TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Supervinyl Archive

View 1 post and 17 comments by Supervinyl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

FeminismSupervinyl/r/MensRights11/05/21 10:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Common sense is for idiots. Is it really that hard to just elaborate?
/r/MensRights12/05/21 05:33 AM
1

Counter-challenge. You’re both misandrist women who’s goals are making men look as ignorant and dumb-as-fuck as possible, only appealing to circle-jerk and echo-chamber logic and providing “evidence” without so much as a single link.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:03 AM
1

🤣🤣🤣 This is hilarious. If the essence of this sub is “Anyone who disagrees with me is a woman and a misandrist” it’s a complete joke.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:57 AM
2

I wouldn’t bother with this guy. He keeps referring to “many others” without specifying who they are or providing sources for their statements. Thanks, btw, for supplying a perspective that supports equal rights that isn’t about being a victim. Didn’t realize how many overly-sensitive men there are on this sub. I’ll probably unsubscribe and look for a sub where people aren’t as insane.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:50 AM
2

Source please
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:44 AM
2

No, please, explain the concept of research to me.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:43 AM
1

Yes, I’m well-versed in the function of the foreskin for sexual pleasure. And I stand by my statement. Episiotomies and husband stitches are worse IMO. And female genital mutilation usually involves complete removal of the clitoris. It’s not even remotely equivalent. It’s more akin to castration, but even that’s not an appropriate comparison, since the clitoris has twice as many nerve endings as the penis does. But sure, call it “circumcision” if that makes you feel better.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:08 AM
2

I’ve read plenty of things that I don’t just blindly accept. Discussion isn’t enough to persuade me, but if that’s all it takes for you, maybe you should do a self-examination to see if YOU possess the ethos to make your claims.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:59 PM
2

Depends on the feminist. The feminist women I know don’t want preferential treatment. They just don’t want to be discriminated against because they happen to be women. I’ve read and heard women publicly criticizing companies specifically BECAUSE they hired an unqualified woman (or African American, homosexual, or trans individual) just to check inclusivity boxes, when they had the option to hire someone qualified to fill the role who WOULDN’T check one of those boxes. I think the “feminists” you…
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:57 PM
0

Not true, this happened to my mother. She was put under for a routine gynecological exam, and when she woke up, the doctor had performed a complete and unnecessary hysterectomy on her against her wishes. Also, I’d rather give up my foreskin than experience the horrors of episiotomy or “husband stitches,” following the trauma of childbirth.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:51 PM
1

Thank you, agreed.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:44 PM
2

Yeah, if that was the case, it would be better. Forgive me if I’m not going to blindly take your word for it that that’s the case though.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:42 PM
1

I mean, I concur with your first statement. But more doesn’t always mean better.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:36 PM
2

Are women supposed to be pure innocent angels? News to me
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:30 PM
1

I hope I get more people responding to this to see if this is the general opinion of this sub, or if it’s a fringe opinion.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 10:51 PM
-1

Yeah, what a vague claim, right?
/r/MensRights11/05/21 10:36 PM
5

Yes you agree that it’s fucked up? Or yes, OP is the only one who thinks this?
/r/MensRights11/05/21 10:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter