TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SundaySermon Archive

View 0 posts and 119 comments by SundaySermon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

You give that sales pitch and don’t post a link?
/r/RedPillWomen21/01/23 11:47 PM
4

“Common” probably isn’t the right word. And it’s not necessarily as overt as you might be imagining. I’m not talking about Daygame here. But I live in a major American city, work in a large office with a coveted knowledge work job, and primarily associate with successful college grads.
/r/RedPillWomen21/01/23 02:25 AM
5

What treatment are you referring to? In general? During sex?
/r/RedPillWomen20/01/23 11:58 PM
13

I flirt with women in public all the time. It’s fine.
/r/RedPillWomen20/01/23 11:12 PM
7

All good, dude. This sub is all about being your best self. Reach out to me in the new year and let me know how things are going.
/r/RedPillWomen24/12/22 01:28 AM
18

You’ve got a few self-limiting beliefs here. First, there certainly are quality women in your area who will date you if you’re making under $150k. Second, you absolutely can find another, much much higher paying job based on your experiences over the last few years. Yeah, there’s going to be a learning curve. That’s every new job. My advice? Look up some people on LinkedIn who have a job you want and could conceivably do in the next two years. Invite them to coffee or a zoom call. Figure what it…
/r/RedPillWomen24/12/22 01:03 AM
6

Is it your job? Or is it your career path? Certainly you could get close to 150k with a few job hops over the next couple of years. Also, is Philly really that picky? I’m in a higher COL city and 150k certainly isn’t a prerequisite.
/r/RedPillWomen24/12/22 12:50 AM
7

Others have mentioned MRP. It's certainly more helpful than the main sub, but still comes across as juvenile at times. I wish there were a better community for men focused on self-improvement, pro-masculinity and male-led relationships. Or even co-ed red-pilled community that aims for common ground on those topics.
/r/RedPillWomen28/08/22 08:10 PM
1

Has a car In many parts of the world, a car really isn't necessary. And in major American cities like New York and Chicago, you might just be throwing away money if you have one. I know absurdly successful guys that haven't owned a car in over a decade. Which is to say, don't take this list literally. The goal should be to take care of yourself. Define that by what makes sense in your current situation.
/r/seduction10/08/22 12:23 PM
0

I hate those pompous snobby elites, their noses turned, caviar in hand asking, “Wanna smash?”
/r/seduction02/01/22 02:57 AM
2

“sooo do you pee red?” 😬
/r/seduction22/12/21 07:26 PM
2

If a first date doesn't go to a second date, the most common reason is a lack of sexual/physical attraction. Have you ever had a pleasant first date with good convo and laughs to just be ghosted? Chances are she looked across the table for 5ish seconds and thought "not fucking this guy." This is something I struggle with. I've been catcalled (by women), been eye-fucked by really good-looking ones, etc. But I've had so many dates where I can tell it's just DOA. I think it's more about vibe than p…
/r/seduction21/12/21 10:01 PM
2

Anecdotally, I used to approach women with a friend who was a male model. He almost exclusively tried this approach until he realized it never worked and he’d need to have a real conversation first.
/r/seduction01/12/21 08:27 PM
3

I feel like Pete Davidson's the one we need to watch.
/r/seduction26/11/21 06:41 PM
1

Will you say who the bootcamp was with? Was it just going out at night, or day approaches as well?
/r/seduction10/09/20 02:17 PM
1

What venues have worked for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 04:36 PM
1

The problem with cold approaching women is that 90%+ of men don't do it correctly Yes. Women will signal if they are ready to be approached. Watch for the eyes and body language and you can be reasonably sure of what her feelings/intentions are. No. Guys who are good at this very rarely look for indicators of interest. The best, most natural are able to build those connections organically. Do they fall on their faces? All the time. But they're regularly getting dates with women who didn't notice…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 02:00 PM
1

It's why I roll my eyes whenever people bring up those OKCupid studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 01:49 PM
4

Obama's a good model for a lot of what you discussed – lifestyle, values, passion. And if it works for you, definitely try to play up some of your more erudite qualities. Keep in mind, however, that what we see really is a performance. That's not a criticism of the guy. That's just modern politics. His speeches are crafted to work in a stadium of 10,000, or across TV airwaves. (That's something both U.S. parties have had to grapple with during this summer's conventions: how do you appeal to crow…
/r/seduction26/08/20 04:34 PM
1

What I'm basically getting at is correlation =/= causation. Sure, bullies are dominant – maybe they're displaying these "dark triad" traits. I won't argue that that doesn't explain some of it. But who is more likely to be out at parties at 14 – the bully or the bullied? They're putting themselves into situations where sex is available. Situations that a lot of other young kids honestly wouldn't be even thinking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/20 02:10 AM
1

I get that, and there's absolutely truth to it. I just think these studies would benefit from a more holistic perspective of these kids' social environments.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/20 08:57 PM
1

Around 17? Yeah, I'm not surprised. But that says nothing about frequency or number of partners. And there's also the "younger adolescent" cohort in these studies, who are having sex at 13, 14, 15. I'm still arguing that bullies are going to be in positions to get more sex from more people – by virtue of how they socialize in addition to their personalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/20 07:19 PM
3

I have a lot of issues with these "bully" studies. They're comparing young adolescents (~14) to older adolescents (~18) and determining that bullies get more sex. It's kind of weird to study. Not everyone has access to sex at 14, 15. But bullies are probably also hanging out with girls who will give it to them at that age. On top of that, they're learning to exude confidence and dominance at a young age – and that' something that will stick with them. There's a couple other studies that compare …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/20 06:20 PM
1

Thanks for the clarification. Yes, this is pointless. Especially repeated across 300 women.
/r/seduction30/07/20 06:30 PM
2

the odds of you getting a date by just going up to a random girl that doesn’t know you is slim to none. This is false.
/r/seduction30/07/20 05:24 PM
3

Last summer, I was in your exact situation, except I was the 25-year-old male customer. Even my female friends commented how much the barista flirted with me. I happened to show up on her last day, when she gave me very explicit instructions to find her new bakery job on the other side of town. I wanted to get her number, but her coworker was lingering and I didn't want to make a scene. Obviously, I could have gone for it that last day. And I'm still kicking myself that I didn't. But how would y…
/r/seduction23/07/20 02:48 PM
2

Glad this conversation could go somewhere.
/r/seduction22/07/20 02:49 AM
1

why the first thing about you she needs to know is your name? Do you know what an introduction is? Also you introuducing yourself and complimenting is dead end. If you don't have conversation skills. You need a decent level of social ability to succeed in this – extemporaneous, without a script. This is almost exclusively how I approach and my interactions are long enough and deep enough.
/r/seduction22/07/20 02:19 AM
2

Honestly, you're not too far off from things I've woven into conversations. And I mean you specifically in this situation. Early on, I would do a bit where I'd try to guess a woman's personality based on the Starbucks drink she was holding. It was a barely glorified cheesy pick-up line, but I could think fast enough on my feet to make it entertaining. And a lot of the time, I would charm a woman enough that I could tell she liked it. I really don't use this anymore, but it was actually kind of f…
/r/seduction21/07/20 08:43 PM
7

I'll admit, you bring up some good points. And if you can naturally treat this like a conversation, it's not awful. It's a written out script – and granted, many early conversations are scripts – but it is true to /u/BroCast97. But look, so many guys are going to come on here, see your script and go to a mall trying to have this same conversation with 5 – 15 different women. That's not sincere. And I think sharing scripts like this encourages that type of behavior. I remember the comment you're …
/r/seduction21/07/20 08:35 PM
8

First, it's just cowardly. You should be aiming to push aside your fears and boldly tell her what you want. Second, it's almost duplicitous. You're tricking her into giving you her attention, then switching gears to trying to get her number. At least with a situational opener, you're giving the hope of a conversation, a human connection. That's what you should be aiming to do – giving women a nice moment and some conversation. I almost only do direct approach and it works out great. I highly rec…
/r/seduction21/07/20 08:13 PM
7

Don't do this. If you can't say something situational, just tell her you wanted to meet her.
/r/seduction21/07/20 08:03 PM
2

"Just be nice" isn't necessarily awful. It just lacks a lot of context of explanation.
/r/seduction14/07/20 12:05 PM
0

Wow u/sundaysermon way to speak on behalf of women. This is a fair point. Although please understand I wasn't exactly trying to speak for women, but rather caution him from taking this route to get advice. I personally don't think it's the best. Keep in mind, I linked out to a woman's point of view – and gave no comment on that content specifically. My only points were that there are more effective perspectives to gain if you truly want to advance. Given his situation, he's better off asking a m…
/r/seduction12/07/20 04:58 PM
22

Here's a recent discussion on it. I'm a man, but here's a few things to keep in mind: Most women aren't experiencing approaches from guys who know what they're doing. Usually, it's a nervous dude trying to shoot his shot, or (much more rarely) it's someone who's watched a pick-up video and wants to try out something they really don't know how to do. Women are almost always going to tell you what to say. But so much of cold approach is non-verbal and how you project confidence. You won't get any …
/r/seduction12/07/20 04:40 PM
1

They are the whipped cream on the sundae, not the sundae itself. But they discuss “female nature” and “methods” to such a degree they make the whole sundae out of whipped cream. Stealing this. What's your podcast?
/r/seduction10/07/20 08:02 PM
2

Nowadays these fucking choads get their panties in a bunch over sending a DM to some chick they don’t even know whom they will never fuck. I'll empathize with someone who might have social anxiety or some or other issue that's amplifying the stress they feel. But it's really hard to when they're taking such an absurd approach. what they seek has been with them the whole time. Interestingly, I've seen more guys admit that they read "The Game" in their 20s and that's what set themselves on a path …
/r/seduction10/07/20 06:54 PM
2

You're right. Go out, socialize, meet women. Even OP did that – and succeeded in that he got a marriage out of it. Most of the time, guys who get into cold approach either have very little luck with women, would like to significantly boost the quality and quantity of women they meet or both. So, they either have below average social skills (or some other bottleneck), or are trying to do something that is very difficult which a small percentage of men actually accomplish. Either way, you need som…
/r/seduction10/07/20 05:54 PM
1

Learning to copy their shit. That’s what most guys are looking to do. This isn't a problem with the youtube personality. It's a problem with the person themself. Granted, far too many channels encourage regurgitating lines and following a step-by-step guides. I have a hunch this is exactly who OP went after. Plenty do the opposite. The YouTube channel I pointed to is one that actively discourages scripts and even refrains from posting too many infields because then men will just copy that. You a…
/r/seduction10/07/20 03:21 PM
1

Plenty of people on YouTube are offering basic advice similar to what you have in your post history. I don't see why you're painting it all with such a broad brush. OP needs to take action, and yes it's going to be unique to him. But there is plenty to learn from people who have already succeeded in this.
/r/seduction10/07/20 12:25 PM
2

At the very least, OP can find someone in a similar situation, watch his videos and find a model going forward. This dude has obviously hit a plateau. Some expert insight won't hurt. If you're talking about paying for coaching, sure, it's not for everyone. But for some with major sticking points, it can be worth it.
/r/seduction09/07/20 10:14 PM
3

During the coaching I got a few numbers but no lays or dates. If your finances allow it, I'd consider trying another coach. There are a few who got into it in their 40s. Those may be the guys for you. Look into "UpperTier" on YouTube. PM the name of your coach if you have a minute. As it amounts to rejects, flakes and women responding to texts but suddenly they stop. I'd try to go for more instant dates. Obviously, this will all be easier once quarantine is over. But with instant dates, you'll b…
/r/seduction09/07/20 08:23 PM
1

I'd look into Sam from Fluid Social. I don't believe he's on the autism spectrum, but he has worked extensively with people who are in general social settings and in dating. You could reach out to him and he'd probably offer a very tailored approach.
/r/seduction02/07/20 03:26 PM
1

Also "good" or "interesting" is a far more neutral comment It should be noted that with my tone of voice, "good" implies that I think she's very attractive. To me, it's straightforward in that I'm showing some sort of romantic/sexual interest. Have you noted what places you were approaching those women? What time of day? I'm curious whether your experience confirms or contradicts my theory. The vast vast majority are in the business district of my city. Weekdays, it will be mid-morning during a …
/r/seduction27/06/20 12:43 PM
2

Define "attracted." I know a woman who is in a relationship. She's 29 and is anxious about the fact that she isn't married (grew up in a conservative culture, but has grown more relaxed). She likes her boyfriend. A lot. But she has told me on multiple occasions that she's not attracted to him. Growing up in her culture, she hadn't had as many chances to date. Now, she's admitted that this relationship is much different than she expected. Not necessarily bad, just different. She thought she'd be …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 06:56 PM
29

I've rarely ever seen this work. In fact, I know a guy who exclusively does this and never gets results despite being an extremely attractive model. Most people who do cold approach recommend actually carrying a conversation because it gives you a chance to show that you're a normal person, that you're enjoyable to be around or even just build comfort. The reason I open direct is because it's just some excuse to start a conversation. And I will also say "I wanted to meet you." Most of the time, …
/r/seduction26/06/20 06:27 PM
2

A lot of people will say tease her and call her out on it. “You can’t look at me like that and not introduce yourself.” That’s...fine. It’s really in the delivery. I personally would just go up and introduce myself.
/r/seduction26/06/20 01:38 PM
10

I almost exclusively do direct approach (there are plenty of times when I find something more interesting and take that route). When I do, I'll frequently give women an out, especially if she genuinely looks rushed: "You look like you're in a hurry/I'm totally holding you up/etc." Interestingly enough, they rarely take it and I'm usually able to lead the conversation from there. Granted my approach isn't "You're pretty!!! What's your name?" Or worse "You're cute. Give me your phone number." I gi…
/r/seduction26/06/20 03:29 AM
1

This is happening a lot more now that quarantines are winding down. If you're confident you'll see her regularly, start building rapport.
/r/seduction24/06/20 04:26 PM
2

I don't sit opposite from you at the table but next to you. This is a great one. It's more of a simple tip than, say, subliminal sexual words to throw into your conversation. how/did you tell women you eventually started dating about your difficulties or how you tackled them? I've never had a serious relationship from cold approach and am not currently looking for one. Most women I've gone out with casually from it more or less assume this is something I've done before. Maybe I'm just attracting…
/r/seduction24/06/20 03:07 PM
1

Again, I am really sorry if the comment was a bit harsh without explanation and I appreciate the question. Not harsh at all. I just noticed you have an interesting perspective on all of this and wanted to learn more. all the science/tactics behind it I go back and forth with all of this. In the end, I try not to focus on the scripts or strategies. I really ignored that in favor of getting over the fear of approaching and learning how to have a normal conversation with a woman. That said, I can't…
/r/seduction24/06/20 02:41 PM
1

You're right. You don't need to pay. And most online courses, books and groups are bullshit. But for many men, to drop a little bit on a coach for a week or weekend can be exactly what they need to start having the sex and dating life they want. It's certainly not for everyone. But for many men, it may be necessary. And for others it could be simply too good to pass up.
/r/seduction24/06/20 02:32 PM
2

I was wondering why you were getting downvoted then I saw your second to last sentence. What, in your opinion, is wrong about cold approach?
/r/seduction24/06/20 01:56 PM
1

I've heard that 1,000-set figure thrown around by the likes of Tom Torero. And if you look at Tom and his students, you can tell why. Many lack basic social skills and are just trying to hack their way into a woman's pants. Most need some supplementary social education to really flourish. I've struggled with social anxiety, and still do in many respects. So, I've worked to overcome that in addition to my approaching. It's a more holistic approach that lets me be more honest and natural when I'm …
/r/seduction23/06/20 02:38 PM
2

Start approaching and don't worry about the abundance mindset. You'll start meeting women and the abundance mindset that comes from it will be a great bonus to push you even further.
/r/seduction23/06/20 02:29 PM
2

To get started, for sure. But then again, most men won't even take that step.
/r/seduction23/06/20 02:26 PM
2

I have a small studio not conducive to parties. I'm going to assume my alternatives would be inviting friends out to bars, events I want to go to, etc. Anything obvious I'm overlooking?
/r/seduction30/03/20 12:11 PM
1

Outside of Deida, do you know of any other good resources on it?
/r/seduction15/03/20 07:04 PM
2

Glad to see this type of thinking is taking hold on this sub.
/r/seduction15/03/20 05:34 PM
1

He played Don Draper on Mad Men which sparked a late-00s resurgence in the handsome, lone-wolf alpha in primetime dramas. I wouldn't be surprised if his appeal was part of the reason we saw characters like Hank Moody pop up a couple years later. Give it another chance with sound. He's clearly a little nervous and I don't think he's as confident in what he can offer as, say, the first contestant. But if you have a chance, see any interview of his from the past few years. Other than consistently p…
/r/seduction15/03/20 01:37 PM
2

I always come back to this video of a young Jon Hamm on a dating show. He ... didn't win.
/r/seduction14/03/20 11:22 PM
5

Get a skincare routine down. Hit the gym. If needed, drop some money to have someone help you out with your hair and clothing.
/r/seduction14/03/20 04:33 PM
2

I did leave that up in the air, didn't I? First, she was always a maybe for me. Fun to flirt with, good validation. But not a must-see-again. She made it clear she wasn't going to do anything that night, but invited me out the next night with her work friends in the gay neighborhood of my city. I already had plans that weren't worth cancelling for. Ultimately, I knew logistics would make it tough to see her again. We met each other at a bar that was nowhere near either of our home. We never real…
/r/seduction23/02/20 01:13 AM
2

Interesting observation. I'm not sure I've noticed the same, but we could be in very different age groups. I was going to suggestion that younger people have less social restraints (i.e. a professional can't be throwing themselves on a guy). But that wouldn't make sense if the college girls are more restrained. In my case, it's always been more of a "type" of woman who is that ready to throw themselves at a guy. And usually, that's not the one you want to be with.
/r/seduction23/02/20 12:35 AM
10

I alluded to this in my post, but this is absolutely fundamental, OP. Two quick stories: I was at a concert a few years ago. The men's room was at the bottom of the stairs leading up to the mezzanine. I didn't see the sign at first, so I actually started walking up the stairs trying to find it. Making my way toward the stairs, I notice two attractive women also about to head up. No eye contact. Their expressions were blank. I start up the stairs, the women behind me. Two seconds later, I realize…
/r/seduction23/02/20 12:05 AM
2

Gotcha. It just reminded me of this.
/r/seduction22/02/20 11:44 PM
20

But whenever I go out in public, women very rarely look at me Women don't consistently do that, even for the most attractive men. whenever I try to strike up a conversation, I usually just get one word answers With strangers in public? There's a bit of an art to this, maybe you aren't doing it wrong. I struggle to get dates. What's your method for doing it? Good social skills =/= good game. There's certainly overlap, but it's not always the same. It's a nice to think that we're all so beautiful …
/r/seduction22/02/20 11:30 PM
1

Is your username a warped Alex Cameron reference?
/r/seduction22/02/20 11:23 PM
2

It all start with who he is as a person. He's a tech guy, but plays up more of the down home dude angle. It's not as overt as push/pull. But you watch him and realize that he's doing it, at least subconsciously. I once watched him grab a cute girl's hand and walk her to the snack room. He actually uses touch a lot. He'll go in for a bro-y high-5 with a girl, but then hold it and bring her kind of close, maintaining eye contact. He's already pretty bro-y, so he's just using his personality to his…
/r/seduction03/11/19 02:03 AM
1

Can you clarify what you're asking for?
/r/seduction03/11/19 01:19 AM
5

A lot of that charisma comes from practice and someone being jacked gives them more chances to put the work in. No doubt and I should have been clearer about that. I call this guy a "natural" but I know that no one is born hitting all the right social cues, even if they're naturally adept. And yeah, I'm sure his appearance opened up quite a few doors in that regard. But I also know that, for years, this guy has rolled in circles that have forced him to be more charismatic, more outgoing, etc. He…
/r/seduction29/10/19 07:21 PM
10

Everyone seems to be hung up on the fact that this dude is jacked. And on an app, yeah, that's going to be the difference-maker. But I know a natural who is ripped. No clue how he's doing on apps, but based seeing him interact in the real world, I can tell you it's more than just his body. He's built up his charisma in a way that he's magnetic. He knows how to flirt and do it openly. He pushes women away both as a push/pull, but also because he genuinely doesn't need them to feel good. And he's …
/r/seduction29/10/19 02:07 PM
1

You make shitty people better by being lighthearted and fun. It's a two way street. Is this your prescription for dealing with dicks, assholes, etc? Genuinely curious.
/r/seduction16/10/19 03:50 PM
2

Do you have a link? And where did you hear that was the cause?
/r/seduction01/10/19 03:35 PM
2

This has been my experience. Girls tipsy after brunch or driving by in an uber at night. Yelling the kinds of things men would be criticized for.
/r/seduction02/09/19 12:18 PM
1

Night game?
/r/seduction02/09/19 12:14 PM
1

I've seen you post this before. Do you have a visual?
/r/seduction25/08/19 11:45 PM
2

Charisma schooling is interesting to me. But I think it's less that they have an issue talking with women, and more that they have an issue talking with anyone. Daygame can be a much more holistic approach and attitude that encourages guys to be charming, even with the people they don't want to sleep with.
/r/seduction24/08/19 11:24 PM
2

I watched maybe the first video? Honestly, your telling me that isn't encouraging. Sam has a great philosophy and is one of the few coaches with a professional background in helping people socially. If Bhav's improvement is that slow, I'm not optimistic for most of these guys.
/r/seduction24/08/19 10:33 PM
2

For guys like you and me? Sure. Daygame will just be a memory of early days, before we were effectively meeting women at dinner parties or at the DMV. Openers, stacking, etc. won't mean anything. We'll just be having conversations. But those hyper socially unaware guys? That's not necessarily their goal. There are people out there who realize this and know they can sell them their formula for attracting women. I've run into two daygamers in the wild. One was going up to girls and asking which wa…
/r/seduction24/08/19 08:55 PM
6

Let's rephrase your title – daygame is for introverts. It's much more accommodating than a club or certain bars. Looking at your post I'm seeing this: feel that I am more at ease when I'm in an area I'm more used to go (favorite restaurant, etc.) than in crowded areas. This I've been able to connect with 2 males strangers with whom I spent the afternoon that approach other women, but I didn't approach any. And this but I always feel like I do not know what to do, or like I don't belong there. It…
/r/seduction24/08/19 04:50 PM
1

I'm not praising the app. I'm saying it's almost inevitable. It won't bear any relationship to daygame, pick-up or any adjacent communities. But it will feel like a more "real-world" way of meeting people. My instinct is to say, apps' entire purpose is to lead people to think that they don't need to develop any of the normal skills that we call "human". You're not wrong. Almost afraid to ask ... how would this app work? Like PokemonGo.
/r/seduction24/08/19 04:42 PM
4

Mass approaching and similarity of approaches. If every 20-year-old blond girl in San Diego hears she looks Swedish from every socially awkward dude who crosses her path, no one wins. The goal for any guys who want to get good at daygame is to develop something that doesn't resemble game at all. Be able to carry a conversation. Be bold enough to talk to anyone on the street – not just the women you'd have sex with. As for an app, I could see that. It would most likely be the more popular option,…
/r/seduction24/08/19 02:43 PM
3

I'm really curious to see what happens if daygame goes more mainstream. But what's really weird is how this article seems to vilify the notion of casual sex. I get that the writer is framing daygame as a pseudo-romantic gesture, but a lot of guys are purposefully presenting it as sexual. In fact, I'm not sure of anyone acting like they want to marry the woman.
/r/seduction24/08/19 12:14 PM
3

And there are plenty of dudes like that. And they seem to do well with women, which can be confusing as you can imagine.
/r/seduction28/07/19 11:15 PM
13

I largely agree with this. However, I do know a guy who is so non-needy to the point that he never really developed conversation skills, charm, etc. It's kind of bizarre actually and it's been hurting his appraoches.
/r/seduction28/07/19 03:28 PM
5

Go over to Union Square, Mission Dolores, etc. and do 10 more approaches.
/r/seduction26/07/19 02:24 PM
2

Ahaha, at first I thought that'd be a meme post. But damn. Morgan hits it on the head.
/r/seduction24/07/19 08:04 PM
4

I was with you up to the end. I think approaching is non-negotiable, and plays into being a man of value.
/r/seduction24/07/19 06:16 PM
3

All good advice. But my biggest issue with this sub is that most of the content regularly submitted is pretty bad. It's either guys asking really bad questions or people trying to build their brand by submitting blog posts and videos that often times don't have much helpful info. I'd love to see this sub adopt what /r/malefashionadvice has done and discourage simple questions as posts, instead offering up a daily questions thread. As for the videos and blogposts? Maybe put a minimum karma limit …
/r/seduction20/07/19 10:45 PM
1

Fair enough. I just see a guy get 1 number for every five approaches and I see some decent potential.
/r/seduction17/07/19 08:10 PM
4

not trying to sound negative or pessimistic but if I have to fall on my face hundreds just to land one kickflip or just very few that isn't worth it to me anyway I hope you succeed and all the other guys that keeps going to succeed as well ​ But seriously, if I told you a year from now, you'd have a regular rotation of a model-tier blonde, a curvy redhead and a hot Latina, would that be enough for you to keep going? Repeated action is what creates mastery. If you invest the time and effort now –…
/r/seduction17/07/19 05:59 PM
1

Let me as you this: what is a skill you're good at? Something you've learned?
/r/seduction17/07/19 05:27 PM
1

Not a bad ratio. But understand that is still beginner territory. Some say your first 300 are still beginner approaches. Do you ever go for instant dates?
/r/seduction17/07/19 05:10 PM
2

How many approaches have you done? Have you had someone review your approaches?
/r/seduction17/07/19 01:31 PM
2

I know you wrote it as an offhanded comment, but I've been in your shoes and I want to offer some practical advice for anyone skimming this thread. The roleplaying really won't help you much. If full approaches are still an in issue, there's two things you should be doing: Going up to women and offering a compliment. This will chip away at your AA. Start talking to everyone. Figure out which shops/cafes/etc are the employees encouraged to chit-chat. Start there. Look them in the eye. Be charming…
/r/seduction16/07/19 12:51 AM
6

I just think your time sitting around discussing theory would be better spent approaching. The real value of a wing is going to be pushing you to go out there and actually meet women.
/r/seduction15/07/19 03:51 PM
6

Even just meeting up to discuss theory? Please please please don't do this.
/r/seduction15/07/19 03:39 PM
2

When I went to the Castro, I was so disappointed by the fact that I only got checked out one and a half times.
/r/seduction03/07/19 08:47 PM
1

#-Closed a woman with nearly 100k followers on IG. Decided not to follow up, but I got the impression she did, in fact, appreciate it in "damn you actually did this" kind of way.
/r/seduction24/06/19 04:38 PM
1

When I was learning I would run more structured outings for myself This is me right now. It’s a fun party trick but tells you nothing about the potential partner. Great advice and approach. I don’t really like to treat daygame and nightgame as different things Love this. Still the same body language, confidence and conversational skills coming into play. Struggling a little with this. My daygame is hyper direct: You're attractive, I want to talk to you. For me, that's been a lot to at least make…
/r/seduction09/06/19 04:18 AM
1

Do you only do nightgame?
/r/seduction09/06/19 12:32 AM
1

which is where the gold is at. Would love to hear more on this point.
/r/seduction19/05/19 06:50 PM
2

The other day, I went out to approach on my lunch break. Saw a girl who I thought would be great for me (kind of an artsy look). I went to introduce myself and asked her name. Apparently, her parents put "I'm good, thanks" on her birth certificate. It stung for a minute, and there's always that split second of embarrassment. But as I walked around I was able to laugh to myself about the whole thing. I've been approaching a bit and I knew I would be approaching a lot more in the coming weeks. A b…
/r/seduction11/01/19 02:50 PM
52

Go for the kiss.
/r/seduction03/01/19 07:02 PM
2

Do you notice any patterns? This was me last night. I started a conversation with one of the most attractive girls in the bar and we hung for maybe 20-30 minutes. She started with a ton of verbal cat nip. Stuff that even aligned with lessons I’ve learned here: “I can’t believe you had the balls to talk to me.” “I was testing you when you first walked up, but you passed.” She seemed familiar, but I couldn’t tell you why. Then, as I slowly realized she wasn’t going to let me go further, I also und…
/r/seduction08/12/18 07:01 PM
2

What motivates me is that I feel I’m doing humanity a favor by actually going out and engaging real people face to face rather than on a mobile app. Definitely feel this – and not just with women. I think it's a great practice to engage more people in conversation.
/r/seduction02/12/18 08:48 PM
1

Can you explain what "low energy" means here? More chill? I get the impression you're using it in contrast to night game where someone might feel the need to be loud and "out there."
/r/seduction02/12/18 05:23 PM
5

So first, keep in mind the "Yes"/"Maybe"/"No" categories of interest. If she follows you – and isn't a bot – that's a "Yes" or a "Maybe." You follow her and she doesn't follow back? That's a "Maybe" but most likely a "No." ​ If you have a line you use on apps that works well, that should do it. Otherwise, you could strike up a conversation based on a post. Since a social platform doesn't have the pretenses of, say, Tinder, you're going to want to do a little comfort building and sow the seeds be…
/r/seduction16/11/18 09:17 PM
1

Same here. I've even had older, more forward women come out and say "I like how you tease me."
/r/seduction31/08/18 09:01 PM
2

I'd love to hear a little about how you practically went about this. I get "dying" for your goals, but how did you do it? Hard and fast? Slow and steady? And what about the guy who has a few major goals and pick up is just one of them. Intelligence > Emotion I'd love more on this, especially because they aren't mutually exclusive. I was always under the impression that intuition would probably be the most powerful too when seducing women.
/r/seduction22/06/18 01:45 AM
2

Where I live is shows that are semi-comedic (WTF with Marc Maron, You Made it Weird, ID10T [but who knows what's going to happen there]). Then, I keep an eye on the shows with people I think are funny. Mulaney and Kroll are great. Kumail, Samberg. Even actors like Jon Hamm, Paul Rudd, Ryan Reynolds. A lot of these shows try to break down the normal press junkets these guys are subject to and create a "real" conversation that's super helpful you if you study them.
/r/seduction18/06/18 11:11 PM
5

Sounds like you probably already have a pretty good base for humor, or at least the background to develop it. I agree about being around newness, but I think we have different rationale for it (I'm getting to it). I think what you're saying about irreverence is interesting, but probably not the one thing I would point to. It certainly helps in orienting you in the direction of what's funny. And a deviation from the norm/the expected is really what every joke it, right? I've read that smart peopl…
/r/seduction18/06/18 10:58 PM
13

Unfunny guys need to know this, too. I'll be bold enough to throw myself into the funny guy camp, and your post is something I've really learned in the past couple of years. As my conversation, presentation and humor skills have all improved, I've learned that nothing I say needs to be read in 15-foot neon lights. Opinions are take-em-or-leave-em. Anything witty gets tossed out like pocket change. And jokes are broadcast at a frequency for only those tuned in. A trick I love (especially when wit…
/r/seduction18/06/18 06:49 PM
4

Yep. You'll have to be a little more forward eventually, but in my experience, this is how it happens.
/r/seduction28/03/18 01:21 AM
3

The first few lessons are easy, I can ask where they are from, what made them come here and so on. Or don't do that. Small talk is meant to be a starting point to dig deeper. Where are you from becomes a story about a vacation you had to that area and you got sick and you yacked all over your friends car and that's why you hate long car trips and that's why you don't own a car and that's why you got really into riding bikes and that's why in addition to this class you're also a century cyclist a…
/r/seduction17/01/18 08:21 PM
3

What's the concern for 25+?
/r/seduction11/01/18 01:42 PM
1

Most of TRP espouses a STEM-only career path. A select few say that sales will do just fine. You obviously went into the arts. Any career advice for the dreamers out there?
/r/askTRP15/11/17 01:32 AM
15

The Mark Manson Method.
/r/seduction25/08/17 01:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter