TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SympathyIndependent8 Archive

View 0 posts and 821 comments by SympathyIndependent8 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Do you think it's easier for young men than young women or are you only talking about people in their late 30's and older? Do you think young men can easily get a relationship, even easier than women? If so, why are they disproportionately single and sexless? As for online dating, there have been numerous studies that quantify just how terrible they are for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:14 PM
–

That doesn't make it easier. That just means that they need to work harder to get to the same level that women start at. As long as women don't drag things out until their late 30s and 40s they have an advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:08 PM
–

I don't disagree with anything you said, but I think he was implying that dating is easier for men of all ages. I don't see how that could be the case given the data we have available.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:26 PM
–

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:02 PM
–

There is a repeat theme on this sub of some men warning about how men en masse will opt out of society or something. And I can never figure out how they see that playing out in a capitalist reality. Probably the same way it's playing out in Japan. Men choose to work part-time just to make ends meet and pay for hobbies. Not chasing women and promotions, just living carefree and entertaining themselves. It's a problem in Japan since your boss wants you to work for 2/3rds of your waking hours and w…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:59 PM
–

It's true, it doesn't have as much of an impact as the woman's age, but it is statistically significant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:00 PM
2

https://c.tenor.com/SOyPC4CX4CYAAAAC/stop-dontcare.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 08:28 PM
2

Pretty sure that is creative writing. This person has reposted this 4 times and hasn't responded to any comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 08:11 PM
2

The people they're making babies with probably promised to take good care of them You are making unfounded assumptions. The only guy I know of who doesn't take care of his kids is a former drug dealer and ex-con. He has children with multiple women. He is tall, handsome, and charismatic. He is fun to be around and he often hosts parties and barbeques. Nobody with half a brain cell would be under the assumption that he would be an active and involved father. The man doesn't even have a job, he li…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:17 PM
3

I saw a random poster somewhere whose hobby was making up ridiculous things to post on FDS and laughing at the upvotes. There was also a guy here making bad-faith arguments while pretending to be a woman a couple of weeks ago. People larp on the internet all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:16 PM
1

I'll do it for $50
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 04:16 PM
1

Why you guys here and not outside trying to get laid 🤨 I have paperwork to do that I'm procrastinating on.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 09:42 PM
1

It's a test. If he freaks out he's failed the test. Would anyone even want to pass that test? What normal person wants to hear about their partner banging other people? You don't have to be an insecure inkwell to find that unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 09:33 PM
2

How do you know it’s a strawman? Because you strawmaned atheists as a whole. Is this a real question? This is not a one-off event. I genuinely don't think I've ever seen to debate in good faith regardless of the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 09:20 PM
5

Are you even capable of conversing in good faith or are crazy strawman arguments your default setting?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 09:08 PM
2

You're so cynical. For all you know he earns less than her. There is no chance of that. It's a post from FDS, they expect men to pay for everything, including their rent.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 05:57 PM
1

MOST male lineages go eventually extinct. How/why does this only apply to male lineages? "MOST men in history reproduced". Is this your opinion or did you read this somewhere? Everything I've read on the subject says that much fewer men than women reproduced. "4,000 to 8,000 years after humanity invented agriculture, something very strange happened to human reproduction. Across the globe, for every 17 women who were reproducing, passing on genes that are still around today—only one man did the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 08:44 AM
12

"The majority of men throughout history never reproduced"? That is not a PPD claim, it's a fact. You can look it up if you want to. "This begs the question that nobody seems interested in discussing. What were the majority of men throughout history doing in their day-to-day lives if they weren't fornicating"? Why are you possibly asking the question here of all places? Are we historians/anthropologists? Go and read a book on the subject if you are interested. This is beyond the scope of a random…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 05:38 AM
1

That comment is nowhere near the levels of your ridiculous strawman. I can just as easily find links to women writing about how women cheating on men is actually men's fault. Don't pretend that this is a commonly held idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 07:26 PM
4

And then the whole bus clapped.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 07:07 PM
1

https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/400x/52444550.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 09:46 PM
2

There is not a single man alive who cares if a woman is fat. That's is just made up FDS propaganda. Men are just repulsed by how insecure fat women are about their bodies. Confidence is sexy and the lack of confidence from fat women is the thing that drives men away. Also, fat women overcompensate by faking confidence all the time. It is offputting because they are obviously putting on a front. Men can tell it's not real confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 08:51 PM
1

No one has ever said it isn’t harder if you’re short, ugly, broke, stupid, whatever. Really? I could have sworn that short, ugly, broke, stupid, fat men were slaying mad pussy. At least that is what some of the posters here have told me. Must have been the wind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 08:44 PM
1

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/200/420/BRTky.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 04:55 PM
–

Aiming within your league is not the same thing as aiming to be average. If you are an atractive, successful person then you don't have to settle for a chubby, divorced, single parent and call it a day. Being the best that you can be is always good advice, but most people's best is average. Acknowledging that and moving on with your life is important. I'm doing better than most people my age, but I'm still dissatisfied due to always moving the finish line 3/4 of the way there. Sure, it forces me…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:13 AM
–

I don't know about you, but I set reasonable goals for myself. Things that I am capable of and can be expected to achieve. What exactly are you suggesting with your comment? That people start chasing supermodel, millionaire, sugar mommies/daddies instead of their opposite-sex equivalents? Sure, let's all be single and miserable due to our own delusional expectations. Seems like a great plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:39 AM
2

Dude, WTF is wrong with you that you thought this post was a good idea? You are using a god damn war to score internet points and jerk yourself off to feeling superior to the "incels" here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 06:27 PM
2

The real question is, will it stop men like purple possum? I'm going to say no. I've seen obese women in stained t-shirts and sweatpants out with their significantly fitter boyfriends with my own two eyes. Guys are simply less picky when it comes to these things. I strongly believe that if all the out-of-shape, neckbeard, anime-watching, weebs magically turned into heterosexual women tomorrow, half of them would find boyfriends by the end of the month.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:13 AM
3

Bad Vegan "After marrying a mysterious man who claimed he could make her dog immortal, a vegan restaurateur finds her life veering off the rails". WTF is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:00 AM
0

Your second comment doesn't have anything to do with your first comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:50 AM
6

There is a guy here simping for morbidly obese women every single day and you think not "dressing well" is going to be a barrier in this hypothetical scenario?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:46 AM
6

OP, how long are you going to keep making multiple versions of essentially the same post? There is little to no difference between this and your last 10 posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 12:26 AM
0

You are always free to find a study to support your position.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 09:52 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 09:46 PM
0

I think they don’t ask because they don’t care. "There was a “peak” in willingness. People were typically less willing to consider a relationship with a virgin than someone with a bit of experience. But, after two to three partners, willingness declined steadily from about 7 out of 9 for four partners, to about 2 out of 9 for 60-plus". https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/darwin-does-dating/202112/how-many-past-sexual-partners-is-too-many
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 09:27 PM
4

Allegedly, because they don't ask in real life, N-count must not matter to most men, It's impolite to discuss your salary with your coworkers, therefore nobody cares about money.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 09:18 PM
2

I suppose it's reasonable, then. You think that's reasonable?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 08:18 PM
2

Are these rules for dating relationships and vetting for commitment? For everything up until marriage. Then presumably the parasites become butterflies for their HVM (high value man). The thing is they always have posts about "if he cared, he would". In these posts, they talk about guys they know or heard about who are doing literally everything in the relationship. Working overtime, paying for everything including expensive vacations, doing all the housework, planning high effort expensive (mos…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 07:40 PM
2

Browse FDS for a while and you will get the gist of what they think. They "are the table", women have inherent worth and men must prove their worth. The traditional female role is actually a "mommy bangmaid" and women shouldn't cook, clean, or in any way perform traditional duties for men. Don't even listen about his troubles at work because that is emotional labor and you are not his therapist. 50/50 relationships are also bullshit. Women should not pay for anything, that includes rent. Don't h…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:59 PM
2

​ For example, men don't respect women who have sex too easily. So, FDS responds by saying "don't have sex too early." Don't have sex too early with him. They have no problem with fucking guys on the side. ​ Another example, men don't actually like being pursued. They find it emasculating. So FDS tells women that "if he wanted to, he would" and cautions women from pushing too much for attention and commitment. They use it as an excuse to be lazy and narcissistic. Making guys jump through hoops b…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 10:34 AM
2

I don't think he only meant cooking. It's the whole not doing wife shit. These women aren't doing anything, not just cooking. Any normal guy will think that she is either using him or just doesn't care about him, not only a "lunk head". Why would a person think "this woman who does nothing is going to turn into Suzy Homemaker the second I put a ring on it".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 10:20 AM
3

All women are simultaneously never approached, therefore not having an easier time getting into a relationship, and are constantly harassed by horny men in the frozen peas section of the supermarket depending on what is most convenient for the conversation today. Also, women aren't a monolith, but I can speak for all women because I am a woman and every woman thinks like me. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 09:59 AM
1

Yeah, I really don't get why people are so obsessed with the idea that one's love life or lack there of is caused by who you are as a person rather than how good looking(or not) you are It's a type of just-world fallacy. You get what you deserve. Poor people are stupid and lazy. If you can't get a date it's because women sense that you are a misogynist. Never mind that abusers and literal woman beaters get dozens of women. People, in general, don't like to appear shallow or close-minded, but wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 09:44 AM
1

I literally have never gotten approached by a stranger once .....I've gotten approached by strangers a few times and I'm a man who hardly leaves the house except to go to work or the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 09:26 AM
2

Guess we should just declare our independence. Viva la Reconquista! Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:08 AM
2

life expectancy was much shorter That part of your comment is not really a good argument. Life expectancy was mostly low due to child mortality. People often lived into their 50's or 60's. They also got married much younger. Not a lot of difference between getting married at 30 and living to 80 or getting married at 16 and living to 60.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 02:49 AM
2

Poland is next door to Ukraine. Syria is not next door to Sweden and Germany. The refugees are also mostly women, children, and the elderly instead of young men like before.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 12:55 AM
1

This study has no data. Where is the methodology? "In conclusion, it is possible to state that the article by Queens College (2009) though provides certain information which proves that the researchers’ claim about the difference of attractiveness rating is viable, the article still leaves out many important data. Therefore, the reader only gets an idea about the research: the major concern of the research, some data about methodology, the major claim of the researchers and some evidence of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:47 AM
1

This is such a misconception and it is not what the research shows us. Women are much more flexible on looks than men. Show us the research. A quick google on the topic says you are mistaken. "She explained that physical attractiveness appears to act as a gatekeeper for potential mates. If a man meets a required level of physical attractiveness, then women are willing to consider his personality characteristics, the study revealed". "However, the new findings, combined with previous research in …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 10:20 PM
1

You have a truly warped sense of reality if you think jailbirds and educated law-abiding people are the same. Educated law-abiding people are not the tigers or sharks. They are verifiably, statistically, measurably, better partners than the jailbirds. They do fewer drugs, drink less, make more money, divorce less often, are less abusive etc. This is backed up by research.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 01:01 AM
2

Granted, I don't continue to spend my energy on people who are unkind to me Just like every other person on the planet. The whole "if you expect something in return you are not a good guy" is nonsense. Sure, if they think you owe them something unreasonable because of a small favor they once did for you, they are an asshole. At the same time, no one has the time and energy to continuously go out of their way to help ungrateful people who never reciprocate their kindness, including you. There was…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 06:08 AM
2

By your own previous statements, your mom is a bad person because she will get upset if nobody appreciates all the work she does for the family. Did she get upset because nobody thanked her for Thanksgiving dinner? What a "nice guy".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 03:26 AM
2

Not everyone needs something in return for their kindness. Even your own mother expects something from you in return. Even if that something is a kind word and a hug. Let's not pretend that only "nice guys" want to be treated well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 11:23 PM
2

expect nothing in return You have an extremely warped view of "nice" people. Even your own mother expects a kind word of thanks on occasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 11:17 PM
1

Sound a lot like "a penguin might bite me too so I'd rather swim with the sharks". Or "I don't know what they put in Redbull so I'd rather snort come cocaine". I actually know of a woman who thinks like that. Uses drugs but won't get the vaccine because "I don't know what kind of harmful chemicals they put in them". It's a bizarre and idiotic mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 07:01 PM
1

I only know one guy like that (in passing) and he was a drug dealer who spent 10 years in jail for drugs (obviously) and taking a baseball bat to a cop's head. I don't know exactly how many kids he has, but I know it's a few with multiple women (I think 3 different women). He is currently unemployed and lives with a sugar mama (not one of the women he got pregnant). It's not exactly a surprise he didn't stick around, yet multiple women thought it was a good idea to get pregnant with a known drug…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 08:13 AM
0

They just know those men will treat them the same as the jailbirds. What kind of insane statement is that? Your logic is nigh incomprehensible. I've read a lot of "men bad" posts on this sub, but this is just a weird thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 07:34 AM
5

A lot of women don’t actually find bodybuilders attractive once they understand the rigidity it requires. Yep, it's a common complaint of dating a bodybuilder. That said, she might have totally just said "too much chicken". It sounds believable enough, people aren't always wordsmiths.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 07:04 AM
2

The too-muscular man is shown to have a masculine confident facial expression while the skinny guy is grinning like a clown and looks bashful. That was not part of the study. That was a stock image for the article. The study had pictures of men without a face. A face would be another variable that would confound the results of the study.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 07:18 PM
3

There would definitely be some bias in the results due to the population not being randomly selected. That said, every single study or article I've ever come across concludes that women prefer muscular, athletic men. The kinds of bodies that take years of dedication to build and maintain. "Women, when asked in a study to judge photos of men's bodies, rated the strongest men as the most attractive". "There was no nuance to these results, he said. Zero of the 160 women surveyed showed a statistica…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 07:14 PM
19

Turns out that one "ugly guy" was west elm Caleb. Women here spent weeks calling him a 4/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 06:18 PM
12

Most people are "lame", you are lame, I am lame, everyone is lame. The people who aren't "lame" get paid to entertain others. The difference is some people are attractive and some are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 06:18 PM
1

Yep, the thing is I get that we all live in our own little bubble, but this is something that you can literally google in 30 seconds. It's not like she was under any obligation to change her standards if she acknowledged that wanting a guy making 150k (minimum) was wanting an above-average income earner, but she spent hours debating a topic that could be googled in 30 seconds. She wasn't the only one either.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 12:19 AM
1

No, its definitely an inability to look at things objectively. This is like the people who think 150k salary is average. They are objectively wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:43 PM
-1

He isn't bad but he isn't THAT hot, and you guys won't accept that answer. Or, and stay with me for a second here, men are laughing at how wildly out of touch with reality women are when they rate a 6 foot 4 guy with a decent face and a good job a 4. It reminds me of a conversation I had with a woman here about average salaries. Turns out she was so out of touch with reality she thought that most people make 6+figures instead of around 45k. This is the looks version of that. You don't need to fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:42 PM
1

You are aware that she has been published more than once?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 10:09 PM
1

I literally quoted directly from Koss's study. Why did you link to a different study?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 09:54 PM
1

The Marry Koss 1 in 4 study uses "Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn't want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?" as one of the questions. Nowhere does it imply "being incapacitated to the point of being unable to give consent". doi:10.1177/088626093008002004
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 06:43 PM
1

In surveys „drunk sex“ (the rape kind) is usually defined by a person being incapacitated to the point of being unable to give consent. ​ I've seen plenty of surveys where having sex with someone who consumed any amount of alcohol counted as raping a drunk person. The studies don't have to use the legal definition of a term to classify it as rape or sexual assault for their purposes. You have to read the methodology for their definitions instead of assuming that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 06:03 PM
6

I was being sarcastic, did you not understand that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 07:38 PM
9

seen the nudes traded around sure, Jan
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 07:28 PM
10

While you can never predict any one individual's actions 100%, past behavior can be used to more accurately predict future behavior. There are entire fields of study about this. Things like how often you drink, your education level, drug use, criminal history, and how many people you had sex with in the past affect the likelihood of the individual cheating on their partner. This is fairly well studied.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 12:17 AM
2

Nobody would care. But plenty of people care when it's attractive women. People care about women more, especially young attractive women. Dog bites man is not an interesting story. This only got traction because it was unusual. Even if people cared about men who get similarly conned, it happens often enough that nobody would be interested in the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 12:08 AM
–

aren’t men supposed to be the riskier sex? isn’t that toted as king in here? screams bitch to me. 🤮 Typical shaming language trying to force men to act against their own best interest. Risk is not necessarily good. YOLOing your lifesaving on the latest crypto shitcoin is not a smart investment strategy. The risk has to be worth it. People who improperly calculate the risk to reward lose big. As to your edit, women judge men all the time for absolutely everything they do. You are judging men righ…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 11:58 PM
–

It's not about vilifying anyone, these guys have a low-risk tolerance. They are more scared of making the wrong choice than missing out on something good. Just like a bank trying to quantify risk, they are doing the same for relationships. Will they miss a chance with an otherwise good partner, maybe, but they are also less likely to make costly mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 11:44 PM
–

Thats what they said about being gay and mental health problems, until they stopped stigmatising being gay and found when they are tolerated and accepted by society, gay people operate perfectly well. When did they find that? Were there recent studies that I'm not aware of? LGBT people do have higher rates of mental illness than the general population. Also, things like autism correlate with identifying as LGBT. This is fairly well documented. "About 16% of LGB respondents reported having a long…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 11:19 PM
1

You get what you pay for. Pay below market wages and you will attract bad workers. You literally cannot attract talent by paying bad wages. A woman going “I will give you nothing, but you owe me everything” will only ever attract dirtbags. Tell me, do you call consider yourself a decent guy? Would you be fine with dating a woman who felt entitled to be treated like a queen, but provided nothing in return? A woman who considered her mere presence a gift to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 05:50 PM
1

The person I am replying to frequents the forever-alone subreddit. WTF are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:59 AM
1

How will they get "bad" men? The same way that minimum wage employers that want master's degrees get bad workers. No one worth their salt would put up this their demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:57 AM
2

Forever alone women pitying people who are objectively more successful than they are. Sure, why not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:01 PM
1

She’ll perceive him as in her league, ideally, even if external observers might not think so. Ideally, but not in practice. Their league is below average, slightly broken, bargain-bin men. Now, there is some value in those men if you are the kind of person who is happy getting the human equivalent of a used out of date cellphone at a good price, but FDS are not those kinds of people. They are choosy beggers expecting a Cadillac on a used honda civic budget. The only offers they will get are shad…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:44 PM
1

MGTOW is full of schadenfreude when women don't get their way. It does veer into misogyny at times.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:19 PM
1

The difference is, FDS is about improving yourself to live your best life and get a good partner/relationship, where MGTOW has been largely co-opted by misogyny. FDS is full of misandry. They love insulting men every chance they get. They adopted incel language and refer to men as scrotes and no value men. FDS is incredibly toxic despite being heavily moderated. They are also strangely racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:15 PM
1

A guy who is actually in her league will put up with it Why do you say that? Only a guy below their league would put up with their style of "vetting". It's like offering below-market wages for a job. Only an underqualified employee will bother with a high-stress job that pays less than similar companies. I've seen a business like that. Employee turnover is high. Company loyalty is low. Everyone quits in a few months' time and they are constantly understaffed. New grads come in, work for a few mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:05 PM
1

Friends also drift apart. Does that mean that they were never friends? People don't often make sacrifices for the sake of maintaining a new-ish relationship. That is why long-distance fails so often.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 05:56 PM
1

Why is a female incel insulting a successful woman who easily gets relationships with men?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 05:51 PM
3

A study on women and men’s height preferences found that women are most satisfied when their partner was 8 inches (21cm) taller. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201909/5-reasons-why-women-and-men-care-about-height
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 06:47 PM
10

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913000020 Forty-nine percent of women only wanted to date men who were taller than they were, whereas only 13.5 percent of men only wanted to date women shorter than they were. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-common-is-it-for-a-man-to-be-shorter-than-his-partner/ researchers found that 23% of men and 4% of women would accept a relationship where the woman was taller. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/20190…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 06:45 PM
1

An average looking woman is not looksmatched with a top 20% man because she's wearing makeup in her pics. It would be like a guy thinking he is hot shit because he put on platform shoes and a toupée.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 06:31 PM
1

Feminism is the reason the FBI's definition of rape includes men. Citation needed. “Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman". Mary P. Koss Also, you are giving a lot of credit to feminists for things that they had nothing to do with. Feminists…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 06:51 PM
1

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:15 AM
1

To lead into the second part of my comment. "That said, I know how it feels to lose perspective".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 12:43 AM
1

Sorry, but don't assume things you don't know. I'm was basing the numbers on an average height woman. That is why I said almost definitely. The BMI is different if you are taller than average.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 12:38 AM
0

You were almost guaranteed to be obese You were not You are almost definitely overweight That said, I know how it feels to lose perspective. Me from 7 years ago would have thought that present-day me is jacked. Present-day me thinks I'm in relatively okay shape. It's like money, once you get to a certain point, you start to compare yourself to a different standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 12:11 AM
1

Blocking is against the rules?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 05:53 AM
1

I have no idea it is FDS slang I know, I was just hoping someone could shed some light on the isha part of the slang. It just doesn't roll off the tongue so I was wondering if there was a meaning behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 05:46 AM
1

pickmeisha I get the pick me part, but is there any significance to the isha part of the slang? It's a weird add-on that I never understood.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 05:40 AM
17

Let's not kid ourselves here. You can tell that a guy is tall and wealthy at a glance.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 03:52 AM
2

Christianity being oppressive than the woman getting pregnant. So in non-Christian countries like India or China, the women could have all the sex they wanted outside of marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 10:50 PM
1

But women couldn't have sex, even without getting pregnant How do you propose they would do that? The loophole? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8ZF_R_j0OY Why do you suppose things were that way? Shits and giggles? Pregnancy was the reason that women couldn't afford to mess around with fuckboys. Pregnancy was also the reason that if a guy knocked up a "woman of good morals" otherwise known as "not a prostitute" the guy had to support that woman or go to jail. Hell, the guy didn't even have to k…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 10:23 PM
3

I don't know what your second point is. Yeah birth control didn't exist? And you can't put two and two together?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 08:43 PM
1

They could still have sex though. With sex workers, if they didn't mind harming their reputation. Women couldn't Birth control didn't exist yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 07:52 PM
2

For the man, he didn't have much punishment out side of people knowing he had sex and the judgment that came with that Seducing a woman of good moral standing was a crime. "The text of the New York law was typical of what was to come. Seduction was a “crime against society” and those found guilty of it could face a maximum of five years in prison and a fine of up to $1,000". "In all but three states with these laws the offense of Seduction was classified as a felony, and conviction could lead to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 05:05 PM
1

Oh, you're just a troll. My fault for engaging with you. Congratulations, you wasted a moment of my time. You can feel good about yourself now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 08:48 AM
1

Apparently, you don't know how to do math. There are 166 million women in the USA. 4% of 166 million is 6.64 million. Also, that is not a very large number. There are more that 3X as many millionaires as women who would be fine dating a shorter guy. "The Global Wealth Report says that the total number of millionaires in the US is 20.27 million". https://spendmenot.com/blog/what-percentage-of-americans-are-millionaires/#:\~:text=How%20many%20millionaires%20are%20in%20the%20US%20in%202020%3F&text=…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 08:22 AM
1

Your mentality around it and lack of confidence is probably part of the problem. You are talking out your ass. I don't have a "confidence issue", I have a lying about statistically verifiable facts issue. Women like tall men, it is what it is, no point in crying about it. At the same time, pretending that the sky isn't blue is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 08:07 AM
1

A little taller or shorter is fine. I know lots of women like me. "Lots" is like 4% of the population. "4% of women would accept a relationship where the woman was taller". https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201909/5-reasons-why-women-and-men-care-about-height#:~:text=Another%20study%20found%20that%20among,5%20feet%209%20inches%20tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 06:31 AM
1

5’3” and up and you should be fine "Relatedly, a study about height and human mate choice found that, on average, the shortest man a woman would date is 5 feet 9 inches tall". https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201909/5-reasons-why-women-and-men-care-about-height#:\~:text=Another%20study%20found%20that%20among,5%20feet%209%20inches%20tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 06:27 AM
1

I can’t believe you did that now there’s less men for the rest of us”. Then we would listen to them. Men would have as much luck getting a sexually successful guy to stop sleeping with lots of women as you would in getting Bezos to give you a few million. It's a stupid thing to even talk about. ​ I’m guessing men don’t do that? Guys don't generally talk about their love lives at all among each other. Why would we?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 03:47 AM
3

I guess she thinks that men yelling "NOOO!!! Mr Wilt Chamberlain, stop having no strings attached sex with thousands of women, leave some for the rest of us!" will change things. While where at it, should we also ask Bezos to give us each a couple of million?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 03:24 AM
1

Your idea of "plump" is what we in the medical community call morbidly obese. "This table shows us that a woman who is 5 ft. 4 in. tall is considered overweight (BMI is 25 to 29) if she weighs between about 145 and 169 pounds. She is considered obese (BMI is 30 or more) if she is closer to 174 pounds or more". https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/diet-physical-activity/body-weight-and-cancer-risk/adult-bmi.html
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 11:42 PM
11

Your idea of "plump" is what we in the medical community call morbidly obese. "This table shows us that a woman who is 5 ft. 4 in. tall is considered overweight (BMI is 25 to 29) if she weighs between about 145 and 169 pounds. She is considered obese (BMI is 30 or more) if she is closer to 174 pounds or more". https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/diet-physical-activity/body-weight-and-cancer-risk/adult-bmi.html
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 11:42 PM
1

You are backpedaling after you insulted me due to your lack of reading comprehension. At least apologize for your mistake and your passive-aggressive bullshit. And where exactly did you define what early stages of dating are? I didn't and you never asked me to. As for early stages, the first 5 dates or so seems about right. Afterward, it gets more reciprocal unless the woman is entitled and believes that a guy should do/pay for everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 11:09 PM
1

No, you didn't. And no, it isn't. "The early stages of dating are 100% centered around women's wants and interests". My exact quote. Learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 10:45 PM
1

all dating is entirely based on doing things women enjoy I said early dating and I said that because it's true. Early dating is men asking women out to activities that the women would enjoy and trying to make a good first impression, all the while paying for it. It's only later on that things become more reciprocal. You took issue with this and have been arguing with me for like two hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 10:22 PM
1

That's not what I said, and you know it. That is exactly what you are implying, otherwise, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 10:04 PM
1

So in your world women ask men out to an activity that the men enjoy and pay for both of them? This happens frequently?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 09:54 PM
1

What you're telling me here is that you have literally nothing to back up your claim. Reality
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 09:39 PM
1

clearly have nothing to back up your obviously lacklustre claim Reality? How about you back up your claim? Make a post here asking men how many times they were asked out by a woman to go to an activity that he would enjoy as a first date, I'll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 09:28 PM
1

Is it? Do you have something to back that up? You know, some sort of concrete evidence that all dating is centred on what women want? It doesn't hold true in my experience. Are stereotypical first few dates 1v 1 basketball and fishing? Do women take men out golfing or baseball games on their dime as a first date? Is that how things go in your world?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 09:06 PM
1

Are you incapable of taking in generalities without making things personal? Why are you presuming to give me relationship tips? Also, saying that the early stages of courtship are centered on what women want is an objective fact. Acknowledging this does not mean that I "only want sex".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 08:23 PM
2

Are you not getting time, attention, affection, and entertainment? Do you think the stereotypical date is most men's version of fun? The early stages of dating are 100% centered around women's wants and interests. And of course if you're the only one paying, then you're dating the wrong people. Then it seems like the majority of men are dating the "wrong people".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 08:12 PM
2

you're getting courtship out of the woman too Am I? Do men get wined and dined on their dates dime?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:55 PM
31

Not even single mothers want to date a man with kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:50 PM
1

Courtship vs hookups. Courtship is more time and effort invested.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:48 PM
0

Generalizations are only wrong when they portray women poorly. Generalizations are good if they portray women positively or men negatively. Get with the program, this is basic material.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:36 PM
1

Stop having sex with him for a year and see how he reacts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:31 PM
0

I will never understand people who make excuses to accept less for offering more.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:29 PM
4

The article I linked already conted video games. Also, while the pew article says that men have more leisure, it also says men work (slightly) more hours. Neither of these articles prove that women have more skill-based hobies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 12:10 AM
2

"In an average week, the 156+ million women in the U.S. consume just shy of 73 hours of media—that’s five more hours of media than men". "Adult women in the U.S. spend almost four hours per day with live TV" https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2019/attention-marketers-u-s-women-are-eager-to-hear-from-you/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 11:46 PM
3

"Fiction is one thing, but the mythology of the witch can also spill over into what we think of as historical fact. So entrenched is the belief that witches are women that radical feminist Mary Daly once called the witch hunts that swept across early modern Europe a ‘woman’s holocaust’. But, the history of the witch trials is far more complex. Not only were many thousands of men tried and executed as witches, but in countries like Normandy, Estonia, Burgundy, Russia and Iceland, more men than wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 11:35 PM
2

Neither will men. ?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 11:25 PM
3

I drink a little rum now and then and suddenly everyone calls me an alcoholic. *Chugs gallon of Captain Morgan* Women here will never stop conflating not wanting someone who has slept with half the city to wanting virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 11:20 PM
1

I'm assuming it's a red flag because the guy "can't handle a real woman". A pickme is too accommodating, real men have an intense need to jump through flaming hoops for the human equivalent of stale bread.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 06:28 AM
15

Lmao I’d love to read your search history I literally just googled it to see if she is full of shit. Took me 2 seconds. Also, I work in healthcare. If porn was destroying men's ability to reproduce as she claimed, I probably would have heard about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 11:23 PM
6

It's just insecure women making up boogymen to justify their feelings. Men insecure=men are wrong. Women insecure=men are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 11:16 PM
10

I can read perfectly well, all your points are still horseshit. "Looking at pornographic images of men and women together can increase the quality of a man's sperm, a new study suggests". https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/08/1386177.htm#:\~:text=Looking%20at%20pornographic%20images%20of,sperm%2C%20a%20new%20study%20suggests.&text=human%20males%20viewing%20images%20depicting,%5D%20sperm%20in%20their%20ejaculates.%22
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 11:13 PM
16

WTF does this have to do with porn? Junk science WTF does this have to do with porn? Dude cheated on his wife. WTF does this have to do with porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 11:04 PM
1

In general, I've never been part of a school system that would grade on a curve. If half the class fails, then half the class fails.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 02:45 AM
–

I have absolutely no idea of what you are talking about. I have never come across this. Can you link some comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 12:22 AM
4

There are plenty of other people on this site, maybe even on the sub, who are also blessed genetically but think their success is due to their attitude or something, just like him. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2210263-lifes-winners-think-success-was-earned-even-if-it-was-down-to-luck/ "Whoever was randomly picked to play the first card in round one of the game always had an advantage that meant they were most likely to win that round". "winners were more likely than losers to attribute s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 05:25 AM
1

Can confirm ur link works Of course it does, Lillth is just being Lillth.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 03:15 AM
3

I'm like 6'2 and girls don't magically embrace me for my height. "According to the probit estimates, women have a strong aversion to men who are shorter than themselves, while the logit estimates imply that regardless of their own height, women prefer to meet tall men". "Table 5.5 shows the trade-offs between height and income. A man who is 5 feet 6 inches tall, for example, needs an additional $175,000 to be as desirable as a man who is approximately 6 feet tall (the median height in our sample…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 03:08 AM
4

It doesn't get me anything "in the workplace, each inch above average may be worth $789 more per year" "The findings suggest that someone who is 6 feet tall earns, on average, nearly $166,000 more during a 30-year career than someone who is 5 feet 5 inches--even when controlling for gender, age and weight". https://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug04/standing#:~:text=The%20findings%20suggest%20that%20someone,found%20by%20psychologist%20Timothy%20A. Making the best of what you have is good advice, but w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 02:57 AM
3

Anybody plays video games? Yes If so, do you think that gaming is dead? No That said, publishers have become much more predatory than they were 15-20 years ago. Games are simultaneously better/worse than they were ever before.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 11:52 PM
1

Here’s the issue: Teachers will give curves if the grade average is that poor. So yes, Fs are changed to Cs and the original Cs will be change to B or A. In my field, anything below C+ is a failing grade. Once you get to grad school, anything below a B is a failing grade. There is no curve.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 11:41 PM
3

Edit: Your link is broken. Works for me. You said "If you actually did some research on male depression,you’d really work and school were the top causes of depression, not relationship". Yet, relationships are literally the top cause of suicide in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 04:21 PM
2

Relationships: The majority of men who kill themselves are either not in a relationship or recently separated. Research shows that nearly 3 in 10 male suicides are linked to separation and as many as half of all separated fathers experience thoughts of suicide. https://www.amhf.org.au/the\_5\_risk\_factors\_for\_male\_suicide
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 04:08 PM
3

People use analogies in order to make the listener view things from another perspective. It's about facilitating discussion, not equating two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 04:04 PM
1

C remains average The average grade would drop, but C would remain the minimum passing grade.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 06:40 PM
1

The guy's appearance rarely comes into it citation needed
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 12:12 AM
2

My two seconds of google on the subject gave me this result. Probably why USA and Europe have different figures. "Black women evidenced pregnancy-associated IPH rates more than threefold higher than that observed among White and Hispanic women". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33527866/ Edit-now that I've thought about it for another minute, that probably doesn't make sense given the relatively low number of black women in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 12:06 AM
–

That's still not deception. https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/b6x9l0/lie_about_your_sexual_count_number_when_seeking/ Again, 2 seconds of google. Anyway, if you ignore the incel-like rants on FDS and only focus on the handbook, it does become more palatable. Nevertheless, FDS is ultimately its adherents and not some perfect version of the ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 07:09 AM
–

True. For all the crap FDS does, they don't advocate deception. They literally do exactly that. https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/jainaj/on_disclosure_your_past_is_none_of_his_business/ This took 2 seconds of google. I've seen a dozen posts advocating lying to men and I don't bother to frequent that subreddit more than once every couple of months.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 05:11 AM
0

There are literally numerous posts advocating straight-up lying to men. They tell users to lie about their sexual history, lie about seeing other men, lie about their intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 05:09 AM
–

i mean it exists but it’s kinda stupid. That is not for you to deside. Also, you are moving the goal posts. The point was for you to acknowledge your blind spot. Every single negative attribute you ascribe to TRP is applicable to FDS. The only reason you think one is better than the other is because of your biases. FDS is TRP+incels. They literally use the same language as incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 05:03 AM
–

It was "free dinner strategy".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 04:38 AM
–

men aren’t scared of being taken advantage of. That is why the term "divorce rape" doesn't exist. That is why TRP men aren't railing against "post-wall" women using men they aren't attracted to, to build a hallmark life with, then divorcing them when they have extracted all the resources from them. Half the anger in the manosphere is out of fear of being used/taken advantage of.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 04:31 AM
–

We already appeal to men. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 04:13 AM
5

10lbs per month Holy shit!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 06:28 PM
2

Maybe it's not your prefered love language You've solved the mystery.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 04:31 AM
1

Thank you, but I don't have a vase. What am I supposed to do with them? Now that I think of it, how many flowers are we talking about? I think I might appreciate the gesture of 1-3 flowers, while a large bouquet might slightly annoy me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 04:28 AM
1

no matter how badly you want it not to be You are making a lot of assumptions. I have absolutely no ill intent with my posts. You clearly have some kind of issue with this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 12:21 AM
1

Sure, let's just keep rehashing this topic every election until the heat-death of the universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 12:16 AM
1

You read what you wanted to into my comment so you could lecture everyone and try to make pregnancy in your 40s seem impossible I've literally posted the statistics while you are using anecdotes. I seem to have struck a nerve with this topic so I'm just going to drop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 12:14 AM
1

No one is saying it’s easy You implied it with your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 11:53 PM
1

Seems pretty negligible Once in a blue moon, it can be enough to change the outcome of an election. I see no issues with voter ID in general. 97% of the population already have a valid ID. Implement a system similar to every other country on the planet and move on to the next issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 11:46 PM
1

And yet, they didn't find that with the recount... The system works "October 2010, Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman announced that charges would be brought against 43 felons for illegally voting in 2008".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 11:32 PM
1

I was only responding to your comment that "women can have kids into their 40's". There is too much misinformation going around regarding fertility. It leads to some women being unpleasantly surprised when they finally get around to starting a family. All the "My second cousin twice removed had a kid at 47" really distorts people's perceptions of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 11:23 PM
1

I know, the point was the election was decided by 49 votes. I think it would be fairly easy to find 49 fraudulent votes in any given election.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 11:02 PM
1

Claiming a woman in her 20s is panicking over fertility is laughable WTF are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 10:50 PM
1

affecting election outcomes I don't know how much of it is outright fraud, but wiki says 3 state-level elections were overturned due to a recount. The 2008 Minnesota senate election was decided by 49 votes. Seems like it wouldn't take much to occasionally change an elected position in a swing state.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 10:49 PM
1

“Widespread” seems like a bit of a weasel word. Like, sure there is “some” voter fraud, but it’s not a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 09:42 PM
2

"About 96.6 percent had at least one photo ID in the form of a driver’s license, passport, public assistance ID, military ID, Native American ID, ID from an in-state college, firearm license, or an ID from a federal, state or local agency, while 3.4 percent either did not have one of those forms of ID, did not provide a response or did not know". Seems like everyone has an ID.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 08:07 PM
1

to solve a problem that doesn't exist... If it's not a problem, why does basically every country on the planet require an ID to vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 08:04 PM
-1

Yes, and? It’s still possible I don't think you realize how stupid that comment sounds. Possible and probable are two different things. Winning the lotto is also possible, doesn't make it a good retirement plan. If a woman wants to have kids, she definitely should plan ahead. Counting on getting pregnant at 40 is a recipe for disaster. It is irresponsible to misrepresent the likelihood of pregnancy at 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 07:33 PM
0

"At 40, your chance of conceiving within a year is about 40 to 50 percent, compared with a woman in her mid 30s, who has a 75 percent chance. By age 43, a woman's chance of pregnancy plummets to 1 or 2 percent". "After 45, experts say, it's almost impossible to get pregnant using your own eggs". https://www.babycenter.com/getting-pregnant/preparing-for-pregnancy/age-and-fertility-getting-pregnant-in-your-40s_1494699
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 07:21 PM
3

The solution: Work your ass off to become one of them. While possible, that is highly unlikely to happen on an individual level. On a societal level, it's outright impossible for everyone to become part of the ruling class.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:21 PM
2

What about the people who straight up claim they have body pillows? Some of them are telling the truth because "who cares about the opinion of randos on the internet. Some of them are putting on an act for shits and giggles. It's funny that everything positive is a lie while every negative is a truth... The positive things are more often a lie because they wildly exaggerate everything for internet clout. Anybody who believes that attractive, wealthy people with fulfilling social lives are spendi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 01:57 AM
2

She’s kind of good looking? Not particularly, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 01:20 AM
2

Is this your first day on the internet? People online are full of shit. Do you think all the people claiming to make 6-7 figures here are telling the truth? Do you think all the women here claiming to be badass bitches and saying men are shit are happy? No, the people bragging about money are defaulting on loans, the bad bitches are posting on suicide watch subreddits and the "Chads" are jerking it to their waifu pillows.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 01:08 AM
1

What detriment, what have you lost after a coffee date? The point of a coffee date is to get a feel for someone in real life before investing any more time/effort. What is the point of planing an expensive or elaborate date right off the bat? Edit-grammar
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 05:33 PM
2

Less misogynistic then men that don't get women. It's statistically proven at this point. Has it been proven? Seems like the opposite is true. "we find that there is a strong positive association between sex partners and antisocial behavior". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19350760/ Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church less, and have a criminal history. A Dr. Beaver (nominative determinism again!) was able to predict number of se…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 06:29 AM
2

attractive men are at the top of the hierarchy. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 06:14 AM
2

It doesn't matter how people should act. Rewarding bad behavior or punishing good behavior leads to more bad behavior. Few people can afford to do the right thing to their own detriment. "People who steal are probably better at acquiring certain resources. Does that justify stealing? Should everyone steal now"? Not punishing stealing leads to more stealing. It's not rocket science. https://www.hoover.org/research/why-shoplifting-now-de-facto-legal-california https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/21/us…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 06:07 AM
2

Great, I'll paddle my way over. Sit tight, it might take me a while depending on where you are located.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 01:47 AM
1

I’m not lol I just wanna do something more exciting, I’ll pay half I promise Canoeing?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 01:41 AM
–

Children generally do better with both parents in the home=you should stay with dangerous and abusive men. That is their thought process.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 01:32 AM
1

Nah, crazy, dangerous, and predatory (not saying she is dangerous, just using an example) people will always exist. The only issue is people running cover for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:15 AM
7

I like to equate it to "poor people are just stupid and lazy". I think it comes from the same kind of mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 11:00 PM
1

Because the population they studied was Dutch. Different country, different divorce laws, different culture. This doesn't mean that their research is automatically inapplicable to the US, but it does have to be acknowledged.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 10:14 PM
2

No problem at all, it's just a pet peeve of mine. That and irregardless, though so many people say it that way it seems to be becoming grammatically correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 08:13 PM
1

couldn't*
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 07:53 PM
4

Are you in a trolly mood today or something? You know perfectly well that FDS is full of insane, entitled, predatory, horseshit. They also use incel-like language and are full of weird hangups/theories. There is no way that any sane individual can look at that subreddit and think "these are perfectly normal women who just want to get to know somebody before having sex with them".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:03 AM
1

You are definitely not a gaslighter. You are a bit weird, but you engage in good faith discussions. That said, you are a massive outlier and completely unrepresentative of a typical woman. Part of the problem you might be having conversing with some of the male commenters here is just other people's bullshit bleeding into their perception of what you say. There are soo many people here that we kinda have to put them into a box to save time/energy. Also, some people here are just incapable of con…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 03:13 AM
1

I really don't understand why more people can't just say "I get what you are saying, but I disagree with you". Why must some people strawman every opposing argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 09:29 PM
1

Yup. This is the part that everyone forgets. More like purposefully ignores. I refuse to believe that people who had the Pareto principle explained to them 10x a week for months or years still don't understand it. Sure, they can disagree with it no problem, but to actually not understand it at this point would signal some kind of cognitive impairment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 09:03 PM
1

You brought up a thought-terminating cliche to derail the conversation. You succeeded, the conversation is dead and buried. Why are you digging up its corpse?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 08:02 PM
1

He probably got that from when you equated a woman not getting a second date with a heterosexual man having homosexual sex. Last I checked heterosexual men, really, really don't want to have gay sex. Therefore, heterosexual women hate heterosexual sex. It might also have been when you equated a guy losing interest after a date as "getting penetrated, creamed in, and discarded ".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 11:28 PM
1

It has nothing to do with “projecting the male experience”. Just because it’s not everything you want, doesn’t mean that it’s not an advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:13 PM
1

"Getting a match is step one of getting a relationship. Getting a date is step two". Having an easier time in steps 1 and 2 is an advantage. Do you understand now, or do I have to get out the crayons?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:16 PM
0

You can be picky without being delusional. Considering the vast majority of men as "below average" isn't "picky", it's out of touch with reality. I doubt you are as lenient on obese, neckbeards who go "3/10, elbows too pointy" talking about supermodels.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:09 PM
2

Let me repeat myself, "It takes real delusion not to recognize an overwhelming advantage". Just because they don't have everything handed to them, doesn't mean that they don't have it easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:06 PM
5

Women here like to equate "wanting a woman who hasn't had sex with every single guy in the city' as "wanting a virgin". Most people drink. There is nothing wrong with having an occasional drink. On the other hand, everyone has some perception of what is too much drinking to be healthy. What is too much is different depending on the person, but everyone has a point where they look at a guy and think "he has a drinking problem'. Even you, a guy who is obsessed with obese women, probably has a poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:03 PM
3

On the other hand, the women here are totally normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 05:56 PM
2

Getting a match is step one of getting a relationship. Getting a date is step two. If you cant make it work despite getting a headstart that is on you. It takes real delusion not to recognize an overwhelming advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 05:54 PM
1

Why are you flared as "blue pill woman"?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 05:48 PM
2

80% of people can't be below average. That is evidence of a warped, out-of-touch perception of reality. Men rate women on a perfect bell curve. How hard is it to understand this?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 05:46 PM
19

There has undoubtedly been a dramatic change within the last 10-20 years. The same research says that 50% of people consider that dating has gotten harder in the last 10 years, especially for men. It takes a real head in the sand approach to look at things and say "this is fine". This isn't something only weird out-of-touch incels have noticed. In fact, it's mostly old out-of-touch boomers that haven't noticed a change in the dating sphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:50 PM
23

51% of men 18-29 are single. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/ That is literally all that needs to be said.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:39 PM
2

It's easy for an individual to gradually gain a few pounds over the course of the year. People periodically weigh themselves to prevent unintended weight fluctuations. Your thinking that measuring your weight is a sign of some kind of body issue is bizarre. Seriously, how did you come to that conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 01:39 PM
2

You have a very warped view on this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 12:11 AM
3

"But I know that I’m probably part of a very small minority in that regard, haha" Yes, It's really hard to notice gradual changes in weight. Also, I can easily put on 10 pounds and still fit in all my clothes. Eyeballing it is just not a good method for 99% of people. Especially since 99% of people will delude themselves into thinking they haven't gained weight until suddenly they are 20 pounds fatter and need new clothes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 12:09 AM
2

"If a woman is doing that, she probably has problems with her weight." That is complete and utter nonsense. It's practically fat people logic. Stick your head in the sand and say " I don't step on a scale then I haven't gained weight".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 12:02 AM
1

You seriously need to buy a scale. There is almost zero chance you are not significantly fatter than you think you are. Not checking the scale every now and then is a recipe for unintended weight gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 11:59 PM
7

"Because it's explicitly sexual" You are literally the only person on the planet who thinks that. That is the first time in my entire life I have ever heard that statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 11:53 PM
3

" probably figure it out without asking" MySpace angles are a hell of a visual trick. Some women are downright magicians with camera angles and filters.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 11:48 PM
2

" probably figure it out without asking" MySpace angles are a hell of a visual trick. Some women are downright magicians with camera angles and filters.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 11:48 PM
0

Tell me you're fat without telling me you're fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 11:44 PM
1

Who are completely and utterly irrelevant to this discussion. You brought up a thought-terminating cliche to derail the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 11:41 PM
3

It's the kind of issue where the more you think about it, the more problems come up. I haven't even scratched the surface with my comment. Saying record numbers of single young people is "no big deal" is incredibly shortsighted.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:16 PM
5

People not having sex and staying single will further exacerbate the low birth rates. The average age of marriage and children is also going to increase leading to fewer children. We live in a welfare state, we can't sustain the current system with a worse young people to old people ratio. Also, people living by themselves are exacerbating the housing shortage and are leaving a greater carbon footprint. Edit- It's also making this generation poorer. Getting married and pooling resources together…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:06 PM
1

Bringing starving orphans into the conversation is just pointless derailing. It can be used to terminate any discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:00 PM
3

Dude, are you serious? Fewer young people not getting together and starting families will have far-reaching societal consequences for decades to come. This is like saying global warming is not a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:05 PM
6

And lies in which if I do get caught I can admit to lying with straight face. I lied to you about taking out the trash so you would leave me alone, then did it 20min later. And I would do it all over again if I had to. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 04:54 PM
1

This entire subreddit is westerners talking about first-world problems. You're entire tangent is completely irrelevant and in no way furthers the conversation. My analogy was perfectly suited to the context of the conversation. No need to bring starving African orphans into it. At the end of the day, everything above the first level of Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a "luxury" as you so put it. I don't know if you are being pedantic or just completely lacking the ability to empathize.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 04:35 PM
1

You are really exaggerating things to make your point. Most people aren't starving on the street, they have money, just not as much as they need to truly enjoy life. They have food, water, and a roof over their head, they don't need anything more. By your logic, they should just STFU about income inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:13 AM
1

"You added that because you must know that average men do use women for sex." More conspiracy theories. Is it something that every average guy does 3-4 times in his life or does it happen once every blue moon? Is an average guy "using women for sex" more common than a woman using men for money? Women here constantly claim that men are paranoid about golddiggers. Ever consider that you might be similarly paranoid?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 08:04 PM
1

"Who said anything about “consistent”" I did, way back at the very beginning of this conversation, that you were a part of. I literally quoted myself. You are the one moving the goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:50 PM
1

So tonnes of average men using women for sex is actually "even a blind dog can find the occasional bone". Seems exactly in line with my comment "The only men who are in the position to consistently "use women for sex" are far above average".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:15 PM
1

Poor people can't force themselves to like living in studio apartments and drive used Honda civics either. Also, while most people don't live glamorous bourgeois lives, they are not living in squalor. It's disingenuous to paint income inequality as life or death but the absence of a vital part of the human experience as no big deal. People get depression and kill themselves from lack of sex and physical intimacy. Being sexually desired is an integral part of feeling valued as a person. Don't pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:07 PM
1

I thought those guys were incels who could never get with a normal woman? How are these wannabe Chads pumping and dumping women if no woman would touch them? Are you saying Redpill works? I always assumed they are full of hot air, but if you say it works I might have to give it a try. I don't want to pump and dump women, but I would be foolish to ignore a strategy that can get incels harems of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:51 PM
2

"The idea that only top-tier guys can use women for sex is an incel delusion. There is no conspiracy theory, men lying their asses off to get sex is as old as time.lol" Yep, tonnes of average dudes are out there pumping and dumping women left and right. I see it every day. Doesn't sound at all what a female version of an incel might say, not one bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:34 PM
2

The only men who are in the position to consistently "use women for sex" are far above average. This is an incel tier conspiracy theory. The guy was exactly mirroring the style and message of your post. Below average woman has sex with a guy out of her league, it doesn't work out. "He used me for sex! I was duped"! It sounds exactly like "80/20 allows genuinely below average men to think they are average and that women are just wrong and stupid for not wanting them".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:08 PM
1

If men use women for sex, it's only because below-average women delude themselves into thinking they are in an attractive man's league. The bottom 80% of the women delude themselves into thinking they are in the same league as the most attractive men. Works perfectly fine flipped around.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 04:43 PM
1

The same exact link also applied to what he said. Do you seriously not read what you are replying to before you comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 04:01 PM
2

Even the actual incels don't go that far.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:49 PM
1

How dare I make an easy-to-understand comparison to get my point across!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:44 PM
1

He just flipped the smug comment Flightlessbirdz made back at her. What proof do you need from him that you didn't need from her?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:39 PM
1

Yet here we all are talking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:32 PM
4

Announcer voice: Out comes the patented Lillth dodge, deflect and misdirect. Ten points from the judges! The crowd goes wild! Debating this woman is like nailing jello to the wall, amazing hustle!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:29 PM
1

Please elaborate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:24 PM
1

The same thing applies to the metaphor. Wilt Chamberlain has sex with 20k women. Bob the accountant has sex with 4. Both have sex, just in vastly different amounts. Incels are the 0.2% of the homeless. The only issue is that Lillth thinks Jeff Bezos and a Mcdonald's worker are the same because both have money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:15 PM
3

How dare people compare things to other things!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:10 PM
1

Mcdonald's workers also get paid on a weekly or biweekly basis. I guess wealth inequality doesn't exist? I'm just using your logic to make a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:07 PM
4

It's literally true with money, as well as a bunch of other random stuff. Why can't it be true for sex? Seriously, why not? Wilt Chamberlain had sex with thousands of women. So do many rock stars. I'm playing devil's advocate here, but I would like a response beyond the patented Lillth dodge, misdirect, and ignore. "Nope", is not much of an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 02:58 PM
10

You can respond that way about literally anything on the planet. I think my job is too hard and doesn't pay me enough. Lillth"THEN QUIT"!!!!!!! I think racism in America is a problem. Lillth "THEN LEAVE"!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 02:48 PM
1

The overall homeless population on a single night represents 0.2 percent of the U.S. population, or 17 people per 10,000 in the population. 13.4% of the national population lives below the poverty line. It's not quite that bad. Also, people in poverty still have little, but not enough money. Just like the guy getting laid once every 3 years is still getting sex, just not very much of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 02:36 PM
2

Being out of shape feels gross. I get depressed if I don't stay physically active. I like to flex in the mirror after a shower.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:15 PM
3

"Also the claim isn't that 80% gets nothing, the claim is that 80% gets 20%. 28% get nothing." Its top 20% get 80% of resources. The bottom 80% get what is leftover. It's exactly how money is distributed. That doesn't mean that 80% of people are literally homeless and broke. It's not difficult to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:12 PM
17

So this will in no way negatively impact that generation of people? Everything will work out perfectly well, nothing to worry about? https://tenor.com/view/its-fine-totally-fml-meme-okay-gif-16479720
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 02:40 AM
10

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 02:18 AM
1

I am doing fine for myself. That said, you do understand that everyone can't be part of the top 20%, right? Why is the median individual income in the United States is $44,225, if there are so many high-paying jobs? Why isn't everyone rich?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:45 AM
2

Already happened, lol. 🤦‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:39 AM
2

If he gets back together with her he deserves all the bullshit she will put him through in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:16 AM
15

The same article says that 51% of men 18-29 are single. You don't think this will become an ongoing issue for that generation of men? Are they all going to find girlfriends at 30? What do you think will bring about this change?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:11 AM
5

"Men bad! Women good"! Shall we compare the number of men/women who toss babies in dumpsters?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:28 PM
-2

"The OP heavily implied women are with Pete Davidson for his money " But, that is a big part of the reason women are interested in him. Where is the lie? Women like men with money. Rich women like men with even more money than they have. Pete Davidson looks mentally/physically unwell. If he was a burger flipper he might be an actual incel. Fame+Money is the only reason women don't go "EW" when they see him.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:22 PM
5

https://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/2021/10/16/22730272/woman-killed-man-at-rolling-meadows-home-after-he-refused-to-kiss-her-prosecutors-say
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:04 PM
1

"Sure, but why not pick a guy with money who’s also hot?" No idea, but she is still never gonna date a broke guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:55 PM
2

https://thecurvyfashionista.com/new-average-size/ behold the modern woman
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:41 PM
1

https://thecurvyfashionista.com/new-average-size/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:38 PM
12

"Yeah, ariana grande must have been with him for the money!" There is zero chance she would have dated him if he was broke. The dude is kinda ugly and weird-looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:29 PM
3

exhibit a https://thefeministwire.com/2013/05/feminists-we-love-assata-shakur-love-note/ https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/newss-joanne-chesimard-added-to-most-wanted-terrorists-list/view exhibit b https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/1980s-far-left-female-led-domestic-terrorism-group-bombed-us-capitol-180973904/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:00 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette\_bombing\_and\_arson\_campaign
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:53 PM
1

"Making more than 100k is hard if you don't have any specific skillset and if by the time you're around 30 and you don't have a skillset and work experience with said skillset, what have you been doing with your life"? It's unrealistic to expect everyone to be in the top 10-20%. If making 100k+ was easy, we would all be rich. Also, average and median are two different things. Average income skews higher due to some very high-income earners. The median individual income in the United States is $4…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:59 PM
2

The 80/20 rule is simply a response to the never-ending "women standards are literally on the floor, yet men cant meet them" posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:41 PM
1

"How do men under 5’9 find partners then?" There are not enough tall guys to go around. "How come men over 5’9 still struggle with women?" Women care about height a lot, but it's not the only thing they care about. Just like I mostly care about pay when deciding where to work, but I have other concerns such as time off and flexible hours. Finally, women do settle despite their stated desires. For example, only 4% of women state that they would be fine dating a guy shorter than they are, but some…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:09 AM
2

'"A study on women and men’s height preferences found that women are most satisfied when their partner was 8 inches (21cm) taller". https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201909/5-reasons-why-women-and-men-care-about-height "Relatedly, a study about height and human mate choice found that, on average, the shortest man a woman would date is 5 feet 9 inches tall". https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886907002814
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:42 AM
3

https://home.uchicago.edu/\~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf "A man who is 5 feet 6 inches tall needs to earn an additional $175,000 per year to be as desirable as a man who is about 6 feet tall".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:39 AM
2

100k is the top 20% in terms of individual income, so it's not that easy. The figure was calculated using $62,500 as the baseline. I don't want to do the math, but at a rough estimate, an extra 40k would add 2 inches or less in height to your attractiveness. So a 5 foot 6-inch making 100k should be worth around the amount as a 5-foot 8-inch guy making 62k. Maybe a bit less. An unemployed 6 foot tall guy might be roughly on par with a 5 foot 6 guy making a little over 112k. Also, not every inch i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:14 AM
5

https://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf "A man who is 5 feet 6 inches tall needs to earn an additional $175,000 per year to be as desirable as a man who is about 6 feet tall".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 01:16 AM
3

THEY are doing something wrong but short men can do no wrong! That is literally true though. Short men are just born that way, 80% of African American women are obese because they eat too much and don't exercise. Would it help you to understand if I drew a picture with crayons?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:42 AM
2

TIL, being short makes you an asshole. Weight is completely controllable, height is not. Being short is undesirable regardless of personality and is completely outside men's control. Weight is completely alterable and fully within people's control. Also, women don't like fat men either. Declaring that you won the argument doesn't make it true. Most people grow out of magical thinking by age 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:32 AM
7

'"A study on women and men’s height preferences found that women are most satisfied when their partner was 8 inches (21cm) taller". https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201909/5-reasons-why-women-and-men-care-about-height "Relatedly, a study about height and human mate choice found that, on average, the shortest man a woman would date is 5 feet 9 inches tall". https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886907002814
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:24 AM
7

Remind me when that happened? Was it before or after you called me an "insufferable whiny pussy"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:58 PM
8

"only 4% of women would accept a dating relationship where the woman was taller." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886907002814
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:54 PM
8

Yet, here you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:45 PM
5

Weight is completely controllable, height is not. You cannot possibly be that dense.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:28 PM
9

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342156/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:14 PM
10

What is the height-increasing exercise?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:07 PM
1

The way you wrote that made it sound that you are flat broke but are spending money you don't have on women. Fiscal irresponsibility is a pet peeve of mine. Never mind my comment then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:06 PM
5

Obesity is caused by a sedentary lifestyle and a poor diet. It is completely controllable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:59 PM
24

Apparently, lack of height is caused by poor lifestyle choices. TIL
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:57 PM
2

Also, "By age 43, a woman's chance of pregnancy plummets to 1 or 2 percent". It's just something women need to keep in mind if they want to have kids. Too many women here read a story about a 45-year-old woman having kids and think that's is a very likely occurrence. Too much misinformation is spread around in the name of girl power and not hurting people's feelings. There is a woman in this very thread that thinks the increased risk of genetic abnormalities due to advanced maternal age is made …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:37 PM
2

"By age 40, a woman's chance is less than 5% per cycle, so fewer than 5 out of every 100 women are expected to be successful each month. Women do not remain fertile until menopause. The average age for menopause is 51, but most women become unable to have a successful pregnancy sometime in their mid-40s". https://www.reproductivefacts.org/news-and-publications/patient-fact-sheets-and-booklets/documents/fact-sheets-and-info-booklets/age-and-fertility/#:\~:text=By%20age%2040%2C%20a%20woman's,somet…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:16 PM
3

Post sandwich picks and I'll judge your skill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:37 PM
2

Chubby broke women in their mid-thirties are in no position to be demanding dates to Michelin star restaurants. This is choosy beggar type of mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:32 PM
1

"Honey I make 12k a year. My honey eats at restaurants, we order food, go for coffee, go out drinking. All on my tab..." Dude, are you an idiot? You are in no position to finance your "honey", you are beyond broke. How/why are you proud of being both broke and fiscally irresponsible?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:28 PM
2

How dare people hold me accountable to my own standards!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:05 PM
–

How gullible are you? Would you be interested in buying the Effie Tower? For $69,420 it can be yours. You can charge the tourist a fee for taking pictures and make back the money in a week. "They" don't believe nonsense posts from guys blowing smoke up their own ass, because it contradicts observable reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:35 PM
1

"can you not read numbers? " Was that sarcasm or are you new here?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:48 PM
6

https://nie.edu.sg/about-us/news-events/news/news-detail/asian-women-prefer-taller-men-survey "The survey also revealed that Singaporean men are becoming more open to dating women taller than them. Unfortunately the same cannot be said for females - 70 per cent of female respondents said they would not date a shorter man". took 3 seconds of googling to prove you wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:18 PM
1

Am I a victim?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:50 PM
0

Snot-nosed brats tease/bully each other because they want attention and don't understand their feelings. I've also had girls mess up my hair and tease or "bully" me when I was a kid. They thought I was cute and they were idiots, a few told me that it was because they liked me when we were both older. This does not translate into adult behavior. People say "he/she teases you because they like you" because that is how snot-nosed brats act. It's fairly normal at that age. It's not normal, nor is it…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 10:47 PM
6

Men definitely judge women by their appearance and have never pretended otherwise. What we don't do is call average/below average women secretly evil, abusive, manipulative monsters. We just call them ugly. Women: I have trouble dating. Men: That is because you are ugly. Men: I have trouble dating. Women: That is because women can sense that you are evil and abusive. Women aren't shallow, so the only reason you can't find a date is that you are evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 10:09 PM
3

Men don't pretend to have some kind of magic "nice girl" detector that only seems to go off on unattractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 10:07 PM
6

It's not the men here encouraging men to date sex workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 09:59 PM
2

Obviously, 6 y/o snot-nosed brats and 30 y/o men are exactly the same. I'm off to pull the pigtails of the coworker I think is cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 09:54 PM
1

It literally doesn't though. Words have meaning regardless of what some random Redditor thinks they should mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:16 PM
1

Do words no longer have meaning where you live?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 04:23 PM
8

sympathy, attention, absolving oneself of responsibility for their failures, and in certain circumstances for power/influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:11 PM
1

It's both unfair and bad policy. Women need to be paying more into the pension system in order to make up for their higher projected withdrawals. The same line of reasoning is responsible for men paying higher car insurance premiums. The only reason we don't already do things this way is that no politician who proposes the change will ever get elected.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 07:45 PM
3

WTF?!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 04:22 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 01:59 AM
1

I'm pretty sure naming names will get me banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 02:09 AM
1

Are you serious? No, I am not getting banned for you by singling out the crazier women here. Especially since this is a moderated forum and most of these screeds have been long since deleted. Finally, I know beyond a reasonable doubt that you will never admit that you are wrong about anything. We have talked before. You are incredibly intellectually dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 12:44 AM
1

Off the top of my head, I could name 6 crazy man-haters right now. I could probably give you a dozen or so if I dig around a bit. I don't see any more crazy male incels than that either. The men with generally unfavorable opinions about women are much more numerous, but so are the women with similar opinions about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 12:37 AM
1

No one said the middle class is supposed to be luxurious. The middle class is basically just "not poor". If you conflate the middle class with the lower upper-class you just make it more difficult to classify people. What is the point of doing that? House "mortgaged", car, 1-2 vacations a year, and paying for your kid's college tuition is middle class. Ideally, you would also save up some money for retirement. Middle-class people generally don't have a lot of assets until they are nearing retire…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 12:30 AM
1

By all means, feel free to provide evidence that middle class is more than 180k a year. I'll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 12:04 AM
1

A broader and commonly used definition of the middle class includes the middle three quintiles, encompassing 60 percent of all households. In this case, middle-class incomes range from $30,000 to $130,000. https://www.brookings.edu/research/defining-the-middle-class-cash-credentials-or-culture/ There are several ways to clarify the middle class. You are wrong on all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 11:39 PM
1

There are at least half a dozen I can think of off the top of my head.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 11:06 PM
0

Let's not kid ourselves, half the women here legitimately hate men. Some are downright mentally unstable and write incel-tier "all men are evil" screeds every day. I am not kidding about the mental illness, I've seen their post histories.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 10:27 PM
0

As I said, you are objectively, demonstrably, statistically, wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 09:43 PM
1

Weird preference, but okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 09:41 PM
1

Not really, I think you are severely underestimating the musculature of these men. This is like women going "I don't like muscular men" and picking out pictures of guys who work out 12 hours a week. Tom Holland might not do steroids, but he works out a fucktonne. Similarly, a lumberjack/dadbod type guy has a nice amount of muscle on him, even though he is kinda fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 09:36 PM
1

Here middle class is; owns a house instead of rents, 1-2 vacations a year, a car, and can send kids to college. That's it, no more no less. If we used your numbers, nobody would be middle class. You are essentially blending the middle and upper classes together. It's poor, middle, upper, ultra-rich. You've essentially cut out the middle class and mixed it in with the lower-upper classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 09:31 PM
3

'23% of men compared to only 4% of women would accept a dating relationship where the woman was taller". https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886907002814 You are an extreme outlier, which is probably why people don't believe you. Especially since women here very often say they would date short men, yet somehow always end up with very tall guys (by pure coincidence). It's a meme at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 09:16 PM
1

She is objectively right about being middle class. You can literally google "what is a middle-class salary in NY' and get that answer. Hell, the middle class is even lower than that since most places will give you the household salary and households typically have more than one earner. "That equates to about $180k+ and I am nothing resembling middle class. Class is based on wealth and unless you comfortably have considerable equity in index funds or property to the point you're making a decent b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 08:56 PM
4

I don't know why he said 14 inches, but he has the right idea. Women prefer men who are 6 inches taller and 50% wealthier (ideally). Just because a 5 foot 6 guy is taller than the average woman, doesn't mean that the average woman would date him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 08:53 PM
2

I see small shoulders and arms, with a big belly and thighs. Chest is kinda a mix of both. Small pecks due to lack of muscle, but huge mantits due to fat. Fat guys don't have big shoulders and chests unless they are also muscular. You can be very muscular and have a gut.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 08:37 PM
1

Then I don't really see how he got the wrong impression. I really hate to use the term "nice guy" because it's thrown around a lot, but the guy sounds like a textbook "nice guy". Maybe he comes off better in person or knows how to give a good first impression, but from everything you wrote, I'm simply baffled at how long it took for his true colors to come out (or you to notice). I can't believe I'm saying this, but maybe you should be more judgemental/cynical?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 04:15 AM
1

How and why do you think so? That's well within a margin of error. I have previously posted that men/women do the same amount of work +- 30 min. This says exactly that. What is your problem exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 02:38 AM
1

Glancing at the data it says women work 30 min more (paid+unpaid) a day in the west. That is not very noteworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 12:28 AM
1

Please don't be offended by me asking, but are you autistic? I don't understand why you ever thought this guy was your friend. Also, when you went out for lunch after tennis, who paid?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 11:17 PM
1

Please share them with the class.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 09:40 PM
1

It's PEW research, that is about as reputable a source as possible. The study is not "sus" it just doesn't confirm your biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 09:39 PM
5

Dude, WTF?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 07:28 PM
3

"I’ve only seen the multiple studies that say the opposite of that". They do, but those studies also ignore the hours spent at work in some way. Women do more housework, that is not really up for debate. However, women don't do more paid work+housework than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 07:22 PM
1

No, it would not because it is not a "relaxing activity".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 07:14 PM
1

I dont know, ask them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 07:01 PM
3

"On nonworkdays, fathers engaged in leisure 47% and 35% of the time during which mothers performed childcare and routine housework, respectively". What about the rest of the week? Also, "Our data came from the New Parents Project—a short-term, longitudinal study of 182 dual-earner couples experiencing the transition to parenthood". This is specifically about new parents, not couples in general. Also also, it's just measuring housework and childcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 06:56 PM
1

"So why didn’t they measure free time" I dont know, ask them. "Why wouldn’t scrolling through Reddit be exactly as much of a leisure activity as video games? " Because they somehow felt the need to separate free time from relaxing activities. "This is making me skeptical of the whole thing". The data is perfectly fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 06:50 PM
1

Direct quote from the article. "Free time is usually measured by the residual time after subtracting time spent in paid work, housework, child care, commuting and personal care, while leisure time is more about time spent in activities that relate to relaxation". Wasting 6 hours on Reddit would probably count as free time. Playing 6 hours of video games would be leisure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 06:42 PM
2

No problem
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 08:16 PM
2

"But this isn't about that, this is about average dudes" Then it's exactly the same as "just don't be poor bro". Ultimately, if you want to improve your lot in life you are going to have to put some time/effort into it. I agree with telling people to try their best because there is always something they could be doing to improve their predicament. That doesn't change the nature of the advice, which is "pull yourself up by the bootstraps".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 08:08 PM
1

Is just prime levels of false equivalence Bull, just because you don't want to make the comparison, doesn't make it a false equivalence. The incel-tier men make the same points as you do. They say "we are born short, ugly, weak jawed, high voiced and therefore have no ability to become above average".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 07:53 PM
3

Yep, it's literally the same thing. Working 10 hours overtime to pay off your credit card is no different from working out 10 hours to get in better shape, is no different from taking 1-2 classes a semester to get a degree for a good job. If telling people "stop being poor" is wrong, then telling people "stop being ugly" is equally wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 07:42 PM
2

Impoverished people often have no way out. Bull, you can just as "easily" get out of poverty as you can raise your attractiveness. Both take time, energy, and discipline. Both are possible for everyone. If you can "stop being average" you can stop being poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 07:39 PM
10

Same energy as "just stop being poor bro".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 07:22 PM
3

" the bio part is typically a waste of time" It's a complete waste of time. 100% of the women who matched with me asked me what my job is. My job is always on the bio. Not buried in a wall of text, but right there in the first or second sentence. Nobody bothers to read the bios, it's all about the pictures.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 06:53 PM
2

Each state makes its own laws regarding alcohol. This one is from Connecticut, but as far as I can tell, each state has a similar law in place.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 05:21 PM
2

The Liquor Control Act prohibits an alcoholic liquor permittees or their employees from providing alcohol to intoxicated persons (CGS § 30-86(b)(1)). Violations are punishable by up to a $1,000 fine, up to one year imprisonment, or both, for each offense (CGS § 30-113). In addition to these criminal penalties, DCP, through the Liquor Control Commission, may suspend or revoke a permittee's license to sell alcohol. DCP may also require the permittee's employees to participate in an alcohol seller …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 02:58 PM
8

"Have ever known a girl that lost 50lbs and got hotter" Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 06:33 AM
2

"Who said cold approaching was bad?" The neurotic, borderline autistic, women on Reddit say that all the time. Is this your first day here? It's a frequent topic of discussion on the various female-oriented subreddits.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 04:31 AM
2

What??? First of all, why are you having egg nog on the 18? Second of all, who the hell says that? I have literally never heard of this in my entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 04:25 AM
2

Yep, these guys are only "average" for handsome male celebrities.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 10:16 PM
2

Correction, FDS is the all negative aspects of women turned up to the max with non of the good parts to balance them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 08:40 PM
1

It's probably made up. Honestly, I don't even see how Mr. Shitstains would even be able to stay employed. Ragebait posts are mostly fake anyway. People will believe things that conform to their prejudices (me included) regardless of how plausible they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 08:04 PM
4

There is an ocean between "complacent" and "doesn't wipe his ass". Complacent is gained 10lbs and stopped picking up his socks, not doesn't shower, and leaves shitstains on the bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 08:00 PM
1

Feminist ragebait
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 07:29 PM
3

I know enough about the guy to not even bother reading his schlock. The guy is about as intellectually dishonest as they come. His only purpose for writing is to further his agenda. He will massage or fabricate whatever "facts" he needs to make his point and he will never admit to being wrong about something. Why would I waste my time reading any more of his garbage? If flyingkyte was not making things up, he should have been able to link to multiple TRP threads of guys "worshiping" Eliot Rogers…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 06:04 AM
3

Are you kidding me? You are linking me to a David Futrelle (Manboobs) article. I've read plenty of stuff by that guy. He is completely and utterly full of shit. He is the most disingenuous, dishonest, male feminist bullshiter that currently exists. The dude is infamous for how full of shit he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 06:56 PM
5

"many of these dudes worshipped Elliot Rogers". I'm going to call bullshit on that. I'm not redpill, but I did lurk on their subreddit for a while a couple of years ago and I've never seen this supposed Elliot Rogers worship.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 06:23 PM
1

They have stabbings instead. How is that better?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 06:41 PM
7

Definitely not into the steroid bodies. Anything naturally attainable is generally attractive, but women on gear are not my thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 04:35 AM
1

No, I do not agree with that professor at all. I think he is projecting. Feminist men with strong negative opinions of men usually turn out to be scumbags who think all other men are like them. Cheaters think everyone is a cheater, male feminist professors think all men are just as messed up in the head as they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 02:46 AM
1

The argument that online dating is hard for men is based on other data, such as swipes, likes, and message response rates. As for “average” you can narrow it down to a specific age range or state if you would like. It wouldn’t change things that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 06:45 PM
1

I completely disagree that it's not clearly defined and easily provable. The average guy is 5 foot 9 inches, 198 pounds, makes 57k, and looks somewhat like this. https://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil\_Fak\_II/Psychologie/Psy\_II/beautycheck/english/durchschnittsgesichter/durchschnittsgesichter.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 05:49 PM
1

Can you rephrase that slightly? I don't quite get what you are saying. Is saying "The average man can lift 135-175 lbs" aka the completely accurate statement disingenuous? Average is average, the guy making 150k is not average, guy lifting 500 lbs is not average.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 05:28 PM
1

We might be talking about a different "average" guy, but one of us is unequivocally factually wrong. The average man can lift 135-175 pounds, that is an accurate statement. Saying the average man can lift 500 pounds is factually wrong. If you are talking about a specific outlier segment of the population, you need to quantify it. If you don't then you are at fault for any misunderstandings.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 05:10 PM
5

Reject the girly types embrace tomboy supremacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 02:55 AM
1

You are being ridiculous. Why do people talk about losing weight like it's climbing Mt Olympus? You don't need a nanny and personal trainer to lose the baby fat. Losing weight is 80% diet. Go for an hour-long walk and cut down on high-calorie foods.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 10:56 AM
1

Very true, but it's no different for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 02:36 AM
3

Being jacked is a niche, being fit is not. People notice/comment that I'm in good shape, but nobody is going to be drooling over my muscles. Video games hurt guys' chances with women, not improve them. Also, like 50% of men play video games. That is not a niche by any means. Regular people don't fit into niches, 7SovarN is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 02:10 AM
1

Personally, I don't care for "mystery". I like direct and agreeable people. I don't want to deal with bullshit games.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 01:49 AM
3

What hypothetical niche do you suggest for a basic bitch guy like me? My life is work, video games, gym, tv.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 01:47 AM
1

Thanks for replying to my request.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 01:35 AM
1

Obviously not every tall guy is rich, I just meant that is not simply a matter of multiplying # tall+rich+muscular. Success in one area reinforces success in other areas. Regardless, 666 is obviously a tiny minority of guys. I literally don't know any guys that are more than two of the three.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 01:20 AM
2

I would totally turn down a promotion if it meant that I wouldn't be able to work out. Getting fat is absolutely terrible for your health and appearance. I'd rather take a pay cut than get fat. Temporary weight gain is expected on occasion, but becoming and staying fat would destroy my self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 01:13 AM
1

Normal BMI is not equivalent to making a 6 figure salary. You can have a gut and still be within a normal BMI. It's exactly the equivalent of making 50-60k a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 01:03 AM
1

I've been curious for a while now, how fat do you like your women? You obviously have a fetish, you talk about it incisively. Can you share a SFW picture of a woman you find attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 12:52 AM
1

A lot of factors are correlated with each other. If you are a tall man, you are disproportionately more likely to be a high earner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 12:48 AM
2

Women's standards are not on the floor for a relationship either. It's all bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 12:45 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtly\_love
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 12:40 AM
8

Ugly/fat women aren't going to be able to get every hot guy to have sex with them. Unlike some of the guys here, men generally have some standards. However, getting a random hot guy is not all that difficult. You will have a much easier time than an equally ugly guy, but men here tend to exaggerate how easy ugly women have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 12:38 AM
1

FDS is parasitic and predatory. They teach their members to never even compliment a man. Their entire shtick is to use and exploit men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 06:54 PM
1

If 50% of people were employed would you consider that a positive or a negative?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 06:32 PM
4

...failing birthrates is an actual problem in a welfare state. An upsidedown pyramid-shaped population (few young, many old) cannon sustain society as it is currently structured.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 06:51 PM
2

Imagine not valuing your own time and money.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 09:35 PM
2

I don't understand the point you are trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 09:32 PM
0

They are, but that is a completely worthless statement. People have a lot in common. We are not precious snowflakes. Without generalizations, we would be incapable of gathering information. Even signs and symptoms of heart attacks are generalizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 06:26 AM
0

So in your opinion, women chose men based on how good they are at chores?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 06:17 AM
1

I'm just going to call it a day and stop engaging with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:42 AM
1

"Men have never and will never adjust their behavior according to the wants of women." That is an absolutely insane statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:35 AM
1

You are not women, you are a woman. Once that seems to be an outlier among the population. You don't speak for all women. The minute women start valuing men based on their homemaking abilities, is the minute men start acting like Suzy homemakers. People respond to incentives, if men valued women's income over all else, a lot more women would be paying for dates instead of learning how to make themselves more attractive with makeup.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:29 AM
0

"But if they're not good at chores while they're living together: then the woman is never going to be ok with putting him in the position of housemaker." Why would they do that, if that is not what women want? It seems like you just want to act the contrarian. Your position seems to be "men bad". I don't see any nuance in your posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:19 AM
0

I don't think women care about men not being good at chores, at least up until they are living together. That is not how they choose their partners. You can't be angry that an ambitious, charismatic, tall, wealthy man is not Suzy homemaker. That is not why you picked him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:01 AM
0

I don't think enough men get the opportunity to try at being househusbands for you to generalize on how they perform.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 04:54 AM
2

"Then he's basically paying his way out of chores" That seems to be the way people prefer things to work. Women/men don't actually seem to want a 50/50 relationship for the most part. To me, it seems that women want a guy to bring home the bacon, but feel resentful of having to do more of the housework. They can't have their cake and eat it too. Personally, I would be perfectly happy with being a househusband. Women are not as enthusiastic about that arrangement. Women expect men to pay for date…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 04:37 AM
2

"That overtime doesn't have anything to do with me in a 50/50 relationship. It's just a burden." That is just your personal issue, not a men vs women issue. The vast majority of women definitely want men to earn that overtime money.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 04:24 AM
3

"that overtime pay doesn't end up in the relationship" How and why do you believe that? Do you expect men to work overtime and do 50% of the chores? That does not seem fair at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 04:12 AM
4

Nagging is definitely something people do. There is an art to asking for something/expressing yourself without coming off as an annoying asshole. When I was a kid my parents would often demand something in just the right way that I would absolutely never want to do it. I don't think men expect women to do 100% of the chores etc, but there is definitely a discrepancy between what we feel is needed to be done and when. I also think that just like women's contributions to the household, men's contr…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 03:52 AM
2

You are reading a lot of negativity into my post that just is not there. You have quite the chip on your shoulders regarding men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 03:40 AM
5

Their education/carrier would be a plus if they actually used it to their advantage. Beta bucks men would not work at all if beta bucks demanded to be financially supported. WTF is the point of your degree/career if you demand to be treated like a 50's stay-at-home housewife.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 03:33 AM
6

Generalizations can never fit 100% of the population. There will always be outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 03:29 AM
6

"confirm to male ideals" Be physically attractive, be pleasant to be around, make the guy feel desired and appreciated. No pain/discomfort required. That should be more than enough for 90% of the guys out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 03:28 AM
4

Tell your friend to use her words and ask for the things she wants like an adult, instead of getting mad that her BF took her at her word when she said that she doesn't want anything. She only has herself to blame. See, when I don't want anything I say "I don't want anything". When I do want something I say "I want X". It's a very simple process, I learned it when I was a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 11:28 PM
5

Lying is exactly what it is. It's also strangely manipulative behavior. Side note, if you get upset when people do exactly what you asked you are a bad person. Learn to communicate better or put up with not getting what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 11:21 PM
2

Because the justice system is far from infallible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 01:32 AM
2

Thanks for explaining it. I actually get that. If I'm playing X-COM and I need an attack to hit or my squad dies, I also pray to the random number generator gods. It obviously does nothing, but I still do it. It's some kind of placebo false sense of control thing. As long as you are not making life-altering decisions because a gypsy woman told you something, then I don't see a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 11:49 PM
1

So it's like a hobby? Do you know that it's fake and just enjoy the lore (for lack of a better term)?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 11:30 PM
1

I agree with you, but I don't think it blows up good relationships. I think there were already cracks that were papered up and this just gave the guy an "Aha!" moment. I don't think there would be a problem if the relationship is literally perfect and the woman is great at showing that she loves and is attracted to the guy. I think it's only a problem when the guy already had a feeling that she wasn't that into him.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 10:56 PM
1

So there is no way that a woman is just not that into you if she isn't as sexually adventurous with you? Do you think that never, ever happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 10:41 PM
1

" These are both valid decisions and not indicative of how you feel about your partner or how they feel about you". I mean, I can totally see myself not going the extra mile just because I don't like you as much. That is not at all difficult to imagine. You act like just because a person is with you they are automatically giving their all to make you happy. edit- I think I figured out a way to make you understand. I (hypothetically) am a slob. I never pick up my shit. My GF loves every part of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 10:32 PM
1

My question to you is, why do you like that stuff? I literally cannot comprehend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 10:25 PM
1

What kind of idiot statement is that? Do you want to do coke? Do you think doing coke with your husband going to bring you closer together? Would you feel that he loves you more if he does coke with you? This is like the 5th time you brought this up. WTF is the point you are trying to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 10:16 PM
1

Putting in a rape or incest clause in abortion rights would be an absolutely terrible idea regardless of where you stand on the issue. You are going to get a huge number of false rape accusations every year from women who want to have an abortion but can only do it if they accuse someone of rape. Honestly, even if you are morally opposed to abortion, getting rid of it is going to bring about such a huge mess of issues that there is no point in doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 05:23 PM
2

Yes, why not? Honestly, if my hypothetical BF bought cars for everyone except me, I would be kinda upset. Like, why not me specifically? What the hell?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 04:00 PM
1

I don't think it's too common, but it's definitely something that happens, especially to a certain subset of guys. It's like the whole "he was just using me for sex" thing women are constantly complaining about. No, most of the time he just learned that you weren't a good fit for him and moved on, but women have no way of knowing for certain. Risk-averse people imagine the worst possible scenario because they don't want to be used or hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 03:39 PM
1

Playing the guitar completely sucks for the first 2-3 months, I don't know what you are talking about. My fingers hurt like hell, it was utter shit. "I'm notatki degrading myself for my man's orgasm." You should have led with that, instead of bullshiting about pain and embarrassment. "I don't care", is a perfectly legitimate stance to take. No need to bullshit people with "it's painful and embarrassing".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 01:42 PM
0

Forty people literally die snowboarding each year.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 01:28 PM
2

WTF are you talking about? Skiing, snowboarding, surfing, playing an instrument, riding a bike, none of these things are fun the first, second, or third time you do it. You fall, you get hurt, you embarrass yourself, and it's a little scary. It is only after you put in some time and effort that you get any enjoyment out of these activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 01:27 PM
20

The problem is feminists do not want to share the spotlight, they see advocacy as a zero-sum game. Any time/attention spent on male issues is taken away from women's issues. I don't see feminists letting men advocate for men's issues unopposed anytime soon. Also, dismantling feminism is not the same thing as returning to patriarchy. Why would it be? The problem with feminism isn't women having rights, it's feminist theories and organizations. Women can still have rights without some women blamin…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 04:59 PM
2

Because nobody can have 100% of what they want 100% of the time. Compromises have to be made even in the best relationships. I really don't understand how you can't see the difference between "no" and 'not for you".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 10:13 AM
7

Military service was often another way to get the right to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 10:06 AM
3

Yes, why wouldnt that change things? Deception is involved because people lie about their history. They lie because its easier to justify not doing something your partner wants by saying they never did it with anyone and don't want to try. Women admit they will lie about their history on this very subreddit. People lie for their own benefit all the time. How is this new information?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 10:05 AM
24

Can I borrow some of your straw for my barn?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 09:45 AM
53

I don't think any men's movement can exist without pushing back against feminism. Feminism is inherently hostile to dealing with or examining men's issues unless it's through their warped lens. Obviously, not all feminists are like that, but generally, they fall into a few camps. They deny that men even have issues. They view bringing up men's issues as a cynical attempt to derail attention from women (who are the real victims). They believe that men are solely responsible for all of their own p…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 09:36 AM
1

Some things can become deal breakers in certain contexts, even if they weren't deal breakers in the beginning. Especially if deception is involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 09:18 AM
1

I wasn't singling out anyone in particular. I have absolutely no problem with you. I only have an issue with the FDS queens and the weirdos who post "men are rapists" 35 times a day regardless of topic. My point was that people post "I'm a rich upper class 10/10" while being a barely functioning human being regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 04:42 AM
1

Why specifically male liars? Half this sub is full of it regardless of gender. I've looked at the post histories of the self-proclaimed HVW on this sub, and have come across mental illness, defaulting on debts, and crying about how they are alone and have lost hope of ever finding love. This is the internet, assume everyone is at least somewhat full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 04:28 AM
5

Why do people here pretend that people don't compromise in relationships? Nobody is 100% satisfied 100% of the time. People sacrifice some things that they want because they get most of what they need to be happy. When they find out that an ex didn't have to make any kind of sacrifice they feel that they are not valued as much as the ex way. You have to be an alien not to understand where guys are coming from with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 03:39 AM
1

The strength training exercises are not the hard part. I've been doing it for 7 years and it's only a problem on the rare occasions I get absolutely swamped at work and can't make the time for a week. Problem is to get as slim as I want, I need to add another 30 min 3x a week on the rowing machine + cut out high-calorie junk food and alcohol completely. That is the hard part. Especially since whenever I manage to cut down to around 12% bodyfat, the goddamn gains goblin (mom who I visit twice a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 11:46 AM
1

Honestly, I found it much easier to be skinny than lean and muscular. It's was a lot less work just to play video games and forget to eat than it is to work out 3x a week and be as lean as I would like to be. Getting visible abbs is a pain in the ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 06:48 AM
1

In this one particular area, absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 06:37 AM
-1

Shave your head then, let us see your lumpy scalp.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 06:34 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTpgqqLyAs8
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:49 AM
0

I completely agree, but gaming is somehow even worse. The talent pool is of lower quality. The low stakes and job prestige allow for even more blatant bullshiterry.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 12:37 AM
2

It literally was, gaming journalism is a cesspit of failed writers, wannabe news journalists, and aging dudebros who hate their job, but lack the skills to do anything else with their lives. Plagiarism is rampant in the industry. So is cronyism and petty bribery.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 11:53 PM
2

Have studies actually shown that? Seems contrary to what I would expect. Men don't get baby rabies in their 30's.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 10:11 PM
1

How do men benefit from kids more than women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 10:09 PM
3

Gross
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 08:51 PM
6

obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 03:23 AM
5

If people were taught that killing was wrong, then anti-murder laws wouldn't even be needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 02:47 AM
1

You don't have to waste your time if you don't want to. I wasn't giving you homework. That said, if some kill all men, men bad, men are rapists posts is what you are missing in your life, a couple of days of browsing r/all should do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 01:42 AM
0

As I said, I have no idea how you managed to avoid it. Just browsing reddit/all for a couple of days is enough to come across it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 12:25 AM
16

It's probably very similar. Only difference is that women are more likely to put up with a high n count or infidelity to get a shot with a in demand guy. When it comes to infidelity, men care more about the physical act due to the risk of paternal uncertainty. Women care more about emotional infidelity due to the risk of losing access to the man's recourses if he leaves her for another woman. Men-Did you fuck him. Women-Do you love her. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXzTbCEqCJc&t=2459s
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 12:15 AM
3

The most obvious answer is that she just stopped mentioning her kid after getting ghosted repeatedly. After learning how much of a deal breaker it was to the kind of men she wants, her strategy is to wait until the guy is more invested before mentioning kids. A lot of men will never even message single mothers and will filter them out if the search results allow for it. I have absolutely no idea why you went straight into "her son died".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 11:47 PM
-1

It's everywhere on social media. I have no idea how you managed to avoid it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 11:19 PM
1

I don't quite understand what you are trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 11:15 PM
1

Let the women deal with her, she is their problem now.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 11:13 PM
2

Political lesbians?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 11:12 PM
5

NAWALT, but yes all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 10:21 PM
2

Persona 5 is a great game. Best out of the 3 persona games I've played.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 01:06 AM
1

You would be the equivalent to the guy with a modest Gundam figure collection. Not a big deal, but offputting to some people. Easily ignored if the guy is into you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 12:53 AM
1

I'd say that anybody making around 1.5x the woman salary can, but not necessarily has to fall into the betabux category. You don't need to be rich to be a betabux. A working-class guy can be betabux to a single mom. If money is at least 50% of the reason the woman is with the guy, he is betabux. There are no hard and fast rules for who qualifies as betabux. It's like porn, you know it when you see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 12:44 AM
1

How old are you and is your bedroom pink?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 12:09 AM
0

Having high standards is one thing, saying things like 150k is average is an objective denial of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 10:58 PM
2

The kind of world where the "average" means 120k-150k salary.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 09:10 PM
5

That is not the general belief here, that is just your strawman version of it. People here don't say women are shit and men are great. They say average women think they deserve better than they are worth. Pricing yourself out of the market ultimately leads to both the buyer and seller being unhappy. The seller because he has not made a sale and the buyer because they don't have what they need. Men here are just saying be realistic and don't demand a Tesla on a Honda Civic budget. They aren't say…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 08:01 PM
3

Just because you haven't heard of it, doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. People lie about never doing something to make it easier to accept that they don't want to do it now. That is a thing that people do. You are being needlessly pedantic. I give up on this conversation. It's like talking to a brick wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 06:30 AM
3

How and why does that not change things? Especially when the "assumptions" people incorrectly make are due to being lied to or misled. How is being lied to your fault? I can live without going fishing with my Dad. It's not that big a deal that Dad says he doesn't like fishing. Yesterday I learned that Dad went fishing with my sibling every Sunday for years. How does that not change our relationship? (fake scenario)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 06:02 AM
3

There is literally no person on the planet who is so perfect that you don't need to compromise with them. Everyone gives up on some things that they want to be with someone who is otherwise a good fit. Sometimes they learn that they gave up something that others got freely. That recontextualizes the relationship. Nobody likes getting a worse deal. There is no way that you can't possibly understand it. Hell, I got miffed last week when the thing I bought earlier went on sale for less than I paid …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 05:46 AM
3

Does it matter if they actively got "screwed over" if the end result is that they are getting played less than their peers? Fuck good natured people who don't want to rock the boat, I guess. Serves them right for not looking out for number one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 04:49 AM
3

Anything and everything is your fault with that kind of logic. Let's say you are right and it is their fault. Why are they wrong for getting a new, better paying job now that they know what they could have been earning?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 04:26 AM
3

So I guess that if you are unhappy with your job because you found out that you are being underpaid compared to your peers, that is unhealthy. It was your mistake for not doing your research. People can be happy enough until new information recontextualizes their circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 04:01 AM
3

Do you know many people who treat their partners worse than their exes?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 02:30 AM
5

Regardless of what you say, I sincerely doubt that you will be happy with either of my scenarios. That is not how humans function. Even monkeys get upset about unequal treatment. We are built that way for a reason. Even jealousy has some evolutionary purpose. It's one thing to be an insecure mess, it's entirely another to not care about how you are treated in comparison to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 12:53 AM
4

So you would be perfectly happy with your husband treating you worse than his ex, as long as he treats you well enough? I don't believe that for a minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 12:16 AM
4

Really? Would you still be happy with your paycheck if you knew that your coworker was being paid 2x what you are making at the same job you are both working?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 12:05 AM
0

Nobody is entitled to anything, at all. People don't really need or deserve anything. You can live in poverty just as easily as you can live with loneliness. Either people can complain about things that they lack in their lives, or they can't. You are making weird distinctions and justifying your opinion by phrasing people's desires in a negative way. As if people are demanding the government provide "comfort women" when they say they lack physical intimacy. Why are you even care about this? You…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 11:44 PM
1

Nobody cares about your strawman arguments. Everything sounds bad if you phrase it that way. Person 1-It's difficult living in poverty. Person 2- You're not entitled to steal other people's money just to buy yourself an iPhone!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 11:15 PM
2

Eugenics obviously only applies to low-value men. How do you not know that? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 11:08 PM
1

Take some vitamins. Do you think that isolation and lack of physical intimacy don't increase stress or cause depression? My point is you are being an idiot, what is your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 11:04 PM
1

You don't need much of anything to live beyond 2 liters of water, 2k calories worth of potatoes, and a bunk bed in a room that you share with 500 people. What is your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 10:58 PM
1

Why the hell did you think that was the age range he was talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 10:51 PM
1

Paternal uncertainty is part of the reason women had less freedom historically. The other part is women's need/desire for protection. Step 1-its unsafe outside, men need to protect women. Step 2- Men are forced to chaperone women when outside the home so that nothing bad happens to them. If something bad does happen to a woman, it's the fault of the nearest male figure connected to her. Step 3- Women aren't allowed to be outside by themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 05:16 AM
1

It's not a bot, hedonism bot is a character from futurama.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 05:02 AM
1

Yep, sometimes it was granma. Sometimes it was the local lord, sometimes it was dad, sometimes it was the couple. The level of outside involvement also depended on the time and place. Even arranged marriages usually involved the input of the couple in question. Also, men were sometimes forced into marriages they didn't want for the benefit of the extended family. The world is a huge place and recorded human history is a long time, things changed constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 04:32 AM
1

Unlike the PPD women, obviously. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 03:38 AM
3

Jurassic Bark was so sad they had to retcon it to give the dog a happy ending.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 11:24 PM
94

I completely agree with you. To use a job analogy, 90% of the effort is getting your foot in the door. When people ask "How do I get a job" they are asking for resume tips and how to make a good impression at the interview. They are asking what the in-demand specialties currently are and who is hiring. Somehow, women here have decided that what men really need is advice on how to be a good employee at the job they've been working in for 5 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 07:50 PM
1

"New kid" by the Old 97's
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 04:04 PM
1

Gay people are fine, people with pronouns in their bio are cringe. Latinx is also cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 04:57 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 04:44 PM
3

I didn't know that ahead of time. By the time I realized, I was in too deep to stop. Honestly, I'm partly to blame for getting sucked up in debating MR. I-reject-reality-and-substitute-it-with-my-own. This is not the first time I've argued with someone like that and it won't be the last. I think that might make me the idiot here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 06:23 AM
1

Congratulations Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 04:57 AM
1

How many men fucked your wife last week?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 04:18 AM
0

The top 20% of the wealthy don't control all the money either just 86% of it. Seems similar to the mythical Chad. The top 20% of sexually successful men don't hoard all the women 24/7, the bottom 80% still get the leftovers. Everyone can improve their finances if they tried. Even a teenager can earn a paycheck, so nobody has an excuse to complain like money is "some great fucking problem". I'm perfectly fine with that, I just figured you wouldn't be. Seems like we are on the same page. The artic…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 03:46 AM
3

Dude stop, you're embarrassing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 10:56 PM
7

Did you even look at that website? 35.5% of people aged 25-34 are obese. That is not even including the people who are just overweight. How is that proving me wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 10:39 PM
4

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db360.htm Look at the CDC statistics, genius. "Prevalence of obesity among adults aged 20 and over, by sex and age: United States, 2017–2018". "Crude estimates are 42.5% for total, 43.0% for men, and 42.1% for women".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 10:23 PM
6

Sure thing bro, I'm just gonna trust your anecdotes over the CDC. The statistic is 20 years out of date. I'm not gonna look for something more recent because you don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 09:53 PM
8

Thanks for not taking it personally. I don't bother with Red Pill stuff in my personal life, but all the "I'm different so you're wrong" posts here have been grating on me. Also, being weird is not necessarily bad, I'm weird too. It's just not useful to take the outliers into account when strategizing. Otherwise, financial advisors would be telling people to YOLO their life savings on GME options. Hey, there is at least 1 guy who became a millionaire that way so you can't say it's bad advice!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 09:40 PM
3

Then I'm sure you will have no problem elaborating on that statement. How is it a false equivalence? Why is being sexually average a personal problem, but being economically average a societal problem? Financial security is in your hands. Get a marketable skill, go into a in-demand profession, live below your means, invest. It's perfectly doable. I'm doing it right now. I've also been working out for years, I see absolutely no difference between investing time in your appearance and investing ti…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 09:34 PM
6

https://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/r041027.htm Literally 10 seconds of google would get you that result. This statistic is a bit outdated. People are even fatter now. "Women aged 20-29 were nearly 29 pounds heavier on average in 2002 compared to 1960".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 09:27 PM
20

You know perfectly well that you are a weirdo. I'm not saying that to offend you in any way, but people who are not the neurotypical basic-bitch bro/girls should be ignored when talking about human dating behavior. If we take all the weird outliers into account when talking about every subject, we would be incapable of knowing/predicting anything. Red pill is the index fund investor of the sexual marketplace. They are not trying to beat the market with crazy 50x investment strategies that are do…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 08:30 PM
7

Why do people care about income inequality and rising costs of living? Just get off your lazy ass and work overtime.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 08:20 PM
4

The average woman's level of attractiveness has gone down. The average woman is 40 pounds fatter today than women were 60 years ago. Gaining 40 pounds is enough to put most people from fit to the obese category. Granted, men are also fatter so that kind of evens out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 08:08 PM
1

I recommend against it. While skipping one class is not a big deal, it will do nothing to help with how crappy you are feeling. Try not to talk yourself into making bad decisions for momentary benefit. Just force yourself to be productive until the mood passes. Don't skip school, gym, or work.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 01:48 AM
1

To me, it just sounds like you are making elaborate excuses to date guys you know are dangerous. It’s bizarre.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 07:36 PM
1

What guys here know is that these types of men have more red flags than a Soviet Union parade. Stop pretending otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 07:17 PM
2

There is no need to be able to predict the future. If a trap works on bears it will work just as well on human feet. Only an idiot sticks his foot in a bear trap and goes “but it’s a bear trap, I’m not a bear, how was I supposed to know it would hurt”. You are free to do whatever you want as long as you don’t pretend that you were tricked. If you like violent men because they make you “feel protected”, date them all you want. Just don’t pretend you didn’t know what you were getting into.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 07:14 PM
1

Seriously, why are you trying to convince people that sticking your foot in a bear trap is totally a good idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:56 PM
1

Why are you trying to convince everyone that sticking your foot in a bear trap is actually a good idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:44 PM
3

I don't think you understand how dumb that sentence is. Assholes are assholes, just because you aren't in their crosshairs today, doesn't mean that you won't be tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:40 PM
1

If you need a bribe to spend time with someone, either you don't like them or are just entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:33 PM
3

You don't need a crystal ball to know that a guy like this will be violent. This is some kind of weird cope. "Sure Jonny gets drunk and picks bar fights with guys half his size as a hobby, but there's no way that he will ever be violent with me". If the guy is violent towards other guys, he is going to turn that anger and violence on you one day. People are stupid and will convince themselves into making bad decisions for short-term pleasure. That's why hangovers are a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:18 PM
1

That makes it sound worse, not better. "I really don't like you, but if you bribe me, maybe I might reconsider".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 04:26 PM
1

From what I remember most of the stories have lying in them. At best, they have lies of omission. If the writer is a woman, they justify their lies with "I've changed, I was so ashamed of my past, I was so in love that knew I had to lie or lose him forever, It was tearing me apart the entire time!". That makes them more sympathetic to female readers. If the writer is a man they write "I'm a good Christian/Muslim/Hindu boy who was a virgin until marriage and my wife lied to me about her past!". T…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 03:19 AM
1

Most of those stories are creative writing, but the common element is usually that the women knew that their boyfriends/husbands would disapprove of their sexual history and purposefully hid it from them. Often explicitly lying when asked about their sexual history. Lying is usually part of the story because it adds to the drama. Personally, I lay all my cards on the table if asked about something explicitly. Though, that is partly because I no longer care about what people think. Partly, it's b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 02:18 AM
2

I completely agree that 95% of those stories are creative writing exercises.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 02:01 AM
2

Honestly, I think 70% of those relationships could have been salvaged if the woman was honest from the beginning. The lying just makes everything worse. It makes it seem like they were being purposefully manipulative. I would 100% dump someone for lying to my face just to make themselves look better, even if it wasn't that big of a deal originally. Let's say I had some strong hang-ups about alcohol or something. If a woman sat down and said that she used to be an alcoholic (or a distiller or som…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 01:58 AM
6

What a bizarre and nonsensical post. What's up with you and gay sex? This is like the 30th time you tried to use it as some kind of weird gotcha. If having casual sex was just as repulsive to women as homosexual sex is to heterosexual men, then why do some women do it? Are they all being tricked? Every single one of them? Did they walk into a bar and stumble on a dick? Some women don't want to have casual sex, so they don't. Some women do and benefit from having that option. They lose nothing fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 06:22 AM
1

At one point it was my favorite. I liked it a lot but it's very slow to get going. It takes almost an entire season for everything to click into place creatively. That said, I kind of lost interest sometime during the final season. I don't remember if I got tired of it or if it dropped in quality. What I like most about it is how grounded a lot of it was. I think it took almost a full season of buildup for one naval battle. They also spent several episodes on political conflict related to the oc…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:25 AM
1

Ok, you've convinced me to put it on my watchlist. I give it a 5% chance that I'm ever going to get to it. I still have the last episode of Black Sails on there and it came out in 2014.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 01:56 AM
0

"Two business executives--one an avowed misogynist, the other recently emotionally wounded by his love interest--set out to exact revenge on the female gender by seeking out the most innocent, uncorrupted girl they can find and ruining her life." I'm not at all interested in watching that. First of all, it's a movie, not real life. Second of all, it sounds like pure undiluted oppression porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 01:32 AM
6

If you are a below-average woman, why would you think that a universally desired man is interested in you beyond a quicky? What do you possibly have to offer? This is a falling for pyramid schemes level of naivety. Do you seriously believe women are so out of touch with reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 12:29 AM
6

That is like saying the old, obese, millionaires don't know that the supermodels aren't really attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 11:55 PM
9

I hate the whole "attractiveness is a subjective" argument. If people's preferences were entirely without commonalities there would be no cosmetic, entertainment, or food industry whatsoever. Sure people like slightly different things, but we have a lot more in common than not. Otherwise, there would be literal human feces for sale at restaurants and Steven Hawkings would be on the cover of at least a few sexiest man alive magazines. Some people think the Godfather is the greatest movie of all t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 11:47 PM
23

If guys routinely walker around in toupees, platform shoes, fake muscle shirts, and makeup, there would be a lot more "handsome" men out there. At least until they take a shower and get undressed. Fortunately/unfortunately women are a lot more critical of men hiding their physical flaws than men are of women doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 11:35 PM
14

Honestly, having options is always better than not having them. You are always free to choose not to exercise those options if you have them available.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 11:24 PM
3

One wall punching boyfriend is chance, two is a coincidence, three is a pattern. There are not enough wall punching, love-bombing, abusive men running around for you to be that unlucky that often. You have a type and that type is an impulsive, violent, abusive man. You like the drama, you like the excitement that comes with dating guys like that. You just hate the metaphorical hangover that comes afterward. As for your other comment, a guy getting screwed over by a vindictive ex-wife post-divorc…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 09:20 PM
3

It's a pattern I've seen with misandrist women. They spew toxic manhating rhetoric all day long, then go chasing after dirtbags come Friday night. Normal men are literally invisible eunuchs to them. Only violent, impulsive, narcissists are on their radar. They are like alcoholics or drug addicts that hate their addiction, but can't stand living without the high they get from it. They know those guys are destroying their lives, they know they would be happier in the long term with a normal guy, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 09:06 PM
3

You are 100% filtering for those types of guys. You are the common denominator in this equation. One wall punching boyfriend is chance, two is a coincidence, three is a pattern. These are the types of men you are attracted to. These are the men you choose to be with. You need to stop blaming all men for your own maladaptive sexual preferences. ​ Edit- Saw you edited your post. Your snide comment about my username is not the gotcha you think it is. It was randomly generated by Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:48 PM
5

If 3/4 of your boyfriends are punching walls that is 100% on you. You are actively filtering for those character traits. That said, I am not surprised. Misandrist always seems to be attracted to the toxic dirtbags. The only problem is they try to blame all men for their maladaptive sexual preference. You are a walking stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:34 PM
19

I've heard a showrunner explain that the "fat guys with hot wives" is done to pander to the female viewers. It's the same reason why commercials always have the dumbass husband who fails at a basic life task being shown the better way (using the marketed product) of doing it by his attractive, smart wife. The marketers know which side their bread is buttered on and its the women buying their products.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 07:59 PM
2

Paypal me 500$ a month and I will psychically shield you from the tragedy. I am totally legit and not at all a scam, honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 10:55 PM
1

Women are temporary, compound interest is forever. On a more serious note, no sane individual wants to finance someone else's lifestyle. There is a near 0% chance that a foodie who loves to travel does not expect her boyfriend to pay for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 10:38 PM
1

I meant something more direct. For example, "I'm getting the impression that you might like to be more than friends, I would like that as well". Provided you actually feel that way. Saying something like "We're just friends right?" sounds kind of accusatory. It sounds like you don't want to be more than friends and would be offended if they tried anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 11:04 PM
1

If you know the guy likes you, why not say something and save you both some time and energy?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 10:30 PM
2

At my gym, all the gym bros are playing video games. All of them, even the personal trainers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 05:02 AM
1

She is very obviously trying to fatten him up a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 04:34 AM
2

That is simply because they go back to their previous habits.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 03:57 AM
1

TIL racism was invented 400 years ago by white people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 03:25 AM
1

"FDS says they value men who treat them with kindness, etc. They even associate and Co opt the terms high value with men who are good to them". Show me where they do this. Find me 4 posts of them encouraging their members to return gestures of kindness. They literally rail against reciprocity, it's all take and no give. Unless you're insinuating that they "value" high-value men the same way I "value" a beast of burden. You are obviously just trolling for drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 01:18 AM
1

They literally have posts warning members to never even compliment a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 01:10 AM
5

Somehow, I get the feeling that marrying a stripper might be the smarter decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 12:24 AM
1

I think you are looking for an excuse to remain close-minded. You are bent on attributing hidden malaise to everything I'm saying. I don't see why you are so intent on making enemies out of potential allies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 04:39 PM
1

Not if they are purposely trying to insult someone who is just minding their own business. If they just hold some outdated opinions but don't actually do anything then I don't see the point of needlessly antagonizing them. Around someone like that, just acting like a decent person is enough to get them to see things your way 90% of the time. I honestly can't understand how you think people who want to be left alone are automatically evil. That mentality is alarming to me. If this was a different…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 04:16 PM
1

I think you have radicalized yourself to the point where you can no longer tolerate the company of regular people. If politics is really important to you, know that you are only hurting your cause by rejecting people who "only" agree with you 90% of the time and would rather be left alone to mind their own business. You honestly sound like a religious fanatic to me. I don't understand how you can't see that. I guess this is as far as this conversation is going to get. Unfortunately, we are proba…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 03:41 PM
1

I think your attitude is immature, narrow-minded, and ultimately self-defeating. Also, not wanting to shove politics into every conversation is not some kind of sneaky excuse to secretly hold evil opinions. It's the equivalent of not wanting the waiter to start preaching the bible at you when you sit down for dinner. If you don't mind me asking, how old are you, yearly 20?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 03:25 PM
0

Just as many as those that affect yours. Listen, you're never going to convince me that the crazy people foaming at the mouth over Fox News or Left-Wing Media are correct. I have changed my opinion on more than one issue simply by listening to the opposition and examining their line of reasoning. Not everyone who disagrees with you is an evil moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 10:58 AM
0

I am capable of being friends with people I disagree with because I am an adult. People who disagree with me politically aren't automatically evil. I also don't automatically "detest" people just because they have different opinions than me. Because I am a functioning human being and not a crazy person.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 06:11 AM
1

I was close! I appreciate the honest reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 06:06 AM
0

That's like saying atheists shouldn't care about religion. Sure, maybe after 10 years most atheists stop caring and talking about organized religion, but people who have recently decided to leave their religion care a lot. Partly due to needing to justify their decision, partly to convince others to join them, and partly because they are leaving the door open to rejoin their religious community. New MGTOW want to be convinced that they are wrong and that women are worth the risk of getting hurt.…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 05:53 AM
1

No true Scotsman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 05:35 AM
-1

That is about as accurate as saying being a Catholic is just about loving your neighbor. There is an entire ideology behind feminism that goes beyond wanting women to have rights. Feminism is believing in patriarchy, rape culture, toxic masculinity, the male gaze, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 05:18 AM
3

Are you a chubby white woman with blue hair and horn-rimmed glasses?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 05:07 AM
1

People who can't get along with someone purely because of a difference in politics are insufferable and mentally unwell. The same goes for those who bring politics into every conversation. If you can't have dinner like a normal person, you need to delete social media and get a hobby.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 05:04 AM
2

Then that guy does have to be put on a registry. Edit- If that guy had to be dragged out of the ladies' room, why did you phrase it like he walked in, said "ops" then turned around and left? How would anyone have known he had to be escorted out based on what you said?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 03:18 AM
3

I recall at least two separate occasions where women have accidentally entered the men's bathroom that i was using. Clearly, this is something that never happens by accident and these women should be put on the sex offenders registry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 03:09 AM
1

The chart seems accurate based on my weight and level of fitness. I would consider myself an intermediate lifter and what I currently deadlift is right between intermediate and advanced on the chart. Though, to be honest, I lost all perspective of what is heavy and who is in shape after a few years of lifting.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 09:38 PM
1

You are having imaginary conversations in your head about things that I never said or even implied. You have lost your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 01:18 AM
1

Where did I say anything remotely like “women fuck men over in court, men oppressed by the divorce court, fuck the system”? Where did I say "men are oppressed"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 01:08 AM
1

You are having imaginary conversations in your head about things that I never said or even implied. You have lost your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 01:03 AM
1

You are the female equivalent of the autistic, neckbeard, incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 01:02 AM
1

I said absolutely nothing about being "oppressed". I said you are full of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 01:00 AM
1

I just read your post history, should have done that before I wasted my time talking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 12:55 AM
3

There is literally zero chance that even the crappies, dumbest, most inept public defender would lose a case like this. The more you post the more I'm convinced you are full of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 12:50 AM
2

Broke women can get a state appointed lawyer or even get their ex-husband to foot the bill for a private one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 12:45 AM
2

Then why not sue them for child support? Why are these broke housewives not suing them for back child support?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 12:43 AM
3

Broke women can get a state appointed lawyer or even get their ex-husband to foot the bill for a private one. Seriously, how did this happen? Hell, there is a good chance that they can get a lawyer today, get their ex-husband to pay for that lawyer, and sue him for back child support plus interest with the lawyer that he is paying for. The only way those guys are going to avoid paying is if they are willing to live like illegal immigrants working for cash under the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 12:02 AM
7

The women on Reddit seem to live in some sort of parallel reality. It's the only explanation for some of the things they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 11:56 PM
7

Welcome to equality. That honestly sucks for you, hopefully, it was temporary.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 11:51 PM
5

While the world is a large place and anything is possible, I just cannot believe that you are telling the truth. Two housewives didn't even get child support? I literally do not believe a word of it unless they specifically did not request any alimony/child support, or if neither of them has any custody.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 11:48 PM
2

There are literally hundreds (maybe thousands) of articles written by women whining about loneliness and isolation, with new ones being written every single day.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 10:29 PM
1

Are you serious? So I take it you are fine with accepting that single fathers are just better parents than women? Because both statistics are true for the same reason, self-selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 10:17 PM
2

Yes, the rich and middle class marry disproportionately to the poor. That is in large part responsible for the difference in wealth. It's the same reason why single fathers are statistically much better parents. They need to be a much better choice than their ex-wife to get custody. That's why the statistics are so skewed in their favor compared to single mothers. If they didn't have a lot going in their favor they wouldn't get custody in the first place. They also need to have money to fight fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 10:00 PM
1

That distinction makes absolutely no difference. Why wouldn't a group of people who were already wealthier compared to their peers not continue accumulating wealth? The statistic is this "poor Americans are almost three times more likely to cohabit, and working-class Americans are twice as likely to cohabit, compared with their middle- and upper-class peers age 18–55". The poor are statistically 3X more likely to move in together without officially getting married. There are similar statistics f…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 09:43 PM
12

Poor people are 3 times more likely to cohabitate compared to their middle and upper-class peers. That is why married men make more money. They were disproportionately upper and middle-class men before they got married. Marriage in and of itself did not make them magically wealthier compared to their cohabitating peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 08:05 PM
21

They do not earn more money because they get married. Wealthier people get married much more often than poor people. This is a wet roads cause rain type of statistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 05:36 PM
9

/s?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 12:50 PM
1

Using the tools available to you to improve your quality of life is very logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 10:46 AM
9

People who ask for a source more than once are just telling you to shut up. They don't care about the actual source and will ignore one if posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/21 10:52 PM
1

I don't think you understood what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 08:18 PM
2

You and bird are the only ones who brought race into the conversation, chastising imaginary bigots to feel morally superior. We live in a welfare state, population decline will bring about various economic issues. That is what people were talking about when you started chastising imaginary bigots.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 05:46 PM
1

You are the one who didn’t read. The article is not the full study. The article is 5 “myths” by some guy who probably skimmed the abstract from the study to make a clickbait article. That is not the same thing. I would need to read the full study to know what is true. I would also have to read how they collected data and what type of data they collected and the limitations of the study. I don’t have the time or inclination to do that today. That is what I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 05:28 PM
0

It's not a great idea to use random opinion news articles to make a scientific argument. Journalists often don't understand studies and pick a couple of points that catch their attention to write about without examining the important details of the study. That is why we have dozens of "highschool girl cures cancer" articles a year. I'm not going to spend too much time looking into this today, but there is almost zero chance that getting married negatively affects women's lifespan. Childbirth is …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 02:44 PM
1

"Poor Americans are almost three times more likely to cohabit, and working-class Americans are twice as likely to cohabit, compared with their middle- and upper-class peers age 18–55." Correlation is not causation. Poor people don't get married as much as middle and upper class people. It's not marriage that is making these men live longer and happier lives. They were already wealthier.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 01:36 PM
1

I would love to be able to sign something that would allow me to be euthanized under a few specific circumstances. I don't see the point of living if I'm basically a vegetable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 01:23 PM
1

It's pretty obvious that you and flightlessbird are bigots. Don't pretend that you have the moral high ground just because your type of bigotry is in vogue right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 10:08 AM
0

Just because a guy pays for a date, doesn't mean that he won't ghost you. Guys who "pump and dump" see paying as a kind of "cost of doing business". It increases their chance of having sex so they see it as a necessary expense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 08:58 PM
1

That is highly unrealistic in today's environment. Men would have to restrict themselves to only asking women out at work or in their friend circle. This is a good way to get in trouble with HR or get called a "nice guy" who was only pretending to be friends to get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 08:46 PM
1

A relationship can grow without spending money on people you barely know. Do you buy gifts and dinner for random acquaintances because someday the relationship might grow and they might become your friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 08:35 PM
3

I wonder if that type of logic would hold for gym memberships and fancy cars? Women have to pay for dates because men are forced to buy expensive cars and pricy gym memberships to appeal to women. Do women want to be picked up in an old beater? No, then they need to pay for the date because the guy had to buy a fancy car to pick them up in. I don't believe that kind of nonsense, but it seems to line up with the FDS way of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 08:25 PM
1

There is no relationship, we aren't talking about you and your husband. We are talking about the initial stages of dating. At that stage, neither person knows each other well or cares about them very much. Do you buy gifts and dinner for random work acquaintances? This is the level of familiarity we are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 08:17 PM
0

Why are you giving feminism credit for scientific and medical progress?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 03:23 PM
1

Yep, gym people are usually nice. I've never seen anyone make fun of people in any of the gyms I've been to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 11:18 PM
1

You are a random idiot on the internet, not a college professor. You don't get to demand a thesis. Especially since you are going to ignore anything you don't agree with. I will only waste my time by giving in to your petty demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 11:04 PM
1

How about no. I think you are being purposefully obtuse and there is no point in arguing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:54 PM
1

Being obtuse
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:51 PM
1

Are you doing this on purpose? What power? What are you talking about? Do you live in Afghanistan?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:49 PM
1

The average man was not a craftsman or a yeoman. The average man was a serf. Also, why in the hell would you want to be a man today? There is literally nothing that you will gain from the trade. Edit-If a man wanted to be a blacksmith he would have had to do the same thing. Only he would be able to start a family afterward and would not have to struggle to work while nursing a bunch of kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:43 PM
1

I'm on the fence about it. I'm too used to being a guy so I wouldn't trade it for anything short of upper-class luxury. With that said if I was a woman I doubt that I would want to be a man either. The thing about being a woman is that almost regardless of time/place you could have forged your own path if you really wanted to while you were obligated to do so as a man. There were female craftsmen and business owners. It was just not a particularly cushy path to walk for a small (potential) payou…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:33 PM
1

I would rather be "treated like a child" than drafted or sent to debtors' prison and I'm not the only one who thinks that way. Like 75% of the reason women did not have the same rights as men (when men had any rights at all) in the past was that outside a small minority of women, they mostly did not want to risk losing these protections in exchange for more equal treatment. This is not something women universally wanted for all of history and were denied. This is like the abortion debate now, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:06 PM
1

Women needed a guardian to sign contracts because they could not be forced to honor those contracts. You needed to get a guy on the hook in case the woman defaults on a loan. There was also lots of weird stuff like women being able to work but were under no obligation to pay taxes (husband had to pay taxes for them and was not even allowed to officially ask how much she made) or contribute to the family finances. So yes, women had fewer rights, but they also had fewer obligations. You also had s…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 08:37 PM
2

Your obesity is showing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:59 PM
1

Define "some extra pounds", give me a number.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:17 PM
1

She is morbidly obese. Nobody who is morbidly obese is a 5. She is a 3 or so, it's hard to rate very unattractive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:10 AM
8

Exhibit A
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 02:10 AM
10

If it makes you feel better half the women here are legitimately not right in the head. I know hearing "grandma has dementia" doesn't make dealing with her easier, but try not to take it personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 02:00 AM
1

What part of this is a stupid waste of time and money do you not understand? What do you suggest we sacrifice to teach these guys military training or do we simply add another 4+ hours of after-school activities? If you just want to make people fit there are other much better ways to do so. Ways that don't involve wasting years of people's time. My father was an officer in a country with mandatory conscription. He will personally tell you that it was a waste of time and energy. All it accomplish…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 01:50 AM
1

If they are armed and trained then it is a waste of money and time. If they are not then they are useless. Conscription is out of fashion for a reason. Most people contribute more to the military with their taxes than they ever could with their bodies. Any time spend training these kids would be better served to educate them in a useful skill.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 12:12 AM
1

Are you talking about people here or out in the real world? Here people can be critical of women. In the real world, it's a different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 11:52 PM
0

Do they all have guns? Are they trained to use them? Will they actually defend their country if called to do so? If not then it's pointless to even mention it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 11:32 PM
0

I would do nothing to solve the obesity crisis unless you force everyone into the army reserve for life. Unless you think that everyone who ever played sports in high school stays fit for the rest of their life. A tax on fat people like Japan would be a better idea. Either that or some kind of tax exemption for people who pass a yearly fitness/physical exam. People aren't going to be happy with that idea though since it will disproportionately hit poor/elderly people. As for the militia, that is…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 09:49 PM
1

If it’s compulsory then it’s mandatory. If it’s not compulsory then there is no difference between what you are proposing and how things are now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 07:49 PM
2

Will men be in any way compensated for this forced self improvement?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 07:25 PM
6

That would be a terrible waste of people’s time and resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 05:54 PM
1

Presumably the bartender is the GF in this scenario so I do care.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 07:10 PM
1

If the bartender is my friend and he is giving away free drinks all his friends but me then yes I will be miffed and rethink our friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 06:32 PM
1

My satisfaction with getting what I want is dependent on the price and effort I had to go through to get it. I'll be somewhat satisfied with crappy beer if it was free. If I had to pay $25 for the same crappy beer I would be unhappy. If someone gave away free beer while demanding that I pay $25 a bottle and do 100 pushups I would be pissed. Same with work. If I had to do the same job for twice the pay I would be happy, if I got a pay cut I would be pissed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 04:44 PM
1

I'm not racist, I just hate black people. It's just a preference. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 03:56 AM
1

If you are playing sports and biking to work you are exercising more than 75 minutes a week. Are you doing this on purpose? Edit-changed day to week
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 02:19 AM
1

That is the bare minimum to maintain good cardiovascular health and prevent muscle atrophy. 75 minutes a day is good for you, it will under no circumstances make you look fit. You can exercise for 75 minutes a week all you want, nobody will ever notice the difference. You will look "skinny fat" at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 02:06 AM
1

I assumed you weren't shitposting nonsense. It was my fault for taking you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 01:47 AM
1

No, it shouldn't. You have no idea what you are talking about. Either that or your definition of "fit" is vastly different than most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 01:45 AM
4

I've had a conversation with a woman here who claimed to not care if a guy is wealthy. She thought that 125k was around average. She literally never look at a statistic in her entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:33 PM
2

There are way more women into jacked dudes than there are jacked dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:24 PM
1

Have you ever exercised in your life? One hour a week is nothing. If you exercise one hour a week every week for two years nobody would even notice a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:20 PM
–

What was considered "fat" a couple of generations ago is now normal. The models aren't getting thinner, the average person is just getting fatter. Instead of fat acceptance we should be trying to reverse the trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 07:16 PM
–

Thanks for clarifying, I took a look at subreddit drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 04:54 PM
–

Can you elaborate on the mask slippage?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 02:37 AM
–

You want grown men to take advice from a 19 year old idiot on steroids? Next, you'll be telling poor people to take financial advice from the guy who YOLO'd everything he had on Dogecoin. This guy's advice is worth exactly nothing and anyone with a room temperature IQ is able to see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 02:01 AM
2

What are you even on about? Let's say that I go online and harp about how easy it is to start your own business. Then it turns out I got 1 million from dad to get going. Does my advice carry the same weight? Sure, I could have been just as successful without the head start, but that is not how it happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 08:39 PM
2

It literally doesn't matter if he could have done it regardless of steroids. He didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 08:25 PM
1

Yep, Wilt Chamberlain claims to have had sex with 20,000 women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 08:01 PM
1

Why do people have such difficulty understanding the Pareto principle? You don't have to accept it, but understanding it is not that difficult. Think of it in terms of money. Currently, 86% of America's wealth is concentrated in the top 20% of the people. It doesn't mean that nobody else has any money at all, just that 20% of people have the vast majority of it. Just apply this to casual sex/relationships. Like I said, you don't have to accept this as fact. This is not a law, it's not a scientif…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 07:51 PM
4

He literally did need the steroids. It doesn't matter if he could have theoretically achieved the same results without them, he didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 07:34 PM
4

It's only settling if you can do better. Are you in the top 5% of eligible women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 01:59 AM
5

The summary of this entire comment chain is this. "I don't need a rich guy, I just need a guy who is in the top 5-7% of income earners in America". She is about as realistic as a jobless incel wanting a big titty, goth, mommy, bangmaid girlfriend. I'm just going to somewhat sarcastically wish her luck and be on my way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 01:35 AM
3

"I don't know about putting 15- to 20% into a 401k each check that's a bit extreme" Exactly, the math doesn't add up unless the dude is making 125-150k. She said as much. Why are you still on this? It is not about a comfortable lifestyle. It's about her kind of lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 01:23 AM
1

This is what I said "That is a fairly stupid comment. Do women routinely orgasm from sticking dildos up guys assholes"? This is about the stupid comment demanding that guys let women peg them out of fairness. I don't care about the Johns you see at work. They are not important to this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 01:18 AM
3

You can live a good life on 85k, but not the kind of life that she wants. One vacation is not 20k. 1 vacation is 5k. She wants two vacations a year. Eating out and drinks 1-2x a week is another 10k a year. She does not strike me as an Olive Garden type of girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 01:11 AM
1

"Can afford house payments in the nice part of town, cars, vacations twice a year, going out at least once a week to dinner drinks, putting 15-20% into 401k. If something happens to me where I can't work I don't want to lose my lifestyle." poster is cloudberrypunch
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 01:08 AM
0

Women pay to peg men up the ass? Normal women? Take 100 random women, hook them up to a lie detector (pretend they actually work) and ask them if they enjoy pegging guys. How many would answer yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 01:01 AM
5

Where exactly can you own a nice house, put away 15-20k into 401k and spend 20k on vacations and eating out while supporting a non-working spouse? All this on a 85k salary? It's literally impossible. The numbers don't add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 12:57 AM
6

Did you not read her comment? She wants a guy who can contribute 15-20% of his salary to 401k, eat out 1-2x a week, and go on vacations 2x a year while owning a house in the nice part of town. There is nowhere in America that can be done on a single middle-class man's income. Even 85k is not enough. She doesn't want a construction worker. She wants a banker or doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 12:44 AM
6

So you still want someone above the top 10% of income earners. Someone in the neighborhood of the top 5%. Good luck I guess. Edit Even good jobs don't match all that much. Usually, they have a cap of a few grand beyond which they will no longer contribute. It's not nothing, but it's not all that much in the grand scheme of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 12:13 AM
3

Yes, I assumed that most women don't enjoy sticking dildoes up guys assholes because I live on earth and have interacted with humans before.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 12:03 AM
1

50k is not enough for that kind of lifestyle anywhere in the US. Even 125k is fairly unrealistic. A guy won't be able to support a family all by himself and put away 20-25k a year for their retirement. Especially if you expect to go out once a week and have two vacations a year. That alone is going to add another 20k in expenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:59 PM
5

That is a fairly stupid comment. Do women routinely orgasm from sticking dildos up guys assholes? Guys don't want to be pegged and women don't want to peg them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:52 PM
7

So somewhere in the neighborhood of 250k a year? Less than 3% of couples make that much combined. Do you expect a guy to provide that kind of lifestyle to you all by himself?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:39 PM
6

Empirical research has revealed a positive relationship between the number of sex partners and involvement in antisocial behaviors. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2008.9989131 There are numerous studies like this. Being an asshole positively correlates to having more sexual partners. Even being an outright criminal positively correlates to having more sexual partners. Assholes get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 10:57 PM
14

Damning with faint praise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 01:20 AM
8

That is her thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 09:17 PM
1

They are only open about it on the internet. They have walls of posts advising each other to lie to the men they date.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 08:07 PM
2

She is a 4 at best, she would need to lose 30 pounds to be a 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:06 PM
2

As a % of the individuals who participate here, I don't know. As a % of the posts, maybe around 35%. Like 70% of the posts are made by the same 20-30 reddit users. FDS make up a disproportionate number of prolific participants.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:14 PM
2

Depends on the state. Texas is 6 weeks, New York and California are like 24 weeks. Every state makes its own laws on abortion as long as they don't contradict the federal laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 05:56 PM
1

This is a general trend and not just a one-year anomaly. Covid didn't help, but it's not what is causing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 10:07 PM
1

Are you seriously suggesting that the recent increase of sexlessness is due to people forming sexless romantic relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 08:07 PM
1

It's not very complex. People not forming intimate relationships is bad for the individual and society as a whole. The fewer people are hooking up, the fewer people form relationships, the fewer people marry and have children. People have noticed a negative trend that is harmful to everyone in the long run. Some people care, some don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 05:18 PM
1

Ask him how many men he thinks you slept with and report back to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 11:11 PM
1

Generally, people can't keep up an act for prolonged periods of time. Everyone slips up eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 11:10 PM
2

I'm too young to know. As far as I can tell, the roads were always shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 01:55 AM
1

I don't necessarily mean stereotypes. I meant like preferring a particular color or shape. I think that can apply to preferring a particular race or hair color as well. There is also the mere exposure effect to consider. I just don't think it's a sinister thing to have a preference. I can easily see someone having a "type" the same way they can have a preferred food. "It taste good" is not that deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 01:52 AM
1

What motivation? Can't people just have an aesthetic preference? Not everything is laden with hidden motivations.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 01:30 AM
2

Taxes for building and maintaining roads are good. The roads we receive in exchange for those taxes are shit. Some people are afraid that they will end up paying twice as much for half of what they receive now. It's not that people hate the poor, it's that they think the government is shit. Less government=less shit. Personally, I'm mostly fine with universal health care. Though I do cringe when people call it "free". Also, I will probably get a pay cut under universal healthcare, so that sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 01:12 AM
2

I think it might depend on who is in power at the moment. Just like with the vaccines. When Trump was pushing the vaccine, plenty of left-wing, blue check marks on Twitter were anti-vax. Now it's the reverse. The same exact people that were saying not to get any vaccine that comes out during the Trump administration are now screeching that anybody who doesn't get the vaccine is an evil murderer. Some people just go along with whatever their tribe is selling at the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 12:41 AM
2

TIL today.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 12:18 AM
7

There is no point in asking this question. No woman is ever going to go "yeah I was totally down for anything with my fuckbuddy, but my hubby only gets one bj a year on his birthday". The women who have great sexual chemistry with their husbands are going to tell you, the women who do missionary three times a year are not going to comment. This guy is just wasting his time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 12:03 AM
2

British assassin no, James Bond yes. It would be like rebooting Buffy with Benedict Cumberbatch. If you want to use a property for name recognition, you can't change too much about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 10:40 PM
4

Why even bother saying say so stupid and passive aggressive? Evil people are evil and will hurt and take advantage of you. You can't expect them to change, you can only alter your behaviour to protect yourself. How does this sound to you? Instead of providing women safe havens and adoption options why don't we just ask them to stop throwing their babies in garbage cans?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 05:46 PM
4

Its just a type a bias mixed in with the just world falasy. I got a job right out of college (because of personal connections) therefore the job market is easy. Anybody who can't get a good job right away is a loser. I actually did get a job right away due to personal connections and didn't have to struggle out of college, but I'm self aware enough to realize that regardless of how competent I am at my job I still got lucky. Better students that I have struggled for almost a year to get their fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 05:30 PM
17

While he is clearly romantically successful, it's doubtful that he can give out good dating advice. Being a good employee and interviewing well are two different skills. If a guy has had the same job for 20 years, he is unlikely to give good job hunting advice. He is probably more useful than the guy who hasn't had a job in 20 years, but not as useful as the guy who changes jobs every couple of years to max out his salary.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 05:16 PM
6

WTF is wrong with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 07:12 PM
1

Courthouse and city hall ceremonies account for between 3 and 4 percent of marriages. All those courthouse weddings are basically a rounding error.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 07:57 PM
2

You didn't say that you wouldn't talk with your guy friends about this because it's inappropriate. You said that "They’re gonna think I want to fuck them". Two very different statements. You also said that you talk about this online because "there’s no way to fuck me through anonymous social media".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 06:42 PM
2

So you think that were we to have this conversation in real life, I would be trying to jump your bones? That this completely unsexy conversation would drive me crazy with lust? Even a random guy off the street won't think that you are coming on to them, let alone a married friend. Honestly, I think I'm done with this exchange. There is nothing to be gained from continuing this further. I don't think this is going to get anywhere. Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 06:23 PM
3

You have very strong opinions about a topic you seemingly never discussed with anybody. Also, why in the hell would your married friends think you are trying to fuck them? You are having a conversation about this topic right now and nobody is thinking "she is totally trying to fuck me, bro". I don't understand the way your mind works.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:13 PM
3

Do women want to be used as sugar mommy maids? Is that really better than being used for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:32 AM
4

I completely and utterly disagree with you. You are placing all the blame, responsibility, and power at the hands of men. As if women are merely empty shells who only respond when acted upon. You can not control how other people act or respond to your actions. Lastly, being able to press the right buttons to get the desired result is not the male fantasy. Men want to be desired and loved for who they are without putting on an act.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:13 AM
11

The point is that these guys who are only "good for sex but not relationships" are never lacking either one. The fact that not all women try to seriously date the fuckboys only to give up and change targets to the husband material guys after numerous failures is irrelevant. There are more than enough women like that for it to be an issue for the average guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:04 AM
3

For a guy, you seem to not understand the male perspective at all. Men want to feel special too, they want the wife material girl to be a slut for them. Instead, many get the opposite. That is the issue we are discussing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 04:31 AM
28

Yet for some reason, women try to have relationships with them anyway. Women don't use those men for sex, they get used by them. Then they pretend like that was their plan all along.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 04:16 AM
5

The husband material guys are "butthurt" because they do not feel desired. Either their women don't desire them as much as the fuckboys or they don't know how to show it. Are they not allowed to want to be wanted without having to bring 567 other things to the table? Why is the husband material guy not allowed to want to do the fuckboy stuff as well as the husband stuff? Why is that off the table? Why should the men be happy with that? Honestly, the more empathetic gender is really lacking any e…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 04:07 AM
4

Are you calling all the women who have ever participated in casual sex sluts? Do you think none of the women in your social circle have ever done so? Have none of the women these guys married ever been with a fuckboy? If they have, are they automatically dysfunctional sluts? Perhaps you should just stick with "I really don't know". Maybe you could ask a few of the husband material guys you know and trust about their experience if you don't want to listen to the men here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 03:37 AM
7

Do husband material guys have it easier or harder than the fuckboys? Do they have to put in more or less effort to get women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 02:50 AM
9

Do women actually prioritize husband material guys? I don't see women throwing themselves at husband material guys like they throw themselves at fuckboys.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 01:59 AM
34

Men want to be desired by women without having to be a provider. They want to be wanted just for who they are. The fuckboys are desired without having to offer anything more than just themselves. Husband material guys aren't desired unless they bring more to the table. Is this really difficult to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 01:53 AM
1

Are atheists more liberal? Is that a statistic or a personal observation? I would classify most atheists as libertarian. I guess it depends on the age group you are talking about. Some of the younger people are atheists simply because they hate conservative religious people, not because they are sceptics or rational thinkers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 05:32 PM
1

That's like saying water cures hunger. One cannot replace the other. Same way a friend or a dog can't replace wanting a child. Why can't women who want children just be happy with cats? Because it's not the same thing and does not fulfill the same need. Just because we label everything loneliness doesn't mean its all the same type of loneliness that can be substituted by other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 04:52 PM
1

Philia is not the same thing as Eros. One cannot replace the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 04:35 PM
2

My comment was only addressing the claim that women dress up for men and therefore the men should pay for the date.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 03:23 PM
1

I don't hate my job, but I would never work another day in my life if I had the option. Why in the hell would I want to spend my time and energy working? If work was something I truly enjoyed, I would be paying people to let me work, instead of the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 03:00 AM
–

Sounds like stealing from the family. I'm guessing you're fine with the husband stashing away part of his income in undisclosed accounts "just in case". Having your own money is fine, not telling your spouse that you are stashing some money away is untrustworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 02:38 AM
0

I've never seen men complain that women who pay for themselves are "too progressive". Also, paying for your own things seems like the very opposite of a left-wing progressive. Left-wing is more of a "give me free things because I deserve them" kind of movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 02:11 AM
2

You are trying to give a favorable impression of yourself to the other person. That is purely working for your own self-interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 01:39 AM
3

She did not think they were good looking. If women were unable to tell what men find attractive, they would look/act very differently. Tell me, why do you think a woman who is fit and knows how to dress/do her makeup well would suddenly lose that ability when it comes to judging their friends? If they know how to make themselves attractive, they know if their friends are ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 01:33 AM
0

That's the impression I got from the posts here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 10:52 PM
0

Jesus christ poppy, aren't you like 50 something? Stop this weird teenage mean girl act. It's kinda disturbing. Act your age, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 10:50 PM
1

Struck a nerve?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 06:11 PM
1

Mid six figure salary, what a load! Yes, I too have millions of dollars net worth and spend all day browsing Reddit instead of living luxuriously. Who are you trying to impress? Who is dumb enough to believe you? For an attractive young woman with a shitton of money, you seem to have absolutely no social life whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 06:02 PM
1

I know people who have trouble getting a good job because of their visible tattoos. That is something they did not think about in their 20's.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 03:17 PM
0

impulsive- acting or done without forethought forethought--careful consideration of what will be necessary or may happen in the future It's not necessarily a spur of the moment decision/action. It's a poorly thought-out decision/action. Just because it takes more than 5 seconds to get a tattoo, doesn't mean these people thought about how the tattoo will affect their lives for more than 5 seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 03:02 PM
-1

Having tattoos as a lawyer is very poor planning. I'm guessing they have to cover them up at court. If the jury sees they will be biased against their client. There is a reason layers wear suits and nice watches instead of wife beaters with sleeve tattoos. Salesmen, doctors, lawyers, will all lose money with tattoos showing. WTF kind of doctor has tattoos? I work at a hospital, where are the tatted-up doctors hiding from me? You think grandma is going to get her medical advice from MD FaceTattoo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 03:13 AM
3

Nobody wants a blank slate. That is just something you decided because you have trouble with men. If you acknowledge that every couple has shared interests/hobbies why are you harping on about the weird "blank slate" nonsense? That's not even a stereotype about men, you are the only person on the planet who has ever expressed this idea to me. Not even the manhating Tumblr feminists have said something that weird, and they think all men are rapists.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 02:55 AM
0

Impulsive-acting or done without forethought. Not thinking about how you would live/look with tattoos 20 years down the line is the definition of impulsive. Stop correcting people when you are wrong. It makes you look like an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 02:34 AM
3

Nobody is afraid of educated and wise women. That is something unpleasant, unattractive women made up to make themselves feel better. That is like a neckbeard saying that he is too much of a free-thinking intellectual for women to handle. Women just can't handle his encyclopedic knowledge of Star Wars, too intimidating.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 02:20 AM
4

I don't see a problem with a boring monogamous guy wanting a boring monogamous woman. Not everyone had sex with 50 people and did drugs in their 20's. What's wrong with wanting someone with a similar background/lifestyle? No shit guys want a woman who shares their interests and hobbies. Do women want guys who only talk about Transformers and Star Trek? Women constantly complain that guys like video games, sports, etc. I know jacked, high earning, family men at my gym, who still get shit from the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 02:11 AM
3

You're making a weird distinction with no real difference. I legit can not understand your "real men" comment. There is not a single group of guys that I have ever met that would have a problem with someone not liking tattoos. "Shit they find unappealing" is part of their preferences. Is not liking fat women "gay" now? You are very passionate about this, but I just can't understand why.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 01:58 AM
5

Not being in debt is unambiguously good. A guy can't reasonably expect to start a family with a woman in her 40's. Political opinions are fine as long as you're not too crazy about them. Nobody wants to hear about politics at Thanksgiving dinner. It's boring and tiresome. Personality is great, guys complain about women being boring all the time. The guys here post all the time about wanting a woman with hobbies beyond "travel" and "eating out". Guys would be more open to career women if they wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 01:43 AM
3

So the problem is not that they have a preference, but that they vocalize it? I don't agree, but have it your way. I still find your "acting like women" comment very bizarre though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 01:32 AM
6

Only boomers don't like women who look like this https://www.flickr.com/photos/jramspott/5797708967/in/gallery-43387982@N05-72157651166105965/ You do know that people age right? Tattoos are a good way to look like a trainwreck at 45. No part of that woman's look is enhanced by the body art. At least without the tattoos, she would look like a normal person. edit-wrote the same word twice
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 01:27 AM
4

Not liking tattoos is thinking like women? Are men allowed to have any preferences at all? Are we required to take any willing woman that comes our way? Even the obese ones with tramp stamps and three kids by three different men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 01:13 AM
2

Not liking tattoos is petty? I can't even begin to understand your thought process. How, why? Let me guess, you like tattoos and therefore anybody that doesn't like them is evil. How dare people not like the things that I like!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 12:34 AM
9

That is one hell of a conspiracy theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 12:28 AM
8

That only applies to women, men have to accept that every woman is beautiful just the way she is. Men with preferences are misogynists. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 10:02 PM
1

How few sexual partners did women prefer that men have? Zero? One to two? Was lower n-count more preferred overall, or was there a "sweet spot" of around 5 or so before higher n-count started to discourage women? Can you link the study?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 04:07 AM
1

At least you're consistent. That said, I find that women care much less about men's n-count. Unless it's too low of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 03:57 AM
3

Do you also advocate that should not marry promiscuous women because of the higher risk of divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 03:39 AM
1

Another brain-dead hot take from the OP. What is the point of trolling online? Does it make you happy to waste people's time? What do you get out of it? Homelessness is not a housing issue, it's a mental health and drug issue. The only way we are going to solve homelessness is if we start involuntarily committing people to rehab and mental institutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 04:53 PM
2

It works because calling them out takes a lot of time and effort. If you just say they are contradicting themselves, they will ask for proof. If you give them proof in their own words, they will just ignore it. All you have accomplished is wasted your time. In real life, people would get tired of talking to them and just stop inviting them to social gatherings. Online they are free to spam low-effort troll posts all day and night.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 04:35 PM
2

You can't bargain attraction but you can tell people to get a reality check. If women expect a Ferrari on a 2001 Toyota Camry budget then they need a wake-up call.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 01:56 AM
4

Most people are boring, that includes women. The only difference between us is that gender roles allow women to be boring without harming their dating prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 01:41 AM
5

Part of it is that there are lots of people here with different opinions. Part of it is that some of them are full of it and will say whatever is convenient to their argument at this very second. The same women who say that men are just sissies for being nervous about approaching women will the very next second say that all women everywhere are constantly afraid of men and that nobody should ever talk to a woman he doesn't already know. Same women who say that women's standards are at rock botto…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 01:28 AM
2

It's not about being silent. It's about not reinforcing negative thought/behavioral patterns. You are hurting your recovery with this all men are evil abusers rhetoric. Talk to your therapist about these feelings. I don't think she will encourage this mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 01:24 AM
5

Seriously midwest, get help. You are not well. Stop posting here and go see a mental health specialist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 01:01 AM
6

"Just approach women Bro, nobody is going to bite your head off for it." Also, "all women are literally scared every day that random men will rape/kill them in broad daylight in the middle of a busy street and don't want men to talk to them".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 12:48 AM
4

She knows, she is just trying to "own" the men here with a hot take.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 12:33 AM
1

Multiple men have told you, "there is no fighting for male birth control, it's outside of our control". Stop repeating this brain-dead hot take. There is literally nothing men can do to speed up the process. Various companies are already looking into male birth control options. They are doing it to make money, money is a powerful motive. Once they find a good method, they will sell it. Until then, there is nothing to be done. Every man on the planet can walk outside right this minute and chant "…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 12:31 AM
4

Invest and retire early.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 01:13 AM
3

In countries like France, you need to go to court and ask a judge for permission to get a paternity test. The judge can and does refuse to allow you to get one in order to "keep families intact".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 01:12 AM
10

It's not the women I associate that that use terms like toxic masculinity to malign men. It's mostly online spaces and media that use it. I don't think I've ever heard a real-life woman mention manspreading, mansplaining, toxic masculinity, male gaze, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 06:07 PM
10

Seems like we agree with each other on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 05:56 PM
8

They interpret it that way because 90% of the time it is meant that way. Please don't insult our intelligence by suggesting otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 05:29 PM
8

Toxic masculinity has a much more negative connotation to it. If the goal isn't to malign men maybe feminists should replace the term with performative masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 05:22 PM
–

100% of the people on earth can easily stab or shoot you, but I doubt that is something you worry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 01:48 AM
7

You think sluts are having sex with the basement dwellers? I've seen "prudes" with less than attractive boyfriends. I've never seen a slut date an ugly guy unless she was explicitly milking him for cash. Hell, I've seen many less than attractive (being diplomatic here) sluts openly mock guys who IMO were out a bit of their league for deigning to show interest in them. The kind of guys that can get "sluts" can just as easily get a "non-slut". The inverse is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 04:49 AM
11

I honestly find comments like that disgusting and void of empathy. Who thinks like that? It's the equivalent of saying "You're not entitled to a job you loser. You are just trying to scam me out of my money" to someone who complains about the job market. Frankly, a lot of the women here seem to completely ignore what was written and instead chose to reply to what they think you really meant instead, it's infuriating.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 04:28 AM
3

By all means, continue being a bigot. Whatever keeps you warm at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 10:19 PM
5

Sally Miller Gearhart The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race. Mary Daly If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males. As for "no history of women being as evil as men" look up female serial killers and terrorist. Here is one to get you started. Countess Elizabeth Báthory
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 08:53 PM
1

Is it fun? Maybe its just my own bias, but I can't imagine that being fun. I've talked with Chads at the gym about videogames and shit on occasion. They like to game just like the rest of us mortal men. I've never seen or heard a guy like that trolling incel forums.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 08:53 PM
2

Factorio is a fun game, shitposting on incel forums is just pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 08:42 PM
4

They are LARPing to make themselves feel superior. Do you think anybody with an active sex/social life is going around spamming on multiple threads everyday? Real Chads don't have the time nor the inclination to bother with that nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 08:24 PM
2

What? What are you talking about? What do I believe?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 05:47 PM
3

We already do. Just because we don't feel the same way as you about things, doesn't mean we are wrong. Just because we act a certain way, doesn't mean that we can't feel things. Men want to feel loved and desired just like women. Sex is how we feel loved and desired. Just because you don't feel the same way doesn't mean our feelings are wrong and illegitimate. People need money to live, you can't eat passion. Women don't love broke men. If women financially supported their men, men would pursue …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 05:31 PM
2

I don't know who that is, nor do I care enough to find out. Besides, my question is mostly rhetorical. I know you're full of it. There is nowhere on earth were short, ugly guys are "Getting mad bitches". Even fiction/fantasy is not unrealistic enough to portray a scenario like that. Keep lying to random people on the internet if that is what gets you off, nobody is stupid enough to believe you anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 10:31 PM
2

I’ll take that as your way for saying “Yes, I was making things up to own the incels”.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 06:58 PM
3

Where exactly are you located that ugly, short men are getting "mad bitches"? Even weeby wish fulfilment harem anime is not that unrealistic. Are these guys rich? Do they sell drugs? What is going on here exactly? I'm guessing you're full of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 04:36 PM
1

Unfortunately, cutting government programs is politically unappealing. People are looking to the government to provide more and more things. Nobody is going to vote for the guy cutting benefits. Growing the population is the only way to keep the current (unsustainable) level of spending. That said, we don't can't know if the world is overpopulated. Humanity is constantly innovating. 100 years ago we could never have hoped to sustain the current population. It is not outside the realm of possibil…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 06:52 PM
2

You can't have a shrinking population in a welfare state. If you want to shrink the population, you need to get rid of many government programs. Are you okay with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 05:06 PM
2

You are free to view dating as unequal. Just don't get upset when the relationship that develops is also unequal. You want a guy to play at being a provider. Don't be upset that he wants you to do all the domestic chores when you move in together.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/21 12:48 AM
2

Seems like a bad attitude to start a relationship on. Honestly, I would think twice before dating someone with that kind of attitude. If I was just trying to get laid, I would be fine with it as I see that as the cost of doing business. If you demand payment upfront, I would see the "relationship" as transactional. Once you put a price tag on something, it becomes a product.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/21 12:07 AM
1

So why pretend to be fair? It's not "You ask, you pay", it's "I always expect the man to pay". Why put on the thin veneer of plausible deniability? edit- I didn't notice that you pay after the first date before I replied. I apologize, that was completely my fault. Honestly I'm surprised given your post history, that threw me for a loop.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 06:23 PM
1

How often have you asked men out and payed for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 05:32 PM
2

Sounds like you are the lazy user. Traditional gender roles, or modern egalitarianism. Pick one or the other. Trying to get the best of both worlds makes you look like an entitled user. Insulting people who notice the hypocrisy, makes you look even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 05:21 PM
2

Men slut shame for the same reason women shame men about absolutely everything they do. They think they can bully the other into changing their behavior to their own benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 01:17 AM
1

I'm still doing what? Is that suppose to be some kind of gotcha? Some men are evil, violent, rapists. Saying some people are dangerous is not a controversial statement. Saying "I don't care" if people suffer is. You are just looking for excuses to be toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 12:41 AM
1

So that make it ok for you to be a sociopath? Women here "quite frequently" accuse all men of being violent rapists. I suppose that make it even in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 12:34 AM
1

Saying "not my problem" to people being used and abused is sociopathic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 12:23 AM
2

That is downright sociopathic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 12:05 AM
2

Let's pretend men are slut shaming strategically, and not because they find promiscuous women inherently unattractive. What would the average guy gain by cheering on the groupies of high status men? What is the endgame here? Some kind of trickle down sexual economics?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 11:43 PM
1

It's different! For obvious reasons that I'm not going to elaborate on. Only a bigot can't see that. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 10:38 PM
0

I've been groped and stalked by women before. I've also been insulted for turning down women before (women can't handle rejection). This doesn't happen often anymore now that I'm a grown man and am fairly muscular, though drunk women still can get handsy occasionally. Many men have similar experiences. I don't use that as an excuse to insinuate that all women are rapist, that their sexuality is toxic, and that they should not be allowed to go outside at night. I also don't post kill all women on…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 10:35 PM
1

Male, early 30's, INTP-A Purple might be most accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 12:14 AM
1

I don't know about the CIIB, but people lie with statistics all the time. Either on purpose or by accident. Failing to properly take into account all the variables will lead to vastly different numbers. Even experts have blind spots. I have been reading a lot about finances lately, IRA's, renting vs leasing cars, home ownership. Every single expert I've read failed to take account of all the variables to make a proper apples to apples comparison. Literally all of them were wrong in some way or a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:29 PM
1

Let me repeat myself, you are being purposefully obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 10:47 PM
1

You are being purposefully obtuse. Have you never heard of twitter, tumblr, day time television, or even reddit? If you think people only laugh at women you are wildly out of touch with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 10:24 PM
1

You have still not acknowledged that we do not live in a free market. Everybody on the planet marries for reasons other than physical attraction on some level. Men less so than women, but they also take other things into consideration, such as attitude, intelligence, responsibility. Redpill exaggerates things when they say guys only care about looks. If that was really the case, they would encourage sticking your dick in crazy. Also, beta buxx is only a problem due to him being taken advantage o…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 12:36 AM
4

Two lower class individuals pooling their resources together and raising a family is not beta buxx. It is however, a path out of generational poverty. People make poor long term decisions, especially when they are enabled to do so by the government. Poor men and women building a life together would uncountably be good for both society and those men and women. Beta buxx is more of a middle/upper class phenomenon. A good example of beta buxx from my own life would be my previous dentist. Got clean…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 12:17 AM
6

We do not have a free dating/relationship market. The welfare state alters peoples dating/marriage choices by providing artificial "subsidies" to low income women. This alters their dating/relationship choices. It's like farming subsidies altering the farmers crop choices and produce prices. You can argue that it's a good thing that protects vulnerable women/children, but not that it's a free market. I am not making a judgement either way, just pointing out that it's not a free market.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 09:04 PM
2

True, they can afford to be jackasses. They got men licking their boots for money and women throwing themselves at their feet. I would probably be a smug bastard too if I was in their position.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 01:33 AM
2

You will find that when other factors are controlled for there is no statistically significant difference between men's and women's earnings. Men are in positions of power now because they started climbing the latter 40 years ago. Most women stopped climbing that latter when they got to a good enough position. Some men are crazy enough to work for 80 hours a week to make money that they cannot spend. I am not one of these men. That is why I am not at the top. At least, not yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 01:10 AM
2

Women did not get sent to work in the galleys. Women would be physically abused less severely because that reduces their "value" as slaves. Bloody and bruised women are not attractive to most people, even slavers. The point is that I doubt that you or I would easily trade one type of abuse for the other. Galley slaves would be lucky to live 10 years. A "bedwarmer" slave would live far longer. Unlike you, I am not arguing that one form of suffering is better than the other. I am capable of acknow…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 01:06 AM
1

Handsome, wealthy, well educated men gross you out?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 12:51 AM
3

You would prefer to be a galley slave or mine for ore? Maybe a short hard life full of whipping would be preferable to being raped. I am not able to quantify which is worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 12:38 AM
1

Highly ambitious, risk taking, well connected, workaholic men earn/make positions of power is not what people like you imply with your choice of words. Men "get" positions of power, implies that they do not earn them, and are given them by virtue of their sex/gender. This is obviously not the case, but that is the implication. Also, attractive people of both genders make more money. I don't see what being male has to do with it. As for men getting these position easier than an equally qualified …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 12:18 AM
0

Men "get" positions of power? Where are those being given out? I would love to skip grad school and just be given money and power. Can you hook me up?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 06:25 PM
1

History is written by and about powerful men. People like OP assume that's how all men lived. When taking about "men" they aren't talking about serfs, slaves, or even yeomen.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 06:15 PM
3

It's Man-Boobs, what did you expect. I don't think I've ever seen him make a good argument for as long as I've been aware of his existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:49 PM
1

Would "renting" make more sense to you? Twenty-five women "renting" a few weeks with the quarterback still leads to a lopsided sex ratio. Yes, he is not with the entire cheerleading squad at the exact same time, but after about a year he has been with all or most of them at one point or another. This is what the redpills mean by "sharing". It's not difficult to understand. Same with the 80-20 rule. The 1% have 38.5% (likely more today) of the nation's wealth. That doesn't mean that the average A…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 05:46 PM
3

Why don't you build a commune? Instead of spamming "men bad", lead by example. Show us a better way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 08:16 PM
1

You are perfectly free to create such a society at any time. Get your friends together, buy some land, build a town, start a commune. Buy an island and create your own little nation state. Create your utopia and prove to the world how much better a women only society is to live in. People have build new towns, cities and governments from nothing since before recorded history.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 07:19 PM
0

Is she stupid, or is she being purposefully obtuse? I think she is just trolling/venting. I've looked into the posting history of some of the women here. You know, the ones that say women were basically slaves and 50% of men are rapists. A lot of them have mental health issues. Some of them are sex workers. I think it's just a coping mechanism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 09:57 PM
2

I give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 08:56 PM
2

I live in the US. My father was in Afghanistan. I would have been fighting in Ukraine if I did not immigrate. "If I did not leave Ukraine when I was young, I would have been drafted now". Meaning, I was from Ukraine and I left. Do you not read what people type?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 08:05 PM
2

Russia ended serfdom and slavery around the same time America did. Russian selfs were little different from slaves depending on the time period. Depending on the time period Russia had both serfdom and slavery, with serfs having a little more freedom. At some point slavery was abolished, but instead of giving the slaves more rights, the serfs got rights taken away. Men as a class did not have rights for the vast majority of human history. Rights, freedoms, and social mobility is a very recent de…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 08:01 PM
0

Do you seriously think that serfdom and slavery only extended to black people in America? If you think slavery or serfdom was in any was comparable to being a 1950's housewife you are downright insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:50 PM
1

Women, or you? If I was older I would have been drafted to fight in Afghanistan. Hell, if I didn't leave Ukraine when I was young, I would have been drafted now. But, none of that matters because I'm living a comfortable life in the States. It would be gross if I pretended I was oppressed, because of something that other people experienced before I was born. You, were never disenfranchised. You, always had rights. Frankly, its disgusting how you're using the past to pretend that you are oppresse…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:44 PM
0

Always? Why do feminists pretend that history began in 1950's America? If I was born a few generations earlier I would have been a serf, maybe even a slave.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:28 PM
4

You, used to not be able to have a bank account? How ancient are you? Do they have good wifi in your assisted living facility?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:16 PM
1

It's slightly disingenuous to wear things like body shaping yoga pants, padded bras, platform shoes, shoulder pads ect. A nice dress and getting your hair done is great. Botox and a corset is purposefully deceptive. If men started to wear platform shoes, muscle suits under their clothes, and stuffing socks down their pants to get a huge bulge, would that not be disingenuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:29 PM
1

Not teeth whitening, piercings, or tattoos. Everything else on the list is a slight is a slight form of deception. Especially plastic surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:19 PM
0

Your appearance is what you look like in the morning right after your shower. Image filters, fake hair, fake nails, colored contacts ect, are not a part of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 04:22 AM
1

You have reading comprehension issues. Incels are not having sex with women. They are the awkward, poor, borderline autistic guys that are struggling with life. Red pill are jaded guys who do have sex with women. Both groups have members that are toxic. Neither is praised by mainstream society like feminism. Feminism is praised despite toxicity oozing from its every pore. You seem to be incapable of acknowledging this. Your comments are evasive and your bias is clear to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 08:21 PM
1

Yes? Who exactly is praising incels. Incels are despised by mainstream society. They are unsuccessful men, therefore worthless, evil, and dangerous. Their toxicity is less than half the reason people hate them. Just being a romantically unsuccessful man is enough to solicit hate, and ridicule. The most positive thing anyone says about them is that it’s that some of them aren’t evil. For some, their only crime is being ugly and awkward. Apparently, this is glorying incels in the mind of people li…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 08:00 PM
2

What a pathetic attempt at name-calling. This is what feminism looks like, insults, petty name-calling, and emotional arguments. Grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 05:17 PM
3

Once? If 99% of feminists that people encounter are "twitter trolls" then feminism is twitter trolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 05:01 PM
0

What? Why doesn't it matter? Words have meaning, this is exactly why feminists try to play word games. It's manipulation of language for the purpose of changing peoples perceptions. The vast majority of people support equality between the sexes, and have been since before I was born. However, they do not identify as feminists because it's a toxic ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 04:48 PM
1

Feminist is not "only supporting women's rights", feminism is buying into patriarchy theory, rape culture, male gaze, mansplaining, manspreading, ect. The vast majority of people who support women's rights are not feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 03:52 PM
32

I'm my experience, male feminist are wolves in sheep's clothing. The absolutely scummiest guys who shit on other men to stroke the egos' of left wing, feminist women. Every time I find a male feminist, I count the days until he is outed as some kind of sex pest or rapist. It might be conformation bias on my part, but in my impression they are disproportionately abusive. It's like the very publicly religious people who are actually scumbags. The piety is a performance to mask their real nature. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 02:23 AM
2

Weird thing to say after your previous comment. "I think society is evil because it doesn't care about peoples suffering". Also, "don't tell me about your suffering because I don't care about it".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 04:50 PM
3

It's not porn unless someone else is recording. You can't tape yourself with a prostitute and call it porn. Law enforcement isn't that dumb. Anyway, "just do crime bro", is really stupid advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 04:02 PM
2

I'm not entirely sure where you're going with this. Which group are you part of? What is reality as you perceive it? Who is gaslighting you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 05:01 PM
3

The same way men preferring thin, attractive women also doesn't exist? I've seen good looking guys with fat, unattractive women. Guess that means men don't care about looks at all. I sincerely don't understand the mindset of people like you. If something is true 80% of the time, it's a good rule to follow, it doesn't matter if exceptions exist. Don't rely of exceptions if you want to maximize you're chances of success. There are people who win the lottery multiple times in a row. That still does…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 02:31 PM
2

Emotions aren't always pleasant to deal with. People, including men, sometimes feel sad, overwhelmed, uncertain, and vulnerable. Men expressing those feelings to women often repulses them, so they stop doing it. That is why you have emotionally stunted men. It's easier to show too little emotion than to risk stepping over a line and becoming unattractive to your partner. Think of it like anorexia nervosa, being thin and in shape is very attractive. Being fat is very unattractive. The line betwee…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 12:50 AM
4

What are you on?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:24 PM
6

Dick, prick, bastard, virgin, cuck, fuckboy, incel, manlet, limp-dick, ect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 09:41 PM
–

Just become a millionaire bro!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 04:17 AM
1

That does against every law of economics. That's like saying repealing alcohol prohibition gave rise to the mafia. No, it was the other way around. When was the last time you bought illegal kidney destroying moonshine distilled in some mafiosos basement? Never, I wonder why? Are you sure it wasn't a helmets cause casualties kind of statistic? Like when armies started using hard metal helmets and casualties skyrocketed because people started to survive getting shot in the head. Legalizing prostit…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 02:35 PM
3

So you're telling men to essentially play the lottery? Sure most people lose, but if you buy enough tickets maybe you could be a millionaire. It's only a little less likely than getting struck by lighting multiple times! People win every day! There aren't enough women who like short men for all or even most of the short men that exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 10:19 PM
3

Where are these groups dedicated to liking short men? How many women are in these groups? Are there enough members for every short guy? I'm guessing its like chubby chasers. Sure they exist, but their are probably 100 fat women for every 1 guy who prefers them over someone who is in shape.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:58 PM
5

Don't complain about wealth inequality, just don't give your labor to anybody who pays less than 250k a year. It's not rocket science. How many women are fine with men who show emotion? Are there enough for every guy? Are these women really ok with men showing emotion, or do they also have a narrow range of what is acceptable?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:48 PM
0

If visiting a prostitute would make people unemployable, what do you suppose they would do if they get caught? Join the mafia? Murder the witnesses? Live on welfare for the rest of their lives? No, you did not think this through.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 09:31 PM
1

That would eliminate any benefit from making it legal and push prostitution underground. I don't think you gave this a lot of thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 06:23 PM
2

1500 bath I just googled it, baht is the Thailand currency. It's about 30 baht for 1 usd, so about 50 bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 06:20 PM
1

From my perspective FDS matches all the hateful rhetoric of PUA's, redpill, and incel communities. If you are finding this conversation productive, we can continue in the morning. For now, I am very tired and am finding it difficult to continue. Have a good night.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 03:14 AM
1

Would FDS qualify as a female supremacist community were supremacist language is common and accepted? This is not my attempt at a gotcha, I am trying to gage were the line is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:45 AM
1

Could you define the manosphere as you understand it. I want to know if we are on the same wavelength.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:37 AM
1

The men who killing people are not part of the manosphere. The only connection they share with the men here is their anatomy. They are also a greatly exaggerated problem. All the incels in the world pose less danger than local gangs and drug cartels. They are just a "sexy" news topic. Good for driving add revenue.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:16 AM
1

Callous is a world away from sadistic. His comment was callous, but factual and so did not need to be called out. That is why you heard crickets. I did not interpret his comment with the same intent you did, and I'm guessing neither did other people. That said, thank you for walking your statement back a bit. I also agree that this is a bad sub for a productive debate. Half the men here are incels and half the women are the female equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 01:39 AM
1

"He sure as hell took joy in imagining it, and I heard crickets from you and all the other “good men” present."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 12:52 AM
1

Vividly imagining what other posters really meant instead of replying to what they actually wrote in not conductive to a good debate. It's also not a standard you would like others to apply to you. You imagined that he enjoyed watching women suffer. Then you imagined that everybody interpreted his comment the same way that you did. Finally, you imagined that all the men here, including me, also enjoy watching women get abused. This all took place purely within your own mind. Previously, you said…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 12:46 AM
1

He presented a scenario, he said nothing about enjoying it. He did not say he abused women, he did not say he enjoyed watching women get abused, he did not say women deserve to be abused. Any joy you see in his comment is your own imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 12:11 AM
1

He said some women are attracted to violent dangerous men and are surprised when that violence is directed back at them. He did not say that he condoned that behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 11:17 PM
1

I hope that is hyperbole, because otherwise you have completely detached from reality. Most men are not, cannot be abusive. That's like saying most people sell cocaine for a living. Do you live in the Congo?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 11:04 PM
2

Is a pulse really all it takes for a woman to be special? Is that how low the bar has fallen for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 08:55 PM
2

Women couldn't open a bank account because they couldn't be legally compelled to pay their debts. Back then men were responsible for their debts and obligations, as well as, women's debts and obligations. Women didn't even have to pay their taxes. Men were required to pay taxes on their wives or dependents income. Women didn't even have to disclose how much money they made to their husbands. Also, women were pressured to marry by their families because their families were responsible for them un…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 03:39 PM
6

I don't understand how this is difficult for you to get. It takes time, effort, money, and a little bit of luck to get laid. Even attractive guys have to put in a bit of work. Average and ugly women are easier to get into bed. People are lazy and will be satisfied with the sexual equivalent of cold pizza if it doesn't cost them much to get. Sure they could be having a juicy steak, but that takes time to prepare. Cold pizza is cheap and freely available.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 02:39 AM
7

Sex doesn't matter to you because you have no problem getting it if you want it. Just like money isn't important to wealthy people because the only things they need to worry about are things that can't be bought. Health isn't important to young healthy physically active people because they aren't living with 5 chronic conditions. People take what they have for granted. To a man starving for physical intimacy and love, you sound like a rich person saying "money doesn't buy happiness". They are ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 04:12 AM
10

Why do women keep repeating this nonsense? Any man under 35 with no children would have an extremely difficult time getting a vasectomy. This is for the exact same reason young childless women have difficulty getting one. Physicians don't like to be on the receiving end of a baseless lawsuit or a distraught couple who can't get pregnant because their procedure can't be reversed. Oddly enough some people change their mind about kids after ten years.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 03:45 AM
0

Investments aren't magic, investing part of your paycheck every month is not going to make someone a multi-millionaire until they are retirement age. A 7 figure annual income is both statistically improbable and the kind of figure a clueless braggard will claim to seem wealthy. People who aren't use to managing money don't know how much 7 figures really is. If you said something like " 15 years ago my spouse died due to malpractice and I won 3 million in the suit" that would be more believable. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 10:25 PM
0

Wrongful death suit is a lot more believable and less dismissive than "Do you know what investments are?". Still, I doubt that someone with that kind of money can't find something better to do than shitpost on reddit. I think you're vastly exaggerating your wealth for imaginary internet clout. There is no point in doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 09:53 PM
1

I do, because I have some. In order to get a 7 figure annual return on investment you would need to have around 10-15 million tied up in very high yield investments such as stocks, real-estate, and crypto. Don't assume everyone is as out of touch with reality as you. You are not a multi-millionaire, don't be absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 09:33 PM
4

" I have a 7 figure a year income." What is the point of saying such an obvious and ridiculous lie? You would have people believe that a multi millionaire is spending all day angrily shitposting on reddit about evil incels? A seven figure income is between 1 and 10 millions dollars a year. Do you understand how much money that is? Do you understand how few people in the world make that much a year?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 04:34 PM
1

So she makes somewhere in the neighborhood of 15 dollars an hour instead of the 25 or so she could be making in even the shittiest new grad RN job. I'm also a relatively new nurse, and I make more working part time while I finish my BSN than she does working full time at Amazon. She definitely flunked out, especially since last semester of nursing school is a walk in the park compared to everything else in the program. I guess "well off" and "HVW" are relative statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 12:52 AM
1

Why in the hell would you drop out of nursing school just before graduation? I didn't drop out of the program even when my mom got cancer. What could you possibly be doing for a living to make you financially "well off" when you're not even a nurse? I don't see how you can make more than 35k a year without that RN license.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 06:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter