TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Synackaon Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by Synackaon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Appeal to false middle ground. Always focus on who instigated and made it worse. That woman didn't have to go up to their window to say a few more things. The time to cool off was right then. Yet she had to say one more thing. Right after everyone had broken up to cool down. That was the critical point between the future of everyone driving away versus a fight breaking out.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 01:33 AM
24

Untrue. That wonderful couple started it via the fighting words doctrine, which pretty much states that if you provoke violence through outrageous and inflammatory speech, you're responsible for instigating violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/16 11:47 PM
13

Damn that guy floats like a butterfly and stings like a bee.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/16 02:18 AM
2

It's homicide dammit! Homicide! Two 'I's! Instead it looks like men are the majority when it comes to killing gays. Would it have killed you to do a spellcheck before doing a post worthy of /r/AdviceAnimals?
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:32 PM
–

The dad should be charged and sentence for wilful murder. Claiming "I thought he had a gun" while discovering the victim does not have a weapon should be grounds to dismiss that defense. People should be severely punished for being wrong.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:30 PM
6

"I am the panelist. You are the audience. I OUTRANK YOU" (paraphrased and reimagined from The Producers)
/r/MensRights09/03/13 11:53 PM
3

I would love for that question to be put to the bulk of SRS. Reveal them for the supremacists they are.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:33 PM
9

where it is not required to inform sexual partners of an HIV/AIDS condition Holy SHIT. An HIV outbreak there could make dating into real life Russian Roulette.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 06:13 AM
14

B-B-But look! She's crying! Never mind that the child has friends, relations in Australia and would suffer a MAJOR dislocation in going from Australia back to the Tamil-speaking part of India.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:04 PM
1

Get out of my subreddit. You're the cancer that gives strength to the SRS'ers of the world. You don't care about women. You certainly don't care about men. We're not motherfucking animals! Yes, there are issues that the MRM/Feminist halves deal with, regarding consent, entrenched racism, custody, laws that enshrine discrimination! But you, you... thing... You'd rather demean women as deserving rape for their clothes and demean us men by assuming that simply dressing makes us want to rape.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:59 AM
2

I can sympathize with those who roll their eyes at the relatively recent alarm over boys’ achievement. Where was the indignation when men dominated higher education, decade after decade? Isn’t it time for women and girls to enjoy the advantages? The impulse is understandable but misguided. I became a feminist in the 1970s because I did not appreciate male chauvinism. I still don’t. But the proper corrective to chauvinism is not to reverse it and practice it against males, but rather basic fairne…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:19 AM
3

ReddutBlueit and sonja_newcombe are very correct. Best case you'll get a restraining order against her and all contact must be made through your lawyer. Lawyer up man...
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:02 AM
3

Not MR material (court cases, news articles, etc) Just the usual man hater stuff
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:57 AM
0

Not MR material. Just some stupid man hater.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:50 AM
7

Fox News is like a scorpion. We might say "don't sting us, sting them" but sooner or later we'll be stung. We'd ask why, but everyone knows the story ends with "I am a scorpion. It is within my nature" Broken clocks are correct at least once a day.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:59 PM
15

That's not much of a dodge. I think some great innovation comes from being able to ignore social cues and expectations - ie, drop out of college - and women are not great at that. But again, this question presumes that my book argues that men suck at everything and I gloat about that, which just means you haven't read the book. Basically, the author has stated this: Women are less likely to ignore social cues and expectations and "go it alone" like many of the great innovators and founders (that…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:53 PM
1

My primary point was addressing the case where: 1) A man and woman have sexual relations 2) They break off relations 3) She uses his sperm to make a child 4) He did not consent to having one that is related to him. Primarily because child support is utilized to ensure that planned/wanted children have the resources they need to grow, I wanted to tackle the case where the father should have a negative right (just like the mother has a negative right) to back out before the fetus is viable (ie at …
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:16 AM
6

The man she tortured to death made her do it! Because Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:40 PM
3

Apparently giving women the unconditional right to steal DNA and force child support payments is "suppressing" them. Hypocrite. You just want to seize the unfair power that many men tried to justify female ownership that you can't even see what kind of thief you are. A thief who is entitled to bring a child into the world against the wishes of others.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:26 AM
3

I see nothing wrong with that. Her body, her choice. His DNA, his consent Her DNA, her consent Without both consenting, you're just legitimizing a form of theft. You Female Supremacist.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:16 AM
2

Consenting to sex is consenting to the possibility that there might be a child as a result. The above quoted is a form of victim blaming. No one should be forced to have a child without their consent. No one. And it's no person's right to tell someone else what they must do with their body. Neither is it their right to steal half of your DNA and then be able to use child support legislation to steal your resources. No means no. In all cases. Women can have children with a partner who will suppor…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:14 AM
2

Are you suggesting that women have children without their sexual partner's consent and placing them under child support where their partner is forced to lose money for a child they did not consent to? Are you suggesting that women have children without their sexual partner's consent despite it being half their DNA? You're the one who is advocating a terrible, non-equitable idea.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:41 AM
-2

The entire issue is ridiculous. Men and women can reproduce, within reason, at any time during their sexual prime. Both parents contribute 50% of the DNA. By joining together sexually to procreate, they've entered a social contract to raise the child together. If one party does not want a child, then the agreement is null and should be aborted within reason before another kid is brought into a world where he or she isn't wanted. If your partner, (doesn't matter if you're the man or woman), wants…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:09 AM
2

I don't like how you're downvoted. You're perfectly valid -- a child is a big responsibility. If we break down a degenerate ownership of a fetus, half of the DNA is the Father's and half is the Mother's DNA. The ability to say "No" for man or woman is paramount. The ability to say "Yes" regardless of the other's feelings is criminal. You can make a fetus at nearly any time (provided you have a partner), but securing an environment where both parties truly want a child should take precedance. A m…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:04 AM
0

He named a group in a lawsuit. That can be verified as a matter of public record. Furthermore, he specifically cited an instance of an Islamic group attempting to use hate speech laws for the purposes of suppressing lawful information. Ergo, it is perfectly valid to name the group's affiliation (Muslim or Islamic both would do) in his example. The statement "don't just blame Muslims for that shit" implicitly means: "Don't just blame (all) Muslims for (all lawsuits that utilize hate speech legisl…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:26 PM
3

certain Muslims He didn't blame all Muslims, you hypocritical piece of shit. He blamed some Muslims. Some Muslims who sued against published reports on Islam! Like there are some Christians who identify themselves with the hateful rhetoric of the Westboro Baptist Church. Jesus you are dense.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:58 PM
1

I disagree. That's like saying to someone -- you commit any crime and I will see you suffer regardless of what our society has deemed is the proper punishment. That's not anyone's fucking job but the police, courts, prisons. Anyone else who hijacks that supremacy should be placed into prison for their vigilantism. One should always strive to fix the damn system, so others suffer less.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:54 PM
2

Nope. It will just create another VAWA act. Because "THE WIMMINZ!" (never mind the distribution of crimes actually committed, people just love to put the ladies on a sexist pedestal to "show how white knight-ish" they are)...
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:54 PM
1

Not always, but there are cases where a dogs life is of higher value. Say, perhaps, if the wife abused the children routinely. Then, despite being as high minded as I am, were something to happen to her in a permanent manner, I would merely state "Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy (er.. gal)".
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:53 PM
1

The judge is a piece of shit. Not unexpected at all.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:35 PM
3

Rewarding bad behavior and questionable legal actions is what a lot of men are brain washed into believing. It's rather sad.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:25 AM
5

If "it's my body and my right" is referred to with women and abortion, then "it's my penis and my right" should be for men who don't want a child. Once a child is on the way, it becomes more complicated. But if we think of making a child like entering a contract, if one party is given an escape clause, so must the other. To do otherwise invites abuse and inequity.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 08:36 PM
8

Its not about having a child. As a man, we're drilled to think of actions. No, no. This is over the theory of having another child. And she is using that theory to control you. I feel bad for your kids. They're going to have a difficult time growing up if their mother treats them with the same control as she treats you.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 08:34 PM
–

Last week I was walking home and a police officer stopped me and told me to 'stop skulking around' the neighborhood as I was going to school. Is it wrong that I think one needs a camera on them just to tell the police officer to fuck off? You never know if you're suddenly going to wind up dead with a cop that claims something outrageous to the slavish, cocksucking adulation of the general public...
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:45 PM
-11

Just like they're going to advocate for an economic system that supports the laziest and most unfortunate at the cost of the best and the wealthiest. I don't mind a more holistic approach to taxation to support our weaker members with basic life essentials. I don't mind funding education on an egalitarian basis and ensuring reasonable health care to all. But the Communists essentially say "Fuck that!" and rewrite the entire system for no other reason than because they can. They're a lost cause a…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:48 PM
7

But the other statement is of the form "You break it, you buy it". Fuck, sensitivity course, here we go!
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:32 AM
3

William Shatner?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:01 PM
2

trials are expensive.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:03 PM
–

Don't worry comrade! You are not denied the Glorious Duty of War if we need you! Your privilege grants you implicit advantage in being unwillingly drafted! Male privilege all around everybody! Every man gets the right to die! :D
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:00 PM
1

Double standards run amok in the middle of an election where outright lying and changing positions wins political capital. Liars, liars, everywhere!
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:56 PM
4

That's what they said about rape.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:55 PM
2

SRS uses outrage and anger to enforce change. Whatever happened to unifying together like the Civil Rights movement did? They didn't get angry -- they marched! They dressed up in nice clothes, organized vote drives, used community outreach! Why must be become like that which we hate to fight it?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:58 PM
4

Continued additions of irrational, bitter hatred does SRS make. It's all a matter of frequency and magnitude...
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:53 PM
3

Not all shit matters, not all shit that matters to one person has significant meaning. We have an influx of constant "I'm offended" and not enough "You're offended? So fucking what. Let's talk <sources> and <materials>"
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:52 PM
5

ThingsThatUpsetMe? Honestly, if we're splitting off the butthurt to another subreddit, we have to make it more neutral than "Shit Reddit Says", as SRS implies a value judgement. We have to call out being upset as being simply upset. Not a place to unify circlejerk or downvote brigades.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:49 PM
15

It is a true statement and a balanced one. What I find noticeable is that to see both men and women being considered as receiving abuse, instead of women being the perpetual victim. Score one for egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:34 PM
14

It may also be tit-for-tat in action (morality wise). People often return the treatment they receive to others. I'm rarely complimented. I can't remember the last time I complimented someone else.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:32 PM
22

Feminism: "Justice for me but not for you" "The Patriarchy made me do it" "I have a womb! Feel sorry for my choices!"
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:43 PM
14

radical/extremist has actually been a positive thing. I used to think similar until I ran into a woman who declared herself a supporter of mens rights. I learned that, unsurprisingly, the same gender box women are put into affects men as well. Unfortunately, an increasingly loud voice dominates the feminist movement, changing it from the historical focus of unfair laws, enshrined discrimination, et al to demanding private industry enforce quotas, etc. Take for example that women now are a majori…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:15 AM
9

Yeah, well, sometimes it's hard tolerating being part of some eponymous dominating "Patriarchy" while simultaneously being considered worthless cannon fodder for powerful interests and then being tarred and feathered as some kind of disgusting male supremacist. A lot of MRAs get shit, shit, shit. Tonnes of it. After a while, some of them lash out and become just like their abusers. It's annoying, but what can you do with the organized professional butthurt brigade that targets us, tells us "we'r…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:06 AM
6

Ideologues of any stripe who refuse to use reason and instead resort to bullying are a pox upon all of us.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:55 AM
5

Claiming it is the default would imply that all transgenders originally were straight. But they're not. So cis-gender, by definition, is the norm (ie majority of people) but for the minority, they're trans. I hope that clears up your confusion.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:08 PM
–

Indeed. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. When we break down who is to blame, on one hand I see "Family values" paraded as a representation for enforcing traditional gender constraints, on the other hand, I've had self-declared leftists claim similar biases in favor the mother, in all circumstances. When the Right and Left collude together, is it fair to single out one or the other? We as MRA's must fight both fronts, wherever the injustice lies. Does that mean that conservat…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:52 PM
–

We aren't immune to SRS-style circle jerks. This is no exception. Have an upvote to round that out.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:43 PM
–

Wait, so Marxism is the originator of binary identity politics in general? That must be before Marxism, no identity politics broke it down into Them versus Us! Must've been a utopia! /s
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:41 PM
1

Hi Abbie. I once had the duty to persuade a friend who was coming to terms with her transgendered nature away from committing suicide. I listened, and heard many things. Many things that made me angry enough to murder, to assault (she was raped by some asshole). It took days to establish a rapport, months to convince her there was something outside of the world of Alaska Fisheries for her. She's now in Texas and in a relationship going on for about a year. It swells me chest to know that when ot…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:15 PM
14

Oh Hillary, I suspected you'd never do so, you'd never call a spade a spade in these hyper-get-offended times. But I was wrong. I like being wrong sometimes.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:02 PM
8

Nice going guys. Topic is gender studies and you immediately fly to alienating MRA's based on political affiliation. This entire thread is garbage.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:40 PM
2

WW2 was drafted combat. Most politically powerless men, like their female counterparts, had no say in what would happen. But it was the men who went into the meatgrinder of combat. Some privilege, to be forced into military service against their will. I bet you'd tell an unwilling draftee to "check his privilege". Disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:52 PM
1

I get ill, knowing that had I been of age at that time, I would most certainly be on that beach. And probably dead, depending if it was Dog Green or not.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:49 PM
1

allowed to != drafted. One is voluntary, the other is "do it or be jailed indefinitely"
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:48 PM
2

Just like women can't think for themselves and do what society tells them should be done? Get off your high horse and note that both genders have been put into distinct boxes. Egalitarianism is the process of unshackling both, not just one.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:47 PM
2

I would've sarcastically responded, as loud as I could, "Oh, I'm sure it is NOT oppression to be sent off to die. You're right -- Gramma DID have it hard!" Then turn and leave. Good thing I avoid those garbage classes.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:44 PM
8

I laughed and then agreed. /r/mensrights will sooner or later have their /r/atheism moment, forcing them to decide if a SRS-style future or a more serious, focused future is desirable.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:39 PM
6

Socratic method is hard to pull off sometimes, but always rewarding when done correctly, because you (the inquirer) get a look inside the thinking processes of someone else. . His weakness is that he thinks he knows he's right and is willing to engage in debate. This means that any other debate will not resolve in either party accepting any points offered by the opposite. OP, don't take this debate head on -- you'll more likely provoke your brother to "close ranks" and try to rephrase any and ev…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:10 PM
1

I agree with that wholly. Atheism plus anything definitely overloads the term Atheism with a tonne more political ideology than "lack of belief" can ever entail.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:38 PM
1

I'd just write the first four paragraphs. The last three will be too much, too fast for someone who has already assumed much off of you and attacked you on a semi-public forum (Facebook).
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:32 PM
0

Well, the misunderstanding is on both our parts then. :P It turns out that physics-wise, there is no such thing as a pure vacuum given the Schroedinger Equation and the concept of zero-point energy. I couldn't tell what you meant, but my first assumption was that you were implying that atheism, as a lack of belief, implies a positive assertion towards something instead of a lack of something (ie not a pure absence of both matter and energy, but like actual vacuum, which would have zero point ene…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:03 PM
17

North Korea, given the political structure and almost-dynastic family control of the country, is more akin to a criminal oligarchy. Hard core communism died with Lenin. You might be thinking of Stalin's twist on things instead.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:59 PM
8

That's an erroneous comparison, unless you mean to imply there is a meaningful connection between man made definitions (which can include pure definitions, binary decisions, etc) and the physical universe (which, as we know, has all sorts of interesting states and phenomena)
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:55 PM
2

Well, if they release the code, can't we just run it ourselves? EDIT: Have asked author to let me know when he open sources it.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:14 PM
–

I find it sad that real social justice, like raising the literacy of women in developing countries or ensuring education for under privileged school children, falls to the way side. I find it sad that a supposedly "liberal" group will be ardently pro-free-speech for their members but not for anyone else. I find it the most sad of all that these... things cower behind, hijack and redefine feminism to mean "Our way over all else" instead of "equality between the sexes" with a focus on inequality t…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:48 PM
–

If he had reacted appropriately, none of this would have ever happened. That's a damn dirty lie and you know it. You have no proof to the contrary. For all you know, it was going to escalate regardless. If the altercation happened with a teenage hoodlum that was a guy instead, he'd lose his job. If some old fuck verbally harangued a teenager, got shit back and then assaulted, guess what, the old fuck still assaulted the teenager. The old fuck still committed a crime. A shouting match is not a cr…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:26 AM
11

Double standards, double standards everywhere.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 11:12 PM
10

Furthermore, he let the situation escalate to that point, Of course. It's his fault. Something happened that antagonized either him or her, and his words on the video show him further antagonizing her, instead of being a responsible normal adult and ordering her off the bus, and/or calling the police for their aid. "Officer, it was something he said! I couldn't help myself but attack him!" but he lost his employment because of his poor choice of actions, not because of gender inequalities. No, i…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 11:11 PM
2

Wow, wtf masses of reddit... The /r/gameswap one was pretty heinous too.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:44 PM
4

I really hope things do not polarize to that point. Women and men both don't need to be stuffed into the gender-exclusive box right when we're starting to pull both out and instill egalitarianism...
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:19 AM
10

As a fun note, the reason why cellphones in Japan make that awful clicking noise when you take a picture is due to too many assholes sticking their damned phones up women's skirts.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:17 AM
3

Men are more susceptible to genetic diseases though, due to the nature of the Y chromosome. ONLY sex linked (read X-based or Y-based) diseases. The only thing having two X chromosomes does is grant stability from a defective X chromosome.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:11 AM
5

Apparently assaulting anything with a vagina is a bigger felony. Fucking feminists and their special pleading.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 06:54 PM
2

Only one is potentially known to be. In any case, if Reddit proper throws enough of a shit fit (join forces with /r/nsfw ), then the admins will be forced to either admit they're going to allow skullduggery or clamp down on it.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:28 PM
5

ignatiusloyola, you have my and other MRA's support. If it comes down to /r/MensRights being bann't over SRS bullshittery, we'll follow you to the next one and rebuild.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:11 PM
10

go around and tell all your neighbors you are a pedophile, This is the most threatening of all, considering they also support mob justice, like that man who used the sexual offenders registry to track down and murder people on that list. His justification? "Getting those pedophiles out of the world" SRS applauded him. Ban them. Ban SRS before they wax everyone who disagrees with the Fempire.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:09 PM
–

Were I to rephrase your comment, I'd state it like: "Don't let one organization's terrible treatment of you mean that all lesbians don't like your art". That way, it doesn't sound like a lecturing, condescending comment but one of support and sympathy for a fan who wants to support Hiromi.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:34 PM
2

Considering that is not sworn testimony or on an issue of vital importance where lying could ruin someone's life, yeah. Pathological liar means they lie about EVERYTHING. All that has been provided is him making himself look big and strong in a ridiculous way. That's a far cry away from admitting spousal abuse, which has the effect of making him look weak and pathetic.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:28 PM
2

Planned parenthood is mostly health centers. Their abortion clinic arm actually composes a minor part of their overall functions and resource allocation. A lot of what they push is condoms, etc,.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:12 PM
3

It's an example of where a social level "theory" (and I use that word very, very loosely) gets applied (like a hammer) to everything. Professor Dutton is suggesting that the idea that a woman kills her husband only out of continued abuse is contrary to the evidence and may be influenced by the "blame society" catch-all explanation of "Patriarchy".
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:52 PM
23

I'm an worker at the dept of redundancy dept. In truth, I brainfarted. Sorry reddit.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:47 PM
65

I hope the idiot passers-by lose much more than thousands of dollars. They deserve to suffer monetarily. Wait for the "if we punish false assistance, then that will drive women who are being legitimately robbed from being helped!"-style canard...
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:13 PM
1

A market place of ideas, in business, government, academics and even unions is utterly beneficial and required to the long term survival of aforementioned areas. But people crave tradition. They hunger for stasis. They live for the "good old days" when things were "simpler". As the world gets bigger, as sexism is revealed to be simply biased judgements made solely on gender, as racism is defined as judgements made on race alone (as opposed to skill, merit, ambition, etc,.), there will be those w…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:22 AM
1

I apologize then. I must be so conditioned to look for the ideologues that I'm becoming one myself. I apologize for taking the statement "paying for himself" as a statement that the man is paying solely for himself instead of pulling his weight. I'm used to seeing the occasional shit-n-run posts that blame the man unfairly despite him usually undertaking an effort to make things better that I jump the gun. Sorry for that chief.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:18 PM
–

Considering that he is not the breadwinner, that is mostly paying for himself. That directly implies that the husband in question is NOT paying for others. That is a lie. He is paying for family groceries and maintaining the car. To imply that he is wholly paying for only himself is bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:53 PM
–

You're full of shit. Paying for groceries for the WHOLE FAMILY is NOT "mostly paying for himself". Neither is maintaining the SHARED family car. Nothing like reading the last items, of which a woman would perfectly be allowed leeway in, and ignoring the rest. Shameful.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:29 PM
0

Just a judge attempting to make a different set of standards/laws for women in order to excuse them from/lessen any punishment. Family court in the USA does this all the time.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:47 PM
1

It's a patriarch state until it is called a nanny state. See how arbitrary this shit is?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:57 PM
9

If the laws aren't good enough, change the laws. Clearly enough shitstains of the community like the criminal, so they obviously can vote...
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:34 PM
3

This is a quote of your post at 12:07 PST: Don't take daughter's school textbooks to school, because lazy and forgetful. Child's mother reminds me. Refuse to take books to school, refuse to answer phone, because I'm too much of a rebel, like House M.D. I wonder why she wants full custody? Probably misandry. Maybe, she wants her daughter to go to school with books and learn? And you're so fucked in the head, you take that as a personal insult and assume she's trying to be a bitch because her moti…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:08 PM
8

Actually, in the biased family courts, that could be argued by a (slimy) lawyer. Don't fall into their thought crime traps. That's how they torpedo many fathers who simply let their emotions get the better of them. Your only recourse is to present the most decent face ever while recording/writing down each and every abusive communique. Eventually, when it explodes and her lawyer tries to pull some canard, yours will simply put forth documentation after documentation and simply say "Your Honor, t…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:06 PM
5

Be the best dad ever and focus on making her feel safe. Treat her like a little adult who can understand things. As long as your relationship is strong as iron despite your ex, you will prevail.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:03 PM
4

Dealing with psychos is dirty business, Captain.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:00 PM
1

Peace. In all likelihood, she will not be fired. Even though a man, if he did what she did, would be. Why are you willing to enshrine an obvious injustice, when it is probable that nothing of consequence will happen to her immediately? Were a man to be publicized as saying what was said, our culture would demand he suffer, he be fired, that he is a psychopath, etc,. Some older woman doing such? Hell, you do realize that men are assigned the death penalty far more often than women are for compara…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:52 PM
10

Wait, so I support you, agree that it is satire, and even note Poe's Law, which states that shit written in parody but not called out as can appear as the real thing. And you malign me? Fuck you.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:47 PM
25

MRAs are often publicly slandered, presented as a bunch of trolls unable to hold a reasoned discussion. Vilified as a band of neckbeards unable to speak coherently. I simply say that the argument is complete bollocks and caution against simple slandering, and I get vitriol. Why are you proving the SRS'ers of the world right? They can't handle so-called debate speak either. That's why the fuckers ban everyone who thinks otherwise from their den of ideology.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:46 PM
15

Now, now, let's not go to ad hominems. The argument presented is ridiculous enough!
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:11 PM
10

Poe's Law is ever present. :D
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:11 PM
4

According to OP, both people accidentally touched each other. In no context does that qualify for discussing strategies to commit violence. That's like accidentally bumping into your black neighbor and having his grandfather yell out the window that your neighbor should assault you over that. It's not cool, it's not neighborly and it HELL ain't good for a work environment where tempers get flared all the time. Source: I work in a start up too. There's a fellow who codes so badly and mindlessly f…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:30 PM
7

This. Documentation of harassment over time can be used for a lawsuit against an employer for failing to prevent it.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:11 PM
3

In any case, talking about killing your coworker is NOT going to make them work with you better. The reason why the big companies have that absolute rule is because, sometimes, an angry man (or woman) will talk about killing their colleagues and then excuse it as a joke. Some of them actually have attempted to execute upon it. So what management has decided is that any talk of such is a precursor to something worse, even if it happens a tiny percentage of the time. Many companies are risk advers…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:09 PM
1

I'm not following. All you're saying is that human shit floats to the top. You know who pushes up the sociopaths that you describe to positions of power? Regular joes like you and me. Perhaps we should take responsibility for who we support instead of trusting them implicitly.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:49 PM
2

Ok, two things. The first part is a reasonable concern, the inability to see how one gets from A->B. I am not a communist, so I don't have any philosophy/ideology/plans to answer such. One whom identifies as a communist should answer and have their answer evaluated carefully. The second part is simply fear. Fear based on what a bunch of ideologues did to further their beliefs at the expense of human life and rights. Does that fear mean that all communists advocate such? No. It simply means that …
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:05 PM
2

I'd be happy with the statement that most if not all communist governments are hypocrites and not to be trusted on human rights by any stretch. Mostly because that could be verified. :) But attacking someone for simply identifying as "Communist" is just like attacking someone from being a Christian, Atheist, Democrat or Republican. It's an ad hominem, not a rational argument. Now, if Maryam Namazie has advocated a specific policy or specific ideology that actually speaks to human rights violatio…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:59 PM
3

I was under the impression that one can attend a LGBT gathering and remain straight. I know that it can be done, because I once walked (rather baked at the time) into a LGBT theatre production and totally did not notice. Even hit on some of the lesbians by accident (they kindly told me whom they were interested in, I apologized and went on with my life). Eventually I was asked if I was straight, to which I replied "Yes". Some people made awful expressions, but others smiled. They really liked it…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:45 PM
1

Reddiquette is not in your reportoire it seems. The foundation of communism as envisioned in Marx and Engles "Communism" actually places entire society of workers in control of your membership in that society. In other words, they regulate what resources you take, etc, much like the US Government regulates what you can do to other people and punishes many for violations (they define such violators as "criminals"). In any case, you're arguing falsehoods. They're not based off of the definition of…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:16 PM
3

Edit: Instead of downvoting why doesn't someone explain how I am wrong that communists suck when it comes to human rights? Because there is nothing in the definition of communism that defines or is contrarian to human rights. Because a series of supposed communist governments had their party leaders live in luxury while the rest of their supposedly equal citizen peers lived in poverty and squalor, directly contradicting the entire ideological backing of communism. Because the Soviet Union, which…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 05:25 PM
3

That's an absolute statement, and an admittedly weak one at that. I agreed with many of your comments that put forth the notion that a tradition does not need to be destroyed when there are other solutions. But simply stating "the ACLU is never right" in it's involvement, when we have clear violations of Church-State seperation in many areas (fyi schools are still allowed to have Christian clubs, LGBT clubs etc), it's pretty clear there are places where the ACLU is quite in the legal and constit…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 05:15 PM
3

Wait, so you agree with destroying the whole event? There are other options, like simply forcing the district to allow the single mother to attend. Or forcing a different event to crop up.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:02 AM
10

Hey man, however things work out, thank you for your service. It's little condolence that a redditor can provide, but I wish you the best.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:21 PM
2

Yeah, well, that doesn't represent the movement for equality. I know SRS acts like shits, but we don't have to abandon logic and reason for puerile nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 10:11 PM
2

TRIGGER WARNING! ( something something something)
/r/MensRights13/09/12 10:09 PM
6

Rapists are scum. And I refuse to believe all men need to be told explicitly "not to rape". Just like I refuse to believe all blacks need to be told explicitly "not to steal". The majority of men don't commit rape. And those who do oughta be strung up! After a just trial.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:02 PM
-9

Fine. Break every bone in her body but don't kill her. In other words, if you can't live a good life, neither should she.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:08 PM
-3

Fine. Break every bone in her body but don't kill her. In other words, if you can't live a good life, neither should she.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:08 PM
29

How much of your life and existence must be consumed, tortured and ruined before you'll stand up? A man's gotta know his breaking point.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter