TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Suspicious_Form6653 Archive

View 0 posts and 141 comments by Suspicious_Form6653 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm late, but wasn't the 40-80k figures about Australian online CSA? Because I'm pretty sure the 70k figures in the US is about "non-online" CSA, two different things. "But I don't think anyone who cares about data would believe the 1/10 claim" True.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:36 PM
16

Problem is the same reasoning is applied for every sex crimes ever. And the same reasoning exist because of higher sensibility/empathy towards women and girls being victims of sex crimes than towards men and boys. I don't blame OP for being a bit skeptical.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:04 PM
1

Yes, if we assume 0 woman commits CSA and every single case is true and 1 predator for each victim. And I doubt most of the sex predators commit sex crimes every single year for 50 years straight, so the number of predators accumulates over the years.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 12:21 AM
1

You're including women, so no wonder you feel like you do. I should have mentionned that I have included male children who did not yet or never came of age in the 18 000 000 figure, so it's actually a few million less. Just suppose that no men in Australia died or emigrated from 1975 to 2025 and divide the annual number of births by 2 (so that you don't include women), and so without ignoring the annual increase of men because of immigration. You're going to find a close enough figure.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 11:52 PM
4

Problem is your counter-argument is only good when the claim is that 1 out of 10 men commit CSA in a single year. But when the claim is that 1 men out of 10 commit CSA in, let's say, a 50 years timeframe, the same logic does not hold up. If we take 40 000 CSA reports a year, and multiply it by 50 (for 50 years), we get...2 000 000 reported CSA in 50 years. And if you take into account all the men who ever existed in Australia in the same 50 years timeframe (let's say from 1975 to 2025), you get …
/r/MensRights29/07/26 08:02 PM
2

Well, don't you think it's wild to find 1 or 2 false accusations among 5 accusations even under that illegal assumption? I'm aware of that assumption, I think I used "if we assume...." in my comment above for arguments sake. Of course, if the justice system do their job, we could find a lower percentage than 56%.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:38 AM
1

So between 11 and 23% of cases are proven as either true or false (2%+9% and 10%+13%), so between 11 and 23 cases out of 100. 100÷11 = 9,09 and 100÷23 = 4,35. If we assume the trend are the exact same if 100% of the accusations are proven true or false, then we do 2×9,09 for the minimal proportion of accusations being proven false or 9×9,09 for the maximal proportion of accusations being proven true and 10×4,35 for the maximal proportion of accusations being proven false or 13×4,35 for the minim…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:23 PM
1

So between 11 and 23% of cases are proven as either true or false (2%+9% and 10%+13%), so between 11 and 23 cases out of 100. 100÷11 = 9,09 and 100÷23 = 4,35. If we assume the trend are the exact same if 100% of the accusations are proven true or false, then we do 2×9,09 for accusations proven false or 9×9,09 for accusations proven true and 10×4,35 for accusations proven false or 13×4,35 for accusations proven true. 2×9,09 = 18,18, rounded to 18,20 and 9×9,09 = 81,81, rounded to 81,80. 10×4,35 =…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:17 PM
1

Ok. I accept your apology.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:34 PM
1

Ok. Let's see. For the stereotype of unpredictability of male victims of SA, your source shows that women agree more with it than men by almost 10% more. Let's go further. For the stereotype of male victims harmed for life, men agree with it more than women by about 3%. But if you did not stop at the word "stereotype", you would have known that this is the total opposite of calling a victim "lucky". For the stereotype of male victims being somewhat responsible of their own SA, men agree more wit…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 01:43 PM
5

And you ignore the plethora of (feminist) women that use these sex addicts comments as an excuse to minimize or even outright erase men's experiences, to make SA and rape a "women's issue". And not only you're ignoring them, but you use these same excuses yourself.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 03:40 PM
6

Women do not empathise more with men than other men, that just you overidealizing women. What is true is that men empathise with eachother less than women empathise with eachother. Well, if you can even call it "empathising" and not something more superficial.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 02:45 PM
3

Ok, fair enough. Though, "Any other serious reason for which it is difficult to continue the marriage." can be interpreted broadly, and that's where the women-are-wonderful effect can come into play. "Korean legal scholars supporting the fault-based system generally cite the following reasons: Granting a divorce to the party at fault goes against Confucian morality (doei) and may encourage the husband to arbitrarily abandon his wife, as was the practice in the past. Moreover, by forcing a couple…
/r/MensRights27/07/26 02:21 PM
2

If you have to prove the other party did something wrong, then it's not a no-fault divorce anymore. And I'm pretty sure korean and japanese courts can grant you a no-fault divorce if they find it appropriate (especially if they don't escape the women-are-wonderful effect.).
/r/MensRights27/07/26 12:53 PM
12

"For instance, South Korea ruled in 2014 that future pensions and severance pay could be included in the division of assets. That means if a housewife handled all the housework and childcare during their marriage, thus allowing her husband to work, she’s entitled to part of his elderly pension after getting divorced. Japan introduced a similar reform in 2007." That would be understandable if it is the husband initiating the no-fault divorce (though, in SK and Japan, you can't do it without a cou…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 08:40 PM
3

It stands for Singapore.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 09:02 PM
3

When feminists start to "care" about men's wellbeing/dignity, it's always with ulterior motives.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 02:43 PM
29

Because women are not more empathetic, especially not naturally.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 02:27 PM
5

That's why I will never believe that women are more empathetic than men. This empathy gap wouldn't exist if that was true.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 11:33 AM
0

I wonder how many men would marry if they didn't have these biases...
/r/MensRights21/07/26 12:06 PM
2

The mental load of a reddit post???????? "But yes, in that relationship, after financially supporting the family, birthing (and nearly dying after the 3rd kid), joint parenting, caring for his family, taking the mental load of it all," I'm talking about this part that you have written the comment before, keep up ! You know that when you are worried about excessive jealousy and the like, you can address it with whoever you are with instead of resorting to emotional blackmail. In fact, being butth…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 01:27 AM
1

"The question in most cases is not whether the man being called the biological father cheated. So the concern you raise is a tiny percentage compared to guys who legitimately may be biological father but want it confirmed before they take responsibility." Well of course it's a tiny percentage, since the men who know they cheated would rather AVOID a paternity test, which was my point all along.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 12:52 AM
4

You seems to have an issue with paternity test at birth (I mean, you did not even answer my question I asked you in my first reply to you by yes or no, but with another question), so it seems like you don't wait to take the mental load of "it all" before having an issue.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 12:03 AM
1

You know that my main point is that it's nonsense to say that a man wants a paternity test to avoid fatherhood right? That a deadbeat would rather avoid one if anything. You're basically replying to a point I did not make (well, except for the cheating part, but I will respond to it later, after you confirm to me that you finally understood my point) I know that a woman always knows that a child is her, contrary to a man, and men deserve to know for sure if anything.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 08:17 PM
124

So disabled men have to pay a penalty, but not non-disabled women? And it's totally not sex discrimination?
/r/MensRights19/07/26 06:15 PM
3

"he's behind bars. So it's safer than dating normal man" Do they even care about the victims at this point... they are basically saying you should rape and kill in order to be "safe" to date (as long as you're caught).
/r/MensRights19/07/26 05:55 PM
4

Regardless, being so butthurt about paternity testing, especially to the point of threatening divorce over that is a major red flag regardless of sex and regardless of what motives you think the man has. No honest man or woman would have such visceral discomfort with paternity testing.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 02:20 PM
-4

Do you think a man would want a paternity test if it would expose him as a cheater? Most importantly, I guess the "especially if he knows they are his" threw you off, but reading the whole comment would help you tremenduously, especially the "uncomfortable with taking a paternity test" part.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 01:02 PM
0

Read again, I was implying how ridiculous the "he wants a paternity test because he wants to avoid fatherhood" reasoning is. I think a paternity test is the last thing an irresponsible man wants (especially if he's a cheater!).
/r/MensRights19/07/26 12:43 PM
12

Well yes we are talking about prenuptial arrangment and the sort. I guess doing 3 STI tests a month is good if you care about sexual health, but I wonder if it's equivalent to a few paternity tests throughout a potentially lifetime long relationship, tests which can also give interesting medical informations beside who the father is btw. And I don't think a few paternity tests a life is equivalent to daily/weekly/monthly or even yearly surveillance. Your question is basically "Would she get comp…
/r/MensRights19/07/26 12:48 AM
12

What if your now ex-husband told you that he would want a paternity test for each child right at birth before you even lived together? Would you still expect 100% blind trust from him even if he told you beforehand?
/r/MensRights18/07/26 11:44 PM
-19

Wouldn't a man who doesn't want to take care of his kids be uncomfortable with taking a paternity test ... especially if he knows they are his?
/r/MensRights18/07/26 09:42 PM
7

Women are completely able to empathize with men on this issue...when they do not think about cheating and child support.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 09:18 PM
9

"Contempt for the opposite sex, received wisdom dictates, is mostly a male problem." "So the results of a recent survey carried out in collaboration with the British publication the New Statesman come as a surprise. It found that 72pc of men hold a positive view of women. In contrast, only 35pc of Gen Z women have a positive view of men." So, it turns out that contempt for the opposite sex is mostly a female problem, but they still refuse to admit it honestly.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 05:32 PM
8

Who knows. Speaking of which, I wonder what's the correlation between adherence to feminism and sex crimes, child abuse/murder, domestic abuse, etc...
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:46 PM
1

Men outnumbering women by hundreds of millions is a wild exagerration. Men outnumbers women by a few tens of millions in China, not hundreds.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:58 AM
8

That makes me think about when I responded to someone under another post that women aren't more selfless than men, and they basically replied "Yes, they are. Because they were/are expected/forced to".
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:51 AM
3

Likely because of how family courts deal with child custody (mothers being more likely to be favored even when they are bad compared to fathers). And I would consider widowed mothers to be a completely different category from divorced mothers.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:24 AM
4

Western European women aren't significantly better than the Americans. You have the same bias for Western Europe that the passport bros have for Eastern Europe or Southeast Asia.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 05:34 PM
16

It wouldn't have happened if feminists were right about women not being believed. I wonder how many men killed themselves as a result of a (false) rape allegation against them...
/r/MensRights13/07/26 11:06 PM
3

I'm curious, where did you learn that nazi Germany sent 12 year old boys to the meat grinder ? I want to know.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 08:34 PM
13

This article dates back from January 2024, meaning that her sentence ended months ago (if I'm not mistaken). I wonder if judges get legal consequences for doing an awful job...
/r/MensRights13/07/26 08:22 PM
10

Likewise, you could ask how many of women's suicide attempts are attempts to emotionnaly blackmail and/or socially destroy someone since the numbers says they do it more while "succeeding" less in absolute numbers.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:09 PM
28

UN is more likely to promote worldwide starvation than to care about the male sex. ......
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:54 AM
4

"It's not women's fault", you know, feminists themselves seems to have trouble considering non-feminist women as women. "I'm a woman, therefore I'm a feminist" is a common logic among them, so it seems logic to consider "feminists fault" as "women's fault", so all the more tempting.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:34 AM
2

It makes it so ironic to insult non-feminists of being fascists and nazis.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 06:27 PM
5

A little bit of the same for me, not because of friends, but the movement's diregard for due process and innocence, or rather, the movement's sexist disregard for due process and innocence.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 12:42 PM
8

If the caregiver role is "forced" onto women as you say, wouldn't that prove me right that women aren't, at least naturally, more caring than men? Or maybe it's the female feminists who think that being a caregiver is oppression that are significantly less caring (and more selfish) than the average man... Or are we ignoring that father works more hours (and harder jobs) so that the mother can breastfeed her kids in peace, and, as a result, we consider only the mother as "caring"? Is your definit…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 12:12 AM
17

"Feminists who actively support men in dealing with their masculine problems" How many of these feminists do you think exist? Seems more like a contradiction. Also, you should have added "People who claim not being feminists, but are actually feminists in practice.".
/r/MensRights29/06/26 04:39 PM
14

"Women are more likely than men to prioritize others and ignore their own needs and wants." That's a blatant lie, the sort of lie that makes bad experiences with women more difficult to cope with, and hence tempt men more easily into misogyny. If you don't want men to be misogynists, stop spreading misinformations.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 04:25 PM
1

So you think he's exaggerating because he has daddy issues, right? Tbf, it seems like he has both daddy and mommy issues (absent father + neglectful mother), and issues with his sister. You could have said that the men in his life (the absent father and the sister's boyfriend) aren't really better so his men-only utopia does not make sense, instead of insinuating that "Well, your mom may have failed you and ignored the abuse from your sister and her boyfriend, but she's actually a good parent, s…
/r/MensRights27/06/26 10:36 PM
1

Letting her daughter (and her daughters boyfriend) abuse her autistic brother allegedly for years is a massive mistake, not "some" mistake, and it could even get CPS involved (and it's not a good idea to assume they will care about the good things she did to her autistic son) "It's hard to raise kids" is not an excuse. "Father left" is not an excuse. Tbf, you seem to come from the perspective that he's exaggerating what he said he went through. If that's the case, you should have said it sooner.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:39 PM
2

A mother that lets her daughter abuse her son is hardly caring. If the mom was actually loving, he would very likely not come up with this post in the first place. Telling him to not be bitter to the extreme is a thing, overvictimizing a negligent mother is another.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 06:21 PM
52

One more proof that misandry is institutional, even at world level institutions.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 05:38 PM
19

It's not even a "women and girls most affected" moment but a "only women and girls affected" moment.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 12:08 PM
5

You should take a look at the suicide rate among divorced men and do some math (married men and divorced men taken together compared to men who never married) and you will find that men who never married have lower suicide rate compared to the married-divorced group. Do the same for women and you'll tell me if you find any significant difference between the married-divorced group and the never married group (apparently, there is almost no difference). Not that women are worth nothing, but their …
/r/MensRights24/06/26 07:17 PM
32

Not to mention that men who never marry are less likely to end their life than men who marry at least once in their life. It's as if marriage is only beneficial when we love each other, and not just for having a feminine presence near us.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 05:34 PM
47

Very likely both. And women who are feminists tend to project it onto men as a general truth about men.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 02:16 AM
6

It can (often?) be psychological projection.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 02:13 AM
16

When you have both an extensive definition for misogyny and a restrictive definition for (and a tendancy to ignore) misandry, that's exactly the conclusion you'd come to.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 04:38 PM
23

Except it's the misogynists that get shut down real quick, whereas the misandrists are applauded or tolerated.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 03:43 PM
32

For starters, to know what a man is supposed to be, you must be able to empathize with men as a sex, which is, I'm afraid, a rare/exceptionnal quality among women (especially nowadays).
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:02 PM
7

I mean to be saying that this movement lies about not being about paying back men in a way they feel is deserved.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 11:09 PM
68

And feminists are telling us their movement is not about retribution.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 02:13 PM
15

And without open urinals.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 12:17 PM
9

It's as if societies tend to give more power to women when they start getting too comfortable.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 11:57 PM
3

So two male roomates/friends who live together are considered a gay couple after a certain amount of time? Where did you learn that if you mind me asking?
/r/MensRights19/06/26 10:59 PM
-6

"Having children later in life is expensive, medically risky for both the woman and the child—why should a man have to shoulder all that extra risk?" Misandrists have trouble with this fact for some reasons.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 08:39 AM
2

There are women who complained that their boyfriend stole their "childbearing" years. This hypothetical outcry is not as absurd as you're trying to claim.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 11:27 AM
22

Let's be honest, this law is based on the premise that women are so traumatized by the "rape culture" they can't say no and only freeze out of fear and can never be seduced (or that seduction is rape in itself). Women are traumatized, so they are mentaly impaired, so they can't be responsible for their own actions basically. It makes the line between "woman" and "minor" so thin regarding sex that they're almost indistinguishable.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:00 PM
1

The URL is clean now.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 01:08 AM
2

Men letting themselves be zombified by this "women are wondeful" mind virus do not help either.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 12:53 AM
2

You mean this ??? https://youtu.be/0b18xk2zMgA
/r/MensRights17/06/26 12:41 AM
3

Firstly, that's assuming she's speaking in good faith, and that the guilt she felt and her giving in are related to her husband guilt-tripping her (which the reader is left to assume). Secondly, she definitely knew she was going to have sex with other men (if you read the article, it is explicitly implied that the husband told her he wanted her to have sex with other men), the fact that she expected them to be accompanied with their wives does not change the fact that she knew what she was engag…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 08:06 PM
1

I don't understand what you are talking about, can you explain please?
/r/MensRights16/06/26 06:09 PM
7

The key difference here is the elderly people you are speaking about did not know they were being scammed, they only know after the fact. On the other hand, the woman in the article knew what she was doing, what she was engaging into (you ignored the part where she says she arranged meetings herself), and oddly enough, she's vague about how her at the time husband coerced her. She looks more like a woman ashamed of herself for taking a serie of decisions, not only against her conscience, but tha…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 05:19 PM
10

Being in a vulnerable state isn't a pass, it just mean that you're vulnerable, not that you're helpless.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 03:30 PM
3

One occurrence of boys complaining about it. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0b18xk2zMgA
/r/MensRights15/06/26 10:36 PM
9

You know, since I was a kid, I always had the instinct of making sure no unwelcomed female gaze could watch me, and that is why, when I go to the toilets, I avoid urinals (I used urinals probably 1 or 2 times in my entire life) and always go to the stalls instead. And the female cleaners and the women who can't be bothered to wait for their turn to go to their toilet usually prove me it is a good instinct.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 10:24 PM
1

Feminists shut down forum for battered husbands 1. https://web.archive.org/web/20170507070117/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM
/r/MensRights15/06/26 11:42 AM
-8

Then the person should have given the link to the wayback machine instead.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 11:08 AM
2

The second youtube video is unavailable.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 04:20 AM
19

"Salazar stressed that, in his view, “the law is not intended to go against women, but rather to punish a specific conduct that affects the family.”". As if women cheated so often that this disclaimer was needed.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:51 PM
7

Actually adress what he says instead of accusing him of generalizing feminists all for defending indefensible hatred and generalizing men yourself.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:29 AM
9

This person as you say is constantly arguing that "but women weak, so women most affected" "but women almost never do it, something something..." which is completely inappropriate (on top of being completely wrong) since it seems like their main objective is to downplay, minimize the incident. This person is more passionnate about defending women's victimhood than about having sympathy for the male rape victim.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:08 AM
6

I think we should name the "no true scotman fallacy" as the "no true feminist fallacy" alongside.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 12:26 AM
12

"Male loneliness epidemic is about loneliness, not about lack of romantics relationships with women." Exactly. That's what too many people do not understand.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 11:40 PM
5

I wonder what the statistics look like.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 10:28 PM
25

Misogynists are also less hostile to little girls than misandrists are to little boys, but that depend who you call a misogynist. But I don't remember having read a single comment about hurting little girls because of their sex from men who are bitter about women, or heard anything similar from them.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 10:00 PM
26

If you know someone who like this abomination, call them out and be careful. Don't tolerate their humor.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 09:55 PM
1

No. I was just raising questions just like SidewaysGiraffe.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 07:50 PM
1

To be fair, this same paper you posted also tells us that back in 1984 it was the opposite, gender-swapped compared to 2019, that women were the empathetic ones, and that men were the ones who shamed male victims the most 40 years ago.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 12:26 PM
32

Not surprised at all, (female) feminists often instrumentalize male on male SA to minimize female on male SA.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 08:22 PM
3

Ah I see now. Austria really is a marital cesspool.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:13 PM
8

Receiving dad's retirement money upon his death does not make any sense, especially when they start complaining about "low fertility rates".
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:46 PM
2

Isn't it the legal standard for divorced persons to be ineligible for widow's pension regardless of needing alimony or not (why would a divorced woman be treated as a widow?), or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:35 PM
54

As long as women are under-punished for their crimes, it's always reasonable to assume crimes perpetraded by women are underreported in official statistics.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:58 PM
9

There's no justifiable explanation for that.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:53 PM
8

"Women are in fact penalised if they don't ask for alimony." Ok, that one takes the cake (because I do not know or remember of a similar thing in any other country). If you mind me asking, what's the penalty?
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:30 PM
7

Can you explain why Austria in particular please ?
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:11 AM
11

The so-called "reward for motherhood" should be called "reward for single motherhood" instead, and I have the impression that too many take this approach when it comes to solve the "worryingly low fertility rates", as if financial reward was not tried before. Even here in Belgium, where you get an extra revenue every month for having a child until he is 25 of age (if he still lives with you by then) (and the more you have (until a certain number), the more money you get), the fertility rate is s…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:03 AM
1

Yes, we tolerate women's sex crimes way too much.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 09:39 PM
9

I genuinely believe that many of these cases can be attributed to feminist brainwashing. When you get constantly told that rape is a male (implying inherently masculine) sexual action, and you are attracted to the masculine, then rape can start looking desirable to you, like something to look for in a masculine man.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 12:53 PM
10

Sexism against the opposite sex is vastly more prevalent in women than in men nowaday (at least). And the pyramid, as highlighted, is itself sexist with "sexists comments" and, thereby, enables the very thing it claimed to call out.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 04:49 AM
2

And the results of all these reasons is a higher suicide rate for men who maried at least once in their life than for men who never maried. We like to talk about how beneficial mariage is, but that's always assuming no divorce mess, and divorce can't happen without mariage by definition. That being said, I don't think it significantly lowers the birth rate. As long as men simp for women at least.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 08:31 PM
1

I would not care about women going into the same rest-rooms as me if there were stalls only.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 07:48 PM
3

I once heard the excuse that women don't hold their pee as well as men do.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 09:21 AM
9

Divorce makes mariage a mental hazard.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 10:40 AM
7

Because childbirth does not make you the superior parent.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 03:19 AM
1

That's assuming WW1 was worth it.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:00 AM
1

Where did you learn that? Genuine question.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 11:55 PM
2

French : "Ne décalottez pas le prépuce de ce bébé. Ne circoncisez pas ce bébé." or "Ne pas décalotter le prépuce de ce bébé. Ne pas circoncire ce bébé."
/r/MensRights30/05/26 07:49 AM
24

NOW is still making women the victims of the story, so it's clearly not because they care about men.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 07:26 PM
15

And what about female bullies? You think the "stigma of not being able to spend time with their friends after school" is enough? No way.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 11:14 AM
1

And these are the men you should never confide in without being prepared if you get SA'd. If they don't care about their own dignity/privacy, they will hardly care about yours.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 03:29 PM
2

I wonder if these women (who have these painful periods) ever had any "mild heart attacks" anytime in their life. And, the women claiming their periods are as painful as a heart attack usually do not specify the severity of said heart attack, which really does not help, because most people, I think, are going to assume she's talking about the severes ones, which can easily sound extreme, to the point of ridicule.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 03:11 PM
3

They think we live in a "rape culture" so it is fine to make false accusations. That's the feminists logic.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 05:12 AM
7

When they say that, ask them if a 12 year old boy is more fit for positions of authority than adult women..
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:06 PM
29

You know, I genuinely think feminism supports rape, SA, domestic violence, child (sexual) abuse, child murder, etc etc... as long as it's commited by a woman. Their morale can't exist without the "patriarchy", so the "patriarchy" will never be smashed.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 11:40 AM
9

"Weakness makes right". And what is "institutional power" anyway.... Is it being favored in the law....Is it simply having more authority or something?...
/r/MensRights26/05/26 11:27 AM
3

When they do something "for men", it's always with ulterior motives.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 10:30 AM
99

I'm 25, and I have never approached a girl in my entire life and I don't think I will anytime soon. No kiss, no sex, nothing.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 07:37 PM
3

"(of the 11 metrics to measure psychological harm from rape, the average female rape victim suffers a combination of between 2-3 of them. The average male forced to penetrate suffers 3-5 on average)." Learned something new today. Is it still coming from the CDC, or is it coming from somewhere else?
/r/MensRights22/05/26 07:23 PM
12

I wonder what the actual crime rate (talking about crimes perpetrated by women and girls) is in this country.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:48 PM
40

As for me, what woke me up about feminism is how willing feminists are to lie and throw innocent men in prison for crimes they never commited. Feminism is trash. The sooner it disappears, the better.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 10:31 AM
2

They don't have knowledge of genetics either.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 07:54 AM
30

It's the proof that feminists do not see women as "strong", we could even argue they see them as weaker than little boys.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 10:31 PM
4

I don't mind women going the 4b route, but how many of them actually live in peace ?
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:56 PM
97

It's the "Women and children first" trope.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 11:48 AM
0

Personally, I never pee at the urinals, these are useless honestly.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 10:26 PM
8

Pleading guilty is not having regrets. The judicial system should know its responsibilities before forgiving lightly.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 04:13 AM
16

Mmh, excuse me, on the first paragraph, did you mean "when fewer women went to college.." ?
/r/MensRights20/05/26 12:45 AM
7

Unfortunately, I'm not suprised. To be frank, I think there's no point, as a reporter, in going into locker rooms, much less in the opposite sex's locker rooms. It gives off voyeur vibes.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 12:12 AM
10

If I'm not mistaken, the Russian Empire was also lenient toward women who murdered their newborn child/infant. Just to say this obscene leniency toward women is far from new.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 07:16 PM
7

I looked at the Ludtke v. Kuhn case in Wikipedia, and I'm left wondering if male sports reporters were (really) allowed in women's locker rooms. In other words, does the rationale of the ruling even make a minimal amount of "sense" ? Was it really about "equality" ?
/r/MensRights19/05/26 06:54 PM
1

Who's that author?
/r/MensRights18/05/26 10:26 PM
1

I don't think you should censor the word "rape".
/r/MensRights13/05/26 12:13 PM
8

Had a similar experience, except the doctor was male (and, as I remember, a little nicer), and I suspect it made it harder for me to be able to take care of my own privates beyond the most superficial. Honestly, I think doctors, or anyone, should stop forcing little kids foreskin all the way down (I assume that's what you're talking about) for whatever check-up when we already know said kid can pee fine. And I don't live in the US btw.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:10 AM
45

Gotta call this country Simpgapore at this point.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 11:51 AM
2

The woman who has arrested in 2018 was definitely caught quickly.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 02:49 AM
8

Is this decision even legal? 30 days is so suspiciously lenient.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 01:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter