TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Suspicious-Yam5111 Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by Suspicious-Yam5111 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why would a woman resort to making more work for herself because she has 'tried other communication methods?' Why is she the victim here, playing blame games and giving herself unneeded work?
/r/MensRights05/07/26 06:07 PM
1

Who says it is because they are more impulsive? This may just be a case of correlation without causation.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 06:00 PM
5

That's commendable
/r/MensRights28/06/26 05:56 PM
-4

Porn is just sexual art or photography. If it keeps men weak in ways we don't understand, we mitigate those problems like we would for anything else in our society and lives.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 03:25 AM
2

Who says gay men are overwhelmingly masculine? Or that it is insulting or stereotypical to imply they would be feminine or effeminate? If anything, they would be afraid to be feminine, so they seek to overcompensate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 07:24 PM
1

I don't think not attacking someone's sexuality in the heat of the moment is proof of tolerance; they might just fear hypocrisy or overt bigotry. They'll then mask their hatred by undermining the person in other, indirect ways, like making them out to be creeps or some other of the myriad things people can scrounge up.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:35 AM
1

Who cares if they 'turn' the characters gay? I disregard the canon as a cheap and bad faith pandering to the heterosexual majority, and the romances and pairings are schlocky and mandatory; it's not just women who do this or like to see it, nor do I agree with the poisoning of the well in calling things 'stereotypes' (as all art relies on so-called 'stereotypes' that are stirring and attractive; you just call it that when it's not catering to the image you like projected). I'm not aware of these…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:32 AM
2

Witchcraft. Voodoo. Hexes
/r/MensRights27/04/26 07:21 PM
15

It's a degenerate species, mate. We're mortal and ignorant and full of diseases and flaws
/r/MensRights24/04/26 05:06 AM
1

So who determines what is narcissistic grandiosity and what is normality? Is the group or majority being opposed also narcissistic or suffering from a 'group narcissism,' or is it absolutely correct?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 08:42 AM
4

Aye, women don't want any competition from men of any age or gender expression. It's a real blow to your ego to be unattractive to a man you like because of unchangeable innate characteristics (like being a man, even a very attractive or feminine one), and women don't want to be in that position. So the man who is rejecting or not showing them the attention they are entitled to must be defective. In the past, it would have been because he was corrupted by a sodomite, or he saw a Greek statue or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 03:45 PM
2

People still shouldn't organize their personalities around natalism and see it ad their holy of holies. It is just an expectation, a duty- no need for sentimentalism or flanderization
/r/MensRights03/09/25 06:22 PM
1

Who says it's perfectly fine if they're not as gay as they thought? What objective moral standard do you have by which to say that? Maybe someone doesn't like that even the few gay people just default back to heterosexuality, even if only to a degree. No pressure on them to accept or be well-disposed towards everything and everyone in this world.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/25 08:47 AM
1

Why are parasocial relationships 'always unhealthy?' Why is this the one thing that is always bad, for fictional characters, celebrities, or deities/religious figures, hands down?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/25 08:46 AM
1

What's wrong with parasocial relationships?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/25 08:45 AM
1

What do you mean by fetishizing? And what's wrong with that? Are you fetishizing bisexuality or openness?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/25 08:36 AM
1

How do you prove all bi women don't love women less than lesbians? What are the odds you would love both sexes at a perfect 50-50 ratio? What's more likely- you can't serve two masters.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/25 08:35 AM
-2

I can't really be arsed with many of their comments. People calling me things, making me out to be a power bottom, or speculating about my sexuality never bothered me, even when I was really closeted and (hypocritically) homophobic. I quite enjoyed it. I don't think women calling someone uke or seme or dressing them up is in itself bad, just trying to harass or personally hook up with them (to 'turn them straight,' which isn't even funny). But this deriding of it as a 'fetish' and that it 'shoul…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/25 07:55 PM
0

It could just be that men are unattractive to most women, and our beauty ideals are shot because men need to be manly, and you cannot at the same time be manly and beautiful (think of a renaissance angel, or Greek sculpture, or the like; leagues beyond even Hollywood actors). No surprise you need to be less visually driven when your partner will be balding, bearded, and uninspiring for most of his life. Now, what is this about one of the characters in yaoi being a 'substitute for a girl?' That s…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/25 07:40 PM
-4

If you ship or sexualize real people, even as an extension of their character, why is this bad? Why do you view a 'real person' as 'less than a person?' This sounds reductionist and slanderous, you can view them as a real person while being invested in the persona they play, and you can sexualize other people without dehumanizing them.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/25 07:31 PM
-3

Wouldn't it be disrespectful of these artists' boundaries to tell them they cannot make and consume this artwork in their private communities? Why stop at artwork on the internet, why not crack down on art work people do not share, or private fantasies?
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/25 07:29 PM
-1

So, what is the problem with fetishizing men? You can't write two paragraphs about wanting to get screwed by an attractive man, and you're supposed to 'call this out?' Am I supposed to notify people before I have sexual fantasies about them, or talk about how attractive they are? Do you even have an objective moral standard to ground why 'fetishization' (whatever that exactly means) is bad, or is one supposed to indulge your personal feelings?
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/25 07:27 PM
1

Bi washing is the greater issue, what are you talking about? People are always forced to marry and get with the opposite sex, not to mention the interminable "are you sure you're not somewhat attracted? Are you sure you won't find the right woman?" No one is obligated to identify by a recently invented label to artificially inflate the numbers of those calling themselves 'bisexual.'
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/25 12:53 PM
1

I don't see the problem. I am one such person and consume the material they produce, only feeling insulted when they say things like 'by straight women, for straight women' or make it clear their communities are male-skeptical or testy towards men. Now, what is the problem with 'fetishizing?' Why does it concern you?
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/25 08:05 AM
2

Always the obsession with male sexuality and entertainment.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/25 08:41 AM
14

No wonder, considering how there are significantly more straight men and women than gay men and women
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 09:54 AM
7

Women posing alongside minorities they have historically oppressed, Season 3, Episode 29
/r/EverydayMisandry23/05/25 07:39 PM
1

Perhaps these women should focus on the homophobia and heterocentrism that makes gay men desire to marry them instead of reducing it to 'misogyny.'
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/25 02:31 PM
1

Gay men forced into straight marriages, women most affected
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/25 02:29 PM
0

As a cis gay man it's not fetishizing and I myself consume the material and like the presentation. It's just the hypocrisy of these fans I don't like
/r/EverydayMisandry28/04/25 06:21 AM
1

What is 'fetishizing?'
/r/EverydayMisandry28/04/25 06:20 AM
1

No, they are mostly straight women. BL manga, danmei novels, all that market for certain gay material is 'by and for straight women.'
/r/EverydayMisandry28/04/25 06:19 AM
1

How do you know? Forget the countless feminine men and manly women who went through the wringer of a traditional family
/r/MensRights03/04/25 09:59 AM
1

Is short-term pleasure bad? Is only long-term pleasure good, and is such pleasure not just composed of several, smaller short-term pleasures (e.g., remembering that you have children, or having someone by your side on your deathbed instead of having no one)? By that standard, you can just replace these long-term pleasures with other long-term pleasures, like friends, or remove the need altogether through abstinence or some kind of austerity. There's no inherent reason why these should be cheaper…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 12:57 PM
0

Essentially, women do all of what you said. Aside from the presumed need to reproduce or maintain human Earthly civilization, why should recreation and entertainment (and whatever else porn or video games, when indulged in healthfully) be less important than chasing women and relationships with women? A friend can cover the need for company or touch. Besides, you have accomplished what was needed; you have fulfilled your desire for external gain or conquest, and you have fulfilled your desire fo…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 12:36 PM
3

What's wrong with supernormal stimuli and indulging in pornography? Who says sensitivity to "natural rewards" like intimacy or social connection are lost, or are you implying that cutting porn or all other forms of satisfaction or supernormal stimuli will make you bored enough to crave that satisfaction from social connection? Any ways, it's not been my experience. The suppliers of porn are not necessarily exploiting other men, as any pleasure can be abused or damaging if used improperly, and th…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:28 PM
1

Sexualizing what are presumed to be platonic male relationships is not mutually exclusive to men having deep friendships. Just insist that men can show intimacy without necessarily being gay, not that all acts of male intimacy are merely platonic and cannot be read as more (if in fiction, as fictional characters cannot object to these interpretations, being unreal). Not to mention that this just feels highly reactive; I see more bellyaching about gay ships than an actual push for the kinds of so…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 11:39 AM
1

It should be totally fine to not have to compete with someone who may prefer the same or opposite sex, and then to be blamed for the relationship not working out, if you choose to enter into it (with someone who may just see you as a side dish on his or her way to the entrée).
/r/MensRights07/03/25 11:28 AM
-7

Is it mutually exclusive for them to want men to have friends but also ship same-sex characters on the basis of scenes of intimacy? Aye, friends can kiss or love each other, but this is also what lovers will do; perhaps it is anachronistic or naive to force a gay reading on that relationship in Tolkien's work, but it is by no means wrong or baseless.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 05:08 PM
0

So what is they do it? Besides, you cannot compare gay ships of some of the vast numbers of 'straight' (theyre fictional, who can pin them down for sure?) characters to straight ships of the few gay characters that gay people might strongly desire to have and identify with.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 05:05 PM
2

What is objectification in this context? Because I've heard people argue that compliments are objectifying in the bad way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 10:13 PM
1

Sure, but why only men? Why are women entitled to not changing anything, and men accommodating them and doing more work for their refusal to stop wielding the power (e.g., attractiveness) that they have?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 09:27 PM
1

Accentuating the parts of yourself that are sexually attractive, whether you know why you are doing this or not. That would be being sexual, or sexualizing yourself. You can, however, be sexually attractive without sexualizing yourself, that would be 'women simply existing,' without all of the mannerisms, ways of speaking, dressing, etc. that are supposed to be exciting or titillating to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 09:25 PM
1

Says who?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 09:17 PM
1

Why would that justify hating them? An intervention or something productive would be better than exacerbating their situation. It's like saying that it's fair to hate black men because they engage in armed violence (without analyzing the reasons why, and how these reasons should be addressed rather than engorging the prison industrial complex further).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 12:24 PM
1

No, it doesn't quite help. What is wrong with any of what you listed? Almost everything that is projected onto the outside makes others "passive." Having expectations, making predictions, holding people responsible, etc., requires that they be the passive recipient of something. But why do you need to think about the other person's feelings or sexuality? If there is a consensual scenario between two people where the 'passive' or 'sexualized' partner is aware of what is happening and is fine with…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 12:18 PM
1

How is it possible to treat people as ends in themselves? There is always an element of selfishness, even if it is just, for instance, the desire to fulfill your desire to give gifts or be charitable. In such an instance, you would just be using the recipient of a gift as a means to the end of fulfilling that desire, however tightly bound-up that desire is with their own interests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/25 05:09 PM
1

Substantiate even a single one of your claims. Beyond bad history and a fallacy of relative privation, I'm not seeing much. The 'strong' blame and resent the weak (or egalitarianism, or democracy, or individualism) all the time. ​People complained in the past and people today aren't these caricatures who only want a good life. A war? I'd like to see you fight in it
/r/MensRights25/12/24 11:27 AM
1

What was his source? Is his idea of narcissism or covert narcissism accurate to the research?
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:22 AM
1

The word involuntary doesn't concern women or the object of desire, just that there are characteristics that make these men undesirable that they cannot change. They do not 'choose' not to change and they are not 'lazy,' whatever you mean by these words (e.g., demoralization, lack of will-power, etc.). Not that women unconditionally owe them sex or whatever inane strawman you dishonestly push. So indeed, they are involuntarily celibate. They lack the qualities they need to get the thing they wan…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:19 AM
1

But why do men owe women a drastic 'stepping up' of their game? Why do women deserve to command other's emotions in this way, rather than lowering their standards or being more proactive? Why do women take precedence here?
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:04 AM
1

What are your sources on this?
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:47 PM
1

I'm curious, because as a gay man (AMAB, mind you), I don't have any trouble with women 'fetishizing' gay guys in yaoi porn and M/M fiction (among the other things they make, like art, fanfic, BL manga) which I myself consume and enjoy greatly. So why is it immoral or problematic in itself?
/r/MensRights15/12/24 10:30 AM
-12

What's wrong with commiserating with another man or having a talk about emotions? Why do I need to immediately focus on solutions? For instance- "Your wife is dead. Are you going to wallow in 'self-victimization' and 'self-pity' or are you going to go to therapy, or take drug X or Y, or go to grief counselling, etc.?" Why the false dichotomy? A real man would converse around the emotion and then seek a solution, denying or rejecting someone's emotions just leads to the same emotional retardation…
/r/MensRights01/12/24 03:08 PM
1

They probably can't change whatever needs to be changed. They lack the motivation, conscientiousness, information, peers, etc. You could similarly say "men just want to blame women instead of fixing crime and protecting women (by virtue of their greater strength- I mean, shit, I don't have larger nostrils and big ass hands, joints, and feet for nothing).
/r/MensRights01/12/24 02:43 PM
1

There are cultures and time periods where men could do that and homosexuality was not seen as a mental illness or nonexistent (more rhetoric and cope than truth) to the extent modern Muslim fanatics want it to be. Hell, the pederastya and eunuchs and homosexuality in their own culture, for instance.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 01:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter