TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SweetDegeneracy Archive

View 1 post and 54 comments by SweetDegeneracy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Marriage/ChildrenSweetDegeneracy/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:04 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I don't think everyone should be able to vote. My position is not based on that, so your statement doesn't really mean anything to me. Property ownership is not limited to land or building ownership. It also includes intellectual property, a mechanism through which businesses are owned. We could talk more about it, but you're rude, so I'll pass.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 09:32 PM
-1

Voting should be based on property ownership, not a draft, in my opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 06:30 PM
1

I think that the value of women has been overestimated more than I think the value of men has gone down.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 03:23 PM
1

Technically they aren't supposed to get a refund on their kids if they werent working, but they get around it. They have "friends" claim them and their kids as dependents and get the cash from them. Little do their friends know, they are gonna have the IRS knocking on their door a couple of years later looking for the money. Oh, and when you tell them it's fraud, they say you're harassing them.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/19 02:56 AM
9

They use the money they know they're getting (legally enforced child support) to get their hair done. Then they gotta use the kids as emotional leverage against someone who isn't legally obligated to give them money. And if you dont do it, well then you're cheap and mean to children. That's how they operate.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/19 06:51 PM
0

The specific details of those studies are important. Can you provide more detail? A study which only indicates a higher rate of success for taller versus shorter males doesn't indicate anything with respect to their financial status. You would need to study the successes of men under both contexts to determine which is a stronger indicator of success.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 06:09 PM
8

"The wife of a man in a leadership position takes a pay cut when the man loses that position." Meanwhile... "muh wage gap." Zero self awareness.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 04:29 PM
0

Appearance is not as relevant to women as financial status.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 04:08 PM
1

I agree it needs to be better defined.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 05:32 PM
1

No one knows what an "unfit" parent is. That's part of the problem men face. Men are "unfit" if the mother doesn't like the color of their blue shirt. (Hyperbolic, but you understand my point and my use of the term "demonstrably egregious.")
/r/MensRights05/09/19 05:22 PM
1

Morality is not subjective. We will just have to disagree. That is an entire discussion on its own. Still, it was a strawman. You didn't just claim it was a solution. You claimed it was MY solution, which is false. That's a misrepresentation of my argument, a terrible one at that, which makes it a strawman.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 05:18 PM
0

This.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 01:11 PM
1

Agree. 100%
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:04 PM
1

If I'm working and you are not, one month.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:03 PM
1

If you're going to take the time to change the law, you might as well do it to hold women accountable. Men and women should do their best to parent the children they produce. If they find that they have irreconcilable differences, then both are required to take responsibility. 50/50 custody should be the default ruling. In that case, each parent is responsible for the care of the child during their time with the child. No one should get money. That is fair. Only in cases where the behavior of on…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 04:35 PM
1

Strawman: "an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument." I made absolutely no arguments in favor of any solution prior to YOUR comment on killing children. I made statements regarding the morality of certain behaviors. You presented the worst possible solution because it is easier to believe I'm an asshole rather than present your own explanation on why men abandoning their children is moral. I presented you with a fa…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 04:24 PM
1

My concern is taxes. Can I pay fewer taxes if I opt out?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 04:09 PM
0

The solution is for people to understand that their actions have consequences. Some things are out of our control, but for things within our control, it is vitally important that we (both women and men) are generally making good decisions. The lack of agency among women is a conscious decision, and a huge problem. It's biggest proponent is feminism. We do not need men to go down the same path.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:06 PM
0

Nice strawman.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:55 PM
1

What if you don't want any benefits at all?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:54 PM
-2

It doesnt force men into anything. If they don't want children, they don't have to have any. I don't really care if I'm downvoted. It's hard for people to accept responsibility and they certainly don't like being told that they need to. I get downvoted when I tell women the same. Morality is not an opinion. It is not subjective. There is an objective reality from which you can draw moral conclusions. Objective reality: fatherless children are more likely to be poor, abuse drugs, drop out of scho…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:44 PM
-13

Sorry, but the moral thing is for men to care for their children. Your solution advocates for less responsibility. What we actually need is more responsibility, primarily from women. We cannot have fatherless children running around. Eventually they become adults with very bad habits. The result is bad for everyone. If you were not raped, you were not forced into fatherhood. Sex is for reproduction, primarily. Biology dictates that. The ability to consent to sex depends on the ability to underst…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 04:08 AM
6

The Democrat party will never allow him to win and redistribution of wealth is unethical regardless of skills or lack thereof. Sorry.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:49 AM
1

Time.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:29 AM
6

What if you opt out?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:28 AM
1

It says the video was posted on father's day. Is there an update anywhere? Maybe she didn't go through with it.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 04:25 PM
1

Vagene
/r/MensRights27/08/19 04:54 PM
2

This places restrictions on family friendly and teen content. Those complaining are grown women wanting their tits shown to young boys with access to their parents debit cards. They are shameful manipulators and child abusers.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/19 04:42 PM
1

Curious what she said to his gf.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/19 04:36 PM
2

Someone do it for a feminist and one of their imagined problems.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 10:03 PM
0

Regardless of who is wrong or right, people downvote opinions they don't like. That's simply a fact.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 05:36 PM
1

I didn't say anyone's opinion was stupid and I didn't say anyone couldn't downvote. I said that people are dumb to just downvote because they disagree and avoid discussion. And they are. Literally by definition. Google it.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:25 PM
-2

It's definitely censorship, and it can be annoying, but you can't go through Reddit believing everyone that downvotes you hates you. People are dumb, and they downvote opinions they don't like. It happens on basically every subreddit. Edit: People don't know what the word "dumb" means. Google it. It literally means an absence of or inability to have discussion, which makes my statement absolutely correct, by definition. People naturally conflate that with stupidity because you cant really learn …
/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:06 PM
8

You dont have any way of knowing if you could be better. Science has been a pretty good indicator in the past.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:04 PM
10

Equating downvotes to hate must mean a pretty sad experience. Maybe Reddit isn't for you.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 12:37 PM
6

It has been shown that infants are significantly affected by the sudden flow of cortisol to the brain when they undergo circumcision. It affects brain development, if I remember correctly. Are you sure you weren't negatively affected?
/r/MensRights21/08/19 12:30 PM
1

No. They aren't.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:24 PM
9

Informally... As an infant, a stress response that severe has developmental consequences. Nurses/Doctors fuck up and the result is anything from death to skin so tight that the penis cannot exit the body properly. Nerve endings are removed, resulting in less enjoyable sex, sometimes pain from erections, sometimes numbness, sometimes erectile dysfunction. All for the sake of... a pretty penis? Worth? Not really. You can find more formal information on all this online if you want.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 04:39 PM
1

"In the garment of faux feminism." They were real proud of that one for the rest of the day.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 08:16 PM
9

Why do people really feel the need to strongly maintain that circumcision is a reasonable practice? Serious question.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 08:54 PM
1

You can, and you should. So should everyone else. Women aren't as delicate as they would conveniently have you believe.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 06:37 AM
4

This should be on the front page.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 11:58 PM
9

They need to be held responsible. They CAN be held responsible. The problem is no one's doing it.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 10:56 PM
3

It's a thing because directly raising a family necessitates a loss in earning potential. Definitely don't marry if you have no interest in having children. If you do, then your ability to earn is important to someone who (to some degree) will lose theirs. Obviously many women are blinded by instinct and run wild with hypergamy and it fucks them and others over in the long run. But if you and your partner know what it is, it's much more manageable.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:35 AM
6

Nobody: Not my father: Not a single guy I've ever met: Certainly not any females with 'internalized misogyny': Feminists: Everyone EVERYWHERE says you can't get a job and even if you do it BETTER NOT be in STEM and you damn sure ain't gonna get paid for your work. Even if you do, the all-male 1% is gonna steal it all.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:07 AM
1

I would go to the police for the last comment if I were you.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 02:17 AM
1

Even if they are telling the truth, all I'm reading is, "we had to work for it and we didn't really want to do that."
/r/MensRights25/04/19 06:53 PM
2

How can you sue someone who isn't accountable for their actions?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:09 AM
2

She's gonna have a lot of days when her kids are in prison. Just saying.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 03:21 PM
12

Decoded: "I sleep with married men to gain control over their resources. It never works because men are evil and hate innocent women like me."
/r/MensRights31/03/19 06:15 AM
1

Not yet. We aren't there yet. My mother is helping him shop around for a lawyer.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:25 PM
2

I believe the plan is to get a lawyer soon. Maybe going through the court process will wake him up.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:23 PM
1

The absolutely insane thing to me is that his twin and he are back and forth about each of their exes terrible behavior but neither can admit it of their own ex. His twin didn't have any kids yet, fortunately.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:00 AM
2

The women see it too. Edit: And we aren't at all impressed with his attempt to save us from misogyny. 90% of us are here because we know the women you're all talking about...
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter