TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Supremee_Playzz Archive

View 2 posts and 25 comments by Supremee_Playzz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes I have written papers on this topic. Is this hard to believe? Why are you mentioning this, in school we tend to do lots of stuff like this. Again, I can send you one (but it's in Greek so you'll have to wait an hour for me to translate it)
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:28 PM
1

She spread the word around and everyone treated me like some sort of secret rapist And hello? Exactly, I was accused of looking at someone - wasn't looking, my eyes locked with hers at random (I think she might have been looking at me first but no point to making assumptions) - you think this is normal?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:25 PM
1

Holy crap, have you been reading my texts at all? I'm not a "what if" victim, what I described to you - with that girl - happened, it took place at my school. I don't know how else to explain it. What you're saying is bassicly the same as saying " I haven't been raped once in my life, you being raped doesn't make sense. You're fabricating a problem that doesn't exist".
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:05 PM
1

It has lots to do with me. When I'm like you, and haven't done anything wrong - I've even fought against sexual assault and women's issues in my own ways (papers) - and when i just happen to look at a girl at my school, just cross eyes with her, and she gets offended and scared because her mind immediately thinks "all men are rapists, this guy is probably dangerous" and next day everyone thinks I'm a rapist, yeah, I have a problem with that. Because what people are gathering from this, is that b…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 02:48 PM
1

So even if 60% of women have been sexually assaulted, that justifies the phrase "all men are rapists"? Say 60% of women are sexually assaulted in their life. That’s a ton of women, a number that justifies a significant response. You don't know how that makes me feel as a man though, as a man who has never had or has any intent of sexually assaulting someone and fights against it. If we're bringing men down to bring women up, which Is what I'm gathering from this, that is extremely flawed. So wha…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 02:37 PM
1

I really can't see your point. What you're describing is bassicly a subcategory of "whataboutism", bassicly me saying that "oH itS 80% nOt 97%" like some kind of idiot misogynistic piece of crap that only wants to highlight the "pros". That's not what I'm doing at all though - if you could please find any proof as to me referring to such behavior in this thread please quote me - but again, the problem lies with the conclusion of this - that all men are rapists (referring to that paper floating a…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 09:02 PM
1

It's literally misinformation being spread about very serious topics. How is that not a problem.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 08:49 PM
1

It, again, has the impact of me going to school and sitting through presentations - and everyone agreeing with them - with a title such as "it's 97%of women but not all men?". How do you think this is okay
/r/MensRights05/12/21 08:00 PM
1

So people who call out flawed studies - studies that have huge impact on how we view things - they're the problem? Not the actual studies, you know?
/r/MensRights05/12/21 06:20 PM
2

I do care about one thing though. Most people, almost all of them, will just read the title of the article saying "97% of women have been sexually harrased", which then some articles translate to "have been sexually assaulted" . And so, when a "study" like that becomes so popular, and no one has even looked at the study itself, and at my school I see presentations such as "its 97% of females but its not all men?" yeah, I will care about that. I also do care about sexual assault, whether it's inf…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 07:05 AM
4

It could be right, but I like want phrases being thrown out there without any sort of proof, that's why I said it's not enough and that it's not a valid claim, because - at the time - it didn't have anything to back it up
/r/MensRights05/12/21 06:55 AM
5

Woah, I really don't know how to thank you guys for this, for the time and effort you put into these. THANKS !
/r/MensRights05/12/21 06:54 AM
7

I'll look into it, I read lots of books and the one you mentioned seems very interesting, as you said, very important for the age we live in
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:55 PM
40

Thank you guys, so much! This is huge for my paper, again, I really appreciate it - Thanks reddit!
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:53 PM
6

Exactly, that's what I thought of when I saw your comment - many people (and I'll admit, myself included lots of times) will most likely just look at the title of an article rather than the article itself, and many people just take what is being rephrased from other people as a true claim, when they haven't looked into it at all themselves.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:28 PM
12

You're right, that's the better question! Thanks!
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:20 PM
7

Looking at the study which you can find in the top comment, the report and criteria of the study is deeply flawed, so I don't think that those people saying the study is invalid are misogynistic.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:19 PM
1

I don't even want to comment on this...i guess do you have the footage or a link or something? Maybe I could somehow put it in my presentation, but again, not without proof. Thanks for the comment and the info
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:05 PM
23

You're right on that, but I just looked at the criterias for the studies and they're totally wrong and a FAR stretch. You're right on the fact that people take harrasment as assault, and that they're totally different things, and that we have to be clear when talking about such strong topics. Thank you!
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:51 PM
69

That's terrible, I'm so sorry it happened to you. I'm 16 and usually get into fights (non violence) about it at school, regarding men's issues, even when we're talking about women. We were analysing a feminist poem the other day, which was actually really nice and I really participated, until someone said (and everyone seemed to agree with him) that no one dares touch any men, ever (we were talking about violence), and I literally just turned my head and asked him "are you serious?". Then everyo…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:50 PM
12

Wha - are you serious? I literally just lost 5 braincells while reading this, whatever you wrote, I can't even respond to this.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:44 PM
61

Exactly what I needed, thank you!
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:43 PM
16

That's not a reliable claim. I can say that feminists "tend to do this" and feminists can make such claims as 1 /3 and we never get anywhere. The proper way to do this, I'm pretty sure is to have proof to back it up. Saying that it's from a feminist source just doesn't do it, and there are actually lots of good feminist publishists out there.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:43 PM
7

I have written 2 feminist articles (again, for my school) mostly about sexual assault and I think you didn't understand me well enough - because I didn't explain it well enough - but Im not downplaying anything. I believe we ought to be correct when we make such bald claims, because the particular essay I want to respond to at school , is one that has as a title : "it's 97% of women, but not all men?". So that is really important, and we again, can't make such bald claims. That's why we always h…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:37 PM
1

How do we know that the statistics on 97% are false? I've been hearing for quite a while that it's bs, and it makes total sense, but I'm currently making a presentation for men's rights at my school and I can't not have any sources on anything I say, so if anyone could link me to a reliable source on that, it would be great, thanks!
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter