TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SweetJeebus Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by SweetJeebus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A virgin who knows all about women.😂
/r/AllPillDebate07/08/23 03:32 PM
1

Why isn’t it you who learns to live with life as it is? Learn to accept your physical condition. A lazy eye is not a reason to force a woman into servitude. You’re being mentally and emotionally weak and want society to cure your weakness by giving you what you want. All this talk about women being emotionally immature is projection. It’s you. You are describing yourself every time you write about women.
/r/AllPillDebate07/08/23 01:18 PM
1

You are backwards as hell my man. None of this is to benefit women. It’s because you would rather force yourself onto a woman than improve yourself and get someone to like you. All the Chad nonsense is a way for you to make it seem like it’s really society and not you who is the problem. Women aren’t objects as much as you want them to be. You are going to remain frustrated if you keep thinking this way.
/r/AllPillDebate07/08/23 01:11 PM
1

Happiness of families or of men? Because you only seem to care about the impacts on men and completely disregard women. Judging by your use of “Chad” I suspect you don’t think the impact on women matters at all.
/r/AllPillDebate07/08/23 12:58 PM
1

You keep saying the same thing over an over but you are ignoring the question. What good is all of that if it requires stripping human rights from half of the people to achieve it? Your desire to have sex isn’t worth all of that.
/r/AllPillDebate07/08/23 12:51 PM
1

What is the point of producing “stable long term families” if it’s dependent on stripping human rights from half of the people in those families. There is no virtue in that.
/r/AllPillDebate07/08/23 12:48 PM
2

School shooters are strong men with control over their emotions?
/r/AllPillDebate06/08/23 03:36 AM
2

He needs forced marriage because no woman would actually choose to be with him. He’s working his little butt off to make it “logical.”
/r/AllPillDebate06/08/23 03:35 AM
2

Hold on, so in THAT scenario, women were so clear minded that they were able to influence world leaders into committing atrocities but in ALL other cases, they are bipolar toddlers that can’t think straight. Holy fuck this is dumb.
/r/AllPillDebate06/08/23 03:34 AM
1

How many times have you typed the word menstruation? You seem really obsessed with periods. You are imagining some boogie man in a red hood casting spells on women to confuse them. Your obsession is pretty funny.
/r/AllPillDebate06/08/23 03:30 AM
-29

She got annoyed that you bothered her. So what? Is that really worth all the time you are spending on replies to this post? I mean this is the teenage version of old people complaining on Nextdoor about “disrespectful kids.”
/r/MensRights07/12/21 01:04 AM
1

They didn’t fire you and hire someone new for diversity. You weren’t working out for them so they hired someone else. Sorry.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 06:03 AM
3

They don't give the margin of error yet your post above stated that it did. So how then did you make your statement?
/r/MensRights22/10/17 11:35 AM
10

If that is the case, isn't communicating clearly even more important? Or is this just circle jerk material?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:05 AM
4

Eww, this made me feel gross just reading it.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 01:59 AM
2

Absolutely right. Turning this into a debate about social expectations is ridiculous. They were not thinking about social norms or being a hero so protect their manhood. They reacted out of fear of losing a loved one. Trying to make this about anything else actually dishonors these men.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:31 AM
4

It was really entertaining watching you come up with ways to be offended by this. The knots you tired yourself in were quite impressive.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 11:46 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 11:44 PM
6

At first, I found it funny when I disagreed with the feminist talking points and they called me a typical "MRA" or misogynist, only to inform them that I was a woman. Now, it's just obnoxious.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:26 AM
2

Same here. They both have interesting topics and discussions.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:24 AM
1

I would consider myself a feminist, and I for one acknowledge that males are victims of rape, domestic abuse, oppression and so on. Acknowledging facts doesn't really help anything if you aren't acting on those facts. That is why some men feel the need for their own group. Feminism has done plenty for female victims of rape, domestic abuse and oppression. If feminism recognizes this issue exists for the male population, why aren't they doing just as much for men if it's all about equality?
/r/MensRights29/01/12 12:12 AM
-2

we need to nurture what is (oppressively) regarded as "feminine" characteristics, things like compassion, openness, emotion, humility etc. etc. You have committed one of the biggest examples of blaming the victim I have seen, and I'm sure you have railed against this same thing when speaking of women. Can you imagine if some man responded to statistics of man on woman abuse with some garbage like this? What you are saying is that the solution to woman on man violence is to nurture mens' feminine…
/r/MensRights29/01/12 12:03 AM
1

I think the poster is pretty stupid, but not for the reasons you've listed here. It's not absurd to demand that people do not rape others just as it's not absurd to say you shouldn't kill another person. It's not saying that men need to protect women, it's saying that men shouldn't rape women. The problems with the poster are: It assumes that the typical male is prone to rape women without talking himself out of it (or having a friend stop him from doing it), and Only men are responsible for rap…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 10:24 PM
6

doesn't this perpetuate the "trivializing rape" thing that feminists themselves are constantly bitching about? That is exactly what this poster does, but it also assumes all men to be a potential rapist by default.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 10:19 PM
0

In this case, it's almost like selling a drug our medical device. I'm sure it falls under one of those types of regulations. I'm sure you can't sell your blood the way he is attempting to sell his sperm.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 09:53 PM
2

I was very confused by that entire thing. That is a world I have no clue about. That being said, this woman is an idiot and I'm not sure why anything she says about a penis is relevant.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:40 PM
1

In Massachusetts, we pay police officers ridiculous amounts in overtime pay to stand around and do the same thing. It makes me so angry evertime I pass a construction site with people working with a cop standing there drinking a cup of coffee.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:15 PM
5

There is a socially accepted way of insulting fat women. Everything you are complaining about the word "creeper" applies to the way many men react to fat women.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:39 AM
8

Fatty, cankles, dog, butterface, the list goes on. Assholes come in both genders.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:38 AM
8

I'd have to agree with this. It's okay, as long as he agrees with the definition. Some people ARE creepy just like some people are arrogant or shy. It's not cool to make people feel like shit because you aren't attracted to them, but some people are also just assholes.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:36 AM
-1

TIL r/MensRights takes queues from r/atheism
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:09 AM
0

The positive claim is that the conversation is true. If there is no evidence, the default (null hypothesis) is that it is NOT true. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:06 AM
5

This article was written by a right wing nut job male, not your ex wife.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 10:23 PM
7

IT is not the only subject studied using computers.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 01:23 AM
1

you can't make absolute statements like it's BS -- in fact you can't do that at all because nothing is black and white That is exactly what the original comment was.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 09:38 PM
0

So I guess we can't make statements about anything that happened before we were born. You should speak to those prickish Historians.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 09:33 PM
0

I'm not sure you know what the word entitled means. Maybe it has changed meaning over the years.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 09:29 PM
2

What exactly was entitled about my statement. It's also not very mature to be calling people you don't know a prick.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 09:09 PM
3

I'm not defending feminists, only stating that the original statement said nothing about money. Although I'm not sure why you would expect monetary support for mens' issues from feminists. It's like feminists being surprised that Mens Rights groups don't support feminist issues.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:52 PM
5

The OP stated that he has heard no comment from feminists. The statement mentions no money.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:46 AM
18

I'm sorry this out total BS. Cheating men and women have been around far before even your generation. This is the typical, ”back in my day...”
/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:45 AM
1

He is a "dead beat," meaning he doesn't pay child support.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:36 PM
1

That's all well and good, but that is not what the discussion is about.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:31 PM
3

However, I never understood why giving birth is assumed to be bigger burden or more of an issue than being forced to support or want 18+ years man didn't agree to. This is a good question and I don't think I've ever heard an answer to this. I always hear people use the birth thing as though it trumps all other arguments. DISCLAIMER: I am a woman who has never given birth. I'm not trying to say that it's easy, but I can logically assume (because some women do it a few times) that it's not as bad …
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:20 PM
4

I think the point is that the comic speaks to what a man in that situation is CALLED. It relies on the idea that: Everyone agrees with deadbeat dad rules (which is mostly true) Everyone is pro-choice (not true) I do however agree that men should have a similar right to opt out of parenting.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:16 PM
1

I disagree as well. Where I grew up, there were so many cases where either the mother, father, or both abandoned their children, leaving it up to grandparents to raise the kids. The "women" (usually very young) go out and party all the time while the "men" (also very young) are either not around at all or partying all the time. They are both equally disgusting.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:13 PM
1

Is that required in some places? It certainly shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:04 PM
1

You are reading something into this study that is not there.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 08:25 PM
1

Again, you are using the same argument they used since the beginning of the feminist movement. They pointed to objective evidence that, because of the way the system was rigged, men -- all men -- benefited from the social prejudices against women. This argument distracts from the real issues that MR's is trying to combat. IF you want to go down the same route as the feminist movement -- which you apparently dislike, that's fine. But don't pretend it's any different.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 01:40 AM
3

"The neural response during anticipation was related to the success of remembering that event in the future." Interesting study, but not sure what this has to do with MensRights.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 11:15 PM
2

NONE....virtually...
/r/MensRights24/08/11 11:11 PM
2

I agree with your last two paragraphs. However your first point is EXACTLY what feminists say about men (you benefit from male privilege, ect, ect).
/r/MensRights24/08/11 10:30 PM
1

Not outright, but many of their arguments end with "because men are perverts." It's their last line of defense.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 10:26 PM
1

That's why it is ok. YOU don't like that set up, however there are men who do. That woman who expects to be paid for will eventually find the guy who insists on it. Just consider it another preference.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 10:23 PM
3

My BF and I have always had somewhat of a non-traditional relationship. For a couple of years, I was working while he was going to school. We (more like he) got shit for not making the money. It was extremely irritating. When we first started dating, we always went dutch and it was never a big deal. Now we have a joint bank account and we are still considered weird because we're not married. You can't win.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 10:21 PM
1

When I read this, I got really sad. Then I realized that my relationship with my BF is NOTHING like this. We have consensual drunk sex all the time.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 12:46 AM
1

Vatican City and Catholic Church is hardly a source of morality.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:05 AM
4

The big question is, why all the responsibility of this "rape or not" -issue is thrust on mens shoulders? Isn't the female also responsible to make sure that the male is fully consent? Why it's only discussed that the male should ask questions like "are you sure you're alright", not the female too? After having watched this argument over the past couple of days, I have realized that these feminists are willing to state that women are naive and in need of saving by men. We cannot handle our booze…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:29 PM
2

The type to avoid answering such a simple question. What is your response?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:21 PM
1

BTW, how does that logic not apply to a drunk man? He wasn't of sound mind, therefore he cannot be responsible for his actions. It's stupid reasoning when applied to men AND women.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:20 PM
1

How can you prevent sleeping? You HAVE to sleep to survive. You do not have to drink alcohol until you are drunk. You're comparison is still false.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:17 PM
2

A sexual relationship is much more complicated than spray painting the side of police building and the consequences of sex are VERY different than tagging. You are making a false comparison.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 05:38 PM
2

Usually it's the men who say it's ok, not women. I don't think that's ok either.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 05:35 PM
3

I never said I agreed with the punishment.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 05:35 PM
5

All the above applies to a 10 yo. Do you believe that a 10 yo can consent to a sexual relationship with a 19 yo? At what age do you draw the line for consent? Based on what?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 04:59 PM
6

I disagree completely. A 14 yo kid is not able to consent to something as they do not have the full understanding of what a sexual relationship is. It is the understanding of child development that has made society change their mind about children and relationships.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 04:57 PM
4

Sorry but a 19 yo sleeping with a 14 yo girl is not ok to most people.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 04:11 PM
2

You are only considering financial contributions, not others. You may not agree that taking care of kids 24 hrs a day is equal to 60-70 hrs/week, but some may beg to differ. I for one would not choose to stay home and take of children instead of working those long weeks. I don't think it's fair for two people to make plans to split the responsibilities as a team and then when it doesn't work out, the person who was able to work moves on, leaving the other person with no way to support themselves…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 04:05 PM
1

The problem with your argument is that you accept your own broad generalizations as fact to support your point, however require more data when the person above cites an increase in stay at home dads. That is not to say that you are incorrect, but you are creating an argument that is not reasoned. What will happen is that people will work on picking apart your generalizations instead of arguing the actual point.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:54 PM
1

This applies perfectly to the drunken sex/ consent argument. If a woman and man have drunk sex, the woman is clearly being raped because she can't consent. That argument only works if you believe the woman to be unable to think and act for herself.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:49 PM
13

I can't defend this guy. A 19 yo should know not to be messing around with 15 and 14 yo girls. It's not even a matter of gender, its a matter of age. If he were messing around with 15 or 14 yo boys, it would be the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:27 PM
6

No, it's really the fault of the guy she is masturbating to. If he weren't so attractive...
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:12 PM
3

But we don't excuse a person's behavior simply because they weren't of sound mind due to alcohol consumption. Your comparison is false - a sleepwalker didn't consume something while he was awake, knowing that he would sleepwalk later.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:47 PM
1

that men must protect me from myself by saying NO on my behalf whenever I've been drinking. That hits the nail right on the head. I can't believe these women repeat this crap as if it makes sense.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:32 PM
7

The idea that drunken sex between two adults automatically equals the rape of the woman is absurd. You are reducing us women to frail, naive little girls who are too stupid to make decisions -- even while drunk. How is this equal? How is it not rape when the guy is drunk and she is not?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:28 AM
4

I'm all for the responsibility, so it's the responsibility of the guy not to stick his dick in an unconscious person.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 01:10 AM
1

I am new to these topics, both feminism and mens rights. I am trying to catch up as fast as I can.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 01:46 AM
2

Shrug the guy off as jerk, call him an asshole and move on. If the mean person was a woman and she called the poster fat, would there be an entire blog post about it? No. Some people are jerks, period.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 10:24 PM
9

Hypocrisy is a hobby for many humans.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 10:03 PM
4

Everyone is responsible for their own reaction to events that occur in their lives. In this case, she let this one person's comments define her life.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:59 PM
3

Again with the assumptions. If I said something as ignorant as your last statement (like men are too busy using women for sex), you would call foul. But if you say it about women, it's in the name of Men's Rights. It goes both ways.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:11 PM
8

You can try to convince the men on here that there are in fact rational women, but you will always get a few that are simply the male equivalent of a feminist. It's like fundie Christians that hate on fundie Muslims for being extremist.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:07 PM
2

As opposed to your flawless logic of "all women are like x because I've chosen shitty women to associate with." It's not the fault of all women that you have met horrible women.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:05 PM
1

I'm not here to further the cause of men over women, but that does not mean that I am doing the reverse. I have brothers and would be mad as hell if some evil woman took take advantage of them in any way in the name of feminism or any other bullshit excuse. It's about fairness, and because of this subreddit, I am now aware of discrimination against men that I didn't know existed. So go fuck yourself, MAN.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 01:27 AM
2

You should also stop eating dogshit.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:10 AM
1

I am completely new to the ideas of mens' rights and feminism. I don't know any lingo from either side. I have subscribed to this reddit for some time, but I just subscribed to the feminist subreddit today since it was discussed so much on this very post. I literally know nothing about feminism except that it is hated by this subreddit. You should really try not to jump to so many conclusions, you were wrong on every single leap.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:09 AM
1

Thanks for the entertainment btw. You are officially the first actual troll I have encountered on reddit, and you sure are a feisty one!
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:59 AM
2

What on earth are you talking about. Now I'm a feminist? You need take a midol or something. Your panties are in a twist.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:56 AM
2

I can see your point, especially given the quote you've provided. I had never heard of this woman before and was only analyzing the situation that was discussed in the original post.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:55 AM
1

So your assertion is that guys cannot be around girls without wanting to fuck her. Isn't that completely against what the MRM believes? You're so lame.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:18 AM
1

Not that it matters to you, but I have a bf of 10 years and a small group of mutual friends that happen to be male. You can make all the wild guesses you want about women that you have never met just so that you can keep your mind in the little box in inhabit, but your guesses mean nothing. You can keep trying to label me, it isn't working.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:17 AM
1

Lame.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 03:53 AM
1

Kinda like all those feminists who don't have any friends that believe 'typically feminist' things... I don't actually have an girl friends, or feminist male friends. Sorry to ruin your generalizations about women.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:38 AM
1

I'm not wondering. For the most part, the group I work with is very young and frankly not in to feminist propaganda at all. Most wouldn't even know what feminism really is. Like I said, those men are a small minority. I'm not trying to be accusatory or anything, I'm just saying what I have experienced in my short 4 years. The truth is, there is one loud feminist in our group -- and it's a guy (who happens to be my manager). I tend to roll my eyes at his feminist rants, along with his conspiracy …
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:35 AM
6

Yea I can see the difference in those statements. I think the whole thing got blown out of proportion though. From what is sounds like, she was just complaining about a guy who made her feel uncomfortable. I don't think she ever said she got hurt. She said, "guys, don't do that." I can see her point in a way because sometimes you just don't want to deal with advances. It's not hurtful or scary, just annoying sometimes.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:40 AM
2

Luckily I don't work with anyone like that.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:32 AM
1

Bingo. This is the exact same argument. I generally like Dawkins, but he put his foot in his mouth for sure. *edit: meant to reply to bbeard
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:01 PM
0

Dawkins' argument is a quite silly. There will always be problems greater than mine and yours. From what I can tell, she only expressed something she didn't like about a situation. I wouldn't have been so offended by that situation, but that is just me. She is entitled to bitch about a man's advance just as you bitch about money grubbing women. This entire drama is completely childish.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:56 PM
3

I think the idea that someone can't get something like this because of one's gender is pretty absurd. I would argue that it has more to do with having ever been in a situation where you feel physically threatened or sexually harassed by a more powerful person. This can happen to men and women alike. If you have never felt that type of fear, it would be hard to understand.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:07 PM
7

Why should any man care about this? Because it could help get to the root of the problems men face when it comes to family law, rape cases, and the like. While men and women often face different obstacles, we do not live in discrete worlds. Our views about these different obstacles affect the other gender. It's like closing your eyes to the reasons behind a terrorist attack or massacre. You can try to understand why they did it to come to a solution or simply blame it on the fact that they hate …
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:56 PM
10

Thanks for that. Since I have joined the workforce out of college (4 years ago), I was surprised at what I found at my job. I was expecting to go into my Engineering position as a tiny minority in a room full of sexist males. I have not found that to be the case at all. I cannot speak about how my pay compares to others, but I am well compensated when compared to the median expected income for my job in my area. This is of course just my story, but it is also the story for the other well respect…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:49 PM
6

Can you provide a source? This is contrary to everything I have ever heard on the subject -- which in no way means that it isn't true.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:23 PM
4

Did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:15 PM
6

Since when is it such a terrible thing to suggest that someone read something? The only people that react this way are people who are closed minded and have a very frail handle on their loudly proclaimed criticisms.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 12:18 AM
6

This type of poll is so stupid.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 09:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter