TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Superman_Is_Black Archive

View 1 post and 69 comments by Superman_Is_Black on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

feminism "in theory" is already for that. The problem is execution. But that is the rub, say as a woman, you see inequalities for your gender (they do exist), what movement directly addresses it? feminism. Okay, now you are looking into feminism, is it fair? well it claims to be fair and for equality of all genders / races / etc. Upon this information, you join and start to focus efforts on problems affecting you. And that last sentence is the key part, feminists don't see the troubles of men, j…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:00 PM
1

I've never seen patriarchy so... if only that logic actually worked.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 08:56 PM
0

little bit of communism never hurt anyone.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:58 PM
1

really? on booze and pot? You know they did drug testing on people who are in poverty and found only roughly 2% were even casual users. The vast majority of druggies are middle class, because (and this will shock you) they can afford it. Some people are born into good families and lose it all to drugs, no doubt, but most of the poor people are poor from chronic issues not lifestyle choices. And even if they did use their money on booze and pot, why not? Do you really think that 8 bucks an hour j…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:57 PM
5

I was banned for saying that the 77% of what a man makes is explained away partly, not entirely, by various factors and that the number wasn't as bad as it seemed. Banned for derailing. Yeah, say pretty much whatever you want, as long as the mod agrees
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:02 PM
6

one portion they recently found is due to marrying up. When two people marry, and one must move for a job, they will stay with the higher earner, which in most houses is still the man. They suspect the reasoning is that women tend to marry men that make more than they do, so when times comes to taking care of the children, or leaving work, the lower wage earner tends to leave.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 10:34 PM
-1

"in general"? so wrong views about being against MGM? wrong views about 50% longer prison sentences? Wrong view that women can in fact harm men... what wrong view in general are you talking about? or are you just trying to slander? (technically libel but slander sounds better)
/r/MensRights26/07/13 04:57 PM
3

have you noticed that Bush Jr followed after Bush Sr? it wasn't "random homeless man". It is the same wealthy families, year after year. Rand paul followed Ron Paul, how odd. How much of a "boys club" is coal mining? it is dominated by men, and most workplace deaths are male. This is why the term apex fallacy is starting to take hold. You are judging and entire group by the top. Yes, the top is doing well, but the bottom is doing shitty. Women tend to be middle, there are fewer homeless, suicida…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:36 PM
3

even if "men hold the power", that statement is vastly different than "all men hold the power".
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:32 PM
1

the question comes to do you look at the top (apex) or the bottom. Do men have even 10% of the number of shelters as women? the answer is no. Jail sentences are 50% longer for men. Basically if you look at the lowest or the top, you find men. Men occupy the extremes. It is easier for men to find a job in the higher ranks, but it is just as likely for a man to not get help at the bottom. So does the fact that men can find a high ranking job easier make the homeless man better off?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:45 PM
2

So the main difference, at least to me (i frequent both boards) is feminism claims to be about equality, but addresses it only via helping women. MRA do not claim to be about addressing equality, while we are fighting for equality, MRAs fight on behalf of men, addressing men's issues. Many MRAs are in fact egalitarians. The vs comes from the fact that feminism claims to address men's issues, but obviously doesn't. In reality, it is more like this. MRA addresses areas where MEN fall short on the …
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:36 PM
3

The shortest statement for MR is that MR addresses areas where Men fall short on the economic / social ladder. Another facet is the belief in equality of opportunity rather than equality of outcomes. If only 10% of applicants, then you shouldn't force a 50/50 split.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:34 PM
2

he did leave her after this incident.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:01 PM
2

I believe the idea is spouse abuse. That she is ruining his reputation to everyone they know because he was being responsible. She couldn't change the tires without him due to a previous DUI and suspended license. He was posting it to show that women are not always innocent. Is it men's rights? not so much, but it does show as video evidence of a woman who is throwing a tantrum, then texting on facebook to ruin his rep.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:59 PM
2

CFNM anyone?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:41 PM
11

the first goal to be have society even recognize men have issues. So right now, it is mainly awareness. Any issue we try to tackle, from custody law, to MGM, to boys dropping out of high school, most of it gets ignored. We are seen as somehow in control, the leaders of "the patriarchy", and thus when these legitimate issues are brought up, most of the time we are responded with "quite whining" or something to that effect. In fact, there are still people who believe men cannot be raped. So simply…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:31 PM
5

as always, just ask if FGM is okay for religious reasons, or not telling parents what to do. I don't see how it is okay to ban FGM, but then ok MGM, the only difference is the gender.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:24 PM
1

I'm still waiting for the female fantasy to be a nerd who can write code. Seeing as women seem to feel that this is all fantasy for men, sexy women and powerful men, I can only assume that women actually want the opposite, so an unshowered nerd who can code like a mofo...
/r/MensRights19/07/13 12:05 AM
0

Honestly, how does American Apparel sell clothes to women? By putting them on sexy women and putting those women in sexually suggestive ads. Why does this sell to women? Because women project the sexiness of the ad onto themselves. They want to be desirable like the women in the ads, so they buy the products to buy into that lifestyle. QFT
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:54 PM
6

some women have larger chests than lara, and no doubt some of those large boobed women wish they were off on adventures: Indiana Jones style. What is happening is other women are trying to regulate what is "normal" while ignoring the fact that this is normal. Some women have larger chests, but try to express that in a game and it is sexism. Depict a nerd, a body builder, and no one bats an eye. You make a nerd, and use every single stereotype, and it is all good. But a woman with boobs, stop the…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:53 PM
7

the picking on Lara comes from previous versions when they were limited on polygon count. Even then, they said she was like a DD or DDD (which some women are larger!). As polygon count went up, they smoothed it out, and she has gone from DDD to roughly a C now. But it is the history, she used to be big boobed, so in their eyes she will always be that way. Gaming will forever be guilty of it's crimes of yesteryear.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:43 PM
1

men have a higher pain threshold though. It takes more to "feel" the pain for a man, but a man will pass out from pain before a woman would.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:43 PM
2

Well this is obviously the result of GMO. See, GMO causes issues horomone problems and we all know poor black children often eat higher amounts of GMO. TM's beating of GZ can easily be traced to the fact that TM's extra GMO in his system drove him to violence. On a more serious note, one school changed from hotdogs and fries to salads / healthy food, and saw like a 20% reduction in school fights, every year during the 4 year study. That was my best attempt at putting it into environmentalist arg…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:52 PM
6

what an example how even among ourselves, we correct each other :)
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:59 PM
6

I saw the miss representation, and it wasn't nearly as feminist as I thought it would be. From the general look of this project, I would expect the same. While the author is a feminist, it appears she might be one of the "good ones". In that she actually believes men face their own set of challenges. These are good feminists, they do not deny that men have issues. They want to address these issues. I don't think (although I could be wrong) that they will relate it to like, "and you feel this way…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:58 PM
1

I can't help but laugh that in her video game review, she ruled out half of mario for not fitting in to her idea of what mario was, but when it comes to legos, the jewelry line is considered part of the problem. It seems like she only picks examples that fit her feminist view.. it is almost like she is wearing... Misogyny glasses. Everything, no matter how grey, dull, or bland, looks at least somewhat like Misogyny.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:48 AM
4

Unlike feminism, there is no restriction to posting questions in the sub proper. You also don't need to be a men's right to post a top comment. You can even disagree if you want, no banning here.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:16 AM
1

LOL... a v-neck as sexy.. .yeah.. I'll put on my v-neck and go out to the clubs, i'm sure that will get all the ladies. V-neck might be good when at home. I had a GF once who loved white-tank tops on me, but if I went up to her when we first met with one on, I wouldn't even gotten her name. It is completely different seeing a v-neck on someone you are already attracted to, and a v-neck on a stranger walking up to you.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:12 PM
3

I think only going for the more attractive has to do with approaching women. My logic is that if you are going to be rejected, or have that possibility, then you will aim higher. Either you figured she is out of your league so no worries if you get rejected, and if she accepts you are excited. Honestly, I think if women asked more men out, they would start to rate men more favorably. It doesn't take that many rejections from the "hot" guys / girls before you start to lower what you consider attr…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:08 PM
1

I think you are actually close, but the problem I see is men are not welcome into reproduction discussions for the very reason stated at the end of the video. That a man wanting to be free from 18 years of child support is not a welcomed topic among feminists. It is difficult for men to care about issues that do not involve them. While they may benefit, they have no control over those benefits. For instance, a woman has a choice on abortion, but a man has no say in becoming a father. So even if …
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:27 PM
1

you kind of answered it, but let me shoot this back at you. If it is behavior, or expected behavior that trains us, then why is it that teachers used to be mainly men and are now mainly women? except (again) at the extremes, being that high end college professors tend to be men. But if you go to kindergarten, it is mainly women. It was not always like this. It was once seen as men to be training people. So how is it, if we are teaching women to be in the house, that they are able to work into wh…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:02 PM
2

It sounded like a portion will, like about 1 Million. At least it said 1 million in punitive damages. I imagine a good chunk, if not all of those "damages" is to the guy, seeing as the school is getting back their money + interest + legal fees. I really hope he gets something.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:32 PM
1

that is an interesting take on professions, but why it is the specializing, or in other words, extremism in a field, seem to be around men mostly? Who cooks? people think woman. Who is the best cook in the world, most would think it is a man. Men, for whatever reason, tend to try to excel in various areas that they apply themselves to. From biological standpoint, I can't help but think that men are more extreme in general, seeing as genetically there is only 1 X and 1 Y, while women have 2 X, th…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 11:35 PM
1

I think I see what you are asking, although correct me if I am wrong. But it appears you are wondering about dealing with people being sexist as a way to curb risk. Women can get pregnant, therefore it is understandable to avoid risk, a company may not hire a woman. This is why many MRs believe in equal time off for maternity leave (to address this one issue). But the basic premise is that we should have rules that level out these risks, but not force someone to take on risk that they do not wan…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:01 PM
1

entirely. Equality of opportunity is different than equality of outcomes. Equality of outcomes requires things like 50% of grads being men vs women. Equality of opportunity means that regardless of gender / race / etc, you are admitting at the same rate as everyone else. This dates back to Socrates, if a woman is able to perform a task as well as a man, there is no reason she shouldn't be allowed to. If a woman can play basketball as well as a man, she should be admitted to a team. That is equal…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:41 PM
1

Ideally those feminists would say, "We'll care about men's issues when a woman has the same realistic chance for a seat in Congress as a man would." http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/05/a-womans-edge/309284/ they actually do have an equal shot for being in congress, at least now. The problem becomes if women / men willing choose to not be in said areas, do you force it? if a board of CEO's do not have a woman on the board, should we force it? if California elects 0 women to congre…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:56 PM
1

Except many are in for non-violent drug offense or other minor crimes. Remember, just because you went to jail doesn't make you an unfit role model.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:38 PM
12

MR is humanistic as you describe it. But is only interested in topics that affect men on the grounds of gender. MR does not deny that biology plays an important role in motivation for many things, but realizes that humans are responsible for themselves. The key aspect is in general, MR wants equality of opportunity, not equality of outcomes. If 90% of engineers are men, and there is no reason why women cannot be engineers, then that is a free society (which is backed by research, the more free a…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:27 PM
4

yup, solid points. But remember, she can't even think anytime in history that his has ever happened... ever.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 10:42 PM
14

i love the 10 minute mark. The host cannot imagine why men's right would fight for men to be able to attend a feminist rally. Maybe... i dunno... to be fair? I might not go to every MRA event, but I would be upset if women were banned from attending. I might not go to many things, but that is no reason to not support fair treatment. I also love how to attend, you must sign a pledge that in good faith, you are a radical feminist. So even if you are just a woman, you must sign a pledge that you ar…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:20 PM
2

in theory, the mascot's name is johnathan or something like that.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:04 PM
1

i guess, i mean sure you can go either way, but remember at one point it was not legal to have an abortion. Women still had ways to give up the child after birth, yet through the demand of rights, were able to gain the rights to abortion, and now over time, the reasons for abortion can be anything, or nothing. I guess the reason many men use abortion is that one of the top reasons given for abortion is "not ready financially", so if that is one of the top reasons, it would reason to believe that…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:49 PM
1

women can avoid motherhood before the child is born, men cannot. As it is the woman's body, it is her choice. There is a great quote in the thread somewhere that reads like this: a person who has no control over another person cannot be held responsible for the decisions of the person by whom the original person had no say in the matter. Or with genders... if a man has no say in if a woman keeps a child or not, then we cannot force him into a situation against his will as well. In the case of ab…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:52 PM
4

as with me, the build up until the music burst into a rape, or whatever was said was like... "that is just over the top, no way someone would read that much into it". I guess it is poe's law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the idea that without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism.[1] …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:38 PM
1

I think I get what you are talking about, but my question becomes how someone like the woman in this discussion came to the conclusion that he might be a rapist. When stats significantly show that the odds are in her favor that he is not a rapist in the least. Rape happens at a rate of 27 in 100,000 as of 2010 (in the US). Stranger rape accounts for roughly 20% (911rape.org) of rapes. So that would mean in her situation, the odds she stumbled upon a rapist is 6 in 100,000 per year. If you notice…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 09:07 PM
1

Thank you for the references, and perhaps one day I can get to them, but can you not make your point without requiring books to be written about it? It has been my experience that if you cannot distill it down, then it is not well known. Maybe I need to be more specific, how goes the discourse of maleness apply to this situation? how is maleness a contributing factor to a woman feeling an irrational fear of a man?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:11 PM
1

Perhaps I don't understand, would you care to explain? What is the discourse of maleness? So far most maleness I have been taught has been only that of respect, controlling your actions, acting rational, being polite, etc. This was taught by my schools, parents, and society. When I act out of this norm, say insulting a woman, I am pressed by society to change my statements. But I am interested, what is the discourse of maleness?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:55 PM
1

Foucault further stated that power is always present and can both produce and constrain the truth. Constrain the truth. So again, if you, during a debate, are seen as a rapist and immoral person from the start of the debate, how can you arrive at truth? When everything you say is taken as a lie, as some sort of subverted moved to gain power and "control" women, how can you have a debate? Personally, it is only when both sides are willing to admit the other is working towards good ends that we ca…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:18 PM
1

perhaps I don't. I am going off of what google says Written or spoken communication or debate. I'll restate my same statement with the definition in it. "it is difficult to have a gender written or spoken communication or debate when one side is considered a rapist by the fact that they have a penis." Any more clear? Or would you care to explain how a debate can happen when one side is considered immoral and criminal before the debate even begins?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:51 PM
1

it is difficult to have a gender discourse when one side is considered a rapist by the fact that they have a penis. How, for instance, could this man have had a gender discourse with this women, when without saying a word she feared him and thought of him as a rapist? Do you honestly think that when they meet up at the gender debate, she is going to switch from "every man is a rapist" to "this man is just a decent human being with feelings the same as me"? I highly doubt it, in the future if she…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:44 PM
0

perhaps, but it does seem to be effective, even if it is not classy. Stay classy :)
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:15 AM
3

I liked this logic. There is no such thing as a "gamer guy", we are gamers. Same for women, there is no "gamer girl", only gamers. If you claim to be a gamer girl, you are telling every single gamer you have no idea what it means to be a gamer.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:10 PM
6

I find it a bit of hypocritical in what she said. MRASs are targeting feminists for protesting, by giving out personal information. but feminists are going to still name names and put MRAs personal information out there.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:32 PM
0

that isn't entirely true. Look at /r/atheism. Many people hate it, but regardless many people become atheist by it. By becoming "believers" in atheism, their fundamentals change. Likewise, memes can change the thinking of people, to show points of fallacy. If a politician thinks only 5% of the population wants equal prison sentencing, they might not vote for it, but if 95% want it, they are more likely. In a democracy, ideas are sometimes more powerful than action, but ideas without action is no…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:56 PM
2

that is most fallacies. My favorite is the the conspiracy fallacy. It is one of the more recent additions and might be a combination of many. Basically it goes like this: Any evidence that counters the argument being made is considered part of, or influenced by, the problem that the argument is addressing. So like patriarchy. If you present any evidence to counter the claim, it is because of patriarchy. So the only acceptable "evidence" is those that support patriarchy, and any descent is either…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:51 PM
2

I would step it further and say it also falls under selection biased (texas sharp shooter). They are picking the people at the top, rather than random sampling. If we randomly choose 100 men, and see if they have power, odds are not. But if we choose only those in power, then we will find they do. So to me, apex fallacy is a selection biased. So to tie in with you, selection biased (first fallacy) then applied to composition fallacy (second fallacy)
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:20 PM
2

you are correctly, my fallacy was off. It was red herring. Distracting by pointing out a different problem.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:46 PM
1

I have not played majora's mask, so I have no idea on it. I have no idea. From what I read in 2 minutes on wiki, it does star link as the primary character. Don't know if it involves defeating a great evil or saving the princess. You are right that one example doesn't invalidate the rest. The same for her videos as well, showing Mario and Zelda as the basis for if the "gaming industry is sexist" is hardly a better sample.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:46 PM
1

that is very true, hence I would have preferred her to more outline what she will be covering, and what point the videos are leading to. I guess I expect most well documented points to give an overview so that I can frame the information. She just hasn't given a frame yet.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:42 PM
1

I would feel bad even for a pedophile if the person was say 16. The reason for sympathy is unlike a 40 year old who only really has 40 more years to live, their life will only be 50% affected. These kids will have 90% of their lives affected. Imagine for a moment, something you did as a child, over 10 years ago, was holding you back today? Just imagine for a moment, even if you are 16 right now, imagine something you did when you were 6 labeled you a pedophile for life. So the sympathy is not fo…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:30 PM
5

you present a logical fallacy of red herring (not tu quoque as i previous said). You are distracting from the claim by trying to point out another big problem. That doesn't change the fact that there could be sexism in it. Now if we wanted to act, someone might say, "who gives a fuck, there are real issues..." but as far as debate, that is not a valid response.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:45 PM
7

claiming that history has anything to do with it is like complaining that final destination 5 is about death getting their souls. That is the plot of every single final destination. What about Saw? they are all very similar plots. That is why we call them a series. If a zelda game didn't have link as the main character, and his goal was not rescuing the princess / defeating ganandorf then it isn't a zelda. TL;DR; similar titles, similar plots.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:43 PM
3

I agree, I would like to see trend lines, to see if we are still trending. She could show trends among lines like "best selling games", but we really should know what is being "qualified". I know she isn't doing an experiment as much as just a study, but in experiments we should be able to make predictions without the data. I wish she would do that. Make the claim that "women are trivialized in best selling games" and then use the video series to make the point. Rather than that, we get a vague …
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:41 PM
37

good point, just realize her flaw is what is called selection biased. She is only choosing games that fill her criteria to prove her point. There was one rebuttal showing the hundreds of games that star women as the lead, they just didn't sell well. Her criteria for 80s and 90s appears to only be top sellers (bought mainly by men). But good catch at showing that modern games do feature women as leads. She even is shown as a much more dynamic character, but alas, this is just an anecdotal evidenc…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:23 PM
16

TIL: you must first "agree" with someone in order to "debate" them. Opposing views are not acceptable in a "debate"
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:18 PM
2

numbers could be off. According to wiki, in 2010 it was .7% of the population per year.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:14 PM
1

not only that, the top posts in there were showing how the MRA title was wrong. The few people who agreed with it were heavily voted down.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 11:57 PM
1

There we go! thank you. I knew it was a fallacy of some sort, but couldn't pin it. It might be a false cause fallacy as well, but we don't know. I haven't seen strong enough evidence (and feminist will admit this as well) to convince it is real. It is a theory that makes certain aspects make logical sense, but we know that isn't always true. Take Zues for instance, it was through lightning hit the ground because someone pissed off the gods. It was a theory that made lightning make sense. We know…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:31 PM
9

Patriarchy is like bringing in Hitler. It is the default thing that everything is compared to. Try to ask a feminist to explain something without using the word patriarchy. How is it discrimination if patriarchy didn't exist? See the point is that they are positing that patriarchy exists, and as the tumbler says, you must agree or you are a lost cause. The crux of feminism is based almost entirely on you accepting that we have / live in a patriarchy. To me, again going back to Hitler, is like sa…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter