TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Swiggy Archive

View 27 posts and 489 comments by Swiggy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2397

False AccusationSwiggy/r/MensRights06/04/17 11:52 AM
538

DiscriminationSwiggy/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:39 PM
214

GeneralSwiggy/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:51 PM
195

False AccusationSwiggy/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:06 PM
168

Edu./Occu.Swiggy/r/MensRights24/01/18 01:55 AM
158

Social IssuesSwiggy/r/MensRights07/04/19 03:08 PM
135

Social IssuesSwiggy/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:20 PM
125

FeminismSwiggy/r/MensRights07/02/18 08:48 PM
96

Edu./Occu.Swiggy/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:27 PM
82

Edu./Occu.Swiggy/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:47 PM
73

Swiggy/r/MensRights04/02/17 04:06 AM
70

Swiggy/r/MensRights13/04/19 04:11 PM
65

Social IssuesSwiggy/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:07 PM
53

False AccusationSwiggy/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:41 AM
46

Edu./Occu.Swiggy/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:10 PM
45

Edu./Occu.Swiggy/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:37 PM
42

Legal RightsSwiggy/r/MensRights10/01/19 04:11 PM
31

Social IssuesSwiggy/r/MensRights05/05/15 12:20 AM
25

Swiggy/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:11 PM
17

DiscriminationSwiggy/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:38 PM
16

Social IssuesSwiggy/r/MensRights09/07/18 08:28 PM
14

Social IssuesSwiggy/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:23 AM
3

Social IssuesSwiggy/r/MensRights05/08/17 07:12 PM
1

Swiggy/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:45 PM
1

Social IssuesSwiggy/r/MensRights19/01/19 02:19 AM
1

Swiggy/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:51 AM
0

Swiggy/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:09 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Then they sue when you try and open a gym for men only.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 11:12 PM
3

Now, do I think she was being gender neutral because she was trying to recognize that an unwanted pregnancy impacts both men and women? I think she actually was trying to claim that it does impact men. After years of being told that men have no right to have any say in abortion issues, they know want to men to be more supportive of pro-abortion laws. She thinks using language like this, being forced to financially support and child that was not planned or wanted will shock men into action. Of co…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:41 PM
0

I said intentionally. That doesn't make any sense, given the comment you responded to. Do you think the claim is women are intentionally getting pregnant so they can have abortions? That is not what is being suggested. Do you know how many people think pulling out is an effective birth control method? I know people who don't what to use birth control who think pulling out is fine because they can always just get an abortion if it doesn't work.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:53 AM
20

What is the excuse for holding the man responsible for child support for a child he doesn't want?
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:46 AM
7

We can fight for a father's parental rights (paper abortion and reasonable divorces) without having to cut down on other people's rights Except the government isn't receptive to that unless women's "economic options" are threatened.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:59 AM
26

And if you hold a man responsible for his choice, you can hold a woman responsible for the same choice. What are you having trouble understanding?
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:39 AM
7

So what did you mean by, "It's for when an accident happens." You have unprotected sex what do you think is very likely to happen? That is not an accident, it is acting recklessly because you know abortion is available.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:24 AM
13

Are you really claiming that almost no one has unprotected sex? Because that sounds retarded as hell.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:14 AM
1

So when does the human clump of cells become a human being.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:07 PM
4

What are you demanding from women that would give you the rights you want? Simply political support. Especially since most (not all, but most) people making the legal decision about this are men People are electing these men.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:19 AM
1

Doesn't need to be explained. So simple, women shouldn't have anything to complain about this ruling. I'm sure if I look at your comment history it will be full of you commenting to women telling them as much.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:40 AM
1

so at what point does this "human clump of cells" actually become a human?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:05 AM
9

we can help our sisters get their bodies back and perhaps they’ll return the favor when it’s our fight Perhaps...? What is wrong with demanding rights as a condition of support?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:46 PM
1

You purposely kill children during a war you will be prosecuted for war crimes.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:41 PM
2

So if you don't want to risk the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy don't have sex. So simple, I don't know why all those women are protesting. Just tell them not to have sex.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:50 PM
20

Male reproductive rights is a dumb idea. You are basically saying you want slave labor. Dumb idea? Slave labor? What do you think being forced to pay child support is?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:51 PM
34

What's that quote people who push back on men's rights like to use? Ah yes.. 'When You're Accustomed to Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression'
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:26 PM
4

Yes those subreddit contain social political topics, you really thought that was a gotcha huh. /r/chicago /r/LosAngeles /r/gifs ​ Also nice article and I agree with it , still haven’t gave any fucking evidence of women being fucking hostile with your generalization So twice you've been proven wrong and provided the evidence you asked for so you get desperate and move the goal posts. That is pathetic. "Duh... those subs are social political..." If all those subs fit your loose description of "soc…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:08 PM
6

It’s literally only on social political subreddits. It is on: /r/news /r/antiwork /r/LeopardsAteMyFace both /r/BlackPeopleTwitter and /r/WhitePeopleTwitter /r/agedlikemilk /r/LosAngeles /r/chicago /r/AskReddit /r/gifs So you are literally wrong. ​ A source that support your over generalization of women being hostile? For example, this is the train of thought encountered frequently. https://aninjusticemag.com/should-men-be-able-to-opt-out-of-fatherhood-ec1537dbd02c
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:34 PM
6

...women losing their rights to get an abortion in many states it’s should be a big deal for this sub. Explain why when it is all over everywhere else. This sub is needed because there is no support anywhere else. Also never got that source of most women being “hostile” What kind of source are you looking for exactly?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:07 PM
10

The point of this subreddit is to actually fight for both sex rights against the feminist who only fight for themselves? Ah so you're of the "Women" means women and "Men" means everyone proponents. It’s not”well your not supporting my gender so I won’t fight for your”. Your just as bad as the people who ignore your “rights” You can fight for other's rights. This isn't the sub for it. 99% of reddit is doing what OP is demanding. No need to encroach on a tiny portion of this site dedicated to men.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:42 PM
13

....like no bitch both are bad See, not only was there almost zero support for men from women in changing this "both are bad" situation, most were openly hostile towards it. So to come here and demand that men need to support "human rights" for others is nonsense.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:03 PM
14

There was to ending slavery as well.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:29 PM
27

Are you actively trying to look backward? What next, reinstate slavery? Extending human rights to the unborn is like extending human rights to enslaved people. So we are moving forward.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:08 PM
0

I said 50 year olds. Let's go back and see what you actually wrote shall we? "Cardiac arrest at 56 is very uncommon." Where are the stats for only 50 year olds on there? Oh dear, you seem to have forgotten to post your link. I'm sure it was an oversight on your part. I'm sure you won't forget next time. Maybe you just don't know how. Let me show you how it is done a second time, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org see I can go it twice, you can surely manage to do it once, can't you.....?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 10:39 PM
0

Those statistics aren’t relevant as they don’t measure all deaths.... Yes they are, and you know it. but keep acting like you don't know you are wrong. You are free to post your own stats that you think are more relevant. I eagerly await your statistics, I'm sure it won't take you long.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 09:20 PM
0

https://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/lcod/men/2016/all-races-origins/index.htm
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:43 PM
-1

Or in other words, it’s not even close to the leading cause of death for men in their 50’s. Yes it is.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:53 PM
-1

No I’m just not using statistics how you want to me to. You mean in context, when responding to a comment of how he died and speculation of cocaine use? The man died, the question was how. Citing a stat of men who did not die is inappropriate. If I got Covid and then said I lost my sense of smell, and somebody said that was very common, you would chime in and say, "No, losing your sense of smell isn't common at all... only 1.2% ....." It's in the context of people who have Covid that it is commo…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:14 AM
1

You are using statistics incorrectly. Period.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:53 AM
1

It's more like 25% of the men who die. And this man died.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:42 AM
2

Of men who die in their 50's what % die from heart attacks? And we know this man was in his late 50's and he died. The question was what did he die of, not what are the chances of any man dying of a heart attack. We already know he died, the question is how. And we also know he complained of chest pains before he collapsed. What does that sound like? Mercury poisoning?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:30 AM
-1

It's the leading cause of death for men over 45. This guy died and he was 56 or 57, so give me reason why you wouldn't think it likely was a heart attack?
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:59 PM
-2

It’s still uncommon Compared to what other causes of death for men that age?
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:49 PM
2

No it isn't. Stop spreading this myth, it can kill men. Men delay seeking treatment when they have symptoms, "I'm too young to have a heart attack", then they go into cardiac arrest and it is too late.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:08 PM
13

if staying behind in a warzone was the better option than being a refugee why are there any refugees?
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:51 PM
12

They also want equal pay but don't want to take equal risks. Also found it interesting, but not surprising, that the article points out racial differences in death rates but ignores gender differences, which are far greater.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 12:37 AM
1

Your comment is so ignorant. No, you are just ignorant. Read the comment again and then come back and apologize for posting something so stupid.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:20 AM
3

This is good news for women who may be raped or forced into pregnancy. No it isn't'. You can already sue for that in those cases. The bill intentionally states: or causes an unintended pregnancy, regardless of circumstances*; knowingly engages in conduct that aids or abets a sexual assault or domestic abuse or causes an unintended pregnancy,* regardless of circumstances It is another of these "The woman is a helpless victim...." nonsense bills. The funny thing is is that the bill does confirm th…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 01:52 AM
1

He is not-guilty, which is not the same a innocent because his trial was thrown out.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 05:10 PM
1

The metaphor is obviously trying to drive home the fact that the "crime prevention suggestion" implies if you want to remain unharmed you shouldn't go out at night. No the metaphor obviously is trying to single out a demographic for being the cause of a problem and therefore everyone in that group should be forced under penalty of law to comply. Its not a particularly complex metaphor and I'm shocked I have to explain it, really I'm shocked you can't understand that outrage doesn't make a person…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 02:45 PM
13

Proves she was correct that there is a poignant and unjust double standard here. People aren't outraged because of the double standard as it is a very poor analogy, comparing a crime prevention suggestion to a law that requires compliance. People are outraged, as any group would be, at the suggestion that they be blamed for the actions of a very small % of its population. (Go back to refer to my minority example.)
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:47 PM
16

The outrage proves she was correct. Wait so outrage proves somebody is correct? How does that work. If someone suggested a curfew on minorities would the fact that there is outrage to the remark make them correct?
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:04 PM
8

Imagine if this pic was posted and the comments focused on "being a cop is so tough" https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/08/081420Shooting2wf-e1597471603651.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1286
/r/MensRights28/01/21 01:24 AM
1

Gender skew here doesn't seem to be a problem: While state officials recently raised concerns about “idle” government workers, including the 92.8 percent of secretaries and administrative assistants who are women (DBEDT, 2018) But we have to do something about this: ... ensuring women have access to “green jobs” in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and environmental management and construction jobs (89.9% male workers) through stimulus programs that promote gender and racial equity
/r/MensRights05/08/20 09:38 PM
6

Black people in the UK four times more likely to die from Covid-19 than white people, new data shows Certain this will not be spun into one race is "stronger" than the other.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 08:55 PM
2

the title of the thread really explains it all. Celebrity hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 02:53 AM
8

Everyone knows the double standard. "Believe women", apologists are now claiming that the slogan only means the claims should be taken seriously and investigated. But what happens when claims are investigated and there is no hard evidence so it becomes a case of "he said, she said"? "Believe women" advocates where pushing for believe women unless the man was pretty much able to provide irrefutable evidence that he is innocent or else he was guilty. Oh, and most of the evidence that would be cons…
/r/MensRights13/05/20 12:43 AM
92

Eight out of 10 nurses are women, perhaps the most extreme example of how this crisis squeezes women at home and at work. What would men know about dangerous jobs that put their lives and health at risk? It's not like men make up 90% of workplace injuries and fatalities.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:20 AM
3

No it is not ok. In cases that hinge on consent it would go a long way into removing doubt if you didn't date the person you accused.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 06:17 PM
8

Dear women, If you want to see more convictions of rapists please follow these tips: Do not send rapist messages expressing your love after rape Do not date rapist for months or years after rape.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:15 AM
1

Online abuse is a real problem. I thought they actually had laws against it in the UK.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 08:54 PM
7

No I don't have source. It was a TV news story. It just stuck with me at how bluntly it was put. This article offers some of the same sentiment. Mandatory arrests are part of the supposed "War on Women" From the data, she speculates that mandatory arrest policies in some states' domestic violence laws might actually be harming victims more than they're helping by facilitating the arrests of women who are simply defending themselves. "The empirical evidence and policy analysis are more than sugge…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:18 PM
19

Yes, I remember seeing a story about a women's group who pushed to pass a mandatory arrest law in domestic violence cases. After a couple years they were angry that almost half the arrests turned out to be women. They pretty came out and said although the law was written as gender neutral the intent of the law was to only lock up men.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:19 PM
7

Victims don't always support prosecuting their abusers. I actually think a better term than "don't always" is "most of the time". That is just reality and the complex nature of many domestic violence situations.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:14 PM
44

U.S Women's Top 3 Issues: 1) It's my body, the government should pay for my abortion and birth control 2) Equal pay for working fewer hours 3) We want more legislation passed based off of false rape and domestic violence statistics.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 04:17 AM
2

Maybe a larger issue is that saying women should just insist on a condom ignores a huge power dynamic that exists between men and women in the real world — and maybe especially in the sexual world. Yes, everyone knows men have all the power when it comes to having sex. Right.....
/r/MensRights18/01/20 05:03 AM
12

Nobody pays for sports by the hour. Sponsors do. And to repeat what I posted: I know this was the longest match in history on the men's side and match length is unpredictable from year to year but what is constant is that men play best of 3 of 5 while women play best 2 of 3 in grand slam events. This almost assuredly results in the men playing longer matches. Much of the reporting you hear and read about the gender pay gap will read "women make 73 cents for every dollar men earn". Politicians sp…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 11:39 PM
10

I know this was the longest match in history on the men's side and match length is unpredictable from year to year but what is constant is that men play best of 3 of 5 while women play best 2 of 3 in grand slam events. This almost assuredly results in the men playing longer matches. ​ Much of the reporting you hear and read about the gender pay gap will read "women make 73 cents for every dollar men earn". Politicians spend time and money and pass laws citing this statistic but the main reason f…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 11:34 PM
10

This from an organization who hired a "journalist" who used "#CancelWhitePeople" and wrote: "Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men." ​ And this is what they wrote about a lawsuit brought by a group representing Asian Americans ​ The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against …
/r/MensRights16/06/19 12:16 AM
9

This has been a long established fact.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 12:07 AM
2

I see a lot of comments where men lash out at women for no reason, and subs where men are obviously isolated from women and don't give them basic human respect. That's not masculinity, that is misogyny. Those traits are not related at all. There is nothing masculine about not respecting women.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 01:10 AM
2

No, I want to show they how ridiculous many of their arguments are. If they are really committed to fixing the "gender pay gap" then be consistent. Of course we all know "gender" = women. ​ ​
/r/MensRights09/02/19 03:58 PM
4

Right all these academic articles are the same. They never ask "are schools failing boys".
/r/MensRights09/02/19 03:49 PM
2

They complained about prize money in professional tennis even though that's not a viable career option for 99.999% of people.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 03:47 PM
3

A man that big doesn't need to punch women in the face even if he's being physically attacked, which isn't seen in the video. All he needs to do is to push them back. Maybe he did initially push them back, but they kept coming at them. I'm not saying use excessive force, but too often in cases like this it is: "Why didn't he use the absolute bare minimum of force to make sure his assailant doesn't feel the slightest amount of discomfort". This sub is about "Don't hit people, period". I think if …
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:45 PM
0

Right, but the first image "only judging from the short video" is him seeming to throw one of the women to the ground. If they come after him after that occurred I would call that self defense. But like I wrote before, it seems the video doesn't tell the whole story.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:39 PM
7

Doesn't seem like there are any good guys in this story, no total villains either. Just a night of belligerent drunks. If the witness is accurate I don't know what would make these woman think they can hit a man twice their size and not get a beat down other than counting on female privilege. Or they've been watching too many movies and think a couple of high kicks can take down someone who outweighs you by 100lbs. ​ ​
/r/MensRights03/02/19 12:05 AM
2

>Suicide rate for men is over twice that of women in developed countries. ​ What would have made this commercial fine for me is if they showed men helping out other men. Like men are important for their own sake, not just for how we should serve women and children. How about helping a homeless veteran, hiring a guy others say is too old, making sure your dad keeps his dr's appointment? ​
/r/MensRights17/01/19 11:17 PM
2

You'd have to be dumb as hell to cooperate with the police, especially if you are innocent. You have zero to gain and could possibly find yourself in a legal nightmare. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
/r/MensRights11/01/19 03:36 PM
6

The "need" to solve crimes doesn't give them the right to put an intrusive dragnet on anyone who could have possibly done it.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:28 PM
4

That should be for the court to decide after she is charged.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 05:18 PM
1

Check out your university's publications. See if women are featured in STEM related pictures and if they are also featured in nursing, education, and social services. Ask why. ​ ​
/r/MensRights01/11/18 01:18 AM
3

I'm asking you what was credible about it, not fox news. Was it the fact that she didn't invoke dragons and/or aliens? Just about anyone could have provided the same testimony.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:54 PM
7

What farce are you referring to exactly? They interviewed people, they looked for any eyewitnesses, what more do you want them to do? ​ >Before it was announced?? I'm not sure whom you're talking about here, or what your point is quite frankly. Even before Trump’s expected Monday announcement, Democrats have launched a three-pronged approach to defeating his nominee: Frame the process around women’s health and the future of legalized abortion, mobilize the kind of nationwide protests that helped…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:38 PM
3

What more did you want them to do? Do you honestly think any amount of investigation would have satisfied the people who were against this nomination even before it was announced?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 03:39 PM
11

I'm a democrat, but I'm glad that false rape accusations didn't have the final say in this. ​ I wouldn't even call them false. There is no way of disproving them and there is no evidence proving them. And that is the way it is with most 40 year old accusations. Reasonable people should agree that in light of this that these shouldn't be held against the man accused.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 01:21 AM
2

>Well you could. You could very well do that but for some reason the republicans wanted to hold a vote before any such case could be heard. I thought you were claiming this was a victory for justice and due process? ​ Is there some time limit on these supposed perjury charges that I'm not aware of? If there is, please inform me. ​ ​
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:48 AM
7

You want to prove perjury, then go through due process. Unless you just want to convict someone of perjury based on TV and internet interviews. That would make you an anti-American idiot. ​ ​
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:20 AM
12

This is a victory for justice, a victory for due process, and if they play it right (which they won't) a victory for the Metoo movement. If you want men who aren't idiots to support metoo then you have to have some reasonable standards for due process not this "Blindly believe all women no matter what" nonsense. ​ 40 year old accusations should be looked at but in the absence of any evidence shouldn't be held against the accused. That is a fundamental value that we hold in this country.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 11:10 PM
2

Hope you aren't surprised by this. He was constantly pushing misleading pay gap nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:45 PM
1

Democrats keep shooting themselves in the foot by pandering.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 02:07 PM
5

Isn't this common in mixed doubles? The commentators are acting like they are surprised that he is going all out. Are the men expected not to serve at full speed when they are serving to the woman on the other team?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 04:23 PM
3

"Did the girls surf a different ocean that was easier we don't know about?" That's a good question. Why do we separate genders in this sport? Why not let everyone compete with no gender categories?
/r/MensRights28/06/18 07:22 PM
2

Great job. Thanks
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:47 PM
3

Would love to hear white feminists explain to incarcerated black men that they (white women) shouldn't have to go to prison because of the inequalities they had to face.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:02 PM
5

And phrases such as "ward sister" and "matron" may be "out-dated". "may be"?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:39 PM
3

Riled up? How much effort do you think it takes to post on an internet forum? Is it difficult for you? Can't you post something that you find amusing or interesting?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:20 PM
7

I don't usually defend Trudeau but this time he doesn't deserve to get shit on. And that is the point. Maybe now he will realize what a prick he sounds like when he quips about trivial pc microaggressions and panders to the hyper-sensitive.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:43 PM
7

Trudeau is no man. He is a male.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:05 PM
17

Employers still have the option of rewarding their workers based on experience, performance and other aspects. However, the companies must show that the differences in wages are not due to gender. So pretty much the same as anywhere else.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:39 PM
4

This is like banning Muslims because of 9/11
/r/MensRights30/12/17 12:23 AM
22

Shitty vandalism aside, I’ve looked into this statistic and it’s fairly flawed. Nothing you wrote shows any "flaws" in the statistics about deaths from the different types of cancer. The stats seem to be coming from this site: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-compendium-information-and-trends-by-cancer-type/report-contents/prostate-cancer-in-australia If it is accurate then the poster is correct: Estimated deaths from breast cancer (women): 3,087 Estimated deaths from prostate cance…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:57 PM
3

Poster is not in the U.S.. Look up Australian stats.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:53 PM
3

Yet another example of women complaining they are being treated unfairly when they are treated the same way men are.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:45 PM
1

Too bad. He has been part of the crowd that has demonized falsely accused men from even questioning the credibility of the accuser. No he can only say, "I remember it differently, but I'm sorry anyway."
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:34 PM
8

Exactly. "Why aren't more men feminists? We just want equal opportunity."
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:10 PM
2

When I was in the military every female was on some sort of light duty.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:14 AM
1

But the packaging of the film, the general vibe, and the tenor of the people applauding it just screams "men-only"—and specifically seems to cater to a certain type of very pretentious man who would love nothing more than to explain to me why I'm wrong about not liking it. Here's a very positive review from a female reviewer who doesn't seem to have the same problem looking at every film through a narrow filter that looks negatively upon stories that are about men. http://www.bbc.com/culture/sto…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 11:17 PM
4

It qualifies because of what she is complaining about about the movie. If she just said the plot wasn't strong enough and stopped there that would be different. But she goes on: "But the packaging of the film, the general vibe, and the tenor of the people applauding it just screams "men-only"—and specifically seems to cater to a certain type of very pretentious man who would love nothing more than to explain to me why I'm wrong about not liking it." Not only can't she watch a war movie based on …
/r/MensRights30/07/17 07:02 PM
13

She is publicly publishing her feelings and thoughts, so we have feelings and thoughts about her feeling and thoughts.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 04:35 PM
2

She has probably been conditioned by the mandatory tough as nails, , doesn't need any man to save her, warrior princess, can take out any man 3 times her size with a high kick, female character thrown into most of today's movies.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 04:00 PM
13

Granted, OP's post was meant to point out the statistics, but they did not need to put Bennington's, nor Cornell's name in the title or anywhere in the post to make his post seen. It may not have been his intention, but it looks like he is using the death of these two amazing singers to get his post seen by others. Sometimes it take the death of famous people to draw attention to an issue. When a celebrity is diagnosed with breast cancer they often disclose it publicly and say it is to draw atte…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:05 AM
19

Fuck, his body is barely cold and you're standing on top of it to wave your flag. Speaking for myself, I will proudly wave my flag to bring more attention to the serious crisis of men's suicide. Does not get the attention that it deserves.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:29 AM
18

Guns are one of the most lethal methods of suicide. Not every suicide attempt is premeditated, many are impulsive actions made under duress and/or the influence of drugs and alcohol. So it may be helpful to know, if you have an impulsive teen in your home.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:24 AM
37

Even worse are the men who are calling these two cowards, "They should just man up to their problems."
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:28 AM
4

The most disappointing thing is the movie company's reasoning behind this. Girl power = excluding men.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 03:18 PM
2

So just for the sake of argument let's say it was, so what? Does it make it more evil than those other atrocities that killed innocent people like running those people down with trucks? When these murderous monsters aren't politically correct and kill people without regard to equal opportunity that makes me so angry.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:07 AM
18

It not only the pressure and responsibilities for men to support the family. As it says in the article, for men your worth to society and to a lot of women will be diminished if you don't earn enough. If you follow your passion in a low paying field your "ambition" will be questioned.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:30 PM
6

so i dont think that she's being a hypocrite by saying that men who get hit by women are assholes But why would another woman be hitting her if she did not deserve it in some way? She is only applying the "you probably had it coming" argument when a woman hits a man. If she gets hit though, it is probably unjust.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:22 PM
0

https://www.thenation.com/article/press-and-watergate/
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:55 AM
0

Civilian deaths occur in war. It makes no difference. Yes it does make a difference. Look at how much the press was on Trump for Yemen. http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/02/02/512490365/yemen-aftermath-trumps-first-military-raid-continues-to-raise-questions "Locals say numerous civilians, including women and nine children, were among the Yemenis killed. "
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:31 AM
3

But you know, as Hillary Clinton said, "Women are the primary victims of war" so I guess these poor women have it so much worse. Yes, and how many first ladies dedicate their time and influence on improving lives of women and girls. Because marginalized men and boys don't need any help.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:10 AM
3

Everything isn't about hating men. Doesn't matter if it is hate or indifference to male suffering. Is the military take more care bombing targets that are near a school, hospital, or other target were women and children are likely to be as they are a site where men work and/or gather? If all men are counted as terrorists who is holding them accountable if they bomb a target that is next to a cement factory?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 01:51 AM
1

What difference does it make? Regardless of where we mark the tally, its still a human life. The difference it makes is that when civilians are killed hopefully people are held accountable. At that very least precautions should be taken to be a certain as possible that you are not intentionally targeting civilians. When all men are considered militants these bombings that cause many men to die go on unabated without regard for civilian life unless they are women and children.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 01:44 AM
10

"He couldn't even stay on the phone five minutes," she said. "He said, 'Babe, I have to go. I've got to pray and thank God because I've been in there for three months for something I didn't do.'" http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-uber-driver-rape-charge-dropped-met-20150406-story.html
/r/MensRights06/04/17 10:51 PM
3

Nobody is claiming this. But the "white males in general are relatively well off so no individual white males should have any problems", is part of the reason people don't offer/seek help.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:36 PM
5

The Obama administration, when assessing the aftermath of drone attacks, pretty much listed any man estimated to be of military age as not a civilian.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 07:26 PM
2

WE DEMAND YOU ARREST THAT MAN! no. THIS IS WHAT A POLICE STATE LOOKS LIKE!!!!!1!
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/17 04:08 AM
2

Guy's too big. White knight wimps only jump in when they can look good by beating up a smaller guy.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/17 03:59 AM
4

If your teammates feel the same way just refuse to say anything until everyone not with the team leaves and allows you time to shower and get changed. If anyone has a problem with this say this is a privilege female athletes are given. Say you'll be happy to answer questions later.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:03 PM
4

When I was in 3rd grade there was a nasty girl that lived down the street that was a couple of years older than me. Whenever me or my little sister would walk buy she would yell cruel things to us about my family because we were bi-racial. One day as I walked by she said something and we had our usual exchange of words but I brought up her crossed eye and that set her off. She came after me and scratched my face and started pulling my hair. To get her off me I hit her in the mouth, she wore brac…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:51 PM
1

Feminists tears and such
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:40 AM
4

There is a movement in the UK not to send women to prison at all. So you will likely see more cases like this version of "equality". "Women should not be sent to prison and should instead serve community sentences, according to a new report by the Women's Justice Taskforce." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13666066
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:55 PM
24

Reminds me of the "We have to stop locking up so many women in prison." alarms.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:03 PM
9

Just further demonstrates that the point that I have observed over the years. Being treated equally = oppression.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 11:45 PM
20

Anybody who reads this article should notice that. The author is either an idiot or it is fake. It is like an old white person writing, "Why don't colored people move to the back of the bus anymore? Do they think they deserve to sit in comfort more than the white folks?"
/r/MensRights11/09/16 10:18 PM
99

It’s the principle of the matter. Its that men still think their place, their comfort and their butt is more important than a woman’s. Entitled nonsense. You think that men should give up their seat to you because your comfort is more important than theirs.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 07:44 PM
3

Gender = women.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 03:47 PM
4

I don't get how women beating other women is "girl power" or female superiority. Especially since there has been complaining from female athletes about competing against other female athletes who have some male characteristics and having an unfair advantage.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 08:32 PM
2

" Women are often ensnared at the jagged edge of Broken Windows policing. Aside from drug offenses, other common charges for women include “minor property crimes, such as shoplifting; and simple assault, such as threats or minor attacks like biting, shoving, hitting, or kicking.” Anybody want to guess who these women are "biting, shoving, hitting, or kicking.” When women are arrested because of domestic violence laws that mandate arrests, the poor darlings are "ensnared" by an unjust system.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:34 PM
1

Have to get rid of the bonus system then. Not fair.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 01:57 AM
1

You can have paternal leave but since it really doesn't make a difference in who is bringing home less I still think women will choose to stay home just as much as they do now.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 01:57 AM
1

What if someone was attacked by a minority?
/r/MensRights03/08/16 12:00 AM
2

Why? Because it's a graveyard, yo. Yes but people with MBA's don't usually get paid by the hour, except maybe some consultants. Usually salary and bonus compensation structure.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 11:07 PM
2

This is not necessarily discriminatory, but largely societal. I think by and large this is a choice that women want to make. I have seen similar efforts to close the pay and achievement gaps and there is usually push back when women are given the choice to give up their social and family life to dedicate to work. However, one policy that could decrease the hours-worked gap would be paid maternal and paternal leave, allowing fathers and mothers to be on equal (legal) footing with regard to taking…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 10:57 PM
4

Goldin's argument is that, A is not necessarily a bad worker and that companies should try to reduce the influence working long hours has to career progression. A is not a bad worker, and doesn't get a bad salary. People who work longer and harder generally get promoted, this is not a gender issue that needs to be fixed. If A and B were both men nobody would be bothered by the way this works.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:40 PM
14

Closing the wage gap means making jobs work differently. If the wage gap is caused by men working more hours then it is not a problem that needs to be "closed".
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:36 PM
1

And what? And this is a 3rd thing they say. Do you not think it's an issue that men have lower life expectancy? Of course. We should do more about it. That's pretty crazy that white women's life expectancy also dropped. And this seems to be some sort of call for action, but the lower men's life expectancy is just accepted. We have men's sports leagues drawing special attention to breast cancer, how about all cancer, and heart disease.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 08:27 PM
6

And .. ? >White women are left behind http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-women-suffered-biggest-drop-in-life-expectancy-in-the-us_us_5716c98be4b06f35cb711a49 The group with one of the longest life expediencies is "left behind". Compare this to people who mock men for complaining about anything because of supposed "privilege".
/r/MensRights31/07/16 08:10 PM
1

Actually white US soldiers are mass murderers who have killed far more innocents than the terrorists have killed westerners. In Iraq alone they killed a million civilians. Do you have a source on this? (That's my nice way of calling you a liar).
/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:22 AM
1

"Building her whole political story for the whole first half of the speech around her marriage to him. " Which is the reason she is in the position she is today.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 10:42 PM
8

By itself no. But what is gradually happening in the courts is the same thing that has taken hold in college. The accuser is to believed, any evidence to the contrary will be discarded as some sort of rape induced trauma and confusion, and the defended will be in a position to have to prove his innocence beyond reasonable doubt. In cases like this that will be virtually impossible to do, especially if any behavior to suggest that the sex was consensual is discarded because there is no normal rap…
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:28 PM
1

You're trying to teach some sort of lesson here and taking the long route around the problem. Politicians will not stop pandering to women if women are supporting these selective laws so you have to do what is politically feasible. Hopefully the unfairness will also be addressed by the courts.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:46 PM
1

Lowering insurance rates for different demographics of people in a capitalistic society doesn't make sense. It makes perfect sense if you are going to have to do it equally for both genders. You say women should have to pay higher premiums based on their claims. They don't know because they have the politicians pandering to their agenda. Why wouldn't they (women) push for "equality" in this manner if it is applied selectively only when women benefit. Maybe if it always and consistently worked bo…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:34 AM
1

"I learned young women are held back from achievement only because none of us are doing enough to combat it." They aren't really achieving anything, they are being shielded and protected from any competition.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:59 PM
1

What is your point?! Inequities that happen to men should be addressed equally, but they are rarely a concern. If the suicide % was reversed what do you think would happen, and the answer to the problem is not that more women should commit suicide.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:11 PM
2

This goes beyond that. Women get paid more - celebration. Women are over represented in a certain industry - celebration, more women in college - celebration. Women are the focus of the incarceration rate even though there are many times more men locked up. Gender inequities are ONLY a problem when the gender is female.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 02:49 PM
1

How about complaining about the fact that when women end up, justifiably, paying more that gets legislatively addressed, but when men end up paying more that is ignored?
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:46 PM
3

The same way women cost health insurance companies more. And the ACA and various state laws made charging women more for insurance illegal even though it was justified.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:00 PM
3

What about Pride and Prejudice: Zombies?
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:50 AM
6

Are these glowing reviews coming from the same major film reviewers who have started regularly incorporating the Bechdel test in their reviews.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:49 AM
1

The Smurfs 2 got made and that movie just did ok, so it doesn't take much these days. With international numbers it would be hard to actually lose money. The real loss is how much they could have made if they just did it right. They should be up there with some of the marvel franchises.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:40 AM
28

I'm sure there's a lot of second guessing after the opening weekend #'s. A ghostbusters reboot should have been a license to print money. Instead they might not even out gross the original, using non-adjusted 1984 dollars.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 04:34 PM
3

It made $46M despite the user review scores being so heavily manipulated downward, and MRAs staying home and diligently pouring a torrent of shit-talk into the intertubes. For a remake of a classic with a production and marketing budget like they had that's not a great number. This reboot should have easily had an opening weekend or "Pets" or even Zootopia and ideally in the range of some of the marvel comics movies. You can't tell me that when Hollywood execs saw the potential for a ghostbuster…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 02:21 PM
3

It obviously didn't bother him much because he made no attempts to protect himself. So yes, "barely ticked" is appropriate here. That must be why he eventually snapped right? What she did really is irrelevant, the point is that you don't use force like that unless you absolutely need to do so. Teaching her a (much-needed) lesson about not striking anyone doesn't justify brutal retaliation. "Irrelevant", again that is the whole problem, you are minimizing the impact of her actions, again.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 12:03 AM
0

Dude, what is your problem? Simple, that there isn't enough condemnation of her actions.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 11:59 PM
0

They were done in retaliation, which means he has no leg to stand on. Why do you continue to focus on "he has no leg to stand on"?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 11:05 PM
2

Exactly, which is why the article and the headline should be more balanced in condemning them both.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 10:46 PM
6

Did I say anything about women being entitled to hit men? No, that shouldn't be allowed either. No, just like the article didn't say much about that either. That is my point, the primary focus of the article and the sensationalist headline was the harm done to the woman by the man. Men shouldn't have to be punching bags or even forced into retreat into submission just because they are usually bigger and stronger. Both acts of violence should be as strongly denounced. The "Men should NEVER hit ba…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 10:36 PM
1

They were done in retaliation, which means he has no leg to stand on. What is her excuse?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 09:37 PM
5

I honestly don't think if this was anything other than a man hitting a woman it would be described as "Horrific". If this was a man knocking down another man or a woman hitting a woman it would just be a regular tko, probably described with a witty headline. Well that was predictable! Bone-crunching moment bouncer knocks out drunk guy who bets he can dodge his punch http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3594449/Bone-crunching-moment-bouncer-knocks-drunk-guy-bets-dodge-punch.html
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:53 PM
7

They both deserve it... So you agree with me but you're calling me irrational and biased?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:42 PM
3

Again, you are minimizing and excusing the woman's actions. This isn't about defending the man's actions as it is about defending the man's right not to treated like a punching bag in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:17 PM
4

Nobody said only the guy should be punished. The comment I responded to was "Dude deserves jailtime". No mention of anything about the woman. The extent and force of his attack, and the damage caused thereby, may mean that he committed aggravated assault while she committed simple assault. You can't watch that and tell me that the woman wasn't trying to injure the man. She hit him more times over a longer period. There is also to possibility that he may not have been able to think straight becau…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:03 PM
1

Why only the dude?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:56 PM
4

EDIT: and the responses to this comment are why MRAs are seen as a bad joke. All anyone sees is you guys trying to justify beating women. Good luck with that. The tone of the responses here are a direct result of the headline and an article that minimizes any responsibility or obligation of the woman not to physically assault a man. He displays "savagery", her "emotions are divided".
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:28 PM
16

Just teach women not to hit. Just because you are a woman doesn't mean you are entitled to hit men. It is not empowering. If men are expected to show constraint women should as well.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:51 PM
7

And on the side menu there is a story with the headline "Bieber starts fight with 6'5" man."
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:49 PM
2

Because that's apples and oranges tbh. If the billboard depicts a scene from the film then why isn't it relevant?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:44 PM
1

Rihanna Attacked Her Brother With A Glass Bottle Read more at http://www.contactmusic.com/rihanna/news/rihanna-attacked-her-brother-with-a-glass-bottle_1035207#8h3WQs0y3YkF1WZm.99
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:01 AM
1

The choke is a very common theme in comic book covers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_(comics)#/media/File:RogueVs_Warbird.jpg
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:28 PM
2

All homicides are heinous crimes but the types of homicides committed by women rarely involve random victims and hence do not engender community fear. So domestic violence is not a serious offense because the community has nothing to fear. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:09 PM
1

Why would anyone pay one group who brings in significantly less money the same as another group who brings in drastically more? Because it's not "fair". That is seriously the argument they use for tennis prize money.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 03:41 AM
3

Yes, that is all you have to say when they want equal pay for "equal work", "Men get paid more because they are playing men's soccer, you are playing women's soccer, not the same."
/r/MensRights29/05/16 10:17 PM
8

Or lack of fragrance.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 04:02 PM
11

People like dogs. Insufferable gender diversity activists, not so much.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:01 AM
7

I have no problem with boards full of men. "Saying “No” to All-Male Corporate Boards" http://archive.is/YRtPd Its not that the room is full of women it's just another example of hypocrisy on this issue. Why is this a men's right's issue? Because there is pressure for quotas and changes to exclude men from any chances of getting an open position to fill a job with a woman. This is justified by all sorts of nonsense that pics like this prove the people promoting them don't even believe themselves.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 11:19 PM
88

Next time they write an article about the supposed benefits of gender diversity, ask them about this pic celebrating the lack of it. Can These Women Save Silicon Valley? http://archive.is/a0rD3
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:09 PM
4

First off the draft means military service, not necessarily combat roles. And from my military experience I guarantee you that if a woman doesn't want to be in infantry she won't be put in infantry. They just have to fail the physical part or fail to qualify with the rifle and they'll be working in supply or have some other administrative job. No questions asked.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 09:30 PM
1

I didn't say it was right or wrong. Just an observation that at least some women don't feel that getting drinks paid for by strangers is traumatic, it is even desirable.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:19 PM
-4

I never heard that, but back in the day before there were a lot of women in the workforce they probably didn't have a lot of money to spend. I have heard modern day women brag about going out and not having to spend a dime on drinks because guys were buying for them all night.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 03:42 PM
4

Need to send this to may Muslim friends who are concerned about being treated like terrorists. Let them know people's irrational fears about all Muslims being terrorists is really their fault.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 02:17 PM
6

It's a little different because the drink usually comes with the expectations that the woman will at least talk to them man. But this is also a result of our culture that expects men to initiate social contact in these situations.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 02:01 PM
2

"problem" is the word that should be put in quotes. Silicon Valley has thrived for decades with this culture. Now we get women trying to explain how this incredibly successful model is somehow a problem.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:11 AM
1

Not this again. Full-time for these comparisons is defined as any job over 35/week. Most of the wage gap is attributed to men working more hours because.... people who work 40 hours a week generally earn more than people 35 hours a week. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303592404577361883019414296
/r/MensRights30/04/16 09:04 PM
11

Why am I not surprised that there is no outrage about her suggesting that women deserve leave more than men do.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 12:39 AM
0

Here's the type of news where the reckless accusations of a crazy person ruins the claims of future victims in the eyes of the public. First sentence. How about mentioning the real victims, the guys who can't prove their innocence because we always have to "believe women", which threatens their reputations, careers, and even their freedom.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:41 PM
2

Some prostitution supporter groups said the new legislation would provide sex workers with greater powers, and help to encourage the reporting of crimes against them. Wait, but I thought 90% of them were already victims of human trafficking? Why aren't the police rescuing them from this victimization instead of putting them back out there on the street?
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:54 PM
2

The girl told police the first man groped her breast. But Chief David Moore told reporters during a news conference Thursday that additional video doesn't show any evidence the man groped her and that 12 out of 13 witnesses said they didn't see him do anything. And this is the kind of thing that gets counted in some of those popular sexual assault infographs about sexual assaults not being prosecuted by police.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 12:55 AM
2

The first is that in Canada where Ghomeshi was tried there is no statute of limitation on when a case is brought to trial unless it is treason or summary offenses. Obviously they had a trial, the point wasn't that the statute of limitations should have been applied. The point is that statutes of limitations exists in large part because of the difficulty of getting a fair trial after a long period of time. Physical evidence can be lost or destroyed, witnesses can't be found, memories fade, people…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:43 PM
2

There is a reason for the statue of limitations. It is very hard to defend yourself from charges that old, and then these people want you to be able to prove your innocence. Even after all of that if this guy didn't have a record of all that correspondence he may have very well be found guilty.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 04:55 PM
1

If you know of any video regarding the women's prison reform project please post. Be interesting to see if the numbers presented are so frequently challenged for accuracy and clarification.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:45 PM
6

Respect for anyone who wants to at least get the facts straight before determining policy but as this video shows it is often futile. You use false or misleading stats to cause outrage and the politicians want to change the laws. You correct the falsehoods later and everyone admits the facts were wrong BUT we have to change the laws anyway.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:54 PM
6

And they are not the ones facing prosecution.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 02:06 PM
6

Specialized courts are not new in Canada. A number of jurisdictions have specialized domestic-assault courts. There are also specialized First Nations courts, specialized courts for offenders with long-term drug addictions, and specialized courts for those with mental-health issues. Each of these courts are presided over by judges who have a specialized knowledge of offenders or offences in a particular area. I don't know how it is in Canada but in the U.S. special courts like these are too help…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 02:05 PM
4

Some of this is like when African Americans celebrated when OJ was found not guilty after years of feeling black Americans were not treated fairly by the justice system. There have been so many calls to dismiss evidence and only "believe women" that due process was under attack both in the court and in public opinion.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 02:33 AM
3

Sure, head for head in the top 20 men should be paid more based on an economic basis, but should the 70th ranked man earn more than the 1st ranked women even if she pulls in more viewers just because of Federer and co? For some reason Murray leaves out appearance fees. I wonder if these stars who demand equal pay because "We work just a hard" would be willing to spread their appearance fees to the other tour players since viewership and tickets shouldn't influence compensation.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:02 PM
2

Lesson has been unfortunately been lost. Wanting justice and looking at evidence has become "You don't believe rape victims!"
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:48 AM
8

How many men get arrested for defending themselves because society sends women the message that it is OK/funny/empowering to hit men?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:43 AM
5

What a freaking joke. "These women are exploited victims so we can't punish them". If that were true they are basically allowing sex slavery and rape to continue. Then they mention the women who is there because she is providing for her siblings, that is her choice because she has no better options. She is there because of economic circumstances not because she is being sex trafficked.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:24 AM
3

This was the bro, optimally: feeling good in front of an audience, without rhythm, shame or a shirt. This was the bro, suboptimally, too: Gronk’s presumption that his fun is fun for everybody else. This was on a party cruise for bros and babes that wanted to party with Gronk. Now bros can't even party at sea, not hurting anyone, without being told what to do? It’s also odd that ‘‘bro’’ has become a culturally white designation. The word has roots both in the church and as a way that black people…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:57 PM
2

At the very end of the clip the lawyer pretty much verifies with her "Then he's going to jail" comment that it doesn't matter who attacks who first, it is the man who is locked up.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:09 PM
2

And when she said that was the first and only time he ever hit her we had all of the "Always believe women" types saying she was lying.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:43 PM
5

Insurers argue that they are right to charge women more because historically women have filed more disability claims. But there are growing calls to level the playing field Let's just say that this is true, men's higher premiums are justified by claims. It doesn't matter, time to "level the playing field".
/r/MensRights05/03/16 10:49 PM
13

For the exact same work, women earn only 97 cents for every $1 that their male peers do, according to an extensive PayScale study. I give them credit for adding this, although it should be in the first paragraph.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:39 PM
2

The planet belongs to the culture that can "outbreed" the others. I don't think that's necessarily true. India is more populous than the U.S., who has more influence and power around the world. Western civilizations are threatened because much of the rest of the world's population wants to emigrate, and we for the most part let them. Any concerns are dismissed as xenophobia.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 01:43 AM
1

It is a conundrum. Never before has a countries wealth per person increased with a decreasing population. Overall wealth perhaps not, but I don't care about that. What is important is wealth per capita, which btw economists predict will go down in Germany because of all the immigrants. And many times the reason for a decreasing population is people pack up and leave because the economy is already in bad shape. China gives much credit to it's growth to it's one child policy which slowed it's grow…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 01:09 AM
7

Because standing up for men's rights has been distorted to being against women's rights.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 12:30 AM
5

Maybe without having to compete with so many people for jobs, including millions of immigrants, raises will rise. Wouldn't hurt if housing costs fall a lot too without so many people competing for limited supply. I never bought the argument that we need a continuously growing population, now that is what is unsustainable.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:44 PM
6

Western Society is not sustainable. Sure it is. Just because the population might drop doesn't mean it isn't unsustainable. Were people looking around 40 years ago thinking, "Boy there sure aren't enough people around."? How many more people do we have today than 40 years ago?
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:40 PM
4

"nobody's ever raised a question about that." This is a retarded statement. Plenty of people have been complaining about it. She's too old and needs to go.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 01:38 AM
17

"It is taking me a bit of time to work out how this result will change girls' perceptions of Stem." It is a welcoming environment and if a girl does win she will know it is only because she is shielded from competition from boys.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:44 PM
4

There have been a lot of people asking "If he didn't do it why hasn't her sued her?" Well here you go, he did, a couple years ago.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 03:21 PM
1

I still disagree. Our laws are written to apply to everyone. Not only would you then have to prove the case in court, you would have to prove that the abuse actually happened. Otherwise tons of people will just use it as an excuse. This does happen now, its a theoretical question. Probably the most famous recent case is the affluenza kid.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:23 AM
1

Are we going to give get out of jail free cards for anyone who had it tough growing up? Absolutely not. But it could be something to take into consideration under certain circumstances.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:36 AM
1

Its not just that you can't blame the upbringing, it may be true that this girl has serious problems. It is the presumption that she must have been abused and is therefore a victim and any punishment for her part on throwing 5 boys in jail can't even be considered.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:59 PM
4

I checked their methodology and they make no attempt to account for false accusations unless those lead to a conviction for perjury Which are almost never pursued in rape cases. This seems like an open and shut case with video and confession. I don't know why she and her father are not being held accountable for putting those boys through this. This is outrageous.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:11 PM
6

She refused to testify against those kids. Only after the cops pressed her about the inconsistencies in her stories, eye witness accounts, and phone video.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:26 PM
15

She was 18. Do you think her father started having sex with her just in this year? "The woman had only recently reconnected with her father through Facebook." http://nypost.com/2016/02/24/charges-dropped-against-teens-in-brooklyn-park-gang-rape/ The girl is statistically likely to be a victim of a lifetime of abuse and conditioning. These posts of "OMG SHE LAIUR!" are pathetic. Ah the "statically likely" argument. What statics are these? How about you look at the facts instead of made up "stats"…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:57 PM
1

Read most feminist articles and the use of the word disproportionately is used at least 20 times. It is easy to see how the intern got confused.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:11 PM
1

And they don't even like that: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/
/r/MensRights24/02/16 05:22 PM
9

Bah, this is only under oath in a court of law. The real trial takes place on twitter.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:49 PM
1

The guy's rank is PFC which is only 1 rank above private. If you walk around most any base you won't find any real privates outside of bootcamp, so PFC is as low as it gets.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:02 AM
1

Report it, yes. but what is the attitude of the people who he is reporting it to? Some moron is going to tell him to "Be a man.". Those are the kinds of attitudes the poster is trying to address.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:20 PM
1

Look at the rank on his collar.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:22 PM
2

Men have been killed because of lies about rape. This is why we need trials.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:29 PM
9

Yet another story to link to the next time some idiot asks "Why do we need men's rights?". Domestic violence call, throw the man in jail, no investigation needed.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:03 PM
133

Always believe women! They are only capable of lying when they say they haven't been abused.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:23 PM
3

"Consent is not obtainable if there is any kind of coercion present, including force (physical, emotional, verbal, etc.), manipulation, blackmail, pressure, abuse of power relationships, or any combination thereof. Power relationships can exist due to formal hierarchical relationships and/or power dynamics implicit in social systems (including, but not limited to, institutional sexism, cissexism, heterosexism, racism, colonialism, classism, and ableism)." So pretty much any consent not obtained …
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:30 PM
3

In the EU, as in most places, "Gender" really means women. Laws that are unfair to men are of no concern.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:19 PM
11

Don't worry the EU has a Gender Equality Commission. I'm sure they'll be all over this.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 07:37 PM
25

Stephen Fry has been widely accused of misogyny after he described costume designer Jenny Beavan as dressing like a “bag lady” during Sunday night's Baftas award show. How is this "misogyny"?
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:42 PM
3

I'll bet they photoshopped away the stretch marks. Stretch marks aren't sexy?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:21 AM
10

There aren't many "stick figures" in the SI swim suit issue, those are mostly runway models. I didn't hear any complaints from men about Kate Upton being in the issue.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:20 PM
3

And they don't understand why men don't like to be around them - proving their IQ is not that high afterall. It's not just IQ. We all protect ourselves from rejection a bit by deflecting blame to external factors. It's much harder to say "I'm the problem" than it is to say "People have a problem with one of my positive traits." I know this because women won't date me because I'm my life is too exciting (translation: get arrested a lot)
/r/MensRights10/02/16 06:35 PM
3

Affirmative consent won't solve this. We will get the "I only said Yes because of rape consent neurosis syndrome." excuses.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:57 PM
4

Wonder if they have gender quotas for nursing job applicants
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:23 PM
2

This is nonsense. You talk about women in tech you want to talk to the people who hire tech positions, which are mostly men who run successful companies. Sorry but a lot of the "problem" is that women may have to change, they shouldn't expect that the industry that is thriving just the way it is change because of the "problem" of women in tech. This is a made up societal justice problem not an actual industry problem.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:05 AM
12

Impossible. I was assured by feminists that women and girls NEVER lie about rape, and because of this there is no need for due process in rape cases.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:54 AM
-1

How is "overwhelmingly female" a noun?
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:12 AM
-5

Overwhelmingly female Diversity is not what I was questioning. Your definition, "Overwhelmingly female" is not a noun. Zebra Noun Has stripes. Zebra is a noun but has stripes is not.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:10 AM
-3

adjective phrase?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:46 PM
-3

Not to be that guy, but that's not really a noun.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:31 PM
1

Comment on site by Yokio pretty much sums it up.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 03:23 PM
10

I'm surprised there are federal prisons for juveniles.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:53 PM
4

It's a very soul-searching experience to know someone holds your life in their hands and will end it over the petty cash in your wallet. The post I responded to did not mention any concerns about a physical threat, just caught a neighbor kid stealing some mints and a pen from his car. Armed robbery is a different matter. Sounded like the officer was surprised that the guy had the opportunity to kill legally someone and didn't take it.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:31 PM
1

All I know is he did the right thing. I don't see female privilege here. What is the "right thing"? Not hitting her because she is a woman, that is the privilege right there.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:06 PM
18

The responding officer said it was felony burglary, that I had him "dead to rights" and asked me why I didn't shoot the criminal. I hope you answered. "Because I'm not a psychopath who executes people for burglary and the law isn't the only thing that keeps me from killing people."
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:01 PM
19

I know what you are trying to say but Muhammad Ali is elderly and has advanced Parkinsons.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:57 PM
84

And if she decided to have sex with someone she'd be the helpless victim.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:09 PM
3

It is hard to make a firm judgement without knowing the qualifications broken down by gender of applicant. Although I suspect it is not the case it is possible that only the best qualified female students apply to these schools and thus have a higher acceptance rate.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:35 PM
1

Not surprising. Most support for diversity come from people who support it when it affects other people's positions. You start talking about diversifying the board it becomes a "burden".
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:51 PM
5

"Men do not need—nor would they get—the benefits women gain from a Chic CEO women’s networking event." How about you let men be the judge of that for themselves.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 04:35 PM
1

....contingency planning for intensified resistance to mass deportations of immigrants Wait a minute, if white men are so bad why are all these immigrants coming to countries run and built primarily by the white man?
/r/MensRights24/12/15 05:20 PM
3

Production costs aren't the only costs. You watch any show that has even a sliver of a female audience and you will see all of the hair care ads. There are so many products companies have to spend a ton in marketing to get women to buy theirs. And if you price something too low a lot of women will think that it is a sign of poor quality. A lot of men will just buy whatever is on sale or has 25% free. Except of the morons who think axe body spray will get them more action.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:59 PM
1

There are very logical reasons to exclude all Muslims but that would be impolitic. That is why it is a men's rights issue. It shouldn't be acceptable to tolerate discrimination against men any more than it is for any other group.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 11:02 PM
1

And unless you have a real grip as to why men without families are at the back of the line for this initiative, then commenting about it is just blowing a horn for no reason. I have a "real grip", and that grip wouldn't be an option if we were talking about any other group because it would be unacceptable to discriminate against them. But are we going to ask follow up or critical questions? Apparently nah. What makes you think we aren't?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 11:00 PM
1

The crushing majority of jihadists posing as refugees are single Muslim men. Now you are guilty of hate speech.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:45 PM
3

No ones deeming them second class citizens. Telling them they are different rules for them than for everyone else qualifies as making them 2nd class. And then what happens. Nobody will take them in legally so they are forced to illegally sneak into other countries where they really are 2nd class. Then people will wondered how they become easy targets for those who are seeking to radicalize marginalized young men.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:13 PM
12

But this issue is not a men's rights battleground. A process that puts men at the back of the line is a men's rights battleground.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:38 PM
1

From your link: "Those are where priorities are but we haven't said that we're not taking any single men, it's just that those other cases are going to the top of the list," Tunis told The Canadian Press in an interview." Top of the list? So how exactly is this going to work. Do they think they will run out of women, children, and families who want to flee to Canada and then they will let in single men?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:34 PM
3

That depends on what you mean by problem. Yes, a more of the young single men will end up committing crimes, becoming drug addicts, etc. and there will be costs associated with that. But pretty much every single child will need to be educated, that alone will costs much more than what any problems caused by a small % of men.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:53 PM
9

A drain on society? Yes women and children make very little use of government services.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 02:49 PM
7

If a nation intends to appear sympathetic to the "plight" of the refugees without completely throwing the door open to terrorists the logical thing to do is to allow women and children in while excluding military aged men. I think the children of these immigrants are just as likely if not more likely to grow up and become radicalized than the actual immigrants themselves. And besides that, once again discrimination against men becomes the only form of acceptable discrimination. Can't only accept…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 02:06 PM
6

"That will now become illegal in 2014, after the ACA is fully implemented. Insurers will no longer have free reign to charge women whatever they like for no discernable reason." This is the kind of nonsense that goes around unchallenged at makes women believe that are somehow being victimized by the patriarchy. However even when maternity costs are excluded women use more health services. http://healthblog.ncpa.org/should-women-pay-higher-premiums-for-health-insurance/ Then they go make ignorant…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:48 AM
11

And they aren't even allowed to charge women more in premiums to cover these costs. Men end up having to subsidize the costs.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:07 PM
2

Bookmark for the next time someone asks "Why do we need men's rights?"
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:08 PM
5

Not in the military. You can't be deployed while pregnant. And there is a long list of jobs you can't do because of exposure to chemicals, excessive vibration, and so on. You think they are going to let a pregnant woman try to squeeze in and out of a tank?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:40 PM
39

"You're too fat" "That's rude." "Not rude I just say it as it is."
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:18 AM
4

There's nothing to debate and the fact that you think there is shows that you're a fucking idiot. Good bye. I see. Name call, downvote, and then run off to your safe space. No wonder you are laughed at. You make me sad.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 02:51 AM
4

A+ shit posting, just like most of this sub. Another brilliant comment. You have something intelligent to say, come on with it, always glad to engage in debate. Otherwise we'll just write you off as another moron.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 02:44 AM
3

...get a fucking grip That's the most intelligent comment you can make? No wonder you are laughed at. You make me sad.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 02:29 AM
4

Headline will be interpreted by many as meaning women are working more in paid work and still being paid less. If this situation is similar to the U.S. the main reason they are being paid less is because they are working fewer hours at paid jobs. And if that is the case it doesn't seem unreasonable that they are responsible for more housework.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:44 PM
2

I don't really are for his act.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:18 AM
2

There are all kinds of factors that influence pay. They use the figures that don't control for any of those to make the gap seem as large as possible. And what is worse many times they make it seems like the uncontrolled numbers they present are for the same number of hours in the same type of work, they are deliberately misleading people.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:14 AM
4

"Women in the United States are paid less for equal work than men in all industries and a new report released on Thursday showed the widest discrepancy in wages is between married men and women with children. Fathers earned the highest overall median salaries at about $67,900, compared to $46,800 for married mothers, and single women with children had the lowest median salary at $38,200." The first paragraph mentions equal work and then, without clarifying, the 2nd paragraph they use the uncontr…
/r/MensRights07/11/15 10:13 PM
2

The first part was going to be about the origin and repetition of the myth. http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/08/gender_pay_gap_the_familiar_line_that_women_make_77_cents_to_every_man_s.html
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:49 PM
1

The article is really about victim blaming - the unconscious tendency to view rape of women firstly as an issue with women failing to be careful. The article is about a women incorrectly thinking that crime prevention is victim blaming. She uses an analogy about arson and claims you never see that kind of logic applied to that kind of crime and yet: http://www.sfm.illinois.gov/Public/Arson-Prevention
/r/MensRights05/11/15 10:20 PM
1

No mean reminding them of the personal responsibility when they arrive having being abused, calling out their alleged failure to minimize their risk. That is not what is happening in the article, police are passing along crime prevention advice. Say someone was passed out and a woman raped them. I got no problem warning men that if the pass out they are vulnerable to crimes.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:58 PM
3

Do you think that when men turn up here having been falsely accused or abused by a woman, that we should start blaming them as we argue should happen when its women, to remind them of their personal responsibility? If by that you mean advising men how not to become victims in the first place, like this: http://www.avoiceformen.com/miscellaneous/how-to-avoid-a-false-rape-claim/ Prevention advice is not the same as "blaming" them.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:53 PM
2

I've never seen seen any police advice telling men they shouldnt walk alone where they live and have to travel, despite more random violence against men. "In all but one case the victim was alone when robbed, and most were shown a weapon. Sixteen of those victims were male, and most were either just leaving or returning to their homes when the robbery occurred." "The Third Precinct is adding extra patrols and enforcement in the area, but remind residents to be aware of their surroundings and not…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:33 PM
1

Irrelevant. Ive never been filmed changing either. Then again, I work in IT, where that doesn't happen. What if your boss told you or your wife that you would now be required to be filmed while you are changing, or find another career. Whether or not media is allowed in the locker room is up to the organization that governs the sport. You have to ask why is it allowed in some cases, almost exclusively in men's sports, and not others if it is supposedly so important to the fans? Same with NBA/WNB…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 08:46 PM
1

Sure they do, but this isn't discrimination any more than black lung is. I may be wrong but I honestly cannot ever recall seeing video of a female athlete being interviewed while changing in the locker room. You'd think if this was as essential to the fan experience as claimed you'd see more interviews of Alex Morgan wrapped in a towel answering questions while surrounded by reporters. You shouldn't employers have a take it or leave it approach to working conditions. "Don't like not being paid f…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 08:09 PM
2

Again, if you dont like it, dont play in the fucking NFL. You can say that about any working condition in any job. "Don't like black lung disease don't be a coal miner" That's not a productive answer to improving working conditions. Whether it is locker room media policy or concussions workers have a right to speak up about things they don't like.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:08 PM
8

“Imagine a woman engineer actually knowingly and willingly tricking that technology, when she might be thinking of the allergens put into the environment and the eyes of the child that might get irritated by 40 times the legal output of diesel - particularly when it’s not allowable by law,” said Naughton. Does she have some inside knowledge? How does she know a female engineer(s) or software developer didn't take part in designing or approval of the the emissions cheating systems? And BTW here i…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:08 PM
2

Another point that isn't talked about is that the during the fappening and such there was all this wailing about "You looking at these pictures mean you hate women!"
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:08 PM
6

I remember this from a few months ago, better article here: http://gothamist.com/2015/05/28/manspreading_crackdown.php Yes, they are citing women for having their feet on seats and such, but still the term "manspreading" is used giving the impression that men are the main problem.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:31 PM
2

How many immature young men date, and have consensual sex with, teenage girlfriends, and end up serving jail time. No questions asked about their maturity level or whether or not the teenager enjoyed it. It is "She can't consent because of her age, case closed." https://prezi.com/nfmcjxc9pkrr/gender-bias-in-statutory-rape/
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:06 PM
6

Rousey deserves to get paid, not because she's a woman but because of her draw. Everyone else, men and women, are on a case by case basis. No you don't deserve more money because Rousey can draw.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:08 PM
79

"Women do a better job," Peña said bluntly. "We draw more, we're more exciting, we have 10 times more heart, we don't quit. Won't quit? Most of Ronda's wins are from submission in less than a minute.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 05:04 PM
3

What Birger calls a "musical chairs" of the heart: As the men pair off with partners, unpartnered straight women are left with fewer and fewer options—and millions of them are eventually left with no options at all. No options at all, well expect marry carpenter, electrician, fireman, chef, enlisted man, mechanic, etc.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:49 PM
2

Feminists should be happy, didn't Miss Piggy repeatedly commit domestic violence? Unless of course they only think domestic violence is only bad when it is violence against women. Nah.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 10:39 PM
8

Let's see if they come out and deny the specifics of treatment detailed in the article. Not, “The five-mile run is still five miles. The 12-mile march is still 12 miles.”. If they answer the direct questions like that you know something is up.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:41 PM
23

The women didn't want or ask for special treatment, says one who attempted the program. I'm noticing the lack of words synonymous of "get" and "receive".
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:27 PM
1

Women are the ones taught that they have a right to be violent against men and not be punished for it.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 06:51 PM
2

RAY MABUS: A more diverse force is a stronger force. A more diverse mindset makes you a stronger force. If you have the same outlook, if you have the same mindset, you don't get much innovation. There is no evidence of this, but since he is so sure of this any facts that are presented that challenge this are dismissed. Then he goes on to complain about the Marine Corps being closed minded MABUS: It started out with a fairly large component of the men thinking this is not a good idea and women wi…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:09 PM
18

When someone becomes so bitter and jaded that when she sees a gesture of affection and love she interprets it as an attempt to display ownership it may be time to ask yourself if you want to end up like her.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:04 PM
2

That does remind me of women demanding to be admitted into all men private golf clubs.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:47 AM
1

I do however agree with the majority opinion on this thread that it doesn't matter "who has it worse." Yes, there is always someone who has it worse, a quadriplegic has it much worse than a middle class white woman complaining that the government won't pay for her birth control. That's not the point. As seen in the reasons you listed there are plenty of areas where men do indeed have it worse but unless someone speaks out, many of these issues will continue to be ignored, "That's just the way it…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:08 AM
1

When is the last time you heard of a male only networking event?
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:02 AM
3

According to George Stephan, a lawyer who specializes in discrimination law and has faced off against Rava in past cases, many lawsuits under the Unruh Act are used to attack the same people the law was created to protect. Yes, the law was designed to protected the fundamental rights of women to get into nightclubs for free while men had to pay.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 04:28 PM
5

For child support it is does not matter in some states whether or not the husband (Griner in this case) had anything to do with the pregnancy or not. A child that is conceived during the marriage is considered a product of the marriage. So you end up with fathers paying child support for kids conceived while the wife was unfaithful.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 01:32 PM
3

Maybe she was talking while trying to dodge sniper fire or while writing to NASA. I can't blame her for being a little confused.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:38 PM
1

I don't think I should be fired. Well that's what happened to Rice. He was suspended. IK was fired but was hired to play on another team, that's what the tread is about, should the league take penalize IK for breaking Geno's jaw?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 03:04 AM
2

Ray Rice assaulted his fiancee at the time (now wife, they married 6 weeks after that event), after she assaulted him. Yes, just like Geno got hit after he taunted IK. If the NFL was consistent they should have penalized both for not walking away instead of throwing a punch. That is where the discussion of the thread is going.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 01:27 AM
1

Just posting for discussion, isn't that what reddit is for?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:54 PM
2

"Broke" not broke. I'm not broke, in fact I'm pretty well off but I couldn't come up with $900k.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:19 PM
-1

Did you see the Ray Rice video? His wife was up in his face and spit on him. Still not an excuse to the NFL.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:58 PM
0

How many young men get "popped" for similar kinds of disagreements. And by popped I mean with a firearm. If coming down hard on players for domestic violence is supposedly needed because it sends a message why don't they do the same where to send a message against other forms of violence prevalent in our society.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:16 PM
2

Chivalry isn't dead. Act like a lady and you'll be treated like a lady. Act rude with a nasty, boorish attitude and you'll get treated like you deserve to be treated.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:02 PM
5

Haven't seen to movie, probably won't but things like this make it seem like visitations are for the father's benefit. Like there is no benefit to the child with having a relationship with the father.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:23 PM
3

If this happens then I'm sure our business leaders and politicians will be trampling over each other to get to the press conference mic first to denounce these gender imbalances just like they do for the lack of women in silicon valley, right?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:40 PM
1

And there's quite a lot of user error. Doesn't matter whose fault it is, since the user is now the cashier since "automation" in the case really means making the shopper do most of the work of the cashier and bagger. It still causes problems.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:34 PM
14

In short, today’s typical women’s work is what will predominate in future. On a mass scale, this pattern may result in an involuntary shift in the division of labor, with husbands tending to household duties after dropping their wives off at the office. This is such nonsense. It assumes that what is considered "women's work" must be done by women because that is the way it is now. If jobs start to dry up you can be sure more men will move into other fields.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 07:44 PM
2

Seems like the only enforcement is from social pressure. Can anyone from Germany or who is familiar with the situation comment on the compliance with these marked spaces.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 11:47 PM
1

And then she'll demand the heat get turned up to 85 in the store because she's cold or else sexism.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:01 PM
1

Because our workers are our citizens and legal residents and as such our laws should help provide them with a work environment with 1st world standards.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:17 PM
1

So all those laborers have to (willingly) work under the table. Because they come from some of the poorest countries in the hemisphere. Our workers shouldn't have to compete in a labor market flooded with 3rd world workers.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:57 PM
19

Don't let this guy fool you. Anything sort of giving all these women amnesty is his goal. They want their court dates to drag on for years and then if they disappear when they get their removal orders, "We can't deport mothers of U.S. citizens! They have deep roots in the community!" They even complain about the ankle bracelets. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/ice-is-fitting-immigrant-mothers-with-ankle-monitors-when-they-arrive-in-new-york-6662610
/r/MensRights25/07/15 01:03 AM
4

These methods have proved effective as well. In 2013, one pilot program testing such alternatives reported a 99% appearance rate at immigration court hearings among participants, and 79% compliance rate for removal orders. 79% compliance is a success story?
/r/MensRights24/07/15 11:29 PM
3

ny mag would print something that was made up would they? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/19/bloomberg-jessica-pressler_n_6348348.html
/r/MensRights17/07/15 10:03 PM
5

Yes. He is afraid of losing his wife so he agrees to an open marriage. he is trying to justify it to himself by trying to turn it into something noble by claiming it is feminism.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:17 PM
6

In the actual article he explains that he also takes on other lovers but not as frequently. I don't understand where he gets this patriarchy nonsense from as most wives would not desire their husbands to be sleeping around. What is a women's motivation?
/r/MensRights17/07/15 05:38 PM
1

But it might not require hormone shots if it was not a physical problem.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:42 PM
1

Was she having problems conceiving?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:08 PM
8

Glory isn't even gay. As soon as they got married she ran off to get the fertility center to be impregnated. She just played Griner for the $.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:45 PM
7

In many states if the child is conceived during the marriage the child is considered a product of the marriage. Men get forced into paying child support for kids conceived when their wife cheats on them. Doesn't matter because it is "In the best interest of the child."
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:37 PM
2

The whole point of insurance is to create a socialist system of spreading out the costs of aspects of our society that have a huge variance. That is not insurance that is just paying taxes and fees for medical care. Insurance is based on risk vs premiums.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:21 AM
5

Car insurance has nothing to do with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness Neither are razor blades but that doesn't stop them from endless whining about paying more.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:58 PM
4

Yes, she understands how insurance works when it comes to car insurance, but when confronted with the facts about health insurance the fact go out the window, "Do you want to live in a country where women pay more them men for health insurance?"
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:49 PM
1

What exactly is the logic fallacy you claim is there?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 02:28 AM
4

You guys are fucking idiots. People spend their lives studying this shit, and you read an article from ABC and think you can all sum it all up in a little comment on reddit. Since you don't seem to understand the obvious point maybe you shouldn't be calling other people idiots. Why are you guys so hell bent on saying sexism doesn't exist? Where did you draw this conclusion from? Nobody is saying sexism doesn't exist. Read the article, see how they present some possible reasons for the pay discre…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 11:45 PM
5

No, it's like saying not every case of pay disparity is due to discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 11:17 PM
5

The men's game was seen by almost a billion people worldwide.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:55 PM
8

Article is 2 years old but you'll see that they make an honest attempt at offering the facts and reasonable explanations. This is unlike many of the pay gap article regarding men and women's world cup teams. No mention in the vast differences in revenues. for example: http://espn.go.com/espnw/news-commentary/2015worldcup/article/13217275/not-even-world-cup-champs-avoid-pay-gap
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:10 PM
3

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jun/21/barack-obama/barack-obama-ad-says-women-are-paid-77-cents-dolla/
/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:03 PM
1

It's not necessary, it's pandering.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:44 PM
24

The sub set demographic of women who show up for this promotion probably earn more than men. But since they insists on using the 77% figure, facts don't matter to them anyway.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 01:16 PM
1

Honestly, it's not really sexist. At least not from a business perspective. That's not the really the point. The pay gap is ok when women earn more because their are valid reasons, when men earn more their is no justification, they say it must be due to sexism.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:57 PM
1

Most major news media have entertainment sections.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:56 AM
5

I think we'd be seeing a much different reaction from the media. I don't know. Women's wardrobe malfunctions are pretty widely reported.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:27 PM
4

On the face this may seem trivial but look at what this manufactured "manspreading" phenomenon is actually doing. Do you really think men are solely responsible for taking up multiple seats on public transportation? This should not be a gender based issue. If someone only jumped on minorities for a rude public behavior there would be calls to charge them with a hate crime and there certainly wouldn't be a fluff piece in the MSM about it.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:07 PM
3

The report has several examples of people, both male and female, being arrested for having things or body parts on seats. I don't know how they determined that what happened to these 2 guys qualifies as "man-spreading" and the others don't.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:19 PM
7

I think this is from Canada, they may misrepresent a different statistic.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 06:58 PM
8

Manspreading, right. Shameful that they they continue to spread this sexist label. Additional details from linked article: "A young African-American woman, a student at LaGuardia College, had three punitive interactions with NYPD officers in a year's time: the first was a summons for swiping her school MetroCard on Memorial Day; next was another summons, this time for having her foot on a subway seat;..." "At 2:30 in the morning at the Canal Street station in downtown Manhattan, police officers …
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:12 PM
1

Even if the woman doesn't want them locked up. But she couldn't possibly know what is best for herself and her family because the moment she gets hit by a man, a woman transforms into a "battered woman" who is so psychologically damaged she can no longer be trusted to make decisions.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:39 PM
1

You are asking about ideal situations and expectations but I'm telling you about reality. Should teachers have sex with students? No, but it happens.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:40 AM
3

I expected r/MensRights to actually applaud the US military for providing paternity leave. 10 day Paternity leave happened years ago, this article is about the Military Opportunities for Mothers (MOM) Act. We will applaud if it is a MOP(Parent) act that doesn't treat fathers as second class caregivers.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:26 AM
13

Assistant to the dorm manager.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:32 AM
26

And when they spend half their career as a barracks liaison they blame sexism when they don't get promoted as quickly as men with the same time in service.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:18 AM
2

Unless raped, why are soldiers even having sex while deployed in a war zone? Is sexual relationships with other soldiers allowed? Because they are young people and that is what happens sometimes. Yes sexual relationships are allowed but you can get in trouble for fraternization (having a relationship with someone of much lower rank) and adultery.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:08 PM
10

They'll go crazy if you start kicking women out for getting pregnant. And while I can't confirm it, when I was in I heard if a woman was pregnant, especially if she was single, she could request a hardship discharge and it was automatically granted. They military knew what kind of liability to readiness that causes. But now readiness takes a back seat to the undefinable benefits of diversity.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:06 PM
5

"We can think of no greater deterrent to women contemplating a military career than the image of a pregnant woman being severely punished simply for conceiving a child," the senators wrote to Cucolo today. "This defies comprehension. As such, we urge you to immediately recind this policy." http://abcnews.go.com/WN/general-backs-off-threat-court-martial-pregnant-soldiers/story?id=9399604
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:21 PM
1

This is one area where there will generally be an inequality because of the physical inequalities of male and female bodies. Women need more time off after giving birth than men, because men do not give birth. This is more about child care than physical recovery after giving birth. I also don't think that poor maternity leave policies are what's keeping women out of the military.. It's also about retention, which is a huge issue when women become mothers especially the more skilled ones who have…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:28 PM
231

“[W]e need more women in the Navy and Marine Corps; not simply to have more women, but because a more diverse force is a stronger force,” Stronger force? When I was in the military if a woman got pregnant she was assigned to light duty. Depending on her MOS (her military job) they may mean she was unable to perform many or most of her job requirements and means she is not deployable. Then she would go on maternity leave and come back still on light duty for months. So she was basically not at fu…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:49 PM
15

Insecure.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:45 PM
1

People do most of their growing in childhood. If you want to blame someone blame the people who are responsible for feeding you, which most of the time is the mom.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:53 PM
1

It's not unfair, it's just retarded. He can pull supermodels because he's a rich and famous movie star which for a lot of women more than makes up for his average physique.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 07:42 PM
1

A feminist that demands everyone think like her? That's the first time I've seen that.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 07:39 PM
4

"By one estimate.." Weasel tactic especially when they don't even reference who made that estimate or link to it. Common practice for people who want to manipulate statics. They do this a lot with the wage gap stats too, "One commonly cited number is 76 cents for every dollar..."
/r/MensRights09/05/15 01:59 PM
2

Because what often happens in practice is that the extra space comes at the expense of the men's room or the number of men's rooms. If there are 2 men's and 2 women's rooms they convert so there are 3 women's and 1 men's. So men have to wait longer or walk up 2 floors to find a bathroom so women can have shorter wait times.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:22 PM
2

But who is harmed by allocating a larger fraction of space to women's washrooms than men's? Men. Where do you think the extra space usually comes from?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:58 PM
1

But look at the article the thread is linked to and how the subject of starting a women's only company is treated.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:34 PM
0

Even this site establishes the link. Q: What role does alcohol play in campus sexual assault? Alcohol is the most widely used date-rape drug; 89 percent of assaults occur when the survivor is incapacitated due to alcohol. Sexual assault is never the fault of survivors, regardless of whether they were using drugs or alcohol (voluntarily or against their will). Use of alcohol or drugs by perpetrators is no excuse for their actions. http://www.aauw.org/resource/campus-sexual-assault-talking-points/
/r/MensRights01/05/15 07:30 PM
1

I'm not seeing the relation to the "science" stuff.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 07:23 PM
1

WTF is going on here?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:35 PM
6

That's kind of the definition of sexism. But in media speak sexism means sexism against women and the author is trying to establish if this assertion actually harms women.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:28 PM
10

I obviously can't go into the details now because I have no way of verifying your gender, you may be a sneaky female. Meet me later at the Fortress of Privilege and I'll hook you up.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 11:22 PM
6

All the male ones go to athletes so they need to make up reasons to give out female ones (and there's far less female sports than male sports). Your sister is incorrect. Athletic scholarships have to be roughly equal to enrollment % for both men and women.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 07:41 PM
1

Check everything off that you think you can convincingly lie about. But that's not the point anyway, he shouldn't have to lie, the aid should be given based on need/circumstances not gender.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:48 PM
20

Don't fake or lie about anything, it could get you kicked out of school. Apply for the single mother aid and write a note about how as a single dad you face all the same challenges that single mothers do and that your child's well being is just as dependent on you receiving educational opportunity as it would be if you were a mom. If they deny you because you are a man you can take it next level. I know most people don't want to get involved to that level, and I wouldn't blame you if you didn't,…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:14 PM
426

Just use some of the money in your male privileged trust fund all boys get when they are born. If that is not enough cash in some of your patriarchy bonds.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 02:52 PM
1

Yes, but being innocent doesn't automatically mean they can prove the charges are false.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 09:39 PM
1

... they find out that she falsely accused him of rape AND there was conspiracy with two other individual to get him arrested for a crime that never happened and there are no repercussions for this?? They did not find that he had been falsely accused. He was not found guilty of the accusations but that is not the same as proving that the accusations were false.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:34 PM
13

The guy who is calling the story fake though.. doesn't have any facts at all. He questions missing elements of the story that are standard journalism, like writing that you made good efforts to give the accused a chance to tell their sides of the story. For that he got called an idiot.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:55 PM
6

She said she was wrong in this case. Be nice if she admitted she and the others who left equally harsh comments in the comments section rushed to judgement because they were blinded by bias.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:18 PM
6

It's one thing to think other people are wrong, her actions were completely unprofessional.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:02 PM
4

Men may also be more willing to relocate. Women also have shown to prefer non-pay benefits more than men. For example they may value more vacation time and flexible hours.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:24 PM
3

"The study found that students in all-girls schools were slightly less likely to take math or science courses. Given the fact that such courses open the door to lucrative careers in science, technology, engineering, and math, or STEM, fields, this fact is disturbing. " http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/02/17/21barnett.h31.html
/r/MensRights17/04/15 08:08 PM
4

If a robot is going to take my job the least it can do is put out.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:47 PM
4

Misremembered, just like Brian Williams
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:31 PM
101

“Efforts to combat formerly widespread sexism in hiring appear to have succeeded,” Your results tell a different story, or is sexism not a problem when men are the victims?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 11:30 PM
3

Most of the tween shows on the Disney channel and Nickelodeon are worse. The order of authority is: Mom>Grandma>teen daughter>clueless dad.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:13 PM
1

I know when people refer to "Asians" Indians don't usually come to mind but India is in Asia.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:46 PM
1

Did I say I want everyone to make the same pay? Yes. "It should come down to a math formula. X input, Y output, Z time calculated into a rate of compensation."
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:42 PM
2

We have progressed far enough to measure everything very accurately. No we haven't. Plenty of jobs don't have concrete outputs. People who feel fairly compensated for their work work harder and are happier. Just because somebody makes more than you doesn't mean you aren't being fairly compensated. Market conditions can change. Do you want people who are working to take pay cuts because there is a recession and new people can be hired for less, just because you want everyone to make the same pay?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:39 PM
5

Which is why this kind of stuff should be regulated. Compensation for time should be based on production output. Right, and for that the company will pay the lowest rate possible. With the current system we end up with way too many highly paid, low output people and many underpaid, high output people. I think you feel that the high paid people are somehow harming the low paid people. Like they are higher paid at the expense of the lower paid people, this is usually not necessarily the case.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:30 PM
3

You shouldn't get more money because you happen to be an extrovert and better at social interactions with the boss. What if I'm just in a stronger position to negotiate. Like I have another job offer. The company is always going to try and get away with the lowest salary they can get away with. Why mess with negotiations just because it might mean someone has it better than you at the expense of the company?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:45 PM
3

As much as I agree, to be intellectually honest, I feel it necessary to ask why is it always white men. In tech it may very well be an Asian person.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:18 PM
14

She's trying to hire candidates that believe in the company's mission and that will mesh well with the working culture. Wasn't that what she sued about? People who didn't mesh well with the working culture were being unfairly excluded?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:12 PM
1

Probably like a lot of government positions. This is the salary for this position. If you think it is too low don't apply.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:09 PM
6

I'm making the point that you can show it can work if you do it intelligently. I know where you are coming from, but that doesn't seem to be priority. Making sure that the hiring process is fair, and identifies the best candidates should be the goal. Here it seems like they are deciding on the desirable demographics of their workforce before they even know who they will have apply for jobs.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:47 PM
65

And people who do get hired are going to have the fight the stigma of being a quota filler.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:24 PM
32

I'm sure you can find plenty of examples of "diverse" teams that produce great results, just like you can find examples of great results achieved with a homogeneous team. The question is what difference, if any, does it make.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:11 PM
11

It's not an issue of homogeneity.... Has this ever been established? I'm certainly not saying if is the major factor in success but we are always sold on the benefits of diversity, is it possible that sometimes having a homogeneous workforce can be advantageous.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:55 PM
139

Is there any real evidence that a lack of diversity in certain positions is a hindrance to a tech company? A lot of organizations seem to be wildly successful without it. Could homogeneity even be considered a strength? Or can we even ask that question?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:51 PM
5

Didn't the White House basically issue a memo or something that said that they retract this statement? Not that I am aware of.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:56 PM
12

One if the things that is always identified as a factor in the wage gap is women interrupting their careers for raising children. If they are going to pull stuff like this and only provide transition support for women they are only going to further influence the decision that the mom stays home and dads continue to work
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:05 PM
2

"Take cross country runs, for example, we had to wear horrible, blue knickers and a polo shirt to do them. The smallest uniform for the coldest weather: what's that about? " Smallest uniforms? For swimming we got to wear speedos for the swimming unit which was in January. Air and water in pool were freezing.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:29 PM
25

Builds character.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:56 PM
12

Yes, the things she pointed out could certainly apply to boys as well.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:12 PM
2

Since almost all the media outlets are crediting this case with "bringing about discussion about gender issues" I wonder if any of them will raise this question, "Are many of the claims of discrimination women feel in the workplace unfounded and due more to performance?"
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:29 PM
9

This was going on before she came over. And it is far from a reddit problem, most mainstream media sites are the same way "Ellen Pao's suit was wake-up call for Silicon Valley" http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/03/27/ellen-pao-kleiner-perkins-verdict-silicon-valley/70557912/ It wasn't that what happened to her wasn't because of discrimination, she was just unsuccessful at proving it. Which means we should all act if it was discrimination and it is happening all over.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:13 PM
9

For some reason this case became a focus on all the supposed gender issues in the tech industry. It wasn't. It was a specific case that was judged on its merits.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:59 AM
36

Fake rape claims, fake viral videos, unfounded discrimination suits, these all, for some reason, result in getting policy changes. Doesn't matter if it is warranted or not.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:53 AM
1

Or do you think schools should be able to punish people for making statements to the media? If you lie about the university staff covering up your brutal sexual assault, yes. That is a violation of the code of conduct.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:37 PM
1

But they can punish things that aren't crimes, like cheating. "The injunction is simple: students pledge never to lie, cheat, or steal, and accept that the consequence for breaking this pledge is permanent dismissal from the University." http://www.virginia.edu/honor/ Did she lie?
/r/MensRights24/03/15 02:19 PM
1

UVA is a public school bound by the constitution. What does the constitution have to do with it? There are forms of speech that are not illegal or criminal but can still get you in trouble for violating the code of conduct. I'm pretty sure falsely accusing university staff of covering up a crime would fall under that. Go ahead and give her a hearing although I'm pretty sure she would voluntarily withdraw from school rather than try to explain the many holes in her story.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 02:03 PM
1

Permitting the government to decree this [false] speech to be a criminal offense Being expelled doesn't mean you get put in jail, just like cheating on a test could get you expelled but won't put you behind bars. It is an administrative action. She among other things accused the university of covering up the assault.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:18 PM
2

Libel, slander, defamation, threats, are all examples of speech that can get you arrested, sued, or expelled.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:38 PM
1

She should be kicked out of school, but the school officials seem to have lost interest in finding out "what really happened" very quickly after the questions surfaced about the article.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:51 AM
3

The purpose of criminalizing the purchase of sex is to avoid human trafficking of sex slaves, as well as avoiding that men have easy access to sex to force them to be slaves of women. Not really. They don't want prostitution at all, they say it is incompatible with equality and feminism. the human trafficking is just a pretext.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:34 PM
1

I think here they are conceding that it is not a fair match up. It's like saying it is ok if 2 guys the same weight fight but a heavy weight vs. and welterweight is not a fair match.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:30 AM
4

Video of an undefeated, dominate female muy thai figher vs a middling male opponent. She gets in some good shots and has good skills but the man is just too strong and fast. Once he gets a feel for her and realizes she can't hurt him it is all over. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsaTPtUl4vs
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:21 AM
5

Look, any report that examines "gender" inequality, bias, etc is not about "gender" it is about women and girls. Any finding that identifies men and boys being the victims of inequality will not be acted upon.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 06:09 PM
2

To those who minimize this because they don't care for Walker, this kind of smear goes well beyond him. It is used as validation of "rape culture", a hostile patriarchy, and the war on women. Then it is justification to pass all laws and policies.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:38 PM
3

Why is that unreasonable or shallow? It's not unreasonable to desire that, just like it's not unreasonable for a man to desire a woman who is not frumpy. But it's also not unreasonable to expect that she expand her dating pool outside her education and income level. Men do it all the time.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:19 PM
2

So dating a guy who may not be in the same financial shape as she is is like dating a desperate refugee from the 3rd world? Sorry but that sounds pretty shallow.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:21 PM
1

Maybe she needs to expand out of her ideal criteria, she expects men to do that.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:28 PM
3

Well that's the way it goes. I was in a bar the other night and saw some pretty good looking 30 something cougars tried to hit up some bros. Things seem to be going pretty well until younger women started coming in and one by one the bros ditched out.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:45 PM
2

She did mention "tall". I honestly don't think a lot a women think this is a physical trait in the same way that being slender or having a nice chest is. They will call you shallow if you won't date a girl who is too heavy but then turn around and think it is perfectly fine to reject a guy because he is too short or doesn't have blue eyes.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:27 PM
2

No she's not, but for many women physical traits are preferences rather than requirements for attraction. That's true for everyone or only bikini models would be dating.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:22 PM
36

"Yes, I was gorgeous, ish, for a while," I've observed this a lot in women. Attractive women don't face much rejection. As they get older and start to experience it for the first time they don't know how to handle it. As most men can tell you the dating game is not easy, you face plenty of rejection along the way. She is just experiencing what most men deal with most of their lives.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:27 PM
38

“It’s the 55-year-old, slightly rumpled silver foxes that I stare at, the tall well-travelled well-used ones. But they don’t see me.” But it's ok for her and most women to prefer taller men. "Well-travelled" is a proxy for not only experience but higher income. Those men can pull younger women. Unless she is a complete beast she probably gets attention from men her age, maybe they are a little short, make middle income, and don't have enough hair to be considered silver foxes. But their attentio…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 03:07 PM
1

Why is this even a question?
/r/MensRights20/02/15 05:15 PM
1

Men plead both equality and difference when it is to their benefit. They argue equality when they want paternity leave, and difference when they want to be paid more prize money for sports. Author is out of touch with reality.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 09:45 PM
21

That woman who carries the mattress around at Columbia waited months to make a complaint. Wonder what Sokolow would say about that.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:32 AM
38

"When Sokolow brushed off the prospect of two incapacitated students assaulting one another in his report, he asked sardonically, “If [the man] really felt victimized, why didn’t he make a complaint?” Wonder if this guy would be welcomed back on campus if he questioned why a woman didn't report an assault?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:06 AM
61

They don't want any of that consent to matter if the girl claims she was "intoxicated".
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:40 PM
9

So for men, "incapacitated" means drunk to the point where he is physically incapable of getting an erection. So what point is that for a 18-21 year old, death?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:38 PM
21

That is good news and I've read of a number of these types of cases that end up in court are ruled in favor of the student. However that doesn't seem to deter these policies and I don't think it is reasonable to expect that most of these students can afford to take these cases to court. What both of these students should have gotten is a lecture on binge drinking since they were both responsible for the actions that night.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:38 PM
3

So here I am, a "victim" of real domestic abuse, a victim of the system, and not only does nobody give a shit, I actually meant that they still don't care until the violence, when a guy snaps because the only response he got throughout his life when he reached out for dealing with his emotions was "Deal with it", people ask "Why did this happen?"
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:54 PM
5

It's all part of the "man=no feelings" thing that we're supposed to portray. Men have feelings, but nobody cares until the violence starts.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:26 PM
3

And the lawsuit is based on the stress in causes female guards, not that it is clear discrimination?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:24 PM
1

No perfect victim. Like how people who defended UVA Jackie insisted "Something MUST have happened, look how she became depressed and withdrawn. That is proof."
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:20 PM
5

Nice article but I can't help but notice that female journalists seem, at least in main stream media, to be leading the way with these types of stories. I certainly applaud their work but why are the men dropping the ball? You can't tell me they have the same questions about these stories. Are they afraid of the backlash and being labeled a misogynist? Do their editors discourage men from working on stories like these because it seems more objective when written by a woman? It just seems odd to …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 03:13 PM
3

More and more localities are pushing for the "Scandinavian" model. Prostitution is not illegal but solicitation is, they only want to lock up the men.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:46 PM
1

Most of the women arrested for prostitution will be given a choice; do time, or be used in a sting operation to help arrest more "johns". Do time? I don't know how it is where you live but being busted for prostitution will rarely gets you locked up. They get guided to social services and treatment options. The only way you will do time is if it it is their 14 offense.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:42 PM
3

When in comes to attacking the patriarchy allegory is what is important, not facts.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:01 PM
14

I love the part where his support of the law comes from studies who the authors themselves said shouldn't be extrapolated to the larger population.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:34 PM
5

Nice image. I know myself, like the rest of you, is sitting alone, in the dark as I type mean, sinister comments.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:32 PM
0

He didn't write the article, just promoting it.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:29 PM
1

I'd like to know what kind of evidence that could be presented in a case like this that would convince them that the guy was innocent.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:13 PM
8

I don't think even feminists would say that They wouldn't say that but in practice that is pretty much what they want. "We must believe rape survivors!" Any evidence that a woman is not telling the truth will be explained away as "People react differently to trauma." and "Trauma can cause confusion".
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:14 PM
6

When I talked to him he seemed to be more optimistic and wanted to give life another chance. My other friends who talked to him thought the same thing. He spent a couple more days in the hospital then he got transferred to a psychiatric hospital. The doctors felt it was safe to send him home after about a week. Unfortunately he ended taking his own life a few days after he was released.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:05 AM
-5

Being a straight, white male I'm today's world is just horrible. I hope this is a joke. If you are having serious issues they must go beyond your demographics, no matter what they are.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:08 PM
19

This is actually the truth. A guy I knew in grammar school tried to kill himself. I heard about it and decided to go visit him in the hospital, we talked for a long while about things and one of the issues he was having was financial problems, he was deep in debt. As I was getting ready to leave a hospital administrator came in and wanted to discuss how he was going to pay his $30k, and growing, bill. When they have failed suicide patients being treated they have someone sitting in their room wa…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:56 PM
12

Pure speculation, but I'd imagine many who might be suicidal hold out hope that college will be better. Probably just the hope that life in general can get better because they are still young.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:12 PM
0

When were they ever trying to hide it? Giving women special or preferential treatment is usually accompanied with a celebratory press conference and press release.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:39 PM
8

She wants equal pay but doesn't think women should have to make the same sacrifices that men make to be paid more.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:55 PM
0

More equal pay for unequal work nonsense. And hope this woman understands why more men don't get on board with that actress from harry potter, if we are only supposed to care about issues that directly effect us.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:34 PM
1

Kickers get death threats on twitter for missing field goals. From these articles you'd think online threats and harassment are rare or unique to this issue.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:25 PM
1

The kind of society where everyone with a twitter account or a wordpress blog gets taken seriously.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:04 PM
6

Just look at that man so exhausted that he falls asleep on the train, you can just feel the privilege and aggression.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 04:18 PM
2

That the way it should be but it is remarkable who this has being turned into a men's behavior problem when in almost all similar cases gender, race, nationality, etc are avoided at all costs. Instead of labeling this as simply rude, selfish, or oblivious behavior it has been attacked as male privilege and aggression. You don't get the same with rude people who put their bags all over the place.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:41 PM
3

For all the people talking about Women and their bags, that's the same as saying only Men sit with their legs spread. That is the point. don't place your bags on the seats isn't given a name like "FemBaggin". And it is not singled out for focus in an article of the many rude behaviors on the subway.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 06:45 PM
7

As usual a behavior attributed to "bros" is accompanied by photos which suggest otherwise.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 05:14 PM
1

Another example of feminists being "pro-choice" only when it involves giving women a choice. Don't want to have the responsibilities and obligations of fatherhood forced upon you for a child that is not yours? Too bad. I'm surprised they stop and the women's sexual partners, why not just be able to pick any guy the woman thinks will be the best father?
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:37 PM
0

If you've been acting like the father that is sometimes enough to establish paternity even if you aren't the biological parent. Remember family court is all about "what is in the best interests of the child", correcting a case of paternity fraud is low on the priority.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:26 PM
3

Man who has been in the business for 5 decades knows how to "control" a crowd. Scary.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:12 PM
6

How would people react if the genders were reversed? Ask President Obama. Here he is extolling the ACA's provision that insurance can't charge more for health insurance "just because you are a woman", even though women file more claims on average. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE1gfxFYvR0#t=3m10s This is not meant to be a slam on Obama, it is just yet another example, because he is far from the only example of politicians who only care about equality and equity when it doesn't involve men.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:21 AM
1

If you read the piece that this article is written about you will see that it was, from the onset, effort to pin this kind of behavior on male privilege. So of course now we get the "man" prefix. You wouldn't see that if someone set out to do the same based on race, or with an aspect of female behavior. Every effort would be made to downplay it.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:08 PM
1

Yes, in the NYC catcalling video efforts where made to downplay and even apologize for the content because of the fact that most all of the offenders were non-white. You have the opposite happening here. It is not a rude people problem, it is a men's behavioral problem.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 06:42 PM
2

Reminds me of the lady who Ryan Gosling saved from walking into traffic and then complained about reporting on it because it didn't fit into her feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:34 PM
2

Even though the large majority of people dismiss things like this somehow they seem to work their way into the discussion of public policy. "OK these stats may not be correct but let pass these laws anyway."
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:32 PM
2

The best thing for the women and men living on college campuses is for all accusations of rape to be handled by the police responsible for that community. They don't want only that. Too much proof needed to prove a criminal case and you have rights to cross examine the alleged victim. Plus "Yes means yes" isn't a legal standard but it can still get you in trouble in some colleges.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:40 PM
2

Do we really believe that a rapist would admit “Oh yes, I was there and I raped her” if a journalist approached them? No but you need to at least give them the opportunity to tell their side of the story and maybe confirm or deny other facts. And maybe in the process of asking questions you might discover that some aspects of the story are implausible to say the least. Reporter: "Did you take part in a ritualized brutal gang rape initiation over broken glass with a girl you worked with at the po…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 09:58 PM
1

I believe and support you. Which means I won't ask you any questions.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 10:20 PM
1

So in cases of alleged "date rape" where it is one person's word against the other the accused will always be guilty. Now the accused gets kicked out of school, not quite the "unfriended on facebook".
/r/MensRights07/12/14 09:50 PM
4

And of course the statement out of UVA only reaffirms their commitment to sexual assault victims, no mention of vindication of the greek system.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:34 AM
6

Given the sensitivity of this issue when Rolling Stone writes that they find their trust in Jackie was "misplaced" that is liar in any other article.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:33 PM
7

I don't think they will, though, because THESE gang rapes don't fit "the narrative." Of course not. The narrative of rich, white, males who gang rape with impunity. Protected by privilege, patriarchy, and rape culture.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:40 PM
5

If someone comes forward and voluntarily admits a wrong doing you can credit from me, if they come forward and admit a wrong doing because they learn that there is video of them committing the action that is going to be released that is different.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:04 PM
17

Meh, they had no choice. The heat was on, the police got involved, too many unanswered questions. Sooner or later they would have ended up looking terrible, better they get the retraction out quickly.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 09:40 PM
107

Excuses. We still get the "Even if all the facts aren't true, clearly something MUST have happened", apologists.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:22 PM
14

No, they suspended activities, which I believe is still in effect. If I were the frat in question I would throw the kegger to end all keggers and dare them to say something.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:21 PM
29

And as expected in the comments the "real victims" of this and other false accusations are the women who won't be believed when they are raped. Not the men who are arrested, spent to jail, suffer abuse, and have their reputations ruined.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:53 PM
1

They are both physical attributes that play a role in attractiveness for many people.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:04 PM
0

If we can demand that men not use violence in response to conflicts with family and intimate partners we can expect the same from women. The emotions that cause people to lash out in violence are the same for both genders.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:58 PM
1

Hope Solo has yet to make a public statement accepting responsibility or expressing remorse for her actions. I honestly can't blame her for that since she is still facing charges.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:50 PM
1

"There is a reason why we call it the 'Violence Against Women Act'..." The Solo incident was violence against a woman, and a minor.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:49 PM
-1

...but I completely understand why someone wouldn't want to portrayed like the damsel in distress. That's what she was at that moment.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:02 PM
-1

Did anyone read her actual comment? Yes and this doesn't seem to be twisting her words at all. I'm sure she would have preferred, "Strong, intelligent, independent woman saved by harm by Ryan whatshisname", but let's face it, at that moment she was a just a helpless woman in harms way.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:59 PM
4

That usually only applies to existing business who can't afford to modify a structure built before the ADA laws. If you build a new structure you are almost always required to be compliant. This is obviously a new program and should be compliant from the start with all existing laws.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 09:08 PM
7

I wonder if the lack of resources excuse works in other areas of the law. "We don't have the resources to provide wheelchair access, but we may in the future although no date is set, too bad."
/r/MensRights25/09/11 07:41 PM
3

The mother and father could busted for the same crime at the same time and only the mother would have the option to be sentence under this program.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 07:39 PM
1

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-01-26/news/0101260162_1_sheahan-women-offenders-cook-county-jail
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:46 PM
7

Well at least being a primary caregiver is a better excuse than applying only to women than the excuse in my state. Women are given a chance at home confinement because "Women are the corner stones of the community."
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter