TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SunnyFoxes Archive

View 1 posts and 442 comments by SunnyFoxes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

What you are wrong about is that those "mutual agreements" are in fact pressured and coerced by the fact that the mediators or lawyers will advise their clients that the outcomes in court will be worse and not fair. so they are pressured into accepting unfair settlements. these "mutual agreements" are NOT 50/50 custody with finacial support for just the children at 50/50 too. I want you to notice that you said "mutual agreement" and not "fair", nor "fair mutual agreement". You are trying to impl…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:58 AM
0

I think that such a pathetic man could not be productive. Sending him to a labour camp would not be a mercy for him... I can't believe how cruel you are. It is much kinder to put him out of his misery. On a side note the USSR proved that gulags did not work.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 08:34 PM
1

I can't help but feel there is a degree of accepting hopelessness in that Sun Tzu quote. It's akin to saying basically, 'it is what it is' in a roundabout way. No - It is accepting what can not be changed, not accepting hoplessness. If it can be changed by you, then you should change it, if it is worth your energy. You can look after the glass and should because it is what you want/need, but simultaniously accept that it is brittle and will break if dropped or... hit etc. Plan for both succuss a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:42 PM
4

Absolutely correct. It is circular, A paradox like that paradox where the harder you try to make friends, the less friends you will make.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:10 PM
4

There is a sun tzu quote about always appreciating the beautiful vase is already smashed. If you constantly know you own nothing and permanence is a lie, then you can say, "oh she's talking to that guy over there. I'll go talk to this girl over here." It is a budahist expression... "This glass is already broken." Not Sun Tzu. Sun Tzu is the art of war. Are you just trolling me?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:04 PM
1

Is you tag ironic or something because what you said is very red pill.... and It confuses me coming from a "blue pill man". Is the new blue pill now old school red pill? Or is your comment sarcastic immatation?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:01 PM
-2

It is very sad is it not? I think it is true. And those pathetic men should be put down for mercy and the comfort of women doing public facing jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:56 PM
2

And in all of history no one has ever lied, used deception, plausable denialability. So you statement is absolute truth. Also no has ever unconsciously reacted to someone attractive in an ambigious manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:53 PM
2

I with you... I get that it may seem that way when we discuss something abstract like a persons' value as percieved by other people. But it does exist but not a abolute scientific score. It is the perception of the people inteacting with them that provides feedback on what the approcimate score is. If a lot of women like a guy, then he has a high 'score' with them. That is how they percieve him. We can see how they interact and from that derive how well thought after that person is. It is not ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:49 PM
10

Because lying, plausable deniablity and deception don't exist or something. The very people that do this shit are all angels and would never, lie or decieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:41 PM
–

Self control - I like it... is that not very often promoted for men in the main stream and HAS been promoted since biblical times.... over 4000 years... We do not need the idea of toxic masculinity for the promotion of self control. Nor do we need to try "rebrand" it with the idea of so called "positive" masculinity under the auspices of man hating feminists. I can also say the same thing about many of the so called "traits" of positive masculinity like discipline etc. you mentioned above. It IS…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 02:41 PM
–

Relax - I don't surround my self with those... but I did notice that YOU went toxic immediately with false assumpions, name calling. Where is your so called "positive masculinity"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 02:19 PM
–

The devil is always in the details. What exactly is this "positive masculinity"? Why is it not promoted by MEN? Do you have any proof that it is effective at achieving the goals of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:57 PM
–

By all means, go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 09:35 PM
–

That is the least scientific "study" I have ever read... ...data from a total of 212 participants were retained in the current analysis (Table 2). The majority of participants identified as female (74%), heterosexual (82%), white (74%), and between the ages of 18–23. In exchange for participation, participants received 0.5 course credits through the academic research participation program SONA. 212 participants of which 26% were male,,, With the data from 55 guys you have concluded, "it’s actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 09:18 PM
4

No... It was the banks that created the housing crisis, government and municpalities were just the puppets, often paid/bribed puppets. There was a time, about 100 - 150 years ago when you could build a large house yourself on land you bought without a loan from the bank... but the banks made no profit from that... So they changed it by influencing/bribing just a few people in powerful positions. Edit: Now the banks must maintain their strangle hold on property / real estate because morgages and …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 11:27 AM
13

If you wash out.... you lose a few months of your life.... if you don't wash out.... you lose a few years of your life... maybe even your life! DON'T FIGHT ANOTHER MAN'S WAR... YOU WILL NEVER GET ENOUGH COMPENSATION.
/r/askTRP31/03/21 04:58 PM
0

The FBI School Shooter Guide - "Does the student have a trusting relationship with at least one responsible adult?" I wonder if you really understand this part of the Threat assessment - 11 Key Questions (U.S. Secret Service, 2002) and how it relates to single motherhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/19 02:04 PM
0

This same question was asked on r/feminism. Someone wants to compare the responses. My predictions... women say nothing... or classiness is a patriarchal construct that should be rejected... because it is too much effort to be classy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 10:14 AM
5

Forget your personal revenge fantasy... It is not healthy and will only lead to you being even more disappointed. Focus on something that adds value to your life. Be GYOW.
/r/MGTOW14/01/18 06:06 PM
2

LOL! Hopefully, a great deal. If he so chooses.
/r/askTRP01/05/17 09:53 AM
3

We would become mushrooms, of course, and sit in the dark and eat shit. Not what I want for the future of humans.
/r/askTRP01/05/17 09:40 AM
4

Yeah. Men do absolutely nothing in the home. They don't repair anything. They don't maintain anything. They don't mow the lawn. They don't ever give the mom a break from the kids. They don't do any finacial planning. They never pay any bills. We get it, men don't ever do anything. Funny that a study (not done by feminists) show that men work more hours than women. When you add they work hours and home maintenance hours together. I think you should find other men to hang out with...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 10:27 PM
2

She knows she will get all that money and more back when she divorces you in five years after she is naturalized. Even a pre-nip won't save you because judges just throw them out because prenups are "unfair" to women. Unless you are a student (and not earning money in the mean time), and she is paying for your studies.... It is just not worth it. Especially considering the law concerning domestic violence... The daluth model. She can falsely accuse you of domestic abuse and you go to jail and an…
/r/askTRP28/11/16 06:50 AM
8

LOL. Swedish feminists are way ahead of you.
/r/MGTOW23/09/16 06:35 PM
10

Wow. Miserable together or happily alone. I choose happy and alone. This is a no brainer. MGTOW because who wants to make a woman miserable. Really, I am single (and not looking for a LTR) to help a woman not be miserable in a relationshit. Really, it's all for women.
/r/MGTOW23/09/16 12:48 PM
3

I am looking forward to becoming a degenerate... You go ahead and enjoy the 'real' thing. I put real in quotes because the majority of women are fake af. Iether way, sexbot or 'basic bitch', fake is still fake. In the meantime, I will keep it 'real'! I am already saving for a sexbot on the side.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/16 12:22 PM
1

It is exactly the same a breaking up with a woman. Hard next or soft next.
/r/askTRP23/09/16 11:42 AM
14

You made the post.... not I.
/r/MGTOW22/09/16 10:14 AM
5

I did not say that OP opinion was illegal or not allowed. I mearly asked why we should care. Here's a hint, we don't care what some stupid idiot ummm... "thinks".
/r/MGTOW22/09/16 10:13 AM
11

Why should we care what you "think"?
/r/MGTOW22/09/16 10:00 AM
1

It will never happen. Men will pay... one way or another.
/r/MGTOW20/09/16 10:00 PM
3

The government exists solely to continue to expand its power and control. Babamommas rely on the government. And government relies on them to expand thier power. It is a symbiotic parasitic relationship. These stupid out of wedlock single mother's almost exclusively vote for more government, more taxes and giving government more power to give them "free" shit paid for by men's taxes. How to turn a capitalist democracy into a socialist dictatorship? Get women to vote for it by promising them "fre…
/r/MGTOW20/09/16 08:29 AM
3

Male contraceptives are coming. It is a technological advancement, not a political advancement. However, it may (or may not) get social and political resistance. If it gets social resistance... 1) like stupid boys and men refusing to use them, it will still be available to others that are not so dense. 2) a lot of negative propaganda from feminists, invested corporations and goverments, it will still be available to smart men. If it gets political resistance and is heavily regulated or banned by…
/r/MGTOW20/09/16 07:22 AM
1

Church soup kitchens were voted for by women? Soup kitchens have been around since long before women got the vote. PTA's were voted for by women? Teachers started PTA's to increase parent involvement. I could continue dissecting your claims... But obviously you are just making stuff up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 05:51 AM
1

"He is not writing in full sentences." Nor are you.
/r/askTRP19/09/16 05:25 AM
3

Are you unable to use a dictionary? These are English words and easily understandable to any 7th grader that can use a dictionary.
/r/askTRP18/09/16 09:57 PM
1

"It can be argued that..." By all means, do argue your case. I will argue that since women's sufferage, the only real change has been that we pay a lot more taxes. And that it is disproportionately more than the results that have been achieved. That and that technology (created by mostly men) has had far better results.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 09:45 PM
2

I say take away men's right to vote... Make women vote. Make women run the country. Make women die in stupid wars and catching criminals. Make women invent. And so on. And only tax women and not men. I will give up my vote, if I don't have to pay taxes. I will unregister as a voter in a second flat. Then women can run the country into the ground without men to bail them out. While men plan on rising from the ashes of the destroyed civilization. It will only speed up what is already happening, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 09:37 PM
1

It is possible. But why go through all that bother when public manipulation is so easy. If I want to have a politician in my pocket, all I need to do is play both sides... And no matter what I win. A 1 million gamble or a 2 million guarantee. Only 3 very invested people know about it. Rigging voting... Just too much to control and too many loose cannons. And people (voters) vote emotionally. All you really have to do is a little subtle emotional manipulation on clueless idiots anyway. As a consp…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 08:46 PM
2

I think you meant "Hitting on" not just hitting. Hitting ON a woman is the expression we use to say that we are attempting to seduce a women.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 09:50 AM
1

Sure. Voters don't decide anything. Are you kidding? Voters vote for the idiots that create the laws of the land. Then vote for them again.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 06:32 AM
1

Cool. Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 06:28 AM
5

I disagree on the grounds that "the world" does not do any of that. Parents do that to their own children. Or allow it as voting citizens. And the biology of women motivates them to find the best genes to procreate with. Which just is not teenage boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 11:04 AM
8

No. Our emotions motivate us. Our emotions are biological. How we handle our emotions is due to social learning, culture, opportunity, circumstances, and so forth. But the emotion stems (originate) from our biology... not our culture. Media does not teach us to be horny... testosterone and other hormones do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 10:43 AM
0

1) Are you using the feminists definition of misogyny? "He is a man, therefore a misogynist!" "He said something I don't like about women, and is therefore a misogynist!" Let's face facts here. The feminist definition of misogyny effectively makes everyone by default a misogynist, including feminists, ironically. Yes, I treat men and women differently, that by the feminist definition of misogyny means that I am a misogynist. And I criticise women (and men) for their behaviour, attitudes and beli…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 06:51 AM
7

No. There is no such thing. The reason is because it is not in societies' or women's best interests to support men and certainly not losers MGTOW that do not support society or women. You will have to pay your own way. And make do as best you can with what is available to you. The best we have is the internet where we can anonymously discuss our opinions with each other... And have women, white knight's, and trolls bother us all the time. Cheers. And welcome. PS. The other option is to go back t…
/r/MGTOW14/09/16 10:31 AM
11

Plate her... Have sex with her and with other women. No commitment. No relationship. No feelings except lust. Just fun times and sex. If its no longer fun for you, then hard next... Go hiking with her if you want to go hiking, just because you want to go hiking. If not, then don't go hiking. Welcome to reality.
/r/askTRP14/09/16 08:51 AM
1

No Problem. A pleasure to help. I love how personally you are taking this discussion. What's the problem? Did I hit a nerve? Are you worried that men may actually learn something about women here without you controling the discussion? Okay. You have totally converted me. Women are wonderful angels and can do no wrong. Men are evil. I am evil because I am a man. I will immediately go book myself into a "re-education" camp for rehabilitation because how dare I believe anything about women that a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 05:52 AM
1

How about just counting... If women cared about men, then their would be organizations to help men created by women or a woman... Can anyone name one? Just one? How about the White House Council for the education of boys and men. There is one for girls and women created by Obama, a gynocentric man... But not for boys and men. It makes you think, does it not... Not one organization has ever been created by women to help men... instead they simply say that men have no problems, then complain, "Whe…
/r/askTRP14/09/16 05:24 AM
1

Yeah. Right. And all women always behave as you say that you behave... Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 10:39 PM
12

What speaks volumes... his lack of trust in your sister... You just like to call him insecure. But I think that he probably has good reason to insist on a DNA paternity test. And I also feel that it is his right to insist on a DNA paternity test, the second that she told him that he is the father. Or rather accused him of being the father. I find it strange that the child 'suddenly' just died... And that you are now blaming the accused father when he ask a medical professional to perform the pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 03:40 PM
3

It was pointed out to me a few weeks ago. That there is a new blood test available. Non-invasive prenatal DNA paternity blood test.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 03:12 PM
1

Why would we consider such a society successful, if it is unlikely to produce strong leaders? Nor produce anything of value. It is a society waiting to die out in oblivion, that has been recorded and observed by superior societies. It existence is an anomaly and warning not an example to be followed. Would you go join that society? I would not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 07:11 AM
1

You are correct that it won't stop sociopaths from being sociopaths. But that is not the whole story, is it? I was referring to the other side of the coin... that you seem to conviently forget that exists. False accusations and false reports of rape/sexual assualt/sexual harrassment/domestic violence or abuse. When the government counts rapes, it counts ALL reported rapes. The government does not count how many of those were false accusations or false reports where no actual rape occurred then s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 06:31 AM
2

Okay. That explains the military success, but what about economic, cultural, arts, technology, and so on. Surely, these matriachal societies had some successes. Or not. But why not? Also matriachal societies can have armies, and military statergies, surely. What stops that? Unless women are just not the best leaders for a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 07:32 PM
3

Okay. But how successful is this matriachal society? They are so sucessful that they are a superpower in... economics? Growth? Technology? Top 10 in education? Do you get my point? They are irrelevant to the global sceme of reality. What has this got to do with the topic at hand? Sex bots? Have they made any?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 03:04 PM
2

The female egg. Only women have them. Why would men expand the necessary energy to kill women when they would just die out on their own? Men would not even bother to harm a woman if these things occur. There is absolutely no motivation for it. Live and let live. As long as I am not paying for it. I don't get where you are coming from or even going to with this line of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 02:52 PM
2

Nevermind. I looked her up. She believes that the solutions are political in nature... with a lot of political theory. I don't. In politics, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Politics will not change any of this... Technology is far more likely to cause change. And has a proven track record of doing exactly that. All the politics, laws for the benifit of women, and women are still unhappy and want more. Politics has not improved anything for women (if feminist are to be believ…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 02:40 PM
1

Sorry, I don't know of her. What was her conclusion? Was she for or against men getting these four things?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 01:50 PM
1

It is no double standard. Women, generally, are the perfect corporate slaves. And that is exactly what most women do... when they discribe themselves as "career" women... become corperate slaves. That you have a plan and are executing it makes you an exception, not the rule. Even amoung men. I did assume that you were just like 95% of the other corperate slaves... my bad. Women have other options available to them that men don't and use them often. Many men are corporate slaves too. I don't envy…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 12:22 PM
0

I agree with them. Artificial wombs will liberate women, pity the tech is so far away. It will liberate men even more. It will liberate women so much they won't be needed at all. Men need four things to become totally independent from women. 1) Artificial wombs. (And human egg cells that can be artificially created) 2) Great sex bots. 3)100% Effective reversable Male contraceptives. 4) Women to pay for their own shit. And not having mens taxes spent on women by the government. Male contraceptive…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 12:07 PM
5

You go girrrrl.... Have fun working yourself to death for corporations, slave.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 11:38 AM
-1

How far are sex bots from actual production? Still another decade or two before they will be good enough to actually compete with women. Women will get sex bots too... Think about that... (and cleaning, cooking bots too) VR porn and hands free masterbation aids is much closer than sex bots... And will be more disruptive than sex bots, in my opinion. Artificial wombs are pie in the sky and not even viable tech at the moment. It won't happen in our life times. Even though the research sounds promi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 11:26 AM
10

Don't hold your breath... There are a lot of stupid men.
/r/MGTOW11/09/16 06:31 PM
2

Okay.... I suspect that you are a troll. What would any LGTBXYZ want here? 1) They have their own communities. 2) MGTOW is "Men Going Their Own Way" It is about rejecting the harm women can do to men. 3) What would a gay find helpful about that? Gays have already rejected women. From a particular view point... Gays are already MGTOW simply by not been attracted to women. I am personally against this "we are inclusive for inclusive sake" type of attitude. Women, Gays, Lesbians, Trans, Bi people h…
/r/MGTOW11/09/16 02:34 PM
2

While you obviously think that we all should come to the same conclusion. I am curious what your conclusion is... I see man 'use' women and I see woman 'use' men. It happens both ways. And I think that what is good for the goose is good for the gander too. All is fair in love and war. Thus, go ahead and 'use' others. Achieve your goals. Get your needs met. And if the other person can no longer meet your needs and desires, break up and move on. It does not matter that you have a need or the desir…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 10:41 AM
3

We as society should never punish anyone, to appease the offended. We should only punish people for harming others... It will not work to punish a person to appease the offended, it has only justified it.... Now it will happen more and more. Enjoy the future of dystopia... The collapse is nearing when the offended have power for nothing more than being offended. It will become a national passtime to be offended. EDIT: And because it is now justified the punishments will become more severe.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 06:07 AM
1

Answer me two questions. 1) Do people in general make cognitive logical choices or emotional choices? And how do you support your position with facts? (You know that reality that you bragged about... can you support it with facts?) How do you explain advertising, if people make cognitive logical choices, why is advertisement emotionally based? Do you think that a billion dollar industry is based on faulty untested premises? Perhaps you should take over that billion dollar industry with a better …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/16 08:55 PM
6

Breaking a cycle that you have experienced and are aware of is easy. When it happens again, choose to do something different than before. Choose to do something that you think will achieve your goals. It does not really matter what, you can test it to see if it works and if it does not then try something else... until it works or you die trying... Create a cycle of calibration. Create a cycle of testing. "Fail early and often." And learn from your mistakes, failures and sucesses. Test each plate…
/r/askTRP07/08/16 05:52 AM
1

Ironically, we can not over come our base emotions... yet we try... And fail and try again and fail again... yet we still try... even though we have a 100% failure rate. I accept that I am an emotional animal. I accept that what I feel now may be gone in a few minutes or a few hours. I accept that I feel is real and will affect me. It will affect me if I accept my feelings and it will affect me if I deny or reject my feelings. I accept that there is no escape from my feelings. I am an emotional …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/16 05:34 AM
1

No I don't have any links on this per se. Look up Thorndike's Law of Effect on Google Scholar. The first time I thought about this I was reading up about divorce stats. Women that have divorced once are far more likely to get divorced again. 50% chance for a women's first marriage and a 75% chance her second marriage will land up in divorce... And I wondered why the divorce rate increases for second marriages. I didn't understand it... Then I looked at cheating... Women (and men) that have cheat…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 03:16 PM
3

There are even "serious" journal articles in academic journals that use the term "toxic masculinity". I kid you not. Top result on Google Scholar for the term "toxic masculinity" is Toxic masculinity as a barrier to mental health treatment in prison. from the Journal of clinical psychology. They are really serious that toxic masculinity is a real thing that absolutely can not be explained by orher factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 12:09 PM
2

I am male and a qualified nurse (military trained)... And a paramedic. Of course I am now a medical rep, because the money is better, the hours are fantastic, and the stress is less. Will never nurse again! I will be a garbage man before I nurse again. There is a reason men don't nurse, it's because you have to deal with women ALL the time. No break from it... It is exhausting and honestly they just don't pay enough for the effort. I can not even begin to describe how insane it was. Lies, Rumour…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 11:25 AM
1

Or men that can read and understand statistics and science. The higher the number of sexual partners a woman has, the higher the risk of divorce is. Try a little reading... You'll be surprised by the facts. I was. Sluts just are not marriage material. Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women Read it and weep. The fact is, the number of premarital sexual partners a woman has DOES matter. And it matters a lot. It is the most significant pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:41 AM
1

Not true. If we truely did hold the child's welfare above all then we would; 1) Write the laws with the child's rights in mind, instead every law reads of women's rights, 2) We would give custody the child to the parent that is best suited to raise the child and not automatically to the mother (Except if she is grossly unfit) 3) We would stop no fault divorce when children are involved 4) We would put checks in place to make sure that the child's welfare is properly mantained. 5) We would make s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:54 AM
1

Sure. I'm not arguing that: 1) women CAN or CAN NOT change or; ( I that they can) 2) that some women DO change. I am arguing that: 1) women are not incentivized or punished to motivate change and as a result do not change with any predictability or reliably. 2) I am arguing that mostly women do NOT change as a result. Think of it this way; if a woman has a red flag... she will, statistically, have it for life. She is not going to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 02:03 AM
2

Somebody has read The Red Queen!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 03:54 PM
1

Did not know about it. And also don't trust it yet. What is the rate of false positives and false negatives? Is it as accurate as a DNA test? 1 to over a billion in accuracy. To test the blood of the child directly. If it is not as accurate then I still want the most accurate test. If it is as accurate as the DNA paternity test, and as cheap, then that is excellent. This snippet says nothing about its real accuracy, false positives and false negatives. Only that 4 companys can do it now. Secondl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 03:42 PM
3

Did you read the article and understand it? "After he sentenced her, Memeo said he was bound by state statute to impose the life sentence, but said he is not sure why the prosecution chose to charge her under that statute." "Mandatory sentence" meaning that a man would get the same mandatory sentence too. Therefore the same punishment, not a harsher punishment than a man would get. Your example does not cut the mustard. This is one of the very few cases where a woman was treated equally to a man…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 03:10 PM
2

I agree, but with one proviso. Timing. The sperm donor must be informed at least one and a half month, (45 days) prior to the last day of for legal abortion, in writing, including all of his legal options. And must provide a legally binding decision, in writing, before the 18th week of the pregnancy. Which gives the sperm donor 4 weeks to decide. Which also gives the fetus carrier 2 weeks (15 days) to arrange the abortion, if so desired. If the sperm donor has not been informed, in writing, befo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 02:21 PM
1

No. For a pre-birth DNA paternity test. A sample of the child's DNA is required. That means sticking a needle into the mother's womb and the tiny fetus to collect the DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 01:17 PM
6

Okay. I'll bit. Yes. I think women can change their behaviour. Do I think they will? No. There is no incentive for good behaviour and no punishment for bad behaviour, thus women will not change. Thorndike's Law of Effect applies here. Women are permitted to and even encouraged to behave badly. Slut? No problem - Cuckold-save-a-hoe will totally rescue her. Baby murderer? No problem - she was depressed. Irresponsible and risky behaviour? No problem - she needs court ordered therapy. (Do men even g…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 11:19 AM
5

"You can make your own company and run it yourself. No one is stopping you. There are tons of small companies run by men only." The key here is small. Small. I am growing and will grow to beyond the arbitrary legal requirement of 20 employees. Secondly, if you want to do business with the government then, you also have to comply with extra affirmative action requirements. "We're talking 'bout movies here. Nothing to do with sexual strategy. Yet you stuck your nose in." And my comment was related…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 05:39 AM
7

I bet you think that you have got us terpers cornered with your idea, but you don't. 1) My company is still subject to the laws, because it is the law. The affirmative action laws. Your movie is not subject to such a law. Is there a law that that states you can't make such a movie? No. Can your movie be forced to change by the law? No. Your parallel simply is not comparable. 2) TRP has absolutely nothing to do with business, it is all about sexual strategy for men. If you want to discuss busines…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 01:41 AM
5

Do the unexpected, when challenged. Congratulate them for their attitude. Failing that, ignore them.
/r/askTRP03/08/16 05:47 PM
2

Don't shit where you eat is a oversimplified expression. And it translates to "don't complicate relationships of a professional nature with sex." The potential for professional embarrassment is huge in modern situations and circumstances. And can even result in legal action, like suspension or expultion at school that goes on your permanent record. Not to mention being labelled as a sex offender. But mostly it results in nasty gossip. These are possible consequences that you want to avoid at all…
/r/askTRP03/08/16 05:09 PM
1

What you say here has some truth to it, but also some poor assumptions. To some it does come naturally, but to others it does not. And if it does not then active learning is required to change bad habits. There is nothing wrong with choosing to learn faster. There is nothing wrong with actively seeking a desired outcome. We are humans and humans have brains and brains can learn new behaviours. Even if you consider it "unnatural". You are comitting a logical fallacy. The naturalist fallacy. It is…
/r/askTRP03/08/16 04:49 PM
1

Nevermind. Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 04:32 PM
1

Oh! Okay. I was busy on another thread. 1) Don't read to much into it... She can pick any topic to talk about, anything she notices... And mean absolutely nothing about it and also mean a lot by it... don't fret too much about it, because her mind can be changed easily. People tend to worry about a single interaction, a single statement too much rather than focusing on the general feel of the conversation. Which is more important. It sounds like the total interaction here was good. Keep it that …
/r/askTRP03/08/16 04:24 PM
1

Which situation?
/r/askTRP03/08/16 03:05 PM
1

Like, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn." Unfortunately, for most men, it is not a happy ending... of the belief in PURE LOVETM That is why your gleeful 'proof' that men don't love like that is only proof that men can be taught NOT to love like that. But we call it 'experience' and not the travesty that it is. The wheel keeps turning and the flat side always stays at the bottom no matter what. The more things change, the more things remain the same. Tomorrow many men will have their hearts …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 02:59 PM
6

Also... If you think something is NOT true, then say so directly, overtly, clearly, concisely, and logically. Don't waste our time with irrelevant tone policing. Edit* our not out.
/r/askTRP03/08/16 01:53 PM
2

Dude, it is not sexist if it is true. It simply is the truth. Don't like the truth? Tough. Go to Disney Land, they have lots of fantasy there for you. Objectively, what he said was true. How he said it may tactless and overt. But what he said was still true. Which statement that he made was untrue? "Men are horny dogs." "Men enjoy sex." It is true. I can't complain about it because it is said about men in discriminating tone. Men generally prefer overt/direct communication and women generally pr…
/r/askTRP03/08/16 01:44 PM
21

She still wants you as an orbitor. She just "wanted to talk"... Translation... "I want a 'safe' guy that I can use as an emotional tampon." Tag you're it. Use your time more constructively. Find a woman that wants you.
/r/askTRP03/08/16 01:12 PM
2

A case against for affirmative consent... 1) Women are too pathetic to say no. 2) Women are too feeble-minded to know what they want and when they want it. 3) Women are too stupid to think ahead and plan, especially if the circumstances change or are abnormal. 4) Women are too pathetic to be held responsible for their choices and actions or inactions. 5) Women are too weak willed to to commit to their decisions. 6) Women are too stupid to know what is good or bad for them, so must be protected f…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 12:41 PM
1

I'm a realist. PURE LOVETM does not exist. But I had to learn the hard way, because I once was a believer, just like most men (people) are when young. Fortunately, a woman cured me. And now I see what is rather than what I would wish it to be. I think that the vast majority of young men do believe in PURE LOVETM, until it gets knocked out of them by some woman. What you are trying to assert here, is that men... do NOT love purely. What you say is true. Men have that sort of idealism beaten out o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 10:02 AM
9

Wait! Wait! Wait! If you think this is a problem, then why don't you fix it? Write a screenplay with your script and agenda. Produce and direct it yourself. Hell, you can even act in it too, if you want to. But I hope you realize that it has to be entertaining to get people to want to go pay to see it. And to make a profit. People want to escape reality and feel good, when they go see a movie. If they wanted someone's agenda shoved down their throughts, then they would watch a documentary. Good …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 09:10 AM
2

Find another woman. After you have f-closed, reach out to this one again, but only once. Else wait for her to contact you. She has not shut you down definitively, but she has possibly shut you down, in a covert and 'polite' manner. She may believe (or hope) that you got the message that she is not interested. Else forget her and move on with your life. Three options, choose wisely.
/r/askTRP03/08/16 08:31 AM
1

Less incentive over all, money is just one factor that contributes. But of course things are more complex than just money. What do men want/need from a relationship? And will they still get it when the woman is sick? If the answer is no, men are more likely to leave the relationship. What do woman want/need from a relationship? And will they still get it when the man is sick? If the answer is no, women are more likely to leave the relationship. The only difference here is that men and women want…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 04:23 AM
13

Dump her with immediate effect. No second chances. In many places, the law requires that the "bigger" person AKA the man be automatically arrested and booked. The Duluth Model. Even if the other person refuses to press charges, the state can still. If a woman even attempts to hit you. You walk away and dump her immediately. Even if she has a history of violence in her life. Like her ex was 'abusive'. 50% chance that she was just as abusive as her ex, if not more so. If she had 2 prior abusive bo…
/r/askTRP02/08/16 12:41 PM
1

Women stick it out for the inheritance and insurance money. Not much of that for men. And if there was men would stick around more too. Am I a cynic or what...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 09:59 AM
1

Use charisma and charm the people around her. Otherwise ignore her... don't get into a confrontation with her... You will lose... If she is pissed and tries to confront you and make demands of you, laugh at her, make the people around you laugh at her too by pointing out the ironic/ridiculous. After you have done that... accuse her of something (anything like, being a bitch or ask if she has stopped cheating on her boyfriend yet) and demand an apology, mimic her when you do it. Only after you ha…
/r/askTRP02/08/16 06:49 AM
1

True...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 06:16 AM
1

NO! I let my feet do the talking... And walk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 06:13 AM
1

LOL!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 06:10 AM
2

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 06:09 AM
1

Your view is a bit extreme. And not supported by the data. All I am saying is that: Enough women cheat to make it a significant factor when considering a relationship with a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 06:08 AM
2

Those are good studies, but they suffer because of human factors, people lie, people forget, people rationalize, people are too embrassed to answer honestly, people self select participation, people are sometimes deluded (crazy). Also without considering the human factors. We must also consider the limitations of the studies themself. When you take into account all these human factors, you must come to the conclusion that the studies are inaccurate and state numbers much lower than is real. Just…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 06:27 AM
1

I'm laughing at you. "You callow fool." Is that what you got? Ad hominem fallacies. Why don't you try a more substantial argument. "Hanging out at r/purplepilldebate" is a reason to discredit me and my argument? Please grow up. That "men" created society, has no relevance as to whether men can change it. By the way, read a little history some time... The only thing men did was die in wars and revolutions. The leaders were the ones creating society. They wrote the laws, they organized the society…
/r/MGTOW31/07/16 09:55 PM
2

LOL. What is alpha according to you? It is an idea, a concept, an ideal to strive for. There are no (or at least very few, not enough to go around) true, natural alphas. In the biological sense, an alpha is, a man that sleeps with a lot of women. Breaking it down into its components is something we do to understand it better. The better we understand it, the better we can achieve our goals. That is to sleep with a lot of attactive women. A sexually excusive LTR would end a mans ability to be alp…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 09:37 PM
1

You go right ahead and change society... I won't hold my breath.
/r/MGTOW31/07/16 09:17 PM
2

You would be mistaken to think that TRP is unconcerned with LTR. To hold a potion that LTR are bad/undesirable is by default to be concerned with LTR's.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:33 PM
1

Please. NEVER APOLOGIZE! !!!!! It will only land you in more trouble. DENY. DENY. DENY. any wrong doing. If you can do it with a bit of charisma, then you will land up winning. If you don't believe me. That's cool you will learn the hard way. Why Don't you go do a bit of research. Have a look at what happens to guys that apologise for political reasons. They get hammered. The only time that you should apologise is in court after you have been found guilty of a crime. If you think that it is no b…
/r/askTRP31/07/16 02:55 PM
1

The statistics say that about 80% of businesses fail in the first five years. Most commonly due to a lack of cash flow. Clients not paying on time. Assets breaking and are too expensive too replace. Sometimes even due to theft. The point is that when you start a business you need to effectively plan for these common reasons for failure.
/r/askTRP31/07/16 02:22 PM
2

You are spot on. Feelz or Realz. That is it. Except I want to be the the guy that gets laid for Feelz and not the guy paying for it. (If you were a guy, which would you want to be?) The problem is women are not honest about their reasons for sleeping with a guy. Thus a guy lands up getting in relationships based on lies. So, yet again, the onis is on the guy to figure it out, dispite the lies he is getting told. I wonder why so few sane, rational and intelligent men just don't trust women?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 02:06 PM
3

Not only may a man not like it, but he may also not accept it and walk away or match her with the same lack of commitment. That is when attempts to shame the man begins... yet it is unacceptable to shame a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 01:53 PM
2

The only factor that really matters is the one - "How he makes her feel." All the other factors are present but not as important. So much so that all the other factors are not even comparable. Relationship status... not important... between 25 to 30 % of woman admit to cheating. I'm sure there are more that Don't admit to cheating. Just about every attractive guy has had sex with a willing woman "in another relationship". It's a running joke. And so with each factor we can deconstruct it. Until …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 01:31 PM
2

What is your point? That somethings are not within your/our control? So then we can assume the worst and accuse innocent people (men specifically) of crimes (rape) they did not do? Are you serious? If so, you are plain and simply crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 01:00 PM
1

I disagree with the idealist view that we treat everyone equally. I think we should treat everyone fairly. If someone does something wrong, then s/he should be given a FAIR trial. Not an equal trial. The idealistic view that everyone is equal is objectively incorrect. Some people are just better and should be rewarded according to what they achieve. In communism, they paid everyone the same. Doctors got the same pay as garbage men. But communism failed. It failed because the doctors and other pr…
/r/MGTOW31/07/16 11:41 AM
1

We have to accept our limitations. We men are unable to change society. That is not in our hands. The people with the power to change our societies are the politicians, the judges, the media CEO's, CEO's of large corporations, and so on... Just look at what they are doing and saying... They are not intrested in the problems of lowly loser normal men. Limiting the harm women and society, with its gynocentric taxes, laws, bylaws, policies, judgements, precidents, and attitudes can do to you is the…
/r/MGTOW31/07/16 10:26 AM
1

It does not matter. Except that it wastes your time. Is the best thing you can do with your time, Facebooking? No value will be added to your life if you look at random stupid posts on Facebook. And no value will come from liking or ignoring them. Social media, including Facebook may have a place in your marketing or advertising of your products. If it does then keep Facebook, just for that single purpose. But in my experience most people don't use social media correctly, even to promote themsel…
/r/askTRP30/07/16 02:49 PM
1

There is not much on it, because it is a losing game. The second you agree to an exclusive sexual relationship, and thereby lose your sexual freedom. You lose your alphahood. If you define being alpha by how many women you are having volentary consencial sex with. (I would argue that it is the essential biological definition of alpha. But that is another debate.) From that point on you have lost, 1) part of what makes you attractive and interesting to her and, 2) your freedom to have sex with a …
/r/askTRP30/07/16 01:21 PM
4

I love the point you are making here. If something/someone is harming you, it is entirely reasonable to reject it.
/r/MGTOW30/07/16 12:52 PM
7

It sounds like you know what your problems are. Now all you have to do is fix them. You know what to do. DO IT ALREADY!
/r/askTRP30/07/16 10:57 AM
2

Male monogamy is a sacrifice for an attractive, popular, rich guy. Not to mention down right stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 07:13 AM
8

I can't believe this... How is a guy still guilty even when he provides proof of his innocence? It is not innocent until proven guilty. It is not guilty until proven innocent. It is guilty if accused. Damn feminists and women. This, if true, is beyond ridiculous. It is a travesty.
/r/MGTOW27/07/16 06:06 AM
1

I must apologise for the grammar and spelling errors. I'm typing on my smart phone and it sometimes auto-corrects the weirdest things. The passage that you quoted is difficult to read and understand. I'm sorry. I can't figure out how to edit it to fix it. I will just shortly address what you have commented on. I disagree with the law. But understand why it is done so. Just because the law limits a father's rights (because it is easier) and may sometimes intrude on a mother's bodily rights. Does …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 02:26 PM
1

I think you are assuming that I agree with those definitions just because they come from an authority. You are committing a logical fallacy, an appeal to authority. There definitions are arbitrary and I therefore reject them. A child is a child from the moment it is concieved because without deliberate intervention or an accident of nature that is what it will be. Let me ask you this. If a person kills a fetus in a mother's womb, without harming the mother and without the mother's consent, has s…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 12:53 PM
2

Okay. Got it. Your evidence (this article) confuses fellings/emotions/mood with behaviour and actions. As if feelings equals behaviour. This is wrong on so many levels. They confuse feelings and actions so badly that I am suspicious that they: 1) may not have understood the original 'study'; or 2) the original 'study' that they refer to was not scientific; 3) the original study assumes that feelings = behaviour which is a faulty assumption. As humans do have the capacity to think. My statement a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 12:21 PM
1

I disagree with you on a few issues. Firstly, the child has rights too. The child has the right to know who their biological father is, so they can also know their genetic heritage, including but no limited to, family medical history and who their biological family is. Your position that one person may not want to know it is faulty because this affects more than that one selfish person and their feelings. Secondly, people heal from emotional trauma all the time. The child and non-father will get…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 11:40 AM
1

But she could give the child up for adoption... Yet she CHOSE NOT TO and DID NOT do it! Without any legal need to ask the father what he wants. Because women rarely give their child up for adoption has no bearing on what she unilaterally CHOSE to do. I really don't think you will ever get this, because you are stuck with the idea that women are by some magic simply not ever to be held responsible for their choices and actions. And only men may ever be held responsible, even if he has no legal ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 07:34 AM
2

No, hormonal affects are real... It is objectively true and scientifically proven that hormones (and other chemicals, medications and drugs) do change a person's feelings and moods. However, a person still chooses their behaviour consciously and should be held accountable for their behaviour, choices and actions irrespective of what hormones are in their blood and how it makes them feel. In other words, PMS is real, but a woman still has control over how she behaves and should NOT be allowed to …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 06:48 AM
1

Yes, because there was no DNA paternity test up until recently. But now that there is accurate DNA paternity tests, the laws have not changed to reflect it. For example, in many jurisdictions and many (most) places if a couple was married the child is assumed to be his without any proof required. They even go so far as to deny the father the right to get a paternity test and making it illegal to get a test or totally ignore the results of them. If I were a politician, I would write a law that si…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 06:37 AM
2

That would be SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE, not emotional intelligence! Social intelligence, I agree, is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 07:38 PM
3

I can totally tell you why she is mad again... PMS. ..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 02:43 PM
3

Okay... You just triggered me. Being stupid = being misogynistic? Your last statement makes no sense. Have you (or feminists) expanded the definition of misogyny yet again.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 02:22 PM
11

'Emotional Intelligence' is huge load of rubbish. There is no such thing. It is a misnomer. And a scam! Did you fall for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 01:54 PM
1

No... A lease is a contract to rent something for a short period of time and therefore not a 'commitment'. The devil is always in the details... The fine print... When any contest of the lease contract comes up in court, who do you think the gynocentric judges are going to side with? The one who is in the right? Based on judges decisions in the recent past... always the poor poor pathetic woman. Which means that the man will still get screwed over. Never enter any contract with any woman! You ma…
/r/askTRP25/07/16 01:23 PM
7

1) Avoid her as much as possible. 2) If unable to avoid her, be polite but bored and boring... find something else to do, even if it is reading on your phone, leave as soon as possible. 3) If asked a direct question about her, answer as expected of you and then change the subject to something more interesting. Don't let anyone know that her BS bothers you in any way. In the long run you have nothing to gain by making enemies with your family. If anyone asks you to do anything for her. Politely t…
/r/MGTOW25/07/16 11:47 AM
1

Sex does not lead to babies automatically. That is plain and simple an untruth, a half truth to cover the reality that women can choose whether to have and keep a baby or not after she has concieved/being impregnated. After she discovers that she may have concieved a child clump of tissue, she has several choices that she makes. Abort it? Chemically or surgically.Put it up for adoption? Legally abandon it under the safe haven laws? Ask the father what he wants? Keep it without sueing the father …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 05:28 AM
1

So you would punish both... Cool. I agree, but is society punishing both when she is getting exactly what she wants? No, both are not getting punished equally, the man is getting punished far more when he had far less choise and control over the outcome than the women does. The punishment should fit the crime! A guy that rapes a women is punished less than an unwilling father. Rape = 3 years in prison and 5 more on probation. With no fine. Unwilling father = 18 to 24 years forced servitude and 1…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 04:52 AM
2

Stop the bus! Now get off and catch the bus to Crazy Town. That's the bus you want to catch. Seriously. This is simple. Red Pill would not even exist if men's sexual relationship needs were met. If you are meeting your boyfriend's needs, he won't land up here reading about Dread Game and nexting women that don't meet their needs. If you are meeting your boyfriend's needs, then you have only to worry about getting him to meet your reasonable relationship needs. They are reasonable, right? Men are…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 07:19 PM
1

They're not feelings that pass away. The man allows the feeling to pass and no longer cultivates it. I hear you man, no matter what - it is always the man's fault. It is a fact that emotions pass away. A man is only deluding himself if he thinks he has any control over when another person's feelings pass... He has no such control.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 06:55 PM
1

True. If you do these thing you are a fuckwit. But this discussion is about who is most responsible. The guy whose only crime is to trust a women or the women who made several unilateral solo decisions without the guys consent or input.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 06:44 PM
1

Yes. The doctor is ethically and legally bound to act in the patient's best intrests. A doctor is not bound by peoples pointless bickering.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 06:39 PM
1

Okay...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 06:36 PM
2

I read that. It still does not compute. 1) It is not what women ask for... 2) It does in fact not make them happy... 3) It would be disingenuous to compliment a women on achievements that simply just are not all that...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 06:36 PM
1

Dude, I have studied anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, pathology, pharmacology including the human male and female reproductive systems and pregnancy and human reproduction. The only people that know more about human reproduction than I do are; gynocologists, urologist, fertility experts and specialist physiologists. But none of the physiological process of human reproduction has anything to do with what we are discussing. We are discussing responsibility for choices and actions. A women mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 06:23 PM
1

You are absolutely correct, emotions are a fundamental part of living. Emotions are part of every animals biological existence. Just like the need to urinate or eat, emotions are a purely biological function of life. The release of chemical transmitters, called hormones, in response to stimuli. There is no greater significance to your feelings. There is no magical meaning to it. You had a chemical response to a stimulus. That is it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 04:41 PM
2

And also how vague is the phrase, "for qualities other than sex." That is covert commuication. Let's be honest here... Women want men to be good little slaves, good utilities and providers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 08:38 PM
10

Okay, I totally accept that women are human and love differently to men. I, as a man, still want sex in my sexual relationships. How hard is that to understand. The logical conclusion to your statement above is that the man should ensure that the women gets what she needs to feel loved AND that the woman should ensure that the man gets what he needs from the relationship to feel loved. But logic be damned, that is not how things turn out in reality, because emotions mess it up. What ends up happ…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 08:31 PM
1

Please, by all means, do sell your emotions. What do you think you will get for them? A hundred bucks each? Emotions are common, easy to come by, everybody has them, they achieve little or nothing. Yes, they are worthless. You literally can't even sell them on an open market and you will have to give it away for free (and people will still not be intrested in them). What can be more worthless than that? Look at what is, not what you wish it to be. Why don't you put it to a test? From now on just…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 07:59 PM
1

You are, perhaps unknowingly, falling into the trap of idealistic totalitarianism. "People should be controlled, for their own good, of course." But the devil is in the details. We can, but should not, limit people's freedoms. The reason I say this is because there are many ways to solve for each problem. To assume that our way is the only correct way, is illogical, because it is not. A women may have a child on her own, if she so wishes, but then she alone is responsible for it. If she made ALL…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 07:05 PM
2

Telling a woman you are breaking up with her is an exercise in futility because then they will want to talk about it and bla, bla, bla. And the next thing you know ... you still are not rid of her. And she is trying to extract promises or concessions from you, or causing scenes or just generally wasting your time. Breaking up can be messy, costly and taxing. The short cut is too just block and ignore her, never contacting her again. You have made up your mind and are doing it. Actions speak loud…
/r/askTRP23/07/16 05:43 PM
4

LOL! Of course they are. But the reality of feelings is that they disappear, dissipate, and are temporary and often wrong and achieve little. In other words, bitches ain't loyal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 05:12 PM
5

That usually translates to the guy doing what arbitrary thing the wife is moaning / nagging about at the time. And is death for relationships. Relationships are about mutual cooperation to achieve mutually agreed upon goals that result in win-win situations. But that is way too complex for women (and most men) that are emotionally and intellectually retarded. So they make it about what transient feeling they are having at the time. And that is why relationships are doomed to fail from the very b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 05:06 PM
1

LOL! Try harder. No. It is not, because women are; 1) quite capable of communicating, and 2) can take effective contraceptives, getting abortions, put up children for adoption, abandon children legally, etc. 3) can tell the guy she is having sex with that she is not on a contraceptive and wants a child with him, 4) can be held responsible for the chain of poor choices she made, SHOCKING NEWS!!! SEX MEANS REPRODUCTION AND THE CREATION OF CHILDREN!! I know it must be difficult for your hamster min…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 04:19 PM
1

LOL!
/r/MGTOW23/07/16 03:26 PM
7

And he wants us to believe that he was at the top of every class, yet can't understand basic statistics. Yeah right!
/r/TheRedPill23/07/16 03:11 PM
1

This debate originated with the question of how Red Pill guys would think things should change. My suggestion is that it would be better if a formal written agreement is made to have children and that the old and now defunct way called marriage is scrapt. The basis of such an agreement has traditionally been included in the Marriage agreement. But statistics show that 48 % of children are born out of wedlock and therefore not planned and/nor wanted. In other words, the old marriage agreement is …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 02:57 PM
-1

Report her to the police for harassment?
/r/askTRP23/07/16 02:26 PM
1

I did not say that because that is not what happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 02:15 PM
1

B.S! You agree to have sex with someone when you agree to have sex with someone. And you agree to have a child with someone when you agree to have a child with someone. How hard is it to understand that agreeing to have sex is not automatically an agreement to have a child? This is a covert contract. Manipulation. Deceitful. Malicious.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 02:04 PM
1

Are you in a medical field? Have you ever studied Bioethics? It the job of doctors to help patients and their guardians with these issues to get the best outcome. I'm a paramedic, so I help people with these issues almost every day. So do nurses and other medical professionals. Every situation is unique, however there are guiding principles that should be followed. And to not follow them is a medico-legal risk. It is way too complex to try hash out in a debate forum on my phone. Simply because i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 11:48 AM
2

Did he agree to have the child, in writing? Was a paternity test done to prove that the child is his? Or legally adopted? Is it publically acknowledged that the child is his, in the child's birth records, without any fraud? If yes to ALL the above, then the father is responsible for his share and should be legally required and if necessary, forced to do his share as would be stated in the agreement. If no to any one of the above, then he is not responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 10:36 AM
1

Medical doctors deal with consent all the time and figure it out quickly. They can even apply to a judge for a quick resolution, if a parent does not provide the required consent due to their stupidity or crazyness. The courts order will overrule a parents idiocity. And in cases of emergency, the doctor can make up their own minds, without the consent of a parent if necessary. The bigger issue is when a parent refuses to take their sick or injured child for medical treatment, but rather decides …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 10:24 AM
2

If they never wanted the child(ren) in the first place... This is the real issue. If a guy did not agree to have the child with the woman, in writing, he is not responsible for the child in any way or form. If he did agree to have the child, then he is responsible for his share of the child's care. I won't get into the debate about this because it has been flogged to death aready. Except to say that women do have total control over whether they have a child or not. Where the man's choice is extr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 09:14 AM
1

Each of those situations is out of th e ordinary and when something like that comes up. The parents try find a solution that works for BOTH the parents AND the child. If they are unable to find a mutually coopertive solution and resolve the matter like ADULTS, then mediation is to be sought. If mediation fails, one or the other parent may be legally declared unfit (if it can be PROVEN) and the other parent gets custody, extra child maintenance and guardianship. As the situation requires to ensur…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 07:36 AM
2

It is difficult because make up causes a shift in the distribution curve making women appear more attactive than they really are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 07:11 AM
2

It is possible, but it costs to much. It is easier and cheaper to dig them up. Just not worth it.
/r/MGTOW23/07/16 07:05 AM
0

What tripe!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 06:10 AM
1

Repeal the Marriage Law. There is to be no more marriage, no more divorce, no more asset division, no more false acusations, no "family court", no alimony. No wedding, no honeymoon. No lawyers making money off other people's misery. None of that. No government in peoples homes. No mixing of assets and income. No maintaining her or his lifestyle, B.S. Only relationships and break ups. If there are kids in the mix, the parents share the custody equally. 2 weeks with each parent, and there is no ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 05:52 AM
1

Crime has decreased because of a number of economic factors, not because women are so special that they are not breading with bad boys. Every bit of evidence shows us that women are breeding with bad boys. How else are you going to explain a near 50% out of Wed lock birth rate in first world countries?
/r/MGTOW22/07/16 09:45 AM
1

What a load of tripe! Not a single thing you said is factual.
/r/MGTOW22/07/16 09:40 AM
9

That is one of the fundamental things that he explains very well. Women are a liability. LOL.
/r/MGTOW22/07/16 08:27 AM
0

Do not help women in the workplace, (unless it is your job description) because it makes them look good at their job, and you worse at your job. If a woman asks you for help, just tell her that you are swamped and can't help her, unless she gets your boss to agree to a priority change. That is to say what you are doing is less important than what she is doing. Tell your boss about it, when it is relevant. Do this everytime... so your boss knows what extra work you do and how valuable you are com…
/r/MGTOW22/07/16 07:36 AM
6

I suggest that you read Rich Dad, Poor Dad for starters. It outlines the fundamental ideas about personal financial management. It is a good beginners book.
/r/MGTOW22/07/16 05:52 AM
0

Did you even read it? I'm guessing not. But tell me about the second study I gave the title of... How are you going to try dismiss it? What snarky emotional outbursts are you going to try? Can you amuse us some more?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:52 PM
0

Have even read 1 scientific study on the matter? See my above post for the study titles and read them. The scientific proof is undeniable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:43 PM
1

I am on my phone, so it is difficult to give good links now. Search for these titles. 1) Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women. There is a free pdf that you can read. 2) The harmful effects of early sexual activity and multiple sexual partners among women: a book of charts. There is also a free pdf for this one. This one is important. It is a study done from the data collected from 10000 women by the CDC. This study has been repeated …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:36 PM
1

Your "experience" makes for a really good scientific study... And I experienced the capture of a unicorn once. Seriously, I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:08 PM
1

I was not responding to you, but to the other people on the subreddit. I was just useing your post as a spring board.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:04 PM
2

LOL. I honestly don't care if you educate yourself or not. And I am certainly not going to try educate you, when Google Scholar can a) do a better job of it, and b) is easily available and more authoritative than I am on the matter, and c) waste my time (because I doubt that you will even accept that facts and scientific studies because you appear to be very emotionally invested in the idea that casual sex just does not count), and d) you can not provide any proof that "casual sex does not count…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 03:19 PM
0

You are deluding yourself. Casual sex is a self-rewarding behaviour and therefore is subject to the same behavioural rules as any other self-rewarding behaviour. Casual sex is not some special case. Stop deluding yourself. Edward Thorndike put forward a “Law of effect” which stated that any behavior that is followed by pleasant consequences is likely to be repeated, and any behavior followed by unpleasant consequences is likely to be stopped. Seriously, learn and understand Thorndike's Law of Ef…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 02:52 PM
4

Her past history matters! It matters because, it is likely to be repeated in the future. She did not have sex with all those guys by accident, did she? She chose it everytime. And when push comes to shove, she will miss the excitement and chose to repeat the behaviour. She has also made a habit of breaking up with her boyfriends. And is more likely to do it again. The facts supports this. Just look up statistics of 2nd marriage divorce rates. Just look up ALL the studies that compare number of p…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 02:14 PM
7

He must have chased pussy at some point to be a father.
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 11:25 AM
-1

LOL! They say the truth hurts, but you just added an extra twist of excruciating butt hurt.
/r/askTRP21/07/16 10:42 AM
1

LOL! There's no good way to salvage this. If she breaks up with you, just wish her luck in the future. If she does not, ask her if she wants a threesome with another woman.
/r/askTRP21/07/16 10:39 AM
6

Paragraphs please. This is a wall of text.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 10:28 AM
6

Play tennis without talking? How will the score be kept? I'm 40, love. Why am I in prison again.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/16 02:15 PM
1

I would add to this and say... If you believe that your gf could or may cheat on you while she is away, you have already lost the battle. And it is long past time that you escape and evade. Your doubt about it will kill the relationship anyway! Opt out on your terms, ASAP. I'm not a huge believer in trying to find evidence and knowing the "truth". Because you will never find it. At best you will get trickle truth, at worst you will get a foreign STI. And if you ask any funny questions, you will …
/r/askTRP19/07/16 12:23 PM
1

LOL
/r/askTRP19/07/16 11:25 AM
2

Simply put. NO. She has not got enough credit in the bank of truth. Women (and men) lie about this all the time. The truth will hurt them, so they lie. She has a lot to lose by telling you that she has other sex partners, so she will almost never admit to it. The chance is far greater that she lies than tells the truth about other sex partners. You were stupid to ask her this question. 1) How is it provable? She gets to answer with no need to prove it and no reasonable way for you to prove or di…
/r/MGTOW19/07/16 11:24 AM
2

See my post above.
/r/askTRP19/07/16 10:20 AM
3

I think he means dread. As in dread game. I think he is asking how to cause his SO to dread, to become fearful that he is going to leave her. OP needs to look up the old post about Dread Game. When OP searches for it.... It may help to spell it correctly.
/r/askTRP19/07/16 10:19 AM
3

Keep calm and GYOW...Man.
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 06:27 PM
1

I'm a bit confused here... would she tell you that you can snort coke from a hookers butt or will she tell you that you can't? I would simply tell her that I most definitely CAN, but I probably MAY NOT. And ask if she would like to do it too. It will be fun-fun-fun . COME ONNN. LETS DO IT!
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 03:09 PM
1

Why? Do you give men the same benefit of the doubt? Or is it just for women? I give everyone one chance, just one, never more. If someone uses it up... they don't get another.
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 01:59 PM
2

A gentleman is a gynocentric creature. Nothing more than women servant. A woman wants to sit, give her your chair. And so on. It has nothing to do with honour. It has nothing to do with anything other than to make you a slave to women. Fuck that shit. If a woman wants honour from me , she better be honourable herself. And have proven it with a life of honourable behaviour.
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 01:21 PM
35

1) There is no reason to believe that she is pregnant... get a pregancy test done. Women have late periods all the time. Buy one and make her pee on it in front of you. Look up "fake pregnancy test" to see why you must buy it yourself and make sure she pees on it herself. 2) There is no reason to believe that the child is yours... get a paternity test done as soon as the child is born. If she keeps the child. She was not with you before and after, so you have no idea who she has slept with and w…
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 09:17 AM
3

There is no "movement". It is just a bunch of guys shareing their opinions on why, how they are going their own way. There is no membership roll. There is no rules. There is no fees. There is nothing but the sharing of ideas. In MGTOW it is assumed that you can think for yourself and judge each idea on its own merits.
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 07:30 AM
1

If that is the case, just keep improving yourself and don't fall for the passive aggressive attempts to get you to fall back in line, as their beta bitch. Make new freinds. Do what is best for you. Do yourself a favour and read up about relational agression, passive aggressive behaviour, manipulation and the 48 laws of power. So you can avoid falling into their frame. If these guys are in your classes or work, you must keep playing the social game, without loseing your cool. Just do it from your…
/r/askTRP15/07/16 11:05 AM
2

If you can move to another city and make new friends. Start over. This happens more than people realize. Your so called friends don't want you to change the social order, they want to keep you below them in the pecking order. They want you to stay a beta boy that they can control. But you are becoming unpredictable and that will upset the Apple cart. They will start trying to shame you with things like "You are acting weird!" It will esculate after that till they start trying to give you orders …
/r/askTRP15/07/16 07:11 AM
1

I honestly don't get why it upsets you so much. 1) Women will get sex bots too. (The market will be exploited, like it always is.) Huge, well hung, tireless, attentive, that will listen to all her crap and respond according to its programming. 2) So stupid men will make stupid demands of women, and women will laugh at those men and their demands, just like they always have. The only thing that will change is men will now spend their money on sex bots and not give it to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 05:15 AM
3

Read up what Dread Game is. It is all changing yourself to be more attactive to women in general and making sure that the woman you are with knows that you are attractive to other women thus causing her to "dread" the possibility that another woman would want you and finally letting the "other woman" steal you away should the woman you are with not respond appropriately.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 07:23 PM
2

I understand what what you are saying. Men must just give everything to random women and are never allowed to have any expectation of any return, because a man wanting anything from a woman is just wow. Just wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 06:56 PM
3

Emotional distress. What a load of B.S. You have emotionally distressed me, therefore you are now guilty and must go to prison. Wait where you are and the police will come to arrest you to take you to prison without a trial.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 06:48 PM
3

B.S.... A gun to the head is clear malicious intent and purposeful intent and intimidation and force. It is not manipulation, it is clear intimidation and force. Nowhere did I say that only manipulation is wrong and that everything else is suddenly acceptable. We were not discussing the use of force and intimidation but of decieption in the context of manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 06:40 PM
3

Read u/A_rex post above. If you interact with people, either you will be manipulated or be the manipulator. Concously or subconsciously, it does not matter, the result is the same. People affect each other. If a woman puts on make up and I find her sexy with it, where I would not have without the make up, has she manipulated me? Or are women exempt? It all depends on how you define and think about what manipulation. In my opinion, I agree with the experts. There needs to be 3 factors to manipula…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 05:54 PM
0

Too true. Act or be acted upon. Use your agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 04:46 PM
1

Define relationship! You do have a relationship with the media. It may mot be a sexual one, but it is a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 04:43 PM
0

Which is more important to you, moaning about 100 000 guys getting laid and trying to improve themselves or all the harm that the politicians cause? 4000 years of politics and we are still just as fucked as we always were. 5 years of TRP and hundred thousand guys are getting happier and achieving their personal goals. Give TRP another 3995 years and every man will be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 11:23 AM
8

I'm red pill too. So I may not answer for bloopers. However the answer really depends on how you define 'manipulation '. The bloopers have weird definitions for it, where just about any normal interaction would be considered manipulation. Yet oddly enough, the blooper are here fighting against it and not where it is used most, by advertisers, lawyers, politicians, and so on. They are worried about 100000 guys (the number of subscribers to TRP) getting laid and having great sex lives instead. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 09:07 AM
2

I agree with your assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 04:06 PM
1

My Oh My... You are the personification of the "willfully ignorant". Only an obtuse idiot will try say that "... and it is not pretending you're in a military operation." Nobody suggested to "pretend that you are in a military operation." How far do you have to try reach in order to make stupid, snide, irrelevant covert insults?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 04:04 PM
1

"Monday morning QB'ing" Nice re-framing... However, "debriefing" (a military term), or "post action analysis", or "lessons learnt", "Evaluation and Calibration"; and so many other terms are used in every successful human endevour. It is used because it works, it works because it helps future improvement. Or are you trying to suggest that only bouncing around haphazardly is the correct way to do things? Good luck with that... you are going to need all the luck you can get, if that is your attitud…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:43 AM
2

97% of teacher are women If you mean in the US, 76% actually. Is that true for elementary school? Grades 0 -5? Where the initial social skills are taught? Also look carefully at the stats of what the male teachers are actually doing... they are qualified teachers that administrate and don't teach, they teach at private schools, etc. Or teach physical education. They already do teach social skills at school, the bad ones.... "don't hit girls" Excuse me? Do you think that "don't hit girls" is corr…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 09:20 PM
2

LOL! What did I misrepresent? Anita's quote? The feminist Attitude? That is literally what the feminists say, and I even quoted a source. So for us misogynistic idiots, please do explain what I misrepresented to create this so called straw man fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 07:11 PM
2

Time drain?
/r/askTRP31/03/16 02:38 PM
7

God NO... Just NOOOOO.... They can't even teach maths correctly (and there is only one correct answer to a maths problem)... what makes you think that they will be able to teach social skills? 97% of teacher are women... what will they teach boys about social skills? They will teach hardcore bluepill lies... that only benefit women. Most of these female teachers have been indoctrinated by feminists, feminism and believe male = bad and female =good. What positive social skills will these teachers…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 08:40 AM
1

I disagree, on your first point. There are no tenants in TRP. It is true that we are just guys trading ideas, however, we trade in some ideas extremely often. These common ideas are tenants. They are tenants by popularity, not tenants by law or proclamation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 10:37 AM
5

I disagree with you, and I am very pro free speech. The mods are saying that they want to reduce the revenge fantasy part... because it is an unproductive discussion that goes nowhere. We can still discuss, sexbots, VR Porn, Artificial Wombs, as a possible future development... But this "women are really going to have it bad when...." type of revenge fantasy... has being done to death here and is not even on the horizon. When sexbots come out, in maybe 100 years time, women will get sex bots too…
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 06:18 AM
4

No. Never get married! It is not just about the woman, soon to be wife, the laws are messed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 05:21 AM
1

I don't see the Alpha/Beta thing as a dichotomy, 2 total opposites. I see and think of it as a scale.... progressively becoming more alpha. Omega is at the one end and has no option wrt sexual relationships, with beta being in the middle, with a few options, and a better beta with more options, and an alpha with the most options (he will only be limited by his available time), and a super-alpha with the pick of the lot and an ultra-alpha with the best options available. So, in this way, becoming…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:19 PM
2

Nice is the vaguest word ever... I specifically tell people not to use it... use better adjectives instead. The word nice is so vague, it is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 01:02 PM
2

LOL. There you do it again. A man with a boner is an eager learner. So funny... My question is... If this were true (and I believe it is) why are so many women having difficulty having orgasms during sex? Just teach the guy, he will learn fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 01:00 PM
1

Along with agreeing to what u/prodigy2throw says... It is also the fastest way to land up in prison. Don't worry you'll get laid plenty in prison. I'm just not into that sort of thing, but good for you if you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:29 PM
1

Yes, just like the feminist idea of "toxic" masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:24 PM
1

PUA has many problems... 1) they don't recognise female nature, and explain it well... 2) PUA is more of an hack, do this over and over again, until it works once or twice. But they rarely provide explanations as to why it works. They try to maintain their money stream, by not revealing the underlying premises, principles, etc. 3) PUA is filled with scammers... Guys just making a buck off of a market... betas/incels desperation. 4) Most of their core stuff comes from Red Pill knowledge... it is …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:13 PM
1

So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 11:27 AM
1

The Blue Pill is just a Shit Test... People trying to keep men beta/omega. Men so they have a easier time competing. And women because TRP dries up their resource pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 10:11 AM
1

Druggie... DrunkGirl... sort of gives it away... but I may be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 10:04 AM
2

It was mostly sarcasm. Don't sweat it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:31 AM
3

But TRP are not lobbying for laws to be made.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:28 AM
5

It is not feminism and total female worship and therefore it must be misogyny. "Everything is misogyny, everything is racist, everything is homophobic, and we have to point it all out!" - Anita Sarkeesian, a prominent feminist. When you believe that sort of shit, then of course, TRP is misogyny. Duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:25 AM
3

What about the fact if women follow your views, they'll be more likely to be left at the mercy of an abusive spouse. That's entirely speculative. It is not speculative when you are a feminist and believe that ALL men are abusive, and everything a man does is abusive and that ALL men are abusive 24/7.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:57 AM
3

Yes, why can't women earn as much as men? Why is there a pay gap? It's because of sexism, of course. It simply can't be because men are.... wait for it.... superior at working their buts off and adding value. Personally, I don't think that men being superior at being good little slaves, and making other people rich, is much of an achievement. But that's just me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:54 AM
1

Are you in a medical profession? Or just a drug fundie? Not a lot of people know about pharmacodynamics to know that about drug routes sufficiently well enough to make the connection you made.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:45 AM
1

Hey! It's fine if someone else wants to pay for it, but I don't. Give me my taxes back. I think that I should earn less, and get more of my taxes back. I think u/betterdeadthanbeta is onto a way of getting more bang for his buck. Excuse the pun.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:39 PM
1

LOL... Again that was funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:34 PM
2

LOL. That was funny. If I'm not getting off on your dick it might as well be a tampon.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:32 PM
2

Huh? Why don't sluts and studs deserve to have sex? Or deserve to be "wiped out"? Do you have some issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:19 PM
1

Sluts are bad for LTR's and Stud's are bad for LTR's. I agree wholeheartedly. I'm bad for LTR's. There is always another bed to fall into... I made my bed... now I get to sleep in it. The new is exciting, the old is boring. I have no problem with that. C'est la vie. But I don't want some poor woman to marry me up after I'm done... It seems that the sluts do want to get married after they have made themselves unmarriageable. Go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:14 PM
1

Don't freak out about it... It is very unlikely to happen that way... The chance is a tiny fraction of a single percent. So small that it is not even worth worrying about. Even if you make the mistake explained above, just carry as per normal... with the condom on. But try to figure out how to not do it in future. Okay, Stud, you get it, right?
/r/askTRP21/03/16 04:45 PM
6

How does a person, specifically a man that is socially required to approach first, decide who to date and who it invite on a date first? How should Jack decide with whom to invest his valuable time, effort and money? Or do you think that he should use a first come first served basis or something? You see, when you follow the thread backwards to the point of origin, there MUST be something that causes the man to WANT to risk possible rejection. Tell me, what do you think that point really is? And…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 04:22 PM
6

I love this arguement... And how do they know whether they are compatible and in love without first meeting and going through the process of getting to know each other? And how do they know that the person they are meeting is not full of shit and lying about everything to make themselves appear "compatible"?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:14 AM
4

She is a vampire, and is draining you of your time, effort, emotional labor and so forth. Next her, hard. Without being obvious about it. Just be busy with other stuff ALL the time. You don't want to make it into a big thing because you work together, and that can backfire on you in many ways. I'm sure that you can find stuff that is worth your time and effort, even if it is to take your dog for a walk, or take a nap. At work you have work to do... do work. Sorry can't talk now, I must go tell t…
/r/askTRP21/03/16 10:48 AM
2

I honestly don't think that RP or even the TRUTH about women and sexual relationships will ever become mainstream. The truth hurts... It kills a person's faith and beliefs... This is just too hard for people to accept... Every RP guy was once BP... Each had too realise that something was off, want to find out what it is, and then face the facts. People want to believe in fairy tales, unicorns, rainbow farts and so forth... It does not matter that the facts and the truth does not line up with tha…
/r/askTRP21/03/16 09:56 AM
2

I don't think that even 1% are actively RP.
/r/askTRP21/03/16 02:36 AM
7

Enjoy your freedom! Treasure your freedom! Protect your freedom! To another year of freedom!
/r/MGTOW21/03/16 02:24 AM
1

Literally thousands of books. Look for books that will gain you understanding of the world around you. Is "Rich Dad, Poor Dad." in the sidebar? I think it is an excellent primer (starting point) to start learning about personal finances.
/r/askTRP21/03/16 01:55 AM
3

STD's Your finger was in her juices, which may have STD's on it. You can wash your hands afterwards, and the skin on your hands is thicker than on your dick. Don't put STD's on your finger, then on your dick. Get it?
/r/askTRP20/03/16 10:22 PM
8

NEXT!
/r/askTRP20/03/16 09:19 PM
3

I would want to be the regular alpha... the guy woman want to fuck, not the guy woman want to turn into a slave.
/r/askTRP20/03/16 09:14 PM
1

Strong, decisive, effective, sexy (ripped, well dressed and groomed), self-controlled, highly sociable and socially aware, charming, an excellent motivational leader, intelligent, rich, successful, exciting, orgasmic, desireable. In short, every woman's fantasy guy. Chad Thundercock. The red pill is all about sexual strategy, and Chad has the most success with the most beautiful women... Be Chad...
/r/askTRP20/03/16 09:12 PM
1

Okay. The Big Picture. You are a human being. With all that it entails. You are also a male. With all that it entails too. You are a social creature, with needs, that you want met. Some of those needs include at least one (but possibly more) woman's voluntary involvement. What is the best way to get that woman's voluntary involvement? Do you beg her? Do you bribe her? Do you inspire her involvement? Do you manipulate her? How do you do it? The red pill says that it is best achieved by inspiring …
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 08:30 PM
1

One step at a time. Stay focused on achieving something positive. I think that you need to understand that how you feel is transient, it comes and goes. Feelings therefore are less important than you think, except in so far as they affect your behaviour. Don't let feelings control you! Think back to the times you felt good and reclaim those feelings; they are yours and what you want. Don't let the negative feelings control you. Your negative feelings will pass because they are transient, they wi…
/r/askTRP20/03/16 04:33 PM
1

Dude, Figure it out! If you think you can do a better job of creating a big picture to the red pill, then do it... Most of us don't because: a) It does not pay well and our time is better spent elsewhere; b) We realize that different men need different lessons and that "one-plan-fits-all" is a useless venture; c) Men are capable of looking at things and keeping what they need and discarding the rest; to suit their particular needs at the time; d) Men are capable of creating their own plans, as t…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 02:09 PM
6

Sometimes there is no point. It is just sharing. He is young, and is glad that he has a handle on something that is too complex for most other people. Personally, I think he is doing much better than I did at that age, and that is fantastic.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/16 02:34 PM
2

Vasegel has no hormones in it. It is like a vasectomy, that blocks the sperm from getting ejaculated out, but without cutting the vas difference, which makes it reversible and allowing a guy to have children later, if he so chooses. 2 little injections will last 10 to 15 years and cost less than a vasectomy. Less than $500, that is less than $50 dollars a year. And it is almost as effect as a vasectomy. 99% effective.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:55 PM
1

If that happens then there are solutions, to fix it. If governments ban it, they will just send the customers elsewhere. I will buy a ship, get a doctor and all the equipment. Invite men to go for a booze cruize into international waters, where the procedure can be done legally and safely. (On a ship registered to a country where it is legal, or has no law against it.) And for a fee, of course. If governments ban it, and it is effective, more men will want it, because it will mean that more men …
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:46 PM
3

It will only work on a women that: 1) can and wants to be introspective; 2) thinks before she acts or says something; 3) wants something from you that is more important than the emotional kick in the teeth she will be getting; 4) If you frame it as maturity and not "female psychology"; 5) If you are far more aware, intelligent, experienced and socially capable than her; In other words, it is not likely to work well.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 01:41 PM
2

I don't wonder if a woman is a single mother, divorcee or anything like that, but when I do find out, I mentally scratch her off the LTR list. She is henceforth just for fun, plate, FWB. I find it amusing when a woman, that I'm not interested in, tries to flirt with me. But I don't think of them as bitches or anything negative. I feel that I am amused by it because I am not emotionally involved and therefore more rational and clinically analytical of her flirting techniques. I don't get hit on o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 10:51 AM
5

Every time I see an attractive woman with a bad tattoo wearing revealing clothing, I think... slut and smile to myself. I know what sluts are good for and it is not a LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 10:02 AM
1

The psych idea of rationalization has existed for far longer than TRP, but "hamstering" provides a vivid image of the hidden, internal, abstract idea and it is therefore useful to the very visual brain, usually the male brain. Therefore calling it hamstering has stuck. Most people that know what "hamstering" is; also know that it is rationalization, as described by psych. I believe that rationalization was studied in psych and later adopted by the red pill using "hamstering" to explain the proce…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 09:13 AM
1

I am aware that the OP brought it up on PPD and therefore it is fair game to discuss. I am not incel/FA, so I am not motivated at all to start a subreddit about it. (Nor could I give much insight into it) But that in no way means that I am not intellectually curious about it, as a human experience. I don't think that such a sub would actually succeed, precisely because it would be brigaded by women/feminists asking, "What about the incel women?" And I very much doubt that male incel/FA types hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 08:53 AM
1

I would always go with an all male team, if I had a choice. There are so many reasons that I'm not going to even bother listing and explaining them. If anyone in real life would ask why, I would simply say that I am better at leading men than women and admit that it is a failing of mine that is simply not worth trying to fix because there would not be enough benefit for the effort. There are plenty of men for the job.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:17 PM
1

I agree with you about the oppression olympics; no one will be helped.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:58 PM
1

You know what I noticed? We are on a subreddit, where people take a critical look at the red pill, which is about men's problems. But here we have numerous people argueing how women's problems are more important and men's problem's are not. And I am wondering why oh why, can't men talk about men's problems without women's problems being injected into the discussion and hijacking and derailing the discussion? Female incels??? The red pill is not the place for that discussion. Why can men not have…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:55 PM
2

Why don't you just ask a cop? How often does he have to intercede in a case where a woman accuses a man of some wrongdoing. Nearly every fucking day at work... that is what a cop will tell you. And he will provide his notes as proof. Why don't you go to an HR dept(s) of large companies and ask them how many men they have "warned" or officially reprimanded for being "too friendly"? Or do you really believe that it never happens or happens so rarely that it is insignificant? I know why you won't a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 09:56 PM
1

My dogs are hunters so their dating bio would read more like. Loves Barking at random things... Loves Hunting animals and bringing them to my master so he can praise me. Loves Chasing fast things, especially small animals, like cats. I love cats... for supper. Will accept walks on the beach, but prefers that my master unleash me. Will feed myself, don't sweat it... where are the cats at? Don't try mount me if I'm not in heat, you will get bitten. When in heat I may be a little testy, and may bit…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 10:01 PM
1

Hey! Don't knock walks on the beach... I love them and so do my bitches (of the canine variety).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 04:31 PM
2

And some men, not me of course, can do things that those devices just can't do. When said devices come attached to man-like robots that can do everything a man can do, I will start to worry buying these robots to hire them out for a huge profit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 04:27 PM
1

Are you being deliberately obtuse or are you just that stupid? Women conform to the social environment. One city is a different social environment to another city. Therefore they will have different things to conform to. ALL women do not do it... However, a vast majority of women are social conformists. Trying to find the few exceptions is not worth it, because they are usually well hidden.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 12:19 PM
1

Marriage and sexual markets are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 12:11 PM
1

By the way, when robots become good enough, they will replace nurses, kindergarten teachers, teachers and even doctors.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:54 AM
1

My solution: Own the robots... When robots become mass produced; I will buy some and make them work for me... Robotization/Automatization is inevitable. It is inevitable because it makes sense, Humans are expensive, Robots are cheap. Profit equals Income minus Expenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:49 AM
1

I see Suzi likes it rough...
/r/MGTOW14/03/16 02:15 PM
3

No, it is not useless. 1) by noticing and defining a commonly occurring set of behaviour, we are able to quantify it, and scientifically study it. 2) even without scientific study, it allows for awareness, and allows us to recognize and think about it. 3) it is better than the alternative; of being totally clueless. 4) it is adequate knowledge until better knowledge becomes available. Deadbedrooms is far more common than beasiality. Your parallel example is poorly chosen or a deliberate red herr…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:09 AM
2

Why would you want to tell her? That would just hasten the end of the relationship. Or are you asking, if your gf believes that about you... that it just her turn with you? Most women do believe it on some level; just see how quickly they move on after a breakup. Meaning that they are already mentally there and believe that the relationship was just temporary anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:43 AM
3

Anecdotal evidence can sometimes be valid, especially in the absence of actual scientific studies. The fact that it is anecdotal evidence does not make it automatically invalid, only that it requires more exact quantifiable scientific research. So you are correct in our challenge that he has no idea how much it happens (because the scientific studies do not exist), but he is also correct that it does, in fact, happen and he provided adequate evidence. Your assertion that he can not prove that is…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:25 AM
3

Absolutely, women should prioritize sex and sexual satisfaction, because it works to my advantage. LOL. I strongly recommend it. Does it work for them? Who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 09:18 PM
4

Okay. I will accept that, if there is an alternative word without such negative connotations to it. Is there? What is it? Using a thesaurus, I could not find it. Can you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 09:03 PM
2

In some places anti-seduction laws still are on the books, and even charged. Michigan USA, for example. Between 2002 and 2008, 30 men were charged with seduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:58 PM
1

After some more consideration; I have decided that anything that can be charged as rape... to be considered sex, if it is consented to.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 07:16 PM
1

Coitis - PIV sex is coitis. And can result in pregnancy and STD's... it definitely counts as sex. Anal sex - can result in STDs... it definitely counts as sex. Oral sex - Fellatio and cunnilingus has a small possibility of contracting a STD's... it definitely counts as sex. Outercourse - has a small possibility of contracting a STD... it definitely counts as sex. Hand jobs and fingering - a very low to non-existing possibility of getting pregnant or an STD... it does not count as sex, but as sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 07:06 PM
2

If I were an amputee or disabled, I would still pursue a relationship with women. And many successfully do. I would tell a disabled guy to not just give up, to give it his very best shot. I would tell him to learn outcome independence, it is even more important for someone that is disabled. But he needs to understand that he must up his "game" even more. Increase Social proof, Increase his friendliness, increase his playfulness, increase his positive attitude. And do as much as he physically can…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 02:02 PM
1

Exceptions do occur... I will accept that. But that is not the experience of most amputees... in fact, that is not even the experience of most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 11:36 AM
1

If you are a women, men will still try date you with a disability. If you are a man, women will reject you out of hand. Assuming the same physical disability, amputated leg, for example. Women will get a lot more dates than a man would. It would suck for everyone, male or female. But it sucks slightly less for women than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 12:39 AM
1

I know this is for Blue Pill, but I was wondering. What moral principles, the OP, believes are correct and how were these moral principles are derived? Depending on what your moral philosophy is, TRP, can be either moral or immoral. For most of the normative ethics Hedonism, Stoicism, Consequentialism and Utiliterism TRP is moral. With the possible exception of Virtue ethics. However Deontological ethics is mostly against TRP. Because it is duty, rule and obligation based ethics. And arguably ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:09 PM
1

I think you are correct. These other factors do matter, but only when they become relevant. Mostly they tend to be "disqualifying" traits that have the most impact. For example; A guy can be handsome, and all that, but when he opens his mouth and squeaks the whole time, that will disqualify him, for some women. Or a guy looks great, but stinks, immediate disqualification, for most women. Having a great voice is less of an attractor than guys with great voices would hope. Same with smelling "nice…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 09:24 PM
2

Sure I can! It is my list, after all ;) If you don't want money on it... make your own list. I dare you ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 08:56 PM
2

I seem to have hit a nerve. You make a lot of unsubstantiated claims. By all means do try prove them. You can't be this clueless. Sure, I can... If you want a pro-tip for being this clueless, it is ask questions and don't just believe things that people say without sufficient evidence. You know YT is vastly undermoderated, comments on there are essentially piles of racist, sexist name calling not debate, and there are documented planned trolling attacks , swat team bs called on Sarkeesian. I in …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 08:10 PM
2

Actually, I said, that you wasted their time, effort, money, emotional investment and labour. It is not limited to just money... nor is it about just one of the above factors. Why do you think that this is just about money? If, for example, you had canceled by text, the guy would have been free to organize another date or make other plans doing something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 07:09 PM
2

Cool
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 07:02 PM
2

Okay. Assuming good faith, I will answer you. This is odd, I don't fully understand what is meant by women not being called out? Who should be doing the calling out? This is common courtesy and manners. It should be taught by parents to their children. And when your friends do it, you should say that it is wrong. But rather it has become quite common for women (I speak from my and my friends experience) to just not pitch up, without even a text to tell a guy that she is not coming. Bad manners a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 05:49 PM
4

Of course, she is "working on the better interest of the business", her own business. However, she is not a business. She offers nothing of value. Not by a long shot. She is a "social critic".... that refuses to allow herself to be criticized. Businesses are all subject to criticism of the market. If they try to sell something that has no value, they will fail. She only sells lies and by preventing criticism she isolates herself from being exposed. If a real business did this the government woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 03:02 PM
7

I accept that trolls will troll. And I also accept that trolls will seek out easy targets. Feminist Frequency is a very easy target, and will attract a lot of trolls. However, to say that closing the comments or the practice of deleting comments is in anyway productive just because trolls may appear is stupid because trolls drive views... they increase views, not decrease them... The only reason feminists close their comments is because they do not want to have their opinions discredited in publ…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 02:06 PM
1

I have basically said what I wanted to say. I rest my case.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 01:45 PM
4

I read comments often... and I see a lot of baiting and passive-aggressiveness going on in them... they are rarely just abusive out of the blue... like is suggested here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 01:39 PM
9

95% comments 1) Bull Shit. 2) Your argument is bogus, she does not care about idiots being idiots. She only cares that her videos are not criticized. Do you actually believe what she asserts, that she is getting all the online "abuse" without any provocation on her part? Even after all her videos have been thoroughly debunked. She is a liar, and has deliberately lied on many proven occasions, yet you want to assert that her "online abuse" is random and 95%. Do you not see that she is again lying…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 01:19 PM
6

I like the way you reframe, an observation of female passive-aggressive behaviour as "whining". It really makes people believe that you want to have an honest debate. Are their any more lies you want to tell?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 12:31 PM
0

No you didn't, before your comment got deleted all it said was "Blue pillers believe that all women are good and if you say they > aren't it destroys the entire blue pill belief system" which it doesn't because blue pill doesn't have a belief system beyond mocking the idiocy of RP theory. That is a crock of feces. TBP is very definitely a belief system. It is just unstated. Denying that the BP have a common beliefs is nothing more than passive-aggressive dodging to prevent a rebuttal of blue pil…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 12:25 PM
5

Women love being passive-aggressive. End of story... Oddly, they hate it when men are passive-aggressive with them. TRP is very passive-aggressive... and women hate TRP, because it is "manipulative" AKA passive-agressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:57 AM
14

Most definitely, in fact, I have been censored, for politely and logically disagreeing with a feminist. It is much larger than just Facebook and Twitter, it is done here on Reddit too. Just about every social media allows for a moderator to delete comments, without any justification, evidence or process. Take, for example, Anita Sarkeesian's Feminist Frequency Youtube channel. Comments to all her videos are disabled. Which prevents any rebuttal of her false allegations wrt the gaming media she c…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:36 AM
7

No, because fruit flies, don't need to ask permission "AKA get consent", they just need to be able to catch them. I think feminists have missed complaining about all the raped fruit flies. Feminists really need to campaign for fruit flies Rights. THINK of all the poor raped fruit flies!!!!!! Male fruit flies are too busy chasing female fruit flies to complain. We won't mention that they can't talk either, because that would just be too absurd. Male Fruit Fly: "Dude, she was flying slowly so she …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/16 06:52 PM
1

In context, his tone or spin distracts from the meaning. And therefore is ironically, immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 07:50 PM
1

Judges are lawyers, it is a prerequisite to becoming a judge. At least where I live.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 03:21 PM
1

Umm, that may be because men don't want to nurse, so there are not a lot of male nurses for female doctor's to marry. /s BP's may try this line as a counter. In other, words the supply is just not there. The reason men don't want to become nurses is because of the stigma. A male nurse? Are you a Sister? Seriously? Also because any man that is intelligent enough to become a nurse is also intelligent enough to look at the world around him and see that: 1) hypergamy is real and; 2) female preselect…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:56 PM
2

I'm going to disagree with you. See my post below. You have not defined maturity, you have given it a spin.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:18 PM
5

Maturity is being able to and choosing to put off immediate gratification for a delayed benefit. Thus choosing to do something that has immediate gratification over something else that would benefit you more in the long run would be immature. However, choosing immediate gratification when the is no long term or delayed benefit is not immature. It's having fun. For example 1): Not taking drugs is mature, because of the long term health benefits amongst many other good reasons. Taking drugs is imm…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:10 PM
1

tl;dr - You are wrong on so many levels, because of your hyperfocus on the theoretical without consideration for the practical nuances of sexual relationship dynamics and real life limitations. When pressed, most of the justification for RP beliefs rests on a collection of anecdotal evidence from the manosphere. It's a bunch of guys comparing notes on their experiences with women and then using this information to generalize certain traits about women as a whole. There is a fundamental problem w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:23 AM
10

I think you are making the personal political. Just like neo-progressive sjw always do. So guys tell other guys to treat all women like loaded guns. Because reasons... okay... that is interpersonal. I would also recommend to women that they should treat men like loaded guns. Because reasons... okay that is interpersonal. However, what you are suggesting is systemic and organized. You (and feminists) want (and have already gotten) employers, schools, universities, courts, police, government, the …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:27 PM
1

Enough to know that much of it is rubbish. The little bit that is worthwhile is so buried amongst the rubbish that it is not worthwhile trying to get at it, least you infect yourself with psychological "beliefs". Pure old fashion common sense will pay better dividends than all the so called psych/soc academic knowledge. By the way, it was a requirement, for my degree, to study a year's worth of psych. My time and every fellow students time was wasted. Not to mention, the constant application of …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 11:43 PM
1

Like I said, I do not care who Erving Goffman et al. are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 09:42 PM
1

LOL! Tough! I don't care. Erving Goffman et al. were not what we were discussing. And you know it. What you are doing is a red herring fallacy. Or more accurately sophistry. This discussion is not about Erving Goffman, et al. Nice try though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 09:34 PM
1

What is this "INSTITUTION"? The "patriarchy" boogie man, that does not exist? And why are women so pathetic that an "INSTITUTION" can mess them up? I personally don't think women are that pathetic, I think they were using their "hysteria" to try manipulate. Just like fake crying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 08:48 PM
1

if you understood abuse, you'd know why. but someone without an ounce of empathy for anyone other than his own dick, wouldn't understand. So according to you I'm just too stupid to understand... okay, whatever. And according to you I have no empathy "for anyone other than his own dick", whatever that may mean. Nice try, but do you really think anyone is buying into your bs. I do understand, and making excuses for abuse ONLY prolongs it. It is never healthy to make excuses for abuse, no one will …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 03:16 PM
2

I hear what you are trying to say and disagree with you on the grounds that the majority of relationships are, in fact, unhealthy. With a divorce rate near 50% and marriage rates plummeting, it is clear that people do not have the skill, understanding and motivation to maintain healthy relationships. And even if they do, that is no guarantee that their partner will. I agree with you that sexbots would not be a healthy replacement for healthy relationships, but you never specified a healthy relat…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 02:10 PM
1

A reality that only exists in your head. AKA delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 05:34 AM
1

I have never even heard of this guy before. So just a random idiot's rambling. It is still not a philosophy of TRP which is what you are trying to imply. So this guy says unrestrained human behaviour is bad, and something should be done about it... He has no real answers or suggestions, he lobbied for no laws and nowhere did he say that he "wants the socialist benefits forcing the pussy to them" He says that unrestrained sexual behaviour is bad for society, and provides shaky justification for h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 04:28 AM
2

But will they care, if the experience is great? And most were "losers" anyway, nothing changed for them. Why should they not have their toys? And sexrobots don't divorce rape men. When the first sex robot is produced, I will buy 10 of them and pimp rent them out by the hour in a "brothel". As long as the experience is good and cheaper than real women... men will pay for the service with a smile on their faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 03:36 AM
1

No. His argument is based entirely on a strawman. See the comments above, it has been deconstructed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 03:27 AM
2

I would also add that they were all on PPD and not on TRP. And not supported by TRP, which is what they are trying to claim. They are trying to claim that TRP supports or advocates or believe these wacky "misogynist" ideas. It is a strawman to try prove that TRP is misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 03:21 AM
1

lol - you should write for the onion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 03:10 AM
1

Right, that's why they went back again and again... I have noticed that women stop being "hysterical" as soon as there is nothing to be gained from it. But they did not. Totally gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 03:05 AM
2

OMG, but you feminists just can't help yourselves! women were afraid to leave. they were stuck in abusive relationships. and the children in those relationships too. Yes... All men are abusive pricks... and beat their wives daily (because they deserved it) and before you bring in the depression of children, remember that we only started seeing children's mental health as a concern...quite recently. In some mystical past, nobody cared about their own children... ever. That is why today, more chil…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 03:01 AM
1

Provide proof that this is a TRP tenant. A tenant or part of TRP philosophy, not some idiot's wishful thinking. It is nothing more than a Strawman Fallacy, on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 02:18 AM
1

Wham, Bam, Thank you man! This! No. TRP does not "want all the socialist benefits forcing the pussy to them." This is a strawman fallacy. A deliberate misrepresentation of TRP in order to make it easier to argue against. Where does the TRP ask, demand, lobby for, or write laws for sexual redistribution? Even how can this be realistically achieved. It can't be. drok007 made a claim that "Then they want all the socialist benefits forcing the pussy to them." So the onus is on him to provide some pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 02:15 AM
1

No. But there are other laws for physical abuse, so you can be charged for spanking, even if a kinkster agreed to it. This new law only expands on what is considered abusive. Now having a budget and financial goals are abusive and a punishable crime, (for men only). Now applying common sense, and avoiding association by proxy, with criminals and other undesirable people, is abusive and punishable crimes, (for men only). Now, being honest, and telling someone to truth of how you feel about their …
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 05:09 PM
1

Forget "the male hierarchy", it is not as important as you think... The "male hierarchy" is only one cue in many that women look at. The question is not, "Are you a leader of men?, but rather, "Can (and do) you lead her?" Many CEO's have been cuckolded and divorce raped by women. These men are leaders, among the best of the best, yet they failed with women and marriage. Makes you think doesn't it? Being at the top is not a cure all, it's just better than being at the bottom. If it can happen to …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 01:56 PM
6

Test banks are not just useful because the test questions may be identical to past ones. Test banks are also useful, even if each test is unique. Test banks will help a student to prepare by testing themselves and gaining confidence (or rather certainty) about the subject matter. Test banks also help a student to self assess their level of preparedness for the test and their knowledge of the subject. This helps them make sure that they have in fact studied enough. Test banks also help a student …
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 02:29 AM
2

Ahhh... I see... Only a Sith / fool woman deals in absolutes. -
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 12:33 AM
1

Wrong. Only a fool deals in absolutes... Plenty of men are fools too.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 07:05 PM
2

I understand what they are getting at, but I disagree. At present the 20-80 phenomenon is an observational reality, but it is not the cause. The cause is women's sexual desire; what they are attracted to. A women does not think to herself, "Oh! Yes! He is better than 80% of men, therefore I want him." She rather feels... "Oh Yes! This guy is turning me on!" That only 20% of men are really turning women on, is the fault of society, that teaches men to be themselves, and not understand sexual attr…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 06:49 PM
2

Robert A. Heinlein - Starship Troopers - A very thought provoking book and well worth the read. The movie was not as good. Franchised democracy - You must serve society before you can vote on societal issues/laws/policy/etc. Not just be prepared to serve, like selective service, but must voluntarily serve your society in any way the society needs for two years. Citizenship, voting and statesmanship is a privilege earned by sacrifice to society. It is not a Right. This ensures that only those tha…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/16 06:39 PM
8

Seek Knowledge... Knowledge is Power! If you know something that does not make you more powerful, then it is NOT Knowledge, it is a useless or harmful factoid or a false belief. Knowledge, by its nature, MUST make you more powerful. You have found TRP, (The Red Pill), the truth of sexual strategies, and learnt it and understood it... Does it make you more powerful? Does it make you more capable wrt to navigating sexual relationships? Does it help understand the dynamics of sexual relationships? …
/r/askTRP14/02/16 01:54 AM
1

"More than I would tell my grandma or mom, but less than I would like. My grandma/mom still thinks I'm a good little boy and I don't want to break her heart." If she asks about the less than you would like bit. With the most obviously fake innocent face say, "I just want one more... - you." or "I just want one more... - Mrs. Right." If the context allows it. "This week?" or "This month?" or "This year?""I have been a good boy this entire week/month/year - naughty grin - so far. But my inner Bad …
/r/askTRP12/02/16 02:51 AM
1

I wouldn't do evidence building outside of the exception of divorce prep. It sets the idea you need proof to demote/next/punish her. Your instinct is enough which comes right back to the idea that when you say she is lying, you know it and proof/effort goes back on her. I disagree... 1) She has already shown that she is a bold-faced liar, and is likely to repeat the behaviour - it is best to collect proof of it to discredit her, if needed, in the future. This is called strategic planning. 2) Men…
/r/askTRP11/02/16 11:56 PM
2

That is so weak. Being a slut is a repeatedly chosen behaviour. Being black is not. Their is no link between the two ideas. Try this instead. Whether correlation or causation, CRIMINALS (a chosen behaviour), commit crimes, therefore association with criminals is likely to increase your chance of being a victim of a crime. Befriending criminals is a poor strategy to not becoming a victim of a crime. Your attempt to draw a parallel between racism and slutitude fails on so many levels, it makes you…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 11:16 PM
2

Have you ever heard "correlation =/= causation?" It does not matter whether it is correlation or causation. The results remain the same. Sluts are a bad investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:47 PM
4

Correct her and punish her (by "freezing her out") immediately. DO NOT waste your time arguing with her, just walk away. I'm sure you have better things to do with the next hour than listening to a lying bitch attempt to manipulate you, even if it is just to take a relaxing nap. She is very unlikely to change her stance or to admit to the lie. Even if she does, what do you really get out of it? Satisfaction? Can you eat satisfaction? Does the satisfaction give you anything you need? There is not…
/r/askTRP11/02/16 11:01 AM
1

I don't need to twist anything, you wrote it. It is there for anyone to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 11:33 PM
1

The lengths you will go to ALWAYS hold the man responsible is astounding. You will ignore ANY and ALL morality to call for "protecting" bigger perceived victim. You are proof positive of exactly what I was saying originally. 1) Men are ALWAYS thrown under the bus, using flimsy justification. "For society", "To protect women", "To protect children" Just who do they need protection from? Men, of course, because men are evil! 2) Morality does not matter, because the justification will ALWAYS totall…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 02:21 AM
1

Only single mothers, that choose to have a child, that they could not support, get welfare. Why are they victims that get welfare assistance from the government? Are you sure that those deadbeat dads chose anything? Or was it court ordered? Was it the mother's sole choice to have the child against the deadbeat dad's wishes? Her body, Her choice, right? The word you are looking for is "forced", not chose. Was it the deadbeat dad's "choice" to pay more than he can afford, or get retrenched? You ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 06:02 AM
1

Edit: Can you explain the deadbeat dad thing a little more? My BF is a divorce lawyer, and I'm curious to see what you mean by driver's licenses taken away from them, jailed, scorn etc... Read the Deadbeat Dad Laws
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 09:30 AM
1

Taxes are a tricky subject. Are women Nett consumers of governmental taxes or Nett contributors to taxes? Do women pay their own way as a gender when compared to men? How many governmental programs are their specifically for women compared to men? How much governmental spending is on women compared to men? I would shut up about taxes the instant government actually spent as much on boys and men's education as it does on girls and women's education. Just that. Why? Because men will leverage it to…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 08:09 PM
2

And violent? No. Just No. Manipulation. Yes... But I covered this already... If women are allowed to manipulate men for what they want, why can't men not manipulate women for what they want? Fair is fair. Yay for equality. in order to have others validate a narcissistic self image they are all trying to achieve with sex being the ultimate validation of said image. I get that. It is an ego boost to successfully seduce a beautiful women... I won't deny it. It feels great and is my drug of choice. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 03:54 PM
2

Fix it? Feminists don't want to fix it. SJW don't want to fix it. They have men to blame for everything. They want to make it worse. In what way does the typical SJW finger pointing, false accusations, lies, rhetoric, ever make things better? I really don't see how you think it will. The stance of TRP's tends to be society is unjust so how can I manipulate my way into being in the position that benefits from what is wrong with society. Really? I thought TRP just want to get laid. But, if that is…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 06:02 AM
2

It is funny how when a gendered dispute is debated, it is ALWAYS the men that are thrown under the bus for the benefit of "society" or more specifically for women and children that are not theirs. Once a man notices this, of course he is going to look out for himself, no one else does. Women (or rather feminists on their behalf) complain that they do not get enough. Daily..... all over the news. They lobby for laws and privileges... daily. When last was a law enacted that benefits men? When last…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 02:43 AM
1

Men and women are different! Wow! That is revolutionary! Dr. John Gray is very gynocentric. He accepts and excuses some poor female behaviours as "she is just being a women." Where the truth is that it is just childish behaviour. He also "spins" female communication methods as important, where they are not. Then he more or less asks men to communicate differently (like women)... just to please women... not because it would actually have better outcomes for men. The only results that following hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:45 PM
1

The culprit is of course extremist feminism, which these days, is most feminism. No. The culprit is gynocentrism. Feminism is just the political arm and voice of gynocentrism in the western first world cultures at present. Gynocentrism has been around for a very long time in many different forms and in every "civilised" culture. Chivalry was the gynocentric code of past. Even if feminist all renounce feminism today and closed it doors, gynocentrism will remain. Defeating feminism will not cure t…
/r/MGTOW24/01/16 12:35 AM
1

It seems that I misunderstood the situation. I thought that this/these women are your colleagues and work with you. The answer is: - take your money elsewhere. Just look at them and say "This is unacceptable behaviour, I will not shop here again." and walk out. Simple. Vote with your money and feet. I have watch businesses go under because of the poor attitudes of it employees and poor leadership from incompetent management. Also consider opening a competitor shop, with better management and bet…
/r/MGTOW23/01/16 10:12 PM
1

Always be recording! Always keep your smartphone on you and charged. Take out your smart phone and start video and audio recording her bs. While recording very calmly and politely ask her why she is doing what she is doing. For example, "Excuse me, Miss XXXXX, why are you blocking my path?" And keep recording her. DO NOT say anything else, no matter how tempting or true. Turn - at the first convenient moment - and record all the witnesses to her behaviour that are present too. (These women often…
/r/MGTOW23/01/16 09:51 PM
1

Don't bother. I don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 02:51 AM
1

To sell it to women too?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 09:03 PM
1

I did read it, carefully. That is besides the point. What are you trying to say? That their are no or very little false rape claims? What is the percent of false rape allegations that you think is correct and based on what criteria? ...and others found that police decisions to no-crime were frequently dubious and based entirely on the officer's personal judgement. "frequently dubious"... How much exactly? Is a feeling that something is dubious proof of rape now? What exactly is the police office…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 09:47 AM
1

Are you seriously trying to say that, in russian roulette, pulling the trigger once will give you a one in six chance of dieing, but that pulling the trigger twice (after spinning again) would give you a 1 in 36 chance of blowing your brains out. And each time thereafter reducing your chance of dieing. 1/6 = 16.7% and 1/36 = 2.8% Are you serious? For every time the chance remains 1 in 6, it can never decrease lower than that because there is one bullet and six possible chambers. The more times y…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:27 AM
1

according to the fbi there are 52.9 rapes per 100000 According to the FBI there are 52.9 reported rapes per 100000. Some of those are false, as in no rape occurred. Some rapes are not reported. False reports and false accusation are different. A false report does not name or identify a perpetrator / rapist. A false accusation does name or identify an accused. Between 4 and 11% are stranger rapes, that means 89 to 96% of rapes are a named person. A false accusation, in other words. Many studies h…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 01:11 AM
2

My advice, is NOT to FWB/date/ONS someone in your social circle... it very often leads to complications that you would prefer to avoid in the long run. These complications are harsh sometimes. Also, college, is becoming riskier too. Date outside of college. Use this girl to create social proofing... look it up. That is to say, deliberately friendzone her. Take her with you to cold approach other women so other women associate you with being liked by other women.
/r/seduction25/11/15 10:37 PM
1

Dude, ignore the blooper/feminist/troll.
/r/seduction25/11/15 07:50 PM
4

Be interested in the other person you are talking to. Try to find out who they really are. Most people love talking about themselves and being heard. You don't have to be interesting to be interested in other people. Of course, it is better to have interesting goals, plans, ideas, life experiences, etc. to share with people to encourage them to open up to you about their own things.
/r/askTRP25/11/15 07:45 PM
12

If you did not know, healthy men get erections that they don't want all the time, often even in embarrassing/stressful situations. Getting an erection is not consent. Just like women getting "wet" is not consent either. She was wet therefore it was not rape... Does that sound right to you? He had an erection therefore it was not rape... Apparently this sounds right to you. Has a man ever woken up from having sex while drunk and felt violated? Yes, men have and do and will. Especially when said r…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 07:31 PM
1

contempt + prejudice = misogyny What happened to hatred? Check the dictionary... misogyny is the hatred or fear of women. Not contempt and/or prejudice of women. Unless you are trying to state that contempt and prejudice is hatred. Which it is not. I have contempt for and prejudice against Apple Macintosh products therefore I hate it? Or could it just mean that I prefer something else over it? Or that something else is superior to it? Like I said earlier, feminism and feminist keep moving the go…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 09:41 AM
1

No. Misogyny is not the active ingredient. Not for TRP, and not for any sexual strategy. In fact, I will wager that the hatred of women will be counterproductive to any hetrosexual man's sexual strategy. But it would be even more counterproductive to ignore female nature. Knowledge is power. TBP believe that even examining female nature is misogyny. To be honest, I don't even know what feminists, do not consider misogyny anymore. Even being nice to a woman is misogyny now. According to feminists…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/15 09:59 PM
1

LOL - They are actually trying to do it... "Sanitized game" or sanitized red pill perhaps. But what happens when they try to discuss female nature? Girls are made of sugar and spice and all things nice, and boys are made of puppy dog tails... That's just not going to work any more. A lot of men are awakening to the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 10:11 PM
2

It also destroys your life, and any hope you may have to develop or maintain healthy relationships. Define "healthy relationships" in real terms. 50% divorce rate? Losing more than half your life's earnings? Losing your children? Losing your house? Losing your dignity? Emotional anguish? When did that become "healthy"? If all you want is a girl with big titays and you don't give a shit about who she is, what she thinks, or what she wants, then it seems trp is for you. LOL - yet another strawman.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 10:00 PM
18

Still, TRP gets dudes laid fast. Particularly dudes who were having trouble. Very few other places, movements, or whatever in this world can tell a dude "Listen to me and I will get you laid, and quickly" and actually deliver. And, them having the power to do that, and no real competitors in the BP-o-sphere, means that TRP is going to exist for a long time. Here is the solution for TBP or general society or even feminists maybe... create an effective sexual strategy for men that is better than T…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 08:22 PM
3

seems A very convincing argument. It seems that your argument is so weak that even you can't commit to it. So let me help you commit. TRP is absolutely destructive and is intended to be. It destroys the societal norms of sexual strategy (AKA marriage). It destroys the misguided, unhelpful, foolish, societal sexual and relationship advice and expectations for men. It destroys the pedestal woman are on. It destroys chivalry. It destroys gynocentrism. It destroys the expectation of male disposabili…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:19 PM
3

I dislike the concept of "compromise". Creating win-win scenarios is far superior. Mutually beneficial cooperation. Everyone wins, nobody loses. In the compromise paradigm, it is expected that someone loses, or gets taken advantage of, or works harder for less reward. I don't like this at all because it is not healthy. The "mutually beneficial cooperation" or "win-win" paradigm, works. It works on so many levels. If you can pull it off and create win-win situations, people will be more likely to…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 12:53 PM
2

Reply with "oh so you noticed? followed with, "good, at least you are not SHORT-sighted."
/r/askTRP18/11/15 07:56 PM
4

I personally like some length and am growing my hair out, chick's love stroking longer hair dick. There, fixed that for you.
/r/askTRP18/11/15 03:44 PM
5

Wow - fun fact - you sound really ticked off. Calm down to a panic. No one is planning to "bring down the system". Whatever that may mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 08:33 AM
2

Ja, I don't get where Anandya is coming from. Crazy talk. Two straight guys can't have sex with each other... No erections to work with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 08:27 AM
5

Go away troll. You are winning no points here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 05:54 AM
2

LOL - Sorry, men are busy now, doing virtual porn. Please call back next century.
/r/MGTOW16/11/15 04:20 AM
1

LOL - Nice try. Go troll somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 04:16 AM
3

Exactly the same as a pre-nup between a man and a women, because same sex marriage is legal now, pre-nups between men will be legally binding too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 04:15 AM
1

TRP is NOT PUA for that go to r/seduction or r/pua TRP is sexual strategy, which has a lot of overlap with seduction, but is not the same, due to inherently different philosophical viewpoints and approaches. TRP emphasizes understanding both male and female nature, within the context of sexual strategy. Whereas PUA is reductionist and pragmatic - it works or it does not work. PUA don't really care why. TRP tries to examine why something works or does not work. (Often laughably unsuccessfully and…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 10:58 PM
18

Funny story. I told my straight son to marry his straight best friend, so he (the friend) can gain citizenship... and have an "open relationship" with lots of women and just call themselves bi for the legalities of the matter. They don't actually have to have sex because it is not a requirement for heteros either these days. Maybe they can share a slut in an awkward threesome to "consummate" their marriage. "We did have sex together!" (with the same women, at the same time, in the same bed) It i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 09:30 PM
1

How do you know? I'm curious.
/r/MGTOW15/11/15 07:54 PM
1

I don't see a problem. If this feminists thinks that it is sexist, then she can make a better virtual goggle set herself and fix the problem. Problem solved.
/r/MGTOW15/11/15 02:31 PM
0

You are lucky... most guys have to deal with their mothers asking intrusive questions that enquire about grandchildren. (Some, even if they already have grandchildren.)
/r/MGTOW15/11/15 02:14 PM
5

Ageed. Some "MGTOW" get this weird attitude where, "If I reject women, then women will be upset." No, women are not going to get upset at all, amused maybe, but not upset in the slightest. MGTOW are not trying to fix, upset, hurt or put them in their place, MGTOW are living their lives, without disruption from women. Or at the very least minimizing the disruption from women. If trying or wanting to upset women is in your headspace, women are still disrupting your life and therefore you are not M…
/r/MGTOW15/11/15 02:02 PM
7

Women don't care if you and a couple more of your loser friends don't approach them, they still get plenty of attention, validation, gifts, favours and dick, etc. from other desperate guys. Women and feminists do not feel threatened by MGTOW at all. They have no reason to be. They may be amused by it, but their life continues just as it did before. When they turn 30 and get baby rabies and want to settle and settle down, then suddenly, they will care. "Where have all the good men gone?" Every MG…
/r/MGTOW14/11/15 03:20 AM
1

or a religious view
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 02:37 AM
2

Dude - focus and finish it, stay focused on the task at hand.... Getting the qualification ASAP. You can look for something better afterwards. Wade through all that shit with a smile on your face, because you already know that you can do better than them.
/r/askTRP13/11/15 11:40 PM
1

I think that you need to focus on the task at hand, finish your studies, even if you do not like it, get a job, and move on from there to another field, if you can/must. It looks very bad on your resume to never finish something. It looks good on your resume, to finish things then move upwards and keep improving, even changing careers, if it looks like an improvement. I know a doctor that changed his career and became a professional pilot, "because he loves flying" and hates medicine. You need t…
/r/askTRP13/11/15 10:46 PM
1

On a side note. I just realized why they went with 10'000 rather than a larger sample size (other than budget limitations). It is because the "instrument" (questioning methodology) and the "subjects" (survey respondents) are fundamentally irreparable. No amount of error correction is going the fix the problem with the studies. The problem is systemic within humans, that lie or forget or rationalize, and within the instruments, that cause anxiety in the subject (among other factors I mentioned be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 11:53 AM
1

Of course I've already done this. And you haven't. But hey, give it a try. Try inserting the total population of the USA as "Population" in this calculator. http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm Then look at the sample size requirement. Then go to the study, and look at the sample. Amazing coincidence huh? You are a real internet warrior. You found a webpage that calculates sample size for a single yes/no question poll and now you think you have it all figured out. That page sells the real soft…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 10:51 PM
1

No. You've completely misunderstood. The law of effect describes the process of operant conditioning. Behavioristic psychology is limited to the connection between a simple action and a simple response that is externally introduced. How you feel about having casual sex is a lot more complex. You can have 10 partners in a month, and then suddenly feel like a whore and throw up after partner eleven. The response to the action of casual sex isn't constant as it is in the experiments Thorndike, Skin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 02:59 PM
0

Women move the goal post a lot. They change the meaning of words all the time in order to manipulate others. Think of feminists... Patriarchy is the rule of father's; but father do not and have never ruled... So they change the meaning of the word... Patriarchy is the rule of father's men; but men do not and have never ruled. So they change the meaning of the word again... Patriarchy is the rules of for men, by men, to benefit men at the expense of women and, but men don't make rules for men. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 04:34 AM
2

I'm 27 now and I'm somewhere between 20-30 partner count wise. My personal experience is irrelevant when it comes to judging the validity of a study. I brought it up because I don't think 5 partners at 30 means you've ridden a "cock carousel". I really don't think you get this... That study on lifetime partners is wildly incorrect. It is. On so many levels. The information is useless. Tossing a coin would be better. You are not going to believe me, so speak to a statistician, they will tell you.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 02:03 AM
1

So you have nothing. No insight at all. Nil. Zero. Nothing. Why are you here again?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 12:13 AM
2

I'm 43 and have slept with the same women for since I was 25. And still do. No, I'm beginning to think you're very distanced from reality. You seem to just pull stuff out of your ass. Yet you say... Hell, I had 5 at 20, and I don't consider myself anything close to a player. And still you believe that the above study on sexual partners is accurate... Hmmm... Interesting... What was it again... 3.9 median lifetime sexual partners for women? What is your count going to be at 30 -35 at this rate, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 11:52 PM
1

I don't think any RP said that they invented it... just that it is effective. And men need to be told it, until it sinks in and they change themselves. Is that it? Look attractive and get a personality. I really don't think TBP is going to help a lot of men, if this is the sum total of BP advice. You do know that it is impossible to not have a personality, don't you? What are the good personality traits to have? What is attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:13 PM
1

And it's not socially acceptable to have a Sexual strategy. Is this true? Do BP agree with this RP commenter below?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:03 PM
1

LOL. So I assume that you are 100% blue pill. Cool. Is there actually a blue pill sexual strategy? Other than "Just be yourself!" "There is someone for everyone!" "Every pot has a lid" "Be patient." sort of stuff. I have being looking on TBP, for an actual BP strategy, but could not find anything. It seems to me that TBP exists only to disagree with TRP, but never offers any tangible, concrete, realistic strategy for men. Can you point me to a BP sexual strategy, in a nutshell, type post on TBP …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:00 PM
3

Do you even know what that last point you're citing means? It means you can't generate statistical estimates about subgroups. Which is why the study doesn't. Yes, I did understand that and assumed you would too. My mistake. Are hetrosexual women not a sub-group? Are hetrosexual men not a subgroup? Or did they suddenly become the entire group? Do you know how large a sample (of the subgroup being studied) needs to be for a >95% confidence, for just one yes/no question? 64'000+ out of a population…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:27 PM
2

True. To find anything useful, you have to sift through a lot of rubbish, even within the social sciences. I just hate saying that, "even within a science". It is just so wrong, to HAVE to say that. Which effectively means it is not science. I call it "information mining"; read, reject; read, reject; read, reject; read, can't reject, keep it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 07:37 PM
3

LSD? Really? Okay, I will hear you out. How did/does LSD change the face of sexual relationships? When less than 5% of the population use it? As opposed to contraception where over 80% use it now? Or, do you mean personally? The guy above is arguing about semantics. The definition of social classes has changed since the 1950's, hence comparing social classes of today to social classes of any period of yesteryear is almost pointless. The data is NOT comparable, unfortunately. He is idealizing the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 06:58 PM
3

Meh... convincing arguments in favour of something is a good hypothesis, not scientific evidence. The jury is still out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 05:43 PM
4

That is a great degree that you have (if you do in fact have it; this is the internet after all) I did not want you to comment on any study. Just make you aware that those things have been tested... and you can find it with google scholar. Women are hypergamous in the same way that men are hypergamous. What? No, they are not. Men don't even want the same things. Men want to fuck upwards not marry upwards. I wonder, how closely do you read the studies you post? I sent you to google scholar to fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 05:18 PM
2

I have never seen a TRP post that idealizes the 50's nor high or upper class society from any time period. Nor have I ever seen a post that recommends it. And I actually read the shit that they do write. I also read the crap that TBP writes. All I can say is TRP has slightly less feces in it and you may actually find a gem now and again in TRP. If you are going to try sift through any TRP or TBP posts, get a gas mask, you will need it. Nor is it even in the core beliefs of what TRP is all about.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 03:36 PM
3

That's where you're wrong. TRP makes testable claims (cock carousel, hypergamy, preference for alpha males) that are not supported in studies. Seriously? Hypergamy Cock carousel = promiscuity / premarital sex Also preference for alpha males = human mate selection These testable claims have already been tested and proven, by science. Try reading a little. TRP may use different terms/words than do scientist... but it is there for you to find on google scholar, if you know what you are looking for.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 03:02 PM
1

There is actually a lot of science about sex, sexual relationships, sexual strategy, social skills, psychology, etc. that is relevant and agrees with the red pill. Unfortunately, most of it is behind paywalls. And, secondly, it is not organized into anything useful. Just go to any journal article repository and type in what you are looking for. I use google scholar. My personal favourite journal article is: Women's preferences for sexual dimorphism in height depend on menstrual cycle phase and e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 01:58 PM
4

Pure conjecture on your part. No, TRP, do not "act" like that. Be AKA act manly, yes. Be / Act alpha, yes. Be / Act confident, yes. Act upper class, no. Act wealthy, no. (But been wealthy helps a lot, except if it is a BB strategy, then you are screwing yourself.) Where do you get this from? Are you so desperate to attack TRP that you have to make things up to attack? There is plenty wrong with TRP and what some TRPers write, you don't need to make up stuff to try attack it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 12:40 PM
1

Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:47 AM
1

In what way, is the fact that "feminism is not a sexual strategy" relevant to this discussion? I never said that it was. Feminism and its beliefs, however, does affect sexual strategy. Or are you trying to say that what men and women believe about each other won't affect their relationships with each other? You are really trying very hard to get a point in - no matter how irrelevant it is to the discussion. Give up already... you have lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:45 AM
1

Thank you for your advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:33 AM
1

I'm sorry that you can't afford a brand new car. Do you at least have a second hand car and can get around to where you need to go? Of course sex is not a right. OP in no way said it was or even implied that it was a right. You are strawmanning. He did imply that it was desirable... I'm out, Good Night.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 08:07 PM
1

Empathy is an endless supply... you can only run out of it, if you turn it off. That is your choice. people who are complaining about not getting enough casual sex Great way to try minimise what he is actually "complaining about", or trying to come to terms with. But obviously he is just another entitled prick and not someone that sees that what he was always told and lead to believe, is false and this is bothering him. Children are always very happy to find out Santa isn't real. This is the man…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:16 PM
2

What? Is it your hope that women will just feel so badly for these guys that we'll drop our pants? I have never met or heard of a women that actually "pity fucks" and I don't think that they will start now, after thousands of years of recorded history. But empathy is not about that and you know it. Or maybe you don't. A guy is struggling to come to terms with some fucked up stuff... A little empathy will go a long way to moving the guy to a healthier place... because where he is now is not healt…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:54 PM
1

Perhaps, but I think not. I err towards active caution AKA "safety first" "first do no harm".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:40 PM
3

Of course, you don't care. That would require empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:13 PM
3

I think that the real problem is that men (and women) are poorly educated about sex and sexual relationships. As a result, sex and sexual relationships are fraught with all sorts of misinformation, misunderstandings, miscommunications and unrealistic expectations. So much about sex is taboo and difficult to talk about. And a lot of people are really over sensitive and get offended so easily if someone says something they do not like or even just talks about sex. The feminist are also are creatin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:10 PM
1

Oh! I know! I'm just having fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 02:29 PM
1

This is true. Their long term undoing, but in the short term, they are still going to screw you over and can destroy your life/reputation/career. I would rather be on guard and ready to prevent them from screwing me over, or even better be the one that undoes them early so they don't leave a wake of hurt and damage behind them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 02:20 PM
2

You shouldn't support feminism so you can be "liked". You should support feminism because it's the right thing to do, and it is beneficial for everyone. Supporting a movement so as to be "liked" is stupid and disingenuous. People should never do things for other people to be liked. A man should never be supportive of a woman's... I agree it is stupid and disingenuous too do "nice" things for people and being supportive of their beliefs, especially hypocritical feminists. No, you should not suppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:48 AM
1

It was not a study of why the sky is blue but a study of whether the sky is really blue. But you did not get that because I was not very clear about it. It was a joke...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:05 AM
1

Okay, I hear you, but I have to ask; how many people must get hurt (or in the case of war, die) to stop the dark triad types. In my opinion, earlier is always better. Less people get hurt/die. It is best that they are prevented from attaining power at all, if possible. That means using their tactics against them. It means being strategic. Report them to HR for what? They are careful not to get their hands dirty or caught in the act. The more intelligent they are the harder it will be to find evi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:03 AM
1

Dude, there is a lot of anecdotal evidence. At what point does all that anecdotal evidence become real enough to be worthy of note? When a scientist gets a grant, to study something no one cares about because every sane person already knows the answer? Just because there are no studies on a matter does not mean that it is not true. Are there any studies of the colour of the sky? "Is the sky really blue? A systematic study of the skies colour spectrum." by Prof. Idiot One and Dr. Moron Two. Non-m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 02:40 AM
1

I did read it... but you are not getting the point. These "male feminists" have being told that they are cool, by feminists. They have been recruited by feminist, that make them believe that if they support feminism, they will be liked by feminists, that they are doing the right thing. They are and have been lied to, by feminists. They have been lead to believe that they are supporting equality for all, not just women, even equality for him. And if he doesn't support feminism he is a sexist pig,…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 02:17 AM
1

this is what paranoid / selfish / untrustworthy (victimizers projecting their traits on others) or trauma survivors (unlucky, unhealed victims) tend to believe. LOL Really? Surely you can't be that naive? When more is at stake, when there is more to lose, when things matter more, people up the ante and become far more "dark triad", even normal people. This is a fact of basic human psychology. Go ahead and sing sweet songs of people's loving behaviour, but you are always going to finish last. Are…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:15 AM
1

tearing everything else down. You quoted MoneyOverSluts. Who do you think he was referring to when he said that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:17 PM
1

and when TRP resorts to calling them literal scum I did go to the opposite spectrum of what you said here. If single mothers are "literal scum" according to TRP. "wonderful angels" is the opposite side of the spectrum according to TBP (or actually most of society). I polarized it to make a point. It is a cost/benefit risk/reward analysis of the single mother and her situation that is the problem, not her personality. Did I come across as "upset"? Hmmm... Interesting...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:10 PM
1

The single mother thing is sensitive here because many people were raised by them This made me laugh... It is predictable that you are BP, if you were raised by a single mother. Just like it is predictable that daughters of single mothers have "daddy issues". Not saying that is always 100% correct, just that it is >50% correct and therefore predictable. Memes and beliefs are generational. Transferred from parents to children. Sure, please tell me how all single mothers are such wonderful angels …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 10:04 PM
1

Why are you here again, anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:48 PM
1

Because all you do on this sub is tear women down 1) Women are not everything... or did you not know that? We also tear down men. Captain-Save-A-Ho, beta, mangina, white knight. We are very fair about it, we tear down both genders. 2) Have you listened to feminists lately? "Everything is sexist. Everything is racist. Everything is homophobic. And you have to point it all out." - Anita Sarkeesian. 3) Feminists do want to tear everything down... There is not a single important thing that feminists…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:45 PM
1

How is this for an example... Why I won't date another male feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:44 PM
1

I believe that mutually beneficial cooperation is the gold standard of social interaction/business/relationships and always do my best to move towards it. However what I believe is irrelevant when examining reality. People just don't care what I (or you) believe. The reality is there are way too many fuck up people that want to fuck you over. If you don't know what or how they are doing it ... you are fucked by default. A win-win situation is always better than a win-lose situation. But when pus…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:35 PM
5

Seriously, just ask any non-masculine guy. My friend is small and effeminate (but not gay)... he just can't get a date. And I really feel for him, because if there is anyone in this world that deserves love, it is him.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 06:36 PM
1

Because those fucked up people are going to fuck with you as soon as you gain even a little authority/power or even are in line for a promotion to it. Enjoy your naivety. Ignorance is BLISS. But waking up from fantasyland really hurts, but you will find that out for yourself, or never achieve anything. Or are you going to try tell everyone that office politics does not exist. That those fuck up people won't try sabotage your chance at a promotion so they can get it themselves. They won't spread …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 06:15 PM
2

(as opposed to reasoned criticism of extreme feminism) I'm wondering if you really think that TRP's purpose is to criticize feminism. Do you really? I thought TRP was an alternate paradigm for sexual/relationship strategy that examines what is effective. Any TRP criticism of feminism is an interesting aside of female behaviour, not its purpose. so extreme and genuinely misogynistic Yes we have heard this over and over again... "I don't like what TRP have to say, and because they are discussing w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:13 PM
1

I'm confused by what you are trying to imply here. Because a man does not master something/anything it is that things fault for not being easy to master. Or is it the man's fault for not understanding it and applying it correctly? Are you really trying to equate sexual/relationship strategy with a taking a drug/medication? You do know that the "Red Pill" is a metaphor not an actual pill that can be swallowed. (I'm being facetious, because of course YOU know that.) "If the proportion of people ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 02:44 PM
1

truly promiscuous Okay, I'll bite. What does "truly promiscuous" mean? Only cheaters? 100+ sexual partners? In my opinion, not the dictionaries, a slut or "promiscuous women" means; "a women that is unmarriageable due to her sexual history, mostly promiscuity." A women can be a slut unmarriageable woman with just two previous sexual partners, for example a cheater or a cheating slut. Or a women that has an STD AKA a diseased slut unmarriageable woman (there is nuance to this, but it would just t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 06:26 PM
3

A simple strategy is better than no strategy. A simple strategy is better than a strategy that is too complex to execute. RP is a simple strategy. Focus on what you can control, yourself. Understand your enemy. Understand yourself. Understand the environment. (If you are wondering who the enemy is, it is the people that can rob you of more than half your assets, your salary, your children, your dignity, and even your freedom. Please, go ahead, and tell me how they are really your allies and frie…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 02:43 PM
4

One very important idea is to have firm life goals; Then ask, does this choice add/aid or subtract/hinder your life goals? Is this decision going to matter afterwards? Is it fixable if you make a mistake? (It takes two seconds to do this, don't belabour it!) Most your decisions are not important... face it, no one cares, just make a choice already and stick with it. (Unless very compelling logical evidence proves that the another choice is better, then change your mind, if it is not too late. Yo…
/r/askTRP06/11/15 10:18 PM
2

I just want to add to this. You need to understand your feelings and how they influence you and your decision making. Not all feelings are always valid. Think of paranoia, phobias, anxiety disorders as extreme examples of invalid feelings. You also need to know the logical fallacies and cognitive biases and use them to check you own thinking and feelings.
/r/MGTOW04/11/15 05:58 PM
2

Trust your intuition and your rationality. If your intuition says to you not to do something (or to do something). Then use your logic to figure out why. Then make a cost/benefit analysis. Remember to take calculated risks. Sometimes they pay off, sometimes they don't. Just never invest more than you can afford to lose. Use both your intuition and your mind simultaneously. Why would you use only one system when both often fail? People that use both their feelings and their logic to make decision…
/r/MGTOW04/11/15 05:46 PM
2

I would recommend Jujitsu, preferably Small Circle Jujitsu. Specifically for beginner self-defence. Brazilian Jujitsu is best for one-on-one fair fights like MMA, however not so good for self-defence in tight cramped dirty alleys and against multiple opponents. Rolling around on the floor (in the back alley's mud and rubbish), wrestling, limits your mobility and and ability to respond to other dangers you might encounter. The reasons I recommend Jujitsu are: 1) Less injuries while learning which…
/r/askTRP01/11/15 01:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter