TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SuperBicycleTony Archive

View 3 posts and 319 comments by SuperBicycleTony on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Only if you're trying to be offensive.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 12:25 AM
2

the Republicans calmed down in the mid to late 00s. Right around when you were literally a traitor for using the term 'french fries'. Super-duper selective memory you have there. And yeah. Obama sure calmed them down.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:07 AM
16

Hence the weekly threads where the conservatives and liberals here grumble at each other.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 12:49 AM
10

To those people, the /s means 'sneer'.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:21 PM
0

Perhaps our recent infatuation with Brietbart as a subreddit is finally jumping the shark?
/r/MensRights15/02/15 03:47 AM
1

Not to sound prejudiced, but I think that's a conservative voter thing. They're not single issue voters, but going against them on any one of a number of issues completely disqualifies you. Take Ted Cruz (Please!). He was built in a tea party factory, but because of his immigration views, he's defective.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:07 AM
2

I'm on the left of the scale, and she terrifies me in ways that have zero to do with MR.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:39 PM
1

For fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:11 PM
1

It was a link to u/girlwriteswhat This is not a link for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:11 PM
1

It seems like everything else loses when they need to trade horses.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 12:57 AM
1

*pulls string* The Karissa36 says... MAN UP SHITLORD
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:57 PM
4

Well... yeah. Think of their track record. They made a name for themselves by inventing a scandal whole cloth and using it to attack the libruls.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:53 PM
7

If they don't know what men's rights is, and they already have a negative impression of menist... it seems like you're passing over something that would make them curious in favor of something that would make them angry. If your real goal is discussion, you done goofed. Based on points 2 and 3 though, you were just trolling them, which I wouldn't support.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:29 PM
4

Tell that to my fatty pubis.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:20 AM
1

He has consistently disparaged the idea of an MRA since he learned what it was. He's repeatedly said he only considers divorce and paternity legitimate issues. His most recent podcast, he describes MRAs as "guys who just need to get over it."
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:59 AM
1

I was really hoping that first one was real.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:23 PM
1

Pics or it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:59 AM
1

I have seen some people advocate for that stance (matriarchy) on here, but I don't think it is inherently indicative of the movement. You don't see that, you see people talking about gynocentrism. It's a huge difference and an important distinction.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 02:44 AM
13

The first rule of privilege is that you do not talk about privilege. The second rule of privilege is that WE talk about privilege.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:55 AM
1

I run noscript in firefox. The only thing on the page that works for me is the text, and I'm not a fan of playing whitelist roulette until I make it work.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:22 AM
1

The 4th image in the set is about bagspreading. Try reading the article mate. If a webpage has over twenty websites running scripts through it, I'm not looking at pictures.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 01:45 AM
1

How could you remember what you didn't read in the first place?
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:25 PM
1

But you're disagreeing with my own opinion of what happened to me personally No, asshole. I'm not. If you had taken your own hypocritical fucking advice and read what ANYONE has written... Holy shit, you're just not worth it. Have fun with your persecution complex and apparent brain damage.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:42 PM
1

So basically disagreeing with you is evidence that you're right. (About the other thing that we're not even fucking talking about). You know who you claim to hate that acts exactly like that?
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:30 PM
0

telling you how you were supposed to feel. Exactly where are you seeing this?
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:12 PM
1

I never said it was worse or better. Again you ignore what people are actually saying to you, choosing instead to pretend that they're attacking you for a completely separate point. Bro do you even read? Fucking irony.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:10 PM
0

Yes, tumblrina. I would. It's just as disgusting when a woman uses the fact that she was molested as a child as a weapon in an argument, to shut down anyone who disagrees with you. And not about your experience, but your opinion about other peoples' experiences. Which you have now consistently tried to play off as a personal attack against you. And so you come here hunting for our approval/brigading. You may hate tumblrinas, but you act and think exactly like one.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:04 PM
1

Or the reason I called you a cunt is your behavior. Specifically crying victim when all someone does is politely disagree with you. Kind of like what you're doing here.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:48 PM
1

Weirdo.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:45 PM
-1

You tried to say being molested as a boy is different than being molested as a girl. I see someone disagreeing with you I see you being a cunt in response and trying to make it as if you were being attacked in a way that you plainly were not. I agree with the other guy. You're basically a tumblrina, and you've come here for a fee-fee army.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:01 PM
26

The only thing I take from that is "Behave as if you are asexual." Like they're running out of 'nice guys' to complain about.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:07 PM
1

Seriously, guys. It says 'inflammable'. IN-flammable.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 08:05 PM
0

Comparing the behavior of two groups? Not to me you're not! Feminism is democrat and that's that! Thanks for the conservative zero-think.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:40 AM
1

(Leftists, dont read the following, just downvote..) The right is full of cunty babies who, exactly like feminists, can't overcome their persecution complex for the sake of intelligent conversation for any amount of time. And then just like feminists, when the adults in the room turn their nose up at your childish behavior, you only use it as more evidence for your persecution complex.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:25 AM
2

Here's my unpopular opinion: I don't care how badly giving equal rights breaks the system. Fix it later, and fix it around the fact that people have equal rights. Hell, if men had the same reproductive rights as women, not only would we have this, but we'd also be able to demand an abortion of a baby we don't want. The PC solution, that you be able to walk away, is not the same as having the right not to be a father.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 09:52 AM
3

That's standard for any thought provoking comment here. You're going to pat a hole in your back if you don't pace yourself.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:09 AM
2

Ummmm The Boko Haram case. They came around for a second round of slaughtering the boys, and kidnapped the girls who had gotten off with a warning previously. Best way to find an article would be to search for the 'rabble rabble' here. It didn't get much media penetration, since they were so busy focusing on the fact that they were children and not their gender.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:06 AM
2

As cheap and numerous as they are, I still wouldn't scoff at the legal expertise of a law school graduate. You presented it as evidence you were smart; that you could speak with authority on this topic. And then you turned the insult around to attack expertise... on this topic. Let that sit for a minute. I was talking about sensibly and practically considering the issue of domestic violence with respect to what sort of actions should be considered worrisome Already your objective is something ot…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:05 AM
1

Understanding what you're saying and watching people get upset at a misunderstanding has made for a frustrating few minutes. Sorry I couldn't get your posts back to positive.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 02:12 AM
1

As for your actual point, I understand it just fine, and I wholeheartedly disagree. As an outside observer, no. You don't. And just like the feminists you disagree with, you seem to only care about the political implications of the research and not the purpose of the research: understanding the subject. And a JD in law doesn't make you smart, it makes you cheap and numerous. And it sure as hell doesn't teach you anything about research methods, which is what this conversation revolves around.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 02:03 AM
1

EVERYBODY BACK OFF, HIS FEELS NEED ROOM.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 01:35 AM
-3

I know some people around here and on reddit aren't keen on Breitbart They publish lies, edit their source material, and have been caught red handed doing so. The only people 'keen' on breitbart are conservatives who see journalism as a partisan weapon, and nothing else.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:59 AM
7

Why? Oh its because they are a dreaded conservative outlet, so are evil, stupid, racist, and durdurdur. They intentionally misled the public and scammed a charity in order to muckrake for the sake of a national election. Committing libel (paid 100k in damages). At the cost of the charity ultimately closing its doors. Refusing to issue a correction when the entire debacle was exposed publicly (at least to the non-lunatic right, who peek outside of their media bubble). And that's just one example …
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:45 AM
16

The apology doesn't satisfy them, it just emboldens them. Now even the guy who they're upset with admits they're right. They're going to want some tangible punishment levied. His job, probably.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 09:00 PM
1

I didn't want to reply to you again, but I have to say that its very interesting that you think its a possibility that I could be a woman because I'm not agreeing 100% with whatever other mens' rights advocates are saying. I think it says something about you that you automatically jump to the conclusion that anyone who isn't a mens' rights nazi could be a woman. Check my post history. I'm definitely a man. You caught me. When we were talking earlier, I automatically assumed you could be either m…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 10:20 AM
1

Clearly if we cannot agree on a plain language interpretation of your repeated words, we're not going to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:28 AM
1

Your position is that these kids should just sit there and wait for the school administration to completely change their philosophy and treat them equally. Your position is that the perceived "near" insult to trans people should preclude them from obtaining equal rights. In this case where mens rights is in conflict with not the rights, but the feelings not of trans people, BUT YOU PERSONALLY. And in this conflict, you chose your own feelings. Feel free to critique.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:59 AM
2

And honestly, the whole idea of "winning" at a 4-reply interaction is preposterous and makes you look immature af. As immature as posting a reply filled with nothing but insults (which is the end of the argument by the way), and then completely re-writing it after the reply? Or as immature as doing that, then trying to take the high road (to run away) while spewing even more insults? You really see yourself through rose colored glasses, don't you?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:47 AM
1

You reprise your argument in your denial of it. "Sure men should be treated equally... but not if they have to do something that I can rationalize to sound like (edit) it comes close to what I would be able to paint as oppression" You can't pretend I haven't given you a fair hearing. You've had the opportunity to express your opinion several times, with several different wordings. This is what you believe. Have some intellectual integrity for God's sake.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:35 AM
1

Surely you're aware of the transphobic canard of cisgendered men dressing up as women to sexually assault women in bathrooms/changerooms, etc... Surely you're literate enough to understand what a red herring is. We're talking about men lying to school administrators about their gender identity as a work around for the gender discrimination they're facing. How does your comment inform that discussion? It only distracts from it. And I understand how you might be getting uncomfortable with this dis…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:27 AM
1

certain legally equal societal statuses And please go ahead. Call me 'transphobic' and become a pure-blood SJW. Remove any true meaning from the word. Your feelings are more important than even your own cause, apparently. But who knows? Maybe when you start acting exactly like feminists, they'll finally accept you.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:18 AM
5

EDIT: The original comment NietzscheF posted contained only one sentence: accusing me of being a redpiller because of the 'sweeping generalization' in the text (s)he posted above You can see for yourself by using this tool: http://uneddit.com/ Look at that. Resorting to nothing but calling names. Usually arguments don't have such a clear winner. Thank you. (Observers: notice how only my 'sweeping generalization' which used the exact same wording was a problem?)
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:12 AM
1

Ah the 'crypto' prefix. "I can't actually make a rational argument to accuse you of a particular position, but my feelings are quite enough."
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:10 AM
1

This comment is a perfect demonstration of why 'fee fees' are NOT important. They are subjective. And just like you did here and now, some emotionally compromised idiot is always going to be willing to complain about a perceived insult and insist it be taken just as seriously as an actual harm. Not even a perceived insult in your case. A perceived near miss. Entitlement. Pure and simple.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:00 AM
1

If that was your intent, I apologize for misinterpreting. But I'm pretty sure you were complaining about men finding a way to be treated equally by a state institution because it affects the feelings (not the rights) of another group. And if you care more about 'fee fees' than rights, you know where you can take your business.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:51 AM
5

but I can understand why many feminists don't take mens' rights advocates seriously Many feminists don't take mens' rights seriously because they are ideologically opposed to the notion. Your passive aggressive withholding and tone policing is useless here. That should be well known by now. No one gives a shit about your support for the message board because no one gives a shit about the message board. Just like you, we only care about the issues. But unlike you, most people here don't get their…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:45 AM
5

This movement would be worthless if it didn't treat people's feelings as valid and important. /r/feminism is that way. We care about equal treatment and equal rights.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:34 AM
7

Sorry if using a loophole to obtain equal treatment offends you. Your sensitivity is clearly worth more.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:26 AM
5

Good tact. Whine about the people making jokes about the unfair treatment rather than whine about the unfair treatment. You're right, you don't belong here.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:20 AM
0

Do nothing but complain that the world is too difficult for you to the point that the world itself bends to accommodate you, and yes. We are absolutely justified in making fun of you. You can A) suck it up, or B) complain that you're being treated unfairly BY THE SCHOOL. Or you can just whine EVEN MORE. That'll stop them from making fun of you.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:18 AM
1

I don't want to work in an office with a bunch of black people. Is that racist?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:56 AM
0

fyi, the correct phrase is: eating their cake and also wanting to have it as well. It just doesn't make a bit of sense the other way, but darned if it doesn't get repeated that way.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 06:24 AM
0

"I'm going to use my own child as a pawn in this argument to call you delusional" "ZOMG! You played off the insult I just used on you! OVER THE LINE" I wish I had all of this material from you when I first called you 'politically illiterate'. I could have gotten away with 'morally and intellectually bankrupt.'
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:50 PM
1

You're right. I rely on people like you making fools of themselves. The more self assured the better. Being correct in my terminology just gets me in the door. All I have to do is keep you talking, and people will rightly distance themselves from your beliefs.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:46 PM
1

Talking shit must be genetic.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:37 PM
1

Hey, it's your fantasy. Live it to the hilt! Cover yourself in glorious fantastical fakery! Teach me, sensai. I still rely on the actual meanings of words. I don't think I'm ready. This is nonsensical. Pretty much everything has gone over your head so far. At least you saw this one go by.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:34 PM
1

Economically literate too, which apparently you are not since you think capitalism and communism are politics. Not that maintaining logical consistency is anything you'd ever trouble yourself with. But thanks for the yucks.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:32 PM
1

I'm going to start feeling bad for beating up on you soon. How can someone define themselves as a communist when you're so self assured that communism isn't a political ideology? You're so sure of yourself! How could you possibly be wrong!? My sides.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:28 PM
1

It's not funny, you are. I think "wrong and strong" is hilarious. And now that you're saying that economics isn't a political issue, and doing it just to save face, you're a scream!
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:11 PM
1

I could use this comment to laugh at you for thinking you're entitled to your own facts, but I think it's much funnier that you omitted the other half of the sentence.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:03 PM
1

Oh. I stand corrected. Communism is not a political system and economics is not a political issue. (Someone please tell me this guy is trolling)
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:47 PM
4

bloody-minded refusal to acknowledge capitalism's many failure modes I'll never be accused of giving a shit about the economic opinion of a communist. Either you don't know the definition of communism, or you knowingly misused it to mean "anyone with anything bad to say about capitalism." There's your own quote in context. Context you provided yourself. It's not like I'm going out on a limb for this accusation.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:43 PM
4

In the very same thread where you throw around "communist" as if it doesn't have an actual definition. Yup. You're to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:28 PM
0

I'll never be accused of giving a shit about the economic opinion of a communist. My kingdom for a politically literate conservative.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:17 PM
77

This place seems to be getting worse with wild-eyed, far right "grr. libruls." conspiracy nuts. Just yesterday I was banging my head against a brick wall that believed the KKK is an active, militant wing of the Democratic party. It was upvoted.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:57 PM
7

And you've been making this claim following a decade of scandal where rape victims were found to be treated like shit by the police. Qualify this in a world where "treated like shit" includes being boiled alive under a shower head and wiped off the tile by your surviving inmates. Did they ask them questions about the crime? Such patriarchy. >:[
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:41 PM
17

I think 95% of redditors just assume they were downvoted for whatever reason makes them feel most upset in that context.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:35 PM
3

Maybe I'm just nostalgic for the early days of this sub, but I can't imagine MRAs shying away from debate because a lager sub is pounding their smaller one.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:43 AM
0

Going off his membership in the KKK? His elevation to office? Nah. Let's use the only metric that makes me feel good about my point being exposed as shit. (BTW, how happy are you that I'm not forcing you to defend what you originally said? "Feminists and the KKK ARE wings of the democrat (sic) party") Keep trying, buddy.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:01 AM
0

No shit? You picked the longest serving member of congress in its entire history to make your 'recency' point? Representing the liberal bastion of West Virginia? Sorry! I should have said 70 years! Haha.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:52 AM
0

I think it's cute how you're trying to salvage your point, but now with only generalities. What happened to the KKK? What party do they align with!? Haha.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:39 AM
1

I was calling you an idiot (subtly) because you're making this point as if the last 80 years didn't happen. That's why I took the jab about history. Now I'm openly calling you an idiot because you're fucking dense. I know their proper name is the Democratic Party, but there's noting democratic about them, so I don't use that name. Love the maturity level of the right. I just wish you could can it when it's not on topic. Guess that takes maturity.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:27 AM
0

You're right. I'm being immature.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:13 AM
0

You accused me of being sheltered because I don't usually run into people who would try to play on a joke they don't understand to retaliate. Staying away from childish hotheads like you doesn't an echo chamber make.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:39 PM
0

Eh, I don't. I'm just repeating shit I heard from people I've never met.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:31 PM
0

Actually it's pretty awesome.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:31 PM
0

Wow. You just tried to fire back in the format of a joke that went over your head. I've never run into anyone like you before.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:51 PM
-3

Some REAL History for you, not the FALSE history the UNION CONTROLLED public schools run by DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVES have force fed kids in a MINISTRY OF TRUTH style rewriting of history. Emphasis added for humor. How do you loons keep winning elections?
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:37 PM
0

Duh.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:10 PM
1

The video was exclusively black/hispanic men, and it was edited to be.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:08 PM
-4

The KKK and Feminists are both radical, militant wings of the Democrat Party ... Democrat Party Republic (sic) party people really don't like grammar or history. I've got a great idea: let's start a schism in this movement along major party lines! Based on the votes you got, the majority of us would rather bicker ignorantly.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:07 PM
33

This seems like a good thing to cross post. The image is very striking.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:00 PM
2

Pepperidge farm remembers when .np was just for linking to smaller subs from larger ones.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:32 AM
0

This has nothing to do with MR. Reported as politics spam.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:52 PM
1

...Seriously?
/r/MensRights21/10/14 06:29 AM
2

I got a job at a staffing company that basically allowed workplaces to discriminate by proxy. You could call them and ask for a specific kind of worker, then we'd all drop what we were doing and sort through ALL of our paper-only files until we found a white (light skinned hispanic works) girl under 35 that had the right skills. We 'hired' everyone who gave us an application, so we technically didn't discriminate. On one of the xeroxed driver's licenses we kept, the image was over exposed. "Ligh…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:01 AM
1

These are actual arguments real people have used.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:00 PM
4

Was her double probation secret?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:32 PM
1

The crazy thing about you is declaring victory over an argument that never occurred.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:03 PM
2

Wow, look at him go.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:11 AM
3

I have no use for your ego shielding delusion. But since you couldn't just keep it to yourself: No one is upset at you for having a differing opinion. You never expressed one. You came in, were a superior acting shithead, and got downvoted rightly for it. If that somehow vindicates you, congratulations. That really happened.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:43 AM
10

Hey look, some shitfaced kid came in here for no reason other than to scream "I'm better than you" and leave. Why not just leave?
/r/MensRights17/10/14 09:39 PM
1

Since the day you were born? You don't make the definitions. But even by your definition, patriarchy don't real. Now shouldn't you be off redefining words as being literally rape, and banning them?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:36 PM
1

Exhibit A
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:32 PM
2

Is that what patriarchy means today? I'm not subscribed to the newsletter.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:27 PM
2

"I'm the only smart person here!" -dumbest guy in the room
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:05 PM
7

I will say that being taken seriously is a privilege that women are not by nature of patriarchy afforded. LOL "I presented bigotry as fact. I'm not being taken seriously because PATRIARCHY." God, I wish that's what patriarchy meant. And that it existed.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:36 AM
3

Is it out of thin air? No. You misspelled yes. Don't bother replying unless it's to answer "Then where?" As in... you're spewing bullshit with nothing to back it up, with a hostile tone and clear bigotry against men... then where did all those upvotes come from?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:33 AM
6

Well I can at least thank you for ranting just to hear yourself speak where we can laugh at how ignorant an unhinged you are.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:29 AM
4

Disney princess syndrome.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:21 PM
0

That's not the spirit in which your original post is written. You're lying.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 12:29 AM
1

investigative purposes. So exactly what the hell are you doing here? Now that we've established you don't speak for feminism (despite speaking for feminism), and you have no credentials.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:41 PM
2

"Moderates" (coughlemmingscough) take pride in feminism being "an umbrella movement" in a desperate attempt to be seen as all-inclusive (but in reality is just a way to benefit from the radicals without having to label themselves as radical or police the movement in any way). Motte and Bailey argumentation. A staple of our new, glorious, post-modern intellectual landscape. The term needs to catch on more. Down in section two
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:23 PM
1

List your names and credentials. Specifically, the credentials that allow you to speak on behalf of the realtm feminist movement.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:19 PM
3

We really need to kill feminism. It's a self identifying label with zero qualifications that, for some reason, justifies coming in here and acting as an authority. What's even more hilarious about this one is how she (?) has no shame or irony in speaking for their entire movement. Holy shit. Look at her comments. There is no "my opinion", only "we". A hundred thousand people have been here for 6 years, discussing these issues. And every fucking week some fresh idiot comes here as if they're the …
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:07 PM
2

I didn't see that movie. Was the real bad guy a male?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 09:51 PM
1

Lucky they didn't shoot and kill you, like they did that other guy with the same story.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 07:38 PM
2

Terrorism, child predators, drugs, stealing music... they're all just pretenses. I agree with SpurdoBurdo.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:42 PM
3

You're just not jaded enough yet. Soon you'll be smugly predicting things like this.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:24 PM
11

A dollar says your friend never reads it. He already cashed in his social chips.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:20 AM
3

And every abused wife is directly at fault for not leaving. Same exact argument.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:30 AM
0

"librul media"
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:17 PM
-2

Zimmerman wasn't made white by the 'left'. He was made white by the media because 'hispanic guy shoots black guy' isn't an engaging narrative. They made a circus out of race baiting. That's all it was. And that's all it would be if the 'left/right' bullshit weren't so pervasive, and had to latch itself onto literally everything that happens.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 11:00 PM
0

dribble drivel Unless you literally mean the words were oozing from the sides of their mouths to the page.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 05:57 AM
5

We'll find that real one eventually.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:20 PM
1

Or maybe daycare is expensive.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:29 PM
1

edit: Don't downvote me without replying, you cowards.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:53 PM
9

Good. Easier than fighting with them.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:02 AM
2

Do subordinates get paid less than the president? If so, is the president himself included in those figures? And if both those things, is the premise that women should be paid more on average to make up for us voting for a man?
/r/MensRights25/08/14 11:26 PM
1

Even if we pretend that your post wasn't simply ad hominem, your entire post is simply personal attacks. How long are you going to keep saying you're right before you check if you're right? This is hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:44 PM
1

Educate yourself in an attempt to prove me wrong, please. That is not what an ad hominem fallacy is. That's what extremely stupid people who learn their vocabulary by reading internet message boards THINK ad hom is. It's honestly a great way to spot idiots. Like yourself. (Still not ad hom)
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:20 PM
1

Example for people who make this mistake: This comment contains no trace of ad hominem, you indefensible idiot.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:05 PM
1

Dammit, the idiot found my comment before I had the good sense to delete it.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 09:58 PM
2

Title: "Feminists..." Content: "My second cousin on Facebook..." Can we stop freaking out at social media?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:13 PM
5

You can't have a free market if there are artificial distortions to it, and in anarchy there's nothing stopping the largest firms from doing so. In a free market, the customer is ideally informed. In anarchy, there's nothing stopping a fishmonger from labeling a cheap fish as an expensive fish, and selling it for a higher price. If a customer can't make an informed choice about their purchase, no free market exists. So no. You're entirely, horribly wrong. There's no such thing as a 'truly' free …
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:05 PM
1

It's the word substituted for 'a' when followed by a word that starts with a vowel sound.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:29 AM
1

AN
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:22 AM
1

It's funny how you say you're amused, but you're coming off as impotently butthurt.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:58 PM
2

Something something abortion.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:48 AM
2

"Because we blame women for sexual harassment".... "and sexual harassment against men doesn't even happen (they always want it perhaps?), so here's an example of an assault (perpetrated by a man, of course)" And the part about sexual urges is absolute horseshit. Female sexuality is celebrated. Men are told they're dangerous and that their sexual attention is rape. Notice also how pretty much every example is a women's issue from a decidedly woman centered perspective. The message at the end is p…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:51 AM
2

Sadly, it ended in tears, because, and I quote, "I have to live every day with the fear that a man could do that [rape] to me." And here's the kicker - even I'm a possible assailant. I was floored. To be told that one of my best friends felt that even I was capable of sexual violence toward her was mind blowing. I was crushed. The best part? I'm gay. And she KNOWS IT. Can we call this brainwashing yet, or would that be bad PR for us?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:40 PM
6

but frankly trying to "maximize your chances" is skeevy. ...Why? It seems like this sentiment plus "men aren't monsters for wanting sex" is double-speak. Are women creeps for wearing makeup?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:18 PM
1

Post modern, or post mortem? Because that seems a little extreme. Also, I'm terrible at dealing with these things.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:53 PM
4

you're being patronized and treated like an adorable misguided puppy when it comes to discussing problems facing men. This is the most infuriating part of being cognizant of these issues. I have no patience for someone trying to calmly explain to me the cultural orthodoxy that was hammered into my head since I was in kindergarten. It's like trying to tell a recent atheist about the flood, and being condescending about it. I've had an eye this sub for almost as long as it's been around, on variou…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 10:33 PM
9

Ah, the gender wars. Four words in, I know everything about to be said is condescending, simplistic and delivered with an absolutely pukey level of self importance.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 10:25 PM
4

By calling the police?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 10:19 PM
14

None of your posts or replies show up to anyone but yourself. There's no indication that you've been banned, so you could go days or weeks without realizing you've been effectively silenced. It's supposed to be for spam bots, but there's no such thing as a power that won't be abused if the person in charge can get away with it.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:14 PM
1

...a nose?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:50 PM
3

Smug troll is smug.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:39 AM
1

You're confusing the means with the end.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:05 AM
3

Feminism also instills in them a strong sense of self-righteousness only found in religion. I can personally attest to the self-righteous rage I flew in recently when browsing a certain other subreddit where the idea that the entire purpose of the MRM being exclusively to bash women was uncritically accepted. (Sorry for this sentence) I'm expecting angry orangereds, but fuck it. You lose a piece of your humanity when you try to shame people for defending (the other half of) rape victims.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:45 PM
5

The hysterical creativity of the SJW. No such thing as trying too hard.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:15 PM
2

1) I came here from there 2) I criticize srs for being a hate group that cynically hides behind social justice, not for flaunting their disrespect for rules they're not held to equally. edit: 3) How exactly did you find yourself here?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:40 PM
10

And don't grind your teeth TOO hard reading this comment if you recognize the dozens of mods/regulars from SRS. God forbid we 'brigade' a CMV calling us assholes where almost every comment is in agreement.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:17 AM
2

All OP had to do was look at the front page of this subreddit to have his view completely refuted. Willful ignorance. The entire thread is beating up the woozle strawman.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:17 AM
3

You don't have to stragegize or think rationally. You just have to grow up with that as an axiom.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:27 PM
3

When someone with a mental impairment shows themselves to be a danger to themselves or others, we lock them the fuck up.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:18 PM
7

The worst thing about this sub is all of the bumper sticker republicans.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:11 PM
1

Haha, look at him shake his little fists in rage because no one gave a shit about his trolling attempt.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:02 PM
1

is it?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:31 PM
8

So I guess black is in.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:52 PM
4

Sharp as a whip when it comes to apex fallacy, but look what happens when a conservative rag waves a welfare queen under your nose. And this thread should be downvoted to hell simply for the recruitment tool AMR could make from the comments.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:26 PM
2

At worst they could be fired??? Fuck that. I would call the police and the media.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 11:49 PM
0

I really like how you get so worked up. Responding to literally every comment worked up? then I really do feel sorry for you Good, because I give a shit about your pathetic attempt at passive aggression. Whiny fucking baby. Whhaaaaahhhh.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 11:31 PM
0

You should have just taken the advice, not given another example of why it was needed. And what the fuck difference does the subreddit make about your behavior? Baby.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 11:14 PM
0

Just be humble and shut up. Don't call other people names when you're under the bus. You look even more like a fucking moron. And a petty, whiny piece of shit. And since you asked, I'm downvoting you so that you get upset, have a negative experience, and will hopefully be less likely to participate in the future.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 11:01 PM
-4

Don't feel bad about the downvotes. The degree holders are upvoting you.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 10:55 PM
0

Gender, science and technology... What the hell does science have to do with gender or technology?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 09:14 PM
2

Come on now, that's not a real feminist. Real feminists sit around on message boards and point out who the fake feminists are when they say something that looks bad. And nothing else.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 09:10 PM
1

That would be a reasonable retort if you provided statistics showing the gender break down of mine workers. You kicked short.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:11 AM
1

Did you skip the lecture on enthropy? By no means do all chemical reactions require a catalyst.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:09 AM
8

I believe you do have the right to not provide it If you don't do anything wrong... and react according to how they are allowed to (which would unfortunately include physical restraining techniques) ... cops should be allowed to use violence against you. Your fucking words, you fucking weasel. I said that the title insinuated the cops intentionally killed the guy, when that was not the case. What the shit is this? Why did you say it? What the fuck does this have to do with what I said to you? Wh…
/r/MensRights27/02/14 02:03 AM
5

I read your bitchfest edit above, then I came down here to learn the asshole who called everyone an idiot believes cops should be able to use violence against someone who didn't do anything wrong. I like being called an idiot by people like you. I would like more people to know you think I'm an idiot.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:27 PM
2

That's not for losing your job, that's for being convicted of a crime.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:11 PM
8

You mean those extra hours at the security job won't moonlight itself?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:10 PM
15

as close to witnesses as possible. As if police give a fuck. Just another reason you're safer around criminals.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:02 PM
0

What's that? An innocuous statement that needs to be wildly extrapolated? No one casting pretentious and unsolicited judgement?? Super literal pedantic douche strikes again!!! ...Seriously, where do you get off? Loser.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 09:32 PM
1

I concede.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:44 PM
2

I read that like five times, I still have no idea what he's saying.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 09:44 AM
-3

Has anyone else started hating 'yo' as much as I have?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:08 AM
4

46% of Americans with corded phones who actually answer them who will actually sit for 45 minutes and respond to one of those polls...
/r/MensRights16/02/14 08:55 PM
0

Thinking that those two terms make me a hypocrite is pure "SJW bullshit". I'm not having an argument with someone for whom words don't have static definitions. Nor am I willing to have an argument with someone who immediately calls people who express their opinions a dumbass. Basically, you're a piece of shit. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 09:28 PM
0

That would be if I were being ironic. I'm really asking you. Were you aware of the things I listed in that post? Or am I wasting my time trying to get any kind of on point reply out of you now that you're in 'horns down' retard mode?
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:20 AM
-1

No, I sincerely thought you were trolling me. Oh my god, you. Do you understand what I'm saying? Do you see where I not only told you I wasn't arguing your point (twice) but that I actually agreed with it? And then you just went right on as you did? Holy shit. Dumbest man alive material here. And you're telling me now that you were being absolutely sincere? You don't want to hide behind irony at all?
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:28 AM
0

Jeez, I'm an idiot. I didn't realize you were trolling me. I mean no one is so stupid to have someone explicitly agree with their point, then continue to challenge them to disprove it. I mean even after being told twice that the 'bait' argument had nothing to do with what I was talking about. No one could possibly be that stupid and actually operate a keyboard. But I believed you actually were. You were just joking, right? Because you got me, but now I'm on to you. Silly.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:16 AM
1

Check oot the y axes. I found the Canadian.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:33 AM
0

Your point was uninteresting. It's the kind of 'no shit' platitude I would expect from someone 20 years your younger, sir. That assumption, sir, was why I gave you entirely too much credit. I thought of you as a reasonably intelligent 15 year old instead of a surprisingly stupid near-40 year old. The sentence I quoted was the only thing I cared about in your post, as it's the kind of thing a self congratulatory, know-it-all child would say after spouting some uninteresting platitude. I thought I…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:29 AM
1

Limit your reading to only what I quoted, mister knee jerk. I don't care about the argument you made before it or the context in general. That is the most uncomfortably pompous, douchey teenager statement I've ever read in my entire life. I promise that if you come back here in 5 years, reading that will make your skin crawl.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:15 AM
1

Easy there. I switched names just because I liked a song.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:04 AM
1

This intelligent "if/then" analysis of a situation was brought to you by logic, laying devastating waste to emotion everywhere it goes. Douche chills.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:01 AM
1

I learn now that I've developed an undeservedly high opinion of 2XC.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 12:30 AM
0

The aggression was the message.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:30 PM
1

Shamed individually for not wanting sex, shamed at a societal level for wanting sex. Woe is the kid that overly heeds the second message only to hear the first for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:14 PM
9

Notice how the gamur grrl will at once reduce the male specimen to nothing more than his sexual desire (automatically assumed without fail this is his only interest/attribute), while at the same time will loudly declare him sexually undesirable. In this way she will scream misogyny. But she's nothing but a fucking sexist bully.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:52 PM
-1

Can you believe it? After acting as you just saw, this piece of shit has the gall to call someone else a bully.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:45 PM
1

ZimeaglaZ, you're a dumbass. The difference between an upvote and a downvote. Fuck off. And don't let the irony of calling someone a 'dumbass' while scorning them about their lack of sensitivity for 'ableism' escape you. In every way SJW bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:18 PM
3

Of course it does. You're just seeing the rich vein of conservative traditionalists here teaming up with the concern trolls.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:27 PM
4

This is the product of constant concern trolling. I remember when instances of negative bias were fair game. For a place where stories are cycled by the day and 25 links are prominent, there is always going to be a range of importance. If you go around criticizing anything below 'separate fountains' it's either just an excuse to criticize or you can't see the trees for the forest.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:19 PM
2

we should hold her just as responsible for this false accusation as anyone else involved in it Yeah, make sure she gets a fair share of zero jail time.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:37 PM
0

Of course that's why you used the bastardized quote that leaves in all of those awkward starts and stops. So that you could ignore the actual message he was conveying in favor of your literal interpretation of two disparate, but adjacent thoughts. I understand that you have reasons to believe he said a thing; you hate him, and anything you can criticize, however imaginary, cannot go to waste. That directly contradicts the ridiculous liberal take that he was simply making the most mundane point o…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:41 AM
0

I can see how if you were predisposed to think a certain way, with enough effort, you could come to that conclusion. But you quoted the entire thing, then attributed things that he did not say. How is it even possible to do that? At this risk of sounding partisan, this is what people are talking about when they accuse republicans of having a disconnect with reality.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:32 AM
0

I would like to point out how ironic it is that you accuse me of a straw man when you couldn't be bothered to even confirm your distorted-ass conception of what you thought I was saying. Not ironic. Sleazy. Some asshole who needs to create fights online. You are the worst example of the penny arcade internet theorem I've come across in months.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:58 PM
1

You're the one who brought in senseless banter and insults. Not supported by the timeline. Yawn. Semi-reasonable points, eh? Great job trying to quantify your bull. Not my bull, stupid. Your bull. You made a semi-reasonable point here that I won't bother with because I've written you off as a human being because of your prior behavior. Reading comprehension would have helped you here. I see you found dynamite to keep digging yourself a hole now that you've hit rock bottom. And this has no actual…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:47 PM
-1

Whatever. Yours was the post that kicked off the 5 minute hate. In the face of your bullshit, I feel like I've kept a saintly temper. Even with this post, you're still trying to needle me. Troll?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:46 PM
-1

No, YOU go away. ...is this guy serious?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:41 PM
0

I would have saved my abusive replies for -after- my semi-reasonable ones. At this point I have no interest in what you have to say on any subject. Go. Fuck. Yourself. You fucking asshole.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:39 PM
-1

Aww. The baby. Continues to fling shit when I was done with the conversation, now wants to end the conversation when I didn't eat it. Good.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:37 PM
-1

You can't argue with what I said I didn't read what you said. I'm dealing with enough assholes spewing hate at me right now. I skimmed long enough to realize you were just one of many and decided I didn't need to put up with that shit. Maybe if you could muster an ounce of civility or humanity, it would be different. But that's apparently above your reach. I'm sparing myself the aggravation. Most of the arguments against me aren't even based on what I was trying to say. You can't argue with peop…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:30 PM
-1

I'm sorry, in the face of several people giving me undeserved abuse you wanted me to be the only rational, calm, polite person here? Might as well have called me a teapot. But thanks for holding me to a higher standard than yourself. Gives me the consolation of knowing I'm better than you.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:26 PM
1

Ah, oops. One of those things that happens when you delete something then add a different thought. I'll just leave it. Not like that's the part that's turning people stupid.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:24 PM
0

I'm no longer entertaining angry replies.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:20 PM
-1

You act in the exact same way as an SRSer, you just believe different things. Stay away from me. I like to talk to reasonable people. Edit: When you concede the possibility you might be wrong, a reasonable person pulls the horns in and starts to behave civilly. An SRSer smells weakness and just turns into a bigger asshole. Just felt that claim might have needed some explanation.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:02 PM
-2

You shoehorned politics where they don't belong. I come to this sub to get away from victimization complexes. I'm annoyed with the undercurrent of conservative traditionalists trying to turn this sub tribal.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:40 PM
-1

This reply confuses me. What? edit: ah. Clearly we're in 'downvote hivemind' mode, not 'words like big boys' mode. I miss when this place had ~10k members.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:30 PM
-16

Oh go fuck yourself. Maybe I misinterpreted what that guy said. You certainly didn't catch the point I was trying to make before you decided to go on your over the top aggressive rant at me (with the 100% certainty of an idiot). But I sure as hell don't feel like sticking around to figure out which wire got crossed, now.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:27 PM
7

If they're not -active- in academic feminism, political lobbying or in any kind of leadership position in the feminist sphere, they have no standing to say what a feminist is or is not. We have examples, numerous examples, of those types of people being quite different than what you would say. So I ask again, ignoring your feigned ignorance: What body of counter examples do you have to outweigh the body of examples we already have? No rhetoric. Examples.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:19 PM
3

It would be preposterous to claim Republicans want to abolish gun rights just because you found a few. Hell, you didn't even link to them. People you've met face to face? Bet none of them have ever lobbied congress or chaired an organization. Probably just random people who give themselves the title because it's somewhat of a cultural default, right? Got news for you: those are the fake feminists. We have a backlog of high ranking <Republicans> in <conservative> organizations talking about how t…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 05:09 PM
-8

I'm sorry, you -weren't- trying to sneak in a backdoor republican circlejerk where it absolutely doesn't belong?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 04:59 PM
-18

and liberalism in general Conservatives are fucking crazy. After 40-50 years of controlling the momentum in both policy and public discourse... it's time to start swinging back away from liberalism.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 04:54 PM
7

I'm sure I'm not the first to correct you, nor will I be the last, but that's not what Obama said with the line "you didn't build that". He was referring specifically to the roads and schools, not the actual achievements Jobs and the like accomplished. In Ethiopia, Steve Jobs wouldn't have done anything. With the advantage of the infrastructure and other listables, he had the opportunity to exercise his genius. Not that he didn't do it himself. That the environment he did it in was made by the p…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 05:21 AM
3

If the modern economy is more suited to women it is because the modern economy finally has enough space to absorb women's mediocrity. You know, SRS might actually have a point. This plus two comments specifically praising this line. This would be pretty hard to defend.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:29 PM
5

I'm from SRD so I've been keeping tabs of you guys for a while now. And /r/politics keeps tabs on the republican party. You would be rightfully laughed at for using that as a credential at one of their meetings. I was talking about the second highest upvoted piece of content on this sub from all time. And not the content of the discussion it sparked. Being both the point of the community and the act of posting to it, the limited scope of your criticism betrays both your bias and your intellectua…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:47 PM
8

Thank goodness you came and took a 5 minute glance at a community that's been around for over 4 years. You might not have been an authority on what they need to change if you didn't first take the time and gain that necessary perspective. I mean now that you've done it, I can't really call your appraisal of some link on the front page on a random day "one of the best pieces of content for your social movement" a bald faced straw man that an intellectually honest person would never feel the impul…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:21 PM
6

And look at all of the SRS and AMR moderators and frequent posters.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:01 PM
4

I look at that thread, and all I see are the angry white kids outside Little Rock elementary. Every single one of them felt justified, and every single one of them grew up feeling like a good person.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:47 PM
0

Whatever. You're off topic. To question someone's sources is not to voice a dissenting opinion. I'm not having a conversation where we equate the two.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:20 AM
1

That's not voicing a dissenting opinion though, that's just a distraction and concern trolling. Disagreeing with content is totally different than disagreeing with placement.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:06 AM
1

Only as closeted representatives
/r/MensRights23/01/14 08:20 PM
1

/r/politics is leaking again Rebuttal to silent downvote: Look at this asshole being super aggressive about an arbitrary hoop he's asking someone to jump through. For no reason. "Prove to me that someone on my 'side' said a thing, so I can disavow them and continue to have the same exact opinion". Pointless bickering, and a gross display of entitlement that he thinks he deserves an answer so much as to badger the guy who actually replied. This is the most worthless example of 'sport team' politi…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:55 PM
1

Sometimes its better to sink the ship or run it aground than turn it around. I wouldn't vote for you, but I know a lot of people who would put you in congress.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:57 AM
10

People surrounded by sycophants act in ways that can only be understood from their own bubble.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:14 PM
1

I've never seen anyone put quotation marks around a single letter of an initialism before, and I can't say I'm a fan.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:25 AM
1

That's a bum deal. Beer is way cheaper. Men should get psychiatrists too. Mental health isn't given as much weight as it should be.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:21 AM
1

Weiner was a married man and the pictures were taken in the context of unfaithfulness. Revenge porn is taken in the context of a trusting relationship.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:19 AM
2

No one here read the article.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:50 PM
-15

Only 43 per cent of the abused girls, and 29 per cent of the abused boys, have told anyone about it. If you're going to completely make a number up, at least be fair or rational about it. I'm supposed to believe boys are so much more forthcoming when adults don't even think it's as bad of a crime?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 03:55 PM
2

They should do something like remove the downvote button. Or switch the downvote button and the upvote one. Or people could just stop complaining about 5 downvotes.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:47 PM
2

flipping burgers to keep a roof over your head. What world do you live in? I'd like to move there. It sounds like they have realistic liveable wages.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:22 AM
2

The normal healthy culture you're trying to defend includes celebrity high diving.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:36 AM
1

Woah, wait. We have a right to privacy?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:08 AM
1

I don't at all understand how you could reach that conclusion. Need?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:55 AM
8

This is the actual Godwin's law. The popular interpretation is that the most significant, world altering series of events in the history of human kind should never be discussed, nor the lessons learned be applied to the world less than a century later. Basically, the masses are stupid.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:58 AM
3

Poor black people are more likely to live among other poor people, while poor white people tend to be more spread out. That's where a lot of that difference comes from.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:28 AM
2

You're just bitter because conservative comedians can't draw humor from reality without alienating their audience.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:25 AM
4

Easy now, you're asking for political knowledge before political opinion.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:14 AM
3

Just trying to get the average IQ back up to double digits there, Newt.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:10 AM
-2

And alchemy contributed to chemistry. Yes. It did. It led to chemistry. If feminism is a scientific field then Wow, look at you. It takes a special kind of intellectual dishonesty to try and change the whole topic of discussion. We're talking about psychology. You're not even arguing against a strawman; no one came close to saying that. Apparently you don't know much about "us" at all. I know I've been giving you way too much credit for critical thought, but only just now.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:46 PM
0

It seems like a significant portion of people's (yours specifically) brains here shut off when the word feminism shows up. Phrenology DID contribute to early psychology, just like Freud did. You don't have to have been correct to have an important impact, or to have laid groundwork for future research. Don't you guys have actual issues you could be frothing at the mouth over, instead of trying to tear down scientific fields? I mean, I know a lot of you are conservative, but still...
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:16 PM
1

Fascinating. Now tell us about the dangers of childhood vaccinations.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:58 PM
-2

God, I hope no one in physics ever used the F-word. I'd hate to have to turn my back on another entire field of research. /s Sometimes this subreddit really is an embarrassment. Fortunately, this is just ma99ie being butthurt for downvotes in other threads, which is also an embarrassing display, but not one we must share in.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:49 PM
11

There is no need for either of you to argue the decision in abstract
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:08 AM
1

This is happening because of your browser and search history, which google keeps. Try searching in a private browsing window.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:20 AM
2

That, or he just doesn't want to have a newspaper column written about him. He wants people showing up to his shows to laugh, not throw things at him. Why get dragged into a fight?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:03 AM
3

It does come off as kind of stuffy.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:07 PM
2

humans are not to be presented as anything but fully human people Fully human iff sexuality isn't human.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:27 AM
1

If you're going to dilute the meaning of 'trigger warning' to "these things are mentioned at all", doesn't your trigger warning itself become a trigger?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 07:46 PM
0

Confirmed troll.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:03 PM
0

You're either a weak troll or a delusional fuck. Either way, you're not worth your weight in base elements.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:51 PM
1

By not responding to your homophobic accusations? Get fucking lost. I hope to god you're just here to troll the subreddit. Well done.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:07 AM
1

You're right. We've been here since you (for god knows what reason) decided a good jab would be to call me "Steve", then when I tried to play along with it by referencing the song my name was based on, you went full retard homophobic and started 'calling me out' for being gay. Stupidest. Fuck. I've ever met.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:50 AM
1

Every time I think I've met the most retarded fucking person on this website, a new and improved abortion like you shows up.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:34 AM
2

...called me out? For what? What's rattling around in that angry little head of yours? What I think you're getting at is far too retarded to reply to without you explicitly confirming it for me.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:30 AM
2

Well look who turned aggro. I was trying to have a bit of fun with you, cunt. But I guess someone only comes here looking for fights. Homophobe.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:30 AM
1

Ride around on my bicycle like a.... sleeve?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:33 AM
0

I think you're incredibly naive.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:46 AM
1

--Frank Luntz
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:01 AM
2

It's also why female on male violence leads to more deaths. Is there an article or study you can point me to for this?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 02:45 AM
-2

So not criminal justice... just vigilante justice.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 02:41 AM
1

The unspoken assumption here is that if a man is attacked, the attacker is likely going to follow strict warrior code and ensure it is a fair fight. Which we all know is the method by which attacks on women are sexist.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:53 AM
0

What you need to do is get a less obvious user name.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:10 AM
3

Left handed people die sooner because the majority of tools, vehicles, ect are designed for right handed people, causing left handed people to have accidents at a higher rate. So essentially, the world is designed for right handed people to the detriment of left handed people. Your dismissive example is actually a very good analogy to undercut your own ignorant point.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:05 PM
1

Holy shit. Here we go. Right, because women never die in mass numbers in war. Right, because women are the only civilians? They were never taken as property by the conquerors. Because women have been the only slaves? War rape isn't a thing. I suppose since you didn't even bother to mention women in this sentence, you don't think it's 'a thing' for men? Most wars were not initiated by and for the benefit of male elites. Hey. Dumbass. All I said was that men are expected to go and die while women …
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:23 PM
2

lol Take it back to 9gag, childish fuck. If men were in control and women were not, why are they the ones who die while women live? Simple premise. Go.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:12 AM
3

THROUGHOUT HISTORY and not just in the past 100 years in one culture Selective reading at it's best. Every war that has ever been fought. Every dangerous job that has ever been done. From the Peloponnesian War "Come back on your shield or not at all" to the current revulsion feminists have towards the idea of a gender neutral draft. You're arguing against reality. And you're quoting fucking blogspam feminists to do it.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:53 AM
1

"Oh, you have examples from society as a whole? Well they don't matter because I can come back with how a fucking king acted. And until you reply with examples from every 20 years back to the beginning of written history, you're wrong because I say so." Fucking typical. Accusing people of using strawmen and cherry-picking examples of your own.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:25 AM
11

Historically, elite men have subjugated men and women for their own benefit. Surely that is not a matter of controversy? How is describing this pattern "inherently hateful" ? Because that's not what you're describing. You're describing a system of men subjugating women. Don't move the goalposts on me. If you wanted to be honest, you would describe the system as how it really was: women being given less agency in exchange for vastly fewer responsibilities and being given vastly more privilege tha…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:52 AM
20

We talk a lot about slut-shaming, but we never discuss virgin-shaming. That's not the analogous example. Slut shaming = creep shaming. And the reason no one should like feminism is because of it's core, indispensable assumption: patriarchy theory. The idea that men 1) created society 2) in order to subjugate women 3) for their own benefit. The core tenant of feminism is that men are so sociopathic as a species that they would do something like that, and is inherently hateful. If you don't believ…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:05 PM
11

so don't try and twist the fact that I pointed the moral dubiousness in your statement onto me. I didn't try to twist anything. I deliberately pointed out your moral judgement and made my opinion that you were out of line known. Why must your one way be abandoning the child and refusing to pay child support? Offer an alternative. Again with the butchered sense of equality, pregnancy isn't equal. It never has been and never will be, why does your version of equality always come down to abandoning…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:23 PM
14

I'll state it explicitly, and hope that in the time it takes you to respond, that you develop the common decency to reply without the implication that I'm morally deficient or ignorant of some unstated axiom: With all of the many ways women are legally allowed to absolve themselves of the responsiblitly of parenthood, from the moment of conception to after the child's birth, why can't men have just one way? I mean, if the concept of equality holds any value for you in the slightest, that is.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:54 PM
20

Now please reconcile what you've just said with the reality that women are fully within their rights to abandon the child to adoption and foster care.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:26 PM
2

Really. Wasn't the norm for people to work ~40 hours a week BEFORE we had robots? What the hell is going on?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:15 PM
2

Maybe before ridiculing all women, you might want to talk to one first, by your comment, it seems like not many females have ever talked to you. I found the sexist.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:43 AM
3

When he was on the beach, in her own words, he was vomiting up seawater. It sounds like he wasn't able to help himself. For all you (or she) know, he went out there in the first place to save her when she was in her moment of panic.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:49 AM
2

Lots of people take out loans they can't afford. It doesn't give you license or make it a good idea.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:51 PM
2

that's more or less what the buttons are for anyway. Disagreeing. You've been here for over a year. It's time for you to finally read the reddiquette guide.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:16 PM
3

Well clearly your only course of action is to downvote anyone with a differing opinion.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:57 AM
8

The trend of criminalizing/penalizing normal male behavior in school, creating a stifling and disadvantageous environment.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:53 AM
2

Dave Foley
/r/MensRights02/02/13 02:24 AM
3

Thank goodness you censored BaconHuffer's name.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:54 AM
2

We are taught to do so by women from an early age. That's the same error people make when they say women only dress in revealing clothing because men tell them to. It's society at large.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:48 AM
5

Don't forget prison. You can't go to school if you're incarcerated.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:01 AM
2

faux pas
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:21 AM
3

A jury originally convicted him. The appeal decision was a judge. I've heard the saying: "If you're innocent, ask for a bench trial. If you're guilty, ask for a jury."
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:32 PM
14

Superposition of all three stages at once.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:35 PM
9

On the face of it, this is typical child-in-adult-body syndrome. Fucking entitlement. "I'm mad, and since everyone else is simply a character in MY world, I get to do whatever I want to make myself feel on top again." Almost as if there were a moral obligation to 'show them'. I used to come here regularly on one of my old accounts, but haven't felt compelled for a while (because let's be honest guys, it gets a little repetitive) to visit. But in the last couple of days, the reddit community in t…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:17 PM
74

With the dividing line being 'load more comments'.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:23 PM
1

Exactly matching expectations.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:24 AM
1

I hope you have cancer, and you're lashing out at the world irrationally out of fear and pain. Because if you don't have that excuse, I hope you get cancer. Because you're a shit human being. Edit: if you actually have cancer, you should probably work on a more healthy coping mechanism. The guy you were an asshole to (and everyone who read through this) deserves an apology.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:51 PM
3

Holy shit, what a fucking asshole you are. Seriously. Out of nowhere and uncalled for.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:46 PM
2

It exacerbates psychiatric problems where they exist and creates them where they do not. Today's inmates are tomorrow's citizens, and with this overzealous attitude towards punishment we're only harming ourselves. Recidivism will result in an exponential amount of damage to our society.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 01:07 PM
5

Shit. Labor is so weak in this country that workers aren't exactly able to stand up for themselves even absent discrimination.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:11 AM
19

Men are violent beasts until they're saved by the nature of the better sex?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:07 AM
2

it's worse for us. Oppression olympics. It might have been worse for you twenty years ago, but now there's billboards of overweight women in their undies and photoshopped pictures of men in theirs. There's parity in each gender looking at the other as objects. Argue the point and we'll be here all day going over the top on each others' examples. The only difference is there's no concerted campaign to make men with less than ideal body types feel better about themselves. You don't get it, I NEVER…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:51 AM
1

you underestimate how sick women are of being treated like pieces of fuckmeat What? The opposite gender doesn't like being looked at simply as sexual objects by the other gender? WELCOME TO BOTH GENDERS. On one hand you don't want to be treated like children, but on the other you explicitly say that your reaction to being called a mean name is justifiably equal to the other side's reaction to being falsely imprisoned, raped while prison guards look on indifferently (possibly murdered), and given…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:38 PM
4

.Any men's rights activist who calls women dead weight pump and dumps is the male equivalent of a false-rape reporter. Holy shit. Women's feelings > men's lives. You're disgusting.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:33 PM
4

but they want to do so without damage to anybody Credit where it's not due.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 06:37 PM
9

I think it might be from the GOP wanting to disallow medications that prevent women from getting cervical cancer from being covered by health insurance/calling them whores when they argue in favor. When you make out the other side's positions in a cartoonish way, expect it to be done to you in turn.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:00 AM
2

Does this make more sense or were you looking for the first thing to criticize? Easy there, trigger finger. Okay, I didn't see the part about the 'not looking for a job', or the getting fired for not showing up. That changes my opinion.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:32 AM
17

Tagged as Rick Santorum's daughter.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:28 AM
2

So when the average term of unemployment in this economy is about six months... the fact that he took over six months to find a job is evidence that he's a pathologically childish slacker? And this is still a valid criticism even after he finds a job? I don't have an articulate reaction to this. It just seems unreasonable.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:19 AM
2

I like that quote. Pretty much sums up my opinion of Bill Maher.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:50 AM
0

The Jewish banking conspiracy is bad for Jews too. Jews shouldn't be anti-antisemitic. The holocaust is about solving problems forever.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:28 AM
1

I was answering why not everyone can grow up to be a brain surgeon and speaking in generalities. You're reading in a hell of a lot that's not there.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:15 PM
1

If I wanted to live in this world of yours, where you can use the language of thinking persons and be completely unaware of your surroundings, how much drugs do I need to take? Everyone plays fairly and nobody's poor! Ice cream never melts and Lassie is chasing sheep at grandma's farm! Jesus loves me and I'm never going to die! :D
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:59 AM
1

Vapid passive aggression not needed.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 09:39 AM
0

Rampant inequality and systemic corruption in every facet of life.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 06:35 AM
6

Anyone who thinks psychology favors men over women has never studied psychology.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 06:27 AM
2

OMG HE SAID LYNCH MOB, MORAL PANIC!!!
/r/MensRights03/12/11 05:44 AM
2

Reading this subreddit is like following Ron Paul. There's a lot of things to like about it, so you want to throw your support in... but then he says something that absolutely curls your toes, and you have to start drawing a pro/con diagram in your head.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 05:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter