TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SurDno Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by SurDno on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It was the other way around in the post right before it was deleted, which is what I was trying to tell you since the beginning of this discussion. OP even asked if it's "progress". So yes, you managed to misread it even after I told you many times to go read it again.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 05:14 AM
1

No, it's not explained in your post. Because your post says that only violence against women is counted as domestic violence, while OP shows the opposite, where only violence against men brought up the helpline.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 04:55 AM
1

No, *this* post does not show double standard against men, again, you haven't read it. Try it again very carefully, one word at a time. Only "why is a girl hitting me" brings up the domestic abuse hotline, NOT the other way around like you're trying to suggest. The link you posted does not support the post, it contradicts it.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 04:40 AM
1

No, I think this is your legitimate inability to read. The POST you're commenting under is treating "girl hitting me" as domestic violence and "boy hitting me" as not. What you're posting is direct contradiction to the post. Did you skim read it? How did you completely miss the point? I asked you three times if you read the post you're commenting under, and you still manage to read it backwards?
/r/MensRights30/07/26 04:35 AM
-1

LLMs aren't random number generators, but a pretrained model would give you exactly the same word-for-word result every time if there if it did not introduce randomness in its weight selection. "I got this result for prompt A and got conflicting result for prompt B" means absolutely, completely nothing, until you rerun those prompts for hundreds of times and average the result.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:53 AM
-1

No, not the post you shared, the post you're commenting under. Do you believe the results of this post are intentional human intervention?
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:50 AM
0

Have you even read the post you're commenting under? Are you suggesting google is intentionally treating "girl hitting me" worse than "boy hitting me"?
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:14 AM
-9

This “obvious bias” will change between one prompt to another, as has been proven hundreds of times with each of those posts. I just did the same search and it gave me the same answer for both, “obvious bias” my ass.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 02:23 AM
-9

Anyone trying to make drama from a result of what is essentially a random number generator is an idiot
/r/MensRights30/07/26 02:00 AM
5

I put it in this sub bc he has no real traditionally masculine traits(culturally and emotionally not physically) Do you think a sub for men’s rights is going to bring down men because they don’t live up to made up societal standards? Yes, cut your friend off. One less asshole in his life.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 06:35 PM
4

Only women are allowed to leave right now, and god they do use that opportunity. So I think the imbalance won’t be that strong.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 01:26 PM
27

Then this approach should work to both sexes.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:38 AM
9

I can totally imagine Ukrainian government sending women to war because a YouTube comment gained enough likes.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:26 PM
6

Because normal people can sense irony and sarcasm without anyone rubbing them in that. It literally quotes the original article with “stay in your own lane”.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 01:34 PM
28

Because not being silent could send you to jail. Not protests, even social media remarks that discredit the armed forces of the country can result in jail time. Do you consider that Chinese people support all the shit their government does simply because they’re unable to oppose it? What about North Korea?
/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:54 PM
2

Sometimes “then” instead of “than” changes your point completely.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:14 AM
2

The last place I'd expect men to be included.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 09:07 AM
2

Just like the simulations.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 04:54 PM
0

Fuck fishers. They get what they deserve, seriously.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 03:55 AM
1

I mean that's pure irony. It's fun.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:33 AM
1

I feel like we should stop calling MRAs 'MRAs' and just start calling people who aren't MRA 'sexist'. You are either a normal person or a sexist. (C) Vladimir Lenin
/r/MensRights27/12/19 12:37 AM
15

It is. Imagine it with genders reversed.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 09:36 PM
1

Modern problems require modern solutions. Not a single believer reads the Bible to notice the hypocrisy anyway.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 02:11 PM
25

We have reviewed the report and considered that your post violates Twitter Terms of Services.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:34 AM
3

It’s just that leftists are not getting censored.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:31 AM
1

Something like “I’m not the other girls”. Can’t remember.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 10:44 PM
8

It had been before she stated she is a woman.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 10:43 PM
20

According to r/WatchRedditDie she got downvoted to hell until she states she’s a woman, so no progress here.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 10:36 PM
35

But social justice warriors state that gender is not how you look but how you feel. So these guys, no matter how masculine they are, might be gender-neutral, gender-fluid, transgender or whatever else they can make up. It should not be her business.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:16 PM
5

Some people go vegan not for ethical reason but just because it’s in SJW list of right things to do. This is the great example.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 05:05 PM
0

It’s not like animals should be treated that way either.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 07:12 PM
1

What is tbf? To be <...>? Or is it a misspelling of tbh?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 03:30 PM
10

The point is setting the safe word as something you surely won’t say accidentally. Like pumpkin or Okavango delta.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 07:35 PM
12

In this particular case it’s more like mocking their style of speech.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:48 AM
9

Twenty eight. The rest are government drones.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:19 AM
1

TWHO in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:51 AM
10

You miss the point?
/r/MensRights26/05/19 12:23 PM
2

Then black people should enslave white people as “an expression of the centuries of oppression”, children should administer corporal punishment on their parents and animals should slaughter people for meat. That totally makes sense.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 06:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter