestors are represented simply because their male descendant is. If I follow what you're saying, perhaps it can be cleared up this way: Greater representation means siring more offspring; 1 representation equals 1 offspring. Out of our perfect imaginary sample of 100 men and 100 women, 60 men have no children, and 20 women have no children. So, if the remaining 80 women get together and have 80 children wi…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:03 PM
1

The “single most underappreciated fact about gender,” he said, is the ratio of our male to female ancestors. While it’s true that about half of all the people who ever lived were men, the typical male was much more likely than the typical woman to die without reproducing. Citing recent DNA research, Dr. Baumeister explained that today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men. Maybe 80 percent of women reproduced, whereas only 40 percent of men did. source
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:58 AM
1

Roughly, 80 percent of women reproduced, whereas only 40 percent of men did. edit: sorry if this is making people mad, I tried to make it clear. I don't have an agenda here.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:21 AM
-3

In evolutionary terms, a vagina, with it's baby making capabilities, is far more valuable in its role than the penis. This is why you have 2 times the number of female ancestors as male ancestors. You could think of it loosely in terms of every vagina being important, but only half the penises being important. So, it's not too surprising that there's a current social reflection of this biological mechanism that goes largely unnoticed. It's pretty sad. I hate it when people make fun of or shame i…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:20 PM
0

LOL you lost me at Identity + Politics = Identity Politics. It might be, but that's weak as shit, because neither of those undermine my points, or my definition. So, it's hard to see you doing anything other than just spinning out right now. Vent in therapy, keep it together in dialectic and debate.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:56 AM
1

You're awfully arrogant and sure of your position for how tenuous that position is. I'm willing to bet that the reason you didn't actually include these dictionary definitions is that they don't actually undermine my points. You seem perfectly willing to voice your tepid musings without any rigorous investigation, and then you have trouble backing up what your saying in any way that makes cohesive sense. It's fine to go to the mat to explain the validity of your interpretations, but you've sent …
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:38 AM
1

MRA does have identity politics. It is a movement seeking political change for a certain group of individuals. That is not the definition of identity politics. I've said what I think it has the potential to be. And this is exactly what I think you're dead wrong about, and I've been trying to tell you exactly why I think you're wrong. I disagree that for it to be identity politics it must be seeking equal outcome not equal opportunity. This is bone-headed. How can you think that a group who wants…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:56 PM
0

I can't tell if you're missing the point repeatedly on purpose, or because you don't have a choice. You're claiming I claimed you claimed things I never claimed. I can't keep track of your meta-misunderstandings. but the other two literally have it in their name and that has been indicative of their missions since they were formed. You can have any group of people seeking equal rights for individuals. So, no it doesn't necessarily follow that people are seeking special rights or special status j…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 03:51 PM
1

Perhaps feminism and BLM did become about identity politics when that was not their goal See what I did there? I left it open to interpretation. It may not have started out about identity politics, (perhaps it did), but it certainly is about identity politics now. My point is that an argument can be made that neither of these movements started out as identity politics, while alt-right certainly did start out as identity politics. Regardless, both sides are firmly routed in identity politics at t…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:49 AM
0

It's not going to become like "BLM or feminist," because it is already that at its heart. Perhaps feminism and BLM did become about identity politics when that was not their goal, but the alt right is founded on identity politics. You can not separate the alt right from identity politics. Identity politics is bigotry. There is no principled stance that justifies bigotry. It will never grow out of being about hate, and I can't think of a single example of a group founded on identity politics that…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 12:36 AM
-1

I think this is a pretty ham-fisted analysis. It's associated with the hate movements because that's currently the outlet they have to have a voice If your movement gives voice to hate, it is a hate movement. but I think it will grow and leave the hate groups behind as it matures. By what mechanism??? The alt-right is founded on identity politics. The phrase was coined by self-identified white nationalist Richard Spencer. It's going to be even harder for a movement that also has a racial compone…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 08:41 PM
1

The political spectrum isn't shaped like a line, it's shaped like a horseshoe, with far left and far right on the same side of the identity politics boundary.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 08:28 PM
1

Two of the signs in that picture indicate Latina women. Are Latinos no longer considered POC by the SJW?
/r/MGTOW11/11/16 08:57 PM
7

I'm glad we rely on evidence instead of misogyny misandry you see here. ftfy
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/16 11:01 PM
13

From the Herald: after bravely posting a photograph of her bruised and swollen face, the result of an unprovoked Boxing Day attack and It followed an altercation at a nightclub where Mr Rudder allegedly spat in Ms Merrick’s face before she pushed him over From The Mercury: Mr Eckhold watched CCTV footage of what happened next and found that Ms Merrick had assaulted Mr Rudder by grabbing him to the throat and throwing him to the ground. and ​Mr Rudder told the court he then spat at Ms Merrick, wh…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/16 05:17 PM
1

The issue isn't higher taxes vs lower taxes. The issue is that the taxes aren't being used appropriately. Without the government (aka we the people) we are ruled by our military overlords. Actual Democracy (direct democracy) is a good thing. The government should be exactly the size of the population, not a small elite group concerned with implementing and collecting taxes.
/r/MGTOW26/07/16 09:41 PM
1

People think passing high taxes and getting nothing in return is a liberal vs conservative issue? That is one good reason why we're fucked. It's not liberals or conservatives, that's just the way our government is set up. Politics is the PR department of the military, and as long as the people in government make huge swaths of money from military contracts, that is where our tax money will go. Don't hand over your life to ideologies that will allow someone else to tell you your choices. Go your …
/r/MGTOW26/07/16 06:23 PM
7

here's a litmus test you can use to see if what you're saying might be offensive to someone. I think the method is self-explanatory. The reason the phrase is "teach blacks not to steal" is because a large percentage of the offenders in theft cases are black. That isn't an implication onto all blacks. You shouldn't feel attacked by it. It's just a response to the statistics.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 06:39 PM
17

The rape of a male by a female is often not prosecuted.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 06:28 PM
3

Fire Island
/r/MGTOW13/07/16 05:09 AM
1

Funny, it's what turned me into a radical.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 06:52 AM
1

And "feminist/communist" That's not a singular idea, but it sort of is, just not in the way you mean it. Edit: comedy
/r/MensRights15/05/16 06:40 AM
1

An image is fine if you aren't interested in seeing the new comments as they are added.
/r/MGTOW12/04/16 03:03 AM
3

I haven't ever used archive.is. It sounds like a good suggestion. I'm sure I'm not the only one in this sub who would appreciate a psa post giving us the play by play. And if it noticeably increases the functionality of the sub, you might see it stickied or added to the side bar.
/r/MGTOW11/04/16 11:33 PM
2

I appreciate your concern, and because I see the validity in it, I edited in a relevant link in an attempt to mitigate any damage.
/r/MGTOW11/04/16 09:21 PM
4

There was a np link to a post that felt generally pretty abusive toward husbands in a sub that doesn't allow men to comment. The OP from the original post came to this sub to defend her original post and deliver some insulting language. Some user(s) here changed the np to www and took the argument into the original post. The mod in that sub threw gas on the fire by unfairly characterizing MGTOW as TRP sex slave misogyny, then deleted all replies and temporarily locked the post. One of the MGTOW …
/r/MGTOW11/04/16 09:17 PM
2

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swingin'+dick
/r/MGTOW11/04/16 08:36 PM
6

You seem to be missing something about what's happening here, or perhaps I'm missing something about what you're saying. The purpose of making a post NP is to prevent it from becoming an interaction of trying to impose one set of values over another, while still discussing it within a specific discourse community. And Of.Course.We.Care. MGTOW is NOT a movement of people putting on the blinders to the truths of the world. MGTOW is a movement based on careful insight and exploration of damaging so…
/r/MGTOW11/04/16 08:29 PM
2

"A Swinging dick" is a slang term for a man, not the same as "hey you dicks," in this case, it's a term of endearment
/r/MGTOW11/04/16 08:06 PM
1

Dang, that's really too bad.
/r/MGTOW11/04/16 05:50 PM
14

The purpose of this sub is not to be abusive, or to start shit. Please move forward in a way that cultivates exactly the type of life interactions, and internal and external positive focus, you are choosing this path in order to maintain.
/r/MGTOW11/04/16 05:15 PM
20

Alright, men, you heard the lady, this is what a partnership of mutual respect and clear communication looks like to a married woman. Who wants in?
/r/MGTOW10/04/16 07:06 PM
16

He gets up early to go to work on a beautiful Sunday morning, and his wife is LIVID because he drove the wrong car to work- even after she told home not to... via a text message in the middle of the night, while he was sleeping. And then cut to the comments, and it's like co-support for abusive wives. Can you imagine the back lash to a husband's post: "men, do any of you have wives that never listen?" At any rate, I feel sorry for that guy, because when I get up on Sunday morning, you know what …
/r/MGTOW10/04/16 05:44 PM
47

Riiiiiiiiight, and lesbian sex isn't sex because no penetration?
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:16 PM
16

This article is presented as though discrimination is the driving market force, rather than supply and demand. And what we see here is that women are willing to pay A LOT more than men for the same product. I don't know if being more frugal is a evolutionary gender thing, or a cultural thing where men are taught to think about taking responsibility and making do with less, while women are taught to think "I'm worth it." Or maybe it's something else. Regardless, what we see is that women are will…
/r/MGTOW27/12/15 05:00 PM
6

endless pain that leads only to a painful end.
/r/MGTOW21/12/15 09:42 PM
16

WTF "white trash" - an offensive American term referring to poor white people following the Great Depression If you're going to define something no one asked you to define, at least do two fucking seconds of research before you fill people's heads with garbage.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/15 04:22 AM
6

I would be interested in seeing the amount of money spent marketing to key demographics, and how that relates to suicide. 15-19 is a massive target demographic, where as after 35, the nature and quantity of marketing directed at the individual changes dramatically. From 15 to 19, the media offers many different male archetypes as possibilities to engender, including the non-conformist archetype, making it nearly impossible not to be marketed to in some way. By age 40, however, it seems as though…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:56 PM
7

Alternately, if you can't control your emotions, you should only play video games.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/15 01:33 AM
4

People, both good and bad, will reveal themselves through their actions. It is impossible to know people right away, but it impossible for people to conceal themselves for long.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 07:02 AM
1

I don't know who discovered water, but t certainly wasn't a fish.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:19 PM
1

I think the title is a little confusing, the author is not saying there are more candidates who qualify, but that the candidates are more qualified. I hope that helps!
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:46 PM
13

Fb is like a slot machine. Watch the posts scroll by, something that makes you feel bad comes up? Better keep scrolling until that dopamine-releasing post is found... And since that was pretty good, might as well keep going. At least this was how it worked for me. I had to quit cold turkey when I realized how negatively it was impacting me. A few months after quitting, I found out about the social experiment to increase negative posts on fb and I realized that was something that deeply effected …
/r/MGTOW04/01/15 07:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter