TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Svenskhockeyspelare Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by Svenskhockeyspelare on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm simply speaking from past experience. I did not mean to imply that everyone shared such views.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:34 AM
1

Whats wrong with you people? She is distinctly human. She's just different. I could actually imagine her being on the 'spectrum'. The fact that she doesn't understand appropriate or inappropriate socializing points to that, as does her messed up face. From a thread posted yesterday.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:55 AM
1

Hahaha someone missed their bedtime. Since you're apparently older than dirt itself, enjoy your fucking retirement home, and hurry up and die off. I hate the whole triggered joke as much as anyone else, and think identity politics is a fucking joke. And to answer the question at hand, I'm not entirely sure the courts have taken a similar case, so I'd be eager to see it play out.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:53 AM
1

I'm not trolling. If anyone is trolling it's you, because of your inability to grasp the most basic axioms of logic. And seeing how your comment history includes insulting those on the spectrum, fuck you.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:50 AM
1

You're just going to continue this ad nauseam, aren't you?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:48 AM
1

That's opening up another can of worms completely. On a positive basis no, but that's just down to the limits of human biology. Normatively, no, but for different reasons. However, men should, in my opinion, be able to have a say in decisions on abortion and related matters, particularly within the confines of a relationship.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:39 AM
1

That's going to be down to semantics and interpretation of the bill's exact wording.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:14 AM
1

Read the last sentence of the post text. If that is indeed what the law proscribes, it discriminates on the basis of sex and would violate the Equal Protection Clause, and the Fourteenth Amendment, which incorporates federal Constitutional protections into state law.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:10 AM
1

I thought that followed from the post itself a posteriori.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:06 AM
2

Ok then. Well let me clear that up now. Congress cannot make a law that is discriminatory against a protected class, or element thereof. Since sex is a protected class, a law cannot discriminate on said basis.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:00 AM
2

I stated what part of the document would be violated. How does this prove nothing?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:42 AM
2

Equal protection clause. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:13 AM
3

I'm pretty sure that isn't a law, and if it did become law, it would be unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:56 AM
7

Man. I know this irrelevant, but it's neat seeing footage of Grand Forks after not having been there since taking an official visit to UND in 2010.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 05:38 AM
1

If the genders are reversed and it becomes shitty...the opinion was shitty in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:47 PM
1

Holy fuck...🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights04/08/17 08:37 PM
6

Feminists bitch about double standards. Hello...is this not a fucking example of them?! But oh wait, I forgot. It only works when things are in their favour.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:44 PM
1

With all the shit going on in the world I can't say I blame you.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:26 PM
1

Nothing about the stuff in plastic bottles surprises me anymore, sadly. The addiction to petroleum will catch up one day, and the hell to pay that there will be is inconceivable. I'm personally shocked that no international treaties to the end of eliminating their commonplace usage have been agreed. And my answer was more of a joke, to be honest.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:54 PM
1

I figured part of it was because sperm had become useless as a result of feminists forgetting evolutionary biology and thinking (not ironically, perhaps) that sex itself was sexist.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:50 PM
6

-_-. Humanity's fucked. No wonder the BBC published a piece yesterday stating that sperm counts falling could eventually lead to human extinction.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:27 PM
4

Holy shit. Peak stupidity has been reached.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:58 PM
3

Hell with overbooking. It's a fuckin scam.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 04:12 PM
3

I'm going to see it tonight Edit: Go see it everyone. Masterpiece of a film.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:52 PM
35

Yup
/r/MensRights12/07/17 01:49 AM
675

Hooray double standards!
/r/MensRights12/07/17 01:27 AM
15

Uh...no.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:26 PM
9

Looking at your post history, you should probably fuck off.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:53 PM
7

Uhhh...wow. I just got cancer.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 04:11 AM
2

Vad fan är detta skit?!?! Men jag skulle ha förvantat det, eftersom regeringen är gjord av feminister...
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:54 PM
4

Merci and thank you
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:45 PM
29

Gotta love logical inconsistency, eh?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:56 PM
21

Stupidity. Stupidity's her problem, but the thing is...it's in her mirror. What a fucktard.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:28 AM
1

Sad, but true
/r/MensRights28/06/17 02:21 PM
5

I hope so
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:43 AM
2

My thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 08:41 AM
3

In denial about what feminism really is: Hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 08:40 AM
1

Do I want eye cancer? 🤔🤔🤔
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:32 PM
19

This is just fucked up. Clearly doesn't encourage violence against males.../s.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:04 PM
18

But that would ruin feminist ideas. We can't have that. /s
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:08 PM
2

?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:30 AM
72

I'd expect nothing less from that cesspool of "journalism".
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:00 PM
19

Being selected for secondary screening at airports every fucking time.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:21 AM
6

Yup
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:13 AM
10

Yup
/r/MensRights18/06/17 12:57 AM
12

Wow...I don't think there's anything left to say
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:58 PM
60

This isn't sexist at all. Nope. Nothing to see here, everyone. Move along. /s
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:45 PM
2

Yup. I hate having to explain this over and over again. Like...didn't it sink in after the twentieth fucking time?!
/r/MensRights11/06/17 08:24 PM
3

Of course ignoring variables like job title, role, seniority, and quality of work among others. But that's just a small inconvenience, is it not?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:46 PM
5

Math major. Can confirm
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:44 PM
3

I agree with this x1000. If only there were some way to get around the shitty underhandedness of politics and the unwillingness of parties to countenance opposition to their positions, even when its merited and supported by evidence...
/r/MensRights08/06/17 06:24 PM
3

City dweller in TX here. That's basically everyone in the state falling prey to the hick stereotype.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:49 AM
5

Agreed
/r/MensRights06/06/17 08:30 PM
4

But I thought that male privilege was supposed to protect him. Oh wait. That's right. It doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:21 AM
1

There's a different definition of rape. Apples to oranges.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:18 PM
1

Swedish-American here. Feminist govt aside, we're doing just fine.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:53 PM
1

I guess the best way I can explain this is by analogy. Terrorist groups in the Middle East are something associated with almost everyone from that region. Though they wish to spread their religion and find individuals who agree with them, they recognise the inherent problem in allowing freedom of operation for those who may damage their cause (e.g. ISIS or al-Qaeda). Similarly, the Men's Right's movement must not sit by and ignore the potential risks caused by a scenario involving guilt by assoc…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:22 AM
1

From what I've seen that isn't the case, but I've not seen a lot of things, so I guess I can't say you're wrong.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:43 AM

Thank you! Someone finally gets it. If we expect feminists to out and disown their whackjobs, we should get our own house in order, that we might maintain the moral high ground.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:43 AM
4

I hear you. Though I abhor the current dipshit in chief.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:46 AM
5

They're doing this in Austin, but it's actually illegal here. It's a violation of a local ordinance. Can't wait to see the fallout.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:20 PM
15

If someone said girls will be girls no one would bat a fucking eye.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:46 PM
16

It's bullshit. Fuck this stupid theatre.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:16 PM
5

Thing is, that toxic environment was created by design. That shit is actually intentionally sexist.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:49 PM
1

No. Not at all. You see, men are just an evolutionary anomaly, a species not meant to ever exist. /s. Fuck this discriminatory bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:47 PM
1

Good point. I was just thinking that if this law were enacted in the States, it wouldn't survive a challenge in court.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:29 AM
11

I have nothing to say to this. I mean how can one respond, other than that this violates the idea of presumed innocence?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:21 AM
2

On point
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:57 AM
20

Seems like this was more a political than gender thing, imo.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 01:51 PM
1

Yup. Pretty much. Some feminist cunt posted on this sub yesterday and apparently failed to grasp this.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 01:45 AM
3

Damn it. The feminist trolls have infiltrated this sub. You've already been downvoted apparently.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 07:17 PM
1

Seconded
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:54 PM
3

You should see one of the recent posts on this sub. It's so fucking stupid it violates Poe's Law. But yeah, I completely agree with you.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:45 PM
4

This is what they meant by shitpost, I guess. Didn't think feminists could be so stupid. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:44 PM
7

OP is a feminist. Move on, don't engage this fuckwit.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter