SyndicalismIsEdge Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
15	#Equality		SyndicalismIsEdge	/r/MensRights	26/12/16 03:28 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Male privilege. Most women can and do get with guys who will support them financially to some degree (if not entirely). It is an extremely common thing. Women are nowhere near as willing to get with a guy who contributes nothing financially. The ones who do are typically fools with low self-esteem. You don't like it? Take it up with reality. Doesn't match my daily life. My I ask where you're from, these things vary a lot from country to country. My mother earns more than my dad by a considerable amount (they're…	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 07:00 PM
1	Male privilege. Men don't typically have the luxury of a "fallback option" (i.e. an SO who will pay for all their shit). What kind of society do you live in? That might have been the case 50, maybe 20 years ago, but no one in the first world, or at least in western Europe, where I live, would accept shit like that. Stay-at-home mom my ass, and that's what the vast majority of working-age men thinks around here. Is this just an American thing? Because why would men tolerate that? We're also not told at every tur…	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 06:20 PM
–	Male privilege. And men don't? Does the kind of world you live in exclusively feature men with manual labor jobs?	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 05:02 PM
–	Male privilege. Which is a smart decision. Shit's dangerous. They apply for safer jobs such as cleaning. Am I supposed to condemn them for that? It's not my fault these men feel the need to apply to dangerous jobs.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 04:04 PM
–	Male privilege. Yes, but that also applies to women, doesn't it? They choose a lot of unpleasant jobs, it's just that these tend to, on average, be safer. But does that mean men wouldn't be hired as cleaners? Or that women wouldn't be hired as factory workers?	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 03:17 PM
-3	Male privilege. Well good luck changing society. We should rather focus on the legal framework.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 01:59 PM
–	Male privilege. Why do they "have to"? They choose to do that job, probably due to societal expectations. But that doesn't change anything about it being a choice.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 01:46 PM
–	Male privilege. Too bad they didn't show the ratio of murderers or industrial workers. How convenient. Not everything is bigoted. It's possible to oppose FemiNazis without copying their tactics.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 12:57 PM
–	Amanda Knox pens essay claiming 'women confess to crimes under police interrogation because they are conditioned to please men'. What utter bollocks. Lol. I've actually seen that talk. The points he makes about the police deceiving you (which happens, of course) are valid. But they apply to situations of voluntarily talking to them, not being in custody.	/r/MensRights	17/12/16 06:37 PM
–	Amanda Knox pens essay claiming 'women confess to crimes under police interrogation because they are conditioned to please men'. What utter bollocks. EDIT: I know it sounds ridiculous, but it's true. As soon as you're in police custody, they need to mirandize you. Anything you say after having been taken into custody, but before having been mirandized, is not admissible in court. So yeah, they can trick you, but after telling you you're under arrest.	/r/MensRights	17/12/16 04:08 PM
1	Interesting /u/bartink used a complete strawman argument, though, as the original commentor never claimed to need feminism in the first place.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 06:41 AM