TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SweetElectrical934 Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by SweetElectrical934 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Literally false. “Women and children first”. Why? Reproductive value, as well as sexual selection. If that's what you consider valuable, then we have nothing in common when it comes to men's rights. And by the way, production/possession of gametes is not a virtue, so why do you worship it? That’s the foundation of value. That’s THE fundamental determinant between whether men’s 4x suicide rate, 9x work death rate, 10x prison population rate, increased sentencing, higher crime victimization and pe…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/26 07:40 PM
0

⁠Women don't have inherent value either. Literally false. “Women and children first”. Why? Reproductive value, as well as sexual selection. Egg >>>>> sperm. Every girl born has some value. Average Men? 0 value unless they’re born in an agrarian or manual labor society - which is out the window in the modern age. Women aren’t interested in average (and certainly not below-average) men in the modern age. Men aren’t either. In fact, women view average men as threats, and possible rapists/loose ends…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/26 04:19 PM
13

My other favorite misandrist talking point that is so obviously wrong is the “women are disadvantaged and underrepresented in medical studies!” Yes girl, the male gender which experiences 9/10 workplace deaths, 99/100 combat deaths, has a lower insurance participation rate, a far higher homeless rate, and near 0 organizations specifically working for their advocacy… is advantaged over the gender prized for their ability to give birth. If men are ever represented more than women in medical studie…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 05:25 PM
13

I’d rather have a girl too. Don’t wanna raise a child that’s automatically branded a “walking rapist” before he has his first breath. That has a 4x and climbing suicide rate. That has a high chance of being an incel and an outcast from what society has to offer. Has no inherent value outside of labor he provides, but even that’s being devalued by modern society and DEI.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 12:29 PM
11

Indoctrination. They’re all so casually convinced, and there’s nobody, no organization to speak on behalf of men.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/03/26 06:25 PM
18

No, I said they have a good track record. I wasn’t being sarcastic about that. They have moral superiority. Society cares about women.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/26 05:55 AM
29

They aren’t afraid, but claiming so gives them membership into the “sisterhood”. You can’t simply be a normie woman and get membership, you must be a victim of male violence. The feminist/femcel sisterhood is actually cool and morally right, you see. They’re an in-group here to liberate all women, destroy male violence, and establish peace on earth. They’ve got a righteous track record of liberating women, like giving them the right to vote.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/26 04:19 AM
5

Or even more succinctly, moderates are normies and radfems are pro. Radfems want to skip the steps and push ahead. Because their anger is greater, and they’re willing to go to greater ends that are justified by the means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/26 05:51 PM
2

Sorry, yes, that’s what I meant. Men are the oppressors, yet “incompetent” at it. Nearly every quality of life statistic disfavors them. Schroedinger’s oppressor
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/26 09:57 PM
16

You don’t get an epstein class without a mountain’s worth of women finding Epstein, wealth, and lifestyle like his to be attractive and worth selling their soul for.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 08:34 PM
24

Men are monstrous and in charge, but utterly incompetent at abusing women it seems. All the people that die early in almost every variety of way and by volume are men. You’d think oppressors would do a better job. Men hate women so much even their universal maxim is “women and children first, men last”
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 08:30 PM
18

They expect men to go out and shoot Epstein billionaires. Last time somebody gave a helping hand for Charlie Kirk, they ended up with just 50 signatures on Change.Org for clemency, while Luigi and Wade Wilson are doing 50k. By all means, women, please, do your thang.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 06:56 AM
-5

I wouldn’t say this is misandry. This is fairly accurate assessment of things from a control standpoint. The biggest mistake is the “building blocks of society” thing, because it’s only a half-truth at best. Male labor is still exploited, but women dgaf are will probably be OK if men slowly ceased to exist. And NOWHERE does this post assume “that all men want to be in a traditional male provider role”.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/02/26 11:34 PM
3

Is it stereotyped? They want boytoys they can keep in their periphery and hang out with, brag about, talk sh*t about males/dating with, and live some fantasy of making their bf jealous, plausible deniability for cheating, etc. I don’t think it’s overly malicious or harmful. But I’m not gay and i wouldn’t know.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 03:02 PM
1

who flat out told me that she wanted “to get a gay bestie.” …”Get?” Eh that doesn’t sound THAT bad. I want a Brazilian friend so I can visit Brazil with them. I want a Jewish friend so I can get into the inner circles of wealth creation and world domination.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 06:27 AM
5

Children usually, but yes, they’re disengaging from that too
/r/MensRights08/02/26 04:02 AM
6

You get what you bargain for, and women bargain collectively. Men bargain individually
/r/MensRights08/02/26 12:53 AM
1

MGTOW isn’t really a thing. Men can’t choose against their biological needs. Women have shaped society to meet their biological needs allowing them to GTOW. Men have not/cannot get that from society.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 02:00 PM
2

Cool. Good to ponder about
/r/MensRights05/02/26 08:40 PM
2

Because the space itself changes. Society is gynocentric. And that gynocentrism floods that space rather than women adjusting to meet the standard of the space. Meanwhile women’s spaces remain restricted, and shifts/adjusts in ways to prevent men from entering or enjoying it at all. Take for example education. Or psychology. Formerly mens’ spaces. Or literature. Overtaken by women, and now the space excludes men. Inclusion of women isn’t the problem. It’s that women have a significant in-group b…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 04:55 PM
5

I don’t think so. Women have in-group bias in their gender. Men do not. All men are competition to other men. Men can’t ignore away a society that’s “women and children first (men expendable)” while women collectively bargain for their version of ‘equality’. In a modern society that diminishes the advantage of being male, until there are artificial wombs or something, the economy of sperm vs egg is a completely lopsided win for women.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter